The present invention relates to east-west photovoltaic module arrays.
Traditionally, solar modules have been mounted onto buildings with the modules angled to the south (when in the Northern Hemisphere). Lately, however, solar arrays have also been built with their photovoltaic modules angled in alternating rows facing to the east and west. In these “east-west” systems, the module rows are thus laid out with the array having alternating peaks and valleys (formed where the upper and lower sides of the angled modules meet one another). Surprisingly, such east-west arrays may actually generate more power over the course of the day, and also typically generate such power at more convenient times during the day. Specifically, such east-west systems lengthen power production time and eliminate traditional mid-day power spikes.
When wind passes over arrays configured with alternating peaks and valleys, low pressures are generated above the array, thereby causing lift forces on the array. Adding excessive ballast to the roof is inconvenient since the ballast must be both lifted up onto the roof and then moved around by the installers. In addition, rooftops also have weight limitations. Alternatively, fastening east-west systems directly to the roof has the disadvantage of causing roof penetrations which are expensive and potentially compromise roof integrity. Also, roofs have a maximum safe load which can limit the amount of photovoltaics used on the roof.
What is instead desired is an east-west system with improved aerodynamics (i.e.: one that generates less lift when wind passes thereover) such that excessive ballasting is not required. Preferably, such a system would also be lightweight, flexible, and fast and easy to assemble, making it easy for installers to assemble it on the roof. In addition, such a system would ideally be designed to accommodate thermal expansion and contraction of the panels themselves. In addition, such a system would ideally be designed to simplify grounding of the modules. Preferably, the system would also balance stiffness in order to get load sharing between components during wind events, yet also not be too stiff in order to accommodate roof pitch changes and mange thermal strains. To date, such a system has not been realized. As will be shown below, the present design provides such a desired system.
The present invention provides a solar array having successive rows of photovoltaic modules angled in opposing directions. As a result, a first row of photovoltaic modules are tilted (angled) to the east, a second row of photovoltaic modules are tilted (angled) to the west, a third row of photovoltaic modules are tilted (angled) to the east, etc. This tilted (angled) pattern is repeated from east to west across the array, forming alternating “peaks” and “valleys” between the module rows across the array. Lower sides of the photovoltaic modules are preferably supported by pivot mounts on lower mounting bases. Upper sides of the photovoltaic modules are preferably supported by slidable supports moveable on the bars connecting the lower mounting bases to upper mounting bases.
In one preferred embodiment, the present invention provides a photovoltaic mounting system, comprising: (a) an upper mounting base; (b) a lower mounting base; (c) a photovoltaic module support on the lower mounting base, the photovoltaic module support including a connector dimensioned to connect onto a lower side edge of a photovoltaic module; (d) a bar extending from the lower mounting base to the upper mounting base; and (e) a sliding support positionable along the bar, wherein the sliding support includes a connector dimensioned to connect onto an upper side edge of the photovoltaic module.
Preferably, the bars are positioned non-horizontally and the sliding support pivot locks onto the bar (by rotation about an axis perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the bar and parallel to the upper side edge of the module) when the sliding support is secured to an upper side edge of the photovoltaic module. In preferred embodiments, the solar module upper supports are slidable connectors that slide along the bars such that the lower ends of the photovoltaic modules are pivot locked downwardly into the solar module lower supports prior to the solar module upper supports being slid downwardly along the bars and connected onto the upper sides of the photovoltaic modules.
In other preferred embodiments, the present invention provides a photovoltaic array, comprising: (a) a plurality of photovoltaic modules; and (b) mounting hardware supporting the plurality of photovoltaic modules such that the photovoltaic modules are positioned in an array with successive rows of the photovoltaic modules being angled in opposing directions, wherein: (i) upper side edges of adjacent photovoltaic modules are spaced apart a distance of between 18 to 50% of the width of a photovoltaic module; and (ii) lower side edges of adjacent photovoltaic modules are spaced apart a distance of less than 20% of the width of a photovoltaic module.
As such, the gaps formed between successive rows of photovoltaic modules follow a novel pattern. Simply put, the gaps between the “valleys” (i.e.: between the lower side edges of successive module rows) are close together, while the gaps between the “peaks” (i.e.: between the upper side edges of successive module rows) are far apart. As will be explained, this novel spacing between module rows offers many advantages by balancing the considerations of aerodynamics, installer efficiency, rooftop power density, and overall system weight.
For example, advantages of the present design include the fact that the modules can be quickly dropped into position and do not require an aisle or access way running along the lower sides of the module rows for an installer to fasten the modules into an array structure. Instead, the modules are simply pivot-locked by an installer working between the upper side edges of the successive rows. The installer simply lowers the upper sides of the modules (often with one hand) after the lower side of the module has first been placed onto the lower module supports on the lower mounting base. Next, the installer quickly secures each module by sliding the upper connectors down along the non-horizontal bars (connecting the upper and lower mounting bases) to a position against the upper sides of the modules. Stated another way, the installer simply stands in the gap at the “peaks” between the module rows, and does not need to access the gaps in the “valleys” between the module rows.
