The present application is generally related to electronic article surveillance (EAS) tags that are attached to objects to be monitored, and more specifically, to EAS tags that have arming switches that provide an arming condition when the tags are attached to objects to be monitored. Also, the tags of the present application may be used with various electronic article surveillance (EAS) systems, including for example, an EAS system utilizing tags and deactivators featuring infrared communication for deactivation and alarming, and featuring dynamic time-based passcode modification, and other tamper resistant features.
Electronic article surveillance systems have been used for many years as a means of deterring retail shoplifting in clothing stores, electronic stores, and a myriad of other retail establishments. Generally speaking, an EAS system will begin with a tag, consisting of a durable and reliable, yet small, sensor tag which is affixed to the article to be detected in such a way that it cannot be easily removed by a customer in the store. Usually, the system depends upon the feature that the attachment mechanism is constructed such that it can only be removed by the use of a specialized tool which is only in the possession of an authorized store personnel at the checkout register or exit port for the establishment. In the event that an EAS tag is not removed from a protected article prior to exiting the store, an alarm or other signal is activated.
In many commercially available EAS systems, one or more antennas are placed at the exits and entrances to the retail location. These antennas set up zones, sometimes referred to as interrogation zones, in which an EAS tag (or marker) may be sensed. At least one antenna serves the function of sending out what is called an interrogation signal. The markers on the merchandise are affected by this signal and will respond with a signal of their own. Either the same antenna that sends out the interrogation signal or other additional antennas can sense the signals from the markers. The most effective way to do this is by stopping the broadcast of the interrogation signal to listen for the signals emanating from the markers. If a marker is sensed within the zone created by the antennas, it is presumed that an article is being removed without purchase, and alarms are set off. These alarms may be audible alarms for general broadcast or the alarms may be silent alarms in the form of a light at a check-out counter or security station, etc. Additionally, some EAS tags have onboard audible alarm generators and can generate audible alarms by themselves. These tags may produce this audible alarm when onboard logic elements determine that the tag being removed from the store, or when the larger EAS system communicates to the tag to alarm. The onboard logic elements and the larger EAS system may also cause the tag to cease to alarm under certain situations.
In order to make an EAS system effective, one must consider how to make the EAS tags tamper resistant. This is an on-going effort, because over time, thieves become more capable in learning how to defeat an EAS tag. The retailer (and the tag manufacturer) must consider how to detect and prevent tampering with the tags. The particular construction of a tag will determine how tampering is detected.
An assortment of attachment mechanisms are available in the prior art. One of the more common and more successful attachment mechanisms is an EAS hard tag, consisting of a tack which is used to physically pin the EAS tag base to the protected article. The tag base is usually constructed of a hard and durable plastic and is generally in the neighborhood of three inches long. The tag serves as a housing for an electronic signal generation means secured within the housing, and which is designed to be immune to tampering. A cap on the tack keeps the tag attached to the article.
Another common and successful method of attaching tags, or transponders, is a lanyard. One end of the lanyard is fixed in the transponder and the other end is capable of being inserted into an aperture in the transponder where it can be retained by the transponder. The lanyard can pass through an aperture on the article to be protected or may be placed around an article in a position where it cannot be simply slid off the article. The lanyard is typically constructed of material that is very difficult to break or cut, but yet, is easy to bend into place. A variation on lanyard tags passes the unfixed end of the lanyard through the body of its tag to form a loop which may be adjusted onto an object by pulling the unfixed end. A clutch in the body prevents the lanyard loop from being enlarged unless the clutch is release by an authorized person. Some tags may form more than one loop.
A common device for releasably retaining both tack shafts and lanyards is a ball clutch mechanism. The ball clutch mechanism may be constructed to release the retained item after application of a magnetic force to the tag. Other clips and clamps may also be used. Other types of tags may employ vials of ink, which may break if the tag is physically bent, thereby destroying the benefit of the theft attempt.
While tack, lanyard, and other types of tags have found wide use in protecting objects, they must remain attached to a given object to protect it. A common manner of defeating an EAS tag is to forcibly remove the tag from the object being protected. A countermeasure employed with some EAS tags is the introduction of a switch which has its state changed and arms the tag when a tag is attached to an object to be protected. This switch is often termed a plunger switch. The actuated part of the switch is a small plunger that extends from the tag at location where the object and tag interact. For example, in tags employing a tack, a switch is positioned on the tag at a location beneath the head of the tack. When the tack is inserted through an object, the object and the head of the tack bear upon the switch and change its state.
