The present application relates generally to gripping mechanisms for downhole tools.
WWT International has developed many tools for anchoring down hole tools to the internal surface defining the bore hole. The various designs incorporate different features to allow the tool to operate in different internal diameter (“ID”) ranges as well as specialize in different operations. The designs also incorporate features that are compatible with various collapsed tool outer diameter (“OD”) constraints. For purposes of this application, a “throughfit OD” is defined as the smallest diameter circle through which the tool can be inserted.
WWT's grippers have included inflatable packer type grippers, roller/ramp expansion mechanisms in both fixed and “expandable” ramp configurations, linkages, and any combination of the these technologies. However, previous grippers have had issues operating in common cased and open hole diameters when constrained with very small collapsed tool OD's (i.e. 2.125″). Also, as the collapsed tool diameter shrinks, the gripper's ability to perform reliably in the varied bore hole conditions can suffer due to the smaller packaging of the critical load bearing elements. In addition, very small grippers generally have extremely limited strength and thus typically limit the load capacity of the tractor. Also, many small grippers have a large number of small parts that are subject to contamination from well bore debris.
In one known design, a tractor comprises an elongated body, a propulsion system for applying thrust to the body, and grippers for anchoring the tractor to the inner surface defining a borehole or passage while such thrust is applied to the body. Each gripper has an actuated position in which the gripper substantially prevents relative movement between the gripper and the inner surface defining the passage using outward radial force, and a second, typically retracted, position in which the gripper permits substantially free relative movement between the gripper and the inner surface of the passage. Typically, each gripper is slidably engaged with the tractor body so that the body can be thrust longitudinally while the gripper is actuated.
One aspect of at least one embodiment of the invention is the recognition that it would be desirable to have a gripper configured to operate in relatively large bore holes when compared to the collapsed OD of the gripper. Even with the compromised design space of small OD, the Eccentric Linkage Gripper (“ELG”) preferably maintains sufficient mechanical properties to ensure reliable operation. It is designed to work in conjunction with known bore hole conditions and minimize their detrimental effect on the gripper.
In some embodiments, an ELG gripper as described below has several advantages. These advantages include the ability to pass through small downhole restrictions and then significantly expand to operate is large cased wells or even larger open holes.
In one aspect, a method of moving a tool along a passage includes positioning a gripper in the passage, the gripper comprising a body defining an axis and a grip assembly coupled to the body, the grip assembly comprising a wall engagement portion, wherein said gripper is positioned eccentrically within said passage such that said axis of said body of said gripper is not placed centrally in the passage and exerting force on one side of the passage with the wall engagement portion of the grip assembly to propel said gripper within the passage. In some aspects, exerting force on one side of the passage with the wall engagement portion further comprises using links to exert force on one side of the passage. In some aspects, the wellbore defines a passage having a longitudinal passage axis and a longitudinal axis of the body is spaced from the longitudinal passage axis by an eccentric distance when the grip assembly is in an expanded configuration. In some aspects, a ratio of a radius of the passage to the eccentric distance is at least 3.
In one aspect, a gripper includes a body comprising a sliding portion and a grip assembly coupled to the body. The grip assembly comprises a wall engagement portion configured to grip an interior surface defining a wellbore. The wall engagement portion is extendable away from the sliding portion. The sliding portion is configured to slide along the interior surface defining the wellbore. In some aspects, the gripper further includes a plurality of extendable members. In some aspects, the gripper further includes a linkage. In some aspects, the wall engagement portion is defined by the linkage. In some aspects, the gripper further includes an actuator for causing the wall engagement portion to exert outward force. In some aspects, the actuator is within the body. In some aspects, the gripper is configured to slide along a bottom surface of a horizontal wellbore and grip a top surface of a horizontal wellbore. In some aspects, the sliding portion comprises at least one wheel.
In some aspects, a coefficient of friction between the sliding portion and the surface of the wellbore is less than 0.3. In some aspects, a coefficient of friction between the sliding portion and the surface of the wellbore is less than 0.5, less than 0.4, less than 0.3, and less than 0.2.