An important advantage of preferred spacing or “gap” between the “peaks” (i.e.: upper side edges of successive adjacent module rows) is that the upper sides of the modules in the rows are spaced apart a distance large enough to minimize wind lift effects. This is done by providing a passageway for higher pressure air to escape up between the modules. As stated above, another advantage of the preferred gap at the peaks between the upper sides of the modules is that it provides a place for the installer to stand when assembling the array. Yet another advantage of the upper sides of the modules being spaced apart is that it is possible to remove any panel from the array without disturbing the other assembled panels in the array. Conversely, another advantage of the present system is that the bottom sides of the photovoltaic modules can actually be positioned quite close to one another (since the installer need not stand at this location). This can be done by securing pairs of lower bases together, which both provides stability to the array, grounding from one module row to another and also increases the total area of the array that is covered by the photovoltaic modules.
In other preferred aspects, the present invention provides a photovoltaic mounting system, comprising: (a) an upper mounting base; (b) a lower mounting base; (c) a bar extending between the upper mounting base and the lower mounting base; and (d) a snap-fit connector on each of the opposite ends of the bar, the snap-fit connectors securing the opposite ends of the bar to the upper and lower mounting bases. These snap-fit connectors both ground the upper and lower mounting bases to one another while permitting the array to flex considerably if the bars are rotated about their longitudinal axes (for example, during wind events, thermal expansion or contraction, or simply during the assembly of the array itself over an uneven roof surface).
Another advantage of the present system is that it is well adapted to deal with the effects of thermal expansion and contraction of the modules. This is due to the fact that the modules do not touch each other at their sides. Thus, they can expand and contract in two perpendicular directions without contacting one another. Moreover, both the upper and lower mounting bases have supports thereon that permit side-to-side sliding motion of the modules mounted thereon. Additionally, perpendicular lengthwise motion (i.e.: between the peaks and valleys of the array) can be accommodated through flexing of the upper supports on the non-horizontal bars and the lower supports on the lower mounting bases.
Additional advantages of the present system include the fact that it is very quick and easy to install using a very minimal amount of non-standard hardware. As stated above, in preferred embodiments, various components can be quickly snap fit directly into one another. The present system is also lightweight, and can be shipped in small volume containers. Nevertheless, it provides a solid structural base for an array of photovoltaic modules to be built.
One more advantage of the present system is that its non-horizontal bars that span between the upper and lower mounting bases provide moment resistance during the pivot locking installation process. Also, the pivot locking mechanisms and connectors are attached directly to each module frame so that each individual module is electrically grounded right at the time of its attachment into the array.
As seen best in
Referring to
The advantage of bars 40 are that they counter the moment when photovoltaic modules 15 are pivoted down into their final pivot-locked installed position. Specifically, having bars 40 prevents excess torque from being applied to lower mounting bases 20 (and especially their attached lower module supports 22) when the lower sides 13 of photovoltaic modules 15 are each pivot locked onto their bottom support 22.
Next, as seen in
Having two lower mounting bases 20 share a single upper mounting base 30 and having the lower mounting bases 20 fastened together in pairs (as illustrated) also makes it easy to lay out the present system 10 on the roof Specifically, after the first lower mounting base 20 and upper mounting base 30 are positioned on the roof, then the rest of the array falls quickly into position during installation. All that is required when starting such an installation is that parallel rows of bases 20 and 30 are correctly spaced apart.
The inventors have determined that the preferred dimensions of peak gap 19 offer unexpected and beneficial aerodynamic performance advantages to the present system. Specifically, having the upper sides 17 of modules 15A and 15C spaced apart by this preferred gap distance 19 improves aerodynamics by reducing lift on the system as wind passes thereover. This is due to the fact that peak gap 19 permits higher pressure air (which is underneath the array) to escape upwardly through gaps 19 as wind passes over the surface of the array. Upward movement of air is shown by arrows labelled “Air”. Reducing wind lift has the added benefit of reducing ballasting requirements. Thus, by reducing lift, the present spacing reduces the amount of ballast material that can be needed on top of the roof. In addition, the present inventors have experimentally determined that using the present system, it is possible to build an array with a weight of less than 3 psf (of which approximately 2.4 psf are attributed to the modules themselves). Thus, the present design provides a lightweight solution. Moreover, by reducing lift, the present system also reduces the need to anchoring penetrations being made into the roof. Simply put, the present inventors have experimentally determined that the size of peak gap 19 provides an excellent balance of aerodynamic efficiency and access for installers, roofers, etc. on one hand, but without making the gap so large that excessive working surface area of the array is lost (so that energy production would be unnecessarily decreased).
