The present invention relates to methods and systems for interconnecting SS7 signaling points (SPs). More particularly, the present invention relates to an edge device and a method for interconnecting SS7 SPs using the edge device.
Conventional telecommunications networks typically comprise two distinct communication pathways or sub-networks—a voice network and a signaling network. These two networks function cooperatively to facilitate calls between users. The voice network is responsible for the transmission of voice (or user data) while the signaling network has a number of responsibilities. These include call setup, call teardown, and database access features.
In simple terms, the signaling network facilitates the dynamic linking together of discrete voice-type communication circuits so that a voice-type connection can be established between two parties. These functions are referred to as call setup and call teardown. The signaling network also provides a framework through which non-voice related information can be transported. This data and transport functionality, however, is transparent to the users. This signaling technique is often referred to as out-of-band signaling where the term “band” indicates the voice band. Examples of non-voice data transport include 800 number database access, calling card verification services, and caller ID services.
In order to ensure consistent and reliable communication across the signaling network infrastructure, a common or standard digital signaling protocol was established by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) in the mid 1960's. This protocol was known as Signaling System 6 (SS6) and has since evolved into the slightly more sophisticated SS7 currently in use.
As a protocol, SS7 defines the hierarchy or structure of the information contained within a message or data packet. This internal data structure is often referred to as the protocol stack, which is comprised of a number of well defined strata or layers. In general terms, the SS7 protocol stack consists of 4 levels or layers: the physical layer, the data link layer, the network layer, and the user part layer. It will be appreciated that communication networks operating outside of the United States often refer to the SS7 protocol and network as Common Channel Signaling #7 (CCS#7). For simplicity, the term SS7 is used herein. However, it is understood that embodiments of the present invention can be used equally in CCS7 or SS7 networks.
An SS7 network includes a plurality of SS7 nodes, commonly referred to as signaling points (SPs), which include service switching points (SSPs), signal transfer points (STPs) and service control points (SCPs).
An SSP is typically installed in tandem or Class 5 offices and is capable of handling both in-band signaling and SS7 signaling. An SSP might be a customer switch, an end-office, an access tandem and/or a tandem.
An STP transfers signaling messages from one signaling link to another. STPs are packet switches and are generally installed as mated pairs, each mate of the pair being located remotely from the other to ensure redundancy and reliability in the event one is damaged, for example by a natural disaster, as well as load sharing. Thus, for example, one STP of the pair might be located in North Carolina while the other of the pair is located in Illinois, each one typically operating nominally at no more than 40% of its maximum processing capacity.
Finally, SCPs control access to databases such as 800 number translation, 800 number carrier identification, credit card verification and the like. SCPs may include a front-end computer that received database queries from SS7 SPs and provides responses to the queries.
Each of the SP's above is interconnected using SS7 signaling links. Signaling links are transmission facilities used to connect SPs together. Conventional SS7 signaling links are dedicated, bidirectional facilities operating at a fixed-bandwidth, for example 56 kbps in the United States and Canada, and 64 kbps when clear channel capability is required. Every link will typically have a mate for redundancy and enhanced network integrity.
Dedicated SS7 links that connect an STP to other SPs within an SS7 network can be capital intensive and expensive to maintain. Moreover, because redundant SS7 data links are typically used, their maintenance adds to the capital intensity and expense.
These expenses create a formidable barrier to further expansion of wired telephone networks as well as cellular telephone networks. Consider, for example, a telecommunications carrier or service provider that desires to enter a market and provide telephone service to customers. The provider must be connected to both the signaling and voice networks.
With regard to the signaling network, the necessary connectivity involves establishing at least one communication link between an end office, or SSP, and a pair of STPs. This task can be accomplished through the use of an intermediate, non-intelligent multiplexing node; that is, the node cannot discriminate information, but merely passes it. Such multiplexing nodes concentrate information onto and distribute information off of the SS7 physical link(s).
Accordingly, in order for an SSP to connect to the signaling network, dedicated physical SS7 links (expensive communication grade cables) must be run between the associated multiplexer and each remotely located STP. The new or expanding provider can either install new cables, or lease a predetermined, fixed-bandwidth on existing lines from a network service provider. Moreover, the provider must lease the maximum bandwidth which would otherwise be required during peak calling periods, regardless of how small the bandwidth needed during normal calling periods.