In some aspects, a ratio of an expanded throughfit OD of the gripper to a collapsed throughfit OD of the gripper is more than 2, more than 2.5, more than 2.75, more than 3, or more than 3.25. In some aspects, a maximum working operation expansion angle could be less than 85 degrees, less than 80 degrees, less than 75 degrees, less than 70 degrees, less than 60 degrees, or less than 50 degrees.
In another aspect, a method for moving a tool along a passage includes the steps of positioning a gripper in the passage, the gripper comprising a body comprising a sliding portion and a grip assembly coupled to the body, the grip assembly comprising a wall engagement portion; exerting force on one side of the passage with the wall engagement portion of the grip assembly; and sliding the body along another side of the passage due to a resultant force from the exerting force.
In yet another aspect, a gripper assembly includes a link mechanism including a lower link connector connected to a first push link and a second push link, the lower link connector slidably attached to an elongate body, a load link rotatably attached to the elongate body, an upper link connector rotatably connected to the first and second push links and the load link, and an expansion surface upon which the first and second push links act to provide an expansion force. For a first expansion range, the movement of the first and second push links upon the expansion surface expands the linkage and for a second expansion range the movement of the first and second push links pushing against a first end of the upper link connector expands the linkage. In some aspects, the first push link, the second push link, the upper link connector, and the lower link connector form an approximately parallelogram shape when the link mechanism is expanded. In some aspects, the ratio of a length of the first push link to a length of the second push link is approximately 1. In some aspects, a maximum angle of the load link with respect to the elongate body does not exceed 80 degrees.
In another aspect, a gripper includes a body comprising a first side that defines a translating contact surface and a second side that defines a wall engagement portion. The wall engagement portion is configured to grip an interior surface defining a wellbore and propel the gripper by engaging with the interior surface defining a wellbore, said wall engagement portion extendable away from the second side and said contact surface is configured to translate along the interior surface defining the wellbore. In some aspects, the first side is passive. In some aspects, the first side defines a line of movement along which the contact surface of the gripper translates along the interior surface defining the wellbore. In some aspects, the first side defines three points of contact between the gripper and the interior surface defining the wellbore. In some aspects, the first surface further comprises at least one wheel. In some aspects, the gripper further includes a plurality of extendable members. In some aspects, the gripper further includes a linkage. In some aspects, the wall engagement portion is defined by the linkage.
Overview—Eccentric Linkage Gripper
The Eccentric Linkage Gripper (“ELG”) operates by utilizing a linkage assembly on one side of an elongate body and a sliding portion on an opposite side of the elongate body. The ELG gripper uses the moment of the force applied to an interior surface defining a bore hole to move the gripper along an opposite interior surface defining the bore hole. In some embodiments, including the illustrated embodiments, the eccentric linkage assembly acts on an inside surface of a well bore. The force exerted on the well bore causes the sliding portion of the ELG to slide along an opposite interior surface of the well bore to move the ELG in the predetermined direction of travel. The ELG has also been designed to preferably provide enough mechanical advantage to enable the gripper to function on very low input forces from a linear force actuator. The gripper is desirably eccentrically positioned in the bottom (low side) of the bore hole which enables the gripper to operate in wider ranges diameters as well as minimizing the effects of varying friction factors of different regions of the bore hole diameter. In the ELG, the actual linkage assembly preferably transmits the radial forces to the bore hole wall in the most favorable orientation.
Eccentric Linkage Gripper Assembly
The ELG can be a stand-alone subassembly that can be preferably configured to be adaptable to substantially all applicable tractor designs. In some embodiments, a spring return, single acting hydraulic cylinder actuator 220 can provide an axial force to a linkage 12 to translate into radial force. As with certain previous grippers, the ELG gripper may allow axial translation of a tractor shaft while the gripping section 14 engages the hole or casing wall.
With continued reference to
In the illustrated embodiments shown most clearly in
With continued reference to
With continued reference to
In some embodiments, including the illustrated embodiment shown in
The ELG gripper 10, as shown in
With reference to
Additionally, the entire specification of U.S. Pat. No. 7,748,476, entitled “VARIABLE LINKAGE GRIPPER,” including the drawings and claims, is incorporated hereby by reference in its entirety and made a part of this specification.
