Eddy current braking systems may use centrifugal force to cause rotors to expand into a magnetic field. Centrifugal eddy current devices require significant support structure in the rotating rotor assembly to support the centrifugally deploying electrically conductive members, and to ensure that they remain in plane during deployment so that they don't make contact with magnets. Because of the complexity, structure, part count, and mass of incorporating the biasing mechanism(s) into a rotating assembly in which the electrically conductive members deploy centrifugally, the systems contain a significant amount of rotational inertia. Because of this, the initiation of eddy-current braking can be delayed during deployment, and/or completion of braking can be delayed once the load motion has ceased. Furthermore, this delay is intrinsic to the design and cannot be controlled or adjusted without redesigning the unit.
Even with such extensive support structure, such devices still require very exacting tolerances to allow the peripherally mounted conductive members to reliably move on the same plane into the magnetic field. If a conductive member's pivot is out of tolerance even by very slight amounts (something that can occur due to material defect or if a device has been dropped or suffered an impact) the conductive member can make contact with a magnet during braking, thereby damaging the device and preventing correct rotor deployment.
Heat dissipation is also an issue. Because eddy current braking systems convert kinetic (e.g., rotational) energy into heat, effectively removing the heat before the various components of the braking system are damaged is a design criteria. Centrifugal devices rely on smooth sided, low-friction conductive members to centrifugally deploy into the magnetic field while sliding against a constraining structure. Because of this, conductive member heat dissipation (an important factor in eddy current braking) is extremely limited.
For eddy current braking systems that include a retraction spring, such as self-retracting lifelines, auto belay devices and recreational self-retracting descent devices, a device with a heavier rotor assembly retracts more slowly and requires a larger and more robust retraction spring to perform the same work. Because of the limitations of acceptable device size, a larger retraction spring may not be an option, resulting in a device that cannot handle high cyclic usage (e.g., the retraction spring fatigues and fails rapidly).
Centrifugal eddy current devices often include multiple biasing elements, one for each deploying rotor. This both increases the complexity of the device and makes bias adjustment more difficult. Indeed, most centrifugal systems are not provided with adjustable biasing which would allow a device to be used in different applications. Rather, centrifugal systems are provided with a manufacturer-selected fixed bias that is determined based on the average load conditions expected for the end-use of the device. In addition, the sheer complexity of the centrifugal design contributes to a high manufacturing cost and a high servicing cost.
The eddy current braking systems described herein utilize a direct mechanical linkage activated by an applied load to move a conductor closer to a magnetic field generated by a magnet assembly (either by moving the conductor, moving the magnet assembly, or both). Through the mechanical linkage, the amount of load applied dictates the distance between the conductor and magnet assembly, thereby causing the braking force to vary with the applied load. The applied load causes a rotation of the device proximate a magnetic field to generate the braking force. Most of the examples described herein will be described in terms of a line dispensing device such as an autobelay or descending device in which the load is applied by the payload being lowered by the device. The reader, however, will understand that the load controlled braking devices described herein could be adapted to any number of devices and uses beyond those presented in the drawings.
In one aspect, the technology relates to: an apparatus having: a rotatable first portion of a magnetic braking system having a first element disposed thereon, wherein the first portion is rotatable about a rotatable first axis, and wherein a position of the first element is disposed a fixed distance from the rotatable first axis; a second portion of the magnetic braking system having a second element disposed thereon, wherein at least one of the first element and the second element generates a magnetic field; and a spring for biasing the rotatable first portion a first distance from the second portion, wherein upon application of a force to at least one of the rotatable first portion and the second portion, a relative position of the rotatable first portion to the second portion is reduced to a second distance less than the first distance. In an embodiment, the second portion is rotatable about a second axis. In another embodiment, a position of the second element is disposed a fixed distance from the second axis. In yet another embodiment, the first element includes a plurality of magnets and the second element includes a conductor. In still another embodiment,
the first element has a conductor and the second element has a plurality of magnets.
In another embodiment of the above aspect, the apparatus further includes: a rotatable drum; a length of material wound about the drum; and wherein the force is applied to at least one of the rotatable first portion and the second portion by a weight applied to the length of material. In an embodiment, the length of material includes a length of at least one of a webbing, a cable, a rope, and a chain. In another embodiment, a rotation of the rotatable drum causes a corresponding rotation of the rotatable first portion. In yet another embodiment, the apparatus further includes a plurality of gears disposed between the rotatable drum and the rotatable first portion.