Similarly, when a cellular service provider enters a new geographic area or market, the cellular service provider must connect the elements of the cellular radiotelephone network to the wired telephone network using SS7 links.
In any case, such dedicated SS7 links are typically very expensive, whether installing or leasing, and can represent a recurring cost of as much as $10,000 per month. Such high costs present a problem for existing carriers and service providers, as well as for new carriers and service providers looking to enter the marketplace. The large number of SS7 links that must be provided can thus increase the expansion or introduction costs for wired and wireless networks, thereby increasing consumer cost and/or reducing consumer access to competitive service providers.
One scenario in which providing dedicated, fixed-bandwidth SS7 links is particularly inefficient is connecting telephone end offices in sparsely-populated areas to an STP. For example, referring to
Even though SSPs 100, 102, and 104 use only a fraction of the bandwidth provided by access links 108, 110, and 112, the owners of SSPs 100, 102, and 104 are required to pay for the full amount of bandwidth provided by access links 108, 110, and 112. Hence, providing SS7 signaling services to end offices in sparsely populated areas is not cost effective using conventional fixed-bandwidth SS7 links. The cost is further increased if the fixed-bandwidth links span long geographic distances.
Another configuration in which using conventional fixed-bandwidth SS7 links is inefficient is in mesh networks used to connect end offices. Referring to
Accordingly, there exists a need for novel methods and systems for interconnecting SS7 SPs that reduces the number of fixed-bandwidth SS7 links.
The present invention includes an edge device and a method for interconnecting SS7 SPs using an edge device. As used herein, the term edge device refers to a switching node that reduces the need for providing fixed-bandwidth signaling links over long geographic distances to interconnect SS7 SPs. The reason that the device is referred to as an edge device is that it is particularly well suited for use at the edge of a physical network, such as at a group of SSPs located remotely from an STP. However, as will be described in more detail below, the edge device according to the present invention is not limited to use at the edge of a network. The edge device according to the present invention can be used to interconnect SS7 SPs in a variety of configurations, including mesh networks, that are not necessarily located at the edge of a physical network.
According to one aspect of the invention, a plurality of SS7 signaling points are connected to an edge device using fixed-bandwidth SS7 signaling links. The edge device is connected to an SS7/IP gateway using a variable-bandwidth signaling link. The edge device multiplexes messages sent over the fixed-bandwidth signaling links and sends the multiplexed messages to the SS7/IP gateway over the variable-bandwidth signaling link.
According to another aspect, the present invention includes a method for replacing inter-SSP fixed-bandwidth connections in a mesh network with variable-bandwidth signaling links. In a mesh network, first and second SPs are connected to a first edge device using fixed-bandwidth SS7 signaling links. Third and fourth SPs are connected to a second edge device using third and fourth fixed-bandwidth SS7 signaling links. The first edge device is connected to the second edge device using a variable-bandwidth signaling link.
According to yet another aspect, the present invention includes an edge device having simplified message transfer part (MTP) routing functionality. In such an edge device, if an incoming SS7 message is directed to an SS7 node directly connected to the edge device, the message is routed to that node. Otherwise, the message is routed to an SS7/IP gateway. Alternatively, the edge device may be configured to route all messages over the variable-bandwidth signaling link, even further simplifying the MTP routing.
Embodiments of the present invention will be explained below in terms of modules or processes. It is understood that these modules or processes may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. Accordingly, embodiments of the invention may be implemented as computer program products comprising computer-executable instructions embodied in a computer-readable medium for performing steps. These embodiments may also include appropriate hardware programmed to execute the instructions and perform the steps. Exemplary hardware suitable for use with embodiments of the present invention includes a microprocessor, such as a Pentium processor available from Intel Corporation.
Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide an edge device that reduces the number of fixed-bandwidth SS7 signaling links in a telecommunications signaling network.
It is yet another object of the invention to provide a method for interconnecting SS7 SPs using an edge device.
These and other objects of the present invention are achieved, in whole or in part, by the present invention. Having stated some of the objects of the invention hereinabove, other objects will become evident as the description proceeds when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings as best described hereinbelow.
