Efficient light emitting diodes and lasers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6881983
  • Patent Number
    6,881,983
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 26, 2002
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 19, 2005
    19 years ago
Abstract
An optoelectronic device such as an LED or laser which produces spontaneous emission by recombination of carriers (electrons and holes) trapped in Quantum Confinement Regions formed by transverse thickness variations in Quantum Well layers of group III nitrides.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Light emitting diodes (“LEDs”) are p-n junction devices that have been found to be useful in various roles as the field of optoelectronics has grown and expanded over the years. Devices that emit in the visible portion of the electromagnetic spectrum have been used as simple status indicators, dynamic power level bar graphs, and alphanumeric displays in many applications, such as audio systems, automobiles, household electronics, and computer systems, among many others. Infrared devices have been used in conjunction with spectrally matched phototransistors in optoisolators, hand-held remote controllers, and interruptive, reflective, and fiber-optic sensing applications.


An LED operates based on the recombination of carriers (electrons and holes) in a semiconductor. When an electron in the conduction band combines with a hole in the valence band, it loses energy equal to the bandgap of the semiconductor in the form of an emitted photon; i.e., light. The number of recombination events under equilibrium conditions is insufficient for practical applications but can be enhanced by increasing the minority carrier density.


The minority carrier density is conventionally increased by forward biasing the diode. The injected minority carriers recombine with the majority carriers within a few diffusion lengths of the junction edge, generating photons at a wavelength corresponding to the bandgap energy of the semiconductor.


As with other electronic devices, there exists both the desire and need for more efficient LEDs, and in particular, LEDs that will operate at higher intensity while using less power. Higher intensity LEDs, for example, are particularly useful for displays or status indicators in various high ambient environments. High efficiency LEDs with lower power consumption, for example, are particularly useful in various portable electronic equipment applications. An example of an attempt to meet this need for higher intensity, lower power, and more efficient LEDs may be seen with the development of the AlGaAs LED technology for the red portions of the visible spectrum. A similar continual need has been felt for LEDs that will emit in the green, blue and ultraviolet regions of the visible spectrum which ranges from 400 nanometers (nm) (3.10 eV) to 770 nm (1.61 ev). Because red, green, and blue are primary colors, their presence is necessary to produce full color displays or pure white light.


As mentioned above, the wavelength (s) of photons that can be produced by a given semiconductor material is a function of the material's bandgap (Eg). This relationship can be expressed as s(nm)=1240/Eg(eV). Thus smaller bandgap materials produce lower energy, longer wavelength photons, while wider bandgap materials are required to produce higher energy, shorter wavelength photons. For example, one semiconductor commonly used for lasers is indium gallium aluminum phosphide (InGaAlP). This material's bandgap depends upon the mole or atomic fraction of each element present, and the light that InGaAlP can produce is limited to the yellow to red portion of the visible spectrum, i.e., about 560 to 700 nm.


In order to produce photons that have wavelengths in the green, blue or ultraviolet (LV) portions of the spectrum, semiconductor materials with relatively large bandgaps are required. Typical candidate materials include silicon carbide (6H—SiC with a bandgap of 2.5 eV) and alloys of indium nitride (InN with a bandgap of 1.9 eV), gallium nitride (GaN with a bandgap of 3.4 eV) and aluminum nitride (AlN with a bandgap of 6.2 eV). Since these nitrides can form solid solutions, the bandgap of these alloys (AlInGaN) can be tuned potentially from 1.9 eV to 6.2 eV with a corresponding wavelength varying from 653 nm to 200 nm at room temperature.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Aluminum indium gallium nitride (AlInGaN) is a very attractive LED candidate material for green, blue and UV wavelengths because of its relatively large bandgap at room temperature and because it is a direct bandgap material rather than an indirect bandgap material. Generally speaking, an LED formed in a direct bandgap material is more efficient than one formed in an indirect bandgap material because the recombination of carriers occurs directly without the help of phonons (lattice vibration) and the photon from the direct transition retains more energy than one from an indirect transition.


Because the bulk gallium nitride (hexagonal GaN; a=0.3189 nm, c=0.5185 nm) substrates are not readily available, AlInGaN layers are typically grown on a sapphire (hexagonal alpha-Al2O3; a=0.4578 nm, c=1.299 nm) or on a silicon carbide substrate (hexagonal 6H—SiC; a=0.308 nm, c=1.512 nm). The AlInGaN films grow by lattice matching epitaxy on 6H—SiC, and by domain matching epitaxy on sapphire. The AlInGaN growth on sapphire involves a 30/90 degree rotation in the basal plane, and 6/7 domain matching of the major planes between the film and the substrate. The differences in lattice constants and coefficients of thermal expansion between the film and the substrate cause misfit strains which result in high dislocation densities in AlInGaN layers, typically around 1010 cm−2. When carriers (electrons and holes) are trapped by dislocations, they recombine non-radioactively without generating light.


In accordance with a first embodiment of the invention, an efficient optoelectronic device of the type which produces spontaneous emission by radiative recombination of carriers (electrons and holes) is formed of a layered quantum well (QW) structure in which the thickness of the QW layers varies periodically. It is believed that the thickness variations result in the formation of Quantum Confinement (QC) regions, which trap the carriers. If the QC regions are smaller than the separation between dislocations, the trapped carriers recombine radioactively and efficiently produce photons. In another embodiment, Al is added to InGaN to increase the wavelength to produce a AlyInxGa(1−x−y)N Laser Device (LD) or multiquantum well (MQW) LED.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.



FIG. 1 is a schematic of Short-Range Thickness Variation (SR-TV) and Long-Range Thickness Variation (LR-TV) of a portion of the active GaN/InGaN quantum well superlatice layers in a high efficiency light emitting diode structure.



FIG. 2 is a schematic of showing details of the LED structure.



FIG. 3A is a scanning transmission electron microscopy-atomic number (STEM-Z) contrast image in cross-section showing short-range thickness variation in the active InGaN layer in a high efficiency LED structure.



FIG. 3B is a enlargement of FIG. 3A.



FIG. 4 is a STEM-Z contrast image in cross-section showing long-range thickness variation in all ten InGaN layers of a multiple-quantum-well (MQW) structure.



FIG. 5A is a STEM-Z contrast image of cross-section showing characteristic long-range thickness variation in a InGaN/GaN MQW structure from another high-efficiency LED wafer.



FIG. 5B is a STEM-Z contrast image of the cross-section showing the short-range thickness variation in a InGaN/GaN MQW structure (same wafer as FIG. 5A).



FIG. 6A is a STEM-Z contrast image showing uniform InGaN layers in a relative low efficiency LED structure.



FIG. 6B is a enlargement if FIG. 6A.



FIG. 7 is a comparison of output power from an LED with periodic thickness variation (A) and an LED with uniform thickness (C).



FIG. 8A is a schematic of the laser diode (LD) structure where the LD is grown on sapphire.



FIG. 8B is a schematic of the laser diode (LD) structure where the LD is grown on n GaN or SiC.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

A description of preferred embodiments of the invention follows.


In accordance with the invention, InxGa(1−x)N based multiquantum well (MQW) light emitting diodes (LEDs) and laser devices having high optical efficiency, are fabricated in which the efficiency is related to the Thickness Variation (TV) of the InxGa(1−x)N active layers. The thickness variation of active layers is found to be more important than the In composition fluctuation in quantum confinement (QC) of excitons (carriers) in these devices. In the invention, we have produced MQW InxGa(1−x)N layers with a periodic thickness variation, which results in periodic fluctuation of bandgap for the quantum confinement of carriers. Detailed STEM-Z contrast analysis (where image contrast is proportional to Z2 (atomic number)2) was carried out to investigate the spatial distribution of In. We discovered that there is a longitudinal periodic variation in the thickness of InxGa(1−x)N layers with two periods, one short-range (SR-TV, 3 to 4 nm) and other long-range thickness variations of (LR-TV, 50 to 100 nm). It was also found that the effect of variation in In concentration is considerably less than the effect of thickness variation in the LED structures which exhibit high optical efficiency. A comparative microstructural study between high and low optical efficiency MQW structures indicates that thickness variation of InxGa(1−x)N active layers is the key to their enhancement in optical efficiency.


As shown in FIG. 1, QC regions 2 are formed within the boundaries of either LR-TV or SR-TV as a result of the thickness variations. The QC regions 2 trap the carriers, which recombine without being affected by the presence of stress induced dislocations. A detailed STEM-Z contrast analysis shows that the thickness variation of InxGa(1−x)N layers 12 is more important then the In composition fluctuation in producing quantum confined regions for carriers, leading to enhanced optical efficiency of LEDs and LDs. The bandgap change is dictated by the thickness:

(Lz) via: ΔE1=h2n2/(8m*Lz2)  (1),

where E1 is the lowest allowed energy level, h is Planck's constant, and m* is effective mass.


