1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a sensor for the efficient inspection and measurement of objects such as semiconductor wafers upon which dielectric and conducting films are deposited.
2. Description of the Related Art
In the process of manufacturing integrated circuits, films are deposited on semiconductor wafers, etched, and overlaid by additional films to create the integrated circuits. The films may be either conducting metal films or dielectric films. Quality and thickness of a particular film layer is critical to the manufacturing process, and it is of particular interest to measure the thickness of a film layer quickly and accurately. Two types of measurement techniques are commonly used to measure thickness. Dielectric films are transparent and thickness may be measured using optical reflectance. Conducting metal film thickness may be measured using eddy current sensing techniques. Further, if the conducting metal film is thin enough, it is transparent or semi-transparent which allows the thickness of the film also to be measured using optical reflectance. Both techniques are known and used in the industry.
Optical reflectance may be used to determine characteristics such as thickness, index of refraction and index of extinction of transparent and semi-transparent films. Metal films with a thickness greater than a few tens of nanometers tend to be optically opaque to light having wavelengths between 200 and 1100 nanometers. As a result, optical reflectance measurements are ineffective to determine thickness for such films. Eddy current sensing may be used to measure sheet resistance, which is correlative of such electrically conducting film thickness. Thus eddy current sensing generally may be used to measure thick conducting films and optical reflectance sensing generally may be used to measure thin conducting films that are transparent or semi-transparent.
Eddy current sensing techniques do not work for measuring thickness of films which do not conduct electricity sufficiently such as dielectric films. As a result, it is necessary to rely on optical reflectance techniques to measure dielectric film thickness.
The optical reflectance of the conducting metal film can vary with surface oxidation and grain size. After a conducting metal film is deposited on a semiconductor wafer, an annealing step is carried out to stabilize the film, to improve the conductivity of the metal film by enhancing the size of the metal grains, and with the proper reduction agent, to clean oxide from the film. This annealing process changes the grain size of the conducting metal film which changes the optical reflectance characteristics and the sheet resistance. The change in film reflectance after annealing can be correlated to both oxide removal and grain size variations.
Moreover, eddy current sensing alone cannot distinguish whether sheet resistance varies because of film thickness or because of grain size change caused by the annealing process. Therefore, both optical reflectance measurements and eddy current sensing measurements are required to adequately determine thickness of a conducting metal film, and it is advantageous to take both measurements during a single inspection. Optical reflectance measurements can compensate for variations in sheet resistance due to grain size variations thereby allowing eddy current sensing measurements to correlate accurately with film thickness.
Both the optical reflectance and the eddy current sensing methods of inspecting conducting film are well known to skilled practitioners of the art. However, each method has been employed separately and apart from the other. In view of the foregoing, it would be desirable to be able to rely on different types of information derived from a combination of both optical reflectance and eddy current sensing measurements.
One feature of the invention is to provide both optical reflectance and eddy current measurements for determining film thickness. Reflectance measurements are useful to determine grain size, oxidation thickness, and film thickness when the film is transparent or semi-transparent. Both dielectric and conducting films may be inspected using optical reflectance measurements. However, only eddy current sensing techniques are useful in measuring sheet resistance of conducting film which is determinative of film thickness and grain size. Such eddy current measurements are typically made at a distance of a few microns to hundreds of microns from the film and cover an area of 1 to 2 square millimeters.
The inventive design enables both eddy current sensing and optical reflectance measurements to be taken sequentially or simultaneously. When both eddy current and optical reflectance measurements are made by the same sensor, either dielectric or conducting metal films may be inspected without changing the sensor. Thus, manufacturing time is reduced because any time needed to change sensor types to inspect different types of films is eliminated. Further, a film may be inspected while it remains in the process chamber thus eliminating time needed to move a wafer with a deposited film from a process chamber to an inspection chamber. Still further, multiple film layers may be inspected simultaneously provided a transparent dielectric film overlays a conducting metal film.
In accordance with the invention, a two optical fibers (or a bifurcated optic fiber having two channels) and an eddy current inspection coil are provided together. In one embodiment, the fibers may be placed co-axially within the coil. A first optical fiber is connected to either a broadband or a narrowband (laser) light source for illuminating the film. A second optical fiber is connected to a spectrometer or a monochromator which is equipped with a charge coupled device, a photodiode array, or a photodiode with a band pass filter to measure the reflected light intensity returning from the object through the second fiber. Without optical focusing, the area illuminated by the first fiber is about the same area as the area inspected by the eddy current sensor. However, some applications may require a smaller inspection area, and in those cases, a sensor which includes an optical focusing member may be used.
In another embodiment, the first and second optic fibers are mounted external to the eddy current sensor but are focused on the area to be inspected by the eddy current sensor. Connections to the light source and detector remain the same as in the first embodiment.
In still a further embodiment, an array of eddy current—optical reflectance (eddy-optic) sensors may be used to measure the uniformity of a film's properties, or a single such sensor may be used to measure the properties of the film at various locations by effecting relative movement between the sensor and the film, by moving either the sensor, or the film, or both.
These and other features and benefits of the invention will be readily appreciated in light of the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments thereof, given by way of example only with reference to the accompanying drawings wherein:
Preferred embodiments of the present invention will now be described with reference to the attached drawings, wherein identical elements are designated with like numerals.
The eddy-optic sensor offers clear and distinct advantages over other sensors to measure conducting film thickness. In a typical installation, referring to
The sensor also illuminates the film using a light source 130 which emits light is conducted by a first fiber 101 to a location at which film measurement is to be made. The light source 130 will be either a broadband light source or a laser having a wavelength in the range of 200 to 1100 nanometers (ultraviolet to near infrared). Light reflected by the conducting film 151 then is conducted by a second fiber 102 to a light detector 140. The light detector 140 may be a device such as a charge coupled device or a photodiode array, though any detector suitable for this purpose may be used. Measurements taken by the light detector 140 may be used to determine the thickness, the index of refraction and the index of extinction of transparent or semi-transparent films 151.
Relative distances of the light source 130 and light detector 140 from the film measurement location are not important to the implementation of the invention. Also, while the discussion has been provided in the context of conducting film, the optical reflectance aspect of the invention is also applicable to dielectric films.
As generally illustrated in
In another construction illustrated in
It may be desirable for the inspection chamber 400 to be used for another process of wafer manufacture such as a cool-down, anneal or metal deposition step, wherein eddy-optic inspection may proceed along with the other process, thereby reducing set-up time and increasing overall productivity.
With respect to the above description then, it is to be realized that the optimum dimensional relationships for the parts of the invention, to include variations in size, materials, shape, form, function and manner of operation, assembly and use, are deemed readily apparent and obvious to one skilled in the art, and all equivalent relationships to those illustrated in the drawings and described in the specification are intended to be encompassed by the present invention.
Therefore, the foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the principles of the invention. Further, since numerous modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact construction and operation shown and described, and accordingly, all suitable modifications and equivalents may be resorted to, falling within the scope of the invention.
This application is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/812,329, filed Mar. 19, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,608,495, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4005359 | Smoot | Jan 1977 | A |
4112365 | Larson et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4303885 | Davis et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4467281 | Davis et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4556845 | Strope et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4673877 | Sakamoto et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4715007 | Fujita et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4716366 | Hosoe et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4849694 | Coates | Jul 1989 | A |
4963500 | Cogan et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4977853 | Falcoff et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5001356 | Ichikawa | Mar 1991 | A |
5003262 | Egner et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5081796 | Schultz | Jan 1992 | A |
5140265 | Sakiyama et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5213655 | Leach et al. | May 1993 | A |
5237271 | Hedegren | Aug 1993 | A |
5343146 | Koch et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5355083 | George et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5357331 | Flockencier | Oct 1994 | A |
5413941 | Koos et al. | May 1995 | A |
5427878 | Corliss | Jun 1995 | A |
5433651 | Lustig | Jul 1995 | A |
5451863 | Freeman | Sep 1995 | A |
5511005 | Abbe et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5525903 | Mandl et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5541510 | Danielson | Jul 1996 | A |
5559428 | Li et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5605760 | Roberts | Feb 1997 | A |
5609511 | Moriyama et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5640242 | O'Boyle et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644221 | Li et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5658183 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5660672 | Li et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5663797 | Sandhu | Sep 1997 | A |
5672091 | Takahashi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
RE35703 | Koch et al. | Dec 1997 | E |
5708506 | Birang | Jan 1998 | A |
5719495 | Moslehi | Feb 1998 | A |
5730642 | Sandhu et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5731697 | Li et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733171 | Allen et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5762537 | Sandhu et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5791969 | Lund | Aug 1998 | A |
5807165 | Uzoh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5838447 | Hiyama et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5851135 | Sandhu et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5865666 | Nagahara | Feb 1999 | A |
5872633 | Holzapfel et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5889401 | Jourdain et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5893796 | Birang et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899792 | Yagi | May 1999 | A |
5911619 | Uzoh et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913713 | Cheek et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5929994 | Lee et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5948203 | Wang | Sep 1999 | A |
5949927 | Tang | Sep 1999 | A |
5964643 | Birang et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6004187 | Nyui et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6034781 | Sarfaty et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6068539 | Bajaj et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071178 | Baker, III | Jun 2000 | A |
6120348 | Fujita et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6159073 | Wiswesser et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6179709 | Redeker et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6190234 | Swedek et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6254459 | Bajaj et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6280289 | Wiswesser et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6296548 | Wiswesser et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309276 | Tsai et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6407546 | Le et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6431949 | Ishikawa et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433541 | Lehman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6448795 | Ermakov et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6458014 | Ishikawa et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6558229 | Kimura et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6563308 | Nagano et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575825 | Tolles et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6586337 | Parikh | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6621264 | Lehman et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6663469 | Kimura et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6707540 | Lehman et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6878038 | Johansson et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6921466 | Hongo et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
20010008827 | Kimura et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020002029 | Kimura et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020013124 | Tsujimura et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020077031 | Johansson et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020098777 | Laursen et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020164925 | Swedek et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 460 348 | Dec 1991 | EP |
0 663 265 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0 640 438 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0 738 561 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0 881 040 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 881 484 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0 402 527 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 116 552 | Jul 2001 | EP |
1-136009 | May 1989 | JP |
3-295409 | Dec 1991 | JP |
7-091948 | Apr 1995 | JP |
0146684 | Jun 2001 | WO |
0189765 | Nov 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09812329 | Mar 2001 | US |
Child | 10619171 | US |