Switching power converters can generate unwanted electromagnetic interference (EMI) due to fast transitions at their switching nodes. The switching transitions can be slowed, for example, using a resistor current ballast. However, such solutions can result in non-linear switching edges that are not predictable or controllable.
This document relates generally to apparatus and methods for an edge rate driver for a power converter switch. In an example, the driver can include an input node configured to receive a pulse width modulated signal, a first switch configured to couple a control node of the power converter switch to a supply voltage during a first state, a second switch configured to couple the control node of the power converter switch to a reference voltage during a second state, and a first current source configured to supply charge current to the first switch when the power converter switch transitions from the second state to the first state, the charge current configured to charge a parasitic capacitance of the power converter switch.
This section is intended to provide an overview of subject matter of the present patent application. It is not intended to provide an exclusive or exhaustive explanation of the invention. The detailed description is included to provide further information about the present patent application.
In the drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, like numerals may describe similar components in different views. Like numerals having different letter suffixes may represent different instances of similar components. The drawings illustrate generally, by way of example, but not by way of limitation, various embodiments discussed in the present document.
The present inventors have recognized a system to reduce EMI by slowing the switching node transitions of a converter power switch in a controlled, yet efficient manner. In an example, a constant current gate driver can control the charging of gate-to-drain capacitance of the power switch. Such gate to drain capacitance can be a parasitic capacitance or an explicit capacitor of the converter power switch. Such capacitance can be a dominant parameter when controlling a power MOSFET, such as one employed in a switching power converter. In an example, rise and fall times of a power MOSFET switching node can become a function of the charging current. In certain examples, increased efficiency can be realized using switched current sources that consume little if any power outside of the intervals for transitions of a switched node state, for example between a first high logic level state and a second low logic level state.
In certain examples, a power converter can include a current source gate driver that can control the charging of capacitance of a power converter switch, such as parasitic capacitance of the power converter switch. Such parasitic capacitance can determine rise and fall times of switching nodes of the power converter. In an example, the current source gate driver can slow switch node transitions in a controlled and efficient manner. For example, the gate drive according to the present subject matter can reduce static bias current compared to similarly sized existing switching converters. In certain examples, feedback can be applied to improve speed and reliability of the power converter.
In an example, the first driver switch 209 can be coupled to a first logic level supply Vdd and the second driver switch 210 can be coupled to a second logic level supply Vcc. The first and second driver switches 209, 210 can be coupled to each other and a driver output 211. The driver output 211 can be coupled to a control node 212 of the power switch 202, such as a gate node of a power transistor. The power switch 202 can include a capacitance 213. The capacitance 213 can be associated with the structure of the power switch 202 or can include one or more capacitors associated with the power switch circuit.
The ERC gate driver 201 can include a first switched current source 214, and a second switched current source 215. In an example, each of the first switched current source 214 and the second switched current source 215 can include a current mirror. Each current mirror can include a current sense transistor 216, 217 and a current mirror transistor 218, 219. Each current mirror can detect a sensed current IC flowing through the sense transistor 216, 217 to provide a controlled mirrored current IA, IB to charge and discharge the power switch capacitance 213.
In an example, the sensed current IC for the first and second current mirrors can be set independently. In an example, a third current source 220 that can control the sensed current IC. In an example, each current mirror can provide a scaled representation of the sensed current IC as the mirror current IA, IB, such that the sense current IC is substantially smaller than the mirror current IA, IB.
In an example, the third current source 220 can include a controller. The controller can receive the input signal and can independently switch the first and second switched current sources 214, 215. In certain examples, the third current source 220 can be adjustable to allow individual or dynamic adjustment of an edge rate of a signal at the output 205. In certain examples, a controlled current can provide a smoother transition between the first state of the power switch 202 and the second state of the power switch 202. In certain examples, controlled ramping between power switch states can provide fast switching with reduced and bandwidth limited EMI.
In an example, a falling transition of the PWM signal at t5 can cause current IA to begin charging the capacitance 213 of the power switch 202, thus, pulling the control node Vg 212 toward the first supply voltage Vdd until it sinks current substantially equal to IA+IL at t6. With the current balanced, the voltage at the control node Vg 212 can remain nearly constant and the voltage at the switched note Vgs of the power switch 202 can begin falling in a substantially linearly fashion. At t7, the voltage at the switched note Vgs of the power switch 202 can reach approximately the second supply voltage Vcc, and the control node Vg 212 can continue to charge until reaching the first supply voltage Vdd at t8. In an example, the second supply voltage Vcc can be ground.
