The invention relates to the field of electronic design tools (EDAs) for integrated circuit (IC) design testing.
Integrated circuits may include analog and digital electronic circuits on a flat semiconductor substrate, such as a silicon (Si) wafer. Microscopic transistors are printed onto the substrate using photolithography techniques to produce complex circuits of billions of transistors in a very small area, making modern electronic circuit design using ICs both low cost and high performance. ICs are produced by assembly lines of factories, termed “foundries”, that have commoditized the production of ICs, such as complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) ICs. Digital ICs contain billions of transistors arranged in functional and/or logical units on the wafer, and are packaged in a metal, plastic, glass, ceramic casing, and/or the like.
ICs are tested during production against power/performance specifications, such as by using wafer tests, package tests, circuit tests, end-user device operational tests, and/or the like. For example, wafer testing may determine which ICs do not meet power/performance specifications on each wafer tested, and the underperforming ICs may be discarded. As another example, package/circuit/device testing may test the product operation prior to end-user use, and underperforming products/batches be discarded. As a further example, marketing, warranty, and maintenance statistics may reflect on the compliance between the requirements, specifications, design, and testing during product development. Each of these types of tests may produce lists of underperforming products that may be analyzed to improve the design of the next generation of products and increase the production yield.
Yield is a common metric in semiconductor manufacturing and test. It measures the percentage of ICs in a finished wafer or packaged batch of ICs that pass all tests and function properly. ICs that do not meet the power/performance specifications impact the yield, since they may eventually be discarded.
The foregoing examples of the related art and limitations related therewith are intended to be illustrative and not exclusive. Other limitations of the related art will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon a reading of the specification and a study of the figures.
The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described and illustrated in conjunction with systems, tools and methods which are meant to be exemplary and illustrative, not limiting in scope.
One embodiment provides a method comprising using at least one hardware processor for: running a Monte Carlo simulation of possible integrated circuit (IC) process variations of each of a plurality of IC cell types, wherein each of the plurality of IC cell types is defined by multiple specific transistors and multiple specific interconnects; based on the results of the Monte Carlo simulation, creating a library of IC cell types and their corresponding behavioral values for each of the possible IC process variations, and storing the library in a non-transient memory; receiving an IC design embodied as a digital file; correlating the received IC design with the library; and predicting a frequency distribution and a power distribution of ICs manufactured according to the IC design.
Another embodiment provides a method comprising using at least one hardware processor for: running a Monte Carlo simulation of possible integrated circuit (IC) process variations of each of a plurality of IC cell types, wherein each of the plurality of IC cell types is defined by multiple specific transistors and multiple specific interconnects; based on the results of the Monte Carlo simulation, creating a library of IC cell types and their corresponding behavioral values for each of the possible IC process variations, and storing the library in a non-transient memory; receiving an IC design embodied as a digital file; applying a path selection algorithm to the IC design, wherein the applying comprises: retrieving, from the library, behavioral values that pertain to cell types that exist in the IC design. In embodiments, the method further comprises running an electronic circuit simulation of possible IC process variations of paths in the IC design, based on the behavioral values retrieved from the library, to produce a ranked list of critical paths, out of the paths in the IC design and/or running an electronic circuit simulation of the IC design to identify possible IC process variations, based on the behavioral values retrieved from the library. In embodiments, the method further comprises identifying a ranked list of critical paths, out of the paths in the IC design, based on the behavioral values retrieved from the library. In embodiments, the method further comprises predicting a frequency distribution and/or a power distribution of ICs manufactured according to the IC design, based on the paths in the IC design.
In some embodiments, the behavioral values are values that affect at least one operational parameter of an IC manufactured based on the IC design, wherein the at least one operational parameter is selected from the group consisting of: voltage, current, delay, and frequency.
In some embodiments, the library of IC cell types comprises an operational model for each IC cell type. In some embodiments, the operational model for each IC cell type comprises aging degradation data. In some embodiments, the operational model for each IC cell type comprises a Static Timing Analysis (STA) model.
In some embodiments, the electronic circuit simulation is performed using SPICE (Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis).
In some embodiments, the method further comprises: receiving Post-Si data, derived from ICs manufactured according to the IC design; and adjusting the stored library based on the received data.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises: receiving an on-chip measurement from ICs manufactured according to the IC design; using the on-chip measurement as an input to an estimator, the Post-Si data being providing as an output from the estimator.
In some embodiments, the Post-Si data is derived from one or more on-chip sensors.
In some embodiments, the one or more on-chip sensors comprise at least one of: a timing-margin sensor; a delay sensor; a leakage sensor; a voltage sensor; and a thermal sensor.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises: manufacturing ICs according to the IC design; and setting one or more operational parameters of the manufactured ICs based on the stored library.
In some embodiments, the method further comprises: setting one or more manufacturing parameters based on the stored library; and manufacturing ICs according to the IC design and the manufacturing parameters.
Another embodiment provides a computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having program code embodied therewith, the program code executable by at least one hardware processor to perform the actions of any one of the preceding embodiments.
A further embodiment provides a system comprising: (a) a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having program code embodied therewith, the program code executable by at least one hardware processor to perform the actions of any one of the preceding embodiments; and (b) at least one hardware processor configured to execute the program code.
In addition to the exemplary aspects and embodiments described above, further aspects and embodiments will become apparent by reference to the figures and by study of the following detailed description.
Exemplary embodiments are illustrated in referenced figures. Dimensions of components and features shown in the figures are generally chosen for convenience and clarity of presentation and are not necessarily shown to scale. The figures are listed below.
