The present application is related to copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/485,067 entitled “Educational Service and Contracts,” filed concurrently herewith, assigned to the assignee of the present application, and hereby incorporated by reference.
Education is an area in which various entities, such as courses, tasks, institution, school, department, degree programs and so forth have many relationships between them. Some of these entities are fairly stable over time, while others change fairly often. For example, new courses are added and others removed fairly often, while each course's tasks are changed and updated regularly. However the school or schools for an institution are relatively stable, although its related data (e.g., users) change.
At the same time, educational institutions have a number of needs that are somewhat tailored to their individual circumstances. For example, an elementary school and a university have different needs. Heretofore, there was no efficient way to capture such relationships in a way that is organized, yet at the same time flexible and extensible for the varied circumstances of educational institutions.
This Summary is provided to introduce a selection of representative concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used in any way that would limit the scope of the claimed subject matter.
Briefly, various aspects of the subject matter described herein are directed towards a technology by which a set of objects represent educational entities of an educational model, each object having a relationship with at least one other object. For example, a course object represents a course, and when instantiated into a course instance, has a relationship with a task instance that includes task-related information for access by users of the educational model. A user object (when instantiated) represents a user of the educational model, and may include data corresponding to at least one course and at least one task.
In addition to course objects, task objects and user objects, the set of objects may include a user credentials object, a group object, a degree program object, a course plan object, an institution object, a school object, and/or a department object.
In one implementation, the set of objects is maintained in a persistent storage as a pre-defined set of objects. This pre-defined set may be extended with an extended object, including associating the extended object with at least one object of the pre-defined set of objects.
In one implementation, the educational entities of an object model are maintained in rows of a table. Each row having a field that identifies which entity of the object model is represented by that row. In use, the table is accessed to determine relationships between an instantiated object for an entity and at least one other instantiated object for another entity. For example, for a course object instance that identifies a course, the table may be accessed to determine a user object instance that represents a student taking that course. Via the table, a task object instance may have a relationship with the course object instance and the user object instance.
Other advantages may become apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the drawings.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limited in the accompanying figures in which like reference numerals indicate similar elements and in which:
Various aspects of the technology described herein are generally directed towards an educational entity architecture and object model that provides an efficient and extendable way of exposing, persisting and retrieving educational entities and the relationships between them. The model provides the ability to have a template object (e.g., for a course) and have multiple instances of that object, thereby supporting differences between instances of that course (e.g., teachers and times). At the same time, the model is extendable to capture new entities, such as outcomes and rubrics, and tie their relationships to existing entities.
While a large number of educational entities, relationships and so forth may exist in any given configuration, it is understood that only a relatively small number of examples are described herein. Thus it should be understood that any of the examples described herein are non-limiting examples. Moreover, other fields such as healthcare, finance and so forth may benefit from the technology described herein. As such, the present invention is not limited to any particular embodiments, aspects, concepts, structures, functionalities or examples described herein. Rather, any of the embodiments, aspects, concepts, structures, functionalities or examples described herein are non-limiting, and the present invention may be used various ways that provide benefits and advantages in computing and object models in general.
Turning to
In general, the model may be implemented as a service 102 or the like (e.g., a web service and/or a SharePoint® shared service) for access by via partners/clients 104 (hereinafter “clients”), such as educational institution users, e.g., administrators, teachers and students. One suitable set of interfaces for accessing the objects is described in the aforementioned related patent application entitled “Educational Service and Contracts.”
The service 102 instantiates the entities as objects 106 from persisted storage 108 while maintaining their relationships. While in one implementation the service 102 is provided as a “cloud” service, it is understood that an alternative service may be implemented in any suitable manner, e.g., in a local network of an educational institution.
As shown in
As can be seen in
With respect to tasks,
As seen in
With respect to the persistent storage, at the database level, the relationships between educational entities are maintained as relationships between the tables using the architecture generally represented in
Note that instead of using different tables for different entities, one implementation uses one table (e.g., EntityMaster 441,
Another similar relationship exists between other educational objects between Items (documents) and first class educational objects (Courses, Groups). This is represented in the database using a fork or multiplexed table, (comprising a table that has reference to other tables, e.g., implementing a 1-to-N relationship). In this case, each Item is related to the Course or Group at the database level, however this relationship is not indicated at the educational object level directly. Instead, the relationship comes from an API (e.g., as described in the related patent application), wherein the Items are accessed based on the context or the first-class educational object only, e.g., Course is used to get Items related to course.
The entity object model (and its relationships) is exposed to the clients 104 and 112 to consume, e.g., via the service 102. At the same time, the model's architecture allows new entities along with new relationships between them to be added easily. In other words, the model provides extensibility for educational entity object model, relationships between educational entities and persistent storage for educational entity object model.
One way that extensibility is facilitated is through the “non-first-class” objects, which in general are generic educational objects including those represented by the dashed-lined boxes in
More particularly, an entity educational object is stored in its own table and maintains the relationships. This provides an extensible persistent storage for the educational entity object model, without requiring special database maintenance or manipulation for each entity type at run time.
As can be seen, the educational entity and object model provides an efficient and logical way of capturing educational relationships and data. The model helps to capture education-related data in a logical way that is used for improving educational effectiveness for both student and teacher users, e.g., by helping each user see relevant information from his or her own perspective.
Moreover, the model can used to provide institutions with other benefits, such as data mining and analysis. Because the data is maintained together, including with its relationships, the mining and analysis are efficient.
