This disclosure relates generally to a system and method for compacting materials, such as vibratory roller compactors or utility compactors. More specifically, this disclosure relates to eccentric vibratory weight shafts for utility compactors and methods for retrofitting existing compactors with the disclosed shafts and methods for compacting materials using the disclosed shafts.
Compacting work machines are widely used in the construction and landscaping industries for the compaction of granular materials. Compacting machines come in a variety of forms including vibratory rammers, vibratory plate compactors and vibratory roller (or drum) compactors. This disclosure is directed to vibratory roller compactors, which are also referred to as rollers, articulated rollers, vibratory soil compactors, vibratory asphalt compactors and the term that will be used herein, utility compactors. Applications for such utility compactors include the compaction of sand, gravel, or crushed aggregate for foundations, footings, or driveways; base preparation for concrete slabs, asphalt parking lots, etc. Utility compactors are also used for the compaction of either hot or cold mix asphalt during patching or repairing of streets, highways, sidewalks, parking lots, etc.
The typical utility compactor includes one or two rollers or rollers that perform the actual compacting operation. The rollers are mounted to a main frame that supports an engine and associated equipment. An eccentric shaft, commonly known as an exciter, is located within and rotatably coupled to the roller by a second hydraulic motor. In hot mix asphalt compaction applications, the machine may be provided with a water tank and associated equipment for spraying water on the surface immediately in front of the roller to prevent the asphalt from congealing on the roller.
Utility compactors on the market today exhibit a number of drawbacks and disadvantages. First, the eccentric shaft used to vibrate the roller is very heavy, thereby increasing both manufacturing and operating costs. As shown in
As a result, a need has therefore arisen to provide an improved eccentric shaft for a utility compactor lacking some or all the disadvantages described above.
An eccentric vibratory shaft is disclosed that includes a first rotor shaft coaxially spaced apart from a second rotor shaft. The first and second rotor shafts are coupled together by an offset shaft. The offset shaft includes a first angled portion, a second angled portion and a center portion disposed between and coupling the first and second angled portions. The first angled portion is coupled to the first rotor shaft; the second angled portion is coupled to the second rotor shaft. The first and second angled portions are each angled with respect to a first axis passing through the first and second rotor shafts such that the center portion is offset from and at least substantially parallel to the first axis.
A utility compactor is also disclosed that includes a roller having two opposing vertical supports. The compactor also includes an eccentric vibratory shaft extending between and rotatably connected to the two vertical supports of the roller. The eccentric vibratory shaft includes a first rotor shaft coaxially spaced apart from a second rotor shaft. The first and second rotor shafts are coupled together by an offset shaft. The offset shaft has an I-beam cross section and includes a first angled portion, a second angled portion and a center portion disposed between and coupling the first and second angled portions together. The first angled portion is coupled to the first rotor shaft; the second angled portion is coupled to the second rotor shaft. The first and second angled portions are angled with respect to a first axis passing through the first and second rotor shafts such that the center portion has a second axis that is offset from and at least substantially parallel to the first axis.
A method of reducing the weight of a utility compactor and reducing a start-up torque required to rotate an eccentric vibratory shaft that vibrates the roller of the compactor is disclosed. The disclosed method includes: providing an eccentric vibratory shaft including a first rotor shaft coaxially spaced apart from a second rotor shaft, the first and second rotor shafts being coupled together by an offset shaft, the offset shaft including a first angled portion, a second angled and second angled portions being angled with respect to a first axis passing through the first and second rotor shafts such that the center portion is offset from and at least substantially parallel to the first axis; removing a preexisting eccentric vibratory shaft from the compactor; and replacing the removed preexisting vibratory shaft with the provided eccentric vibratory shaft.
Referring to
The first compacting roller 14 includes a first vibratory mechanism 26 that is operatively connected to a first hydraulic motor 28. The second compacting roller 16 includes a second vibratory mechanism 30 that is operatively connected to a second hydraulic motor 42. In as much as the first compacting roller 14 and the second compacting roller 16 are structurally and operatively similar, the description, construction and elements comprising the first compacting roller 14, as shown in
Referring now to
The pump 24 may be operatively connected to the first hydraulic motor 28 by hoses or conduits, shown schematically in
The coupling 44 is connected to a first rotor shaft 48 which, in turn, forms part of the eccentric shaft 46 and is connected to a first angled portion 49 of the eccentric shaft 46. The first angled portion 49 is connected to a center portion 51 which, in turn, is connected to a second angled portion 52. The second angled portion 52 is connected to a second rotor shaft 53. The first and second rotor shafts 48, 53 are accommodated within first and second bearings 56, 58 respectively and are coaxial with respect to each other. The first bearing 56 is accommodated within a first bracket 64 that is mounted on the first vertical support 43. The first bracket 64 passes through a third bearing 66 which supports the rubber mounts 36 as they rotate about the first bearing 56 and bearing housing 68 with the rotation of the coupling 44 under the power of the first hydraulic motor 28. The second bearing 58 is connected to the second vertical support 45 by way of the second bracket 62. Like the stationary first bracket 64, the second bracket 62 similarly does not rotate with respect to the second vertical support 45.
One difference between the eccentric shaft 5 of
It has been found that to minimize the start-up torque, weight and cost, the ratio of the first moment of inertia to the second moment of inertia should be maximized. For example, the ratio of the first moment of inertia to the second moment of inertia of one disclosed eccentric shaft 46 is about 13.4 m−1, but can range from about 10 to about 16 m−1, while ratio of the first moment of inertia to the second moment of inertia of the prior art shaft 5 is about 7.2 m−1.
For a roller 14 having a width of about 1 m (40 in.), the eccentric shaft 46 of
Another difference between the shaft of
During use of the work machine 10, an operator actuates the power source or hydraulic pump 24 so that the rollers 14, 16 rotate in the desired direction of travel. Rotating the rollers 14, 16 in this manner causes the work machine 10 to move in a forward or reverse direction over the material to be compacted.
At startup, before actually driving the work machine 10 onto the mat 12 be compacted, the operator request vibration from the user interface. This causes the controller (not shown) to command the power sources or hydraulic pumps 22, 24 to increase to full output. While the motors 28, 42 are accelerating, rotation of the vibratory mechanism 26 is initiated thereby causing the shaft 46 to rotate in an accelerated fashion until it reaches the operating frequency, e.g., 65 Hz. The start up time required to reach 65 Hz, or typical operating frequency, is about 4 seconds. The start-up can be easily achieved without undue wear and tear on the hydraulic motor 28 and hydraulic pump 24 of the work machine 10 as the reduced moment of inertia of the shaft 46 contributes substantially to this easy start up.
The disclosed shaft 46 may also be substituted for an existing shaft 5 without undue modification to an existing work machine 10.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4113403 | Tertinek et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4367054 | Salani et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4411081 | King | Oct 1983 | A |
4619552 | Sadahiro | Oct 1986 | A |
4632599 | Sadahiro | Dec 1986 | A |
5341057 | Yamaguchi et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5857388 | Killion et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5934825 | Waldenberger | Aug 1999 | A |
6237442 | Killion | May 2001 | B1 |
6241420 | Perrin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6402424 | Mitsui | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6516679 | Yates et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6558072 | Staffenhagen et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6561729 | Potts | May 2003 | B1 |
6626063 | Killion | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6637280 | Potts | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6837650 | Magee et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
20090143952 | Chisholm et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 103 662 | Oct 2002 | EP |
WO-2010096620 | Aug 2010 | WO |