Earth-boring tools including shaped cutting elements, and related methods

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9458674
  • Patent Number
    9,458,674
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 14, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 4, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
A cutting element for an earth-boring tool. The cutting element comprises a substrate base, and a volume of polycrystalline diamond material on an end of the substrate base. The volume of polycrystalline diamond material comprises a generally conical surface, an apex centered about a longitudinal axis extending through a center of the substrate base, a flat cutting surface extending from a first point at least substantially proximate the apex to a second point on the cutting element more proximate a lateral side surface of the substrate base. Another cutting element is disclosed, as are a method of manufacturing and a method of using such cutting elements.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

Embodiments of the present invention relate generally to cutting elements that include a table of superabrasive material (e.g., polycrystalline diamond or cubic boron nitride) formed on a substrate, to earth-boring tools including such cutting elements, and to methods of forming and using such cutting elements and earth-boring tools.


BACKGROUND

Earth-boring tools are commonly used for forming (e.g., drilling and reaming) bore holes or wells (hereinafter “wellbores”) in earth formations. Earth-boring tools include, for example, rotary drill bits, core bits, eccentric bits, bicenter bits, reamers, underreamers, and mills.


Different types of earth-boring rotary drill bits are known in the art including, for example, fixed-cutter bits (which are often referred to in the art as “drag” bits), rolling-cutter bits (which are often referred to in the art as “rock” bits), diamond-impregnated bits, and hybrid bits (which may include, for example, both fixed cutters and rolling cutters). The drill bit is rotated and advanced into the subterranean formation. As the drill bit rotates, the cutters or abrasive structures thereof cut, crush, shear, and/or abrade away the formation material to form the wellbore.


The drill bit is coupled, either directly or indirectly, to an end of what is referred to in the art as a “drill string,” which comprises a series of elongated tubular segments connected end-to-end that extends into the wellbore from the surface of the formation. Often various tools and components, including the drill bit, may be coupled together at the distal end of the drill string at the bottom of the wellbore being drilled. This assembly of tools and components is referred to in the art as a “bottom hole assembly” (BHA).


The drill bit may be rotated within the wellbore by rotating the drill string from the surface of the formation, or the drill bit may be rotated by coupling the drill bit to a downhole motor, which is also coupled to the drill string and disposed proximate the bottom of the wellbore. The downhole motor may comprise, for example, a hydraulic Moineau-type motor having a shaft, to which the drill bit is attached, that may be caused to rotate by pumping fluid (e.g., drilling mud or fluid) from the surface of the formation down through the center of the drill string, through the hydraulic motor, out from nozzles in the drill bit, and back up to the surface of the formation through the annular space between the outer surface of the drill string and the exposed surface of the formation within the wellbore.


Rolling-cutter drill bits typically include three roller cones attached on supporting bit legs that extend from a bit body, which may be formed from, for example, three bit head sections that are welded together to form the bit body. Each bit leg may depend from one bit head section. Each roller cone is configured to spin or rotate on a bearing shaft that extends from a bit leg in a radially inward and downward direction from the bit leg. The cones are typically formed from steel, but they also may be formed from a particle-matrix composite material (e.g., a cermet composite such as cemented tungsten carbide). Cutting teeth for cutting rock and other earth formations may be machined or otherwise formed in or on the outer surfaces of each cone. Alternatively, receptacles are formed in outer surfaces of each cone, and inserts formed of hard, wear resistant material are secured within the receptacles to form the cutting elements of the cones. As the rolling-cutter drill bit is rotated within a wellbore, the roller cones roll and slide across the surface of the formation, which causes the cutting elements to crush and scrape away the underlying formation.


Fixed-cutter drill bits typically include a plurality of cutting elements that are attached to a face of bit body. The bit body may include a plurality of wings or blades, which define fluid courses between the blades. The cutting elements may be secured to the bit body within pockets formed in outer surfaces of the blades. The cutting elements are attached to the bit body in a fixed manner, such that the cutting elements do not move relative to the bit body during drilling. The bit body may be formed from steel or a particle-matrix composite material (e.g., cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide). In embodiments in which the bit body comprises a particle-matrix composite material, the bit body may be attached to a metal alloy (e.g., steel) shank having a threaded end that may be used to attach the bit body and the shank to a drill string. As the fixed-cutter drill bit is rotated within a wellbore, the cutting elements scrape across the surface of the formation and shear away the underlying formation.


Impregnated diamond rotary drill bits may be used for drilling hard or abrasive rock formations such as sandstones. Typically, an impregnated diamond drill bit has a solid head or crown that is cast in a mold. The crown is attached to a steel shank that has a threaded end that may be used to attach the crown and steel shank to a drill string. The crown may have a variety of configurations and generally includes a cutting face comprising a plurality of cutting structures, which may comprise at least one of cutting segments, posts, and blades. The posts and blades may be integrally formed with the crown in the mold, or they may be separately formed and attached to the crown. Channels separate the posts and blades to allow drilling fluid to flow over the face of the bit.


Impregnated diamond bits may be formed such that the cutting face of the drill bit (including the posts and blades) comprises a particle-matrix composite material that includes diamond particles dispersed throughout a matrix material. The matrix material itself may comprise a particle-matrix composite material, such as particles of tungsten carbide, dispersed throughout a metal matrix material, such as a copper-based alloy.


It is known in the art to apply wear-resistant materials, such as “hardfacing” materials, to the formation-engaging surfaces of rotary drill bits to minimize wear of those surfaces of the drill bits cause by abrasion. For example, abrasion occurs at the formation-engaging surfaces of an earth-boring tool when those surfaces are engaged with and sliding relative to the surfaces of a subterranean formation in the presence of the solid particulate material (e.g., formation cuttings and detritus) carried by conventional drilling fluid. For example, hardfacing may be applied to cutting teeth on the cones of roller cone bits, as well as to the gage surfaces of the cones. Hardfacing also may be applied to the exterior surfaces of the curved lower end or “shirttail” of each bit leg, and other exterior surfaces of the drill bit that are likely to engage a formation surface during drilling.


The cutting elements used in such earth-boring tools often include polycrystalline diamond cutters (often referred to as “PCDs”), which are cutting elements that include a polycrystalline diamond (PCD) material. Such polycrystalline diamond cutting elements are formed by sintering and bonding together relatively small diamond grains or crystals under conditions of high temperature and high pressure in the presence of a catalyst (such as, for example, cobalt, iron, nickel, or alloys and mixtures thereof) to form a layer of polycrystalline diamond material on a cutting element substrate. These processes are often referred to as high temperature/high pressure (or “HTHP”) processes. The cutting element substrate may comprise a cermet material (i.e., a ceramic-metal composite material) such as, for example, cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide. In such instances, the cobalt (or other catalyst material) in the cutting element substrate may be drawn into the diamond grains or crystals during sintering and serve as a catalyst material for forming a diamond table from the diamond grains or crystals. In other methods, powdered catalyst material may be mixed with the diamond grains or crystals prior to sintering the grains or crystals together in an HTHP process.


Upon formation of a diamond table using an HTHP process, catalyst material may remain in interstitial spaces between the grains or crystals of diamond in the resulting polycrystalline diamond table. The presence of the catalyst material in the diamond table may contribute to thermal damage in the diamond table when the cutting element is heated during use due to friction at the contact point between the cutting element and the formation. Polycrystalline diamond cutting elements in which the catalyst material remains in the diamond table are generally thermally stable up to a temperature of about 750° Celsius, although internal stress within the polycrystalline diamond table may begin to develop at temperatures exceeding about 350° Celsius. This internal stress is at least partially due to differences in the rates of thermal expansion between the diamond table and the cutting element substrate to which it is bonded. This differential in thermal expansion rates may result in relatively large compressive and tensile stresses at the interface between the diamond table and the substrate, and may cause the diamond table to delaminate from the substrate. At temperatures of about 750° Celsius and above, stresses within the diamond table may increase significantly due to differences in the coefficients of thermal expansion of the diamond material and the catalyst material within the diamond table itself. For example, cobalt thermally expands significantly faster than diamond, which may cause cracks to form and propagate within the diamond table, eventually leading to deterioration of the diamond table and ineffectiveness of the cutting element.


In order to reduce the problems associated with different rates of thermal expansion in polycrystalline diamond cutting elements, so-called “thermally stable” polycrystalline diamond (TSD) cutting elements have been developed. Such a thermally stable polycrystalline diamond cutting element may be formed by leaching the catalyst material (e.g., cobalt) out from interstitial spaces between the diamond grains in the diamond table using, for example, an acid. All of the catalyst material may be removed from the diamond table, or only a portion may be removed. Thermally stable polycrystalline diamond cutting elements in which substantially all catalyst material has been leached from the diamond table have been reported to be thermally stable up to a temperatures of about 1200° Celsius. It has also been reported, however, that such fully leached diamond tables are relatively more brittle and vulnerable to shear, compressive, and tensile stresses than are non-leached diamond tables. In an effort to provide cutting elements having diamond tables that are more thermally stable relative to non-leached diamond tables, but that are also relatively less brittle and vulnerable to shear, compressive, and tensile stresses relative to fully leached diamond tables, cutting elements have been provided that include a diamond table in which only a portion of the catalyst material has been leached from the diamond table.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

While the specification concludes with claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming what are regarded as embodiments of the present invention, various features and advantages of this invention may be more readily ascertained from the following description of example embodiments of the invention provided with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a side perspective view of an embodiment of a cutting element of the invention;



FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the cutting element shown in FIG. 1, taken from a viewpoint approximately forty-five degrees (45°) clockwise of that of FIG. 1;



FIG. 3 is a front perspective view of the cutting element shown in FIG. 1, taken from a viewpoint approximately ninety degrees (90°) clockwise of that of FIG. 1;



FIG. 4 is a side perspective view of another embodiment of a cutting element of the invention;



FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the cutting element shown in FIG. 4, taken from a viewpoint approximately forty-five degrees (45°) clockwise of that of FIG. 4;



FIG. 6 is a front perspective view of the cutting element shown in FIG. 4, taken from a viewpoint approximately ninety degrees (90°) clockwise of that of FIG. 4;



FIG. 7 is a perspective view of an embodiment of a fixed-cutter earth-boring rotary drill bit of the invention that includes cutting elements as described herein;



FIG. 8 is a front view of an embodiment of a roller cone earth-boring rotary drill bit of the invention that includes cutting elements as described herein;



FIGS. 9 and 10 are side perspective views of different embodiments of cutting elements of the invention wherein the cutting elements are mounted on a drilling tool and provided with a negative physical back rake angle (e.g., physical forward rake) and a negative effective back rake angle (e.g., effective forward rake) relative to a formation surface;



FIGS. 11 and 12 are side perspective views of different embodiments of cutting elements of the invention wherein the cutting elements are mounted on a drilling tool and provided with a positive physical back rake angle (e.g., physical back rake) and a positive effective back rake angle (e.g., effective back rake) relative to a formation surface;



FIGS. 13 and 14 are side perspective views of different embodiments of cutting elements of the invention wherein the cutting elements are mounted on a drilling tool and provided with a neutral physical back rake angle (e.g., physical neutral rake) and a positive effective back rake angle (e.g., effective back rake) relative to a formation surface;



FIGS. 15 and 16 are side perspective views of different embodiments of cutting elements of the invention wherein the cutting elements are mounted on a drilling tool and provided with a negative physical back rake angle (e.g., physical forward rake) and a positive effective back rake angle (e.g., effective back rake) relative to a formation surface; and



FIGS. 17 and 18 are side perspective views of different embodiments of cutting elements of the invention wherein the cutting elements are mounted on a drilling tool and provided with a negative physical back rake angle (e.g., physical forward rake) and a neutral effective back rake angle (e.g., effective neutral rake) relative to a formation surface.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The illustrations presented herein are not meant to be actual views of any particular cutting element, earth-boring tool, or portion of a cutting element or tool, but are merely idealized representations which are employed to describe embodiments of the present invention. Additionally, elements common between figures may retain the same numerical designation.


As used herein, the term “earth-boring tool” means and includes any tool used to remove formation material and form a bore (e.g., a wellbore) through the formation by way of the removal of the formation material. Earth-boring tools include, for example, rotary drill bits (e.g., fixed-cutter or “drag” bits and roller cone or “rock” bits), hybrid bits including both fixed cutters and roller elements, coring bits, percussion bits, bi-center bits, reamers (including expandable reamers and fixed-wing reamers), and other so-called “hole-opening” tools.


As used herein, the term “apex,” when used in relation to a shaped cutting element, means and includes the most distant point on a cutting tip of a shaped cutting element relative to a center of a basal surface on an opposing side of the cutting element.


Referring to FIGS. 1-3, an embodiment of the present disclosure includes a cutting element 10 having a longitudinal axis 11, a substrate base 12, and a cutting tip 13. The substrate base 12 may have a generally cylindrical shape. The longitudinal axis 11 may extend through a center of the substrate base 12 in an orientation that may be at least substantially parallel to a lateral side surface 14 of the substrate base 12 (e.g., in an orientation that may be perpendicular to a generally circular cross-section of the substrate base 12). The lateral side surface 14 of the substrate base may be coextensive and continuous with a generally cylindrical lateral side surface 15 of the cutting tip 13. The cutting tip 13 also includes a generally conical surface 16, an apex 17, and a flat cutting surface 18. A portion of the generally conical surface 16 may extend between the edge of the flat cutting surface 18 and the generally cylindrical lateral side surface 15. The generally conical surface 16 may be defined by an angle φ1 existing between the generally conical surface 16 and a phantom line extending from the generally cylindrical lateral side surface 15 of the cutting tip 13. The angle φ1 may be within a range of from about thirty degrees (30°) to about sixty degrees (60°). The generally conical surface 16 may extend from the generally cylindrical lateral side surface 15 to the apex 17, and may extend to the edges of the flat cutting surface 18. The location of the apex 17 may be centered about the longitudinal axis 11. The flat cutting surface 18 may extend from a location at least substantially proximate the apex 17 to a location on the cutting element 10 at a selected or predetermined distance from the apex 17, such that an angle α1 between the longitudinal axis 11 and the flat cutting surface 18 may be within a range of from about fifteen degrees (15°) to about ninety degrees (90°). Portions of the cutting tip 13, such as the flat cutting surface 18, may be polished.


In FIGS. 1-3, the angle φ1 is about thirty degrees (30°), the apex 17 of the cutting tip 13 is centered about the longitudinal axis 11, and the flat cutting surface 18 extends from the apex 17 to the lateral side surface 14 of the substrate base 12. In turn, the angle α1 is less than thirty degrees (30°). FIG. 1 illustrates a side perspective view of the cutting element 10 showing the non-symmetrical configuration of the cutting tip 13 about the longitudinal axis 11. FIG. 2, which is a perspective view of the cutting element 10 taken from a viewpoint approximately 45 degrees clockwise of that of FIG. 1, shows the flat cutting surface 18 of the cutting tip 13. FIG. 3 illustrates a front perspective view of the cutting element 10, taken from a viewpoint approximately ninety degrees (90°) clockwise of that of FIG. 1, in which the cutting tip 13 is symmetrical about the longitudinal axis 11.


Referring to FIGS. 4-6, another embodiment of the present disclosure includes a cutting element 20 having a longitudinal axis 21, a substrate base 22, and a cutting tip 23. The substrate base 22 may have a generally cylindrical shape. The longitudinal axis 21 may extend through a center of the substrate base 22 in an orientation that may be at least substantially parallel to a lateral side surface 24 of the substrate base 22 (e.g., in an orientation that may be perpendicular to a generally circular cross-section of the substrate base 22). The lateral side surface 24 of the substrate base 22 may be coextensive and continuous with a generally cylindrical lateral side surface 25 of the cutting tip 23. The cutting tip 23 also includes a generally conical surface 26, an apex 27, and a flat cutting surface 28. A portion of the generally conical surface 26 may extend between the edge of the flat cutting surface 28 and the generally cylindrical lateral side surface 25 of the cutting tip 23. The generally conical surface 26 may be defined by an angle (1)2 existing between the generally conical surface 26 and a phantom line extending from the generally cylindrical lateral side surface 25 of the cutting tip 23. The angle φ2 may be within a range of from about thirty degrees (30°) to about sixty degrees (60°). The generally conical surface 26 may extend from the generally cylindrical lateral side surface 25 to the apex 27, and may extend to the edges of the flat cutting surface 28. The location of the apex 27 may be offset from the longitudinal axis 21. The flat cutting surface 28 may extend from a location at least substantially proximate the apex 27 to a location on the cutting element 20 at a selected or predetermined distance from the apex 27, such that an angle α2 between the longitudinal axis 21 and the flat cutting surface 28 may be within a range of from about fifteen degrees (15°) to about ninety degrees (90°). Portions of the cutting tip 23, such as the flat cutting surface 28, may be polished.


In FIGS. 4-6 the angle φ2 is about thirty degrees (30°), the apex 27 is offset from the longitudinal axis 21, and the flat cutting surface 28 extends from the apex 27 to a location on the generally conical surface 26 of the cutting tip 23. The angle α2 is about sixty degrees (60°). The viewing angles represented by FIGS. 4-6 correspond, respectively, to those of FIGS. 1-3.


Each of the cutting tips 13 and 23 may comprise a polycrystalline diamond (PCD) material. Certain regions of the cutting tips 13 and 23, or the entire cutting tips 13 and 23, optionally may be processed (e.g., etched) to remove metal binder from between the interbonded diamond grains of the PCD material of each of the cutting tips 13 and 23, such that each of the cutting tips 13 and 23 are relatively more thermally stable. Each of the cutting tips 13 and 23 may be formed on their respective substrate bases 12 and 22, or each of the cutting tips 13 and 23 and their respective substrate bases 12 and 22 may be separately formed and subsequently attached together. Each of the substrate bases 12 and 22 may be formed from a material that is relatively hard and resistant to wear. As one non-limiting example, the substrate bases 12 and 22 may be at least substantially comprised of a cemented carbide material, such as cobalt-cemented tungsten carbide. Optionally, the cutting tips 13 and 23 may be formed for use without the respective substrate bases 12 and 22 (e.g., the substrate bases 12 and 22 may be omitted from the respective cutting elements 10 and 20). Optionally, an entirety of the cutting elements 10 and 20 (e.g., the cutting tips 13 and 23, and the substrate bases 12 and 22) may comprise a PCD material.


Each of the cutting elements 10 and 20 may be attached to an earth-boring tool such that the respective cutting tips 13 and 23 will contact a surface of a subterranean formation within a wellbore during a drilling or reaming process. FIG. 7 is a simplified perspective view of a fix-cutter rotary drill bit 100, which includes a plurality of the cutting elements 10 and 20 attached to blades 101 on the body of the drill bit 100. In additional embodiments, the drill bit 100 may include only cutting elements 10. In yet further embodiments, the drill bit 100 may include only cutting elements 20. FIG. 8 is a simplified front view of a roller cone rotary drill bit 200, which includes a plurality of the cutting elements 10 and 20 attached to roller cones 201 thereof. In additional embodiments, the drill bit 200 may include only cutting elements 10. In yet further embodiments, the drill bit 200 may include only cutting elements 20.


Referring to FIGS. 9-18, the cutting elements 10 and 20 may each be attached to a portion 400 of the earth-boring tool such that at least a portion of the respective flat cutting surfaces 18 and 28 contact a surface 300 of the subterranean formation within the wellbore. The portion 400 of the earth-boring tool may be a portion of a fixed cutter earth-boring rotary drill bit, such as the drill bit 100 depicted in FIG. 7, or a portion of a roller cone earth-boring rotary drill bit, such as the drill bit 200 depicted in FIG. 8. A shape and configuration of each of the cutting elements 10 and 20 may enable versatility in orienting each of the cutting elements 10 and 20 relative to the surface 300 of the subterranean formation.


Referring to FIGS. 9-18, effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 between the respective flat cutting surfaces 18 and 28 and a reference plane 500 at least substantially perpendicular to the surface 300 of the subterranean formation may be negative (i.e., effective forward rake), positive (i.e., effective back rake), or neutral (i.e., effective neutral rake). The effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 may be considered negative where the corresponding flat cutting surfaces 18 and 28 are behind the reference plane 500 in the direction of cutter movement (i.e., the flat cutting surfaces 18 and 28 form an obtuse angle with the surface 300 of the subterranean formation), as depicted in FIGS. 9 and 10. The effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 may be considered positive where the respective flat cutting surfaces 18 and 28 are ahead of the reference plane 500 in the direction of cutter movement (i.e., the flat cutting surfaces 18 and 28 form an acute angle with the surface of the subterranean formation 300), as depicted in FIGS. 11-16. The effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 may be considered neutral where the respective flat cutting surfaces 18 and 28 are parallel with the reference plane 500 (i.e., the flat cutting surfaces 18 and 28 substantially form a right angle with the surface of subterranean formation 300), as depicted in FIGS. 17 and 18. In at least some embodiments, the effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 of the corresponding cutting elements 10 and 20 may be within a range of from about thirty degrees (30°) negative back rake to about forty-five degrees (45°) positive back rake relative to the reference plane 500. Subterranean formation cuttings may be deflected over and across the flat cutting surfaces 18 and 28 in directions that may be up and away from the surface 300 of the subterranean formation.


A magnitude of each of the effective rake angles θ1 and θ2 may be at least partially determined by an orientation in which each of the respective cutting elements 10 and 20 is attached to the earth-boring tool. With continued reference to FIGS. 9-18, each of the cutting elements 10 and 20 may be attached to the earth-boring tool as to include respective physical back rake angles π1 and π2 that may be negative (i.e., physical forward rake), positive (i.e., physical back rake), or neutral (i.e., physical neutral rake). The physical back rake angles π1 and π2 may be considered negative where at least a portion of the respective longitudinal axes 11 and 21 extending through the respective cutting elements 10 and 20 are behind the reference plane 500 (i.e., the longitudinal axes 11 and 21 form an obtuse angle with the surface of the subterranean formation 300), as in depicted in FIGS. 9, 10, and 15-18 (the vertically opposite physical back rake angles π1 and π2 being marked therein). The physical back rake angles π1 and π2 may be considered positive where at least a portion of the corresponding longitudinal axes 11 and 21 extending through the cutting elements 10 and 20 are ahead the reference plane 500 (i.e., the longitudinal axes form an acute angle with the surface of the subterranean formation 300), as depicted in FIGS. 11 and 12 (the vertically opposite physical back rake angles η1 and π2 being marked therein). The physical back rake angles π1 and π2 may be considered neutral where the corresponding longitudinal axes 11 and 21 are parallel with the reference plane 500, as depicted in FIGS. 13 and 14.


The magnitude of each of the effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 may also be affected by the magnitudes of the angles α1 and α2 between the longitudinal axes 11 and 21 and the flat cutting surfaces 18 and 28, respectively. The magnitudes of the angles α1 and α2 may be influenced at least by the respective locations of the apex 17 and the apex 27 on the corresponding cutting tips 13 and 23, the length of the respective flat cutting surfaces 18 and 28, and the respective angles φ1 and φ2 between the corresponding generally conical surfaces 16 and 26 and the corresponding phantom lines extending from the generally cylindrical lateral side surfaces 15 and 25 of the cutting elements 10 and 20.


The physical back rake angles π1 and π2, the size and shape of the flat cutting surfaces 18 and 28, and the effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 of the cutting tips 13 and 23, respectively, may each be tailored to optimize the performance of the cutting elements 10 and 20 for the earth-boring tool being used and characteristics of the surface 300 of the subterranean formation 300. The non-limiting embodiments illustrated in FIGS. 9-18 include different combinations of these variables that may result in effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 of between about thirty degrees (30°) negative back rake and about forty-five degrees (45°) positive back rake of the reference plane 500.



FIGS. 9 and 10 illustrate that the cutting elements 10 and 20 may be formed and oriented on an earth-boring tool such that the corresponding physical back rake angles π1 and π2 are negative (i.e., physical forward rake) and the effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 are negative (i.e., effective forward rake). FIG. 9 shows the side perspective view of the embodiment of the cutting element 10 illustrated in FIG. 1, as oriented on the earth-boring tool to include a physical back rake angle π1 that is negative. FIG. 10 shows the side perspective view of the embodiment of the cutting element 20 illustrated in FIG. 4, as oriented on the earth-boring tool to include a physical back rake angle π2 that is negative. In embodiments including relatively larger angles α1 and α2, the corresponding effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 may be closer to neutral. In embodiments including relatively larger angles α1 and α2, the corresponding physical rake angles π1 and π2 may be more negative to facilitate effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 that are negative. Conversely, in embodiments including relatively smaller angles α1 and α2, the corresponding physical back rake angles π1 and π2 may be less negative (i.e., closer to zero degrees), while still including effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 that are negative.



FIGS. 11 and 12 illustrate that the cutting elements 10 and 20 may be formed and oriented on an earth-boring tool such that the corresponding physical back rake angles π1 and π2 are positive (i.e., physical back rake) and the respective effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 are positive (i.e., effective back rake). FIG. 11 shows the side perspective view of the embodiment of the cutting element 10 illustrated in FIG. 1, as oriented on the earth-boring tool to include a physical back rake angle π1 that is positive. FIG. 12 shows the side perspective view of the embodiment of the cutting element 20 illustrated in FIG. 4, as oriented on the earth-boring tool to include a physical back rake angle π2 that is positive. In embodiments including relatively larger angles α1 and α2, the corresponding effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 may be more positive. In embodiments including relatively larger angles α1 and α2, the corresponding physical rake angles π1 and π2 may be more negative to facilitate effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 that are within forty-five degrees (45°) of positive back rake angle relative to the reference plane 500. Conversely, in embodiments including relatively smaller angles α1 and α2, the corresponding physical rake angles π1 and π2 may be more positive while still including respective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 within forty-five degrees (45°) of positive back rake angle relative to the reference plane 500.



FIGS. 13 and 14 illustrate that cutting elements 10 and 20 may be formed and oriented on an earth-boring tool such that the corresponding effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 are positive (i.e., effective back rake), and respective physical back rake angles π1 and π2 are neutral (i.e., physical neutral rake). FIG. 13 shows the side perspective view of the embodiment of the cutting element 10 illustrated in FIG. 1, as oriented on the earth-boring tool to include a physical back rake angle π1 that is neutral. FIG. 14 shows the side perspective view of the embodiment of the cutting element 20 illustrated in FIG. 4, as oriented on the earth-boring tool to include a physical back rake angle π2 that is neutral. The magnitudes of the angles α1 and α2 may affect the sign and magnitude of the effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2. In embodiments including relatively larger angles α1 and α2, the corresponding effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 may be closer to forty-five degrees (45°) of positive back rake angle relative to the reference plane 500. In embodiments including relatively smaller angles α1 and α2, the corresponding effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 may be closer to neutral.



FIGS. 15 and 16 illustrate that cutting elements 10 and 20 may be formed and oriented on an earth-boring tool such that the corresponding the effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 are positive (i.e., effective back rake), and the respective physical back rake angles π1 and π2 are negative (i.e., physical forward rake). FIG. 15 shows the side perspective view of the embodiment of the cutting element 10 illustrated in FIG. 1, as oriented on the earth-boring tool to include a physical back rake angle π1 that is negative. FIG. 16 shows the side perspective view of the embodiment of the cutting element 20 illustrated in FIG. 4, as oriented on the earth-boring tool to include a physical back rake angle π2 that is negative. In embodiments including relatively larger angles α1 and α2, the corresponding effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 may be more positive. In embodiments including relatively larger angles α1 and α2, the corresponding physical rake angles π1 and π2 may be more negative to facilitate effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 that are about forty-five degrees (45°) of positive back rake to the reference plane 500 or less. Conversely, in embodiments including relatively smaller angles α1 and α2, the effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 may be closer to neutral. In at least some embodiments including relatively smaller angles α1 and α2, the corresponding physical back rake angles π1 and π2 may be more positive to facilitate effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 that are negative.



FIGS. 17 and 18 illustrate that cutting elements 10 and 20 may be formed and oriented on an earth-boring tool such that the corresponding the effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 are neutral (i.e., effective back rake), and the physical back rake angles π1 and π2 are negative (i.e., physical forward rake). FIG. 17 shows the side perspective view of the embodiment of the cutting element 10 illustrated in FIG. 1, as oriented on the earth-boring tool to include a physical back rake angle π1 that is negative. FIG. 18 shows the side perspective view of the embodiment of the cutting element 20 illustrated in FIG. 4, as oriented on the earth-boring tool to include a physical back rake angle π2 that is negative. In embodiments including relatively larger angles α1 and α2, the corresponding physical back rake angles π1 and π2 may be more negative to facilitate corresponding effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 that are neutral. Conversely, in embodiments including relatively smaller angles α1 and α2, the corresponding physical back rake angles π1 and π2 may be more positive to facilitate corresponding effective back rake angles θ1 and θ2 that are neutral.


The enhanced shape of the cutting elements described herein may be used to improve the behavior and durability of the cutting elements when drilling in subterranean earth formations. The shape of the cutting elements may allow the cutting element to fracture and damage the formation, while also providing increased efficiency in the removal of the fractured formation material from the subterranean surface of the wellbore. The shape of the cutting elements may be used to provide a positive, negative, or neutral effective back rake angle, regardless of whether the cutting element has a positive, negative, or neutral physical back rake angle.


While the present invention has been described herein with respect to certain embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize and appreciate that it is not so limited. Rather, many additions, deletions and modifications to the embodiments described herein may be made without departing from the scope of the invention as hereinafter claimed, including legal equivalents. In addition, features from one embodiment may be combined with features of another embodiment while still being encompassed within the scope of the invention as contemplated by the inventor.

Claims
  • 1. An earth-boring tool, comprising: at least one shaped cutting element attached to at least one structure of the earth-boring tool, the at least one shaped cutting element comprising: a substrate base attached to at least one surface of the at least one structure; anda volume of polycrystalline diamond material on an end of the substrate base, the volume of polycrystalline diamond material comprising: an apex centered about a longitudinal axis extending through a center of the substrate base;a generally conical surface extending at a first angle from the substrate base to the apex; anda flat cutting surface opposing the generally conical surface and extending at a second, different angle from a first point at least substantially proximate a center of the apex to a second point on the at least one shaped cutting element more proximate a lateral side surface of the substrate base.
  • 2. The earth-boring tool of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of blades, at least one blade of the plurality of blades comprising the at least one structure of the earth-boring tool.
  • 3. The earth-boring tool of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of roller cones, at least one roller cone of the plurality of roller cones comprising the at least one structure of the earth-boring tool.
  • 4. The earth-boring tool of claim 1, wherein the at least one shaped cutting element exhibits a negative physical back rake angle and a negative effective back rake angle.
  • 5. The earth-boring tool of claim 1, wherein the at least one shaped cutting element exhibits a negative physical back rake angle and a neutral effective back rake angle.
  • 6. The earth-boring tool of claim 1, wherein the at least one shaped cutting element exhibits a negative physical back rake angle and a positive effective back rake angle.
  • 7. The earth-boring tool of claim 1, wherein the at least one shaped cutting element exhibits a neutral physical back rake angle and a negative effective back rake angle.
  • 8. The earth-boring tool of claim 1, wherein the at least one shaped cutting element exhibits a neutral physical back rake angle and a positive effective back rake angle.
  • 9. The earth-boring tool of claim 1, wherein the at least one shaped cutting element exhibits a positive physical back rake angle and a positive effective back rake angle.
  • 10. The earth-boring tool of claim 1, wherein the at least one shaped cutting element comprises at least two shaped cutting elements, a first of the at least two shaped cutting elements exhibiting at least one of a different physical back rake angle or a different effective back rake angle than a second of the at least two shaped cutting elements.
  • 11. The earth-boring tool of claim 1, wherein the first angle is within a range of from about thirty degrees (30°) to about sixty degrees (60°) between the generally conical surface and a phantom line extending from the lateral side surface of the substrate base, and wherein the second, different angle is within a range of from about fifteen degrees (15°) to about ninety degrees (90°) between the flat cutting surface and the longitudinal axis.
  • 12. An earth-boring tool, comprising: at least one shaped cutting element attached to at least one structure of the earth-boring tool, the at least one shaped cutting element comprising: a substrate base attached to at least one surface of the at least one structure; anda volume of polycrystalline diamond material on an end of the substrate base, the volume of polycrystalline diamond material comprising: a generally conical surface;an apex offset from a longitudinal axis extending through a center of the substrate base; anda flat cutting surface extending from a first point at least substantially proximate a center of the apex to a second point on the at least one shaped cutting element more proximate a lateral side surface of the substrate base, a distance between the first point and the second point greater than a distance between the second point and the lateral side surface of the substrate base.
  • 13. The earth-boring tool of claim 12, further comprising a plurality of blades, at least one blade of the plurality of blades comprising the at least one structure of the earth-boring tool.
  • 14. The earth-boring tool of claim 12, wherein the at least one shaped cutting element exhibits a negative physical back rake angle, and either a negative effective back rake angle, a neutral effective back rake angle, or a positive effective back rake angle.
  • 15. The earth-boring tool of claim 12, wherein the at least one shaped cutting element exhibits a neutral physical back rake angle, and either a negative effective back rake angle or a positive effective back rake angle.
  • 16. The earth-boring tool of claim 12, wherein the at least one shaped cutting element exhibits a positive physical back rake angle and a positive effective back rake angle.
  • 17. The earth-boring tool of claim 12, wherein the at least one shaped cutting element comprises at least two shaped cutting elements, a first of the at least two shaped cutting elements exhibiting at least one of a different physical back rake angle or a different effective back rake angle than a second of the at least two shaped cutting elements.
  • 18. The earth-boring tool of claim 12, wherein a first angle within a range of from about thirty degrees (30°) to about sixty degrees (60°) exists between the generally conical surface and a phantom line extending from the lateral side surface of the substrate base, and wherein a second angle within a range of from about fifteen degrees (15°) to about ninety degrees (90°) exists between the flat cutting surface and the longitudinal axis.
  • 19. The earth-boring tool of claim 12, further comprising: at least one additional shaped cutting element attached to the at least one structure of the earth-boring tool, the at least one additional shaped cutting element comprising: an additional substrate base attached to the at least one surface of the at least one ether structure; andanother volume of polycrystalline diamond material on an end of the additional substrate base, the another volume of polycrystalline diamond material comprising: an additional apex centered about another longitudinal axis extending through a center of the additional substrate base;an additional generally conical surface extending at a first angle from the additional substrate base to the additional apex; andan additional flat cutting surface opposing the additional generally conical surface and extending at a second, different angle from a point at least substantially proximate a center of the additional apex to another point on the at least one additional shaped cutting element more proximate a lateral side surface of the additional substrate base.
  • 20. A method of removing material from a subterranean formation, comprising: rotating an earth-boring tool within a wellbore in the subterranean formation, the earth-boring tool comprising: at least one shaped cutting element attached to at least one structure of the earth-boring tool, the at least one shaped cutting element comprising: a substrate base attached to at least one surface of the at least one structure;a generally conical surface extending at a first angle from the substrate base to an apex; anda flat cutting surface opposing the generally conical surface and extending at a second, different angle from a first point substantially proximate a center of the apex to a second point more proximate a lateral sidewall of the substrate base, the flat cutting surface contacting a surface of the subterranean formation at an angle within a range of from about forty-five degrees (45°) to about one hundred twenty degrees (120°) during rotation of the earth-boring tool.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/204,459, filed Aug. 5, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,022,149, issued May 5, 2015, which application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/371,554, filed Aug. 6, 2010. The subject matter of this application is also related to the subject matter of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/330,757, which was filed May 3, 2010. The disclosures of the above-identified applications are hereby incorporated herein in their entirety by this reference.

US Referenced Citations (152)
Number Name Date Kind
3459073 Conover Aug 1969 A
4373593 Phaal et al. Feb 1983 A
4440247 Sartor Apr 1984 A
4471845 Jurgens Sep 1984 A
4499958 Radtke et al. Feb 1985 A
4602691 Weaver Jul 1986 A
4705124 Abrahamson et al. Nov 1987 A
4718505 Fuller Jan 1988 A
4722405 Langford, Jr. Feb 1988 A
4823892 Fuller Apr 1989 A
4832139 Minikus et al. May 1989 A
4854405 Stroud Aug 1989 A
4869330 Tibbitts Sep 1989 A
4889017 Fuller et al. Dec 1989 A
4942933 Barr et al. Jul 1990 A
4981184 Knowlton et al. Jan 1991 A
RE33757 Weaver Dec 1991 E
5172777 Siracki Dec 1992 A
5172779 Siracki et al. Dec 1992 A
5186268 Clegg Feb 1993 A
5244039 Newton Sep 1993 A
5303785 Duke Apr 1994 A
5322138 Siracki et al. Jun 1994 A
5379853 Lockwood et al. Jan 1995 A
5415244 Portwood May 1995 A
5421423 Huffstutler Jun 1995 A
5487436 Griffin Jan 1996 A
5505273 Azar Apr 1996 A
5531281 Murdock Jul 1996 A
5542485 Pessier et al. Aug 1996 A
5549171 Mensa et al. Aug 1996 A
5558170 Thigpen et al. Sep 1996 A
5592995 Scott et al. Jan 1997 A
5595252 O'Hanlon Jan 1997 A
5607024 Keith Mar 1997 A
5649604 Fuller Jul 1997 A
5697462 Grimes et al. Dec 1997 A
5706906 Jurewicz et al. Jan 1998 A
5720357 Fuller et al. Feb 1998 A
5813485 Portwood Sep 1998 A
5871060 Jensen et al. Feb 1999 A
5881828 Fischer et al. Mar 1999 A
5890552 Scott et al. Apr 1999 A
5904213 Caraway et al. May 1999 A
5957227 Besson et al. Sep 1999 A
5967246 Caraway et al. Oct 1999 A
5992547 Caraway et al. Nov 1999 A
6000483 Jurewicz et al. Dec 1999 A
6053263 Meiners Apr 2000 A
6059054 Portwood et al. May 2000 A
6089336 Nexton et al. Jul 2000 A
6092613 Caraway et al. Jul 2000 A
6098730 Scott et al. Aug 2000 A
6105694 Scott Aug 2000 A
6129161 Roberts et al. Oct 2000 A
6142250 Griffin et al. Nov 2000 A
6176333 Doster Jan 2001 B1
6202770 Jurewicz et al. Mar 2001 B1
6209420 Butcher et al. Apr 2001 B1
6227318 Siracki May 2001 B1
6241035 Portwood Jun 2001 B1
6290008 Portwood et al. Sep 2001 B1
6302224 Sherwood, Jr. Oct 2001 B1
6328117 Berzas et al. Dec 2001 B1
6332503 Pessier et al. Dec 2001 B1
6401844 Doster Jun 2002 B1
6408958 Isbell et al. Jun 2002 B1
6571891 Smith et al. Jun 2003 B1
6601662 Matthias et al. Aug 2003 B2
6612383 Desai et al. Sep 2003 B2
6615934 Mensa-Wilmot Sep 2003 B2
6739417 Smith et al. May 2004 B2
6997273 Singh Feb 2006 B2
7011169 Eason Mar 2006 B2
7025156 Caraway Apr 2006 B1
7152703 Meiners et al. Dec 2006 B2
7216565 Sherwood, Jr. et al. May 2007 B2
7546888 Cruz Jun 2009 B2
7588102 Hall et al. Sep 2009 B2
7594554 Schwefe et al. Sep 2009 B2
7628233 Hall et al. Dec 2009 B1
7641002 Hall et al. Jan 2010 B2
7690442 Portwood et al. Apr 2010 B2
7798257 Shen et al. Sep 2010 B2
7836978 Scott Nov 2010 B2
8016059 Gatell Sep 2011 B2
8028774 Hall et al. Oct 2011 B2
8061457 Hall et al. Nov 2011 B2
8205692 McDonough et al. Jun 2012 B2
8215420 Hall et al. Jul 2012 B2
8365845 Hall et al. Feb 2013 B2
8505634 Lyons et al. Aug 2013 B2
8534767 Hall et al. Sep 2013 B2
8567532 Hall et al. Oct 2013 B2
8616305 Hall et al. Dec 2013 B2
8678111 Zahradnik et al. Mar 2014 B2
8714285 Hall et al. May 2014 B2
8851207 Gavia et al. Oct 2014 B2
8960337 Hall et al. Feb 2015 B2
20030034180 Mensa-Wilmot Feb 2003 A1
20040094334 Singh May 2004 A1
20040149493 McDonough Aug 2004 A1
20040184944 Geving et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040231894 Dvorachek Nov 2004 A1
20050023043 Tufts Feb 2005 A1
20050263327 Meiners et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060131075 Cruz Jun 2006 A1
20060249309 Cruz Nov 2006 A1
20070039761 Cruz Feb 2007 A1
20070106487 Gavia et al. May 2007 A1
20070199739 Schwefe et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070261890 Cisneros Nov 2007 A1
20070272445 Cariveau et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080029312 Hall et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080035380 Hall et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080035387 Hall et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080099251 Hall et al. May 2008 A1
20080156543 McDonough et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080173482 Hall et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080179106 Gavia et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080179107 Doster Jul 2008 A1
20080179108 McClain et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080223622 Duggan et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080264695 Zahradnik et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080302575 Durairajan et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080314647 Hall et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090020339 Sherwood, Jr. Jan 2009 A1
20090051211 Hall et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090055135 Tang et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090126998 Zahradnik et al. May 2009 A1
20090133938 Hall et al. May 2009 A1
20090145669 Durairajan et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090266619 Durairajan et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090273224 Hall Nov 2009 A1
20100065338 Hall et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100065339 Hall et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100071964 Hall et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100155149 Keshavan et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100263939 Hall et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100326740 Hall et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110042150 Hall et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110083906 Hall et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110155472 Lyons et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110192651 Lyons et al. Aug 2011 A1
20120023833 Hall et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120031674 Lyons Feb 2012 A1
20120125687 Rives May 2012 A1
20120205163 Azar et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120261977 Hall et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120279785 Gavia et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130199856 Bilen et al. Aug 2013 A1
20150034394 Gavia et al. Feb 2015 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (4)
Number Date Country
2598057 Mar 2008 CA
2743526 Nov 2005 CN
972908 Jan 2005 EP
2086451 May 1982 GB
Non-Patent Literature Citations (6)
Entry
Canadian Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2807231 dated Dec. 30, 2014, 3 pages.
Bilen et al., U.S. Appl. No. 61/596,433 entitled, Shaped Cutting Elements for Earth-Boring Tools, Earth-Boring Tools Including Such Cutting Elements, and Related Methods, filed Feb. 8, 2012.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US2011/046820 dated Feb. 9, 2012, 3 pages.
International Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/046820 dated Feb. 9, 2012, 3 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2011/046820 dated Feb. 12, 2012, 4 pages.
Chinese Office Action and Search Report for Chinese application No. 201180039361.1 dated Jun. 25, 2014.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150218890 A1 Aug 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61371554 Aug 2010 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13204459 Aug 2011 US
Child 14686093 US