A schematic of an LED structure set forth in FIG. 2 is grown on a sapphire substrate 6 by means of metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD). Sources for the growth are trimethylgallium, trimethylaluminum, trimethylindium are used as sources for group-III elements, ammonia for the nitrogen, disilane for the n-type doping and biscyclopentadienyl (CP2Mg) for the p-type doping. First, a nucleation layer of AlGaInN 5-30 nm thick is grown at a temperature of ˜500 C. Then Si-doped n-type GaN layer 4 (3-5 μm thick) is grown at a temperature between 1000 and 1050 C. Then an InGaN(12)/GaN MQW(14) structure 8 is grown at a temperature between 700 and 750 C for InGaN and 850 and 950 C for GaN. Then Mg-doped p-type GaN layer 10 is grown at a temperature between 950 and 1000 C. Optionally, Mg-doped p-type AlGaN layer 10A is grown between the MQW structure and p-type GaN at a temperature between 950 and 1000 C.


In order to create the thickness variation, the growth temperature of part of the n-type layer (˜0.1 micron) near the active region is lowered. The preferred temperature range is between 880 and 920 C, while conventional growth temperature is between 1000 and 1050 C. Wafer A was grown under the preferred growth conditions, while wafer C was grown under the conventional growth temperature. (See FIG. 7).


We have analyzed the InGaN/GaN MQW structures using STEM-Z transmission electron microscopy (TEM), in which the image contrast is proportional to Z2 (Z=atomic number). Since the atomic number of In (49) is much higher than that of Ga (31), the contrast due to In is enhanced by two and a half times compared to Ga, and the image contrast is dictated primarily by the In concentration.



FIGS. 3-5 show STEM-Z contrast images in cross-section from two LED structures which exhibited high optical efficiencies. These specimens show short-range (3 to 4 nm period) and long-range (50 to 100 nm period) thickness variations in InGaN layers. This contrast analysis reveals that there are variations in In concentration, but they are not very large. In other embodiments, depending upon the growth of the structure, short-range thickness variations can range between 2 to 10 nm and long-range thickness variations can range between 50 and 200 nm.


In contrast to the high optical efficiency specimens (FIGS. 3-5), a specimen with relatively low optical efficiencies is shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B. In these specimens, where optical efficiencies are lower by a factor of two to three than those for the specimens in FIGS. 3-5, the superlattice thickness as well as indium concentration is quite uniform.


The change in bandgap of InxGa(1−x)N alloys can occur as function of the composition ‘x’ and the thickness ‘Lz’ of the superlattice. For a typical active layer composition (x=0.4), the change in bandgap is estimated to be as follows: x=0.4, bandgap=2.58 eV; x=0.5, bandgap=2.43 eV; x=0.3, bandgap=2.75 eV. This amounts to a +/−25% change (from x=0.4) in active layer composition. Experimentally observed composition fluctuations are less than +/−5%, which should lead to a less than 0.07 eV change in the bandgap. On the other hand, thickness variation from 3 to 2 nm can change the bandgap by more than 0.2 eV. Experimentally observed LR-TV is in the range of 20 to 50%, and SR-TV is less than 10%. Based on this analysis, we believe that the QC regions are defined principally by the thickness in InGaN layers.


An LED is fabricated by forming an ohmic contact 20 on the top p-type GaN surface 10 of FIG. 2 and forming another contact on the n-type GaN surface 4 after it is exposed by etching the p-type GaN layer 10 and the active region 8. The light output power of LEDs from two such wafers is shown in FIG. 7. The output power of the LED from the specimen with InGaN thickness variation 22 is about a factor of 2-3 higher than that from the specimen with uniform InGaN thickness 24. Thus our experimental results on a comparative study of high- and low-efficiency LEDs demonstrate that thickness variation coupled with indium concentration variation is the key to enhancing the optical efficiencies in LEDs. We believe that the thickness variation is caused by two-dimensional strain in the InxGa(1−x)N layer below its critical thickness. Since strain energy increases with thickness, the uniform thickness breaks into a periodic variation by which the free energy of the system can be lowered. Since the strain also increases with In concentration, some fluctuation in In concentration is also expected. This phenomenon of thickness variation has been well documented for pure germanium thin film growth on (100) silicon below its critical thickness where no composition fluctuation is involved references. We have modeled the thickness variation and derived the following relation for TV period (λ):

λ=πγ(1−ν)/[2(1+ν)2με2]  (2),

where γ is the surface energy, ν is the Poisson's ratio, μ is the shear modulus of the film, and ε is the strain normal to the film surface. To avoid non-radiative recombination at the dislocations (density ρ), we derive the optimum structure to be:

ρ−1/2>πγ(1−ν)/[2(1+ν)2με2]  (3)

or

ρ<{πγ(1−ν)/[2(1+ν)2με2]}−2  (4).


We have estimated a typical value of λ using the following parameters for our growth conditions. For In0.4Ga0.6N, shear modulus is estimated to be 82 Gpa, Poisson's ratio to be 0.3, surface energy 4,000 ergs/cm2, and strain 2%. These values result in λ of 80 nm, which is in good agreement with observed LR-TV. Since the period varies as ε−2, the large misfit strain initially could lead to observed SR-TV.


Although we have shown the formation of QC regions 2 due to thickness variation in InGaN, a similar effect can be obtained in AlInGaN for shorter wavelength LEDs. In this case, superlattice can be formed between AlInGaN and AlGaN or between AlInGaN layers with different alloy compositions.


The QC regions 2 can also be beneficial for laser diode fabrication. FIGS. 8A and 8B show the schematic of a LD structure 26. In order to form the waveguide, either AlGaN, AlGaN/GaN superlattice, or AlInGaN layers can be used for the cladding layers, and InGaN/GaN or AlInGaN/AlGaN MQWs can be used for the active layers. To facilitate the ohmic contacts, a p-type GaN or InGaN cap layer 28 is added on top of the p-type cladding layer 30. If the LD structure 26 is grown on an insulating substrate 6 such as sapphire, the n contacts 32 are formed after the n-type GaN layer 4 is exposed by etching the top layers. If it is grown on top of a conducting substrate 7 such as SiC or GaN, the n contacts 32 are formed on the bottom of the substrate. The fabrication of the laser is completed by forming feedback mirrors. This can be done either by cleaving the wafer perpendicular to the contact stripe or by etching vertical walls using anisotropic etching techniques.


While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An optoelectronic device comprising: a substrate; and multiple quantum well (MQW) layers formed of Group III nitrides in which carriers recombine to emit photons, the layers being formed over the substrate and wherein the layers periodically vary in thickness along a continuous length thereof.
  • 2. The device of claim 1, wherein the layers have stress induced dislocations and the thickness variations result in the formation of quantum confinement regions which are smaller than separations between the stress induced dislocations.
  • 3. The device of claim 2, wherein the quantum confinement regions trap the carriers, which recombine to produce the photons for efficient spontaneous emissions.
  • 4. The device of claim 1, including contacts formed on the device and a voltage source coupled to the contacts to enable the device to operate as a high efficiency LED.
  • 5. The device of claim 1, including a feedback mirror to produce coherent light.
  • 6. The device of claim 1 in which the MQWs are formed of layers of InxGa(1−x)N and GaN.
  • 7. The device of claim 1 in which the MQWs are formed of layers of AlyInxGa(1−x−y)N and Al2Ga(1−z)N.
  • 8. The device of claim 1 in which the substrate is formed of a compound from the class of Al2O3, Si, SiC, GaN or AlN or alloys thereof.
  • 9. The device of claim 1 in which the thickness variation is a relatively short longitudinal range on the order of 2 to 10 nanometers (nm).
  • 10. The device of claim 9 having an additional long-range thickness variation in the order of 50 to 200 nm and thickness variation more than 10%.
  • 11. The device of claim 9 having an additional long-range thickness variation more than 10%.
  • 12. The device of claim 9 having a long-range thickness variation period less than the separation of dislocations.
  • 13. An LED comprising: a substrate; and multiple quantum well (MQW) layers formed of Group III nitrides in which carriers recombine to emit photons, the layers being formed over the substrate and wherein the layers periodically vary in thickness along a continuous length thereof.
  • 14. The device of claim 13, wherein the layers have stress induced dislocations and the thickness variations result in the formation of quantum confinement regions which are smaller than separations between the stress induced dislocations.
  • 15. The device of claim 13, wherein the quantum confinement regions trap the carriers, which recombine to produce the photons for efficient spontaneous emission.
  • 16. The LED of claim 13, wherein the substrate is formed of Al2O3, the quantum well layers are formed of InGaN/GaN, an n GaN is formed between the Al2O3 and quantum well layers, and a p GaN is formed over the quantum well layers.
RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/083,703, filed Feb. 25, 2002, of which the entire teachings is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (72)
Number Name Date Kind
4153905 Charmakadze et al. May 1979 A
4495514 Lawrence et al. Jan 1985 A
4670088 Tsaur et al. Jun 1987 A
4946548 Kotaki et al. Aug 1990 A
4966862 Edmond Oct 1990 A
5091333 Fan et al. Feb 1992 A
5210051 Carter, Jr. May 1993 A
5239188 Takeuchi et al. Aug 1993 A
5247533 Okazaki et al. Sep 1993 A
5252499 Rothschild Oct 1993 A
5272108 Kozawa Dec 1993 A
5278433 Manabe et al. Jan 1994 A
5281830 Kotaki et al. Jan 1994 A
5285078 Mimura et al. Feb 1994 A
5290393 Nakamura Mar 1994 A
5306662 Nakamura et al. Apr 1994 A
5323022 Glass et al. Jun 1994 A
5334277 Nakamura Aug 1994 A
5369289 Tamaki et al. Nov 1994 A
5385862 Mooustakas Jan 1995 A
5406123 Narayan Apr 1995 A
5408120 Manabe et al. Apr 1995 A
5433169 Nakamura Jul 1995 A
5442205 Brasen et al. Aug 1995 A
5468678 Nakamura et al. Nov 1995 A
5516731 Toutounchi et al. May 1996 A
5563422 Nakamura et al. Oct 1996 A
5578839 Nakamura et al. Nov 1996 A
5637530 Gaines et al. Jun 1997 A
5652434 Nakamura et al. Jul 1997 A
5686738 Moustakas Nov 1997 A
5733796 Manabe et al. Mar 1998 A
5734182 Nakamura et al. Mar 1998 A
5747832 Nakamura et al. May 1998 A
5751752 Shakuda May 1998 A
5767581 Nakamura et al. Jun 1998 A
5777350 Nakamura et al. Jul 1998 A
5828684 Van de Walle Oct 1998 A
5834326 Miyachi et al. Nov 1998 A
5850410 Kuramata Dec 1998 A
5877558 Nakamura et al. Mar 1999 A
5880486 Nakamura et al. Mar 1999 A
5905276 Manabe et al. May 1999 A
5959307 Nakamura et al. Sep 1999 A
5998925 Shimizu et al. Dec 1999 A
6001669 Gaines et al. Dec 1999 A
6017774 Yuasa et al. Jan 2000 A
6051849 Davis et al. Apr 2000 A
6066861 Höhn et al. May 2000 A
6069440 Shimizu et al. May 2000 A
6078063 Nakamura et al. Jun 2000 A
6084899 Shakuda Jul 2000 A
6093965 Nakamura et al. Jul 2000 A
6115399 Shakuda Sep 2000 A
6153010 Kiyoku et al. Nov 2000 A
6172382 Nagahama et al. Jan 2001 B1
6204512 Nakamura et al. Mar 2001 B1
6215133 Nakamura et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222871 Chang-Hasnain et al. Apr 2001 B1
6238943 Kobayashi et al. May 2001 B1
6245259 Höhn et al. Jun 2001 B1
6249012 Manabe et al. Jun 2001 B1
6337493 Tanizawa et al. Jan 2002 B1
6362017 Manabe et al. Mar 2002 B1
6495862 Okazaki et al. Dec 2002 B1
6555457 Derkits, Jr. et al. Apr 2003 B1
20010022367 Nakamura et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010030318 Nakamura et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010032976 Ishikawa et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020046693 Kiyoku et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020060326 Manabe et al. May 2002 A1
20020182765 Tran et al. May 2002 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (32)
Number Date Country
33 45 172 Jul 1985 DE
0 356 059 Feb 1990 EP
0483688 Oct 1991 EP
0483688 Oct 1991 EP
0 513 745 Nov 1992 EP
54-093380 Jul 1979 JP
59-228776 Dec 1984 JP
61-056474 Mar 1986 JP
02-229475 Sep 1990 JP
2229475 Sep 1990 JP
03-203388 Sep 1991 JP
03-218625 Sep 1991 JP
03-252177 Nov 1991 JP
04-068579 Mar 1992 JP
4209577 Jul 1992 JP
4236478 Aug 1992 JP
04-242985 Aug 1992 JP
05-243614 Sep 1993 JP
06-021511 Jan 1994 JP
06-177423 Jun 1994 JP
06-268259 Sep 1994 JP
8167735 Jun 1996 JP
8213692 Aug 1996 JP
8306643 Nov 1996 JP
8306958 Nov 1996 JP
8316527 Nov 1996 JP
52-028887 Mar 1997 JP
9092880 Apr 1997 JP
9134881 May 1997 JP
9167857 Jun 1997 JP
11145513 May 1999 JP
WO 8800392 Jan 1988 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20030160246 A1 Aug 2003 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10083703 Feb 2002 US
Child 10207649 US