Another benefit of a large peak gap 19 (i.e.: the distance between upper sides 17 of the adjacent modules 15A and 15C) is that an installer can actually stand within peak gap 19 when installing the modules. This gives the installer a convenient place to stand while lowering (i.e.: downwardly pivoting) the modules into their final positions (as illustrated in sequential
Preferably, the gap distance at the valleys V (i.e.: between adjacent lower sides 13 of adjacent module rows) is less than 20% of the width of a photovoltaic module. As such, with standard modules, gap distance of less than 150 mm. The advantage of minimizing this gap distance is that it increases the density of the photovoltaic modules on the roof. Simply put, having the photovoltaic modules positioned close together at their lower ends 13 increases the amount of the roof surface that is covered by the photovoltaic modules, thereby increasing power generation.
As further illustrated in
Also provided is a spring connector 26 which can be slid and rotated to lock such that its end 27 can be inserted into tube 28 on another lower mounting base 20. As such, two bases 20 can be placed together facing in opposite directions with the spring connector 26 on each one of them being moved to fasten into the tube 28 on the other base. This connection is seen in the top plan view of
In alternate embodiments, lower module supports 22 can instead comprise wraparound supports having top parts received over the top edge of the photovoltaic module and bottom parts received under the bottom edge of the photovoltaic module). In such embodiments, suitable connectors and fasteners can be used to attach the lower sides 13 of photovoltaic modules 15 to each wraparound support 22, all keeping within the scope of the present invention. In these embodiments, wraparound supports 22 may or may not be pivot-locking connectors. For example, drop in slots of the bottom edges of the modules would also work. In fact, any connection system where the installer could connect the lower side 13 of module 15 to connectors 22 while standing at the peak P would be sufficient, all keeping within the scope of the present invention.
As further illustrated in
Preferably, sliding support 31 has an aperture 37 passing therethrough. Bar 40 is received within aperture 37. Aperture 37 has a central longitudinal axis C that is not collinear with the central longitudinal axis B of bar 40. As seen in
A further aspect of the present system is that snap-fit connectors can be provided to attach opposite ends of bar 40 to each of lower mounting bases 20 and upper mounting bases 30. As seen in
As can be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art, the present “lower pivot locking and upper sliding locking” system has many advantages. For example, it can be installed quickly and easily with the installer simply standing in peak gap 19 and pivot-lowering the modules into position. As was stated, the installer simply first positions lower sides 13 of the modules onto lower module supports 22. Next, the installer lowers upper sides 17 of each module down into position. Next, the installer secures upper side 17 into place with rotatable locks on engaging portion 33. Advantageously as well, gripping portion 35 preferably needs only be turned 90 degrees to lock engaging portion 33 into position within the groove on upper side 17. As was shown, sliding supports 31 are designed to not slide along bar 40 after engaging portion 33 has been locked into the groove on side 17 of the module frame, thereby constraining motion of the upper module support 32 along bar 40, further securing the assembly together.
Another advantage of snap-connectors 41 and 43 is that they maintain grounding between the upper and lower mounting bases 30 and 20. In preferred embodiments, such grounding is maintained even when bars 40 are rotated slightly about their longitudinal axis B (
A further important advantage of the present invention is its ability to cope with thermal expansion and contraction of the photovoltaic modules 15. For example, modules 15 do not touch one another at their sides (as seen in
Thermal expansion and contraction in the Y-direction can be accommodated by upper module support 32 sliding small distances up and down along bars 40. In addition, the relatively loose nature of pin-in-hole connectors 41 and 43 also permits slight movement in the Y-direction (and long the central longitudinal axis A of the bars 40). Lastly, slight twisting rotation about the center axis B of each of bars 40 can also be accommodated by the relatively loose nature of pin-in-hole connectors 41 and 43, as was explained above. Therefore, in addition to compensating well for thermal expansion, the present systems' looseness of parts permits ease of placement on an un-level roof.
Additionally, optional bottom stiffener 24 also advantageously resists wind loading since modules 15 are free to slide side-to-side during thermal expansion and contraction, but transfers loads between modules 15A and 15B when one of the modules is lifted by the wind.
Furthermore, pairs of lower mounting bases 20 can rotate around springs 26 (which connect them together). This feature permits flexing of the array, and also permits pairs of bases 20 to be positioned on uneven ground. Finally, further flexing of the array can be accommodated by the upwardly extending portions of the two sides of upper mounting base 30 flexing either closer together or farther apart. Such flexing can help to accommodate thermal expansion and contraction of the modules in the array.