In another aspect, the technology relates to an apparatus having: a first portion of a magnetic braking system having a first element, wherein the first element is arranged in an array, wherein the first element is a first fixed distance from a first datum; a second portion of the magnetic braking system having a second element, wherein the second element is a second fixed distance from a second datum, wherein at least one of the first element and the second element generates a magnetic field; a linkage connecting the first portion and the second portion, wherein an application of a force to the linkage changes a position of the first datum relative to the second datum. In an embodiment, the first portion is rotatable about the first datum. In another embodiment, the second portion is rotatable about the second datum. In yet another embodiment, the linkage has a biasing element configured to bias the first datum a first distance away from the second datum, and wherein the application of the force moves the first datum relative to the second datum. In still another embodiment, the application of the force moves the first portion to a second distance relative to the second datum, wherein the second distance is less than the first distance.
In another embodiment of the above aspect, the apparatus further includes: a rotatable drum; a length of material wound about the drum; and wherein a rotation of the rotatable drum generates a corresponding rotation of at least one of the first portion and the second portion. In an embodiment, a weight applied to the length of material generates the force applied to the linkage. In another embodiment, the array includes a plurality of first elements. In yet another embodiment, the array defines: a first subset of first elements disposed a first subset distance from the first datum; and a second subset of first elements disposed a second subset distance from the first datum. In still another embodiment, the first subset includes a first number of first elements and wherein the second subset includes a second number of first elements, and wherein the second subset is different than the first subset.
In another embodiment of the above aspect, the first subset includes a first density per a fixed unit area of first elements and wherein the second subset includes a second density per the fixed unit area of first elements, and wherein the second subset is different than the first subset. In an embodiment, the first subset includes a first area of first elements and wherein the second subset includes a second area of first elements, and wherein the second subset is different than the first subset.
In another aspect, the technology relates to a method including: positioning a first portion at a first distance to a second portion, wherein: the first portion has a first element of a magnetic braking system, and wherein the first element is a first fixed distance from a first datum; and the second portion has a second element of the magnetic braking system, wherein the second element is a second fixed distance from a second datum, and wherein at least one of the first element and the second element generates a magnetic field; and applying a force to a linkage connecting the first portion and the second portion, wherein the application of the force to the linkage changes a position of the first datum relative to the second datum.
There are shown in the drawings, examples which are presently preferred, it being understood, however, that the technology is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
Several configurations of eddy braking systems are contemplated and depicted in the following figures.
The datums 110, 112 define points by which to measure the spacing between the first portion 102 and the second portion 104. For example, in one condition of the braking system 100, the datums 110, 112 are separated by a first distance D. In a second condition, the datums 110, 112 are separated by a second distance D′ that is less than the first distance D. As the distance D between the datums 110, 112 is reduced, the conductor elements 106 and magnetic elements 108 overlap, thereby causing the braking force to vary with an applied load force F. Additionally or alternatively, the second condition can contemplate a closer proximity or shorter distance between the conductor elements 106 and magnetic elements can also generate a higher braking force. In general, the farther the conductor 106 penetrates the magnetic field generated by the magnets 108, the greater the braking force applied. Each of the datums 110, 112 serve as reference points for the conductor elements 106 and/or magnetic elements 108. For example, in the example depicted in
As the distance D between datums 110, 112 is reduced to the shorter distance D′, the conductor element 106A moves into a magnetic field generated by the magnetic element 108A. Movement of the datums 110, 112 can be caused by the application of a force, as described in various examples below. If one of the portions 102, 104 is rotating R, a magnetic force generated on the conductor element 106 by the magnetic element 108 begins to slow rotation R of that portion 102, 104. As the datums 110, 102 move closer together, the conductor element 106 further overlaps the magnetic element, such that a greater magnetic force is applied, further slowing the rotation R. This helps apply a braking force that is directly related to, e.g., a weight force acting upon the system 100, as described below. It is desirable that the portions 102, 104 do not contact each other, as this may cause damage and failure of the system 100. As such, the portions 102, 104 may be disposed in different planes such that facing edges 114, 116 may overlap as the datums 110, 112 move closer together.
