This invention relates generally to electronic article surveillance. More specifically, this invention relates to an electronic article surveillance tag comprised of two parts having features that prevent their being twisted with respect to each other, once assembled.
A common logistical concern in businesses is the tracking of assets or persons. In retail, one example of this logistical tracking concern is shoplifting. Many retail establishments employ electronic tags attached to goods that can be detected by systems installed for that purpose. A common term for these systems, tags, etc. is electronic article surveillance, or EAS.
Many of these tags and systems are only capable of registering the presence of the tag. Transmitters and receivers are located at exit points within a retail environment and the transmitter creates an interrogation zone at the exits while the receivers scan for responses from tags passing through the interrogation zone. The transmitters and receivers are typically housed in pedestals. There are several types of tags for these systems, one of which is a harmonic tag and another of which is a resonance tag. With the harmonic tag, the electromagnetic interrogation field creates stored energy in the harmonic tag, and when the interrogation field is turned off this energy dissipates from the tag and produces a signal which is a harmonic of the interrogation field. The element that stores and dissipates the energy to generate the signal is typically comprised of a ferrite core with a wire coil around it, and it can be tuned to generate a signal at a particular frequencies. The system is tuned to the expected frequencies, and the receiver antennas of the system detect these signals. When a signal is detected within an interrogation field, it is assumed that a tag is present and that it is improperly being removed from the retail facility. Similar systems may also be used to identify authorized personnel at control points, etc.
There are many ways used to attach a tag to an article being protected. For clothing and similar items, a tag incorporating a tack is frequently used. The tack has a head and shaft extending from its head, while the tag body houses a clutch and has an aperture through which the tack shaft may be inserted into the clutch. Various clutches are employed in the art, and depending on the particular clutch, the clutch may be released by mechanical means, application of a magnet to the clutch, or some clutches may be released by multiple methods.
One clutch that is frequently used is a ball clutch. In a ball clutch, a spindle is located in the interior of a tapered cup which is opened at its larger end and has an aperture through its smaller, closed end. The spindle has a shaft through it which is aligned with the aperture of the tapered cup. Both the aperture in the tapered cup and the shaft through the spindle are at least large enough to accommodate the insertion of the tack shaft. The spindle has apertures through its walls which carry ball bearings that ride on the interior of the tapered cup. When the tack shaft is inserted the spindle moves to allow shaft in, but if the shaft is pulled, the ball bearings, the tack, and tapered cup wedge. The spindle must be retracted prior to pulling the tack in order for there to be space among the elements within the tapered cup to allow the removal of the tack shaft. In many ball clutches, the spindle is at least partially made of a magnetically attractable material, which allows it to be retracted by application of a magnet.
In many applications, it is desirable that the EAS tag be as small as possible. However, due to the shapes and sizes of the internal elements, the possible arrangements of the internal elements are limited. Some of these possible arrangements result in tag shapes which are vulnerable to tampering. For example, a tag with an elongated shape can provide sufficient purchase so that the tack and body portions can be gripped and twisted to separate the two portions. The embodiments of the current invention incorporate certain anti-twisting features to prevent tampering with a compactly configured EAS tag.
Embodiments of the present invention have a tag body and a tag cap. The tag body houses a clutch and an EAS electronic element. The tag cap is cupped and generally shaped to match that of the tag body. A tack shaft extends from the concave side of the tag cap. A top panel on the tag body has an aperture through which the tack shaft is inserted into the tag body and into the clutch within the tag body. To release the clutch, a magnet is applied to the tag body opposite to the tag cap.
The shapes of the internal elements result in a tag body having an oblong shape. Unfortunately, this shape can facilitate the twisting of the tag cap and tag body with respect to each other. To frustrate the twisting the relative twisting of the two portions, the top panel in the tag body has at least one male feature extending from its surface. The tag cap has at least one female feature within its interior sized and located to accept the male features of the tag body.
These features are joined when the tag cap is assembled to the tag body, and prevent the rotation of the two portions with respect to each other. Additionally, the tag cap and tag body are so shaped that the edges of the tag cap fit the shape of the tag body to minimize any gap, further reducing opportunities for prying the portions apart.
The detailed description below of certain embodiments is intended to explain the current invention. It is to be understood that a variety of other arrangements are also possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Top panel 40 of tag body 30 is shaped to accommodate elements within the interior of tag body 30. Clutch dome 42 accommodates a clutch beneath it, while elongate dome 46 accommodates an EAS signal element beneath it. Aperture 44 provides tack shaft 21 access to the clutch. When tag cap 20 is assembled to tag body 30, elongate dome 46 extends up into tag cap 20 which provides further resistance to twisting of tag cap 20 and tag body 30 about tack shaft 21.
Turning now to
In the embodiment shown in
The interaction of male feature 48 of tag body 30 and the female feature of tag cap 20, slots 23 of ribs 22, prevents the rotation of tag cap 20 with respect to tag body 30. This prevents the two portions of Eas tag 10 from being rotated with respect to each other to acquire a better hold to force them apart. Additionally, this prevents them from being wiggled with respect to each other to work tack shaft 21 out of the clutch in tag body 30.