Lastly,
It is to be understood that the present invention is not to be limited in scope by the specific embodiments described herein. Indeed, various modifications of the embodiments of the present inventions, in addition to those described herein, will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from the foregoing description and accompanying drawings and claims. Accordingly, this disclosure should be construed in view of the full breath and spirit of the embodiments of the present inventions as disclosed herein and claimed below.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/040,664, of same title, filed Aug. 22, 2014.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4371139 | Clark | Feb 1983 | A |
5316592 | Dinwoodie | May 1994 | A |
5505788 | Dinwoodie | Apr 1996 | A |
5746839 | Dinwoodie | May 1998 | A |
6360491 | Ullman | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6672018 | Shingleton | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6809251 | Dinwoodie | Oct 2004 | B2 |
D633033 | Conger | Feb 2011 | S |
D648269 | Conger | Nov 2011 | S |
8156697 | Miros | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8276330 | Harberts | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8336277 | Rego et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8505248 | Leong et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8522491 | Kneip | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8558101 | Mascolo | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8640423 | Meppelink | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8683761 | Danning | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8752338 | Schaefer | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8829330 | Meyer | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8875455 | Yang | Nov 2014 | B1 |
D738820 | Beck | Sep 2015 | S |
9194612 | Bragagna | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9263985 | Silberschatz | Feb 2016 | B2 |
20030070368 | Shingleton | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030101662 | Ullman | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030177706 | Ullman | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040007260 | Dinwoodie | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040250491 | Diaz | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070144575 | Mascolo et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070151594 | Mascolo et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080029144 | Brazier et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090134291 | Meier | May 2009 | A1 |
20090242014 | Leary | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100089390 | Miros | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100179678 | Dinwoodie et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100193012 | Klammer et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100243023 | Patton | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110000526 | West | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20120048351 | Rizzo | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120132260 | Hirsch | May 2012 | A1 |
20120152326 | West et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120174913 | Salzer | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120223033 | Molek | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120234378 | West | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120273029 | Bragagna et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120298817 | West | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120301661 | West | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130011187 | Schuit et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20140026946 | West | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140130847 | West | May 2014 | A1 |
20140130849 | Silberschatz | May 2014 | A1 |
20140158184 | West | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140174510 | Kanbara | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140182663 | Kuo | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140261642 | Beck | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150179848 | Korman | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100 47 400 | Apr 2002 | DE |
10 2005 007184 | Jun 2006 | DE |
20 2010 015817 | Feb 2011 | DE |
102010042819 | Dec 2011 | DE |
102011055819 | May 2013 | DE |
202013002162 | Jun 2013 | DE |
102012105072 | Nov 2013 | DE |
10 2012 221894 | Jun 2014 | DE |
2 378 565 | Oct 2011 | EP |
2012116121 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 2013125391 | Aug 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PanelClaw “Grizzly Bear Flat Roof Mounting System”, http://www.panelclaw.com/grizzly-bear.html, pp. 1-2, retrieved May 6, 2014. |
PanelClaw “Kodiak Bear Flat Roof Mounting System”, http://www.panelclaw.com/component/k2/item/41.html?Itemid=186, pp. 1-2, retrieved May 6, 2014. |
Civicsolar “PanelClaw Polar Bear East/West Roof Mount System”, http://www.civicsolar.com/product/panelclaw-polar-bear-eastwest-roof-mount-system, pp. 1-2, retrieved Oct. 22, 2014. |
Mounting Systems “Flat roof solar mounting system Lambda Light EW+”, http://ww3.mounting-systems.info/en/flat—roof—mounting—system—lambda—light—EW.html, p. 1, retrieved Oct. 22, 2014. |
Altec “Optimised flat roof ballast system”, http://altec-solar.co.uk/products/mountingsystems/flatroofsystems/optimisedballast/, p. 1, retrieved Oct. 22, 2014. |
Tritec “New, Extremely Efficient Mounting System: Tri-Flat”, http://www.tritec-energy.com/en/tritec/news-info-13.09.2013-01/, pp. 1-4, retrieved Oct. 22, 2014. |
Morganssolar “4.0kWp East/West”, http://morganssolar.com/case-studies-2/4-0kwp-east-west-array/, pp. 1-3, retrieved Oct. 22, 2014. |
Renusol Solar Mounting Systems “Best for East/West”, http://www.bestforeastwest.de/, pp. 1-2, retrieved Oct. 22, 2014. |
Spider-Rax “Tarantula Ballasted Flat Roof Mounting”, http://spiderrax.com/Tarantula—final.pdf, pp. 1-2, retrieved Oct. 22, 2014. |
International Search Report mailed on Nov. 6, 2015 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/046411, 5 pages. |
Written Opinion mailed on Nov. 6, 2015 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/046411, 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160056752 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62040664 | Aug 2014 | US |