Disclosed herein are devices, systems, computer program products, and methods for predicting, for example, the frequency and/or power distribution of a manufactured (Post-Si) logic integrated circuit (IC). Disclosed techniques may predict the logic paths within the IC that will limit its frequency, i.e. Critical Paths (CP). The prediction is done at the design stage (Pre-Si) for each Si-manufacturing point that is defined by the Si-manufacturing distribution. The techniques herein allow to predict, analyze, and determine the maximum-frequency (frequency binning) and power distribution (power binning) of a manufactured IC based on a given Si-manufacturing space. The techniques use Post-Si data as a feedback to improve its future analysis and prediction processes. The improvement impacts the quality (for example, in terms of yield) and time-to-market (TTM) of the current manufactured IC and future designs (of either the same version or new designs). The embodiment that is illustrated (as a system block diagram) in
1. An Electronic Design Automation (EDA) tool-set 100.
1.1. Lib-Sens: Library-Sensitivity explorer tool 110.
1.2. PSA: Path-Sensitivity-Analysis tool 120.
1.3. Production-View: Silicon production view at design: Yield-power/performance analysis tool, to reach decisions to reduce power/area, increase performance and/or expedite time to tape-out.
2. Sensors/Agents 210 that are an electrical circuit implemented on the die (IC).
3. Machine learning (ML) tools 130, 230 that are used to build Estimators/Functions that are used Pre-Si 101 and Post-Si 201 to estimate CP delays and power consumption of an IC using the readout from the Agents 210 as their argument.
4. Feedback from Post-Si 200 that is used to improve the Pre-Si prediction and analysis processes.
5. Post-Si design view (not shown), in order to generate parametric data only available at the IC design stage and re-recreate the decisions for power/performance binning reached at design stage.
EDA Tools—Termed “Lib Sense” 110
The Library sensitivity tool (Lib Sense) 110 is illustrated (as a block diagram) in
1. Product operating points 310, i.e. voltages & temperatures.
2. A library 320 of cells, foundation intellectual property cells, like standard cells and memories, including the netlist-data and Lay Out (LO) data for each of the cells in the library.
3. Process technology models 330 (including aging degradation data) of a certain process-technology that is characterized by the device types that are manufactured using the technology (i.e., process, fab, etc.). For example:
3.1. SVT-type: N or P devices manufactured with standard threshold voltage.
3.2. LVT-type: N or P devices manufactured with low threshold voltage.
3.3 ULVT-type: N or P devices manufactured with ultra-low threshold voltage.
The Lib Sense tool 110 operates a circuit-simulation engine/tool 150 (as shown in
To represent the cell-delay & cell-leakage vs. the Si-manufacturing space and input slope, the tool 110 operates circuit-simulation engine/tool 150 in a Monte-Carlo mode to characterize the cell per each Monte-Carlo point (MC-point). Using the MC data, the tool build a de-rate look-up table for each cell. The de-rate data is generated by factorization of each MC-data point with the data of a reference point. The reference point may represent the central manufacturing point, nominal operation voltage, and nominal operational temperature. The reference point may represent other manufacturing points for better accuracy at the manufacturing point of interest. Following is an example of a delay de-rate look-up table generated by the tool for a certain cell per a certain voltage and temperature. The example shows the de-rate values of one cell-arc (rise of a4 input to rising of output z) vs. a few MC points. This data is the data-base for the PSA and “Silicon production view at design” tools.
The look-up table data may use one or more conversions factors to increase the accuracy of other scenarios, such as different load (FO) or different input slope. Additionally or alternatively, the look-up table may include de-rate factors that represent aging-degradation.
EDA Tools—PSA 120
The objective of the PSA 120 is to identify Critical-Paths (CP) of an IC over the Si-manufacturing space. These paths will determine the die frequencies at each Si-manufacturing point. The tool generates a list of CPs that may determine the frequency over Si-manufacturing points. Referring to
The inputs for the PSA 120 are:
1. A list of candidate paths generated by a Static-Timing-Analysis (STA) process/EDA-tool and or like. Each path is described by a list of delay-arcs corresponds to a certain logic gate delay and/or Inter-Connect RC-delay.
2. A list of factorized reference arcs-delay generated by the Lib-Sense tool 110 (the de-rate table—
3. Process distribution data representing the Si-manufacturing-space.
PSA Process
Part A: Identify the CPs set:
1. Generating the Si-manufacturing space:
1.1 Computing the process distribution means values and covariance matrix based on the Process distribution data.
2. Sample dies from the Si-manufacturing-space based on:
2.2 Global process variation i.e. using the computed process means values and covariance matrix (mentioned at 1).
2.3 Local variation by sampling from a 2-dimensional mutual Gaussian distribution with sigma depends on the distance.
3. For each sample, the delay of each arc is estimated by a K-NN algorithm, using the 500 MC points. The K-NN may be tuned by cross-validation.
4. The delay of each path is the sum of the delays of the arcs contained in the path.
5. ∈1 is defined as the time difference to the slowest path, and δ1 as the probability to find it. For given ∈1 and δ1, the algorithm returns a set of paths such that at least one of these paths is ∈1-slowest in (1−δ1)×100% of the times.
Part B: Adding random variation:
6. Perform steps 1-5 above.
7. Duplicate each sample.
8. For each of the instances add random variation to each arc.
9. For each of the samples, compute the delay differences between the sample (with no random) to its instances (that include random).
10. Compute the differences mean value and sigma for each bin (group of samples with similar delays).
Random variation may be added also at part A, step 2.
EDA Tools—Production-View: Silicon Production View at Design
The “silicon production view at design” tool is used to analyze the Post-Si parametric yield of a die for a certain power/performance specification. The Post-Si data may arrive from different Post-Si stages, for example manufacturing and/or burn-in test. The “silicon production view at design” tool is a planning tool which allows to calculate the Post-Si parametric yield (compliance to power/performance specifications) with respect to a certain frequency/power binning at the Pre-Si stage.
The inputs for this tool are:
1. A list of critical paths (CPs) generated by a Static-Timing-Analysis (STA) process/EDA-tool or similar. Each path is described by a list of delay-arcs corresponding to a certain logic gate delay and/or Inter-Connect RC-delay.
2. A list of factorized Reference arcs-delays generated by the Lib-Sense tool. The list includes the delay distribution of each arc-delay in a certain standard cell over 500 MC points, a set of operating voltages, a set of operational temperatures and a set of aging conditions.
3. A list of foundation intellectual property cells, standard cells and memories (Foundation IPs), utilized in the IC digital implementation.
