This disclosure generally relates to earpieces for use with electronic devices, which may include one or more flexible flaps.
Earpieces can be placed within human ears, e.g., as part of earphones, Bluetooth devices, etc., to deliver sound to the ears. To enhance sound quality and the user's acoustic experience, earpieces may be configured to enhance passive noise attenuation. For example, an earpiece may substantially seal the entrance of a user's ear canal so that sound delivered to the ear does not leak to the external environment, and so other sounds, e.g., the passive noise, from the environment, are substantially blocked. In another example, an earpiece may have an incomplete seal to allow for situational awareness. The earpiece may provide a desired level of acoustic leak.
In one aspect, the disclosure features an ear tip for an earpiece. The ear tip comprises a body and two flexible flaps extending from the body. The two flexible flaps together form a generally frustro-conical shape around the body and at least part of the body is partially enclosed by the two flexible flaps.
In another aspect, the disclosure features an ear tip comprising a body, a positioning and retaining structure, and two or more flaps extending from and connected to the body. The two or more flaps form a frusto-conical shape. The positioning and retaining structure includes a member extending from the body and configured to rest against and apply outward pressure to the antihelix of a user's ear to retain the ear tip in the user's ear.
In another aspect, the disclosure features an ear tip for an earpiece. The ear tip comprises a body and two compliant flaps together forming a frusto-conical structure surrounding the body. At least part of the body is partially enclosed by the frusto-conical structure. The two flaps each has an inner perimeter connected to the body and an outer perimeter away from the body. The two flaps also each comprises two ends each extending between the inner perimeter and the outer perimeter. At least two ends of the two flaps overlap along a peripheral direction of the inner or outer perimeters in an overlapping region.
In another aspect, the disclosure features an earpiece comprising a body defining an opening as an acoustic passage to conduct sound waves, two flaps connected to the body, and an acoustic driver configured to radiate sound waves to be conducted through the acoustic passage. Each flap is flexible in response to applied force so as to enclose at least part of the body.
Embodiments of the ear tips and earpieces may include one or more of the following features. A first flap of the two flaps is smaller in size than a second flap of the two flaps. The body comprises a front part and a back part, and the first flap is connected to the body at a location such that when the ear tip is held in a human ear with the front part of the body positioned at the entrance to the ear canal, the first flap is on an inner side of the tragus of the human ear. The first flap has the shape of a portion of a first oval and has a size smaller than half of the first oval. The second flap has the shape of a portion of a second oval and has a size larger than half of the second oval. A first flap of the two flaps is connected to the body at a first inner perimeter, and has a first outer perimeter and first and second ends extending between the first inner perimeter and the first outer perimeter. A second flap of the two flaps is connected to the body at a second inner perimeter, and has a second outer perimeter and third and fourth ends extending between the second inner perimeter and the second outer perimeter. The first end overlaps with the third end along the first and second inner perimeter, and the second end overlaps with the fourth end along the first and second inner perimeter. The first and third ends are separated by a gap having a width of about 0 mm to about 1 mm at the first and second perimeters. The first and third ends are separated by a gap having a width of about 0.1 mm to about 1.6 mm at the first and second outer perimeters. Each flap has a thickness of about 0.15 mm to about 1.5 mm. The body comprises a front part and a back part, and the back part of the body comprises a surface having a first region having a round shape and one or more second, flat regions under the one or more flaps. The flaps are configured to bend towards the body so that the ends in the overlapping region slide towards each other along the peripheral direction to increase an amount of the overlap. The ear tip comprises three or more flaps. The two flaps comprise silicone. There are exactly two flaps. A first flap of the two flaps is smaller in size than a second flap of the two flaps. The two flaps each have an inner perimeter connected to the body and an outer perimeter away from the body, the flaps also each have two ends each extending between the inner perimeter and the outer perimeter, and at least two ends of the flaps overlap along a peripheral direction of the inner or outer perimeters in an overlapping region. The earpiece comprises three or more flaps that mutually engage to form a conical structure. The frusto-conical shape has an aperture angle of about 30 degrees to about 90 degrees. The ear tip comprises at least two flaps having ends overlap in an overlapping region. The positioning and retaining structure forms a consistent leak of sound external to the human ear to the human ear in the overlapping region.
Two or more of the features described in this disclosure, including those described in this summary section, may be combined to form implementations not specifically described herein.