Associated devices may communicate with electronics within the EAS tag to add an additional step to the tag arming process. When the tag is attached to an object and the state of the switch changed, this change of state functions as confirmation that the tag is attached, and an authorized person can use an associated device to wirelessly communicate with the tag to complete the tag installation and arming process. Once armed, if a tag is forcibly removed, the switch's state again changes, and the electronics of the EAS tag determine that an alarm condition exists. The EAS tag can sound an audible alarm with an onboard audible alarm generator or wirelessly communicate an alarm to other elements of the EAS system.
Although the presence of a plunger switch can aid the ability to detect when a tag is attached to an object, the switch may not operate consistently. For example, if a tag is attached to an article of clothing, the plunger of the switch may merely protrude into the clothing and the state of the switch may not change. Alternatively, the tag may install properly, but with handling of the clothing, the plunger may move and change the state of the switch, causing a false alarm; a very undesirable occurrence. In other situations, the objects may be too irregularly shaped to guarantee contact with the plunger. If a recess in an irregularly shaped object coincides with the location of the switch, the switch will not detect the presence of the object, and the tag will fail to arm. Alternatively, a tag may be successfully attached to an irregular object and armed, but a small shift of the object may release the switch, which would cause the undesired false alarm. Embodiments of the present invention can work with the several prior art embodiments of EAS tags employing plunger switches to counter the deficiencies discussed above.
This application generally discloses a more reliable switch mechanism for EAS tags employing switches as part of the arming process when an EAS tag is attached to an object to be protected. The switch mechanisms in the various embodiments of the invention employ a plate with the switch so that a broader surface area is presented to contact the object being protected. This provides for more reliable operation of the switch and EAS tag. The plate attaches to the body of the tag and covers the switch and may be shaped for a particular application. This more reliable switch mechanism can be adapted to a broad range of EAS tag shapes as well as the several different types of EAS tags and system combinations.
A person of ordinary skill in the art would understand how to incorporate the improvements described herein into a conventional EAS system.
Additional utility and features of the invention will become more fully apparent to those skilled in the art by reference to the following drawings, which illustrate some of the primary features of preferred embodiments.
Tag 10 contains electronics within its body 12 and there may be several security systems and methods by which these electronics enable a tag and its associated protected article to be detected passing from a protected area, such as a retail store. Some systems employ passive EAS elements which are energized by interrogation fields generated at exits and other control points. The energized passive EAS elements generate signals which can be detected by the EAS systems, which generate alarms when it is determined that a tag is illicitly exiting a store. Other EAS systems utilize EAS tags with more sophisticated electronics on board which include microprocessors, communication elements, audible alarm generators, and other electronic elements. These more sophisticated EAS tags can store information, execute logic, and communicate with the broader EAS system. These tags may also utilize passive EAS elements.
One of the ways in which these security systems may be defeated is by forcibly removing an EAS tag from the article to which it is attached. The tag is left behind and the article may then be removed from the area without fear of electronic detection. In the prior art EAS tag 10 shown in
Tag 10 shown in
Once tag 10 is armed, if arming switch 18 is released without tag 10 being disarmed, the electronics of tag 10 determine an alarm condition and can generate an alarm. This alarm may be an audible alarm generated by an onboard audible alarm generator or it may be an alarm communicated to the overall EAS system via wireless communication. Arming switch 18 may be released by the forcible removal of shaft 24 from the clutch in body 12 of tag 10 or by breaking cap 22 from shaft 24. Tag 10 may be disarmed by the same devices that are used to arm it when it is attached to an object to be protected.
While arming switch 18 is an effective countermeasure against forced removal of EAS tag 10 from an object, it can be improved. As may be seen in
By improving the reliability of arming switch 18, an improvement may be made in EAS tags employing such a countermeasure as arming switch 18.
In some embodiments, the plate and the body may be attached to each other. Such an embodiment is shown in
When shaft 224 is inserted through an object to be protected and aperture 232 and into aperture 214, cap 222 bears down onto the object which in turn bears down upon plate 230. This moves plate 230 down onto arming switch 218 which changes the state of arming switch 218. This either arms EAS tag 210 or is one of the steps for arming EAS tag 210. When EAS tag 210 is not assembled to an object to be protected, spring 250 pushes plate 230 away from the body of EAS tag 210, while barbs 237 on assembly plugs 236 maintain plate 230 in assembly to the body of EAS tag 210. This maintains plate 230 in a position that does not engage arming switch 218.