4. A list of factorized Reference leakage-current values per cell generated by the Lib-Sense tool.
5. Active-power generated by a power-analysis tool.
6. Process distribution data representing the Si-manufacturing-space.
This tool uses the CPs set (1) and the operational voltages and temperature sets to build a CP's delay. Timing traces from the STA will generate new STA models for a specific Monte-Carlo point, voltage point and temperature point. An example for a CP delay representation (i.e. some delay-arcs vs. MC point at a certain operational point) is shown in the table below:
This tool uses the list of foundation IPs instances utilized in the IC design to generate the leakage power data base.
The power database is the sum of leakage-power and the active-power. The total leakage power may be calculated by summing up the leakage power of all the foundation IP instances in the specific IC design. More details are described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/657,986, entitled “Integrated Circuit Profiling and Anomaly Detection”, filed Apr. 16, 2018 and International (PCT) Patent Application no. PCT/IL2019/050433, entitled “Integrated Circuit Profiling and Anomaly Detection”, filed Apr. 16 2019, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
For example, the total leakage of a specific IC design may be generated as the total leakage measurement as the sum of all cell's leakage:
Total leakage|PVT=V×Σall cellsIoff(i)|PVT
This tool first builds the frequency and/or power binning at the nominal operation point (for example, as shown with reference to
Three examples are shown with reference to
Sensors/Agents 210
These are circuits that are used to sense or measure a certain device parameter, a sub-circuit parameter, a die-level parameter, and/or the like. For example, a sensor measures the delay of a certain logic cell.
Following are examples of sensor/agent circuits (hereinafter, for simplicity, “sensors”).
A timing-margin sensor generates Margin Maps at many points in the IC.
A delay sensor may sense the delay of a certain logic cell. It may be implemented by a ring-oscillator circuit whose frequency reflects the average delay of the logic cells.
Another delay-sensor may sense the delay of the rising-edge of a certain logic cell and the falling-edge of a logic cell in a separate way.
A further delay sensor may sense the RC-delay per-metal or per a subset of metals and or like.
A leakage-sensor may be used to sense the leakage of a certain P-device and a certain N-device in separate ways, as described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/614,706, entitled “Integrated Circuit Sub-Threshold Leakage Sensor” and International (PCT) Patent Application no. PCT/IL2019/050039, filed Jan. 8, 2019, entitled “Integrated Circuit Workload, Temperature and/or Sub-Threshold Leakage Sensor”, both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
A voltage sensor may sense the absolute DC-voltage, or the instantaneous AC-voltage (negative peak, positive peak and peak-to-peak) of a point in the Si.
A Thermal sensor may sense the absolute temperature, or the instantaneous temperature (negative peak, positive peak, and peak-to-peak) of a point in the Si. Examples of a thermal sensor are discussed with reference to the leakage sensor mentioned above.
ML Tools—CP Estimator Generator 230
An estimator is a function and/or rule that converts between values (i.e., defines the relationships between the die operational values analytically, empirically, heuristically, etc.), such as using sensor values as input arguments to determine CPs delays, die power consumption, a profile (profile classifier), predicted High Coverage Measurement (HCM) values (HCM conversion function), predict manufacturing point, and/or the like. As used herein, the term “manufacturing point” means the set of parameters that determine the manufacturing of the IC design. Similar relationships may be found between HCM values and sensor values. The results of the die testing and analysis may better determine the specific dies that may operationally meet or exceed the engineering specifications.
Post-Si Feedback Data 200
When a certain die is tested, the tester reads values from its sensors. In addition, the IC is tested against an Fmax limit and power consumption (active-power and leakage-power-IDDQ) is actually measured from the IC for a specific production test.
The values from the sensors are used as an input data for:
1. The profiling-block described in the '986 application and corresponding PCT application. The profiling block classifies the die per its Si-manufacturing point.
2. The estimator block, which computes the Pre-Si CP's delay estimators, the die power consumption estimator, and the Si-manufacturing point using the sensor data as its arguments.
3. A direct parametric measurement, such as timing margin at many different areas in the IC.
The estimator block may generate one or more of the following outputs by the Post-Si estimators:
1. The die maximum frequency.
2. The die power consumption.
3. Die Si-manufacturing point.
Additional data generated by the sensors read, as a direct parametric measurement:
4. Die timing-margin map at many different points in the IC.
Post processing of 1, 2, 3 is used to build the die Post-Si frequency/power consumption-binning per Si manufacturing groups/families and interconnect models.
These, together with 4, create the “Design view at Post-Si stage”. This view generates data from design at Post-Si stage per device, as stated above, which until now is unavailable.
The following data, or a part thereof, is feedback to the Pre-Si processes per each die:
1. Post-Si CP's list.
2. Post-Si power consumption of the dies.
3. Die Si-manufacturing profile/point.
4. Post-Si CP's Fmax estimator results.
5. Post-Si Voltage-droop measurements and local hot-spots.
6. Post-Si timing-margin at many different points in the IC.
The feedback data allows to correlate Post-Si results with Pre-Si models, improve Pre-Si models and assumptions for further designs, and/or improve Post-Si tests, testing conditions and coverage.
Post-Si Binning and or Performance/Power Test Against Specification—Parametric Yield Improvements 140
At manufacturing-testing stage the Post-Si data (1-6), is used to actually perform the power/performance binning decisions as decided in the “Silicon production view at design” tool analysis. Providing the same visibility and good decision making both at design and as Post-Si stage, and maximizing the parametric yield according to the decisions taken in the design stage.
Timing-margin maps are used to analyze the IC behavior on different production tests, find “hot spots”, compare different production tests “stress” and coverage and use as a feedback to the Pre-Si models.
