The present invention relates generally to containers for retaining, protecting, and displaying produce and other retail goods and making such containers. More particularly, the present application relates to a low-cost, single-blank retail goods container having hinged platforms which are easily movable between closed and open positions.
Flat sheets of corrugated fiberboard or paperboard, typically referred to as blanks, have been used for many years as the starting material to form containers. For ease of description, corrugated fiberboard will be used by way of example, but paperboard is also contemplated. Corrugated fiberboard generally refers to a multi-layer sheet material comprised of two sheets of liner bonded to a central corrugated layer of medium. Given a basic size requirement specified by the customer, industry standards, and the preference for low cost, fiberboard container manufacturers strive to provide structural stacking strength with a minimal amount of corrugated fiberboard. A typical well-known container is a single piece tray design having a bottom wall, two side walls, and two end walls each hinged to the bottom wall. Typically, a single piece of corrugated fiberboard will be cut and scored to form a flat blank that will then be erected into this container.
Typical containers for the support and transport of food articles and other retail goods are corrugated containers having fixed configurations. These containers must be filled, stacked, transported, and later unstacked on-site for display or storage purposes. One method of facilitating the stacking of containers is to provide shoulders or platforms partially covering the top openings of the containers. While this approach makes it easier to stack boxes without the boxes falling into each other (i.e., “nesting”), it has the negative result of making the container more difficult to load and unload. Further, there is a direct relationship between the coverage of the stacking platform and improved stacking ability, but there is also a direct relationship between the coverage of the platform and the difficulty of loading and unloading the container.
A packed container of produce or retail goods will generally hold a weight suitable for handling by an individual. Such containers will be generally rectangular and have variable dimensions. Further, these containers will normally be stacked for transport and storage. The cost of labor, in the form of the time required to handle the produce and to assemble the shipping containers, can be a significant factor in the overall cost of the produce. Many current containers can only be assembled by hand, a method that is costly and time consuming. Assembling fiberboard containers for setup by a machine where cooperating adjoining fiberboard sections are adhesively bonded to form the container can reduce cost and time.
It is important in the production, distribution, and sale of perishable and non-perishable articles, such as produce and case ready meat products, that the articles are safely, economically, and conveniently stored for transport and safely and securely shipped for sale. Safe and secure storage and shipping is particularly a problem if heavy items must be placed in containers that are stacked upon each other. Stackable meat and containers often acquire, for example, bulging side or end walls, deformed bottom walls, or smashed corners that damage the produce due to, for example, the weight or movement of the produce during shipment. Further, if the environment in which the fiberboard container is shipped or stored is refrigerated, the moisture present in a refrigerated environment is likely to be absorbed by and weaken the container. Thus, it is important to ensure that maximum stability is maintained in a container throughout the shipping process so that a container holds up to forces on the container from goods packaged in the container, from other containers stacked atop the container, and from general handling of the container.
Once the food product reaches a retail destination, the product is removed from the container and put on sale for use. Removing the food from the container is time consuming. This can be especially difficult if the container has platforms partially covering the top of the container and the person unloading the container must reach around the platforms to get to the food products.
Thus, it is desirable to provide a container for transporting goods that is both durable and secure to prevent corrugation failure and damage to contents, and yet is easily stacked, loaded, and unloaded.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a container is provided which is economical to manufacture and easy to stack and which also provides easy access to space within the container for purposes of loading and unloading the container.
According to one embodiment of the present invention, a container is provided with hinged platforms which are movable between closed positions, wherein the platforms make it easy to stack containers atop one another, and opened positions, wherein the hinged platforms do not impede access to the interior of the container and the container is easily loaded and unloaded.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a container is provided with corner reinforcement flaps which strengthen container side walls to prevent nesting and container failure.
Other objects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings.
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, a specific embodiment thereof has been shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in detail. It should be understood, however, that it is not intended to limit the invention to the particular forms disclosed but, on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
A successful design for a container must overcome many obstacles to achieve superior performance. A container must be inexpensive and easy to assemble. At the same time, a container must have tremendous structural integrity to prevent damage to primary packaged goods that could occur if the container were to collapse. This structural integrity must be maintained against forces encountered when containers are stacked and transported. Further, the containers must be easy to stack atop one another and, when stacked, the containers must retain great stacking strength and stability. A container may incorporate holes in its side walls to allow for access holes and airflow vents. In some applications, is also desirable for a container to be displayable to consumers at stores and to allow for the greatest amount of goods to be contained within the container while using a limited amount of material.