With regard to specific examples depicted in the figures,
In
In
The following figures depict generally eddy current braking systems that incorporate these and other examples of configurations of magnetic and electrically-conductive elements. These non-limiting examples may be further modified as will be apparent to a person of skill in the art upon reading the specification. As such, other eddy current braking systems including different magnetic element and conductive element configurations are contemplated. For example, although the following examples depict auto-belay and other fall-protection systems, other applications of the braking systems described herein are contemplated. The braking systems may be used to provide a braking force a car such as a roller coaster or train. That is, the systems can be integrated into the wheels of the car and braking systems that apply a braking force to those wheels. Vertical configurations (e.g., for elevator systems) are also contemplated. Additionally, the cable or webbing being unrolled from the drums described below can be unrolled in a horizontal configuration (e.g., on a zipline system, or other substantially linear conveyance system). Such systems can include loading and unloading systems for the movement of goods from cargo vessels, and so on.
A biasing element 216 is fixed at an anchor 218 and connected at an opposite end to the linkage 212 and drum gear 204 so as to bias the drum gear 204 (upward in the depicted
A biasing element 616 is fixed at an anchor 618 to the first linkage 612 and fixed at an anchor 634 to the second linkage 632, so as to bias the datums 626, 628 away from each other. As the weight W applies a force F to the webbing 602, the linkages 612, 632 pivot about the fixed pivot point 614. This, in turn, compresses the biasing element 616 so as to move the datums 626, 628 closer to each other. As such, the second portion 620 moves between the disks 608A, 608B of the first portion 608. Heavier weights may generate forces that further reduce the distance between the first datum 626 and the second datum 628, thus moving the conductive material 610 deeper into the magnetic field created by the magnets 622. As such, heavier weights W are subjected to stronger braking forces to more effectively slow the weight W. A positive stop mechanism formed as a bar 636 extending from the linkage 612 controls the overlap of the magnetic field and the conductor element 610 and prevents contact between the first portion 608 and the second portion 620.
The second portion 720 and the drum 701 are connected via a linkage 712 to a biasing element 716 that is fixed at an anchor 718. The linkage 712 has a fixed pivot point 714. The biasing force B biases datums 726, 728 into the position of
A biasing element 916 is fixed at an anchor 918 and connected at an opposite end to the linkage 912 so as to position the second portion 920 such that the magnets 922 are oriented in a first orientation. As the weight W applies a force F to the webbing 902, the linkage 912 changes a position of the second portion 920 (more specifically, changes an orientation of the magnets 922 by rotating R a shaft 920A). When unloaded by weight W, the magnets 922 may be in an orientation such that the magnetic field generated thereby does not form a braking force on the conductive element 910. Lighter weights W that generate lower forces F may only rotate the shaft 920A and magnets 922 slightly, so a lower magnetic force is applied to the rotating conductive element 910. Heavier weights may generate forces that further rotate the shaft 920A and magnets 922, so a higher magnetic force is applied to the rotating conductive element 910. As such, heavier weights W are subjected to stronger braking forces to more effectively slow the weight W.
It is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited to the particular structures, process steps, or materials disclosed herein, but is extended to equivalents thereof as would be recognized by those ordinarily skilled in the relevant arts. It should also be understood that terminology employed herein is used for the purpose of describing particular examples only and is not intended to be limiting. It must be noted that, as used in this specification, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
It will be clear that the systems and methods described herein are well adapted to attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those inherent therein. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the methods, devices, and systems within this specification may be implemented in many manners and as such is not to be limited by the foregoing exemplified examples and examples. In this regard, any number of the features of the different examples described herein may be combined into one single example and alternate examples having fewer than or more than all of the features herein described are possible.
This disclosure described some examples of the present technology with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which only some of the possible examples were shown. Other aspects may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the examples set forth herein. Rather, these examples were provided so that this disclosure was thorough and complete and fully conveyed the scope of the possible examples to those skilled in the art.