The present invention will now be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings of which:
a) is a block diagram of a preferred packet format usable by an edge device for encapsulating a TCAP message according to an embodiment of the present invention;
b) and 5(c) are block diagrams of a preferred packet format usable by an edge device for encapsulating ISUP messages according to embodiments of the present invention;
a) illustrates an MTP routing table usable by an edge device for internally routing messages according to an embodiment of the present invention;
b) is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary MTP routing algorithm according to an embodiment of the present invention;
As stated above, interconnecting SS7 SPs using fixed-bandwidth SS7 signaling links can be inefficient and cost-prohibitive, especially when bandwidth is under-utilized or when multiple links spanning long geographic distances are required. Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention include methods and systems for interconnecting SS7 SPs using an edge device located proximally to at least some of the SPs. The edge device connects the SPs to other distant SPs using variable-bandwidth links, such as transmission control protocol/internet protocol (TCP/IP) links or user datagram protocol/internet protocol (UDP/IP) links. The bandwidth available to a given TCP/IP link or a UDP/IP link varies as a function of network usage by other nodes. Thus, nodes in a TCP/IP or UDP/IP network share network bandwidth with other nodes. As a result, the cost of connecting SS7 network elements using TCP/IP or UDP/IP signaling links is less expensive than using dedicated, fixed-bandwidth SS7 links. In addition, in a variable-bandwidth environment, such as TCP/IP, bandwidth not in use by one node will automatically be utilized by another node.
Edge device 306 is connected to SS7/IP gateway 314 using variable-bandwidth signaling link 316. In a preferred embodiment, variable-bandwidth signaling link 316 comprises an IP link, such as a TCP/IP signaling link or a UDP/IP signaling link. Using a variable-bandwidth signaling link to connect SSPs 300, 302, and 304 to SS7/IP gateway 314 greatly reduces the cost of connecting SSPs 300, 302, and 304 to the signaling network. The owners of SSPs 300, 302, and 304 are no longer required to purchase fixed units of bandwidth, such as 56 kbps, to connect to SS7/IP gateway 314. Instead, the owners of SSPs 300, 302, and 304 can share bandwidth and costs of variable-bandwidth signaling link 316.
Edge device 306 may or may not have an SS7 point code. In an embodiment in which edge device 306 does not have a point code, messages from SSPs 300, 302, and 304 may be addressed to a point code of SS7/IP gateway 314 or other connected node.
SS7/IP gateway 314 may include SS7 switching functionality similar to that of a conventional signal transfer point. In addition, SS7/IP gateway may also include functionality for processing IP-encapsulated SS7 messages and for encapsulating SS7 messages in IP datagrams. An SS7/IP gateway suitable for use with embodiments of the present invention is the IP7 Secure Gateway™ available from Tekelec, Inc. of Calabasas, Calif.
LIMs 400 and 402 each include hardware, such as a microprocessor and associated memory, for executing and storing programs for processing SS7 messages. In the illustrated embodiment, LIMs 400 and 402 each include SS7 level 2 processes for performing SS7 level 2 functions on incoming and outgoing SS7 messages. For example, SS7 level 2 process 412 ensures that Level 3 data is transmitted and received on the links without any errors. It also ensures that messages are received in the same order it was sent.
MTP level 3 processes 414 and 416 each include message discrimination functions 418, message distribution functions 420, and MTP routing functions 422. Message discrimination functions 418 receive incoming SS7 messages from the layer 2 processes and determine whether the messages can be routed solely based on the MTP routing label in the messages or whether global title translation is required. If message discrimination functions 418 determine that messages can be routed based on MTP routing labels, message discrimination functions 418 pass the messages to MTP routing functions 422. MTP routing functions 422 read the destination point code in the message and transmit the message to the appropriate LIM or DCM address assigned to that point code. Edge device 306 may be configured to route all non-local messages to SS7/IP gateway 314 illustrated in
If discrimination function 418 determines that global title translation is required, discrimination function 418 passes the message to distribution function 420. Distribution function 420 routes the message to ASM 405 for global title translation. ASM includes hardware, such as a microprocessor and associated memory, for executing and storing programs for performing global title translation for SS7 messages. In the illustrated embodiment, ASM 405 includes SCCP routing control (SCRC) process 424 for performing global title translation on incoming messages using global title translation database 426. The result of global title translation is a new destination point code for the message. Once global title translation is performed, and the new destination point code is inserted in the message, the message is passed to MTP routing function 428, which routes the message to the appropriate LIM or DCM address based on the newly-inserted destination point code. SCCP management function 427 manages global title translation data in GTT database 426.
