Efficient and secure forensic marking in compressed domain

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8681978
  • Patent Number
    8,681,978
  • Date Filed
    Monday, December 17, 2012
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 25, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
Methods, devices, and computer program products enable the embedding of forensic marks in a host content that is in compressed domain. These and other features are achieved by preprocessing of a host content to provide a plurality of host content versions with different embedded watermarks that are subsequently compressed. A host content may then be efficiently marked with forensic marks in response to a request for such content. The marking process is conducted in compressed domain, thus reducing the computational burden of decompressing and re-compressing the content, and avoiding further perceptual degradation of the host content. In addition, methods, devices and computer program products are disclosed that obstruct differential analysis of such forensically marked content.
Description
FIELD OF INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to the field of digital watermarking. More particularly, the present invention relates to efficient and secure embedding and detection of watermarks in a content that is in compressed domain.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This section is intended to provide a background or context to the invention that is recited in the claims. The description herein may include concepts that could be pursued, but are not necessarily ones that have been previously conceived or pursued. Therefore, unless otherwise indicated herein, what is described in this section is not prior art to the description and claims in this application and is not admitted to be prior art by inclusion in this section.


Digital watermarks have been proposed and used for copyright protection of signals such as audio, video, and images. An objective of such watermarking systems is to hide an auxiliary signal within a host signal in such a way that it is substantially imperceptible, and at the same time, difficult to remove without damaging the host signal. The auxiliary signal may carry information that is used to carry out copyright protection mechanisms to varying degrees. For example, the auxiliary signal may merely comprise a “no copy allowed” indication that, once detected and interpreted by a compliant copying device, prevents copying of the host signal. Additionally, or alternatively, the embedded auxiliary signal may carry information that identifies one or more of the rightful owner, author, title or serial number of the host signal. The information contained in the auxiliary signal can also be used for other applications, such as to monitor the usage of embedded content, resolve ownership disputes, keep track of royalties, and the like.


Another application related to digital watermarking involves distinguishing different copies of the same host signal by embedding a unique watermark value into individual copies of a host signal. These applications are sometimes referred to as forensic marking (because the unique watermarks may be used to trace the content to an offending party), transaction marking (because the unique watermarks can identify each legitimate transaction), or fingerprinting (because the unique watermarks can identify perceptually similar host signals, much like fingerprints can identify individuals). Once a content is forensically marked, the embedded watermarks may be used to identify the original source (i.e., legitimate purchaser) of a content, and monitor the subsequent spread of that content through piracy channels. For example, a pirate may purchase a music track over the Internet from a legitimate distributor, directly or using a proxy. Then, the pirate may resell or otherwise redistribute the content in an unauthorized fashion. A similar scenario can occur in the distribution of video or other types of content such as still photos, computer graphics, computer games, and the like that may be distributed over the Internet, or in case of video or music, over “pay-per-view” channels in a cable or satellite TV network. Similarly, copyrighted content that is distributed internally within a content production/distribution entity, or to reviewers or critics prior to their public release, may be illegally used or redistributed. In all of the above cases, it is important to identify the offending party and recover and/or prevent further unauthorized dissemination of the content. Often the fact that forensic marks are present in the content is enough to deter such illegal activities.


Efficient design of a forensic marking procedure is often an important consideration of forensic marking systems since the same host signal often needs to be marked many times. On the other hand, efficient detection of embedded marks may not be a critical consideration for forensic marking systems since watermark detection often takes place only when an illicit activity is detected or suspected. This feature of forensic marking systems may be contrasted to copy-control watermarking systems, where the emphasis is typically on providing a simple extraction method that is easily implemented and carried out in consumer devices, while the embedding (or marking) procedure can be more elaborate and computationally expensive.


Efficiency of a forensic marking system is further complicated due to the fact that a host content (e.g., music, image or video), especially a content that is distributed over the Internet, is often stored and distributed in a compressed format (e.g., MP3 format for music files). In a conventional marking system, the forensic marks are typically applied by first decompressing the host content, embedding the appropriate marks, and re-compressing the content prior to distribution or storage. This procedure has several disadvantages. First, since most compression algorithms involve lossy operations, each round of content decompression and re-compression may further degrades the perceptual quality of the host content. Second, decompression, and, particularly, compression operations are computationally expensive. Therefore, it may not be computationally feasible to decompress and re-compress a content in response to each individual purchase request of that content. It is thus advantageous to apply forensic marks without decompressing and re-compressing the host content.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to systems, methods, devices, and computer program products that enable the application of forensic marks to a host content that is in compressed domain. One aspect of the present invention is related to a method for embedding forensic marks in a host content in compressed domain, comprising: receiving metadata associated with a request for the host content, generating a code in accordance with the metadata, selecting a plurality of tributary segments that are in compressed domain in accordance with the code, and assembling the segments to produce a forensically marked host content in compressed domain. In one example embodiment, the metadata comprises information for identifying the request, while in another example embodiment, the information comprises at least one of a transaction identification, intended destination of the forensically marked host content, and time, date, and source of the request.


In accordance with another example embodiment, the transaction metadata and the code are stored in a database. In yet another example embodiment, the plurality of tributaries are generated by a preprocessing module and stored in a storage unit. According to another embodiment, the tributaries comprise one or more versions of the host content, each version having been embedded with a string of unique watermark symbols and compressed thereafter. In a different embodiment, the watermark symbols are embedded contiguously in each of the versions. Still, in a different embodiment, the tributaries comprise an unmarked host content and at least one version of the host content that is embedded with a string of unique watermark symbols.


According to another embodiment, the tributaries comprise compression units, each compression unit having been embedded with a unique string of watermark symbols. In one example embodiment, the compression units span the entirety of the host content with no intervening unmarked segments. In another embodiment, a watermark symbol interval spans an integer multiple number of the compression units, and in a different embodiment, a watermark symbol interval boundary matches the boundary of an integer number of the compression units. According to another embodiment, the compression units correspond to at least one of a time, a space, and a time-and-space domains. In yet another embodiment, watermarking parameters are adjusted in accordance with compression techniques used for compressing the tributaries. In another example embodiment, the host content is an audio content, and the tributaries are produced using at least one of an AAC, AACplus, and MP3 compression techniques. In still a different embodiment, assembling comprises back-to-back concatenation of the segments.


In another embodiment, the host content is an audio content, the tributaries are compressed using a AAC compressor, and the selecting comprises: selecting a first segment from a first tributary in accordance with a first symbol of the code, selecting a second segment in accordance with a second symbol of the code, wherein if the second symbol is the same as the first symbol, selecting the second segment from the first tributary, and if the second symbol is different from the first symbol, selecting the second segment from a second tributary. According to another embodiment, if selecting the second segment from a second tributary creates perceptual artifacts, selecting the second segment from the first tributary.


According to yet another embodiment, the tributaries are distorted to obstruct differential analysis of the forensically marked host content. In one example embodiment, the distortion comprises non-linear amplitude modification of the host content samples, while in another example embodiment, the distortion comprises applying a different random phase offset to samples of each of the plurality of tributaries prior to the selecting. In still another example embodiment, the distortion comprises modifying the Dynamic Range Control (DRC) bits associated with the tributaries that are in AAC format.


Another aspect of the present invention relates to a device for embedding forensic marks in a host content in compressed domain, comprising: a receiving means configured to receive metadata associated with a request for the host content; a code generator configured to generate a code in accordance with the metadata; a selector configured to select a plurality of tributary segments that are in compressed domain in accordance with the code; and an assembly means configured to assemble the segments to produce a forensically marked host content in compressed domain. Yet another aspect of the present invention relates to a computer program product, embodied on a computer readable medium, for embedding forensic marks in a host content in compressed domain, the computer program product comprising: a computer code for receive metadata associated with a request for the host content; a computer code for generating a code in accordance with the metadata; a computer code for selecting a plurality of tributary segments that are in compressed domain in accordance with the code; and a computer code for assembling the segments to produce a forensically marked host content in compressed domain.


These and other advantages and features of various embodiments of the present invention, together with the organization and manner of operation thereof, will become apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the invention are described by referring to the attached drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram for forensic marking in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 illustrates the formation of forensically marked content in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 3 illustrates a block diagram for preprocessing operations in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 4 illustrates a block diagram for marking operations in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 5 illustrates a forensically marked content in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 6 illustrates example window shapes in Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) compression algorithm;



FIG. 7 illustrates a flow diagram for switch inhibit operation in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 8(A) illustrates a non-linear amplitude modifier in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 8(B) illustrates an example characteristic plot of the non-linear amplitude modifier of FIG. 8(A).





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF CERTAIN EMBODIMENTS

In the following description, for purposes of explanation and not limitation, details and descriptions are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced in other embodiments that depart from these details and descriptions.


The various embodiments of the present invention enable the application of forensic marks to a host content that is in compressed domain. The detection and recovery of such forensic marks from the host content may be carried out using either conventional watermark detection systems (e.g., computationally inexpensive detectors that are implemented in consumer devices) or may be accomplished with more sophisticated forensic detectors with enhanced detection capabilities.


One consideration in designing and applying the forensic marks to a host content is resiliency of the embedded marks against collusion attacks and differential analysis. For example, an attacker may obtain two copies of a host content with different embedded marks, subtract the two copies, analyze the difference signal in order to gain information regarding the watermarking technique, and devise sophisticated attacks to remove or interfere with the embedded watermarks. Furthermore, an attacker may average a number of copies of a host content in order to weaken individual marks within each content, make them interfere, and eventually render them undetectable. An attacker may also cut different segments from different copies of a host content and splice them together to produce a single copy with multiple forensic marks. This type of attack makes it difficult to identify a single source of piracy.


Commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,430,301, entitled “Formation and Analysis of Signals with Common and Transaction Watermarks,” describes a technique that allows the application of forensic marks in compressed domain while providing substantial immunity against collusion attacks. However, the technique disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,430,301 requires the presence of “Common Watermarks” within a host content that are interleaved with “Transaction Watermarks.” The Common Watermark intervals are situated between adjacent symbols of Transaction Watermarks and occupy substantial portions of the host content, however, they do not contain transactional information. The forensic marking techniques described in accordance with the various embodiments of the present invention similarly provide for the embedding of forensic watermarks into a content that is in compressed format but they eliminate the need for Common Watermark intervals, thus improving the density of Transaction Watermark symbols, and efficiency of forensic marking. These and other features of the various embodiments of the present invention are achieved while avoiding perceptual artifacts beyond those inherent to the watermarking technology itself.


Furthermore, while the U.S. Pat. No. 6,430,301 discloses a technique that allows identifying multiple offending parties involved in a collusion attack, it doesn't thwart the threat of a differential analysis attack. Such an attack may reveal information regarding the deployed watermarking technology and may lead to the design of attacks that destroy (e.g., erase or jam) the embedded watermarks. The forensic marking techniques described in accordance with the various embodiments of the present invention have the further advantage of obstructing an attacker's attempts to reverse engineer the deployed watermarking technology, thus thwarting potential differential analysis attack.



FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram for embedding forensic marks in a host content 41 in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention. The forensic marking system 10 includes a preprocessing module 12, a marking module 14 and a database 16. The preprocessing stage, which typically comprises computationally expensive operations such as watermark embedding and compression, may be carried out at a different time, and/or at a different location, than the marking stage. The preprocessing module 12 comprises one or more embedder modules 18 to 22 that embed a host signal 41 with a plurality of marks. Each embedder 18 to 22 embeds a distinct string of symbols in the host content 41. For example, a first embedder 18 may embed a first logical value, while a second embedder 20 may embed a second logical value in the host content 41 to produce two different versions of the host content. Note that some symbols may be the same in the different versions of the embedded host content (e.g. headers), and one version of the embedded host content may comprise a first string of symbols, for example, the binary pattern “0101 . . . ” while another may comprise, for example, the binary string “1010 . . . ” It should be noted that while the example embodiment of the present invention as shown in FIG. 1 illustrates separate embedders 18 to 22 that are deployed in parallel for embedding each distinct watermark symbol, a single embedder module may be used to embed all symbols, for example, in a serial fashion. Alternatively, the embedding of the plurality of symbols may be carried out by separate embedders that share one or more components or modules.


It should also be noted that the embedding of the different symbols may, but is not required to, be conducted using the same embedding technology or algorithm. Thus, for example, a first symbol may be embedded using a first watermarking technology while a second symbol may be embedded using a second embedding technology. However, the important restriction is that all watermark symbols use the same symbol interval, and be embedded synchronously within the host content 41. As a result, the outputs of embedders 18 to 22 comprise different versions of a host content, which although perceptually similar, comprise different embedded watermarks. The term “symbol interval” is generically used herein to refer to the extent of a host content that is used to carry an individual watermark symbol. For example, when embedding a one dimensional host content, such as an audio signal, a symbol interval may correspond to the duration of the host content that accommodates the embedding of a watermark symbol. Analogously, when embedding a two dimensional host content, such as a still image, a symbol interval may correspond to the spatial extent of the host content that accommodates the embedding of a watermark symbol. For a multi-dimensional host content, such as a video signal, a symbol interval may comprise a temporal, spatial, or combination of temporal and spatial, extent of the host content that accommodates the embedding of a watermark symbol. Furthermore, a symbol interval may comprise an extent of a host content that can accommodate the embedding of a watermark symbol in a different domain, such as in frequency domain.


Referring back to FIG. 1, after embedding of the host content 41 with a plurality of watermark symbols, the different versions of marked host content are compressed by compressors 24 to 28 using one or more perceptual compression techniques, such as MPEG, JPEG, and the like. The compressed content may then be saved in a storage unit 32 that comprises, for example, one or more hard disks, RAMs, optical disks, flash memory devices, and the like. In addition, the un-marked host content 41 may optionally be compressed in compressor 30, and saved in the storage unit 32, as well. It should be noted that while the example embodiment of the present invention as shown in FIG. 1 illustrates separate compressors 24 to 30 that are deployed in parallel for embedding different versions of the host content, a single compressor 24 may be used for compression the different versions of the host content, for example, in a serial fashion. Alternatively, the different versions of the host content may be compressed using separate compressors that share one or more components or modules. The term “tributary” is used herein to refer to the different versions of the host content that have been compressed and are made available to the marking module 14. It should be noted that while the exemplary embodiment of the present invention as shown in FIG. 1 illustrates a memory unit 32 that is located within the preprocessing module, such memory unit 32 may reside outside of the preprocessing module 12. Furthermore, in an example embodiment of the present invention, the need for a permanent storage unit may be eliminated by saving the tributaries in temporary storage, such as in RAM, or run-time memory. This configuration may be used, for example, for a one-time generation of a number of forensically marked content that are distributed to content reviewers.


In accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention, at the end of the preprocessing stage, at least two distinct versions of the host content that are at least partially overlapping are produced. For example, at the end of the preprocessing stage, the storage unit 32 may contain a complete compressed copy of the unmarked content together with a partial copy of the host content that is marked by a first embedder 18. Alternatively, the storage unit 32 may contain two full copies of the host content, one marked by a first embedder 18, and the other marked by a second embedder 20, but without a compressed version of the unmarked host content. Note that marked and unmarked versions of the host content are perceptually similar, and thus either version, or a composite version that is produced by splicing different segments of each version, may be presented to the user. The particular selection of candidate segments from the plurality tributaries forms the basis of forensic marking in accordance with the various embodiments of the present invention. For example, with only two distinct versions of the host content at the output of the preprocessing stage, the marking module 14 can create a marked content 40 that comprises binary watermark symbols. However, if M distinct tributaries are created by the pre-processing module 12, each comprising a different watermark symbol, the marking module 14 can generate a marked content 40 with M-ary watermark symbols.


The preprocessing operations in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention is further described in the flow diagram of FIG. 3. In Step 300, a host content is received at the preprocessing module. In Step 302, the received host content is embedded with one or more strings of watermark symbols to create different versions of the embedded host content. Note that some embedded symbols in the different versions of the embedded host content may be the same among different copies, yet the overall string of embedded symbols may be unique for each version. In Step 304, the different versions of the embedded host content, including the unmarked host content, are compressed to form a plurality of tributaries. Finally, in Step 306, the plurality of tributaries are stored in a storage unit that is accessible to the marking module.


Referring back to FIG. 1, the marking module 14 is responsible for creating forensically marked content 40 in compressed domain using relatively inexpensive operations. This task may be accomplished by combining portions of two or more tributaries using a multiplexer (MUX) 34. In one example embodiment, the generation of the forensically marked content 40 may be initiated as a single transaction, for example, upon a user's request to purchase a content, while in a different example embodiment, the marking may be initiated by a batch process that results in the creation of a plurality of uniquely marked content for subsequent distribution. In either example embodiment, the marking request is associated with transaction metadata 38 that describes the details of transaction, such as the intended destination of the marked content, time, date and source of the request, or other information that uniquely identifies the transaction. Each request for the creation of a marked content 40 may trigger the generation of a unique code in Code Generator 36. This code that is ultimately embedded in the marked content 40, is also saved in database 16, along with the associated transaction metadata 38. The database 16 may later be used to link the codes that are extracted from a marked content to the transaction that caused the creation of that particular content. It should be noted that the marked content may alternatively, or additionally, be viewed and/or transmitted to a remote location for viewing. For example, the marked content may be viewed in real time subsequent to, or during, the forensic marking process. The forensically marked content may also be saved on different kinds of computer readable media, including, but not limited to, DVDs, CDs, Flash memory devices and the like.


The code generated by the code generator 36 controls the operation of the MUX 34, and governs the selection of content segments from different tributaries. It should be noted that the MUX 34 has access to some or all of the tributaries. As such, the MUX may select the appropriate tributaries from the available tributaries. Alternatively, or additionally, the MUX may request and receive the desired tributaries, or portions thereof, from one or more entities that have access to and/or contain the tributaries. Further, the MUX 34 may comprise various components and subcomponents that allow the selection, retrieval, and assembly of a plurality of content segments. For example, the MUX may be equipped with a processor, memory, and communication ports that allow the implementation and execution of the various data manipulations, as well as data and command input/output operations. To this end, the MUX 34 may be implemented as software, hardware, firmware or combinations thereof. The operation of the MUX 34 may be further illustrated using an example embodiment of the present invention depicted in FIG. 2, in which two one-dimensional tributaries are available for marking a host content using binary watermark symbols. In the example embodiment of FIG. 2, a first tributary 42 may correspond to a compressed version of a host content that is embedded repeatedly and consecutively with all-zero watermark symbols, and a second tributary 44 may correspond to a compressed version of a host content that is embedded repeatedly and consecutively with all-one watermark symbols. Generally, perceptual compression algorithms, such as MPEG or JPEG, divide the host content into compression units or frames, where each compression unit is independently processed and stored. The compression units 48-1, 48-2, . . . , 48-K corresponding to the first tributary 42, and the compression units 50-1, 50-2, . . . , 50-K corresponding to the second tributary 44 are illustrated in FIG. 2. Once a transaction request is initiated, the code generator 36 generates a unique transaction code in accordance with the transaction metadata 38 associated with the transaction request. For example, the code generator 36 may generate a binary code “00101” associated with a particular request. The MUX 34 then selects the appropriate compression units from tributaries according to the code provided by the code generator 36, and assembles the marked content 40 as concatenations of the various segments of the two tributaries. This technique is often referred to as a cut-and-splice procedure.


The cut-and-splice procedure for forming the forensically marked content 40 corresponding to the exemplary binary code “00101” involves selecting the first compression unit 48-1 from the first tributary 42, the second compression unit 48-2 from the first tributary 42, the third compression unit 50-3 from the second tributary 44, the fourth compression unit 48-4 from the first tributary, and the fifth compression unit 50-5 from the second tributary 44. The forensically marked content 40 may be produced by back-to-back concatenation of the above noted compression units.


Note that each compression unit should contain information that can be independently interpreted by the matching perceptual decoder to reconstruct the host content. Moreover, the length of the watermark symbol interval should be equal to the length of one or more compression units. That is, a watermark symbol interval may span an integer multiple number of compression units. Additionally, a symbol boundary may substantially match the boundary of a compression unit (or an integer number of compression units). For instance, the example embodiment of FIG. 2 illustrates the case where the bit interval matches the length of one compression unit. Although the above example embodiment have been described using a binary watermarking alphabet, those skilled in the art can readily generalize this procedure to deliver M tributaries to the marking module 14, generate M-ary codes using the code generator 36, and assemble a forensically marked content with M-ary symbols using the MUX.


In accordance with another example embodiment, only portions of the content may be marked using the above described cut-and-splice technique. In such an example embodiment, the forensically marked content may comprise unmarked sections that are selected from the unmarked tributary (i.e., the output of compressor 30). The unmarked segments of the content may be used, for example, to embed another forensic mark at a different node within the sales/distribution chain of the content.



FIG. 4 illustrates the marking operations in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention. Once a request for a particular host content is submitted, the transaction metadata associated with that request is received by the marking module in Step 400. In Step 402, a unique code associated with the received transaction metadata is generated, and in Step 404, this code, along with the appropriate transaction metadata is stored in one or more databases. In Step 406, segments of different tributaries associated with the requested host content are selected in accordance with the generated code. In Step 408, the marked content is generated by back-to-back concatenation of the tributary segments in accordance with the particular order that corresponds to the generated code.


The above-described cut-and-splice procedure may be adapted to operate with different perceptual compression technologies that utilize compression units of different size. This approach requires more flexibility in selecting and designing the particular parameters associated with watermark embedding technologies. For example, different watermark symbol intervals may need to be selected for Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) audio compression as opposed to MPEG audio compression algorithm. However, this is not a significant restriction since the list of candidate compression technologies is finite. Thus, a set of watermarking parameters that are suitable for use with the most commonly used (or even with an exhaustive list of) compression technologies can be created. Once a compression technology for compression of the host content is selected, the marking of different symbols at the preprocessing stage can be readily conducted in accordance with the watermarking parameters that are suited for that particular compression technology. The extraction of the embedded forensic marks can be similarly conducted using the above-noted list of watermarking parameters. If the content is still in compressed format (or the compression technology is otherwise known), the appropriate watermark parameters associated with that compression technology can be retrieved and used for extracting the embedded watermarks. If the content is not in compressed format (and the compression technology is not otherwise known), watermark extraction may be conducted by selecting candidate watermark parameters, one at a time, in multiple attempts to extract the embedded forensic marks. However, since the code extraction is likely to be conducted in a forensic environment, watermark parameters for a particular content is likely to be known prior to the extraction process (e.g., stored in a database along with transaction metadata). For example, a music track that is released by a certain music studio is likely to be released in only one or two different compressed formats. Accordingly, when such a music track is discovered in a piracy network, watermark parameters associated with one or two candidate compression technologies are merely needed to successfully extract the embedded watermarks.