Although specific examples were described herein, the scope of the technology is not limited to those specific examples. One skilled in the art will recognize other examples or improvements that are within the scope and spirit of the present technology. Therefore, the specific structure, acts, or media are disclosed only as illustrative examples. The scope of the technology is defined by the following claims and any equivalents therein.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/039,731, filed Aug. 20, 2014, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2058024 | Logan, Jr. | Oct 1936 | A |
2112312 | Cassion et al. | Jun 1938 | A |
2122315 | Fosty et al. | Jun 1938 | A |
2409009 | Bakke | Oct 1946 | A |
2428104 | Winther | Sep 1947 | A |
2492776 | Winther | Dec 1949 | A |
2771171 | Schultz | Nov 1956 | A |
3364795 | Coye De Casetlet | Jan 1968 | A |
3447006 | Bair | May 1969 | A |
3721394 | Reiser | Mar 1973 | A |
3723795 | Baermann | Mar 1973 | A |
3759190 | Harvey | Sep 1973 | A |
3962595 | Eddens | Jun 1976 | A |
3967794 | Fohl | Jul 1976 | A |
4078719 | Durland et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4224545 | Powell | Sep 1980 | A |
4271944 | Hanson | Jun 1981 | A |
4416430 | Totten | Nov 1983 | A |
4434971 | Cordrey | Mar 1984 | A |
4544111 | Nakajima | Oct 1985 | A |
4545575 | Forjot | Oct 1985 | A |
4561605 | Nakajima | Dec 1985 | A |
4567963 | Sugimoto | Feb 1986 | A |
4612469 | Muramatsu | Sep 1986 | A |
4690066 | Morishita et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4938435 | Varner et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4957644 | Price et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5054587 | Matsui et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5064029 | Araki et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5205386 | Goodman et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5254061 | Leask | Oct 1993 | A |
5342000 | Berges | Aug 1994 | A |
5429319 | Bogucki-Land | Jul 1995 | A |
5441137 | Organek et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5465815 | Ikegami | Nov 1995 | A |
5636804 | Jeung | Jun 1997 | A |
5692693 | Yamaguchi | Dec 1997 | A |
5711404 | Lee | Jan 1998 | A |
5712520 | Lamb | Jan 1998 | A |
5722612 | Feathers | Mar 1998 | A |
5742986 | Corrion et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5779178 | McCarty | Jul 1998 | A |
5791584 | Kuroiwa | Aug 1998 | A |
5822874 | Nemes | Oct 1998 | A |
5862891 | Kroger et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5928300 | Rogers et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6041897 | Saumweber et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6042517 | Gunther et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6051897 | Wissler et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6062350 | Spieldiener et al. | May 2000 | A |
6086005 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6279682 | Feathers | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286637 | Park | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293376 | Pribonic | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6360669 | Albrich | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6412611 | Pribonic | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6460828 | Gersemsky | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6533083 | Pribonic | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6523650 | Pribonic | May 2003 | B1 |
6557673 | Desta et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6561451 | Steinich | May 2003 | B1 |
6640727 | Ostrobrod | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6659237 | Pribonic | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6756870 | Kuwahara | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6793203 | Heinrichs et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6810818 | Petzl et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6810997 | Scheiber et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6918469 | Pribonic | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6962235 | Leon | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6973999 | Ikuta et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7011607 | Kolda et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7014026 | Drussel et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7018324 | Lin | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7279055 | Schuler | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7281612 | Hsieh | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7281620 | Wolner | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7513334 | Calver | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7528514 | Cruz et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7966941 | Brannan | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7894796 | Pribonic | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8272476 | Hartman et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8424460 | Lerner et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8490751 | Allington et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8511434 | Blomberg | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8556234 | Hartman et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8567561 | Strasser et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8601951 | Lerner | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8851235 | Allington et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
9016435 | Allington et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9033115 | Lerner | May 2015 | B2 |
9962588 | Allington et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
10020720 | Diehl et al. | Jul 2018 | B2 |
20020162477 | Palumbo | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020179372 | Schreiber et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030116391 | Desta et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030189380 | Ishikawa | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030211914 | Perkins et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040055836 | Pribonic | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040073346 | Roelleke | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040074715 | Johansson | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040168855 | Leon | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194101 | Bytnar et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050117258 | Ohta et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050189830 | Corbin et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050263356 | Marzano et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060243545 | Chen | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060278478 | Pribonic et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070000741 | Pribonic | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070135561 | Rath et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070228202 | Scharf et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070228713 | Takemura | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256906 | Jin et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070298935 | Badarneh | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080059028 | Willerton | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080074223 | Pribonic | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080087510 | Pribonic | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080105503 | Pribonic | May 2008 | A1 |