With respect to
In other embodiments, the actuator 220 can comprise other types of actuators such as dual acting piston/cylinder assemblies or an electric motor. The actuator 220 can create a force (either from pressure in hydraulic fluid or electrically-induced rotation) and convey it to the expandable gripping section 14. In other embodiments, the expandable gripping section 14 can be configured differently such that the gripping section 14 can have a different expansion profile.
In the illustrated embodiment, when the ELG gripper 10 is expanded, as shown in
Operation Description of the Eccentric Linkage Gripper
With reference to
An expansion sequence of the ELG gripper 10 from a fully collapsed or retracted position to a fully expanded position is illustrated sequentially in
In the illustrated embodiments, the initial phase of expansion described above with respect to
At the beginning of the working operational expansion range, as shown in
The ELG gripper 10 is preferably designed to operate over a range of expansion angles A between 50 and 75 degrees. The variation in the length of the links is very large so the ratios of the expanded OD to collapsed OD are large. The current design has demonstrated expansion from approximately 2⅛ inches to approximately 10 inches with a range of expansion angles A from 50-75 degrees. For expansion angles A below approximately 45 degrees, the gripper 10 does not have sufficient grip to pull 2000 lbs. For expansion angles A greater than approximately 80 degrees, excessive loads may be placed on the links, potentially causing the links to fail.
The configuration of the linkage 12 and the relative lengths of the links 60, 62, and 80, and the position and height of the ramp 90 can determine the expansion ranges for which the primary mode of expansion force transfer is through the ramp 90 to the push links 60 and 62 interface and the expansion range for which the primary expansion force is generated by the buckling of the push links 60 and 62 and the load link 80 by the piston rod 224 of the actuator 220.
In some embodiments, where the ELG gripper 10 can be used for wellbore intervention in boreholes having relatively small entry points and potentially large washout sections, it can be desirable that a collapsed outer diameter of the ELG gripper 10 is approximately 3 inches and an expanded outer diameter is approximately 15 inches, thus providing a total diametric expansion, defined as a difference between the expanded outer diameter and the collapsed outer diameter, of approximately 12 inches. In some embodiments, including the illustrated embodiment, the total diametric expansion of the gripper assembly 10 can be at least 10 inches, at least 12 inches, or at least 15 inches. Desirably, in some embodiments, including the illustrated embodiment, an expansion range (that is, the distance between the outer diameter of the gripper 10 in a collapsed state and the outer diameter of the gripper 10 in an expanded state) can be between 2 inches and 5 inches, between 2 inches and 6 inches, between 3 inches and 5 inches, between 3 inches and 6 inches, between 3 inches and 7 inches, between 3 inches and 8 inches, between 3 inches and 10 inches, between 3 inches and 12 inches, between 3 inches and 15 inches or between 3 inches and 18 inches. In some embodiments, including the illustrated embodiment, the ELG gripper 10 can have an outer diameter in a collapsed position of less than 5 inches, less than 4 inches, or less than 3 inches. In some embodiments, including the illustrated embodiment, the ELG gripper 10 can have an outer diameter in an expanded position of at least 10 inches, at least 12 inches, at least 15 inches, or at least 17 inches. In certain embodiments, it can be desirable that an expansion ratio of the ELG gripper 10, defined as the ratio of the outer diameter of the ELG gripper 10 in an expanded position to the outer diameter of the ELG gripper 10 in a collapsed position, is at least 6, at least 5, at least 4.2, at least 4, at least 3.4, at least 3, at least 2.2, at least 2, at least 1.8 or at least 1.6. Desirably, in some embodiments, including the illustrated embodiment, the ELG gripper 10 has an expansion ratio of at least one of the foregoing ranges and a collapsed position to allow the gripper 10 to fit through a wellbore opening having a diameter no greater than 7 inches, a diameter no greater than 6 inches, a diameter no greater than 5 inches, or a diameter no greater than 4 inches. Desirably, in some embodiments, including the illustrated embodiment, the ELG gripper 10 has an expansion ratio of at least 3.5 and a collapsed position to allow the gripper 10 to fit through a wellbore opening having a diameter no greater than 7 inches, a diameter no greater than 6 inches, a diameter no greater than 5 inches, or a diameter no greater than 4 inches.
It can be desirable that in certain embodiments, the ramp has a height at the expanded end thereof relative to the ELG gripper 10 body from between approximately 0.3 inches to approximately 1 inch, and more desirably from 0.4 inches to 0.6 inches, such that for a diameter of the ELG gripper 10 from approximately 3.7 inches to up to approximately 5.7 inches, and desirably, in some embodiments, up to approximately 4.7 inches, the primary mode of expansion force transfer is through the rollers 104 to ramp 90 interface. At expanded diameters greater than approximately 5.7 inches, or, in some embodiments desirably approximately 4.7 inches, the primary mode of expansion force transfer is by continued buckling of the linkage 12 from axial force applied to the lower link connector 50 and the first ends of the push links 60 and 62.
With reference to
To convey a tractor, or any down hole tool, forward within a formation, the gripper is preferably pushed down hole while inflated or expanded or partially expanded. When the tractor pulls against the ELG gripper 10, the tractor force activates the linkage 12 and preferably ensures that the gripper 10 will remain engaged if the bore hole diameter falls within the operational range of the ELG gripper 10.
During activation of the singular linkage assembly, the ELG gripper 10 will preferably eccentrically position itself at the low side of the bore hole. This positioning provides several advantages.
First, WWT International grippers are used primarily in down hole tractors. Down hole tractors are frequently utilized in horizontal well bores. In horizontal well bores, both cased and open hole, accumulations of well bore debris fall to the low side of the well bore and tend to reduce “traction” for gripping mechanisms. This is due to the reduction in shear strength of the accumulated debris on the low side in comparison with the exposed section of open or cased hole on the top section (high side). The resultant differences in friction factors of the top and bottom sections of the well bore load concentric grippers in a non-symmetrical fashion. This non-symmetrical loading often requires elements of the gripper or expansion elements to be over-engineered (larger cross sections and overall mechanical properties). This is often not an option when designing very small collapsed OD tools. The ELG gripper illustrated in
As the linkage 12 activates and engages the well bore formation or casing, an input force F is applied. As a result of this input force F, the sliding portion 86 of the gripper 10 slides along the lower surface of the formation in the direction M. After sliding along the formation in response to the input force F, the linkage 12 may be reset by partially collapsing and then expanding to exert force against the formation, resulting in another sliding translation of the gripper 10 along the opposite surface of the formation. This process may continue to incrementally move the gripper 10 and any connected well bore tools along the formation. This results in a gripper 10 with a fast cycling time due to not requiring a full collapse of the linkage 12 during operation.
In some embodiments, including the illustrated embodiment, the sliding portion 86 of the ELG gripper 10 may be constructed of different external materials from the elongate body 25. In some embodiments, including the illustrated embodiment, coatings such as a polymer, may be applied to the sliding portion 86 to control sliding and reduce friction. Depending on well conditions, the sliding portion 86 may be comprised of low friction materials to reduce friction in wells with excessive debris and associated high sliding friction. For wells with very low friction, such as cased wells with reduced friction due to the well fluid, coatings may be applied to the sliding portion 86 to increase friction on the sliding portion and facilitate controlled sliding of the gripper 10.
Additionally, the ELG gripper 10 having a sliding portion 86 is designed to work with known down hole conditions including debris accumulation on the low side of the formation. The sliding portion 86 desirably allows the ELG gripper 10 to slide over and through this debris with very little friction. In some embodiments, a coefficient of friction between the sliding portion 86 and the surface of the wellbore 98, as shown in
In some embodiments, it is preferable to eccentrically position the gripper in the low side of the well bore such that only one linkage 12 needs to fit within the collapsed tool OD. When only one linkage 12 is present, the linkage 12 can generally be oversized and operate with larger safety factors to survive the rigors of down hole use. The structural rigidity of the ELG gripper 10 is preferably maintained due to the low number of moving parts and their relatively large size. The eccentric positioned gripper 10 within the well bore and the singular linkage 12 preferably removes the non-symmetrical loading of pinned multi-gripper centralized grippers. All expansion forces are preferably symmetric within the single linkage assembly.
In some embodiments, including the illustrated embodiment shown in
As discussed above, in one general aspect, the geometry of the gripper 10 is such that body 25 is positioned eccentrically within the wellbore. In some embodiments, including the illustrated embodiment shown in
One advantage of the geometry of the gripper 10 as illustrated in
In some aspects, a ratio of the expanded throughfit OD of the gripper in an expanded configuration to an collapsed throughfit OD of the gripper is more than 2, more than 2.5, more than 2.75, more than 3, or more than 3.25.
Although these inventions have been disclosed in the context of a certain preferred embodiment and examples, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present inventions extend beyond the specifically disclosed embodiments and embodiments disclosed to other alternative embodiments and/or uses of the invention and obvious modifications and equivalents thereof. Additionally, it is contemplated that various aspects and features of the inventions described can be practiced separately, combined together, or substituted for one another, and that a variety of combination and subcombinations of the features and aspects can be made and still fall within the scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the scope of the present invention herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above, but should be determined only by a fair reading of the claims.
Any and all applications for which a foreign or domestic priority claim is identified in the Application Data Sheet as filed with the present application are hereby incorporated by reference under 37 CFR 1.57. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/932,192, entitled “ECCENTRIC LINKAGE GRIPPER,” filed on Jan. 27, 2014, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/933,755, entitled “ECCENTRIC LINKAGE GRIPPER,” filed on Jan. 30, 2014, U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/954,372, entitled “ECCENTRIC LINKAGE GRIPPER,” filed on Mar. 17, 2014, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/222,310, entitled “ECCENTRIC LINKAGE GRIPPER,” filed on Mar. 21, 2014, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/291,925, entitled “ECCENTRIC LINKING GRIPPER,” filed on Oct. 12, 2016, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2141030 | Clark | Dec 1938 | A |
2167194 | Anderson | Jul 1939 | A |
2271005 | Grebe | Jan 1942 | A |
2569457 | Dale et al. | Oct 1951 | A |
2727722 | Conboy | Dec 1955 | A |
2783028 | Jamison | Feb 1957 | A |
2946565 | Williams | Jul 1960 | A |
2946578 | De Smaele | Jul 1960 | A |
3138214 | Bridwell | Jun 1964 | A |
3180436 | Kellner et al. | Apr 1965 | A |
3180437 | Kellner et al. | Apr 1965 | A |
3185225 | Ginies | May 1965 | A |
3224513 | Weeden, Jr. | Dec 1965 | A |
3224734 | Hill | Dec 1965 | A |
3225843 | Ortloff et al. | Dec 1965 | A |
3376942 | Van Winkle | Apr 1968 | A |
3497019 | Ortloff | Feb 1970 | A |
3599712 | Magill | Aug 1971 | A |
3606924 | Malone | Sep 1971 | A |
3661205 | Belorgey | May 1972 | A |
3664416 | Nicolas et al. | May 1972 | A |
3797589 | Kellner et al. | Mar 1974 | A |
3827512 | Edmond | Aug 1974 | A |
RE28449 | Edmond | Jun 1975 | E |
3941190 | Conover | Mar 1976 | A |
3978930 | Schroeder | Sep 1976 | A |
3992565 | Gatheld | Nov 1976 | A |
4040494 | Kellner | Aug 1977 | A |
4085808 | Kling | Apr 1978 | A |
4095655 | Still | Jun 1978 | A |
4141414 | Johansson | Feb 1979 | A |
4184546 | Nicolas et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4274758 | Schosek | Jun 1981 | A |
4314615 | Sodder, Jr. et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4365676 | Boyadjieff et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4372161 | de Buda et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4385021 | Neeley | May 1983 | A |
4440239 | Evans | Apr 1984 | A |
4463814 | Horstmeyer et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4558751 | Huffaker | Dec 1985 | A |
4573537 | Hirasuna et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4588951 | Ohmer | May 1986 | A |
4600974 | Lew et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4615401 | Garrett | Oct 1986 | A |
4674914 | Wayman et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4686653 | Staron et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4811785 | Weber | Mar 1989 | A |
4821817 | Cendre et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4854397 | Warren et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4926937 | Hademenos | May 1990 | A |
4951760 | Cendre et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5010965 | Schmelzer | Apr 1991 | A |
5052211 | Cohrs et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5090259 | Shishido et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5169264 | Kimura | Dec 1992 | A |
5184676 | Graham et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5186264 | du Chaffaut | Feb 1993 | A |
5203646 | Landsberger et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5310012 | Cendre et al. | May 1994 | A |
5316094 | Pringle et al. | May 1994 | A |
5358039 | Fordham | Oct 1994 | A |
5358040 | Kinley et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5363929 | Williams et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5394951 | Pringle et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5419405 | Patton | May 1995 | A |
5425429 | Thompson | Jun 1995 | A |
5449047 | Schivley, Jr. | Sep 1995 | A |
5467832 | Orban et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5494111 | Davis | Feb 1996 | A |
5519668 | Montaron | May 1996 | A |
5542253 | Ganzel | Aug 1996 | A |
5613568 | Sterner et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5622231 | Thompson | Apr 1997 | A |
5752572 | Baiden et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758731 | Zollinger | Jun 1998 | A |
5758732 | Liw | Jun 1998 | A |
5765640 | Milne et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5794703 | Newman et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5803193 | Krueger et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5845796 | Miller | Dec 1998 | A |
5857731 | Heim et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5947213 | Angle et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954131 | Salwasser | Sep 1999 | A |
5960895 | Chevallier et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5979550 | Tessier | Nov 1999 | A |
5996979 | Hrsuch | Dec 1999 | A |
6003606 | Moore et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6026911 | Angle et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031371 | Smart | Feb 2000 | A |
6082461 | Newman | Jul 2000 | A |
6089323 | Newman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6112809 | Angle | Sep 2000 | A |
6216779 | Reinhardt | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230813 | Moore et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232773 | Jacobs et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241031 | Beaufort et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6273189 | Gissler et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286592 | Moore et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6315043 | Farrant et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6345669 | Buyers et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6347674 | Bloom et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6378627 | Tubel et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6427786 | Beaufort et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6431270 | Angle | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6431291 | Moore et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6464003 | Bloom et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6478097 | Bloom et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6601652 | Moore et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6609579 | Krueger et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6629568 | Post et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6640894 | Bloom et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651747 | Chen et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6679341 | Bloom et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6702010 | Yuratich et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6712134 | Stoesz | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6715559 | Bloom et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6722442 | Simpson | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6745854 | Bloom et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758279 | Moore et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6796380 | Xu | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6827149 | Hache | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6868906 | Vail, III et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6910533 | Guerrero | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6920936 | Sheiretov et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6935423 | Kusmer | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6938708 | Bloom et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6953086 | Simpson | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7048047 | Bloom et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7059417 | Moore et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7080700 | Bloom et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7080701 | Bloom et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7090007 | Stuart-Bruges et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7121364 | Mock et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7143843 | Doering et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7156181 | Moore et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7156192 | Guerrero et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7172026 | Misselbrook | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7174974 | Bloom et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7185716 | Bloom et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7188681 | Bloom et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7191829 | Bloom et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7215253 | Baek et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7222682 | Doering | May 2007 | B2 |
7252143 | Sellers et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7273109 | Moore et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7275593 | Bloom et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7303010 | de Guzman et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7334642 | Doering et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7337850 | Contant | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7343982 | Mock et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7353886 | Bloom et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7392859 | Mock et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7401665 | Guerrero et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7493967 | Mock et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7516782 | Sheiretov et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7516792 | Lonnes et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7604060 | Bloom et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7607495 | Bloom et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7607497 | Mock et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7624808 | Mock | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7743849 | Kotsonis et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7748476 | Krueger, V | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7770667 | Moore | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7775272 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7784564 | Iskander et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7832488 | Guerrero et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7836950 | Vail, III et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7854258 | Sheiretov et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7857067 | Tunc et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7886834 | Spencer et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7896088 | Guerrero et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7900699 | Ramos et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7954562 | Mock | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7954563 | Mock et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8028766 | Moore | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8061447 | Krueger | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069917 | Bloom et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8082988 | Redlinger et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8151902 | Lynde et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8245796 | Mock et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8286716 | Martinez et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8485253 | Jacob | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8485278 | Mock | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8555963 | Bloom et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579037 | Jacob | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8602115 | Aguirre et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8944161 | Bloom et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9228403 | Bloom et al. | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9447648 | Mitchell | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9488020 | Krueger, V | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9988868 | Bloom et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10156963 | Krueger | Dec 2018 | B2 |
20010045300 | Fincher et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020077971 | Beaufort et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020029908 | Bloom et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20050145415 | Doering et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060180318 | Doering et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070095532 | Head et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070261887 | Pai et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080061647 | Schmitt | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080066963 | Sheiretov et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080073077 | Tunc et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080110635 | Loretz et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080196901 | Aguirre et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080202769 | Dupree et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080314639 | Kotsonis et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090008150 | Lavrut et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090071660 | Martinez et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090091278 | Montois et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090159295 | Guerrero et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090218105 | Hill et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090229820 | Saeed | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090236101 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090294124 | Patel | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090321141 | Kotsonis et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100018695 | Bloom et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100038138 | Mock et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100108387 | Bloom et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100108394 | Ollerenshaw et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100314131 | Krueger, V | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120061075 | Mock | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2002-230623 | Jul 2007 | AU |
2004-4210989 | Mar 2009 | AU |
2 250 483 | Apr 1999 | CA |
2 336 421 | Jan 2006 | CA |
2 436 944 | May 2012 | CA |
2 515 482 | May 2013 | CA |
2 581 438 | Oct 2015 | CA |
2 688 348 | Oct 2015 | CA |
24 39 063 | Feb 1976 | DE |
29 20 049 | Feb 1981 | DE |
0 149 528 | Jul 1985 | EP |
0 951 611 | Jan 1993 | EP |
0 257 744 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0 767 289 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0 911 483 | Apr 1997 | EP |
1 281 834 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1 344 893 | Sep 2003 | EP |
1 370 891 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1 845 230 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1 223 305 | Apr 2008 | EP |
894 117 | Apr 1962 | GB |
1 105 701 | Mar 1968 | GB |
2 048 339 | Dec 1980 | GB |
2 241 723 | Sep 1991 | GB |
2 305 407 | Apr 1997 | GB |
2 310 871 | Sep 1997 | GB |
2 346 908 | Aug 2000 | GB |
2 362 405 | Nov 2004 | GB |
2 401 130 | Nov 2004 | GB |
2 389 135 | Nov 2005 | GB |
2 413 816 | Jan 2006 | GB |
2 414 499 | Jun 2006 | GB |
317476 | Nov 2004 | NO |
328145 | Dec 2009 | NO |
WO 198905391 | Jun 1989 | WO |
WO 199213226 | Aug 1992 | WO |
WO 199318277 | Sep 1993 | WO |
WO 199427022 | Nov 1994 | WO |
WO 199521987 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 199801651 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO 200036266 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 200046461 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 200063606 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 200073619 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 200244509 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO 2004072433 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2005057076 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO 2007039025 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007134748 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008061100 | May 2008 | WO |
WO 2008104177 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2008104178 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2008104179 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2008128542 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2008128543 | Oct 2008 | WO |
WO 2009062718 | May 2009 | WO |
WO 2010062186 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO 2011005519 | Jan 2011 | WO |
WO 2013063317 | May 2013 | WO |
WO 2015112353 | Jul 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/010889, dated May 27, 2015. |
PCT International Report on Patentability for PCT Application No. PCT/US2015/010889, dated Aug. 2, 2016. |
“Kilobomac to Challenge Tradition” Norwegian Oil Review, 1988, pp. 50-52. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190249505 A1 | Aug 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61954372 | Mar 2014 | US | |
61933755 | Jan 2014 | US | |
61932192 | Jan 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15291925 | Oct 2016 | US |
Child | 16186861 | US | |
Parent | 14222310 | Mar 2014 | US |
Child | 15291925 | US |