In a general sense, there may be considered a method operative on a hardware processor (or multiple hardware processors) comprising: running a Monte Carlo simulation of possible integrated circuit (IC) process variations of each of a plurality of IC cell types, wherein each of the plurality of IC cell types is defined by multiple specific transistors and multiple specific interconnects; based on the results of the Monte Carlo simulation, creating a library of IC cell types and their corresponding behavioral values for each of the possible IC process variations, and storing the library in a non-transient memory; and receiving an IC design at the hardware processor, particularly embodied as a digital file. The library of IC cell types advantageously comprises one or more models (such as one or more operational models) for each IC cell type. The Monte Carlo simulation may be implemented in accordance with one or more models of each of the plurality of IC cell types. Each model may include aging degradation data. The results of the Monte Carlo simulation may be de-rated, by factorization of each data point from the results of the Monte Carlo simulation with data of a respective reference point. The reference point may represent a central manufacturing point, nominal operation voltage, and nominal operational temperature, for example. The one or more models of each of the plurality of IC cell types may include a Static Timing Analysis (STA) model of each of the plurality of IC cell types.
In a first aspect, the method may further comprise: correlating the received IC design with the library; and predicting a frequency distribution and/or a power distribution of ICs manufactured according to the IC design. This approach may allow improved data regarding the manufacturing process to be obtained. The data may be fed back into the manufacturing process and/or operation of the manufactured ICs. This may be a form of product binning, in which ICs can be categorized in accordance with their characteristics. The binning is performed using Pre-Si (simulation and design) data, but Post-Si data (which may be derived from IC measurements) may additionally be used.
In a second aspect, the method may further comprise: applying a path selection algorithm to the IC design, wherein the applying comprises: retrieving, from the library, behavioral values that pertain to cell types that exist in the IC design. A result of the path selection algorithm may include a list of paths in the IC design and optionally an identification of critical paths. A Path-Sensitivity-Analysis (PSA) tool may thereby be provided. In embodiments, the method may further comprise: running an electronic circuit simulation (for example, using performed using Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis, SPICE) to produce possible IC process variations, based on the behavioral values retrieved from the library. A ranked list of critical paths may be identified, out of the paths in the IC design. In particular, the ranked list of critical paths may be based on the behavioral values retrieved from the library (the expended Lib data, especially at many MC points). Moreover, the ranked list of critical paths may be based on the STA model, allowing STA data to be expanded over the manufacturing process space. The CPs may then be used to improve the manufacturing process and/or operation of the manufactured ICs. For example, a frequency distribution and/or a power distribution of ICs manufactured according to the IC design may be predicted, based on the ranked list of critical paths (such as discussed above with respect to the first aspect).
According to any aspect, it may be considered that the behavioral values are values that affect at least one operational parameter of an IC manufactured based on the IC design. For example, the at least one operational parameter may be selected from the group consisting of: voltage, current, delay, and frequency.
In embodiments, Post-Si data may be used. For example, Post-Si data, derived from ICs manufactured according to the IC design, may be received. The stored library may be adjusted based on the received data. For instance, this may include one or more of: correlating Post-Si results with Pre-Si models; improving Pre-Si models and/or assumptions for further designs; and improving Post-Si tests, testing conditions and coverage.
In embodiments, an on-chip measurement may be received from ICs manufactured according to the IC design. Then, the on-chip measurement may be used as an input to an estimator. Post-Si data may be provided as an output from the estimator. The estimator may also use Pre-Si data (such as models and/or simulation data). An estimator may be used to provide CP delay information, for example.
The Post-Si data is derived from one or more on-chip sensors (such as agents, as discussed herein). The one or more on-chip sensors may comprise at least one of: a timing-margin sensor; a delay sensor; a leakage sensor (for example, based on a ring oscillator); a voltage sensor; and a thermal sensor.
In embodiments, one or more manufacturing parameters may be set based on the stored library, such as model data and/or behavioral values retrieved from the library (including information derived from the behavioral values such as the frequency distribution, power distribution and/or CPs). For example, this may result in a reduction in production times to achieve a specific frequency target. ICs may be manufactured according to the IC design and the manufacturing parameters accordingly.
In embodiments, the method may further comprise: manufacturing ICs according to the IC design. Then, one or more operational parameters (such as operational voltage and/or frequency) of the manufactured ICs may be set based on the stored library, such as model data and/or behavioral values retrieved from the library (including information derived from the behavioral values such as the frequency distribution, power distribution and/or CPs). For example, reducing the operational voltage of devices may reduce yield-loss in some circumstances. In such embodiments, the model data is beneficially improved or updated based on Post-Si data.
The present invention may be a system (which may include a manufacturing and/or testing apparatus), a method, and/or a computer program product. The computer program product may include computer readable program instructions for causing (or configured to cause) a processor to carry out aspects of the present invention. A computer readable storage medium (or media) may have the computer readable program instructions.
The computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that can retain and store instructions for use by an instruction execution device. The computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but is not limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, a semiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing. A non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of the computer readable storage medium includes the following: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device having instructions recorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing. A computer readable storage medium, as used herein, is not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagating through a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulses passing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmitted through a wire. Rather, the computer readable storage medium is a non-transient (i.e., not-volatile) medium.
Computer readable program instructions described herein can be downloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computer readable storage medium or to an external computer or external storage device via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network and/or a wireless network. The network may comprise copper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wireless transmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/or edge servers. A network adapter card or network interface in each computing/processing device receives computer readable program instructions from the network and forwards the computer readable program instructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium within the respective computing/processing device.
Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations of the present invention may be assembler instructions, instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions, machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions, state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, Smalltalk, C++ or the like, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages. The computer readable program instructions may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server. In the latter scenario, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider). In some embodiments, electronic circuitry including, for example, programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), or programmable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readable program instructions by utilizing state information of the computer readable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry, in order to perform aspects of the present invention.
Aspects of the present invention are described herein with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems), and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer readable program instructions.
These computer readable program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general-purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks. These computer readable program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can direct a computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the computer readable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises an article of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects of the function/act specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other device to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computer implemented process, such that the instructions which execute on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement the functions/acts specified in the flowchart and/or block diagram block or blocks.
The flowchart and block diagrams in the Figures illustrate the architecture, functionality, and operation of possible implementations of systems, methods, and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each block in the flowchart or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s). In some alternative implementations, the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved. It will also be noted that each block of the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagrams and/or flowchart illustration, can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or acts or carry out combinations of special purpose hardware and computer instructions.