In the past, attempted solutions to these problems have led to their own resultant problems, since solving one problem often exacerbates another. For example, corner structures that increase stacking strength commonly include elements that protrude into the container, reducing the amount of goods or rectilinear primaries the container can hold and making it more difficult to load and unload the container.
Finally, even containers that feature acceptable stacking strength and structural integrity often encounter the problem of nesting. Nesting arises when a stacked container falls into a lower container. This may arise when the walls of a lower container bulge or when stacking tabs misalign slightly, leaving the upper container free to be jostled about during shipment. Nesting can result in goods in a lower container being crushed by the stacked container. If lower containers in a stack become nested unevenly, an entire stack of containers can topple. The problem of nesting has been dealt with in the past by using platforms or shoulders extending across container openings, but these platforms or shoulders make containers more difficult to load and unload.
An economical, stackable container 10, as shown in
The end panels are provided with first and second hinged platform structures 22, 24 having first and second top platforms 26, 28. The first and second hinged platform structures 22, 24 are movable from closed positions, as shown in
It is important that the container 10 retain structural integrity and anti-nesting properties during loading, shipping, and unloading of the container 10. Structural integrity can be maintained through the use of vertical fluting in support surfaces as well as through the use of reinforcing members, and anti-nesting properties are primarily maintained through the positioning of the top platforms 26, 28 in their closed positions. The overall strength of the container 10 and the proper positioning of the top platforms 26, 28 are both enhanced by the use of side reinforcement flaps. First and second side reinforcement flaps 38, 40 are integral with the first hinged platform structure 24 and extend from the first top platform 26 to the first end folding flap 34. Third and fourth side reinforcement flaps 42, 44 extend from the second top platform 28 to the second end folding flap 36.
Corner integrity and the stacking platform is further enhanced through the use of first, second, third, and fourth minor platform panels 46, 48, 50, 52. The minor platform panels 46, 48, 50, 52 may be formed from panels connected, respectively, to the first, second, third, and fourth side reinforcement flaps 38, 40, 42, 44, and they serve to add structural stability to the hinged platform structures 22, 24 and further to hold the side reinforcement flaps 38–44 in upright positions to assure their continued integrity. The minor platform panels 46–52 may be adhesively connected to the top platforms 26, 28. In some embodiments, the minor platform panels 46–52 are connected to the top of the top platforms 26, 28 while, in other embodiments, the minor platform panels 46–52 are connected to the bottom of the top platforms 26, 28 (see
The overall strength of the container 10 is also improved through the use of multiple plies of material along walls of the container 10. For example, first, second, third, and fourth minor interior wall flaps 54, 56, 58, 60 may be used to enhance the stability of the first and second end panels 18, 20 (due to perspective, first and second minor interior wall flaps 54, 56 are not visible in
The strength of the container 10 against stresses applied from outside is enhanced through the maximization of vertical fluting in the construction. Vertical fluting refers to the pattern of corrugated construction running in a vertical direction along support walls, and a container which employs vertical fluting is stronger against vertically directed forces than containers having fluting in other directions. As shown by the cutaway “A” in
The container 10 is preferably easily and economically manufactured from a single blank. Turning now to
Continuing to
Next, as illustrated in
Turning now to
Several alternative structures may make use of the principles of the present invention. For example,
Turning now to
Turning now to
While the present invention has been described with reference to one or more particular embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that many changes may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. For example, tear-tape may be provided along the hinges 30, 32 of the container to allow for easy removal of the hinged platform structures 22, 24 once the container 10 has reached its destination. Further, rather than having only two hinged platform structures 22, 24, the container 10 may be provided with four platform structures which articulate independently of each other. Each of these embodiments and obvious variations thereof is contemplated as falling within the spirit and scope of the claimed invention, which is set forth in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/902,197 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,808,107, filed on Jul. 10, 2001, is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1125535 | Hoffman | Jan 1915 | A |