In certain examples, the feedback circuit 533 can include a reference capacitor 534, an error amplifier 535, secondary driver switches 536, 537, secondary current sources 538, 539, and an inverter 540. The feedback circuit 533 can receive a command signal indicative of a desired transition ramp of the boost converter output 505. In certain examples, the command signal can be generated across the reference capacitor 534 coupled to a junction Vg between the first and second driver switches 509, 510. The error amplifier 535 can control the secondary current sources 538, 539 using an error signal derived from the command signal and a feedback signal indicative of the switch output Vgs of the power switch 502. In certain examples, the feedback circuit 533 can introduce an inversion, and thus, the inverter 540 can provide the proper control signal for the secondary driver switches 536, 537. In certain examples, the feedback circuit 533 can allow faster transitions of the switched output Vgs of the power switch 502. In certain examples, the transition rate can be adjusted by selecting a different reference capacitor size. In certain examples, the closed loop nature of the feedback circuit 533 can provide a more linear transition of the switched output Vgs of the power switch 502 over open loop edge rate control. The more controlled edge rates can provide more predictable and bandwidth limited EMI, even for faster transitions and, in turn, can provide opportunities for more efficient and precise handling of the EMI. In addition, the more controlled transitions can provide a more efficient boost converter 500.
The above detailed description includes references to the accompanying drawings, which form a part of the detailed description. The drawings show, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention can be practiced. These embodiments are also referred to herein as “examples.” All publications, patents, and patent documents referred to in this document are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety, as though individually incorporated by reference. In the event of inconsistent usages between this document and those documents so incorporated by reference, the usage in the incorporated reference(s) should be considered supplementary to that of this document; for irreconcilable inconsistencies, the usage in this document controls.
In this document, the terms “a” or “an” are used, as is common in patent documents, to include one or more than one, independent of any other instances or usages of “at least one” or “one or more.” In this document, the term “or” is used to refer to a nonexclusive or, such that “A or B” includes “A but not B,” “B but not A,” and “A and B,” unless otherwise indicated. In the appended claims, the terms “including” and “in which” are used as the plain-English equivalents of the respective terms “comprising” and “wherein.” Also, in the following claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are open-ended, that is, a system, device, article, or process that includes elements in addition to those listed after such a term in a claim are still deemed to fall within the scope of that claim. Moreover, in the following claims, the terms “first,” “second,” and “third,” etc. are used merely as labels, and are not intended to impose numerical requirements on their objects.
The above description is intended to be illustrative, and not restrictive. For example, although the examples above have been described relating to PNP devices, one or more examples can be applicable to NPN devices. In other examples, the above-described examples (or one or more aspects thereof) may be used in combination with each other. Other embodiments can be used, such as by one of ordinary skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. The Abstract is provided to comply with 37 C.F.R. §1.72(b), to allow the reader to quickly ascertain the nature of the technical disclosure. It is submitted with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. Also, in the above Detailed Description, various features may be grouped together to streamline the disclosure. This should not be interpreted as intending that an unclaimed disclosed feature is essential to any claim. Rather, inventive subject matter may lie in less than all features of a particular disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment. The scope of the invention should be determined with reference to the appended claims, along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled.
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/294,558, filed on Nov. 11, 2011, and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,860,398 on Oct. 14, 2014, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/441,731, filed on Feb. 11, 2011, the benefit of priority of each of which is claimed hereby, and each of which are incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4791326 | Vajdic et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
5450019 | McClure et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5742193 | Colli | Apr 1998 | A |
5828245 | Brambilla | Oct 1998 | A |
6166526 | Greitschus | Dec 2000 | A |
6194935 | Pioppo | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6271699 | Dowlatabadi | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6373296 | Auer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6998733 | Kabayama et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7262650 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7332935 | Illegems et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7521970 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
8134388 | Cortigiani et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8860398 | Mulligan et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20020063586 | Kiehl | May 2002 | A1 |
20050024090 | Terletzki et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050122146 | Lin | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20070040542 | Cortigiani et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070210838 | Gupta et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20100264957 | Tamaoka | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110068832 | Chen et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110115541 | Barrow et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110285378 | Tamaoka | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110291733 | Yano | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120043905 | Christensen et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120153909 | Bucossi | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120206123 | Mulligan et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102647080 | Aug 2012 | CN |
202565160 | Nov 2012 | CN |
0436280 | Jul 1991 | EP |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,558, Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 1, 2013”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,558, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 16, 2014”, 13 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/294,558, Response filed Feb. 28, 2014 to Non Final Office Action mailed Oct. 1, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201210031479.6, Office Action mailed Nov. 1, 2013”, 9 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201210031479.6, Office Action mailed Aug. 14, 2014”, 8 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201210031479.6, Response filed May 15, 2014 to Office Action mailed Nov. 1, 2013”, w/English Claims, 10 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201210031479.6, Office Action mailed Feb. 28, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201210031479.6, Response filed Oct. 29, 2014 to Office Action mailed Aug. 14, 2014”, 14 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201210031479.6, Response filed March 25, 2015 to Office Action mailed Feb. 28, 2015”, 20 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150028678 A1 | Jan 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61441731 | Feb 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13294558 | Nov 2011 | US |
Child | 14511387 | US |