The details of one or more implementations are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
An example earpiece includes a tip that can fit ears of different users having a range of sizes and geometries. The tip can also seal to the ears of different users, thereby enhancing user-experienced sound quality. The tip may include one or more petal flaps surrounding a body of the tip. The flap(s) can form a frusto-conical shape, which has a bottom having an oval shape. The flap(s) can also have other shapes, e.g., a bulb shape. The flap(s) can be a continuous piece of material having at least one break along the generatrix of the cone and two ends along a peripheral direction of the bottom of the frusto-conical shape. Each end may extend between a top and the bottom of the frusto-conical shape. In some implementations, two or more petal flaps having the same or different dimensions are arranged along the circumference of the tip body and in combination form the frusto-conical shape. The ends of the flap(s) can overlap along the peripheral direction.
The flap(s) can allow the tip to be inserted flexibly at different depths of the ear canals to provide an acoustic seal or acoustic coupling to the ear. In some implementations, the acoustic seal is a passive noise seal. In some implementations, the flap(s) can provide a given consistent leak into the ear canal, e.g., by tuning parameters associated with the flap(s), e.g., flap thickness(es) and air gap molded in between ends of the flap(s). The details of these parameters are discussed further below. The flaps can be configured to seal to a user's ear at the entrance of the ear canal to create a consistent coupling to the user's ear canal. The flap(s) can conform to the irregular geometry of a user's ear canal entrance by compressing outer perimeter(s) of the flaps and increasing the overlap between the ends at the outer perimeter(s). The seal to the user's ear can be formed farther out along the user's ear canal than the seal formed by a tip without the flap(s). As some users have ear canals that are sensitive, placing the tip farther out, near the entrance of the ear canal, can result in a more comfortable fit. In addition, a tip having the flap(s) can fit differently sized ears more easily than a tip without such flap(s). When adjusted along the major axis of an ear canal, the flap(s) can change their shapes to conform to the unique ear geometry and change length(s) of the outer perimeter(s). For example, the flap(s) can flexibly provide a large initial frusto-conical geometry, in which the petals are uncompressed or slightly compressed to accommodate large ears. The flap(s) can also be compressed to fit smaller ears when the ends of the flap(s) slide past one another, reducing the effective cone size.
In the example implementations described herein, the left and right earpieces mirror each other, but have the same structure and function. Features of the right earpiece are described below. The left earpiece has the same features in this example implementation.
Referring to
In some implementations, the petal flap 40 is more than half of the total size of the shape 120 and is symmetric relative to the short axis 130, 132 of the inner ellipse 122 or the outer ellipse 124. Compared to the shape 120, the flap 40 misses a portion that corresponds to a gap 134, e.g., a fan shaped gap, in the shape 120. In some implementations, the gap 134 has inner perimeter 136 corresponding to a central angle β of less than 180 degrees, e.g., about 55 degrees to about 150 degrees or about 85 degrees. The outer perimeter 138 of the gap 134 may correspond to the same central angle β or a different angle.
Referring to
The actual sizes and shapes of the petal flaps 38, 40 can vary based on various factors including, but not limited to, the sizes of user ears, earpiece material properties, e.g., hardness, of the flaps, the manufacturing processes, e.g., the ease of manufacturing, etc. For example, differently sized petal flaps can be used for different groups of users having different ear sizes. The actual sizes of an example set of petal flaps 38, 40 are shown in the mechanical drawings of
Referring to the examples of
In this example implementation, the inner perimeters 92, 126 of the flaps 38, 40 are connected to the body 34 to form the top of the frusto-conical structure 36 that surrounds the body 34. The front part 44 of the body 34 extends beyond the frusto-conical structure 36 through an opening 180 defined by the perimeters 92, 126. Referring again to
In the example shown in
For some users, the overlap between the two flaps in the end regions 164, 166 can also provide seal to an ear to reduce an amount of passive noise entering the ear canal. When the outer surfaces of the flaps 38, 40 are compressed against the ear wall, the flaps can bend towards the body 34 such that a size of the bottom 80 (see, e.g.,
In some implementations, when the main angle of a cone formed by one or more flaps becomes large, i.e., when the cone begins to look more like a disk, the tip 60 may no longer be able to properly locate itself in the ear as its proper position becomes ambiguous. In some examples, the front part 44 of the tip 60 engages the ear canal entrance beyond the sealing location of the flap portions when the tip is properly positioned in the user's ear. The nozzle can extend past the connection of flaps 40 and 38 with the body 34 and directly engage some portions of a user ear canal. This nozzle can increase the ability of the tip to be properly positioned in the ear and can allow the tip to achieve greater stability. The nozzle is sized so that it is smaller than typical ear canal opening, such that it does not create a static force on the ear canal wall. Rather, the tip is used as a locating feature during installation to help reduce fit ambiguity, which may occur when there is no such nozzle. In some implementations, the nozzle has a profile that is in the shape of an ellipse. The ellipse can have a major axis radius that ranges from about 1 mm to about 5 mm, e.g., about 3.25 mm, and a minor axis radius that ranges from about 0.5 mm to about 3 mm, e.g., about 1.25 mm. In some implementations, the nozzle can have a length that ranges from about 1 mm to about 8 mm, e.g., about 4.25 mm.