By the way of example, and not by limitation, the following provides an detailed example of how watermarking parameters may be adjusted for use with a particular perceptual compression technology. In accordance with this example embodiment, audio watermarking parameters are tailored to be used with AAC compression technology. In AAC, as in most other audio compression technologies, time domain audio samples are first transformed to frequency domain samples. The transformation used in AAC is Modified Discrete Cosine Transform (MDCT) with 50% windowed overlap. The compressed bitstream contains all information needed to reconstruct the spectrum. Frequency domain values in each bitstream unit are independent from those of other units. Note that, with AAC, this occurs when the inter-frame prediction is disabled (prediction can be inter-frame or intra-frame, i.e., between adjacent frames or within one frame). In order to reconstruct the time domain audio samples, an Inverse Modified Discrete Cosine Transform (IMDCT) is performed with 50% windowed overlap. Details of AAC compression and decompression algorithms may be found in various references, for example, in “Dai Tracy Yang, Chris Kyriakakis, and C.-C. Jay Kuo, “High Fidelity Multichannel Audio Coding”, EURASIP book series on Signal Processing and Communications, 2004.” FIG. 5 illustrates an example string of overlapping windows 60 for compression units with matching watermarking bits.


Note that in the example embodiment of FIG. 5, two compression units (or frames) are used for embedding one watermark bit. More specifically, in AAC compression, each frame comprises exactly 2048 samples converted into MDCT domain, but in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention, the start of each frame is shifted by 1024 samples in order to create a 50% overlap. Each frame is 2048 samples, but with 50% overlap, the next frame starts 1024 samples after the start of the current frame. By having a bit interval with 2048 samples, each watermark bit may be selected to span two consecutive frames of a tributary. This way, the middle 1024 samples, where the two frames overlap, carry the undisturbed watermark symbol. On each side, of the undisturbed portion, there are 1024-sample tails that transition into the adjacent bit intervals. Due to the window shape, the watermark bit is dominant in half of the tail on each side of the 1024-sample undisturbed portion, making each bit interval 1024+2*512=2048 samples long. Using this technique, up to 1024 samples of each bit interval may produce interference with the adjacent bit intervals if the adjacent bits are selected from different tributaries. However, if adjacent bits are selected from the same tributary as the current bit tributary, the overlapping bit segments do not produce any interference. In the example case where an audio sampling rate of 44.1 kHz is used, the watermarking bit rate of the forensic mark is 44100/2048=21.533 bits per second.


Referring back to FIG. 1, the MUX 34 selects the appropriate frames from the tributaries in accordance with the code generated by the code generator 36. Transition from one tributary to another takes place when there is a transition in the generated code from one symbol to another. This transition does not produce noticeable artifacts as long as the tributaries are perceptually similar, and the window shapes associated with the compression technologies of all tributaries are substantially similar to each other. However, if the window shapes are appreciably different, it is possible to create perceptible artifacts at symbol transition points within the marked content.


In accordance with another example embodiment of the present invention, these perceptible artifacts may be avoided even if the window shapes are not the same. FIG. 6 illustrates the various window shapes that are utilized in the AAC compression algorithm. The top portion of FIG. 6 contains a sequence of the so-called long windows 80. The long windows 80 provide good audio quality for slowly changing audio signals, such as tonal music. However, in the presence of fast changing audio signals, such as a percussion attack, the long windows 80 may introduce undesirable effects of a pre-echo in the audio signal. In this case, a better audio quality is achieved by using the so-called short windows 84-1 to 84-8 that are shown in FIG. 6. The AAC compressor is capable of automatically detecting audio attacks and changing the window shape from long to short, as needed, to provide the desirable audio quality. Note that one compression unit (or frame) carries data that is associated with one long window, or eight short windows. In order to smooth the transition points from a long to a short window, and from a short to a long window, and to avoid audible artifacts, the AAC algorithm introduces two additional windows: a long-start window 82, and a long-stop window 86, as also illustrated in FIG. 6. In AAC, the criterion for design of the transition window is that the squared sum of the first half of the window and the second half of the window should equal to one. Therefore, if a short window is required after several long windows, then the last window before the start of the short window should be a long start window. Similarly, when short window is followed by a long window, the first window after the short window should be a long stop window.


When AAC audio compression is used to carry out forensic marking according to the various embodiments of the present invention, the transition points from one tributary to another may trigger the selection of a different window type. Typically different tributaries that are created in accordance with the various embodiments of the present invention are perceptually similar. Therefore, the AAC window selection mechanism is likely to detect audio attacks (and switch to short windows) at the same locations within the compression frames of all tributaries. However, occasionally the AAC compressor may select different window types for different tributaries. This disparity of window selection between the different tributaries may create audible artifacts in the forensically marked content. For example, the transition from a tributary frame with a long window to another tributary with a short window, without the intermediate long-start window, may create an audible artifact in the output audio stream since such transition violates the window transition criterion discussed above. One example scenario may involve the case where the percussion attack in the second tributary is detected slightly earlier than in the first tributary, and as a result the position of the short windows are shifted by one frame. So, for example, the first tributary may comprise the following sequence of windows: long, long-start, short, long-stop, while the second tributary may comprise the following sequence: long-start, short, long-stop, long. If now the embedding of the forensic marks necessitates a transition from the first tributary to a second tributary between the first and the second unit of the sequence of windows, the resulting window sequence will be long, short, long-stop, long, which can potentially produce an audio artifact in the middle of the window sequence.


In order to avoid such perceptible artifacts, the MUX 34 of FIG. 1, in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention, may be configured to receive information regarding the various window shapes that are employed in frames of different tributaries, whenever a switch between different tributaries is mandated by the generated code. In this example embodiment, if the MUX 34 detects a window mismatch between the tributary frames, switching to the new tributary may be inhibited by asserting a “switch abandon” action. The switch abandon, when asserted, effectively introduces a symbol error in the embedded forensic marks that are embedded in the host content. FIG. 7 illustrates a block diagram of the different steps involved in determination of a switch abandon assertion. The process starts in Step 700 of FIG. 7 when a transition in the generated forensic mark code value is detected. In Step 702, information regarding the window utilized by the compressor for at least the tributary corresponding to the new symbol value is retrieved. The window information, such as window shape information, is compared to the window information corresponding to the currently used tributary in Step 704. If the window information is the same, switching to the tributary that corresponds to the new symbol value is permitted in Step 708. If the window information is not the same, it is determined, in Step 706, whether or not switching to a different tributary results in perceptible artifacts. For example, if the switching occurs from one tributary having long and long windows, to another tributary with long and long-start windows, there is no need to hold switching, since at the transition moment, long and long-start windows have the same tails. Furthermore, if the transition region coincides with a “silent” portion of the audio content, switching to a different tributary with a different window shape may not produce perceptible artifacts. When no perceptible artifacts are produced, switching to a different tributary is permitted in Step 708. If switching produces perceptible artifacts, the switching may be abandoned in Step 710. As a result of Step 710, the use of the current tributary persists until switching to a new tributary is initiated by another transition in the code value.


According to the experimental results conducted for audio signals, bit errors introduced as a result of abandon switch assertions are fairly rare, and can be corrected by error correction codes that are normally used in the formation of watermark bit streams. Alternatively, or additionally, bit error locations due to switch abandon assertions can be saved in a database that is accessible to the forensic mark extractor. This information can be used during the extraction process to identify and correct these bit errors.


The abandon switch may be asserted whenever the concatenation of content segments from different tributaries is likely to create perceptible artifacts. As such, the abandon switch may be asserted not only when window shapes differ (e.g., a mismatch between long and short windows), but also when different types of windows are used. For example, an abandon switch action may be asserted when one tributary is using a Kaiser-Bessel Derived (KBD) window, while the other tributary is using a Sine window. Experimental results on audio signals have confirmed that the number of switch abandon instances depend strongly on the type of perceptual compressor and the operation mode selection used in a particular application. Note that AAC compressor may allow the use of a mixture of KBD and Sine window types, or the use Sine windows only. Since some perceptual compressors do not use Kaiser-Bessel Derived windows at all, the mismatch with Sine window is avoided altogether when such compressors are utilized. Accordingly, if there is some flexibility in selecting a perceptual compressor, it may be advantageous to test multiple compressor candidates to determine which compressor is likely to produce the minimum number, and density, of switch abandon events.


In the case of a multi-channel content (such as a multi-channel audio content), each channel may be embedded independently, but synchronously, with the same forensic mark. However, in such cases, it may be possible that abandon switch action is asserted in some, but not all, of the channels. This is an undesirable situation since it may lead to the embedding of different symbols in different channels, which may cause audio artifacts. For example, such a mismatch in the embedding of the left and right channels of a stereo signal may cause a shift in space of the sound source, which may or may not result in a significant audio artifact. Furthermore, if an attacker attempts to use a channel mixdown attack (i.e., when two or more channels are mixed into a single channel) to weaken or remove the embedded watermarks, the differing symbols embedded in the corresponding locations of the different channels are likely to interfere with each other. Therefore, in accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention, the assertion of an abandon switch action in one channel may automatically trigger an abandon switch assertion in all other channels at the same content location. Additionally, or alternatively, many perceptual compressors may be configurable to use the same set of compression parameters, such as window shapes, for all channels. By selecting this configuration option, the number and density of abandon switch activations may be further reduced.


The procedures described above in connection with AAC compression algorithm can be readily applicable to other compression techniques. For example, MPEG-1, 2 and 4 audio compression techniques all use a similar frame structure. In particular, while the frame size of AAC compression is 1024 samples, AACplus frames contain 2048 samples, and MP3 frames contain 1152 samples. Many popular speech codecs, such as CELP, EVRC, AMR, and the like, also use a frame-based compression architecture (e.g., the general frame size is 20 ms), and therefore can be readily adapted for forensic marking in accordance with the various embodiments of the present invention. Typical image and video compression techniques are also similarly designed in accordance with fixed block-size architectures. For example, JPEG compression technique is based on 8×8 DCT transform blocks, which may be treated as one compression unit. JPEG2000 uses wavelet transforms, which are not block based in time domain However, it is still possible to carryout similar cut-and-splice operations in a compressed transformed domain to apply the forensic marks in accordance with the various embodiments of the present invention to JPEG2000 content. Forensic marking techniques in accordance with the various embodiments of the present invention may also be readily adapted for use with video compression techniques. For example, in MPEG compression algorithm, a video stream is comprised of three different Intra-coded (I), Bi-directional (B), and Predicted (P) frames. P and B frames are predicted from other frames. But I frames are independently compressed and decompressed, and thus can be treated as independent units (or as a still image with multiple independent units) for the purposes of forensic marking in accordance with the various embodiments of the present invention.