Other elements of EAS tag 210 are shown in
Embodiments of the present invention can work with the several prior art embodiments of EAS tags employing arming switches. For instance,
The releasable attaching mechanism in some embodiments of the present invention may further comprise a ball clutch mechanism as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application No. 2006/0070410 by Fuss and Yang. In this patent, the tag has a pair of hinged components that are detachably clamped together. In some embodiments of the present invention, we can detachably clamp the body and the plate, as described in
Embodiments of the present invention may be additionally coupled with a benefit denial ink based system. A frangible ink ampoule may be incorporated into the body. When the plate and body are forcibly separated to remove a protected article, the bending and pulling on the tag causes one or more ink ampoules to rupture, leaking a staining agent onto the protected article. Such ink-based systems are often used to protect clothing items. When such an article is stained with permanent dye, the potential thief is denied the benefit of the attempted theft. Such a benefit-denial system is disclosed in U.S. Patent Application No. 2010/0315238 by Yang. Additionally, such a benefit-denial system may be designed to seal the electronics package from the ampoule so as to prevent contamination of the electronics package by the staining agent released from the ampoule. Additionally, such a benefit-denial system may be designed to remove and replace the frangible ampoule, if ruptured. Furthermore, as disclosed in U.S. Patent Application No. 2010/0315238 by Yang, the benefit-denial system may be coupled with a ball clutch mechanism.
Although specific embodiments of the invention have been described with specificity, the embodiments described should not be considered exhaustive of the possible embodiments of the invention and should not be held as limiting the scope and range of the claims. Similarly the drawings are not exhaustive depictions of embodiments of the invention and the abstract is intended to allow a person to quickly gain the general field of the invention and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the claims.
While many novel features have been described above, the invention is not limited to these physical embodiments. It is described and illustrated with particularity so that that those skilled in the art may understand all other embodiments that may arise due to modifications, changes in the placement of the relative components, omissions and substitutions of this preferred embodiment that are still nonetheless within the scope of this invention.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application 61/441,353, filed on Feb. 10, 2011. The teachings in the specification for the provisional application are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3708835 | Bienz | Jan 1973 | A |
4196424 | Williamson | Apr 1980 | A |
4263697 | Speedie | Apr 1981 | A |
4441233 | Swift | Apr 1984 | A |
4506415 | Swift | Mar 1985 | A |
5337503 | Goby | Aug 1994 | A |
5524463 | Schenkel et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5568951 | Morgan | Oct 1996 | A |
5570080 | Inoue | Oct 1996 | A |
5627520 | Grubbs et al. | May 1997 | A |
5717382 | Cooper | Feb 1998 | A |
5841349 | Holmgren | Nov 1998 | A |
5856782 | Sasagawa et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5945909 | Kolton | Aug 1999 | A |
5949336 | Deschenes et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959532 | Fujiuchi | Sep 1999 | A |
5969613 | Yeager et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5995003 | Rogers | Nov 1999 | A |
6025781 | Deschenes | Feb 2000 | A |
6052876 | Hogan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6188320 | Kolton et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6326890 | Costa | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6535130 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6624753 | Elston | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6724311 | Kolton et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731212 | Hirose | May 2004 | B2 |
D493739 | Copen | Aug 2004 | S |
D494487 | Sayegh | Aug 2004 | S |
D502419 | Copen | Mar 2005 | S |
D503900 | Sayegh | Apr 2005 | S |
D504634 | Sayegh | May 2005 | S |
D505349 | Sayegh | May 2005 | S |
6933847 | Feibelman | Aug 2005 | B2 |
D509454 | Sayegh | Sep 2005 | S |
7005989 | Benoit et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7062823 | Copen | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7148805 | Hogan | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7183914 | Norman et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7227467 | Feibelman | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7249401 | Copen et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7286055 | Girvin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7342494 | Maloney | Mar 2008 | B2 |
D566598 | Sayegh | Apr 2008 | S |
D567128 | Sayegh | Apr 2008 | S |
D578030 | Yang et al. | Oct 2008 | S |
7518521 | Feibelman et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7595733 | Spagna | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7626501 | Feibelman | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7671741 | Lax et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7724146 | Nguyen et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7808390 | Sayegh | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7969310 | Sayegh | Jun 2011 | B2 |
20090058659 | Handyside et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20100308998 | Hesch et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315237 | Yang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315238 | Yang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315239 | Yang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110115632 | Yang | May 2011 | A1 |
20110227706 | Yang | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110260594 | Yang | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110273295 | Sayegh et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120206263 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61441353 | Feb 2011 | US |