Referring now to
When EAS tag 10 is attached to an object to be protected by inserting tack shaft 21 of tag cap 20 into aperture 44 of tag body 30, a thief may attempt to forcibly remove tack shaft 21 from clutch 31 within tag body 30 by prying tag cap 20 from tag body 30. Alternatively, a thief may work the small end of tag cap 20 back and forth in a rotational manner to work tack shaft 21 out of clutch 31 located within tag body 30. When EAS tag 10 is handled in such a manner, peripheral break lines 25 running from the edge of tag cap 20 toward tack head 24 provide a starting point for a crack in tag cap 20 to place a limit on the amount of force transmitted to tack shaft 21. Concentric break line 26 directs a crack around tack head 24. If sufficient force is applied to tack cap 20, one or both ends of tack cap 20 may break away around tack head 24. This denies a thief effective purchase on tack head 24 for working tack shaft 21 out of clutch 44. While peripheral break lines 25 are intended to provide a crack path from the periphery of tag cap 20 to concentric break line 26, in some embodiments, or in some situations, a crack may start in concentric break line 26 and propagate around tack head 24 without initiation of the crack at the periphery of tag cap 20. In those cases, the entire shell 27 of tag cap would break off and have a hole where tack head 24 was previously. In the embodiments shown in
While the general shape of tag cap 20 and tag body 30 is oval, especially at their matching periphery, that need not be the only shape utilized. Other shapes of peripheries could be used. For example, even a circular periphery could be used as long as the tack shaft of the tag cap and the aperture of the tag body were not centered within the circular periphery.
It is to be understood that the embodiments and claims are not limited in application to the details of construction and arrangement of the components set forth in the description and illustrated in the drawings. Rather, the description and the drawings provide examples of the embodiments envisioned, but the claims are not limited to any particular embodiment or a preferred embodiment disclosed and/or identified in the specification. The drawing figures are for illustrative purposes only, and merely provide practical examples of the invention disclosed herein. Therefore, the drawing figures should not be viewed as restricting the scope of the claims to what is depicted.
The embodiments and claims disclosed herein are further capable of other embodiments and of being practiced and carried out in various ways, including various combinations and sub-combinations of the features described above but that may not have been explicitly disclosed in specific combinations and sub-combinations. Accordingly, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception upon which the embodiments and claims are based may be readily utilized as a basis for the design of other structures, methods, and systems. In addition, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purposes of description and should not be regarded as limiting the claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application 61/467,958, filed on Mar. 25, 2011. The entire disclosures contained in U.S. Provisional Application 61/467,958, including any attachments thereto, are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3708835 | Bienz | Jan 1973 | A |
4196424 | Williamson | Apr 1980 | A |
4263697 | Speedie | Apr 1981 | A |
4441233 | Swift | Apr 1984 | A |
4493739 | Fujiwara et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4494487 | Nixon | Jan 1985 | A |
4506415 | Swift | Mar 1985 | A |
5337503 | Goby | Aug 1994 | A |
5524463 | Schenkel et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5568951 | Morgan | Oct 1996 | A |
5570080 | Inoue | Oct 1996 | A |
5627520 | Grubbs et al. | May 1997 | A |
5717382 | Cooper | Feb 1998 | A |
5856782 | Sasagawa et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5945909 | Kolton | Aug 1999 | A |
5949336 | Deschenes et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959532 | Fujiuchi | Sep 1999 | A |
5969613 | Yeager et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5995003 | Rogers | Nov 1999 | A |
6025781 | Deschenes | Feb 2000 | A |
6052876 | Hogan et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6188320 | Kolton et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6326890 | Costa | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6535130 | Nguyen et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
D478828 | Yang et al. | Aug 2003 | S |
D478829 | Yang et al. | Aug 2003 | S |
6624753 | Elston | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6631629 | Fuss et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6724311 | Kolton et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731212 | Hirose | May 2004 | B2 |
D502419 | Copen | Mar 2005 | S |
D503900 | Sayegh | Apr 2005 | S |
D504634 | Sayegh | May 2005 | S |
D504839 | Sayegh | May 2005 | S |
D505349 | Sayegh | May 2005 | S |
6933847 | Feibelman | Aug 2005 | B2 |
D509454 | Sayegh | Sep 2005 | S |
7005989 | Benoit et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7062823 | Copen | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7183914 | Norman et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7190272 | Yang et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7227467 | Feibelman | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7249401 | Copen | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7286055 | Girvin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7342495 | Sayegh | Mar 2008 | B2 |
D566598 | Sayegh | Apr 2008 | S |
D567128 | Sayegh | Apr 2008 | S |
7400254 | Yang et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
D578030 | Yang | Oct 2008 | S |
7474222 | Yang et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7518521 | Feibelman et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
D599242 | Yang | Sep 2009 | S |
7595733 | Spagna | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7626501 | Feibelman | Dec 2009 | B2 |
D612759 | Handyside | Mar 2010 | S |
7671741 | Lax et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7724146 | Nguyen et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
D624447 | Yang | Sep 2010 | S |
7808390 | Sayegh | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7969310 | Sayegh | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7990273 | Handyside et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
20050270161 | Yang et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060070410 | Fuss et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070051644 | Burdett et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070096925 | Yang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20090058659 | Handyside et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090160644 | Yang | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090289798 | Yang | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100171621 | Yang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100308998 | Hesch, Jr. et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315237 | Yang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315238 | Yang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100315239 | Yang | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110115632 | Yang | May 2011 | A1 |
20110227706 | Yang | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120241522 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61467958 | Mar 2011 | US |