Differential Analysis Obstruction


An attacker may attempt to defeat a forensic watermarking system by obtaining two or more copies of the same content marked by distinct forensic marks. By subtracting one copy from the other, the attacker may find content locations that carry different forensic symbols, and obtain the difference between the embedded symbols. By analyzing this difference signal, an attacker may be able to reverse engineer the watermarking technology and find the secret information (i.e., the stego key) used for embedding the forensic marks. Using this information, the attacker may be able to further devise attacks to remove, jam, or even forge the embedded watermarks. In accordance with example embodiments of the present invention, differential analysis attacks on forensically marked content may be thwarted. The disclosed methods may be used separately, or in combination with each other, to obstruct the differential analysis of forensically marked contents.


In accordance with one example embodiment, one or more signal distortions may be introduced in different tributaries during the preprocessing stage. These distortions, which do not convey any watermark information, must be different in each tributary, and at the same time, must be perceptually insignificant. The introduced distortions effectively mask the presence of the embedded watermarks. An attacker is then faced with the challenge of distinguishing between the components of the difference signal that are truly related to the watermark technology and those that are merely due to the introduced distortion. By the way of example, and not by limitation, non-linear amplitude modification of the content is one such distortion that may be introduced as part of each embedder 18 to 22 functionality in FIG. 1. This distortion may be applied, for example, to each version of the host content, either before or after embedding of the symbol values. This technique produces different distortions in each tributary but has insignificant impact on the embedded host quality.



FIG. 8(A) shows an example embodiment of the present invention illustrating the application of nonlinear amplitude modification to input samples of a host content. In FIG. 8(A), each input sample 92 of a host content is modified by the non-linear amplitude modifier 90 to produce an output sample 94. FIG. 8(B) illustrates an example plot in the form of an input—output sample characteristic deviating from a straight line that is associated with the non-linear modifier 90 of FIG. 8(A). The straight line 96 is produced when the input and output samples are equal. When non-linear amplitude modification is applied, the output samples deviate from the input samples as illustrated by the characteristic (curved) line 98 of FIG. 8(B). In order to thwart differential analysis of the embedded content, a different characteristic line must be produced for each version of the host content that is subjected to non-linear amplitude modification. However, it is also desirable to make the variations due to non-linear amplitude modification to change slowly and randomly with time to make reverse engineering of the applied distortion more difficult.


Another candidate distortion for thwarting differential analysis is the introduction of random phase offsets into the host content that is disclosed in the commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,145,081. This distortion may be applied independently to each version of the host content as part of the embedder 18 to 22 functionality. Similar to the above-described non-linear amplitude modification, the introduction of random phase offsets does not produce perceptible artifacts but creates a large difference between the different versions of the host content. This large difference obstructs differential analysis of the content that may be conducted by an attacker to gain insights into the watermarking technology. Note that the technique disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,145,081 introduces a different phase offset into each copy (not tributary) of the fully embedded host content, with the objective to produce annoying artifacts when averaging or splicing attacks are used. In accordance with the example embodiments of the present invention, however, each tributary is subjected to a random phase offset. Accordingly, a forensically marked content may comprise a plurality of sections, where each section has undergone a different random phase modification. Therefore, an attacker is faced with the challenge of defeating a plurality of phase offset distortions.


In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, differential attack obstruction may be effected by using two or more distinct watermarking technologies for embedding the same symbol in the same compression unit(s). This way, an attacker is further frustrated by facing the challenge of determining which of the plurality of features of the difference signal is associated with a particular embedding technology.


In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, differential analysis obstruction through the introduction of host signal variations may be implemented at the marking stage, after the multiplexing. In devising different techniques to obscure differential analysis of embedded content, the objective is to increase the difference between distinct copies of the marked content by manipulating parameters of compressed domain stream differently for each copy. In accordance with another example embodiment of the present invention, this task may be accomplished in an AAC compressor by introducing small, random amplitude modifications using AAC Fill elements, without introducing noticeable audio artifacts. This process doesn't require decompression of the host content, and thus is computationally inexpensive. At the same time, it effectively masks the watermark features that may be otherwise detectable in the difference signal. Furthermore, the random nature of modifications makes it difficult to reverse engineer the obstruction methodology.


In one example embodiment, changing the Dynamic Range Control (DRC) in the Fill element of a compressed AAC bitstream may effect masking of the watermark symbols. Note that DRC is part of the regular bitstream for each frame and is used by the AAC decompressor to produce de-compressed audio samples with a proper dynamic range. With DRC bits enabled, the final decompressed audio content is produced according to Equation (1):

sound_data′=sound_data*Δ  (1)

where sound_data′ represents the decompressed audio samples after applying DRC, sound_data represents the decompressed audio samples before applying DRC, and Δ is a factor (i.e., a number) that is calculated from the DRC bits in order to produce decompressed audio samples with a proper dynamic range. A detailed description of the various DRC data elements may be found, for example, in “International Organisation For Standardisation Organisation Internationale De Normalisation ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 Coding Of Moving Pictures And Audio, MPEG-4 Audio.” Note that the absence of DRC bits in the bitstream (i.e., the DRC signaling bit is 0) may be treated as having a Δ value of 1. The value of Δ can be changed from one compression frame to another, or even from one sub-frame to another sub-frame, depending on the bit information in the DRC bitstream. The higher the number of the sub-frames, the more bits are inserted in the DRC portion of the bitstream. In accordance with an example embodiment of the present invention, in order to obstruct differential analysis of a decompressed content, the value of Δ associated with each tributary may be varied from its original value by a small amount in order to effect random amplitude modifications in the decompressed audio samples. Since Δ is calculated from the DRC bits of the compressed bitstream, by changing and/or inserting a few bits into the DRC portion of each compressed tributary, the final value of the decompressed audio samples may be changed. Since a compressed AAC tributary may not have any DRC bits (i.e., DRC signaling bit is 0), DRC bits may be added to the compressed bitstream in accordance with another example embodiment of the present invention. For example, at least 39 bits per frame may be added to a compressed AAC bitstream to allow the extraction of a Δ value from the compressed bit stream (while setting the DRC signaling bit to 1). Note that the addition of such additional bits (e.g., 39 bits) only amounts to about one percent increase in the total number of bits in a frame. If the DRC bits are already present in the bitstream, the modification of these bits to produce a different Δ value, in accordance to the example embodiments of the present invention, may or may not result in an increase in the total number of bits per frame. Any increase, however, is likely to be very small.


It is understood that the various embodiments of the present invention may be implemented individually, or collectively, in devices comprised of various hardware and/or software modules and components. These devices, for example, may comprise a processor, a memory unit, an interface that are communicatively connected to each other, and may range from desktop and/or laptop computers, to consumer electronic devices such as media players, mobile devices and the like. For example, referring back to FIG. 1, the Preprocessing and Marking modules may be implemented in software, hardware, firmware, or combinations thereof. Similarly, the various components or sub-components within each module may be implemented in software, hardware, firmware. The connectivity between the modules and/or components within the modules may be provided using any one of the connectivity methods and media that is known in the art, including, but not limited to, communications over the Internet, wired, or wireless networks using the appropriate protocols.


Various embodiments described herein are described in the general context of methods or processes, which may be implemented in one embodiment by a computer program product, embodied in a computer-readable medium, including computer-executable instructions, such as program code, executed by computers in networked environments. A computer-readable medium may include removable and non-removable storage devices including, but not limited to, Read Only Memory (ROM), Random Access Memory (RAM), compact discs (CDs), digital versatile discs (DVD), etc. Generally, program modules may include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Computer-executable instructions, associated data structures, and program modules represent examples of program code for executing steps of the methods disclosed herein. The particular sequence of such executable instructions or associated data structures represents examples of corresponding acts for implementing the functions described in such steps or processes.


The foregoing description of embodiments has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. The foregoing description is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit embodiments of the present invention to the precise form disclosed, and modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teachings or may be acquired from practice of various embodiments. The embodiments discussed herein were chosen and described in order to explain the principles and the nature of various embodiments and its practical application to enable one skilled in the art to utilize the present invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. The features of the embodiments described herein may be combined in all possible combinations of methods, apparatus, modules, systems, and computer program products.

Claims
  • 1. A method, comprising: selecting a watermark symbol interval for embedding watermark symbols within a host content, wherein the watermark symbol interval spans an integer multiple of compression units of a particular compression algorithm;obtaining at least a portion of the host content in uncompressed format;producing a first tributary by embedding a first watermark symbol in at least one watermark symbol interval within the uncompressed host content and compressing at least the embedded portions of the host content thereafter using the particular compression algorithm; andmaking the first tributary and at least a second tributary available to one of a content handling device or a computer readable storage medium for production of a marked host content.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the particular compression algorithm is selected from a group of compression algorithms consisting of: AAC, AACplus, MP3, JPEG, JPEG2000 and MPEG.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the host content is one of: a still image, a video content or an audio content.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the watermark symbol interval corresponds to one or more of: a duration of the host content in uncompressed format;a spatial extent of the host content in uncompressed format;a combination of spatial and temporal extent of the host content in uncompressed format; oran extent of the host content in a frequency domain in uncompressed format.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the second tributary is an unmarked version of the host content in compressed format.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the second tributary comprises a second watermark symbol, and the second tributary is produced by embedding the second watermark symbol in the at least one watermark symbol interval within the uncompressed host content and compressing at least the portions of the host content embedded with the second watermark symbol thereafter using the particular compression algorithm.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, comprising: making a third tributary available to the to one of a content handling device and a computer readable storage medium, wherein at least a portion of the third tributary comprises a third watermark symbol, and the third tributary is produced by embedding the third watermark symbol in the at least one watermark symbol interval within the uncompressed host content and compressing the at least portions of the host content embedded with the third watermark symbol thereafter using the particular compression algorithm.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein corresponding portions of each of the first and at least the second tributary are perceptually similar.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein one or more of the first tributary or the at least the second tributary comprises less than all segments of the host content.
  • 10. A method for producing a marked content, comprising: accessing, by a marking device, a first and at least a second tributary, the first tributary having been produced by embedding a first watermark symbol within an uncompressed version of the host content in at least a first watermark symbol interval and compressing at least the embedded portions of the host content thereafter according to a particular compression format, the first watermark symbol interval spanning an integer number of compression units of the particular compression algorithm;selecting at least one segment from each of the first and the at least the second tributary based on a code, wherein each of the selected segments spans an integer number of compression units of the particular compression algorithm;assembling the selected segments at the marking device, without decompressing the selected segments, to produce a marked content.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the particular compression algorithm is selected from a group of compression algorithms consisting of: AAC, AACplus, MP3, JPEG, JPEG2000 and MPEG.
  • 12. The method of claim 10, wherein the marked content is one of: a still image, a video content or an audio content.
  • 13. The method of claim 10, wherein the first watermark interval corresponds to one or more of: a duration of the host content in uncompressed format;a spatial extent of the host content in uncompressed format;a combination of spatial and temporal extent of the host content in uncompressed format; oran extent of the host content in a frequency domain in uncompressed format.
  • 14. The method of claim 10, wherein the second tributary is an unmarked version of the host content in compressed format.
  • 15. The method of claim 10, wherein at least a portion of the second tributary comprises a second watermark symbol, the second tributary having been produced by embedding the second watermark symbol in the at least one watermark symbol interval within the uncompressed host content and compressing at least portions of the host content embedded with the second watermark symbol thereafter using the particular compression algorithm.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, comprising accessing a third tributary, wherein at least a portion of the third tributary comprises a third watermark symbol, the third tributary having been produced by embedding the third watermark symbol in the at least one watermark symbol interval within the uncompressed host content and compressing at least portions of the host content embedded with the third watermark symbol thereafter using the particular compression algorithm.
  • 17. The method of claim 10, wherein the code comprises a sequence of logical values; andselecting at least one segment from each of the first and at least the second tributaries comprises selecting a first segment from the first tributary to represent a first logical value within the sequence of logical values and selecting a second segment from the second tributary to represent a second logical value, different from the first logical value, within the sequence of logical values.
  • 18. The method of claim 10, wherein one or more of the first tributary and the at least the second tributary comprises less than all segments of the host content.
  • 19. A device, comprising: an embedder configured to: select a watermark interval for embedding watermark symbols within a host content, wherein the watermark symbol interval spans an integer multiple of compression units of a particular compression algorithm,obtain at least a portion of the host content in uncompressed format, andembed a first watermark symbol in at least one watermark symbol interval within the uncompressed host content;a compressor configured to compress at least the portions of the host content embedded with the first watermark symbol to produce a first tributary; anda storage unit configured to store at least a portion of the first tributary and at least a portion of at least a second tributary.
  • 20. The device of claim 19, wherein the compressor is configured to compress the host content using a compression algorithm selected from a group of compression algorithms consisting of: H.264, AAC, AACplus, MP3, JPEG, JPEG2000 and MPEG.
  • 21. The device of claim 19, wherein the host content is one of: a still image, a video content or an audio content.
  • 22. The device of claim 19, wherein the watermark symbol interval corresponds to one or more of: a duration of the host content in uncompressed format;a spatial extent of the host content in uncompressed format;a combination of spatial and temporal extent of the host content in uncompressed format; oran extent of the host content in a frequency domain in uncompressed format.
  • 23. The device of claim 19, wherein the compressor is configured to produce the second tributary by compressing an unmarked version of the host content.
  • 24. The device of claim 19, wherein embedder is configured to embed a second watermark symbol in the at least one watermark symbol interval within the uncompressed host content, and the compressor is configured to compress at least the portions of the host content embedded with the second watermark symbol to produce the second tributary.
  • 25. The device of claim 24, wherein embedder is configured to embed a third watermark symbol in the at least one watermark symbol interval within the uncompressed host content, and the compressor is configured to compress at least the portions of the host content embedded with the third watermark symbol to produce the third tributary.
  • 26. The device of claim 19, wherein one or more of the first tributary or the at least the second tributary comprises less than all segments of the host content.
  • 27. A device, comprising: a multiplexer configured to access a first and at least a second tributary, the first tributary having been produced by embedding a first watermark symbol within an uncompressed version of the host content in at least a first watermark symbol interval and compressing at least the embedded portions of the host content thereafter according to a particular compression format, the first watermark symbol interval spanning an integer number of compression units of the particular compression algorithm; anda selector configured to select at least one segment from each of the first and at least the second tributaries based on a code, wherein each of the selected segments spans an integer number of compression units of the particular compression algorithm;the multiplexer further configured to assemble the selected segments, without decompressing the selected segments, to produce a marked content.
  • 28. The device of claim 27, wherein the particular compression algorithm is selected from a group of compression algorithms consisting of: H.264, AAC, AACplus, MP3, JPEG, JPEG2000 and MPEG.
  • 29. The device of claim 27, wherein the marked content is one of: a still image, a video content or an audio content.
  • 30. The device of claim 27, wherein the first watermark interval corresponds to one or more of: a duration of the host content in uncompressed format;a spatial extent of the host content in uncompressed format;a combination of spatial and temporal extent of the host content in uncompressed format; oran extent of the host content in a frequency domain in uncompressed format.
  • 31. The device of claim 27, wherein the second tributary is an unmarked version of the host content in compressed format.
  • 32. The device of claim 27, wherein at least a portion of the second tributary comprises a second watermark symbol, the second tributary having been produced by embedding the second watermark symbol in the at least one watermark symbol interval within the uncompressed host content and compressing at least the portions of the host content embedded with the second watermark symbol thereafter using the particular compression algorithm.
  • 33. The device of claim 32, wherein the multiplexer is configured to access a third tributary, wherein at least a portion of the third tributary comprises a third watermark symbol, the third tributary having been produced by embedding the third watermark symbol in the at least one watermark symbol interval within the uncompressed host content and compressing at least the portions of the host content embedded with the third watermark symbol thereafter using the particular compression algorithm.
  • 34. The device of claim 27, wherein the code comprises a sequence of logical values; andthe selector is configured to select a first segment from the first tributary to represent a first logical value within the sequence of logical values and selecting a second segment from the second tributary to represent a second logical value, different from the first logical value, within the sequence of logical values.
  • 35. The device of claim 27, wherein one or more of the first tributary or the at least the second tributary comprises less than all segments of the host content.
  • 36. A computer program product, embodied on a non-transitory computer readable medium, the computer program product comprising: computer code for selecting a watermark symbol interval for embedding watermark symbols within a host content, wherein the watermark symbol interval spans an integer multiple of compression units of a particular compression algorithm;computer code for obtaining at least a portion of the host content in uncompressed format;computer code for producing a first tributary by embedding a first watermark symbol in at least one watermark symbol interval within the uncompressed host content and compressing at least the embedded portions of the host content thereafter using the particular compression algorithm; andcomputer code for making the first tributary and at least a second tributary available to one of a content handling device or a computer readable storage medium.
  • 37. A computer program product, embodied on a non-transitory computer readable medium, the computer program product comprising: computer code for accessing a first and at least a second tributary, the first tributary having been produced by embedding a first watermark symbol within an uncompressed version of the host content in at least a first watermark symbol interval and compressing at least the embedded portions of the host content thereafter according to a particular compression format, the first watermark symbol interval spanning an integer number of compression units of the particular compression algorithm;computer code for selecting at least one segment from each of the first and at least the second tributaries based on a code, wherein each of the selected segments spans an integer number of compression units of the particular compression algorithm; andcomputer code for assembling the selected segments at the marking device, without decompressing the selected segments, to produce a marked content.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This patent application is a continuation application of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/567,792, filed Aug. 6, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/488,397, filed Jun. 19, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,259,938, which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/075,289 filed on Jun. 24, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (500)
Number Name Date Kind
3406344 Hopper Oct 1968 A
3842196 Loughlin Oct 1974 A
3885217 Cintron May 1975 A
3894190 Gassmann Jul 1975 A
3919479 Moon et al. Nov 1975 A
3973206 Haselwood et al. Aug 1976 A
4048562 Haselwood et al. Sep 1977 A
4176379 Wessler et al. Nov 1979 A
4199788 Tsujimura Apr 1980 A
4225967 Miwa et al. Sep 1980 A
4230990 Lert, Jr. et al. Oct 1980 A
4281217 Dolby Jul 1981 A
4295128 Hashemian et al. Oct 1981 A
4425578 Haselwood et al. Jan 1984 A
4454610 Sziklai Jun 1984 A
4464656 Nakamura Aug 1984 A
4497060 Yang Jan 1985 A
4512013 Nash et al. Apr 1985 A
4547804 Greenberg Oct 1985 A
4564862 Cohen Jan 1986 A
4593904 Graves Jun 1986 A
4639779 Greenberg Jan 1987 A
4669089 Gahagan et al. May 1987 A
4677466 Lert, Jr. et al. Jun 1987 A
4686707 Iwasaki et al. Aug 1987 A
4703476 Howard Oct 1987 A
4706282 Knowd Nov 1987 A
4723302 Fulmer et al. Feb 1988 A
4729398 Benson et al. Mar 1988 A
4739398 Thomas et al. Apr 1988 A
4750173 Bluthgen Jun 1988 A
4755871 Morales-Garza et al. Jul 1988 A
4755884 Efron et al. Jul 1988 A
4764608 Masuzawa et al. Aug 1988 A
4764808 Solar Aug 1988 A
4789863 Bush Dec 1988 A
4805020 Greenberg Feb 1989 A
4807013 Manocha Feb 1989 A
4807031 Broughton et al. Feb 1989 A
4840602 Rose Jun 1989 A
4843562 Kenyon et al. Jun 1989 A
4876617 Best et al. Oct 1989 A
4876736 Kiewit Oct 1989 A
4930011 Kiewit May 1990 A
4931871 Kramer Jun 1990 A
4937807 Weitz et al. Jun 1990 A
4939515 Adelson Jul 1990 A
4943963 Waechter et al. Jul 1990 A
4945412 Kramer Jul 1990 A
4967273 Greenberg Oct 1990 A
4969041 O'Grady et al. Nov 1990 A
4972471 Gross et al. Nov 1990 A
4972503 Zurlinden Nov 1990 A
4979210 Nagata et al. Dec 1990 A
5057915 Von Kohorn Oct 1991 A
5073925 Nagata et al. Dec 1991 A
5080479 Rosenberg Jan 1992 A
5113437 Best et al. May 1992 A
5116437 Yamamoto et al. May 1992 A
5161251 Mankovitz Nov 1992 A
5191615 Aldava et al. Mar 1993 A
5200822 Bronfin et al. Apr 1993 A
5210820 Kenyon May 1993 A
5210831 Emma et al. May 1993 A
5213337 Sherman May 1993 A
5214792 Alwadish May 1993 A
5237611 Rasmussen et al. Aug 1993 A
5251041 Young et al. Oct 1993 A
5270480 Hikawa Dec 1993 A
5294962 Sato et al. Mar 1994 A
5294982 Salomon et al. Mar 1994 A
5319453 Copriviza et al. Jun 1994 A
5319735 Preuss et al. Jun 1994 A
5351304 Yamamoto Sep 1994 A
5379345 Greenberg Jan 1995 A
5402488 Karlock Mar 1995 A
5404160 Schober et al. Apr 1995 A
5404377 Moses Apr 1995 A
5408258 Kolessar Apr 1995 A
5414729 Fenton May 1995 A
5424785 Orphan Jun 1995 A
5425100 Thomas et al. Jun 1995 A
5432799 Shimpuku et al. Jul 1995 A
5436653 Ellis et al. Jul 1995 A
5450490 Jensen et al. Sep 1995 A
5452901 Nakada et al. Sep 1995 A
5473631 Moses Dec 1995 A
5481294 Thomas et al. Jan 1996 A
5497372 Nankoh et al. Mar 1996 A
5502576 Ramsay et al. Mar 1996 A
5504518 Ellis et al. Apr 1996 A
5508754 Orphan Apr 1996 A
5519454 Willis May 1996 A
5526427 Thomas et al. Jun 1996 A
5537484 Kobayashi Jul 1996 A
5579124 Aijala et al. Nov 1996 A
5581658 O'Hagan et al. Dec 1996 A
5581800 Fardeau et al. Dec 1996 A
5592553 Guski et al. Jan 1997 A
5612729 Ellis et al. Mar 1997 A
5613004 Cooperman et al. Mar 1997 A
5636292 Rhoads Jun 1997 A
5664018 Leighton Sep 1997 A
5687191 Lee et al. Nov 1997 A
5687236 Moskowitz et al. Nov 1997 A
5699427 Chow et al. Dec 1997 A
5719619 Hattori et al. Feb 1998 A
5719937 Warren et al. Feb 1998 A
5737329 Horiguchi Apr 1998 A
5752880 Gabai et al. May 1998 A
5761606 Wolzien Jun 1998 A
5764763 Jensen et al. Jun 1998 A
5778108 Coleman, Jr. Jul 1998 A
5787334 Fardeau et al. Jul 1998 A
5805635 Andrews, Jr. et al. Sep 1998 A
5809064 Fenton et al. Sep 1998 A
5819289 Sanford, II et al. Oct 1998 A
5822360 Lee et al. Oct 1998 A
5822432 Moskowitz et al. Oct 1998 A
5825892 Braudaway et al. Oct 1998 A
5828325 Wolosewicz et al. Oct 1998 A
5832119 Rhoads Nov 1998 A
5841978 Rhoads Nov 1998 A
5848155 Cox Dec 1998 A
5850249 Massetti et al. Dec 1998 A
5850481 Rhoads Dec 1998 A
5862260 Rhoads Jan 1999 A
5887243 Harvey et al. Mar 1999 A
5889868 Moskowitz et al. Mar 1999 A
5892900 Ginter et al. Apr 1999 A
5893067 Bender et al. Apr 1999 A
5901178 Lee et al. May 1999 A
5905800 Moskowitz et al. May 1999 A
5930369 Cox et al. Jul 1999 A
5933798 Linnartz Aug 1999 A
5937000 Lee et al. Aug 1999 A
5940124 Janko et al. Aug 1999 A
5940134 Wirtz Aug 1999 A
5940135 Petrovic et al. Aug 1999 A
5940429 Lam et al. Aug 1999 A
5943422 Van Wie et al. Aug 1999 A
5945932 Smith et al. Aug 1999 A
5949885 Leighton Sep 1999 A
5960081 Vynne et al. Sep 1999 A
5963909 Warren et al. Oct 1999 A
5986692 Logan et al. Nov 1999 A
6021432 Sizer, II et al. Feb 2000 A
6031914 Tewfik et al. Feb 2000 A
6035171 Takaya et al. Mar 2000 A
6035177 Moses et al. Mar 2000 A
6044156 Honsinger et al. Mar 2000 A
6061793 Tewfik et al. May 2000 A
6067440 Diefes May 2000 A
6078664 Moskowitz et al. Jun 2000 A
6094228 Ciardullo et al. Jul 2000 A
6101310 Terada et al. Aug 2000 A
6128597 Kolluru et al. Oct 2000 A
6145081 Winograd et al. Nov 2000 A
6154571 Cox et al. Nov 2000 A
6160986 Gabai et al. Dec 2000 A
6173271 Goodman et al. Jan 2001 B1
6175627 Petrovic et al. Jan 2001 B1
6189123 Anders Nystrom et al. Feb 2001 B1
6209092 Linnartz Mar 2001 B1
6209094 Levine et al. Mar 2001 B1
6222932 Rao et al. Apr 2001 B1
6229572 Ciardullo et al. May 2001 B1
6233347 Chen et al. May 2001 B1
6246775 Nakamura et al. Jun 2001 B1
6246802 Fujihara et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249870 Kobayashi et al. Jun 2001 B1
6252972 Linnartz Jun 2001 B1
6253113 Lu Jun 2001 B1
6253189 Feezell et al. Jun 2001 B1
6268866 Shibata Jul 2001 B1
6278792 Cox et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282299 Tewfik et al. Aug 2001 B1
6285774 Schumann et al. Sep 2001 B1
6289108 Rhoads Sep 2001 B1
6290566 Gabai et al. Sep 2001 B1
6330335 Rhoads Dec 2001 B1
6330672 Shur Dec 2001 B1
6332031 Rhoads et al. Dec 2001 B1
6332194 Bloom et al. Dec 2001 B1
6353672 Rhoads Mar 2002 B1
6363159 Rhoads Mar 2002 B1
6373974 Zeng Apr 2002 B2
6374036 Ryan et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381341 Rhoads Apr 2002 B1
6385330 Powell et al. May 2002 B1
6388712 Shinohara et al. May 2002 B1
6389152 Nakamura et al. May 2002 B2
6389538 Gruse et al. May 2002 B1
6400826 Chen et al. Jun 2002 B1
6400827 Rhoads Jun 2002 B1
6404781 Kawamae et al. Jun 2002 B1
6404898 Rhoads Jun 2002 B1
6411725 Rhoads Jun 2002 B1
6415040 Linnartz et al. Jul 2002 B1
6415041 Oami et al. Jul 2002 B1
6424726 Nakano et al. Jul 2002 B2
6427012 Petrovic Jul 2002 B1
6430301 Petrovic Aug 2002 B1
6430302 Rhoads Aug 2002 B2
6449367 Van Wie et al. Sep 2002 B2
6449496 Beith et al. Sep 2002 B1
6473560 Linnartz et al. Oct 2002 B1
6477431 Kalker et al. Nov 2002 B1
6487301 Zhao Nov 2002 B1
6490355 Epstein Dec 2002 B1
6496591 Rhoads Dec 2002 B1
6505160 Levy et al. Jan 2003 B1
6510233 Nakano Jan 2003 B1
6510234 Cox et al. Jan 2003 B1
6512837 Ahmed Jan 2003 B1
6523113 Wehrenberg Feb 2003 B1
6529506 Yamamoto et al. Mar 2003 B1
6530021 Epstein et al. Mar 2003 B1
6550011 Sims, III Apr 2003 B1
6553127 Kurowski Apr 2003 B1
6556688 Ratnakar Apr 2003 B1
6557103 Boncelet, Jr. et al. Apr 2003 B1
6570996 Linnartz May 2003 B1
6571144 Moses et al. May 2003 B1
6574350 Rhoads et al. Jun 2003 B1
6577744 Braudaway et al. Jun 2003 B1
6584138 Neubauer et al. Jun 2003 B1
6590996 Reed et al. Jul 2003 B1
6590997 Rhoads Jul 2003 B2
6591365 Cookson Jul 2003 B1
6592516 Lee Jul 2003 B2
6598162 Moskowitz Jul 2003 B1
6614914 Rhoads et al. Sep 2003 B1
6618484 Weber et al. Sep 2003 B1
6625297 Bradley Sep 2003 B1
6633653 Hobson et al. Oct 2003 B1
6636615 Rhoads et al. Oct 2003 B1
6647128 Rhoads Nov 2003 B1
6647129 Rhoads Nov 2003 B2
6654501 Acharya et al. Nov 2003 B1
6661905 Chupp et al. Dec 2003 B1
6665419 Oami Dec 2003 B1
6668068 Hashimoto Dec 2003 B2
6671376 Koto et al. Dec 2003 B1
6671388 Op De Beeck et al. Dec 2003 B1
6674861 Xu et al. Jan 2004 B1
6674876 Hannigan et al. Jan 2004 B1
6675146 Rhoads Jan 2004 B2
6678389 Sun et al. Jan 2004 B1
6681029 Rhoads Jan 2004 B1
6683958 Petrovic Jan 2004 B2
6697944 Jones et al. Feb 2004 B1
6700990 Rhoads Mar 2004 B1
6704431 Ogawa et al. Mar 2004 B1
6707926 Macy et al. Mar 2004 B1
6728390 Rhoads et al. Apr 2004 B2
6737957 Petrovic et al. May 2004 B1
6738495 Rhoads et al. May 2004 B2
6744906 Rhoads et al. Jun 2004 B2
6748360 Pitman et al. Jun 2004 B2
6751337 Tewfik et al. Jun 2004 B2
6757908 Vogel Jun 2004 B1
6768807 Muratani Jul 2004 B1
6771797 Ahmed Aug 2004 B2
6785399 Fujihara Aug 2004 B2
6785401 Walker et al. Aug 2004 B2
6785815 Serret-Avila et al. Aug 2004 B1
6792542 Lee et al. Sep 2004 B1
6798893 Tanaka Sep 2004 B1
6829368 Meyer et al. Dec 2004 B2
6834344 Aggarwal et al. Dec 2004 B1
6834345 Bloom et al. Dec 2004 B2
6850626 Rhoads et al. Feb 2005 B2
6856693 Miller Feb 2005 B2
6880082 Ohta Apr 2005 B2
6888943 Lam et al. May 2005 B1
6891958 Kirovski et al. May 2005 B2
6912010 Baker et al. Jun 2005 B2
6912294 Wang et al. Jun 2005 B2
6912315 Wong et al. Jun 2005 B1
6915002 Gustafson Jul 2005 B2
6915422 Nakamura Jul 2005 B1
6915481 Tewfik et al. Jul 2005 B1
6931536 Hollar Aug 2005 B2
6944313 Donescu Sep 2005 B1
6947893 Iwaki et al. Sep 2005 B1
6952774 Kirovski et al. Oct 2005 B1
6961854 Serret-Avila et al. Nov 2005 B2
6973195 Matsui Dec 2005 B1
6993154 Brunk Jan 2006 B2
6996249 Miller et al. Feb 2006 B2
7007166 Moskowitz et al. Feb 2006 B1
7020304 Alattar et al. Mar 2006 B2
7024018 Petrovic Apr 2006 B2
7043049 Kuzma May 2006 B2
7043536 Philyaw et al. May 2006 B1
7046808 Metois et al. May 2006 B1
7054461 Zeller et al. May 2006 B2
7054462 Rhoads et al. May 2006 B2
7058815 Morin Jun 2006 B2
7068809 Stach Jun 2006 B2
7072492 Ogawa et al. Jul 2006 B2
7103678 Asai et al. Sep 2006 B2
7107452 Serret-Avila et al. Sep 2006 B2
7142691 Levy Nov 2006 B2
7162642 Schumann et al. Jan 2007 B2
7164778 Nakamura et al. Jan 2007 B1
7167599 Diehl Jan 2007 B1
7171020 Rhoads et al. Jan 2007 B2
7177429 Moskowitz et al. Feb 2007 B2
7197368 Kirovski et al. Mar 2007 B2
7206649 Kirovski et al. Apr 2007 B2
7224819 Levy et al. May 2007 B2
7231061 Bradley Jun 2007 B2
7289643 Brunk et al. Oct 2007 B2
7298865 Lubin et al. Nov 2007 B2
7319759 Peinado et al. Jan 2008 B1
7321666 Kunisa Jan 2008 B2
7334247 Finseth et al. Feb 2008 B1
7336802 Kunisa Feb 2008 B2
7346514 Herre et al. Mar 2008 B2
7369677 Petrovic et al. May 2008 B2
7389421 Kirovski et al. Jun 2008 B2
7450727 Griesinger Nov 2008 B2
7454019 Williams Nov 2008 B2
7581103 Home et al. Aug 2009 B2
7616776 Petrovic et al. Nov 2009 B2
7630497 Lotspiech et al. Dec 2009 B2
7644282 Petrovic et al. Jan 2010 B2
7660991 Nakamura et al. Feb 2010 B2
7664332 Wong et al. Feb 2010 B2
7693297 Zhang et al. Apr 2010 B2
7788684 Petrovic et al. Aug 2010 B2
7840006 Ogawa et al. Nov 2010 B2
7983922 Neusinger et al. Jul 2011 B2
7986806 Rhoads Jul 2011 B2
7991995 Rabin et al. Aug 2011 B2
8055013 Levy et al. Nov 2011 B2
8059815 Lofgren et al. Nov 2011 B2
8155463 Wong et al. Apr 2012 B2
8346532 Chakra et al. Jan 2013 B2
20010001159 Ford May 2001 A1
20010021926 Schneck et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010022786 King et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010044899 Levy Nov 2001 A1
20020007403 Echizen et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020012443 Rhoads et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020033844 Levy et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020044659 Ohta Apr 2002 A1
20020052885 Levy May 2002 A1
20020053026 Hashimoto May 2002 A1
20020054089 Nicholas et al. May 2002 A1
20020080964 Stone et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020080976 Schreer Jun 2002 A1
20020082731 Pitman et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020095577 Nakamura et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020097873 Petrovic Jul 2002 A1