The descriptions of the various embodiments of the present invention have been presented for purposes of illustration, but are not intended to be exhaustive or limited to the embodiments disclosed. Many modifications and variations will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the described embodiments. The terminology used herein was chosen to best explain the principles of the embodiments, the practical application or technical improvement over technologies found in the marketplace, or to enable others of ordinary skill in the art to understand the embodiments disclosed herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. National Patent application Ser. No. 17/254,468 filed on Dec. 21, 2020, which is a National Phase of PCT Patent Application No. PCT/IL2019/050686 having an International filing date of Jun. 19, 2019, entitled “EFFICIENT INTEGRATED CIRCUIT SIMULATION AND TESTING”, which claims the benefit of priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/686,744, filed Jun. 19, 2018, entitled “EFFICIENT INTEGRATED CIRCUIT SIMULATION AND TESTING.”. The contents of the above applications are all incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4555663 | Shimizu | Nov 1985 | A |
5548539 | Vlach et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5748509 | Fewster | May 1998 | A |
5774403 | Clark, II et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5818251 | Intrater | Oct 1998 | A |
5895629 | Russell et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5956497 | Ratzel | Sep 1999 | A |
5966527 | Krivokapic et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6172546 | Liu et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182253 | Lawrence et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6486716 | Minami et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6586921 | Sunter | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6683484 | Kueng et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6807503 | Ye et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6873926 | Diab | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6882172 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6948388 | Clayton et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7038483 | Suzuki et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7067335 | Weiner et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7254507 | Dosho et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7288958 | Takagi | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7369893 | Gunderson | May 2008 | B2 |
7443189 | Ramappa | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7455450 | Liu et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7501832 | Spuhler et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7649373 | Tokunaga | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7701246 | Plants et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7818601 | LaBerge | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7877657 | Miller et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7940862 | Tanaka et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8001512 | White | Aug 2011 | B1 |
8086978 | Zhang | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8170067 | Zerbe et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8275596 | Wason | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8279976 | Lin et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8310265 | Zjajo et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8365115 | Liu | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8418103 | Wang | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8479130 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2013 | B1 |
8633722 | Lai | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8825158 | Swerdlow | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8996937 | Jain et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9275706 | Tam | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9424952 | Seok et al. | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9490787 | Kho et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9536038 | Quinton et al. | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9564883 | Quinton et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9564884 | Quinton et al. | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9632126 | Yoon | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9714966 | Chen et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9760672 | Taneja et al. | Sep 2017 | B1 |
9791834 | Nassar et al. | Oct 2017 | B1 |
9954455 | Lin et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9977078 | Loke et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9991879 | Huang | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10490547 | Ali et al. | Nov 2019 | B1 |
10509104 | Dato | Dec 2019 | B1 |
10530347 | Tang | Jan 2020 | B2 |
11036266 | Srivastava et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11081193 | Tang | Aug 2021 | B1 |
11409323 | Herberholz et al. | Aug 2022 | B2 |
12013800 | Fayneh et al. | Jun 2024 | B1 |
20040009616 | Huisman et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015793 | Saxena et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040230385 | Bechhoefer et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230396 | Ye | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050053162 | Goishi | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050104175 | Itano et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050114056 | Patel et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050134350 | Huang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050134394 | Liu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154552 | Stroud et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050285646 | Rashid | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060049886 | Agostinelli, Jr. et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060224374 | Kwon et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070110199 | Momtaz et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070182456 | Agarwal et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070288183 | Bulkes et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080071489 | Wissel | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080074521 | Olsen | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080144243 | Mariani et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147355 | Fields et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080183409 | Roberts et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080186001 | Singh et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080186044 | Singh | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080216033 | Bucossi et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080231310 | Vijayaraghavan et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080262769 | Kadosh | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090027077 | Vijayaraghavan | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090076753 | Vijayaraghavan et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090096495 | Keigo | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090183043 | Niwa | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090222775 | Idgunji | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090230947 | Sumita | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090244998 | Kim | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090273550 | Vieri et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090278576 | Chakravarty | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090306953 | Liu | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100153896 | Sewall et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100251046 | Mizuno et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100253382 | Wang et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110093830 | Chen | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110102091 | Yeric | May 2011 | A1 |