20080135579 | Bertram et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090026303 | Schmitz et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090114892 | Lesko | May 2009 | A1 |
20090166459 | Niitsuma et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090178887 | Reeves et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090211846 | Taylor | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100032255 | Conti et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100065373 | Stone et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100112224 | Lott | May 2010 | A1 |
20100211239 | Christensen et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110114907 | Hartman et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110147125 | Blomberg | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110175473 | Kitabatake et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110313607 | Checketts | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120055740 | Allington et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120312540 | Lefebvre | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130048422 | Hartman et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130087433 | Sejourne | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130118842 | Lerner et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130186721 | Bogdanowicz et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130216351 | Griffin | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140110947 | Mongeau | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140224597 | Takezawa et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140346909 | Vogler et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140375158 | Allington et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150196820 | Allington et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150266454 | McGowan | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20160052400 | McGowan et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160317936 | Diehl et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160360738 | Richardson | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170237313 | Diehl et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170274261 | Allington et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170328424 | Allington et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170338728 | Diehl et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2010221817 | Oct 2011 | AU |
2789535 | Sep 2010 | CA |
1262196 | Aug 2000 | CN |
1325362 | Dec 2001 | CN |
1370702 | Sep 2002 | CN |
1783674 | Jun 2006 | CN |
202203305 | Aug 2011 | CN |
102428633 | Apr 2012 | CN |
102497085 | Jun 2012 | CN |
102627063 | Aug 2012 | CN |
102652029 | Aug 2012 | CN |
103244577 | Apr 2013 | CN |
103326538 | Sep 2013 | CN |
106100285 | Nov 2016 | CN |
674761 | Apr 1939 | DE |
9300966 | Mar 1993 | DE |
102005032694 | Jan 2007 | DE |
102007022883 | Dec 2008 | DE |
84140 | Jul 1983 | EP |
84140 | Jul 1983 | EP |
460494 | Dec 1991 | EP |
1043265 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1244565 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1401087 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1432101 | Jun 2004 | EP |
1480320 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1564868 | Aug 2005 | EP |
2406872 | Jan 2012 | EP |
721748 | Jan 1955 | GB |
908128 | Oct 1962 | GB |
1593348 | Jul 1981 | GB |
2352644 | Feb 2001 | GB |
2352645 | Feb 2001 | GB |
2352784 | Feb 2001 | GB |
2357563 | Jun 2001 | GB |
S 60259278 | Dec 1985 | JP |
S62247753 | Oct 1987 | JP |
5296287 | Nov 1993 | JP |
H05296287 | Nov 1993 | JP |
8252025 | Oct 1996 | JP |
10098868 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10140536 | May 1998 | JP |
10252025 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11119680 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11189701 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11315662 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000-316272 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-17041 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2011200002 | Oct 2011 | JP |
2012520655 | Sep 2012 | JP |
2015122952 | Jul 2015 | JP |
575464 | Jul 2010 | NZ |
WO 9516496 | Jun 1995 | WO |
199617149 | Jun 1996 | WO |
199847215 | Oct 1998 | WO |
200138123 | May 2001 | WO |
2003055560 | Jul 2003 | WO |
2008139127 | Nov 2008 | WO |
2009047469 | Apr 2009 | WO |
2009108040 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009127142 | Oct 2009 | WO |
20100108484 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2010104405 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2011079266 | Jun 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application PCT/US2015/046172, dated Dec. 9, 2015, 15 pgs. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application PCT/US2015/046171, dated Feb. 26, 2016, 21 pgs. |
PCT Partial Search Report in International Application PCT/US2015/046171, dated Dec. 9, 2015, 8 pgs. |
Climbing Wall Descent Controllers—Instruction Manual v3, Aug. 18, 2008, pp. 1-20. |
TruBlue Auto Belay User Manual, Model TB150-12C, 27 pages. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application PCT-NZ2010/00011, dated Feb. 23, 2011, 11 pages. |
MSA, The Safety Company, Stop Use Notice for Redpoint and Auto-Belay Descenders, dated Oct. 14, 2009, 1 page. |
European Office Action in Application 15759996.0, dated Nov. 21, 2018, 7 pages. |
European Office Action in Application 15759997.8, dated Nov. 26, 2018, 9 pages. |
Chinese Office Action in Application 201580056441.6, dated Dec. 27, 2018, 11 pages. |
Chinese Office Action in Application 201580056996.0, dated Dec. 27, 2018, 20 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160052401 A1 | Feb 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62039731 | Aug 2014 | US |