20020120849 McKinley et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020120854 LeVine et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020126842 Hollar Sep 2002 A1
20020126872 Brunk et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138734 David et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020154144 Lofgren et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020168087 Petrovic Nov 2002 A1
20020178368 Yin et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030009671 Yacobi et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030012403 Rhoads et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030021439 Lubin et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030021441 Levy et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028796 Roberts et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030031317 Epstein Feb 2003 A1
20030033321 Schrempp et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037075 Hannigan et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030053655 Barone et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030061489 Pelly et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030063747 Petrovic Apr 2003 A1
20030072468 Brunk et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030076955 Alve et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030078891 Capitant Apr 2003 A1
20030081809 Fridrich et al. May 2003 A1
20030112974 Levy Jun 2003 A1
20030112997 Ahmed Jun 2003 A1
20030115504 Holliman et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030131350 Peiffer et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030152225 Kunisa Aug 2003 A1
20030174862 Rhoads et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030177359 Bradley Sep 2003 A1
20030179901 Tian et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030185417 Alattar et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030187679 Odgers et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030188166 Pelly et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030190054 Troyansky et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030190055 Kalker et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030200438 Kirovski et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030223584 Bradley et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040005076 Hosaka et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040008864 Watson et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040009763 Stone et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040010692 Watson Jan 2004 A1
20040015400 Whymark Jan 2004 A1
20040025176 Franklin et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040028255 Miller Feb 2004 A1
20040042635 Epstein et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040042636 Oh Mar 2004 A1
20040073916 Petrovic et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078575 Morten et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088556 Weirauch May 2004 A1
20040091111 Levy et al. May 2004 A1
20040093202 Fischer et al. May 2004 A1
20040093523 Matsuzaki et al. May 2004 A1
20040098593 Muratani May 2004 A1
20040101160 Kunisa May 2004 A1
20040103293 Ryan May 2004 A1
20040133794 Kocher et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040151316 Petrovic Aug 2004 A1
20040169581 Petrovic et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040174996 Tewfik et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040202324 Yamaguchi et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040204943 Kirovski et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040216157 Shain et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040250078 Stach et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050008190 Levy et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050010779 Kobayashi et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050013462 Rhoads Jan 2005 A1
20050025332 Seroussi Feb 2005 A1
20050050332 Serret-Avila et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050071669 Medvinsky et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050120220 Oostveen et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050196051 Wong et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050202781 Steelberg et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050251683 Levy et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060005029 Petrovic et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060056653 Kunisa Mar 2006 A1
20060062426 Levy et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060104477 Isogai et al. May 2006 A1
20060227968 Chen et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060239501 Petrovic et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070003103 Lemma et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070005500 Steeves et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070039018 Saslow et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070100483 Kentish et al. May 2007 A1
20070110237 Tehranchi et al. May 2007 A1
20070143617 Farber et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070150418 Ben-Menahem et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070168673 Van Der Veen et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070177761 Levy Aug 2007 A1
20070192261 Kelkar et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070208711 Rhoads et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070223708 Villemoes et al. Sep 2007 A1
20080002854 Tehranchi et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080016360 Rodriguez et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080031463 Davis Feb 2008 A1
20080209219 Rhein Aug 2008 A1
20080310629 Van Der Veen et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080310673 Petrovic et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080313741 Alve et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090031134 Levy Jan 2009 A1
20090172405 Shiomi et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090262932 Petrovic Oct 2009 A1
20090326961 Petrovic et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100034513 Nakano et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100121608 Tian et al. May 2010 A1
20100146286 Petrovic et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100214307 Lee et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100226525 Levy et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100228857 Petrovic et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100287579 Petrovic et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100287609 Gonzalez et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110016172 Shah Jan 2011 A1
20110068898 Petrovic et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110091066 Alattar Apr 2011 A1
20110103444 Baum et al. May 2011 A1
20110123063 Delp et al. May 2011 A1
20110202687 Glitsch et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110209191 Shah Aug 2011 A1
20110219229 Cholas et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110225427 Wood et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110286625 Petrovic et al. Nov 2011 A1
20110293090 Ayaki et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110311056 Winograd Dec 2011 A1
20120017091 Petrovic et al. Jan 2012 A1
20120026393 Petrovic et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120072729 Winograd et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120072730 Winograd et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120072731 Winograd et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120084870 Petrovic Apr 2012 A1
20120130719 Petrovic et al. May 2012 A1
20120203556 Villette et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120300977 Petrovic et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130007462 Petrovic et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130011006 Petrovic et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130114847 Petrovic et al. May 2013 A1
20130114848 Petrovic et al. May 2013 A1
20130117570 Petrovic et al. May 2013 A1
20130117571 Petrovic et al. May 2013 A1
20130132727 Petrovic May 2013 A1
20130142382 Petrovic et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130151855 Petrovic et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130151856 Petrovic et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130152210 Petrovic et al. Jun 2013 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (85)
Number Date Country
2276638 Jan 2000 CA
282734 Sep 1988 EP
372601 Jun 1990 EP
581317 Feb 1994 EP
1137250 Sep 2001 EP
2166725 Mar 2010 EP
2260246 Apr 1993 GB
2292506 Feb 1996 GB
2363027 Dec 2001 GB
10-150548 Jun 1998 JP
11-086435 Mar 1999 JP
11-284516 Oct 1999 JP
11-346302 Dec 1999 JP
2000-069273 Mar 2000 JP
2000083159 Mar 2000 JP
2000-174628 Jun 2000 JP
2000163870 Jun 2000 JP
2000216981 Aug 2000 JP
2001022366 Jan 2001 JP
2001-119555 Apr 2001 JP
2001175270 Jun 2001 JP
2001-188549 Jul 2001 JP
2001-216763 Aug 2001 JP
2001-218006 Aug 2001 JP
2001245132 Sep 2001 JP
2001-312570 Nov 2001 JP
2001-527660 Dec 2001 JP
2002-010057 Jan 2002 JP
2002-024095 Jan 2002 JP
2002-027223 Jan 2002 JP
2002-091465 Mar 2002 JP
2002091712 Mar 2002 JP
2002135557 May 2002 JP
2002-165191 Jun 2002 JP
2002176614 Jun 2002 JP
2002-519916 Jul 2002 JP
2002-232693 Aug 2002 JP
2002232412 Aug 2002 JP
2002319924 Oct 2002 JP
2002354232 Dec 2002 JP
2003-008873 Jan 2003 JP
2003-039770 Feb 2003 JP
2003-091927 Mar 2003 JP
2003-230095 Aug 2003 JP
2003-244419 Aug 2003 JP
2003-283802 Oct 2003 JP
2003316556 Nov 2003 JP
2004-023786 Jan 2004 JP
2004070606 Mar 2004 JP
2004-163855 Jun 2004 JP
2004173237 Jun 2004 JP
2004-193843 Jul 2004 JP
2004194233 Jul 2004 JP
2004-328747 Nov 2004 JP
2005051733 Feb 2005 JP
2005525600 Aug 2005 JP
20080539669 Nov 2008 JP
20100272920 Dec 2010 JP
20100009384 Jan 2010 KR
94-10771 May 1994 WO
95-14289 May 1995 WO
97-09797 Mar 1997 WO
97-33391 Sep 1997 WO
98-53565 Nov 1998 WO
99-03340 Jan 1999 WO
99-39344 May 1999 WO
99-45706 Oct 1999 WO
99-62022 Dec 1999 WO
00-00969 Jan 2000 WO
00-13136 Mar 2000 WO
00-56059 Sep 2000 WO
01-54035 Jul 2001 WO
01-55889 Aug 2001 WO
0197128 Dec 2001 WO
0219589 Mar 2002 WO
0223883 Mar 2002 WO
0249363 Jun 2002 WO
0295727 Nov 2002 WO
03052598 Jun 2003 WO
2005-027501 Mar 2005 WO
2005038778 Apr 2005 WO
2006051043 May 2006 WO
2006116394 Nov 2006 WO
2010073236 Jul 2010 WO
2013067439 May 2013 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (101)
Entry
Zhao, J., “Applying digital watermarking techniques to online multimedia commerce,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Imaging Science, Systems and Applications (CISSA'97), Jun./Jul. 1997 (7 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 18, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/063431, filed Nov. 2, 2012 (10 pages).
Jacobsmeyer, J., et al., “Introduction to error-control coding,” Pericle Communications Company, 2004 (16 pages).
Kalker, T., et al., “A security risk for publicly available watermark detectors,” Proc. Benelux Info. Theory Symp., Veldhoven, The Netherlands, May 1998 (7 pages).
Kalker, T., et al., “System issues in digital image and video watermarking for copy protection,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia Computing and Systems, pp. 562-567, Jun. 1999.
Kang, X., et al., “A DWT-DFT composite watermarking scheme robust to both affine transform and JPEG compression,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 8(13):776-786 Aug. 2003.
Kim, T.Y., et al., “An asymmetric watermarking system with many embedding watermarks corresponding to one detection watermark,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 3(11):375-377, Mar. 2004.
Kirovski, D., et al., “Multimedia content screening using a dual watermarking and fingerprinting system,” Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference, pp. 372-381, 2002.
Kirovski, D., et al., “Randomizing the replacement attack,” ICASSP, pp. 381-384, 2004.
Kirovski, D., et al., “Robust spread-spectrum audio watermarking,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 3:1345-1348, 2001.
Kirovski, D., et al., “Multimedia content screening using a dual watermarking and fingerprinting system,” Multimedia '02 Proceedings of the ACM international conference on Multimedia, 2002 (11 pages).
Kocher, P., et al., “Self-Protecting Digital Content: A Technical Report from the CRI Content Security Research Initiative,” Cryptography Research, Inc. (CRI), 2002-2003 (14 pages).
Kutter, M., et al., “The watermark copy attack,” Proc. of the SPIE: Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Content II, 3971:1-10, Jan. 2000.
Kuznetsov, A.V., et al., “An error correcting scheme for defective memory,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 6(4):712-718, Nov. 1978 (7 pages).
Lacy, J., et al., “Intellectual property protection systems and digital watermarking,” Proceedings: Information Hiding, Second International Workshop, Portland, Oregon, pp. 158-168, 1998.