20110109377 | Fujibe | May 2011 | A1 |
20110113298 | Van Den Eijnden | May 2011 | A1 |
20110169537 | Ma | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110175658 | Nomura | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110187433 | Baumann et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110267096 | Chlipala | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110295403 | Higuchi et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110315986 | Kaneda et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120025846 | Minas et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120038388 | Tseng et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120051395 | Chen et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120063524 | Stott et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120074973 | Baldwin et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120163074 | Franca-Neto et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120170616 | Tsai et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120187991 | Sathe | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120212246 | Benjamin et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120217976 | Clarkson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120221906 | Shetty et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120242490 | Ramaswami | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130088256 | Chlipala et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130226491 | Miguelanez, II | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130241690 | Wallace et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130293270 | Lee et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130335875 | Baumann | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140132293 | Abadir | May 2014 | A1 |
20140132315 | Sharma et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140143586 | Dalumi et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140184243 | Iyer et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140254734 | Abdelmoneum | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150061707 | Balasubramanian et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150077136 | Li | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150121158 | Wang et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150199223 | Banerjee et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150332451 | Amzaleg | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150355033 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150365049 | Ozawa | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160033574 | Serrer et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160042784 | Rim et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160072511 | Maekawa | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160087643 | Nozaki | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160125434 | Kohn et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160131708 | Huang et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160153840 | Huang et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160156176 | Kunz, Jr. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160164503 | Kim | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160203036 | Mezic et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160254804 | Meng | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170038265 | Abdelmoneum et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170093399 | Atkinson et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170160339 | Jenkins | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170179173 | Mandai et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170199089 | Fritchman et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170199228 | Hsieh et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170214516 | Rivaud et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170329391 | Jaffari | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170344102 | Kolla | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170345490 | Yoshimoto et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170364818 | Wu et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180034549 | Kikuchi | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180109245 | Takagi | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180183413 | Wong | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180365974 | Haas et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190019096 | Yoshida et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190117122 | Kurachi et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190305074 | Kande et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200028514 | Hanke | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200203333 | Chen et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200209070 | Tang et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20200313664 | Azam et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20220260630 | Fayneh et al. | Aug 2022 | A1 |
20220349935 | Fayneh et al. | Nov 2022 | A1 |
20230098071 | Chonnad et al. | Mar 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1886668 | Dec 2006 | CN |
101014991 | Aug 2007 | CN |
101241429 | Aug 2008 | CN |
101344898 | Jan 2009 | CN |
101915625 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102422169 | Nov 2014 | CN |
105210188 | Dec 2015 | CN |
106959400 | Jul 2017 | CN |
108534866 | Sep 2018 | CN |
113466670 | Oct 2021 | CN |
102007002253 | Jul 2007 | DE |
102014216786 | Oct 2015 | DE |
102012219971 | Jul 2016 | DE |
962991 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1262755 | Dec 2002 | EP |
2006784 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2060924 | May 2009 | EP |
2413150 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2770313 | Aug 2014 | EP |
102273077 | Sep 2014 | IN |
S57116228 | Jul 1982 | JP |
2000215693 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2002243800 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2008147245 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2009065533 | Mar 2009 | JP |
2012037238 | Feb 2012 | JP |
2009021348 | Jul 2013 | JP |
2016111563 | Jun 2016 | JP |
101232207 | Feb 2013 | KR |
2013110989 | Oct 2013 | KR |
20150073199 | Jun 2015 | KR |
200914841 | Apr 2009 | TW |
201614256 | Mar 2016 | TW |
201709669 | Mar 2017 | TW |
2005080099 | Sep 2005 | WO |
2013070218 | May 2013 | WO |
2013027739 | Mar 2015 | WO |
2019097516 | May 2019 | WO |
2019102467 | May 2019 | WO |
2019135247 | Jul 2019 | WO |
2019202595 | Oct 2019 | WO |
2019244154 | Dec 2019 | WO |
2020141516 | Jul 2020 | WO |
2020230130 | Nov 2020 | WO |
2021019539 | Feb 2021 | WO |
2021111444 | Jun 2021 | WO |
2021214562 | Oct 2021 | WO |
2022009199 | Jan 2022 | WO |
2022215076 | Oct 2022 | WO |
2023084528 | May 2023 | WO |
2023084529 | May 2023 | WO |
2023238128 | Dec 2023 | WO |