DCM 404 includes hardware, such as a microprocessor and associated memory, for executing and storing programs for converting messages from SS7 format to TCP/IP format, and vice versa. DCM 404, like LIMs 400 and 402 includes SS7 layer 3 functions 430. SS7 layer 3 functions 430 include MTP routing function 432, discrimination function 434, and distribution function 436. The SS7 layer 3 functions 430 are the same as those described with respect to LIMs 400 and 402. Hence, a description thereof is not repeated herein.
Unlike LIMs 400 and 402, DCM 404 includes SS7/IP converter 438 that sends and receives IP-encapsulated SS7 messages over variable-bandwidth length 316. For incoming IP-encapsulated SS7 messages, SS7/IP converter 438 strips the IP header and the TCP or UDP header from the message. SS7/IP converter 438 then passes the SS7 message contained in the data portion of the IP packet to SS7 layer 3 process 430. For outgoing messages, SS7/IP converter 438 receives SS7 messages from LIMs 400 and 402 and ASM 405, strips at least a portion of the MTP layers 1 and 2 information from the SS7 messages, adds TCP and IP headers to the messages. Alternatively, SS7/IP converter 438 may encapsulate the entire SS7 message in an IP datagram. Whether or not the entire message or a portion of the message is encapsulated depends on the SS7 message type. For example, if the SS7 message is an ISDN user part (ISUP) message, it may be desirable to retain the SS7 layer 2 information in the packet. Alternatively, if the SS7 message is a TCAP message, it may be desirable to strip the SS7 layer 2 information from the message.
a)-5(c) illustrate preferred packet formats for encapsulating TCAP and ISUP messages in TCP/IP packets.
A portion of SS7 MSU 500 is encapsulated in transport adapter layer interface (TALI) packet 518. In particular, for an incoming SS7 MSU, MTP layer 2 information 510, opening and closing flags 512 and 514, and frame check sequence 516 are discarded. The destination point code from MTP routing label 506 is placed into the called party address field of SCCP layer 504. The calling party address field is created if it does not exist and then filled. The OPC from routing label 506 is placed into the calling party address field of SCCP layer 504 if there is no calling party point code. The modified SCCP layer 504 and TCAP layer 502 are then placed in service field 520 of TALI packet 518. TALI packet 518 includes a header 522 including a length field 524, and opcode field 526 and a sync field 528. Length field 524 indicates the length of service field 520 of TALI field 518. Opcode field 526 specifies the payload type, which is TCAP. Sync field 528 is used for synchronization.
TALI packet 518 is encapsulated in data portion 530 of IP packet 532. IP packet 532 includes TCP header 534, IP header 536, and MAC header 538.
b) illustrates a preferred packet format for encapsulating SS7 user part messages in Internet protocol packets according to an embodiment of the present invention. In
TALI packet 518A, in addition to the SS7 layer 3 information, includes length field 524, opcode field 526, and sync field 528. Length field 524 specifies the length of the data in service field 520 of TALI packet 518A. Opcode field 526 specifies an SS7 message type. In this example, the opcode field would specify an SS7 user part message type such as ISUP, TUP, or BISUP. Sync field 528 indicates the start of a packet. Sync field 528 is useful in determining packet boundaries in TCP streams if the value in the length field 524 is incorrect.
TALI packet 518A is encapsulated in data field 530 of IP packet 532A. TCP header field 534 includes TCP header information, such as TCP port numbers, for bidirectional user part message communication. IP header field 536 includes IP header information such as source and destination IP addresses, for TCP/IP segment 532A. Finally, MAC header field 538 includes physical and network information for delivering the IP packet 532A over a physical network.
c) illustrates an alternative data structure for encapsulating an SS7 user part message in an IP packet according to an embodiment of the present invention. The data structure illustrated in
IP packet 532B includes data field 530 that includes TALI packet 518B. Data field 530 thus includes application-level sequence number field 540. The remaining fields in IP packet 532B are the same as those illustrated in
Referring back to
a) illustrates a simplified edge device MTP routing table according to an embodiment of the present invention. In
If an incoming message is directed to any point code other than one of the point codes of the locally-connected SSPs, the message is directed to DCM 404. Accordingly, routing table 600 includes a default entry for DCM 404. When DCM 404 receives a message, it automatically encapsulates the message in a TCP datagram, which is in turn encapsulated in an IP datagram, as described above. The destination IP address in the IP header will be 100.100.101, the IP address of SS7/IP gateway 314. After encapsulating the SS7 message in the IP datagram, edge device 306 sends the message over variable-bandwidth link 316. Because edge device 306 includes a simplified routing table with a default entry corresponding to the variable-bandwidth link, MTP message routing functions included in edge device 306 are greatly simplified over a conventional STP. As a result, the MTP routing time is shorter than that of a conventional STP.