Lin, E.T., et al., “Detection of image alterations using semi-fragile watermarks,” Proceedings of the SPIE International Conference on Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents II, Jan. 2000 (12 pages).
Lin, P.L., et al., “Robust transparent image watermarking system with spatial mechanisms,” The Journal of Systems and Software, 50:107-116, Feb. 2000.
Lotspeich, J., “The Advanced Access Content System's Use of Digital Watermarking,” MCPS '06, Oct. 28, 2006, pp. 19-21.
Lu, C.S., et al., “Oblivious cocktail watermarking by sparse code shrinkage: A regional-and global-based scheme,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 4(2):209-224, Dec. 2000.
Maehara, F., et al., “A proposal of multimedial home education terminal system based on flash-squeak OS,” Technical report of the institute of image information and television engineers, 28(43):21-24, Jul. 2004.
Mason, A. J., et al., “User requirements for watermarking in broadcast applications,” IEEE Conference Publication, International Broadcasting Convention (BC 2000), Amsterdam, Sep. 8-12, 2000 (7 pages).
Mintzer, F., et al., “If one watermark is good, are more better?,” Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP, 4:2067-2069, Mar. 1999.
Mobasseri, B.G., et al. “Content authentication and tamper detection in digital video,” Image Processing Proceedings, International Conference, 1:458-461, 2000.
Moulin, P., et al., “Detection-theoretic analysis of desynchronization attacks in watermarking, ” Technical Report MSR-TR-2002-24, Microsoft Corporation, Mar. 2002.
Muranoi, R., et al., “Video retrieval method using shotID for copyright protection systems,” Proc. SPIE Multimedia Storage and Archiving Systems III, 3527:245-252, Nov. 1998.
Nikolaidis, N., et al., “Watermark detection: benchmarking perspectives,” 2002 IEEE Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2002 (4 pages).
Office Action dated Jul. 21, 2011 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-508985 (6 pages).
Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2008-508985 (8 pages).
Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2011 for European Patent Application No. 03774648.4 (6 pages).
Office Action dated May 8, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-522802 (4 pages).
Office Action dated Nov. 26, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-114667 (8 pages).
Office Action dated Nov. 28, 2012 for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-114666 (8 pages).
Park, J.H., et al., “Robust and fragile watermarking techniques for documents using bidirectional diagonal profiles,” Information and Communications Security: Third International Conference, Xian, China, Nov. 2001, pp. 483-494.
Perez-Gonzalez, F., et al., “Approaching the capacity limit in image watermarking a perspective on coding techniques for data hiding applications,” Signal Processing, 6(81):1215-1238 Jun. 2001.
Petitcolas, F., et al., “The blind pattern matching attack on watermark systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, Apr. 2003 (4 pages).
Petitcolas, F.A.P., et al., “Attacks on copyright marking systems,” Second Workshop on Information Hiding, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Portland, Oregon, pp. 218-238, Apr. 1998.
Philips Research Liquid Audio Fraunhofer Institute, “Digital Audio Screening Technology for Phased Rollout,” Version 1.00, May 1999 (38 pages).
Pytlak, J.,“Anti-piracy coding,” URL: http://www.tele.com/pipermail/tig/2003-November/003842.html; Nov. 2003 (2 pages).
RSA Laboratories, “Frequently asked questions about today's cryptography,” Version 4.1, May 2000 (37 pages).
Schneier, B., “Applied cryptography, second edition: protocols, algorithms and source code in C,” Oct. 1995 (10 pages).
Seok, J., et al., “A novel audio watermarking algorithm for copyright protection of digital audio,” ETRI Journal, 24 (3):181-189, Jun. 2002.
Shih, F.Y., et al., “Combinational, image watermarking in the spatial and frequency domains,” Pattern Recognition, 36:696-975, May 2002.
Solanki, K., et al., “Robust image-adaptive data hiding: modeling, source coding and channel coding”, 41st Allerton Conference on Communications, Control and Computing, Oct. 2003 (10 pages).
Steinebach, M., et al., “Stir Mark benchmark: audio watermarking attacks,” International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing (ITCC 2001), Las Vegas, Nevada, Apr. 2001 (6 pages).
Tanaka, K., et al., “Secret transmission method of character data in motion picture communication,” SPIE Visual Communications and Image Processing '91, 1605:646-649, 1991.
Tsai, M.J., et al., “Wavelet packet and adaptive spatial transformation of watermark for digital image authentication,” IEEE Image Processing, 2000 International Conference, 1:450-453, 2000 (4 pages).
Verance Corporation, “Confirmedia,” PowerPoint presentation made to National Association of Broadcasters; Apr. 24, 2001 (40 pages).
Wolfgang, R., et al., “Perceptual watermarks for digital images and video,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 87 (7):1108-1126, Jul. 1999.
Xu, C., et al., “Applications of digital watermarking technology in audio signals,” Journal of Audio Eng. Soc., 10 (47):805-812, Oct. 1999.
Yeung, M. M., et al., “An invisible watermarking technique for image verification,” Image Processing, International Conference Proceedings, 2:680-683, Oct. 26-29 1997.
Zhao, J., “A WWW service to embed and prove digital copyright watermarks,” Proc. European Conf. on Multimedia Applications, Services and Techniques (ECMAST'96), May 1996 (15 pages).
“Advanced Access Content System (AACS), Pre-recorded Video Book,” Revision 0.951, Sep. 2009 (86 pages).
“Content Protection—Self Protecting Digital Content,” http://www.cryptography.com/technology/spdc/index.html, May 2010 (1 page).
“Microsoft response to CfP for technology solutions to screen digital audio content for LCM acceptance,” Microsoft Corporation, May 23, 1999 (9 pages).
“Task AC122-copy protection for distribution services,” Http://acad.bg/WISE/english/rd/partners/acts/areal/ac122-t.html, Jul. 1, 1997 (2 pages).
Adelsbach, A., et al., “Proving Ownership of Digital Content,” Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Information Hiding, 1768:117-133, Sep. 1999.
Aggarwal, A., et al., “Multi-Layer Grid Embeddings,” Foundations of Computer Science, 26th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 85:186-196, Oct. 1985.
Aris Technologies, Inc. “Audio Watermarking System to Screen Digital Audio Content for LCM Acceptance,” May 1999 (17 pages).
Bangaleea, R., et al., “Performance improvement of spread spectrum spatial-domain watermarking scheme through diversity and attack characterisation,” IEEE Africon, pp. 293-298, 2002.
Barreto, P.S.L.M., et al. “Toward Secure Public-Key Blockwise Fragile Authentication Watermarking,” IEEE Proceedings Vision, Image, and Signal Processing, 149(2):57-62, Apr. 2002.
Boney, L., et al., “Digital Watermarks for Audio Signals,” Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Univ. of Minnesota, Mar. 1996 (4 pages).
Cappellini, V., et al. “Robust Frame-based Watermarking for Digital Video,” Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, Sep. 2001 (5 pages).
Caronni, G., “Assuring Ownership Rights for Digital Images,” Proceedings of reliable IT systems VIS 95, Vieweg Publishing Company, Germany, 1995 (10 pages).
Chen, B. et al., “Quantization index modulation: a class of provably good methods for digital watermarking and information embedding,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 47(4):1423-1443 May 2001.
Chou, J., et al., “A Robust Blind Watermarking Scheme based on Distributed Source Coding Principles,” Multimedial 2000 Proceedings of the eighth ACM international conference on multimedia, Los Angeles, California, 2000 (8 pages).
Chou, J., et al., “A Robust Optimization Solution to the Data Hiding Problem using Distributed Source Coding Principles,” Pro. SPIE, 3971, San Jose, California, Jan. 2000 (10 pages).
Cinea, Inc., “Forensic watermarking deterring video piracy,” 2004, (9 pages).; [http://www.cinea.com/whitepapers/forensic—watermarking.pdf].
Costa, M., “Writing on Dirty Paper,” IEEE Trans. on Info. Theory, 29(3):439-441, May 1983.
Cox, I. J., et al., “Some general methods for tampering with watermarks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 16(4): 587-593, May 1998.
Coxford, A., et al., “Advanced Mathematics: A Preparation for Calculus, Second Edition,” Harcourt Brace Jovanovish, Inc., 1978 (14 pages).
Das, et al., “Distributed Priority Queues on Hybercube Architectures,” IEEE, 1996, pp. 620-627.
Davidson, M.F., “Music File Filter,” Sony Music, New York, May 23, 1999 (2 pages).
Digimarc Corporation, “Digimarc Watermarking Guide,” 1999 (22 pages).
Dittmann, J., “Combining digital watermarks and collusion secure fingerprints for customer copy monitoring,” Proc. IEEE Seminar on Secure Images and Image Authentication, Apr. 2000 (6 pages).
Dittmann, J., et al., “Combining digital watermarks and collusion secure fingerprints for digital images,” Proc. SPIE 3657:171-182, Jan. 1999 (12 pages).
Epp, L.W., et al., “Generalized scattering matrices for unit cell characterization of grid amplifiers and device de-embedding,” IEEE, 2:1288-1291, Jun. 1995.
European Search Report dated Apr. 12, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 07836262.1 filed Jul. 25, 2007 (12 pages).
European Search Report dated Jul. 3, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 12150742.0, filed Oct. 7, 2003 (5 pages).
European Search Report dated Nov. 10, 2010 for European Patent Application No. 03774648.4, filed Oct. 7, 2003 (5 pages).
European Search Report dated Oct. 24, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 06758537.2, filed Apr. 21, 2006 (6 pages).
European Search Report dated Oct. 31, 2012 for European Patent Application No. 06758577.8, filed Apr. 25, 2006 (6 pages).
Furon, T., et al., “An asymmetric watermarking method,” IEEE Trans. Signal Processing, 4(51):981-995, Apr. 2003.
Guth, H.J. et al., “Error-and collusion-secure fingerprinting for digital data,” Proc. 3rd Int. Workshop on Information . Hiding, LNCS 1768:134-145, Sep./Oct. 1999.
Hartung, F., et al., “Digital watermarking of MPEG-2 coded video in the bitstream domain,” Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, 4:2621-2624, Apr. 1997.
Hartung, F., et al., “Watermarking of MPEG-2 encoded video without decoding and re-coding,” Proc. SPIE Multimedia Computing and Networking 97, 3020:264-274, Feb. 1997.
Hartung, F., et al., “Watermarking of uncompressed and compressed video,” Signal Processing, 3(66):283-301, May 1998.
Heegard, C., et al., “On the capacity of computer memory with defects,” IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, 5(IT-29):731-739, Sep. 1983.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 8, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/069306, filed Dec. 12, 2012 (12 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 25, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/069302, filed Dec. 12, 2012 (22 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Apr. 24, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/051857, filed Sep. 15, 2011 (9 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 14, 1998 for International Application No. PCT/US1998/009587, filed May 12, 1998 (3 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 22, 2007 for International Application No. PCT/US2006/031267, filed Aug. 9, 2006 (2 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 14, 2002 for International Application No. PCT/US2001/026505, filed Aug. 27, 2001 (2 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 28, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/066138, filed Nov. 20, 2012 (11 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 4, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2006/015615, filed Apr. 25, 2006 (5 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 14, 2013 for International Application No. PCT/US2012/069308, filed Dec. 12, 2012 (10 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 28, 2012 for International Application No. PCT/US2011/051855, filed Sep. 15, 2011 (8 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 13, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2006/025090, filed Jun. 27, 2006 (2 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 19, 2004 for International Application No. PCT/US2003/031816, filed Apr. 29, 2004 (3 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated May 29, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2006/015410, filed Apr. 21, 2006 (6 pages).
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 26, 2008 for International Application No. PCT/US2007/016812, filed Jul. 25, 2007 (6 pages).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130108101 A1 May 2013 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61075289 Jun 2008 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 13567792 Aug 2012 US
Child 13717449 US
Parent 12488397 Jun 2009 US
Child 13567792 US