2130445 | Bemiss | Sep 1938 | A |
2407111 | Thompson | Sep 1946 | A |
2450035 | De Mian | Sep 1948 | A |
2652185 | Acker | Sep 1953 | A |
2942770 | Eichorn | Jun 1960 | A |
2983424 | Glass | May 1961 | A |
3111254 | Thyen | Nov 1963 | A |
3306516 | Taylor | Feb 1967 | A |
3669341 | Hughes | Jun 1972 | A |
3820706 | Gibson et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3863831 | Wozniacki et al. | Feb 1975 | A |
3869077 | Tuura | Mar 1975 | A |
3871570 | Garmon | Mar 1975 | A |
3910484 | Wozniacki | Oct 1975 | A |
3910487 | Jaeschke | Oct 1975 | A |
3940053 | Putman et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
4053098 | Baptist | Oct 1977 | A |
4053100 | Baptist | Oct 1977 | A |
4082215 | Eichenauer | Apr 1978 | A |
4101048 | Rieben et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4117929 | VanderMey | Oct 1978 | A |
4121753 | Westfall | Oct 1978 | A |
4151948 | de la Fuente, Jr. | May 1979 | A |
4170297 | Johnson | Oct 1979 | A |
4175691 | Cornell et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4185741 | Schiff et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4191288 | Hostad | Mar 1980 | A |
4228898 | Zeitter et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4234081 | Champlin | Nov 1980 | A |
4284195 | Champlin | Aug 1981 | A |
4291830 | Sorensen | Sep 1981 | A |
4300680 | Champlin | Nov 1981 | A |
4304351 | Stollberg | Dec 1981 | A |
4323188 | Dickerson | Apr 1982 | A |
4324328 | Champlin | Apr 1982 | A |
4335843 | Kent | Jun 1982 | A |
4347969 | Kost et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4349147 | Jensen | Sep 1982 | A |
4385721 | Olsen et al. | May 1983 | A |
4391405 | Drinon | Jul 1983 | A |
4418863 | Kimbrell, Sr. | Dec 1983 | A |
4441649 | Nederveld | Apr 1984 | A |
4511080 | Madsen et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4526317 | Cassidy | Jul 1985 | A |
4537344 | Thomas | Aug 1985 | A |
4567996 | Muise | Feb 1986 | A |
4570790 | Turnage | Feb 1986 | A |
4600142 | Quaintance | Jul 1986 | A |
4613045 | Watson | Sep 1986 | A |
4645122 | Nederveld | Feb 1987 | A |
4676429 | Crowe et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4770339 | Weimer | Sep 1988 | A |
4787515 | Stoll | Nov 1988 | A |
4852756 | Holladay | Aug 1989 | A |
4883221 | Brundage | Nov 1989 | A |
4884739 | Nederveld | Dec 1989 | A |
4884741 | Nederveld | Dec 1989 | A |
4946093 | Moorman | Aug 1990 | A |
4949898 | Nederveld | Aug 1990 | A |
5000377 | McClure | Mar 1991 | A |
5002224 | Muise | Mar 1991 | A |
5052615 | Edward et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5125567 | McClure | Jun 1992 | A |
5139196 | Fry et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5163609 | Muise, Jr. | Nov 1992 | A |
5183202 | Love | Feb 1993 | A |
5261594 | Brown et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5263612 | Nederveld | Nov 1993 | A |
5277360 | DeMott | Jan 1994 | A |
5285956 | Piepho | Feb 1994 | A |
5289970 | McClure | Mar 1994 | A |
5294044 | Clark | Mar 1994 | A |
5330094 | Mertz | Jul 1994 | A |
5333777 | Roth | Aug 1994 | A |
5361975 | Droste et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5361976 | Blomfield | Nov 1994 | A |
5370303 | Fry | Dec 1994 | A |
5386937 | Crawford | Feb 1995 | A |
5392985 | Smith et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5429296 | Southwell et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5458272 | Ward-Weber | Oct 1995 | A |
5458283 | Southwell et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5499764 | Carlsson | Mar 1996 | A |
5516034 | Jensen | May 1996 | A |
5535941 | Garza | Jul 1996 | A |
5649663 | Pestow, Jr. | Jul 1997 | A |
5673848 | Garza | Oct 1997 | A |
5687902 | Tusing et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5704193 | Roe et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5752597 | Brangle, Jr. | May 1998 | A |
5860590 | Blomfield et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6286753 | Jackson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302323 | Southwell | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6808107 | Jackson | Oct 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2728867 | Dec 1994 | FR |
9943560 | Sep 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050116018 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09902197 | Jul 2001 | US |
Child | 10935253 | US |