b) illustrates an exemplary MTP routing algorithm performed by MTP routing functions 420, 422, 428, and 432 of edge device 306 illustrated in
The MTP routing time in edge device 306 can be further simplified if local routing functionality is disabled. For example, it may be desirable to have a single-entry routing table in which all messages directed to all point codes are routed to SS7/IP gateway 314 illustrated in
Another feature/advantage of edge device 306 according to the present embodiment is that the edge device is capable of filtering certain SS7 messages received over the fixed-bandwidth signaling links so that these messages are not transmitted over variable-bandwidth signaling link 316. For example, referring again to
FISUs are transmitted between SS7 signaling points (SPs) during idle periods to monitor link status before a transmission occurs. LSSUs are transmitted between SS7 SPs to verify the status of the link on which the LSSUs are carried. MSUs carry higher protocol types, such as ISUP, TCAP, and mobile application part (MAP).
Since LSSUs and FISUs consume link bandwidth and may only be of interest to SS7 signaling points connected via SS7 signaling links, it may be desirable to filter LSSUs and FISUs from the SS7 messages that are encapsulated IP datagrams and forwarded over variable bandwidth signaling link 316. Since MSUs contain information that may be used by gateway 314 and other nodes in performing call signaling and database functions, it may be desirable to pass MSUs to gateway 314. Accordingly, edge device 306 may be adapted to filter LSSUs and FISUs incoming on signaling links 308, 310, and 312 and pass MSUs in the incoming SS7 messages to gateway 314. Such filtering may be performed by the LIM that receives the messages or the DCM that sends the messages out over variable-bandwidth signaling link 316. By filtering LSSUs and FISUs incoming on the fixed-bandwidth signaling links, edge device 306 utilizes less bandwidth on variable bandwidth signaling link 316. This allows more MSUs to be sent over variable bandwidth signaling link 316.
If it is desirable to add another SSP to the mesh network, only a single additional fixed-bandwidth SS7 signaling link is required to connect additional SSP to one of the edge devices 708 and 710. If the edge device has sufficient link interface module cards, there is no need to even upgrade the hardware of the edge device. Alternatively, if the edge device requires a new link interface module, such a module can be easily installed simply by plugging a link interface module into the IMT bus illustrated in
It will also be appreciated that in the event that any of the SSPs connected to edge device 708, such as SSP 700 fails, edge device 708 will send an IP message to the edge device 710 instructing edge device 710 to stop any traffic destined to SSP 700. If the link 718 is congested, edge device 708 will buffer the received traffic as much as possible. If the link remains congested for an extended period of time, resulting in the buffer being full at edge device 708, it will send an IP message to the edge device 710 indicating to throttle the traffic destined to SSP 700.
Accordingly, another embodiment of the invention includes monitoring the status of SS7 nodes connected to an edge device via fixed-bandwidth SS7 signaling links. Such monitoring may be performed using conventional SS7 mechanisms, such as examining FISUs and LSSUs on the fixed-bandwidth signaling link. In response to determining that a link is either down or congested, edge device 708 may instruct the node sending data to that link that the link is congested or down. If the link is congested, edge device 708 may buffer data and instruct the sending node to slow the flow of incoming IP-encapsulated SS7 messages. If the link is down, edge device 708 may instruct the sending node to stop sending messages to that link. The messages to stop or slow the flow of messages to a down or congested link may be sent over variable-bandwidth signaling link 720.
