Patent Grant
7397836
The present invention relates generally to an improved method and apparatus for generating electronically excited states of oxygen with increased efficiency and at an elevated pressure.
The invention relates to an improved method and apparatus for generating the singlet delta electronically excited state of diatomic oxygen, O2(a1Δg), in vapor form. The apparatus for generating singlet delta oxygen is referred to as a singlet oxygen generator or SOG. Singlet delta oxygen is most typically used in chemical lasers, or specifically in chemical oxygen-iodine lasers (COIL), although there may be other uses for singlet delta oxygen and particularly for singlet delta oxygen generated according to the method and using the SOG of the invention.
Singlet delta oxygen is generally produced by reacting aqueous basic hydrogen peroxide (BHP) with chlorine. Aqueous BHP is produced by mixing liquid water with an aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and an aqueous solution of potassium hydroxide (KOH). Alternatively, sodium hydroxide (NaOH) may be used in place of KOH. In the BHP solution, the H2O2and KOH exist as various ionic molecules. The mixing and reactive process in making BHP is exothermic.
When BHP is mixed with chlorine, the following stoichiometric chemical reaction takes place:
H2O2+KOH+Cl2→KCl+HCl+H2O+O2(1Δ) Reaction A
where the oxygen is in its lowest energy electronically excited state, O2(a1Δg). For convenience, this is referred to as singlet delta oxygen or as O2(1Δ). Normally, oxygen is in its electronic ground state, O2(X3Σg−), which, hereafter, is written as O2(3Σ) or just O2. In Reaction A, the chlorine vapor diffuses into the aqueous BHP solution, forming potassium chloride (KCl), or sodium chloride (NaCl) if NaOH is used in the reaction, water, and O2(1Δ). The O2(1Δ) can form bubbles and diffuse out of the solution. The presence of singlet delta oxygen from the reaction of BHP and chlorine in Reaction A is evident by a red dimol emission (see “Direct Spectroscopic Evidence for a Deuterium Solvent Effect on the Lifetime of Singlet Delta Oxygen in Water,” Kajiwara and Kearns, Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 95, No. 18, pp. 5886-5890, September 1973) that is visible by sight. This emission stems from the chemiluminescence of (O2(a1Δ))2.
Singlet delta oxygen has a long radiative lifetime of about 50 minutes, but can collisionally deactivate in much less time, resulting in the production of the ground state and the next higher electronically excited state, O2(1Σ), of diatomic oxygen. An important process is the gas-phase pooling reaction:
O2(1Δ)+O2(1Δ)⇄O2(3Σ)+O2(1Σ) Reaction B
wherein O2(1Σ) is shorthand for O2(b1Σg+) which is a more energetic electronic state than singlet delta oxygen. The O2(1Σ) and O2(3Σ) are contaminants or byproducts in the singlet delta oxygen stream, which reduce the yield of singlet delta oxygen. When O2(1Δ) is the preferred product, as is the case with the chemical laser, then Reaction B is a deactivation process to the extent that the forward rate exceeds the backward rate.
Reaction B is a gas-phase process that can be viewed as producing the O2(1Σ) state. In non-laser applications, this state may be preferred as equal to or superior to the O2(1Δ) state. Hereafter, when discussing the singlet delta state of oxygen, as generated by an SOG according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the O2(1Σ) state, produced by Reaction B, is not excluded.
An important deactivation process is the dimol reaction:
O2(1Δ)+O2(1Δ)→(O2(a1Δ))2→2O2 Reaction C
Reactions B and C are the primary deactivation process for removing O2(1Δ) in the gas phase. The gas phase generated by the SOG of this invention consists of O2(1Δ) (which is the preferred species for COIL), O2(3Σ), O2(1Σ), H2O, and possibly a small mole fraction of chlorine vapor. The O2(3Σ), O2(1Σ), H2O and chlorine vapor (if any) are referred to as the gas-phase byproducts. In addition, there may or may not be added diluent, which is not a byproduct. For COIL, a common measure of effectiveness is the yield, which is the mole ratio of O2(1Δ) divided by the total oxygen.
Various types of singlet delta oxygen generators have been developed in the prior art. These generators typically use BHP with chlorine and a diluent gas, such as helium. Optimum singlet delta oxygen production occurs when the H2O2 molar flow rate, relative to the KOH, or NaOH, molar flow rate has a slight excess of RXN that suggested by Reaction A; i.e., H2O2 and KOH have approximately the same molar flow rate. These molar flow rates were used in the feasibility experiment according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, as described later.
One type of prior art SOG uses a transverse flow uniform droplet method in which BHP droplets, ranging in size from 0.4 mm to 0.5 mm (15.8 mil to 19.7 mil) diameter, fall under the influence of gravity into a sump. Chlorine vapor and a diluent gas flow across the path of the droplets. The flow speed of the chlorine vapor and diluent is limited, otherwise the droplets would be transported downstream with the diluent and the generated oxygen. There is an adverse trade-off in that the maximum vapor speed, which includes the generated singlet delta oxygen, must decrease as the droplet size decreases. Generator pressures of around 92 Torr (0.12 atm), most of which is due to helium diluent, have been reported in this type of SOG. The partial pressure of the generated oxygen reported for this type of SOG is only around 14.3 Torr (0.02 atm).
Another type of prior art SOG is a verticoil oxygen generator. In this device, a number of disks rotate such that the lower portion of the disks is in a BHP sump. The upper portion of the disks is thus wetted with a BHP film. Chlorine vapor and diluent flow past the upper part of the disks to react with the BHP film. Generator pressures of about 40 Torr (0.05 atm), most of which stems from the helium diluent that enters the reactor with the chlorine vapor, have been reported in this type of SOG.
Another type of prior art SOG is a twisted-flow aersol-jet singlet oxygen generator. A partial pressure of about 75 Torr (0.1 atm) of singlet delta oxygen has been reported for this type of generator, but this O2(1Δ) pressure decreases, to around 22.5 Torr (0.03 atm), at a nozzle inlet for a laser. This significantly decreases the laser efficiency.
The foregoing prior art SOGs have, in common, a number of adverse characteristics:
In addition to prior art SOGs, gas sparger devices are relevant to the production of singlet delta oxygen according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention and as discussed more fully below. Gas sparger devices are designed to remove volatile contaminants from a liquid. In a prior art gas sparger, a contaminated liquid is injected, under pressure, onto the inside surface of a porous tube with a circular cross section. Centrifugal force keeps the liquid attached to the inside of the porous walled tube. The liquid follows a helical path as it makes a number of revolutions along the wall. Air, under pressure, is injected from the outside surface of the porous walled tube, through the tube, after which it mixes with the liquid. Most of the volatile contaminants are entrained with the air, which separates from the liquid, due to buoyancy that stems from the centrifugal force. Chemical reactions do not occur in typical gas spargers.
A preferred embodiment of the present invention, accordingly, provides a singlet delta oxygen generator (SOG) comprising a generator for producing froth from at least a reaction of a basic hydrogen peroxide (BHP) solution and chlorine. The SOG including a porous inlet for the chlorine and a chamber for receiving the froth, wherein the chamber includes a throat for carrying singlet delta oxygen produced by the froth.
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the generator further comprises a BHP inlet, and a ramp that receives the BHP solution from the BHP inlet, wherein the ramp includes a converging section and a diverging section.
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the porous inlet is located in the diverging section of the ramp.
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the throat feeds a laser cavity of a Chemical Oxygen Iodine Laser (COIL).
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the chamber further comprises a curved wall section in fluid communication with the generator at a first end for carrying the froth from the generator, a Converging-Diverging nozzle which includes the throat that is in fluid communication with the froth along the curved wall section, and an exhaust in fluid communication with the curved wall section at a second end for carrying away spent reactants.
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the pressure in the SOG is between about 100 Torr to about 760 Torr.
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the SOG further comprises a cooling system for cooling the BHP solution to a temperature between about 5° C. and about 10° C. above its freezing point prior to the BHP inlet.
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the chlorine molar flow rate is about 70-120% of the molar flow rate of the BHP solution.
In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the present invention, a COIL is provided. The COIL comprises a SOG having a generator for producing froth from at least a reaction of a BHP solution and chlorine. The SOG includes a porous inlet for the chlorine and a chamber for receiving the froth, wherein the chamber includes a throat for carrying singlet delta oxygen produced by the froth. The COIL includes a laser cavity for receiving singlet delta oxygen from the throat.
The foregoing has outlined rather broadly the features and technical advantages of the present invention in order that the detailed description of the invention that follows may be better understood. Additional features and advantages of the invention will be described hereinafter which form the subject of the claims of the invention. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the conception and the specific embodiment disclosed may be readily utilized as a basis for modifying or designing other structures for carrying out the same purposes of the present invention. It should also be realized by those skilled in the art that such equivalent constructions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.
The accompanying drawings are incorporated into and form a part of the specification to assist in explaining the present invention. The drawings are intended for illustrative purposes only and are not intended as exact representations of the embodiments of the present invention. The drawings further illustrate preferred examples of how the invention can be made and used and are not to be construed as limiting the invention to only those examples illustrated and described. In these drawings, the same reference characters are used throughout the views to indicate like or corresponding parts. The various advantages and features of the present invention will be apparent from a consideration of the drawings in which:
Refer now to the drawings wherein depicted elements are, for the sake of clarity, not necessarily shown to scale and wherein like or similar elements are designated by the same reference numeral through the several views.
In prior art systems, the H2O2 molar flow rate, relative to the KOH, or NaOH, molar flow rate is about same that suggested by Reaction A, i.e., H2O2 and KOH have approximately the same molar flow rate. Preferably, according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the H2O2 molar flow rate is about 100% or more of the KOH molar flow rate, and most preferably between 50% to 110% of the KOH molar flow rate. The aqueous KOH and aqueous H2O2 mixed in mixer tank 12 are commercially available aqueous solutions that are each buffered with additional water. Due to this additional water, the BHP solution is more dilute than is used in prior art systems. Although not necessarily optimum values, the mole ratios of H2O2, KOH, and H2O used in the feasibility experiment discussed below were approximately 1:1:10, where the H2O molar value of 10 consists of the aqueous portions of the H2O2 and KOH solutions plus the added water. In the discussion of molar ratios of H2O, H2O2, and KOH herein, the H2O value consists of the aqueous portions of the H2O2 and KOH solutions plus added H2O. The amount of dilution is higher than prior art practice and may be further increased according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention to produce a highly dilute BHP solution to aid in reaction temperature reduction.
The aqueous KOH, aqueous H2O2, and added water require cooling when they are mixed because of the exothermicity of reactions. Once mixed, and sometime before usage, the BHP should be cooled to a temperature just above its freezing point, preferably to a temperature 1° C. to 10° C. above its freezing point. This temperature is below the freezing point for pure liquid water, since a solute lowers the freezing point. The BHP enters SOG Reactor 14 at a temperature where its water vapor partial pressure is below the 4.6 Torr (0.006 atm) value of pure water at 0° C. Due to the use of a relatively dilute BHP solution according to the preferred embodiment of the invention, problems in the prior art with anomalous freezing of the BHP are not encountered.
Chlorine liquid from chlorine supply tank 16 is vaporized in a heater 18 with the chlorine vapor flowing into SOG 14. A pump is usually not required, since the room temperature vapor pressure of liquid chlorine should be sufficient for providing the desired flow rate of chlorine to SOG 14.
The molar flow rate of the chlorine is readily adjusted to maximally utilize the BHP solution by significantly depleting the concentrations of active ions and molecules in the BHP solution. The molar flow rate of chlorine is preferably slightly less than that of the KOH or NaOH. Preferably, the chlorine molar flow rate is about 70% to about 120% of the KOH or NaOH molar flow rate. These molar flow rates result in nearly 100% utilization of the KOH (or NaOH) and chlorine. Due to the efficient utilization of the reactants, a BHP regeneration or recycling system is not necessary.
SOG 14 preferably includes a concave wall (relative to the laser nozzle 24) over which the BHP and chlorine are injected and react to produce singlet delta oxygen. After the reaction, spent BHP solution, comprising salts, small amounts of KOH or NaOH based ions and excess H2O2, exits SOG 14 through exhaust outlet 20 to a collection tank 22 for proper disposal. Due to the efficient utilization of chemicals according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is not necessary to recycle or regenerate the spent BHP solution after the reaction in SOG 14. Preferably, 90% or more of the BHP solution entering SOG 14 comprises non-recycled H2O2 and hydroxide compounds and most preferably the BHP solution comprises entirely new, non-recycled H2O2 and hydroxide compounds. Non-recycled refers to chemicals or compounds that have not been recycled from the spent solution exiting SOG 14 through outlet 20. Materials recycled from other processes may be used according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
SOG 14 is preferably part of a plenum feeding a laser nozzle 24 when SOG is used to produce O2(1Δ) for a COIL. An O2(1Δ) stream exits SOG 14 through nozzle 24 to feed a laser cavity 26. Iodine feed and injection systems for the COIL are not shown in
BHP from mixer 12 enters the generator 200 through BHP inlet 202. Preferably, inlet 202 has a rectangular cross section with an arbitrary width and length and with a height (h1) of about 5 mm or about 0.196 inches. The inlet 202 feeds the ramp 202, which has a converging section 206 and a diverging section 208. Preferably, the ramp 202 has a length (l1) of about 2.8 inches or about 714 mm, and the ramp 202 narrows to about 1.0 mm or 0.039 inches at approximately its midpoint and returns to its original height (h1) of about 5 mm. A porous inlet 36 is positioned along the diverging section 208 so as to introduce chlorine into the BHP, beginning the chemical reaction. Typically, the length of the porous inlet 36 matches the length of the diverging section 206, but it can also be longer or shorter than the diverging section 206. Additionally, porous wall 36 is typically made from a sintered metal, such as Nickel 200, or other materials like a porous plastic.
The injected chlorine vapor, in the form of small bubbles, rapidly mixes and reacts with the BHP solution while the flow is still passing over the concave wall. The chlorine vapor bubbles are approximately the same size as the diameter of the pores, preferably between about 0.2 μm (0.008 mil) and about 100 μm (4 mil), in porous wall 36. The chlorine bubbles are subjected to a large shearing force as they enter the BHP layer. The shearing force distorts the chlorine bubbles and helps result in a large contact surface area. The liquid-gas contact surface area according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention is significantly higher than in prior art SOG devices. The chlorine and BHP react and produce O2(1Δ) in a froth. According to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is not necessary to add any diluents, such as helium, to SOG 14, although diluents may be added.
Once the froth exits the froth generator 200, it travels along concave wall 30 and remains in substantial contact with this wall. The froth is partially held in place or collimated by a curved member 32 that is substantially parallel to the concave wall 30 such that the guide or curved member 32 and the concave wall 30 combine to form the froth channel 212. Preferably, the curved member 32 comprise plates that extend 0.5 cm to 1.0 cm from the side plates (not shown) to allow singlet delta oxygen to escape into the chamber 28 while containing the majority of the liquids comprising the froth. Preferably, the froth as it enters the froth channel 212 is generally uniform, avoiding layers of different densities and/or viscosities. Additionally, the high speed of injection of the froth results in a centrifugal force that prevents the aqueous solution from substantially separating from the concave wall 30. The centrifugal force is quite large since the BHP is a liquid, the flow speed is large and the radius of curvature of concave wall 30 is small.
One of the purposes for including the ramp 202 is to better control the Mach number as the froth approaches the concave wall 30. Typically, the froth has a very small speed of sound (generally about 15 m/s) when compared to the speed of sound at sea level (generally about 340 m/s). With SOGs that that introduce chlorine along the concave wall 30, the froth may be supersonic along the concave wall 30. Thus, as it reaches the nozzle throat 24, sudden deceleration of the supersonic flow causes a shock wave system to appear. The appearance of the shock wave system, in turn, causes the fluid to splatter and forces froth into the throat 24, resulting in the failure of the SOG 14.
When the Mach number of the froth is well controlled prior to entry into the froth channel 210, splatter is reduced. By having the ramp 202 in the froth generator 200, the Mach number of the froth as it exists the froth generator 200 is generally Mach 0.85 or less, which is a subsonic, well-controlled flow. Thus, the likelihood of splatter (as a result of a shock wave system) is reduced. Moreover, the chemical reaction between the BHP and the chlorine occurs prior to entry into the froth channel 212; thus, more singlet delta oxygen is generated prior to entry.
When the singlet delta oxygen forms vapor bubbles in the froth, it is generally uniformly distributed throughout the froth. Because of their low density relative to the liquid solution, the bubbles experience a significant pressure gradient, or buoyancy force associated with the centrifugal force of flow along concave wall 30, that is transverse to concave wall 30. This buoyancy force causes the low-density vapor bubbles to depart the froth in the direction of the nozzle throat 24. The centrifugal force also permits SOG 14 to operate in a zero-gravity or low gravity environment. This arrangement in combination with the high percentage utilization of up to 100% or nearly 100% of the chlorine in the BHP-chlorine reaction, results in little, if any, chlorine contamination of the O2(1Δ) stream. The O2(1Δ) stream departs SOG reaction chamber 28 through laser nozzle throat 24. A small percentage may leave through an outlet or exhaust duct. The laser nozzle is preferably a converging/diverging supersonic nozzle including a means for injecting iodine into the O2(1Δ), such as that described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/658,569 filed by Applicant on Sep. 9, 2003. Iodine feed and injections systems are not depicted in
Many factors control the rate at which the O2(1Δ) departs the liquid solution to exit through nozzle throat 24. As the reactants pass through SOG 14 very quickly, it is important that the O2(1Δ) depart the liquid solution quickly so that it does not remain entrained in the solution as the solution is exhausted to the collection tank 22. These factors include the injection speed of the froth, the average pore size in porous wall 36, the radius of curvature of concave wall 30 (which is nominally around 2.5 cm or 1 in), the angular extent of concave wall 30 (which is preferably less than 160° in extent), and the pressure inside reaction chamber 28. These factors are chosen iteratively, in conjunction with other design and performance constraints. For instance, sintered metal porous sheets are available in a range of thicknesses with a range of average pore sizes. As the average pore size decreases, the pressure change, for a given flow rate of chlorine, across the porous wall increases.
As soon as most, or all, of the generated O2(1Δ) has departed the BHP solution, the spent solution is removed from reaction chamber 28 by means of an exhaust duct or outlet 20. The spent solution is comprised of salt byproducts (KCl or NaCl), a small quantity of KOH or NaOH based ions and excess H2O2. It is preferred to remove the spent solution as quickly as possible with a smooth inlet for exhaust duct 20 that avoids splashing or aerosol formation that could contaminate the O2(1Δ) vapor stream. A suction pump in the exhaust may be used, if necessary, to assist with removal of the spent solution. The spent solution is stored in collection tank 22 for proper disposal; no BHP regeneration or recycling system is needed according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention.
The salt generated by the BHP-chlorine reaction remains dissolved in the highly dilute aqueous solution. The highspeed aqueous solution passes through reaction chamber 28 very quickly, preferably in fewer than about 20 milliseconds, more preferably in fewer than about 10 milliseconds, and most preferably in fewer than about 5 milliseconds. Inside reaction chamber 28, the temperature of the liquid increases due to exothermic reactions with the chlorine. Because the BHP solution contains added water and is cooled before it enters the reaction chamber, the magnitude of the temperature in the reaction chamber is minimized. A finite amount of time is required for the water vapor partial pressure to reach its equilibrium value with the post-reaction temperature of the aqueous solution. As the reactants pass through reaction chamber 28 very quickly, there may be insufficient time for the evaporation of liquid water to establish an equilibrium value for the water vapor at the post-reaction temperature, in the singlet delta oxygen exhaust stream. This factor, in combination with the reduction of the vapor pressure of the water by the solute, and the few milliseconds that the high-speed solution is located inside the reaction chamber, results in a low contamination level of the O2(1Δ) gas stream with water vapor. According to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is not necessary to use a water vapor trap prior to laser nozzle 24; however, a water vapor trap may be used if desired.
Preferably, the O2(1Δ) stream is substantially free of any contaminants, such as water vapor and chlorine vapor byproducts, at the inlet of the laser nozzle without any further processing, such as a water vapor trap, between the time the O2(1Δ) exits the reactant solution and enters the nozzle inlet. At the nozzle inlet, the O2(1Δ) stream preferably comprises about 60% yield or greater singlet delta oxygen, and more preferably comprises about 85% or greater, and most preferably comprises about 90% or greater singlet delta oxygen. Additionally, without having passed the O2(1Δ) stream through a water vapor trap, the O2(1Δ) stream preferably comprises less than about 15% water vapor at the nozzle inlet, and more preferably comprises less than about 10% water vapor at the nozzle inlet, and most preferably comprises less than about 5% water vapor at the nozzle inlet.
The pressure in reaction chamber 28 refers to the gaseous pressure of the O2(1Δ) plus the gas-phase byproducts, i.e., the total pressure. It would also include the pressure of diluent; in this invention diluent is not utilized, although it could be. Of the byproducts in chamber 28, the mole fraction of H2O and Cl2 is small. The amount of O2(3Σ) and O2(1Σ) depends on the yield. With a high yield, say 80% or more, the bulk of the gas is O2(1Δ).
The pressure in reaction chamber 28 may be as high as about 760 Torr (1 atmosphere), or even up to about 910 Torr (1.2 atm) or higher, without the addition of any diluent gases. For the use of SOG 14 to feed a COIL, the reaction chamber pressure is more preferably around 100 Torr to 400 Torr (0.13 atm to 0.52 atm). This pressure range for a COIL SOG also assists in the departure of the O2(1Δ) from the liquid solution, as compared to a significantly higher reactor pressure. These elevated pressures would result in collisional deactivation of the O2(1Δ) to the point where the gaseous stream no longer yields efficient laser action in prior art SOGs. Because of its compact, two-dimensional scalable configuration the SOG 14 according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention is preferably part of a plenum wall that directly feeds a converging/diverging nozzle of a laser. The O2(1Δ) generated in the BHP-chlorine reaction along the concave wall 30 need only travel a few centimeters, preferably about 10 cm (3.94 inches) or less, after departing the BHP-chlorine solution, which is preferably less than about 15 mm thick along concave wall 30, to reach the throat of the laser's nozzle 24 in the preferred embodiment. As seen in
A SOG according to a preferred embodiment of the invention yields O2(1Δ) at a higher rate than prior art SOGs. Due to deactivation while the O2(1Δ) is dissolved in the BHP solution, deactivation of walls and the dimol and pooling reactions for O2(1Δ), the yield of O2(1Δ) at the throat of a laser nozzle does not exceed about 50% in most prior art devices. Higher yield values are often cited for prior art devices, but these are upstream of the laser's nozzle throat. The dimol and pooling reactions are the dominant deactivation mechanisms and have driven prior art SOG systems to operate at low partial pressures for the O2(1Δ). However, according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, deactivation of O2(1Δ) according to the other mechanisms is reduced. For instance, the O2(1Δ) rapidly departs the BHP solution inside the reaction chamber, there is no need for a water vapor trap, and the generated O2(1Δ) need only travel a short distance to the laser nozzle's throat. These factors allow a SOG according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention to operate at high pressures while still resulting in a yield as high as 60% or greater.
In addition to operation at a high pressure and with improved yield, the SOG according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention has a number of additional major advantages over prior art SOG devices. These include: (1) it is scalable, (2) it can operate in a zero-gravity or low gravity environment, (3) no added diluent or buffer gas is used, (4) the chemicals are efficiently utilized and (5) the O2(1Δ) stream is substantially free of chlorine and water vapor contamination.
A SOG according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention was developed and tested in a feasibility experiment. A description of the test apparatus used in the feasibility experiment, and as depicted in
Water/nitrogen preliminary flow tests are first performed with nitrogen replacing chlorine and water replacing BHP. High-pressure nitrogen from nitrogen gas tank 40 is used to purge chlorine line 42 and tap water flows through BHP line 44 to perform this preliminary flow test.
BHP is prepared in a batch by first pouring distilled water into mixer 46, after which an aqueous H2O2 solution is added from H2O2 tank 48. Aqueous KOH is then allowed to slowly drip into mixer 46 from KOH tank 50. Both the H2O2 and KOH solutions are pre-cooled in a refrigerator. During mixing with the KOH, the contents of mixer 46 are cooled with liquid nitrogen from nitrogen tank 52. Liquid nitrogen flows through a heat exchanger 54 with vertical copper tubing for the cold nitrogen. The BHP temperature is monitored during preparation, and the KOH drip rate is adjusted to avoid overheating the BHP solution.
After the BHP has been prepared, a positive displacement pump 56, in BHP line 44 between mixer 46 and SOG 38, pumps BHP to SOG 38. The liquid chlorine tank 58 includes an eductor tube, which provides liquid chlorine to a heater 60 that gasifies it. Chlorine vapor passes through line 42 to SOG 38. The time duration of a test is determined by the amount of BHP that has been prepared and the flow rate of BHP during a test run.
Chlorine vapor flows through a converging nozzle 72, entering reaction chamber 62 through a narrow two-dimensional slit, or throat 74. Although it is preferred to use a porous wall to inject the chlorine into the reaction chamber according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, a nozzle configuration, as used in the feasibility experiment, may also be used. The BHP aqueous solution flows downward through a converging nozzle 76, entering reaction chamber 62 through a narrow, two-dimensional slit, or throat 78. The chlorine vapor enters reaction chamber 62 shortly after the BHP solution enters. The vapor and liquid mix and flow along a concave-curved wall 80. The reactant solution impacts an angled wall 82 that directs the liquid flow into an exhaust duct 70. A vapor exhaust 84, for exhausting O2(1Δ) gas, is located on the top side of SOG 38. The solution exiting through exhaust 70 flows to a collection tank 86 (as shown on
In a feasibility experiment for a SOG according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the BHP solution comprises a mixture of about 1 gallon (3.79 L) of distilled water, 1 gallon (3.79 L) of 30% aqueous H2O2, and 0.8 gallons (3 L) of 45% aqueous KOH. These volumes translate into H2O2, KOH, and H2O molar ratios of approximately 1:1:10, where the H2O value includes the aqueous portions of the H2O2 and KOH solutions and the added water. In contrast to BHP solutions used in prior art SOGs, this BHP solution is dilute.
The H2O2 and KOH solutions are pre-cooled in a refrigerator to a temperature below 32° F. During BHP preparation, which took about 50 minutes during the feasibility experiment, the BHP temperature is limited to a maximum value of 36° F. The BHP is preferably cooled not only during its preparation, but further cooled, if necessary, to a temperature slightly above its freezing point before injection into the reactor. Anomalous freezing of the BHP solution that has been problematic in prior art systems does not occur according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention due to the use of a relatively dilute BHP solution, such as used in the feasibility experiment. A test run begins within a few minutes after BHP preparation is completed. For the feasibility experiment, positive displacement pump 56 is set for a BHP flow rate of about 1.7 gpm (6.4 L/min), which provided a run time of about 1.5 minutes.
The slit 78 at the exit of BHP nozzle 76 is about 0.02 inches (0.05 cm), while the slit 74 at the exit of chlorine nozzle 72 is about 0.06 inches (0.15 cm). Vapor exhaust 84 is throttled such that the vacuum pressure inside reaction chamber 62, during the test, is only about 6-inches of water, or 0.21 psi, below the ambient atmospheric pressure. This translates to a reaction chamber pressure of about 14.5 psi (750 Torr) without the use of any gaseous diluents, which is significantly higher than typical prior art systems.
The presence of O2(1Δ) in SOG 38 in the feasibility experiment described was confirmed by a visual inspection through the clear side walls of SOG 38. An intense red dimol emission confirmed that the reaction produced O2(1Δ). The emission was noted during the experiment immediately after the BHP and chlorine began mixing. This indicates the rapidity with which the reaction takes place.
In addition to the parameters of the feasibility experiment described above, nominal values for key parameters of a SOG according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention are as follows. These values are not considered to be minimums, maximums, or optimum values and may be adjusted according to the desired scale of the system. A 1 m (3.3 ft) depth for the SOG coupled with a radius of curvature for the concave wall of 2.5 cm (1 inch), a BHP nozzle throat of about 1 mm (0.04 in), a laser nozzle throat height of about 1.58 cm (0.62 in) and a laser nozzle exit height of about 9.8 cm (3.9 in). For a 1 m (3.3 ft) depth dimension, the chemical flow rates are:
An improved SOG and its method of use are described according to the preferred embodiment of the present invention. It will be understood by those of skill in the art that variations in the components or arrangement of components described may be made within the scope of the invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/516,161, file Sep. 6, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,336,689 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/453,148, entitled “EFFICIENT METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING SINGLET DELTA OXYGEN AT AN ELEVATED PRESSURE” filed on Jun. 3, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,116,696, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/387,539, filed on Jun. 10, 2002. Each application is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2052869 | Coanda | Sep 1936 | A |
| 2108652 | Coanda | Feb 1938 | A |
| 2770501 | Coanda | Nov 1956 | A |
| 3047208 | Coanda | Jul 1962 | A |
| 3795367 | Mocarski | Mar 1974 | A |
| 3833356 | Luth | Sep 1974 | A |
| 4125361 | Bourn | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4146357 | Ward et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4246252 | McDermott et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4310502 | Wagner | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4318895 | Richardson et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4342116 | MacKnight et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4407282 | Swartz et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4448354 | Reznick et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4461756 | Rockenfeller | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4558451 | McDermott et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4640782 | Burleson et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4643889 | Uchiyama et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4653062 | Davis et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4668498 | Davis | May 1987 | A |
| 4718870 | Watts | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4780880 | Dickerson | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4785460 | Young | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4787091 | Wagner | Nov 1988 | A |
| 5023883 | Jacobs et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5093836 | Gole et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5110285 | Snyder et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5165606 | Pelet | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5378449 | Dinges | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5386941 | Haynes | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5392988 | Thayer, III | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5417928 | McDermott | May 1995 | A |
| 5516502 | Dickerson | May 1996 | A |
| 5529701 | Grisham et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5531904 | Grisham et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5607924 | Magda et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5624654 | Clendening, Jr. et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5658488 | Lonergan et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5658535 | Thayer, III | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5680765 | Choi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5810260 | Thomas | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5837206 | Traffenstedt et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5859863 | Clendening, Jr. et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5883916 | Lohn et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5925286 | Clendening, Jr. et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5974072 | Hartlove et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6072820 | Dickerson | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6099805 | Hartlove | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6154478 | Vetrovec | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6165424 | Clendening, Jr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6224786 | Stelman | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6302142 | Behrens | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6630105 | O'Neill et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 03104145 | Dec 2003 | WO |
| 2005095269 | Oct 2005 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070110117 A1 | May 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60387539 | Jun 2002 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10453148 | Jun 2003 | US |
| Child | 11516161 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11516161 | Sep 2006 | US |
| Child | 11614476 | US |