2024166103 | Aug 2024 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Vivek S Nandakumar et al, “Statistical static timing analysis flow for transistor level macros in a microprocessor”; 2010, 11th International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), pp. 163-170, Mar. 22, 2010. doi: 10.1109/ISQED.2010.5450412. |
Jing Li et al, “Variation Estimation and Compensation Technique in Scaled Ltps TFT Circuits for Low-Power Low-Cost Applications”; IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 28(1): 46-59, Jan. 1, 2009. doi: 10.1109/TCAD.2008.2009149. |
Xie Qing et al “Variation-Aware Joint Optimization of the Supply Voltage and Sleep Transistor Size for 7nm FinFET Technology”; 2014 IEEE 32nd international conference on computer design, pp. 380-385, Oct. 19, 2014. doi: 10.1109/ICCD.2014.6974709. |
Rebaud B et al , “Timing slack monitoring under process and environmental variations: Application to a DSP performance optimization”; Microelectronics Journal vol. 42 Issue 5, pp. 718-732, Feb. 8, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mejo.2011.02.005. |
Dierickx B et al, “Propagating variability from technology to system Level”; Physics of Semiconductor Devices, pp. 74-79, Dec. 16, 2007. doi: 10.1109/IWPSD.2007.4472457. |
Kan Takeuchi et al; “FEOL/BEOL wear-out estimator using stress-to-frequency conversion of voltage/temperature-sensitive ring oscillators for 28nm automotive MCUs”; IEEE, pp. 265-268, Oct. 20, 2016. Retrieved Aug. 3, 2021; DOI: 10.1109/ESSCIRC.2016.7598293. |
Kan Takeuchi et al; “Wear-out stress monitor utilising temperature and voltage sensitive ring oscillators” IET Circuits, Devices & Systems. vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 182-188, Jan. 15, 2018. Retrieved Aug. 3, 2021 from: https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/iet-cds.2017.0153. |
Kan Takeuchi et al; “Experimental Implementation of 8.9Kgate Stress Monitor in 28nm MCU along with Safety Software Library for IoT Device Maintenance”; IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS). Mar. 31, 2019; Retrieved Aug. 3, 2021 from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8720583. |
James P. Hofmeister, et al, “Ball Grid Array (BGA) Solder Joint Intermittency Detection: SJ BIST™”, IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, Apr. 2008, paper #1148, Version 1; Retrieved Aug. 3, 2021 from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224314758_Ball_Grid_Array_BGA_Solder_Joint_Intermittency_Detection_SJ_BIST. |
Paulheim H, Meusel R. “A decomposition of the outlier detection problem into a set of supervised learning problems”, Machine Learning, Sep. 2015, vol. 100 Issue 2, pp. 509-531. Retrieved Aug. 3, 2021 from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10994-015-5507-y. |
Zhang L, Marron JS, Shen H, Zhu Z., “Singular value decomposition and its visualization”, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Dec. 2007, vol. 6 Issue 4, pp. 833-854. Retrieved Aug. 3, 2021 from: https://ur.booksc.eu/book/59645154/3e694b. |
Shinkai, Ken-ichi et al. “Device-parameter estimation with on-chip variation sensors considering random variability.”; In 16th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC 2011), pp. 683-688. IEEE, Jan. 25, 2011. Retrieved Aug. 3, 2021 from: http://www-ise2.ist.osaka-u.ac.jp/˜hasimoto/pman2/data/pdf/152.pdf. |
Weiwei Shan et al. “An improved timing error prediction monitor for wide adaptive frequency scaling”; IEICE Electronics Express, vol. 14, No. 21, pp. 1-6, Oct. 20, 2017. Retrieved Aug. 3, 2021; DOI: 10.1587/elex.14.20170808. |
Agilent Technologies; “Clock Jitter Analysis with femto-second resolution”; Jan. 1, 2008. |
Yousuke Miyake et al; “Temperature and voltage estimation using ring-oscillator-based monitor for field test”; IEEE 23rd Asian Test Symposium; pp. 156-161, Nov. 16, 2014. Retrieved Aug. 3, 2021; DOI 10.1109/ATS.2014.38. |
Datta et al.; “Analysis of a Ring Oscillator Based on Chip Thermal Sensor IN 65nm TECHNOLOGY”; Online at: https://web.archive.org/web/20140328234617/http://www-unix.ecs.umass.edu/˜dkumar/lab4_658_report/lab4_report.htm; Sep. 5, 2018. |
Wolf et al; “Collaborative Monitors for Embedded System Security”; First Workshop on Embedded Security in conjunction with EMSOFT '06, Oct. 6, 2006 Seoul, South Korea. |
Sandeep Kumar Samal et al; “Machine Learning Based Variation Modeling and Optimization for 3D ICs”; J. Inf. Commun. Converg. Eng. 14(4): 258-267, Dec. 2016. Retrieved Aug. 3, 2021; DOI: 10.6109/jicce.2016.14.4.258. |
Yin-Nien Chen et al; “Impacts of Work Function Variation and Line-Edge Roughness on TFET and FinFET Devices and 32-Bit CLA Circuits”; J. Low Power Electron. Appl. 2015, 5, 101-115. May 21, 2015. Retrieved Aug. 3, 2021; doi:10.3390/jlpea5020101. |
Yong Zhao et al; “A Genetic Algorithm Based Remaining Lifetime Prediction for a VLIW Processor Employing Path Delay and IDDX Testing”; IEEE; Apr. 12, 2016. Retrieved Aug. 3, 2021 from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7483805. |
Dan Ernst et al; “Razor: Circuit-Level Correction of Timing Errors for Low-Power Operation”; IEEE Computer Society. Nov.-Dec. 2004. |
Dan Ernst et al; “Razor: A Low-Power Pipeline Based on Circuit-Level Timing Speculation”; Appears in the 36th Annual International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO-36). Dec. 2003. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/IL2019/050686, mailed Nov. 3, 2019, 2pp. |
PCT Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/IL2019/050686, mailed Nov. 3, 2019, 4pp. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/IL2019/050686, completed Oct. 31, 2019, 5pp. |
Zheng K., “A Comparison of Digital Droop Detection Techniques in ASAP7 FinFET”; Research Review. Sep. 2019. |
Hongge Chen, “Novel Machine Learning Approaches for Modeling Variations in Semiconductor Manufacturing,” Master hesis, Jun. 2017. |
Jianfeng Zhang et al, “Parameter Variation Sensing and Estimation in Nanoscale Fabrics”; Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing; vol. 74, Issue 6, pp. 2504-2511, Jun. 1, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2013.08.005. |
I. A. K. M. Mahfuzul et al, “Variation-sensitive monitor circuits for estimation of Die-to-Die process variation”; 2011 EEE ICMTS International Conference on Microelectronic Test Structures, Amsterdam, Netherlands; pp. 153-157, Apr. 4-7, 2011. doi: 10.1109/ICMTS.2011.5976878. |
Mng Qiao et al., “Variability-aware compact modeling and statistical circuit validation on SRAM test array”; Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 9781, Design-Process-Technology Co-optimization for Manufacturability X, Mar. 16, 2016. DOI: 10.1117/12.2219428. |
David Herres, “The Eye Diagram: What is it and why is it used?”; Online at: https://www.testandmeasurementtips.com/basics-eye-diagrams/, Aug. 16, 2016. |
Yu-Chuan Lin et al, “A 10-GB/s Eye-Opening Monitor Circuit for Receiver Equalizer Adaptations in 65-nm CMOS;” in EEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 23-34, Jan. 2020. doi: 10.1109/TVLSI.2019.2935305. |
Nidhal Selmane, Shivam Bhasin, Sylvain Guilley, Tarik Graba, Jean-Luc Danger. “WDDL is Protected Against Setup Time Violation Attacks.” CHES, Sep. 2009, Lausanne, Switzerland. pp. 73-83. DOI: 10.1109/FDTC.2009.40. |
Nidhal Selmane, Shivam Bhasin, Sylvain Guilley, Jean-Luc Danger. “Security evaluation of application-specific Integrated circuits and field programmable gate arrays against setup time violation attacks.” IET Inf. Secur., 2011, vol. 5, Iss. 4, pp. 181-190. doi: 10.1049/iet-ifs.2010.0238. |
Mridul Agarwal et al, “Circuit Failure Prediction and its Application to Transistor Aging”; 5th IEEE VLSI Test Symposium (VTS'07), pp. 277-286, May 6-10, 2007. doi: 10.1109/VTS.2007.22. |
Keith A. Bowman et al., “Energy-Efficient and Metastability-Immune Resilient Circuits for Dynamic Variation Tolerance”; IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits vol. 44, Issue 1, pp. 49-63, Jan. 2009. doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2008.2007148. |
Shidhartha Das et al, “A Self-Tuning DVS Processor Using Delay-Error Detection and Correction”; IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits; vol. 41, Issue 4, pp. 792-804, Apr. 2006. doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2006.870912. |
Shidhartha Das et al, “Razorll: In Situ Error Detection and Correction for PVT and SER Tolerance” 2008 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference—Digest of Technical Papers, Feb. 3-7, 2008. doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2008.2007145. |
Ramyanshu Datta et al, “On-Chip Delay Measurement for Silicon Debug”; GLSVLSI '04: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Great Lakes symposium on VLSI; pp. 145-148, Apr. 26-28, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1145/988952.988988. |
Alan Drake et al, “A Distributed Critical-Path Timing Monitor for a 65nm High-Performance Microprocessor”; 2007 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers; Feb. 11-15, 2007. doi: 10.1109/ISSCC.2007.373462. |
Matthias Eireiner et al, “In-Situ Delay Characterization and Local Supply Voltage Adjustment for Compensation of Local Parametric Variations”; IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits; vol. 42, Issue 7, pp. 1583-1592, Jul. 2007. doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2007.896695. |
Matthew Fojtik et al, “Bubble Razor: An architecture-independent approach to timing-error detection and correction”; 2012 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference; Feb. 19-23, 2012. doi: 10.1109/ISSCC.2012.6177103. |
Matthew Fojtik et al, “Bubble Razor: Eliminating Timing Margins in an ARM Cortex-M3 Processor in 45 nm CMOS Using Architecturally Independent Error Detection and Correction”; IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits; vol. 48, Issue 1, pp. 66-81, Jan. 2013. doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2012.2220912. |
Piero Franco et al, “On-Line Delay Testing of Digital Circuits”; Proceedings of IEEE VLSI Test Symposium; Apr. 25-28, 1994. doi: 10.1109/VTEST.1994.292318. |
V. Huard et al, “Adaptive Wearout Management with in-situ aging monitors”; 2014 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium; Jun. 1-5, 2014. pp. 6B.4.1-6B.4.11, doi: 10.1109/IRPS.2014.6861106. |
Liangzhen Lai et al, “SlackProbe: A Flexible and Efficient In Situ Timing Slack Monitoring Methodology”; IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems; vol. 33, Issue 8, pp. 1168-1179, Aug. 2014. doi: 10.1109/TCAD.2014.2323195. |
M. Saliva et al, “Digital Circuits Reliability with In-Situ Monitors in 28nm Fully Depleted SOI”; 2015 Design, Automation Mar. 9-13, 2015. doi: 10.7873/DATE.2015.0238. |
Martin Wirnshofer et al, “A Variation-Aware Adaptive Voltage Scaling Technique based on In-Situ Delay Monitoring”; 14th IEEE International Symposium on Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits and Systems; pp. 261-266, Apr. 13-15, 2011. doi: 10.1109/DDECS.2011.5783090. |
Martin Wirnshofer et al, “An Energy-Efficient Supply Voltage Scheme using In-Situ Pre-Error Detection for on-the-fly Voltage Adaptation to PVT Variations”; 2011 International Symposium on Integrated Circuits; pp. 94-97, Dec. 12-14, 2011. doi: 10.1109/ISICir.2011.6131888. |
Martin Wirnshofer et al, “On-line supply voltage scaling based on in situ delay monitoring to adapt for PVTA variations”; Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers; vol. 21, No. 08, Mar. 7, 2012. doi: 10.1142/S0218126612400270. |
S. Mhira et al, “Dynamic Adaptive Voltage Scaling in Automotive environment”; 2017 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS); pp. 3A-4.1-3A-4.7, Apr. 2-6, 2017. doi: 10.1109/IRPS.2017.7936279. |
A. Benhassain et al, “Early failure prediction by using in-situ monitors: Implementation and application results”; Online at: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1566/Paper6.pdf, Mar. 18, 2016. |
Charles R. Lefurgy et al, “Active Management of Timing Guardband to Save Energy in POWER7”; 2011 44th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO); pp. 1-11; Dec. 3-7, 2011. |
C. R. Lefurgy et al., “Active Guardband Management in Power7+ to Save Energy and Maintain Reliability”; in IEEE Micro, vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 35-45, Jul.-Aug. 2013. doi: 10.1109/MM.2013.52. |
B. Zandian et al, “Cross-layer resilience using wearout aware design flow”; 2011 IEEE/IFIP 41st International Conference on Dependable Systems & Networks (DSN), pp. 279-290, Jun. 27-30, 2011. doi: 10.1109/DSN.2011.5958226. |
M. Cho et al., “Postsilicon Voltage Guard-Band Reduction in a 22 nm Graphics Execution Core Using Adaptive Voltage Scaling and Dynamic Power Gating”; in IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 50-63, Jan. 4, 2017. doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2016.2601319. |
W. Shan et al, “Timing error prediction based adaptive voltage scaling for dynamic variation tolerance”; 2014 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems (APCCAS), pp. 739-742, Nov. 17-20, 2014. doi: 10.1109/APCCAS.2014.7032887. |
J. Li et al, “Robust and in-situ self-testing technique for monitoring device aging effects in pipeline circuits”; 2014 51st ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC), pp. 1-6, Jun. 1-5, 2014. |
X. Shang et al, “A 0.44V-1.1V 9-transistor transition-detector and half-path error detection technique for low power applications”; 2017 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (A-SSCC), pp. 205-208, Nov. 6-8, 2017. doi: 10.1109/ASSCC.2017.8240252. |
Liangzhen Lai et al, “Accurate and inexpensive performance monitoring for variability-aware systems”; 2014 19th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference (ASP-DAC), pp. 467-473, Jan. 20-23, 2014. doi: 10.1109/ASPDAC.2014.6742935. |
Martin Wirnshofer et al, “Adaptive voltage scaling by in-situ delay monitoring for an image processing circuit”; 2012 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits & Systems (DDECS), pp. 205-208, Apr. 18-20, 2012. doi: 10.1109/DDECS.2012.6219058. |
Youhua Shi et al, “Suspicious timing error prediction with in-cycle clock gating”; International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED), pp. 335-340, Mar. 4-6, 2013. doi: 10.1109/ISQED.2013.6523631. |
Youhua Shi et al, “In-situ timing monitoring methods for variation-resilient designs”; 2014 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems (APCCAS), pp. 735-738, Nov. 17-20, 2014. doi: 10.1109/APCCAS.2014.7032886. |
Jongho Kim et al., “Adaptive delay monitoring for wide voltage-range operation”; 2016 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), pp. 511-516, Mar. 14-18, 2016. DOI: 10.3850/9783981537079 0330. |
Xiaobin Yuan et al., “Design Considerations for Reconfigurable Delay Circuit to Emulate System Critical Paths”; in IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, vol. 23, No. 11, pp. 2714-2718, Nov. 2015. doi: 10.1109/TVLSI.2014.2364785. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220012395 A1 | Jan 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62686744 | Jun 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17254468 | US | |
Child | 17485168 | US |