The sending of link-congested and link-down messages from an edge device to a sending node is not limited to communication between edge devices, as illustrated in
Each of the edge devices 808, 810, 812, and 814 may be similar in hardware and software structure to edge device 306 illustrated in
As discussed above with respect to
In the drawings and specification, there have been disclosed typical preferred embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms are employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention being set forth in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/541,853, filed Apr. 3, 2000 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,940,866, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/205,809 filed Dec. 4, 1998 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,324,183, a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/443,712, filed Nov. 19, 1999 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,050,456, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/127,889 filed Apr. 5, 1999, the disclosures of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5008929 | Olsen et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5142622 | Owens | Aug 1992 | A |
5173897 | Schrodi et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5208811 | Kashio et al. | May 1993 | A |
5239542 | Breidenstein et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5315641 | Montgomery et al. | May 1994 | A |
5384840 | Blatchford et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5420916 | Sekiguchi | May 1995 | A |
5430727 | Callon | Jul 1995 | A |
5477531 | McKee et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5509010 | La Porta et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5568487 | Sitbon et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5581558 | Horney, II et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583926 | Venier et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583927 | Fly et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586177 | Farris et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592530 | Brockman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5610910 | Focsaneanu et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5612949 | Bennett | Mar 1997 | A |
5638431 | Everett et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640446 | Everett et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5650998 | Angenot et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5651002 | Van Seters et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657452 | Kralowetz et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5661790 | Hsu | Aug 1997 | A |
5664102 | Faynberg | Sep 1997 | A |
5675635 | Vos et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680437 | Segal | Oct 1997 | A |
5680552 | Netravali et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5694463 | Christie et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701301 | Weisser, Jr. | Dec 1997 | A |
5706286 | Reiman et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5712903 | Bartholomew et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5732213 | Gessel et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740374 | Raffali-Schreinemachers | Apr 1998 | A |
5754752 | Sheh et al. | May 1998 | A |
5761281 | Baum et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761290 | Farris et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5761500 | Gallant et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764750 | Chau et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764955 | Doolan | Jun 1998 | A |
5768361 | Cowgill | Jun 1998 | A |
5768525 | Kralowetz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774695 | Autrey et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5781534 | Perlman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5787255 | Parlan et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5793425 | Balakrishnan | Aug 1998 | A |
5793771 | Darland et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802285 | Hirviniemi | Sep 1998 | A |
5805587 | Norris et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809028 | Nethercott et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812669 | Jenkins et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812781 | Fahlman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815669 | Lee et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828844 | Civanlar et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838782 | Lindquist | Nov 1998 | A |
5852660 | Lindquist et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5867495 | Elliott et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870565 | Glitho | Feb 1999 | A |
5872782 | Dendi | Feb 1999 | A |
5878129 | Figurski et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5889954 | Gessell et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892822 | Gottlieb et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898667 | Longfield et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5905724 | Carson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5912887 | Sehgal | Jun 1999 | A |
5917900 | Allison et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920562 | Christie et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923659 | Curry et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926482 | Christie et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933490 | White et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940598 | Strauss et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949871 | Kabay et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5958016 | Chang et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5966431 | Reiman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971900 | Miller | Oct 1999 | A |
5974052 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5991301 | Christie | Nov 1999 | A |
5995608 | Detampel, Jr. et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002754 | Jaiswal et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006098 | Rathnasabapathy et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011780 | Vaman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6011794 | Mordowitz et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6011803 | Bicknell et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014379 | White et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018515 | Sorber | Jan 2000 | A |
6021126 | White et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023502 | Bouanaka et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026091 | Christie et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6028921 | Malik et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6035020 | Weinstein et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6047005 | Sherman | Apr 2000 | A |
6055202 | Merritt | Apr 2000 | A |
6055302 | Schmersel et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061364 | Hager et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064653 | Farris | May 2000 | A |
6067546 | Lund | May 2000 | A |
6069890 | White et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075783 | Voit | Jun 2000 | A |
6078582 | Curry et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6079036 | Moharram | Jun 2000 | A |
6081589 | Jiang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6084892 | Benash et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6084956 | Turner et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094437 | Loehndorf, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097036 | Teshima et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097719 | Benash et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6097805 | Figurski et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111780 | Bertin | Aug 2000 | A |
6111870 | Kurtz | Aug 2000 | A |
6111893 | Volftsune et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112090 | Valentine | Aug 2000 | A |
6115383 | Bell et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6118779 | Madonna | Sep 2000 | A |
6118780 | Dunn et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6119160 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122255 | Bartholomew et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122263 | Dahlin et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122363 | Friedlander et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122365 | Yegoshin | Sep 2000 | A |
6125111 | Snow et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125177 | Whittaker | Sep 2000 | A |
H1880 | Vines et al. | Oct 2000 | H |
H1896 | Hoffpauir et al. | Oct 2000 | H |
6128379 | Smyk | Oct 2000 | A |
6134235 | Goldman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134246 | Cai et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137869 | Voit et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137874 | Brown et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6138110 | Jahn et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144667 | Doshi et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6144670 | Sponaugle et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6147999 | Honda et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151390 | Volftsun et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154445 | Farris et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154467 | Hager et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157710 | Figurski et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167025 | Hsing et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6178181 | Glitho | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189031 | Badger et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6192051 | Lipman et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6195425 | Farris | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6201804 | Kikinis | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208642 | Balachandran et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6215783 | Neyman | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6236722 | Gilbert et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6278697 | Brody et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6285754 | Sun et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6292479 | Bartholomew et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6307926 | Barton et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311186 | MeLampy et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324173 | Deschaine et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324183 | Miller et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327258 | Deschaine et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327267 | Valentine et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327350 | Spangler et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330250 | Curry et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330614 | Aggarwal et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333931 | LaPier et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335937 | Chao et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6349099 | Larikka et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6366655 | Book et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377799 | Hameleers et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385301 | Nolting et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393022 | Hewett et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393581 | Friedman et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6411604 | Brockman et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411632 | Lindgren et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6415027 | Malik | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425009 | Parrish et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430189 | Juntumaa et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442169 | Lewis | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6459783 | March et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6483837 | Howell et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483842 | Mauger | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487286 | Reaves et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6496512 | Medhat | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6504923 | Swale | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507649 | Tovander | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515985 | Shmulevich et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6515997 | Feltner et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522667 | Oda et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533427 | Chang | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535599 | Torrey et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6529524 | Liao et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6542497 | Curry et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546003 | Farris | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563835 | Chen | May 2003 | B1 |
6574216 | Farris et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577626 | Christie et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584190 | Bressler | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6594246 | Jorgensen | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594258 | Larson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611532 | Madour et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611533 | Liao et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6625170 | Curry et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6631133 | Christie et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636504 | Albers et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6668051 | Ashdown et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6674748 | Dykhuizen et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6678242 | Simon | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6680953 | Kim | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681009 | Graf et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6683881 | Mijares et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6731741 | Fourcand et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6760343 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6782004 | Brusilovsky et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6912590 | Lundbäck et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6940866 | Miller et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6944184 | Miller et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6954526 | Glenn et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6965592 | Tinsley et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6967956 | Tinsley et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6987781 | Miller et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6990089 | Benedyk et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7002988 | Benedyk et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7031340 | Sprague et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7046667 | Sprague et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7050456 | Sprague et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7113581 | Benedyk et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7190702 | Sprague et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7242695 | Sprague et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7318091 | Brendes et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7327670 | Sprague et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
20010029182 | McCann et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010046227 | Matsuhira et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010046234 | Agrawal et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010049730 | Brendes et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20010055380 | Benedyk et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020048360 | Zambre et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020105969 | Benedyk et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020131400 | Tinsley et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020150221 | Carson et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20050265341 | Benedyk et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050286502 | Benedyk et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060013203 | Benedyk et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060013204 | Benedyk et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060077978 | Sprague et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080075068 | Brendes et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080075115 | Brendes et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2239764 | Dec 1998 | CA |
0 853 411 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1 014 735 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1 054 568 | May 2000 | EP |
1 026 861 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1 089 575 | Sep 2000 | EP |
1 161 819 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1 177 660 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1 135 905 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1 169 829 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1 169 816 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1 192 758 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1 755 295 | Feb 2007 | EP |
1 715 658 | Oct 2007 | EP |
1 371 246 | Jul 2008 | EP |
WO9711563 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9733441 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 9742774 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9742776 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9746045 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9828879 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9828885 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9828897 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9909759 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO 9916256 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 0056032 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0019758 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO 0022840 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0030369 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0031933 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0033519 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0035155 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0035156 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 0054476 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO 0060812 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0060814 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0060821 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0065785 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO 0076134 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0111825 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0124499 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 0137532 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0182635 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 0193526 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0207455 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO 02056618 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 02060192 | Aug 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050238036 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60127889 | Apr 1999 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09541853 | Apr 2000 | US |
Child | 11130422 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09205809 | Dec 1998 | US |
Child | 09541853 | US | |
Parent | 09443712 | Nov 1999 | US |
Child | 09205809 | US |