In some implementations (e.g.,
The flaps can bend by any appropriate amount. The flexibility of the flaps during compression can also allow the tip to consistently fit ears of different sizes and geometries, thereby reducing the need to customize the configuration of the tip for each user. The amount of compression and increased overlap needed or experienced by different users may be different.
The locations and orientations of the flaps 38, 40 relative to the front part 44 of the body 34 can be chosen based on different factors, including for example, manufacturing processes or sizes and geometries of user ears. In some implementations, the tip 60 can be manufactured in several (e.g., three) different sizes, one for a group of users who have relatively small ears, e.g., children, one for a group of users who have medium-sized ears, e.g., a majority of adults, and one for a group of users who have large sized ears. In addition to the arrangement of the flaps 38, 40, as described herein, the sizes and shapes of the flaps can be different for differently shaped tips.
Line A is in a plane substantially parallel to the concha plane, which can be substantially parallel to the sagittal plane. Line B is in a plane tangent to the front surface of the petal 40. Line C is in a plane tangent to the front surface of the nozzle 44. Line D is in a plane tangent to the outer perimeter 128 of the petal 40. Line E is in a plane tangent to the front surface of the petal 38.
In some implementations, the lines B and E, or the front surfaces of the petals 38, 40 form an angle of about 60° to about 180°, e.g., about 116.76° as shown in the figure as an example. This angle defines the angle of the top conical section formed by the petals and locates the petals relative to each other in this view. In some implementations, the lines A and B, or the front surface of the petal 40 and the line A, form an angle of about −30° to about 60°, e.g., about 15.38° as shown in the figure as an example. This angle locates the two petals 38, 40 on the body 34. In some implementations, the lines A and D, or the outer perimeter 128 of the petal 40 and the line 40, form an angle of about 10° to about 85°, e.g., about 48.00° in the figure as an example. In some implementations, the height of the frusto-conical structure 36 is about 1 mm to about 8 mm, e.g., about 4.66 mm as shown in the figure as an example. The height can be defined as a distance from the rearmost point on the petal 40 to the front most point on the petal 38. This distance can be measured along a line that is normal to line D or to a plane parallel to the back surface of the petal 40. In some implementations, the lines A and C, or the nozzle face and the line A, form an angle of about −20° to about 60°, e.g., about 13.00° as shown in the figure as an example.
Line F is in a plane that is substantially parallel to the plane of
In some implementations, the side angle of the conical section formed by the petals 38, 40 is about 60° to about 180°, e.g., about 141.05° as shown in the figure as an example. The side angle locates the petals 38, 40 relative to each other in this view. In some implementations, the lines F and G, or the conical surface defined by the petals and the line F, form an angle of about 45° to about 150°, e.g., about 109.00°. This angle defines the pitch of the petals 38, 40 on the body 34. In some implementations, the lines F and H, or the outer perimeter 128 of the petal 40 and the line 40, form an angle of about 45° to about 135°, e.g., about 90.00°. Similar to the view shown in
In other implementations, lines or planes other than those shown in
The shapes and the sizes of the flaps 38, 40 and the frusto-conical structure 36 can vary while still providing various advantages for various users. For example, referring to
The overlapping region(s) between ends of one or more flaps can have different features to provide different degrees of seal to the ear. For example, as described previously, the overlapping region can allow the ear to be fully sealed. When inserted in a user's ear, the ends of the flap(s) have very little to no gap in the overlapping region. Furthermore, the thickness of the flap(s) can taper down from the inner perimeter to the outer perimeter to be very thin so that the compressed flap(s) create little to no air gap at the sealing location. In some implementations, the overlapping regions can provide consistent leak paths to the ear canal. In this example, the flap thickness may increase from the inner perimeter to the outer perimeter and the gap between flaps is chosen to be larger than the gap used in a tip for providing complete seals. Along the circumference of the tip, the transition from one end of a flap to another end of flap or another end of a different flap is relatively abrupt so that there is a leak path formed between the flaps or between the flaps and the user's ear canal entrance.