Exemplary Operating Environment
The invention is operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations. Examples of well known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with the invention include, but are not limited to: personal computers, server computers, hand-held or laptop devices, tablet devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, distributed computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
The invention may be described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, and so forth, which perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. The invention may also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in local and/or remote computer storage media including memory storage devices.
With reference to
The computer 510 typically includes a variety of computer-readable media. Computer-readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by the computer 510 and includes both volatile and nonvolatile media, and removable and non-removable media. By way of example, and not limitation, computer-readable media may comprise computer storage media and communication media. Computer storage media includes volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information such as computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical disk storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can accessed by the computer 510. Communication media typically embodies computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules or other data in a modulated data signal such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared and other wireless media. Combinations of the any of the above may also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.
The system memory 530 includes computer storage media in the form of volatile and/or nonvolatile memory such as read only memory (ROM) 531 and random access memory (RAM) 532. A basic input/output system 533 (BIOS), containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer 510, such as during start-up, is typically stored in ROM 531. RAM 532 typically contains data and/or program modules that are immediately accessible to and/or presently being operated on by processing unit 520. By way of example, and not limitation,
The computer 510 may also include other removable/non-removable, volatile/nonvolatile computer storage media. By way of example only,
The drives and their associated computer storage media, described above and illustrated in
The computer 510 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 580. The remote computer 580 may be a personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described above relative to the computer 510, although only a memory storage device 581 has been illustrated in
When used in a LAN networking environment, the computer 510 is connected to the LAN 571 through a network interface or adapter 570. When used in a WAN networking environment, the computer 510 typically includes a modem 572 or other means for establishing communications over the WAN 573, such as the Internet. The modem 572, which may be internal or external, may be connected to the system bus 521 via the user input interface 560 or other appropriate mechanism. A wireless networking component 574 such as comprising an interface and antenna may be coupled through a suitable device such as an access point or peer computer to a WAN or LAN. In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the computer 510, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. By way of example, and not limitation,
An auxiliary subsystem 599 (e.g., for auxiliary display of content) may be connected via the user interface 560 to allow data such as program content, system status and event notifications to be provided to the user, even if the main portions of the computer system are in a low power state. The auxiliary subsystem 599 may be connected to the modem 572 and/or network interface 570 to allow communication between these systems while the main processing unit 520 is in a low power state.
Conclusion
While the invention is susceptible to various modifications and alternative constructions, certain illustrated embodiments thereof are shown in the drawings and have been described above in detail. It should be understood, however, that there is no intention to limit the invention to the specific forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, alternative constructions, and equivalents falling within the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6178308 | Bobrow et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6368110 | Koenecke et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6442748 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6587668 | Miller et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6622003 | Denious et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6701125 | Lohse | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6907223 | Murphy | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6988138 | Alcorn et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7326056 | Foster | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7558853 | Alcorn et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20020102525 | Coppolino | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030055842 | Fields et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030069866 | Ohno | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040110119 | Riconda et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040248074 | Hoyashita et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050053908 | Satheesh et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050227216 | Gupta | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060035206 | Clark et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060040248 | Aaron | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060292542 | Levy | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070255805 | Beams et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080004887 | Brunswig et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080098008 | Eid | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080102427 | Nissle | May 2008 | A1 |
20080215731 | Redd et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080216142 | Goldberg et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080318197 | Dion | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319804 | Pulnikova | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090006440 | Tolskyakov et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090182716 | Everhart et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090263779 | White Nye | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090280462 | Yaskin | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090291426 | Polivka | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090325139 | Lloyd et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100223194 | Adams | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100316987 | Charlson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100318657 | Charlson et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
“Welcome to Florida International University Course Catalogs—http://caltalog.fiu.edu/index.php?id=87”, 2006. |
“Welcome to Florida International University Course Catalogs—http://catalog.fiu.edu/index.php?id=87”, 2006. |
Kruchten Philippe B. , “The 4+1 View Model of Architecture”, Retrieved at <<http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=469759&isnumber=9910>>, Nov. 1995, pp. 42-50. |
Bohrer K. A. , “Architecture of the San Francisco Frameworks”, Retrieved at <<http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/372/bohrer.html>>, vol. 37, No. 2, 1998, pp. 1-12. |
Simon, et al., “Elena: A Mediation Infrastructure for Educational Services”, Retrieved at <<http://www.kbs.uni-hannover.de/Arbeiten/Publikationen/2002/elena—draft—simon.pdf>>, WWW2003, Budapest, Hungary, May 20-24, 2003, Pages 4. |
Sampson, et al., “An Architecture for Web-based e-Learning Promoting Re-usable Adaptive Educational e-Content”, Retrieved at <<http://www.ifets.info/journals/5—4/sampson.html>>, Educational Technology & Society 5 (4), 2002, Pages 15. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Nov. 9, 2011 from U.S. Publication 20100316987 (US. Appl. No. 12/485,067), 15 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 26, 2012 from U.S. Publication 20100316987 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/485,067), 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Oct. 9, 2012 from U.S. Publication 20100316987 (U.S. Appl. No.12/485,067), 15 pages. |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 11, 2013 from U.S. Publication 20100316987 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/485,067), 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2013 from U.S. Publication 20100316987 (U.S. Appl. No. 12/485,067), 17 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100318589 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |