1. Filed of the Invention
The present invention regards a device for removable attachment to the ear.
2. Background Information
Microphone/earpiece combinations, wireless or attached by wire, to telephones, music systems, switchboards etc. are well known. Such known devices, however, frequently use a bow for the earpieces and a microphone attached to said bow. Such devices are not well suited for use with mobile apparatuses since the device should have a form that makes it easy to stow it in a pocket, bag or the like when not in use.
From the prior art one should refer to U.S. Pat. No. 6,122,388 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,659,156. These are earmold devices where a plug is brought into the ear canal and are typically used in hearing devices. These are not suited for mass production since each has to be adapted to each user for the stable positioning and comfortable use. This is particularly due to the opening in the ear that the ear plug is brought into differs from person to person. The outer part of the ear also differs from person to person yet these differences are not so great. Thus, using the outer shape of the ear for attachment of an ear unit only 2 or 3 different sizes will accomplish said differences.
Also an ear plug will block the ear canal and appear uncomfortable to a user. Moreover the natural production of ear wax will not escape, thus necessitating flushing of the ear at regular intervals.
References should also be made to U.S. Pat. No. 5,943,627 regarding an ear piece with built in microphone. Ear pieces for walkmen and the like are known, using the outer part of the ear for attachment, yet these have a circular shape and exploit only the lower part of the outer cavity of an ear for attachment and small differences in the size of the ear will cause said ear pieces not to fit particularly well.
References should also be made to a German utility patent DE 29718483 U1 where an inner clamp forces hoops outwardly towards the inner parts of the ear cavity in order to secure an attachment. The disadvantage is the constant outward pressure being exerted which over time can lead to discomfort.
Finally, references should also be made to the Norwegian patent NO 312 909 belonging to the applicant where a comfortable attachment is achieved by a combination of an ear unit formed as a large C placed under the tragus of the ear while further stability is assured by one part extending from the ear unit in the intertragic notch.
Based on the prior art the object of the invention is to avoid these disadvantages and limitation and simultaneously provide a further improvement in stability and comfortable attachment of an ear unit with the possibility of further functionality.
This is provided by a device according to the present invention. Further features of the invention are disclosed by the remaining dependent claims.
The shape of the ear unit keeps the ear canal to a certain degree open towards the outer environment for improved comfort when compared to a unit that closes or blocks the ear canal.
Where is embodiments of the invention will be disclosed with references to the drawings, where:
By the present invention, a larger part of the outer ear is utilized, thus achieving high stability while providing more comfort to the user than the previously known solutions. The present invention also utilizes the upper part of the antihelix 13 and the cavity covered by the lower node 15 of the antihelix and the flap 2 covering said cavity by the outer part of the ear adjacent to the head.
The ear unit 10 according to the present invention is shown schematically in
Ear unit 10 comprises a decremental curve 9 of the outer part of the ear unit corresponding to the antihelix 13 with a surface shaped in such a way that the curve falls along the inner part of the antihelix 13 and is partly positioned under antitragus 3 of the ear. The optional lower part 7 extends from the curve while providing a guide and a weight for the correct positioning of the ear unit 10 by more or less lying in the intertragic notch 14 of the ear. The upper part of the curve projects into the cavity covered by the lower node 15 of the antihelix and underneath the flap 2 covering the lower part of said cavity. Investigations show that a contiguous line in the form of a decremental curve will fit in to the ear of nearly everyone.
By use of the ear unit 10, an opening is formed between the outer periphery 16 and the wall of the ear. This means that the ends 5 and 8 of the curve project out from the casing of the ear unit 10. Likewise, the part of the ear unit 10 comprising the hearing element is retracted slightly relative to the curve, ensuring that the hearing element does not abut the auditory canal directly, allowing the formation of an opening between the auditory canal and the surroundings.
The ear unit 10 is formed with a first surface 25 facing inwardly toward the concha 22 of the ear, a second, opposite surface 23 facing outwardly from the concha 22 of the ear, and an inner circumferential surface 26, opposite to the decremental curve 9 formed between the first surface 25 and the second surface 23. The first surface 25 has a curvature 21 in such a way that it follows along the inner surface of ear mussel or concha 22 when the ear unit 10 is positioned into the ear. This contact surface provides further stability since a larger area is placed against the ear mussel or concha, and thereby increased comfort.
The ear unit 10 is optionally arranged with an incision 20 so that it positions itself into the intertragic notch 14 when the ear unit 10 is positioned in the ear. This incision provides further stability and increased comfort.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2007 2812 | Jun 2007 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO2008/000190 | 5/30/2008 | WO | 00 | 5/7/2010 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/147215 | 12/4/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1614987 | Langenbeck et al. | Jan 1927 | A |
1668910 | Jones | May 1928 | A |
1753817 | Aber | Apr 1930 | A |
2248837 | Walters | Jul 1941 | A |
2312534 | Fiene | Mar 1943 | A |
3440365 | Bryant et al. | Apr 1969 | A |
4720857 | Burris et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
5048090 | Geers | Sep 1991 | A |
5048092 | Yamagishi et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5260997 | Gattey et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5298692 | Ikeda et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
D357921 | Ming-Chin | May 1995 | S |
5450496 | Burris et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5544253 | Nagayoshi et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5659156 | Mauney et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664014 | Yamaguchi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
D384958 | Shudo | Oct 1997 | S |
5712453 | Bungardt et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5771438 | Palermo et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5799097 | Lo | Aug 1998 | A |
5809159 | Lee | Sep 1998 | A |
5912925 | Palermo et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5943627 | Kim et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5953435 | Mullin et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6021207 | Puthuff et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6122388 | Feldman | Sep 2000 | A |
6625293 | Nageno et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6688421 | Dyer et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6944287 | Mori | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6944307 | Berg | Sep 2005 | B2 |
20020096391 | Smith et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020131585 | Jones et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030174853 | Howes et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030196850 | Dyer et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040052389 | Berg | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050008180 | Smith et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060262949 | Cho et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
8328154 | Feb 1984 | DE |
3301927 | Jun 1984 | DE |
29718483 | Feb 1999 | DE |
102005044417 | Apr 2007 | DE |
2277422 | Oct 1994 | GB |
2329787 | Mar 1999 | GB |
2001-333484 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001333484 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2005-073144 | Mar 2005 | JP |
9429966 | Dec 1994 | WO |
9530320 | Nov 1995 | WO |
9623373 | Aug 1996 | WO |
9623443 | Aug 1996 | WO |
0150813 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0150813 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0245390 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 0245390 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 03034782 | Apr 2003 | WO |
03075608 | Sep 2003 | WO |
03096745 | Nov 2003 | WO |
2004100508 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2008147215 | Dec 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
An English machine translation of JP 2005-73144. 18 pages. |
White, “Asono Freebit H1 Bluetooth Headset: Be Like Lt Uhura,” dated Oct. 18, 2006, printed from http://gizmodo.com/208374/asono-freebit-h1-bluetooth-headset-be-like-lt-uhura, 2 pages. |
Ziegler, “Asono's Freebit H1 Bluetooth Headset,” dated Oct. 18, 2006, printed from http://mobile.engadget.com/2006/1O/18/asonos-freebit-ha-bluetoothheadset, 3 pages. |
German Internet article of “Freebit H1,” Veroffenticht Oct. 19, 2006, printed from http://www.golem.de/0610/48487.html, 4 pages. |
Norwegian Internet article with pictures of “Freebit H1,” dated Jan. 12, 2006, printed from www.mobilen.no/wip4/testdetail.epl?id=9008, 3 pates. |
Internet article in Dagbladet with pictures of “Asono Freebit H1,” under the headline “Nyskapende blatann-handfri,” dated Feb. 16, 2007, printed from http://www.dagbladet.no/dinside/2007/02116/492251.html, 3 pages. |
Printout from the Norwegian Patent Office online database with more specifications for NO312989, dated May 7, 2007, 31 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability re PCT/NO2008/000190, dated Dec. 1, 2009 with written opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 29, 2008, 54 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for EP08766905 dated Oct. 15, 2010, 2 pages. |
Asono, “Freebit H1 User Guide,” Jun. 30, 2007, English and Norweigan versions. |
English translation of JP Notification of Reason for Refusal and JP Office Action Summary dated Sep. 3, 2013. 4 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100278364 A1 | Nov 2010 | US |