Referring again to
Although two petal flaps are described with respect to
In other examples, more than two, e.g., three, four, five, or more, petal flaps can be used in a single earpiece. For example,
In use, the earpiece 20 of
An example process in which an earpiece is placed and held in an ear is explained in connection with
The earpiece 20 is then rotated clockwise as indicated by arrow 41 until one or more conditions occur so that the earpiece cannot be further rotated. The conditions can include, e.g.: an extremity 72 of the tip contacting the base of the helix; the inner leg 24 contacting the base of the helix; or the extremity 72 becoming wedged behind the anti-helix in the cymba concha region. Though the positioning and retaining structure provides all three conditions (hereinafter referred to as “modes)”, not all three conditions will or need to occur for all users, but at least one of the modes will occur for most users. Which condition(s) occur(s) is dependent on the size and geometry of the user's ears.
Rotating the earpiece clockwise can cause the extremity 72 and the outer leg 22 to engage the cymba concha region and seat beneath the anti-helix of the ear 70. When the tip and the positioning and retaining structure 28 are in place, the positioning and retaining structure and/or body contact the ear of most people in at least two, and in some people more, of several ways: a length 74 of the outer leg 22 contacts the anti-helix at the rear of the concha; the extremity 72 of the positioning and retaining structure 28 is underneath the anti-helix; portions of the outer leg 22 or the tip 60 or both are underneath the anti-tragus; and the tip 60 contacts at the entrance to the ear canal under the tragus. The two or more points of contact hold the earpiece in position for many users, providing greater stability for such users. The distribution of force, and the compliance of the portions of the body and the outer leg that contact the ear may lessen pressure on the ear and result in a more comfortable fit.
It may be desirable to place the earpiece in the ear so that it is oriented properly, so that it is stable (that is, stays in the ear), so that it is comfortable, and, for some applications so that it provides significant passive attenuation of ambient noise. One way of providing stability and proper orientation is described above and is described more completely in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/860,531, incorporated herein by reference.
Elements of different implementations described herein may be combined to form other embodiments not specifically set forth above. Elements may be left out of the structures described herein without adversely affecting their operation. Furthermore, various separate elements may be combined into one or more individual elements to perform the functions described herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
588099 | Blount | Aug 1897 | A |
931768 | Kirkpatrick | Aug 1909 | A |
1564474 | Fensky | Dec 1925 | A |
1614987 | Langbeck et al. | Jan 1927 | A |
1668890 | Curran et al. | May 1928 | A |
1688910 | Winship | Oct 1928 | A |
1753817 | Aber | Apr 1930 | A |
1893143 | Koch | Jan 1933 | A |
1969559 | Kelly | Aug 1934 | A |
2437490 | Watson | Mar 1948 | A |
2487038 | Baum | Aug 1949 | A |
2521414 | Schier | Sep 1950 | A |
2538339 | Thomas | Jan 1951 | A |
2545731 | French | Mar 1951 | A |
2763334 | Starkey | Sep 1956 | A |
2908343 | Hummert | Oct 1959 | A |
3053061 | French | Sep 1962 | A |
3157245 | Bernstein | Nov 1964 | A |
D221442 | Feingold | Aug 1971 | S |
3935401 | Shore et al. | Jan 1976 | A |
4010820 | Johnson | Mar 1977 | A |
4055233 | Huntress | Oct 1977 | A |
4219018 | Draper, Jr. | Aug 1980 | A |
D266590 | Bennett | Oct 1982 | S |
4353364 | Woods | Oct 1982 | A |
D274814 | Tang | Jul 1984 | S |
4540063 | Ochi et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4646872 | Kamon et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4870688 | Voroba et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4896679 | St. Pierre | Jan 1990 | A |
D316550 | Sogabe | Apr 1991 | S |
D318670 | Taniguchi | Jul 1991 | S |
5048090 | Geers | Sep 1991 | A |
5055233 | Borland et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
D326655 | Iribe | Jun 1992 | S |
5222151 | Nagayoshi et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5449865 | Desnick et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5548643 | Dalgleish et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5625171 | Marshall | Apr 1997 | A |
5654530 | Sauer et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5668354 | Falco | Sep 1997 | A |
D388093 | Frengley | Dec 1997 | S |
5712453 | Bungardt et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5727566 | Leight | Mar 1998 | A |
5887070 | Iseberg et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5957136 | Magidson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6022311 | Juneau et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
D430139 | Peters et al. | Aug 2000 | S |
D430547 | Yoon | Sep 2000 | S |
D430860 | Yoon | Sep 2000 | S |
6129175 | Tutor et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6241041 | Leight | Jun 2001 | B1 |
RE37398 | Nageno | Oct 2001 | E |
6449374 | Skulley et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
D469755 | Hlas et al. | Feb 2003 | S |
D470122 | Hlas et al. | Feb 2003 | S |
D470123 | Hlas et al. | Feb 2003 | S |
D470128 | Hlas et al. | Feb 2003 | S |
D470129 | Hlas et al. | Feb 2003 | S |
D471537 | Ham | Mar 2003 | S |
D471890 | Clarkson | Mar 2003 | S |
D473204 | Tanio | Apr 2003 | S |
D478991 | Dyer et al. | Aug 2003 | S |
6690807 | Meyer | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6795718 | Bae | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6819762 | Jones et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6820717 | Fleming et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6856690 | Skulley | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6868284 | Bae | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879697 | Topholm | Apr 2005 | B2 |
D505132 | Linville et al. | May 2005 | S |
6944307 | Berg | Sep 2005 | B2 |
D510574 | Okada | Oct 2005 | S |
6961440 | Schlaegel | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7050599 | Baskerville | May 2006 | B2 |
7068803 | Kuhlmann et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
D525962 | Elson | Aug 2006 | S |
D538271 | Kim et al. | Mar 2007 | S |
7233676 | Bayer | Jun 2007 | B2 |
D558735 | Carr et al. | Jan 2008 | S |
7340075 | Bayer | Mar 2008 | B2 |
D566099 | Komiyama | Apr 2008 | S |
D566691 | Andre et al. | Apr 2008 | S |
D568302 | Oh | May 2008 | S |
D569841 | Chung et al. | May 2008 | S |
7394910 | Smith et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
D575277 | Gaarde et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
D575772 | Schultz et al. | Aug 2008 | S |
7412068 | Bayer | Aug 2008 | B2 |
D578507 | Ando | Oct 2008 | S |
D578508 | Wang | Oct 2008 | S |
D579006 | Kim et al. | Oct 2008 | S |
D582389 | Bose et al. | Dec 2008 | S |
D582397 | Christopher | Dec 2008 | S |
D582398 | Nam et al. | Dec 2008 | S |
D582889 | Bose et al. | Dec 2008 | S |
D584284 | Carr et al. | Jan 2009 | S |
D584294 | Nam et al. | Jan 2009 | S |
D585881 | Nam et al. | Feb 2009 | S |
D588099 | Yuyama | Mar 2009 | S |
D589945 | Esses | Apr 2009 | S |
7536008 | Howes et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
D596164 | Henning | Jul 2009 | S |
D601134 | Elabidi et al. | Sep 2009 | S |
D602476 | Lee et al. | Oct 2009 | S |
7600604 | Babcock et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
D605170 | Keinanen | Dec 2009 | S |
D605628 | Ando | Dec 2009 | S |
7627131 | Nielsen et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
D607875 | Pedersen, II | Jan 2010 | S |
D618219 | Burgett et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D618221 | Fahrendorff et al. | Jun 2010 | S |
D620927 | Li | Aug 2010 | S |
D621817 | Brickstad | Aug 2010 | S |
D622265 | Rye | Aug 2010 | S |
D622704 | Fahrendorff et al. | Aug 2010 | S |
7778410 | Liu et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7778435 | Smith et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
D628188 | Koch | Nov 2010 | S |
7886745 | Purcell et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
D633481 | Chen | Mar 2011 | S |
D634305 | Hoggarth | Mar 2011 | S |
7949127 | Pedersen et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
D640670 | Rye | Jun 2011 | S |
7965855 | Ham | Jun 2011 | B1 |
D641008 | Lee et al. | Jul 2011 | S |
D641747 | Gisborne | Jul 2011 | S |
D645458 | Silvestri et al. | Sep 2011 | S |
8121325 | Atamaniuk et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8208676 | Murozaki et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8249287 | Silvestri et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8252621 | Basol | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8254621 | Silvestri et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8270648 | Murozaki | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8280093 | Siahaan et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8311253 | Silvestri et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8355522 | Annunziato et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8600096 | Lin | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8638970 | Burton | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20020096391 | Smith et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020172386 | Bayer | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030091210 | Baskerville | May 2003 | A1 |
20030174853 | Howes et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040045558 | Taylor et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040163653 | Fleming | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050008180 | Smith et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050147269 | Oliveira et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060067556 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060177080 | Smith | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060188122 | Smith | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060215864 | Espersen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070116309 | Smith | May 2007 | A1 |
20070183615 | Wurfel | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070254725 | Smith | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080085030 | Smith | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080159577 | Smith | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181441 | Smith | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080247561 | Smith | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090092269 | Nielsen et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090101433 | Stiehl et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090123010 | Cano et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090141923 | Smith | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090180654 | Nielsen | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090202094 | Ammitzboll et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090226025 | Howes et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090323993 | Slemming et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100086158 | Oberlander | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100098281 | Urso et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100278364 | Berg | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110051979 | Lee et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110091061 | Von Dombrowski et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110268308 | Vasquez | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130148838 | Silvestri et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130230204 | Monahan et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130315410 | Annunziato et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140079273 | Silvestri et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140294214 | Zhao et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2689100 | Dec 2008 | CA |
351644 | Apr 1922 | DE |
8328154 | Feb 1984 | DE |
29718483 | Feb 1999 | DE |
202011002165 | May 2011 | DE |
368125 | May 1990 | EP |
786241 | Jul 1997 | EP |
1355508 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1377113 | Jan 2004 | EP |
1448014 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1594340 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1874080 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2437802 | Apr 1980 | FR |
239478 | May 1926 | GB |
365962 | Jan 1932 | GB |
S58-104077 | Jul 1983 | JP |
07-115695 | May 1995 | JP |
07-170591 | Jul 1995 | JP |
08-172691 | Jul 1996 | JP |
10-066181 | Mar 1998 | JP |
11-308685 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000115876 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2001333484 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002058086 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2005184579 | Jul 2005 | JP |
3159710 | May 2010 | JP |
328038 | Nov 2009 | NO |
9637052 | Nov 1996 | WO |
9939544 | Aug 1999 | WO |
0150813 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0150993 | Jul 2001 | WO |
0245390 | Jun 2002 | WO |
03075608 | Sep 2003 | WO |
2004068896 | Aug 2004 | WO |
2004100508 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2006084172 | Aug 2006 | WO |
2006104981 | Oct 2006 | WO |
2007028659 | Mar 2007 | WO |
2007044766 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2008147215 | Apr 2008 | WO |
WO 2008051307 | May 2008 | WO |
2008086286 | Jul 2008 | WO |
2009018825 | Feb 2009 | WO |
2009030229 | Mar 2009 | WO |
2009077145 | Jun 2009 | WO |
2009153221 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010031775 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010040370 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010040350 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010040351 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010-040350 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010-040351 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2011007448 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2011076246 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO 2013016336 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO 2013180571 | Dec 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2015/022767; Jul. 1, 2015; 17 pp. |
Why Use Parylene Coatings?, Parylene Engineering (2010). |
NuSil Technology Releases Low Coefficient of Friction Silicon Coating for Healthcare Applications, Special Chem. (2010). |
Types and Properties of Moldable Silicone Rubber, Albright Technologies, Inc. (2011). |
Coefficients of Friction for Teflon (2004). |
Acheson, Emralon 8301 Product Data Sheet, retrieved from the Internet on May 23, 2013: http://henkelcorp.com/industrial/product-search-1554.thm?nodeid=8798045667329. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150281819 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |