Efficient selection of memory blocks for compaction

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8856475
  • Patent Number
    8,856,475
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 29, 2011
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 7, 2014
    11 years ago
Abstract
A method for storing data in a memory that includes multiple memory blocks, includes running a compaction process that selects one or more memory blocks containing both valid data and invalid data, copies the valid data from the selected memory blocks to other storage locations, and then erases the selected memory blocks. At least one memory block, which meets a criterion predictive of imminent invalidation of at least some of the data in the block, is identified. Selection of the identified memory block in the compaction process is inhibited.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to memory devices, and particularly to techniques for selecting memory blocks for compaction in non-volatile memory devices.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Some non-volatile memory devices, such as Flash devices, are divided into memory blocks that are erased en-bloc. Some memory systems carry out compaction processes, which compact valid data and free memory blocks for erasure and subsequent programming. Compaction is also sometimes referred to as “garbage collection.”


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An embodiment of the present invention that is described herein provides a method for storing data in a memory that includes multiple memory blocks. The method includes running a compaction process that selects one or more memory blocks containing both valid data and invalid data, copies the valid data from the selected memory blocks to other storage locations, and then erases the selected memory blocks. At least one memory block, which meets a criterion predictive of imminent invalidation of at least some of the data in the block, is identified. Selection of the identified memory block in the compaction process is inhibited.


In some embodiments, identifying the at least one memory block includes detecting a memory block in which data invalidation currently occurs. In an embodiment, identifying the at least one memory block includes detecting N memory blocks, N≧1, in which data invalidation occurred most recently among the multiple memory blocks. In a disclosed embodiment, identifying the at least one memory block includes detecting a memory block in which data invalidation occurred more recently than a predefined time out period.


In another embodiment, identifying the at least one memory block includes detecting a memory block in which multiple addresses have been invalidated sequentially. In yet another embodiment, identifying the at least one memory block includes detecting a memory block that contains more than a predefined amount of frequently-accessed data.


There is additionally provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a data storage apparatus including an interface and a processor. The interface is configured for communicating with a memory that includes multiple memory blocks. The processor is configured to run a compaction process that selects one or more memory blocks containing both valid data and invalid data, copies the valid data from the selected memory blocks to other storage locations, and then erases the selected memory blocks, to identify at least one memory block that meets a criterion predictive of imminent invalidation of at least some of the data in the block, and to inhibit selection of the identified memory block in the compaction process.


There is also provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a data storage apparatus including a memory and a processor. The memory includes multiple memory blocks. The processor is configured to run a compaction process that selects one or more memory blocks containing both valid data and invalid data, copies the valid data from the selected memory blocks to other storage locations, and then erases the selected memory blocks, to identify at least one memory block that meets a criterion predictive of imminent invalidation of at least some of the data in the block, and to inhibit selection of the identified memory block in the compaction process.


There is further provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a method for storing data in a memory that includes multiple memory blocks. The method includes running a compaction process that selects one or more source memory blocks containing both valid data and invalid data, copies the valid data from the source memory blocks to one or more destination memory blocks, and then erases the source memory blocks. Input data is accepted from a host for storage in the memory. A memory block that does not contain any data that was copied into the memory block by the compaction process is identified. The input data is stored in the identified memory block.


In some embodiments, running the compaction process includes fully populating the destination memory blocks with the valid data that was copied from the source memory blocks, so as to prevent storage of the input data accepted from the host in the destination memory blocks.


There is additionally provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a data storage apparatus including an interface and a processor. The interface is configured for communicating with a memory that includes multiple memory blocks. The processor is configured to run a compaction process that selects one or more source memory blocks containing both valid data and invalid data, copies the valid data from the source memory blocks to one or more destination memory blocks, and then erases the source memory blocks, to accept from a host input data for storage in the memory, to identify a memory block that does not contain any data that was copied into the memory block by the compaction process, and to store the input data in the identified memory block.


There is also provided, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a data storage apparatus including a memory and a processor. The memory includes multiple memory blocks. The processor is configured to run a compaction process that selects one or more source memory blocks containing both valid data and invalid data, copies the valid data from the source memory blocks to one or more destination memory blocks, and then erases the source memory blocks, to accept from a host input data for storage in the memory, to identify a memory block that does not contain any data that was copied into the memory block by the compaction process, and to store the input data in the identified memory block.


The present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of the embodiments thereof, taken together with the drawings in which:





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a block diagram that schematically illustrates a memory system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a flow chart that schematically illustrates a method for compaction, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and



FIG. 3 is a flow chart that schematically illustrates a method for data storage, in accordance with an alternative embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
Overview

Embodiments of the present invention that are described herein provide improved methods and systems for memory block compaction in non-volatile memory devices, such as Flash devices. In some embodiments, a memory controller stores data that is received from a host in a memory device. The memory device comprises multiple memory blocks, and each memory block stores multiple data pages. Typically, data is written to the memory device in page units, but erasure is applied to entire memory blocks. Data is written only to erased pages, and it is therefore not possible to update data in-place. Updating data involves writing the updated data to another physical storage location, marking the previous version of the data as invalid, and dynamically mapping logical addresses to physical storage locations.


Because of the above characteristics, the memory blocks of the memory device gradually accumulate invalid data pages, whose updated versions have been stored in other physical storage locations. In order to reduce the number of invalid pages, the memory controller carries out a compaction, or “garbage collection” process. This process selects one or more memory blocks for compaction, copies the valid data from the selected memory blocks to other storage locations, and then erases the selected memory blocks. The erased blocks are then ready for subsequent programming.


The efficiency of a given compaction process can be quantified by measuring the number of copy operations performed by the memory controller. This efficiently depends, among other factors, on the criteria used for selecting memory blocks for compaction. The methods and systems described herein select memory blocks for compaction in a manner that eliminates many unnecessary copy operations, and therefore improves compacting efficiency.


In some embodiments, the memory controller identifies one or more memory blocks in which data pages are likely to be invalidated imminently, and prevents these blocks from being selected for compaction. A memory block containing data that is about to be invalidated is typically not a good candidate for compaction, because some of the valid data that is to be copied from this block will soon be invalidated, thereby wasting copy operations. Therefore, it is desirable to refrain from selecting this block for compaction even though a large portion of the block may contain invalid data.


The memory controller typically uses a predefined criterion, which predicts whether data invalidation is imminent in a given memory block. Upon identifying one or more memory blocks that meet this criterion, the memory controller inhibits the identified memory blocks from being selected for compaction. Several example criteria are described herein. For example, when performing sequential programming, a memory block in which certain data addresses are currently being invalidated (e.g., updated in other physical storage locations) is likely to undergo additional data invalidation at other addresses in the near future, and is therefore not a good candidate for compaction.


In alternative embodiments, the memory controller stores input data received from the host in memory blocks that do not contain data that was copied into the blocks by the compaction process. In other words, the memory controller separates fresh host data from data that was produced by compaction. This technique helps to separate frequently-accessed (“hot”) data from rarely-accessed or static (“cold”) data. With this sort of separation, the data that requires compaction is concentrated in fewer memory blocks, and the compaction process is therefore improved.


The methods and systems described herein reduce the number of copy operations performed by the memory controller. Therefore, these techniques increase the efficiency of the compaction process and reduce the wear and stress on the memory device.


System Description


FIG. 1 is a block diagram that schematically illustrates a memory system 20, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. System 20 can be used in various host systems and devices, such as in computing devices, cellular phones or other communication terminals, removable memory modules (sometimes referred to as “USB Flash Drives”), Solid State Disks (SSD), digital cameras, music and other media players and/or any other system or device in which data is stored and retrieved.


System 20 comprises a memory device 24, which stores data in a memory cell array 28. The memory array comprises multiple memory blocks 34. Each memory block 34 comprises multiple analog memory cells 32. In the context of the present patent application and in the claims, the term “analog memory cell” is used to describe any memory cell that holds a continuous, analog value of a physical parameter, such as an electrical voltage or charge. Array 28 may comprise analog memory cells of any kind, such as, for example, NAND, NOR and Charge Trap Flash (CTF) Flash cells, phase change RAM (PRAM, also referred to as Phase Change Memory—PCM), Nitride Read Only Memory (NROM), Ferroelectric RAM (FRAM), magnetic RAM (MRAM) and/or Dynamic RAM (DRAM) cells.


The charge levels stored in the cells and/or the analog voltages or currents written into and read out of the cells are referred to herein collectively as analog values, analog storage values or storage values. The storage values may comprise, for example, threshold voltages or any other suitable kind of storage values. System 20 stores data in the analog memory cells by programming the cells to assume respective programming states, which are also referred to as programming levels. The programming states are selected from a finite set of possible states, and each programming state corresponds to a certain nominal storage value. For example, a 3 bit/cell MLC can be programmed to assume one of eight possible programming states by writing one of eight possible nominal storage values into the cell.


Memory device 24 comprises a reading/writing (R/W) unit 36, which converts data for storage in the memory device to analog storage values and writes them into memory cells 32. In alternative embodiments, the R/W unit does not perform the conversion, but is provided with voltage samples, i.e., with the storage values for storage in the cells. When reading data out of array 28, R/W unit 36 converts the storage values of memory cells into digital samples having a resolution of one or more bits. Data is typically written to and read from the memory cells in groups that are referred to as pages. In some embodiments, the R/W unit can erase a group of cells 32 by applying one or more negative erasure pulses to the cells. Erasure is typically performed in entire memory blocks.


The storage and retrieval of data in and out of memory device 24 is performed by a memory controller 40. The memory controller comprises an interface 44 for communicating with memory device 24, and a processor 48 that carries out the various memory management functions. In particular, processor 48 carries out an efficient memory block compaction process that is described herein.


Memory controller 40 communicates with a host 52, for accepting data for storage in the memory device and for outputting data retrieved from the memory device. Memory controller 40, and in particular processor 48, may be implemented in hardware. Alternatively, the memory controller may comprise a microprocessor that runs suitable software, or a combination of hardware and software elements.


The configuration of FIG. 1 is an exemplary system configuration, which is shown purely for the sake of conceptual clarity. Any other suitable memory system configuration can also be used. Elements that are not necessary for understanding the principles of the present invention, such as various interfaces, addressing circuits, timing and sequencing circuits and debugging circuits, have been omitted from the figure for clarity.


Although the example of FIG. 1 shows a single memory device 24, system 20 may comprise multiple memory devices that are controlled by memory controller 40. In the exemplary system configuration shown in FIG. 1, memory device 24 and memory controller 40 are implemented as two separate Integrated Circuits (ICs). In alternative embodiments, however, the memory device and the memory controller may be integrated on separate semiconductor dies in a single Multi-Chip Package (MCP) or System on Chip (SoC), and may be interconnected by an internal bus. Further alternatively, some or all of the memory controller circuitry may reside on the same die on which the memory array is disposed. Further alternatively, some or all of the functionality of memory controller 40 can be implemented in software and carried out by a processor or other element of the host system. In some embodiments, host 44 and memory controller 40 may be fabricated on the same die, or on separate dies in the same device package.


In some embodiments, memory controller 40 comprises a general-purpose processor, which is programmed in software to carry out the functions described herein. The software may be downloaded to the processor in electronic form, over a network, for example, or it may, alternatively or additionally, be provided and/or stored on non-transitory tangible media, such as magnetic, optical, or electronic memory.


In an example configuration of array 28, memory cells 32 are arranged in multiple rows and columns, and each memory cell comprises a floating-gate transistor. The gates of the transistors in each row are connected by word lines, and the sources of the transistors in each column are connected by bit lines. The memory array is typically divided into multiple pages, i.e., groups of memory cells that are programmed and read simultaneously. Pages are sometimes sub-divided into sectors. In some embodiments, each page comprises an entire row of the array. In alternative embodiments, each row (word line) can be divided into two or more pages. For example, in some devices each row is divided into two pages, one comprising the odd-order cells and the other comprising the even-order cells.


Typically, memory controller 40 programs data in page units, but erases entire memory blocks 34. Typically although not necessarily, a memory block is on the order of 106 memory cells, whereas a page is on the order of 103-104 memory cells.


Memory Block Compaction

As explained above, data can only be written to erased memory cells in memory device 24, and it is not possible to update data in-place. Therefore, system 20 uses logical-to-physical address mapping to manage the data storage locations in memory device 24. Typically, memory controller 40 receives from host 52 memory commands (e.g., read and write commands) that are specified using logical addresses. The memory controller maps the logical addresses to respective physical storage locations in memory device 24. When requested by the host to update the data in a certain logical address, the memory controller writes the updated data in an available (erased) physical storage location, updates the logical-to-physical address mapping to indicate the new physical storage location of the data, and marks the previous physical storage location of the data as invalid.


When using the above-described storage scheme, memory blocks 34 in device 24 gradually accumulate invalid pages, whose data has been updated in other pages in the memory device. Such invalid pages, sometimes referred to as “holes,” may be distributed in any way across the block and degrade the performance and capacity of system 20. In some embodiments, memory controller 40 carries out a compaction or “garbage collection” process, which eliminates invalid pages and clears memory blocks for erasure and subsequent programming.


In a typical compaction process, memory controller 40 selects one or more blocks to be compacted (sometimes referred to as “source blocks”). The selected memory blocks typically comprise both valid pages and invalid pages. The memory controller copies the valid pages from the selected memory blocks to other physical storage locations, typically to sequential erased pages in one or more other memory blocks (sometimes referred to as “destination blocks”). After copying the valid data, the memory controller updates the logical-to-physical address mapping to reflect the new physical storage locations of the data, and erases the selected memory blocks. As a result, the valid data from the selected blocks is written compactly in another location, and the selected blocks are erased and ready for new programming.


The compaction process performed by memory controller 40 involves copy operations of the valid data. The efficiency of the compaction process depends on the number of copy operations. It is desirable to reduce the number of copy operations, in order to reduce the computational and communication load of the memory controller and its interfaces, as well as reduce the wearing and endurance stress of memory cells 32.


Preventing Compaction of Memory Blocks in which Imminent Data Invalidation is Expected

The efficiency of the compaction process depends, among other factors, on the criteria used for selecting memory blocks for compaction. For example, it is possible in principle to select for compaction the blocks having the largest portion of invalid data. This criterion, however, does not guarantee high efficiency.


Consider, for example, a scenario in which the host operating system writes a body of data to a range of sequential logical addresses that have been used for sequential storage before. This sort of scenario occurs, for example, when a file (e.g., MP3, MP4 or JPEG file) has been deleted and a new file (e.g., MP3, MP4 or JPEG file) is now stored. In such a case, the host operating system sometimes does not notify the memory controller that the old memory area is not used. During such a process, the memory controller programs sequential pages in one memory block (with the data of the new file), while invalidating sequential pages in another memory block (the data of the old file).


At a certain point in time, the memory block in which sequential pages are currently being invalidated may contain a very high portion of invalid data. Nevertheless, this memory block is not a good candidate for compaction: Data that is presently valid in this block will soon be invalidated, and it is inefficient to waste copy operations for copying this data to another location.


The above scenario is described purely by way of example, in order to demonstrate that:


(i) selecting for compaction the memory block having the largest portion of invalid data is sometimes sub-optimal; and


(ii) it is usually inefficient to select for compaction a memory block in which data invalidation is expected to occur in the near future.


In some embodiments, memory controller 40 identifies one or more memory blocks in which data invalidation is predicted to occur imminently. The memory controller inhibits such memory blocks from being selected for compaction, even if they contain a high portion of invalid data. Instead, the memory controller reverts to select other memory blocks in which data invalidation is not imminent.


Memory controller 40 may use any suitable criterion for predicting whether data invalidation is likely to be imminent in a given memory block. In sequential programming, as described above, a memory block that currently undergoes data invalidation is considered likely to undergo additional data invalidation in the near future. Thus, in one embodiment, the memory controller prevents a memory block that currently undergoes data invalidation from being selected for compaction.


In another embodiment, the memory controller identifies the N memory blocks that most recently underwent data invalidation (N≧1), and prevents these N blocks from being selected for compaction. For example, the memory controller may manage a First-In-First-Out (FIFO) list that holds the indices of the N memory blocks in which data was most recently invalidated. The memory blocks on this list are prevented from being selected for compaction. Such a criterion may be useful, for example, for host operating systems or memory controller configurations that carry out N concurrent storage tasks. The value of N may be selected based on the known characteristics of the host operating system or memory controller configuration.


In yet another embodiment, the memory controller may define a certain time-out period after which the memory block may be selected for compaction. In other words, the memory controller permits a memory block to be selected for compaction only if the block did not undergo data invalidation during the last T seconds. In another embodiment, the memory controller may regard a block that contains “hot” data, i.e., frequently-accessed data, as a block that is likely to undergo imminent data invalidation. For example, the memory controller may regard a block as likely to undergo invalidation if the ratio between the number of frequently-accessed logical addresses (LBAs) and the total number of valid logical addresses in the block exceeds a certain threshold. Further alternatively, memory controller 40 may use any other suitable criterion for predicting which memory blocks are likely to undergo imminent data invalidation.



FIG. 2 is a flow chart that schematically illustrates a method for compaction, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The method begins with memory controller 40 identifying one or more memory blocks in which data invalidation is likely to be imminent, at an identification step 60. The memory controller marks the identified memory blocks as “not allowed for compaction,” at a marking step 64. The memory controller selects one or more memory blocks as candidates for compaction, at a selection step 68. For example, the memory controller may select the blocks containing the largest portion of invalid data.


The memory controller then checks whether any of the selected memory blocks is marked as not allowed for compaction, at a checking step 72. If all the selected memory blocks are permitted for compaction, the memory controller compacts these memory blocks at a compaction step 76. The method then loops back to step 60 above. Otherwise, i.e., if one or more of the selected memory blocks are marked as not allowed for compaction, the method loops back to step 68 above in which the memory controller replaces the marked block with alternative candidates.


The flow chart of FIG. 2 shows an example flow that demonstrates the use of the disclosed technique. In alternative embodiments, any other suitable flow can be used. For example, the memory controller may first select one or more memory blocks for compaction, then check whether data invalidation is likely to occur in any of the selected blocks, and re-select the candidates if necessary.


Separating Fresh Host Input Data from Data that was Produced by Compaction

In some embodiments, memory controller 40 stores fresh input data that is accepted from host 52 in memory blocks that do not contain any data that was produced by the compaction process. In other words, the memory controller separates fresh input data from data that was produced by compaction.


The rationale behind this technique is that the data received from the host is regarded as “hot” or frequently-accessed data, whereas data that was produced by compaction may comprise both frequently-accessed (“hot”) and rarely-accessed or static (“cold”) data. It is generally desirable to store frequently-accessed and rarely-accessed data in separate memory blocks, in order to concentrate the data that is likely to undergo compaction in a relatively small number of memory blocks. Separating the fresh input data from the data produced by compaction helps to separate “hot” data from “cold” data, thereby improving the compaction process.



FIG. 3 is a flow chart that schematically illustrates a method for data storage, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The method begins with memory controller 40 identifying or assigning memory blocks that do not contain any data that was copied into the blocks by the compaction process, at a fresh block definition step 80. The memory controller accepts input data for storage from host 52, at an input step 84. The memory controller selects an address for storing the input data in one of the memory blocks that were assigned or identified at step 80 above, at an address selection step 88. The memory controller then stores the input data in the selected address, at a storage step 92.


In various embodiments, memory controller 40 may use various techniques for causing fresh host data to be stored in blocks that do not contain data produced by compaction. For example, the memory controller may fully-populate the destination blocks during the compaction process, without leaving any empty pages that are available for storage. Since the destination blocks are fully-populated with data that was copied by the compaction process, fresh host data cannot be stored in these blocks.


Although the embodiments described herein mainly address compaction processes that are performed at page granularity, the methods and systems described herein can also be used with any other suitable kind of compaction processes, such as in processes that copy and invalidate data items that occupy only parts of a page.


It will thus be appreciated that the embodiments described above are cited by way of example, and that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and sub-combinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description and which are not disclosed in the prior art. Documents incorporated by reference in the present patent application are to be considered an integral part of the application except that to the extent any terms are defined in these incorporated documents in a manner that conflicts with the definitions made explicitly or implicitly in the present specification, only the definitions in the present specification should be considered.

Claims
  • 1. A method for storing data in a memory that includes multiple memory blocks, the method comprising: selecting one or more memory blocks for compaction, wherein each one of the one or more memory blocks includes both valid data and invalid data;determining a number of accesses of each logical address for each memory block of the one or more memory blocks;determining one or more frequently-accessed logical addresses of each memory block of the one or more memory blocks dependent upon the number of accesses of each logical address;identifying at least one of the one or more memory blocks responsive to a determination that a ratio of a number of the one or more frequently-accessed logical addresses of the at least one of one or more memory blocks and a total number of valid logical addresses in the at least one of the one or more memory blocks is greater than a predetermined threshold; andcompacting the selected one or more memory blocks excluding the identified at least one of the one or more memory blocks.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one memory block comprises data currently being invalidated.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one of the one or more memory blocks comprises data wherein invalidation occurred more recently than a predefined time out period.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one of the one or more memory blocks comprises multiple addresses that have been invalidated sequentially.
  • 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the at least one of the one or more memory blocks comprises an amount of frequently-accessed data greater than a predefined amount.
  • 6. A data storage apparatus, comprising: an interface for communicating with a memory that includes multiple memory blocks; anda processor, which is configured to: select one or more memory blocks for compaction, wherein each one of the one or more memory blocks includes both valid data and invalid data;determine a number of accesses of each logical address for each memory block of the one or more memory blocks;determine one or more frequently-accessed logical addresses of each memory block of the one or more memory blocks dependent upon the number of accesses of each logical address;identify at least one of the one or more memory blocks responsive to a determination that a ratio of a number of the one or more frequently-accessed logical addresses of the at least one of the one or more memory blocks and a total number of valid logical addresses in the at least one of the one or more memory blocks is greater than a predetermined threshold; andcompact the selected one or more memory blocks excluding the identified at least one of the one or more memory blocks.
  • 7. The apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the at least one of the one or more memory blocks includes data which is currently being invalidated.
  • 8. The apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the at least one of the one or more memory blocks includes data wherein invalidation occurred more recently than a predefined time out period.
  • 9. The apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the at least one of the one or more memory blocks includes multiple addresses that have been invalidated sequentially.
  • 10. The apparatus according to claim 6, wherein the at least one of the one or more memory blocks includes an amount of frequently-accessed data greater than a predefined amount.
  • 11. A data storage apparatus, comprising: a memory comprising multiple memory blocks; anda processor, which is configured to:select one or more memory blocks for compaction, wherein each one of the one or more memory blocks includes both valid data and invalid data;determine a number of accesses of each logical address for each memory block of the one or more memory blocks;determine one or more frequently-accessed logical addresses of each memory block of the one or more memory blocks dependent upon the number of accesses of each logical address;identify at least one of the one or more memory blocks responsive to a determination that a ratio of a number of the one or more frequently-accessed logical addresses of the at least one of the one or more memory blocks and a total number of valid logical addresses in the at least one block of the one or more memory blocks is greater than a predetermined threshold; andcompact each memory block of the selected one or more memory blocks excluding the identified at least one of the one or more memory blocks.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/369,719, filed Aug. 1, 2010, whose disclosure is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (576)
Number Name Date Kind
3668631 Griffith et al. Jun 1972 A
3668632 Oldham Jun 1972 A
4058851 Scheuneman Nov 1977 A
4112502 Scheuneman Sep 1978 A
4394763 Nagano et al. Jul 1983 A
4413339 Riggle et al. Nov 1983 A
4556961 Iwahashi et al. Dec 1985 B1
4558431 Satoh Dec 1985 B1
4608687 Dutton Aug 1986 A
4654847 Dutton Mar 1987 A
4661929 Aoki et al. Apr 1987 B1
4768171 Tada Aug 1988 B1
4811285 Walker et al. Mar 1989 B1
4899342 Potter et al. Feb 1990 B1
4910706 Hyatt Mar 1990 B1
4993029 Galbraith et al. Feb 1991 A
5056089 Furuta et al. Oct 1991 A
5077722 Geist et al. Dec 1991 A
5126808 Montalvo et al. Jun 1992 A
5163021 Mehrotra et al. Nov 1992 A
5172338 Mehrotta et al. Dec 1992 B1
5182558 Mayo Jan 1993 A
5182752 DeRoo et al. Jan 1993 A
5191584 Anderson Mar 1993 A
5200959 Gross et al. Apr 1993 B1
5237535 Mielke et al. Aug 1993 B1
5272669 Samachisa et al. Dec 1993 B1
5276649 Hoshita et al. Jan 1994 B1
5287469 Tsuboi Feb 1994 A
5365484 Cleveland et al. Nov 1994 A
5388064 Khan Feb 1995 B1
5416646 Shirai May 1995 A
5416782 Wells et al. May 1995 A
5446854 Khalidi et al. Aug 1995 A
5450424 Okugaki et al. Sep 1995 A
5469444 Endoh et al. Nov 1995 A
5473753 Wells et al. Dec 1995 B1
5479170 Cauwenberghs et al. Dec 1995 B1
5508958 Fazio et al. Apr 1996 B1
5519831 Holzhammer May 1996 B1
5532962 Auclair et al. Jul 1996 A
5533190 Binford et al. Jul 1996 A
5541886 Hasbun Jul 1996 B1
5600677 Citta et al. Feb 1997 B1
5638320 Wong et al. Jun 1997 A
5657332 Auclair et al. Aug 1997 A
5657332 Auclair et al. Aug 1997 B1
5675540 Roohparvar Oct 1997 B1
5682352 Wong et al. Oct 1997 A
5687114 Khan Nov 1997 A
5696717 Koh Dec 1997 B1
5726649 Tamaru et al. Mar 1998 B1
5726934 Tran et al. Mar 1998 A
5742752 De Koning Apr 1998 A
5748533 Dunlap et al. May 1998 A
5748534 Dunlap et al. May 1998 A
5751637 Chen et al. May 1998 B1
5761402 Kaneda et al. Jun 1998 A
5798966 Keeney Aug 1998 A
5799200 Brant et al. Aug 1998 A
5801985 Roohparvar et al. Sep 1998 B1
5838832 Barnsley Nov 1998 B1
5860106 Domen et al. Jan 1999 B1
5867114 Barbir Feb 1999 A
5867428 Ishii et al. Feb 1999 A
5867429 Chen et al. Feb 1999 A
5867429 Chen et al. Feb 1999 B1
5877986 Harari et al. Mar 1999 B1
5889937 Tamagawa Mar 1999 A
5901089 Korsh et al. May 1999 B1
5909449 So et al. Jun 1999 B1
5912906 Wu et al. Jun 1999 B1
5930167 Lee et al. Jul 1999 B1
5937424 Leak et al. Aug 1999 A
5942004 Cappelletti Aug 1999 B1
5946716 Karp et al. Aug 1999 A
5969986 Wong et al. Oct 1999 A
5982668 Ishii et al. Nov 1999 A
5991517 Harari et al. Nov 1999 B1
5995417 Chen et al. Nov 1999 A
6009014 Hollmer et al. Dec 1999 B1
6009016 Ishii et al. Dec 1999 A
6023425 Ishii et al. Feb 2000 A
6034891 Norman Mar 2000 B1
6040993 Chen et al. Mar 2000 A
6041430 Yamauchi Mar 2000 B1
6073204 Lakhani et al. Jun 2000 B1
6101614 Gonzales et al. Aug 2000 B1
6128237 Shirley et al. Oct 2000 B1
6134140 Tanaka et al. Oct 2000 A
6134140 Tanaka et al. Oct 2000 B1
6134143 Norman Oct 2000 B1
6134631 Jennings Oct 2000 B1
6141261 Patti Oct 2000 A
6151246 So et al. Nov 2000 A
6157573 Ishii et al. Dec 2000 A
6166962 Chen et al. Dec 2000 B1
6169691 Pasotti et al. Jan 2001 B1
6178466 Gilbertson et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185134 Tanaka et al. Feb 2001 B1
6209113 Roohparvar Mar 2001 B1
6212654 Lou et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219276 Parker Apr 2001 B1
6219447 Lee et al. Apr 2001 B1
6222762 Guterman et al. Apr 2001 B1
6230233 Lofgren et al. May 2001 B1
6240458 Gilbertson May 2001 B1
6259627 Wong Jul 2001 B1
6275419 Guterman et al. Aug 2001 B1
6278632 Chevallier Aug 2001 B1
6279069 Robinson et al. Aug 2001 B1
6288944 Kawamura Sep 2001 B1
6292394 Cohen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6301151 Engh et al. Oct 2001 B1
6304486 Yano Oct 2001 B1
6307776 So et al. Oct 2001 B1
6314044 Sasaki et al. Nov 2001 B1
6317363 Guterman et al. Nov 2001 B1
6317364 Guterman et al. Nov 2001 B1
6345004 Omura et al. Feb 2002 B1
6360346 Miyauchi et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363008 Wong Mar 2002 B1
6363454 Lakhani et al. Mar 2002 B1
6366496 Torelli et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385092 Ishii et al. May 2002 B1
6392932 Ishii et al. May 2002 B1
6396742 Korsh et al. May 2002 B1
6397364 Barkan May 2002 B1
6405323 Lin et al. Jun 2002 B1
6405342 Lee Jun 2002 B1
6418060 Yang et al. Jul 2002 B1
6442585 Dean et al. Aug 2002 B1
6445602 Kokudo et al. Sep 2002 B1
6452838 Ishii et al. Sep 2002 B1
6456528 Chen Sep 2002 B1
6466476 Wong et al. Oct 2002 B1
6467062 Barkan Oct 2002 B1
6469931 Ban et al. Oct 2002 B1
6480948 Virajpet et al. Nov 2002 B1
6490236 Fukuda et al. Dec 2002 B1
6522580 Chen et al. Feb 2003 B2
6525952 Araki et al. Feb 2003 B2
6532556 Wong et al. Mar 2003 B1
6538922 Khalid et al. Mar 2003 B1
6549464 Tanaka et al. Apr 2003 B2
6553510 Pekny et al. Apr 2003 B1
6558967 Wong May 2003 B1
6560152 Cernea May 2003 B1
6567311 Ishii et al. May 2003 B2
6577539 Iwahashi Jun 2003 B2
6584012 Banks Jun 2003 B2
6615307 Roohparvar Sep 2003 B1
6621739 Gonzalez et al. Sep 2003 B2
6640326 Buckingham et al. Oct 2003 B1
6643169 Rudelic et al. Nov 2003 B2
6646913 Micheloni et al. Nov 2003 B2
6678192 Gongwer et al. Jan 2004 B2
6683811 Ishii et al. Jan 2004 B2
6687155 Nagasue Feb 2004 B2
6707748 Lin et al. Mar 2004 B2
6708257 Bao Mar 2004 B2
6714449 Khalid Mar 2004 B2
6717847 Chen Apr 2004 B2
6731557 Beretta May 2004 B2
6732250 Durrant May 2004 B2
6738293 Iwahashi May 2004 B1
6751766 Guterman et al. Jun 2004 B2
6757193 Chen et al. Jun 2004 B2
6774808 Hibbs et al. Aug 2004 B1
6781877 Cernea et al. Aug 2004 B2
6804805 Rub Oct 2004 B2
6807095 Chen et al. Oct 2004 B2
6807101 Ooishi et al. Oct 2004 B2
6809964 Moschopoulos et al. Oct 2004 B2
6819592 Noguchi et al. Nov 2004 B2
6829167 Tu et al. Dec 2004 B2
6845052 Ho et al. Jan 2005 B1
6851018 Wyatt et al. Feb 2005 B2
6851081 Yamamoto Feb 2005 B2
6856546 Guterman et al. Feb 2005 B2
6862218 Guterman et al. Mar 2005 B2
6870767 Rudelic et al. Mar 2005 B2
6870773 Noguchi et al. Mar 2005 B2
6873552 Ishii et al. Mar 2005 B2
6879520 Hosono et al. Apr 2005 B2
6882567 Wong Apr 2005 B1
6894926 Guterman et al. May 2005 B2
6907497 Hosono et al. Jun 2005 B2
6925009 Noguchi et al. Aug 2005 B2
6930925 Guo et al. Aug 2005 B2
6934188 Roohparvar Aug 2005 B2
6937511 Hsu et al. Aug 2005 B2
6958938 Noguchi et al. Oct 2005 B2
6963505 Cohen Nov 2005 B2
6972993 Conley et al. Dec 2005 B2
6988175 Lasser Jan 2006 B2
6992932 Cohen Jan 2006 B2
6999344 Hosono et al. Feb 2006 B2
7002843 Guterman et al. Feb 2006 B2
7006379 Noguchi et al. Feb 2006 B2
7012835 Gonzalez et al. Mar 2006 B2
7020017 Chen et al. Mar 2006 B2
7023735 Ban et al. Apr 2006 B2
7031210 Park et al. Apr 2006 B2
7031214 Tran Apr 2006 B2
7031216 You Apr 2006 B2
7039846 Hewitt et al. May 2006 B2
7042766 Wang et al. May 2006 B1
7054193 Wong May 2006 B1
7054199 Lee et al. May 2006 B2
7057958 So et al. Jun 2006 B2
7065147 Ophir et al. Jun 2006 B2
7068539 Guterman et al. Jun 2006 B2
7071849 Zhang Jul 2006 B2
7072222 Ishii et al. Jul 2006 B2
7079555 Baydar et al. Jul 2006 B2
7088615 Guterman et al. Aug 2006 B2
7099194 Tu et al. Aug 2006 B2
7102924 Chen et al. Sep 2006 B2
7113432 Mokhlesi Sep 2006 B2
7130210 Bathul et al. Oct 2006 B2
7139192 Wong Nov 2006 B1
7139198 Guterman et al. Nov 2006 B2
7145805 Ishii et al. Dec 2006 B2
7151692 Wu Dec 2006 B2
7158058 Yu Jan 2007 B1
7170781 So et al. Jan 2007 B2
7170802 Cernea et al. Jan 2007 B2
7173859 Hemink Feb 2007 B2
7177184 Chen Feb 2007 B2
7177195 Gonzalez et al. Feb 2007 B2
7177199 Chen et al. Feb 2007 B2
7177200 Ronen et al. Feb 2007 B2
7184338 Nagakawa et al. Feb 2007 B2
7187195 Kim Mar 2007 B2
7187592 Guterman et al. Mar 2007 B2
7190614 Wu Mar 2007 B2
7193898 Cernea Mar 2007 B2
7193921 Choi et al. Mar 2007 B2
7196644 Anderson et al. Mar 2007 B1
7196928 Chen Mar 2007 B2
7196933 Shibata Mar 2007 B2
7197594 Raz et al. Mar 2007 B2
7200062 Kinsely et al. Apr 2007 B2
7210077 Brandenberger et al. Apr 2007 B2
7221592 Nazarian May 2007 B2
7224613 Chen et al. May 2007 B2
7231474 Helms et al. Jun 2007 B1
7231562 Ohlhoff et al. Jun 2007 B2
7243275 Gongwer et al. Jul 2007 B2
7254690 Rao Aug 2007 B2
7254763 Aadsen et al. Aug 2007 B2
7257027 Park Aug 2007 B2
7259987 Chen et al. Aug 2007 B2
7266026 Gongwer et al. Sep 2007 B2
7266069 Chu Sep 2007 B2
7269066 Nguyen et al. Sep 2007 B2
7272757 Stocken Sep 2007 B2
7274611 Roohparvar Sep 2007 B2
7277355 Tanzawa Oct 2007 B2
7280398 Lee et al. Oct 2007 B1
7280409 Misumi et al. Oct 2007 B2
7280415 Hwang et al. Oct 2007 B2
7283399 Ishii et al. Oct 2007 B2
7289344 Chen Oct 2007 B2
7301807 Khalid et al. Nov 2007 B2
7301817 Li et al. Nov 2007 B2
7308525 Lasser et al. Dec 2007 B2
7310255 Chan Dec 2007 B2
7310269 Shibata Dec 2007 B2
7310271 Lee Dec 2007 B2
7310272 Mokhlesi et al. Dec 2007 B1
7310347 Lasser Dec 2007 B2
7312727 Feng et al. Dec 2007 B1
7321509 Chen et al. Jan 2008 B2
7328384 Kulkarni et al. Feb 2008 B1
7342831 Mokhlesi et al. Mar 2008 B2
7343330 Boesjes et al. Mar 2008 B1
7345924 Nguyen et al. Mar 2008 B2
7345928 Li Mar 2008 B2
7349263 Kim et al. Mar 2008 B2
7356755 Fackenthal Apr 2008 B2
7363420 Lin et al. Apr 2008 B2
7365671 Anderson Apr 2008 B1
7388781 Litsyn et al. Jun 2008 B2
7397697 So et al. Jul 2008 B2
7405974 Yaoi et al. Jul 2008 B2
7405979 Ishii et al. Jul 2008 B2
7408804 Hemink et al. Aug 2008 B2
7408810 Aritome et al. Aug 2008 B2
7409473 Conley et al. Aug 2008 B2
7409623 Baker et al. Aug 2008 B2
7420847 Li Sep 2008 B2
7433231 Aritome Oct 2008 B2
7433697 Karaoguz et al. Oct 2008 B2
7434111 Sugiura et al. Oct 2008 B2
7437498 Ronen Oct 2008 B2
7440324 Mokhlesi Oct 2008 B2
7440331 Hemink Oct 2008 B2
7441067 Gorobetz et al. Oct 2008 B2
7447970 Wu et al. Nov 2008 B2
7450421 Mokhlesi et al. Nov 2008 B2
7453737 Ha Nov 2008 B2
7457163 Hemink Nov 2008 B2
7457897 Lee et al. Nov 2008 B1
7460410 Nagai et al. Dec 2008 B2
7460412 Lee et al. Dec 2008 B2
7466592 Mitani et al. Dec 2008 B2
7468907 Kang et al. Dec 2008 B2
7468911 Lutze et al. Dec 2008 B2
7469049 Feng Dec 2008 B1
7471581 Tran et al. Dec 2008 B2
7483319 Brown Jan 2009 B2
7487329 Hepkin et al. Feb 2009 B2
7487394 Forhan et al. Feb 2009 B2
7492641 Hosono et al. Feb 2009 B2
7508710 Mokhlesi Mar 2009 B2
7526711 Orio Apr 2009 B2
7539061 Lee May 2009 B2
7539062 Doyle May 2009 B2
7551492 Kim Jun 2009 B2
7558109 Brandman et al. Jul 2009 B2
7558839 McGovern Jul 2009 B1
7568135 Cornwell et al. Jul 2009 B2
7570520 Kamei et al. Aug 2009 B2
7574555 Porat et al. Aug 2009 B2
7590002 Mokhlesi et al. Sep 2009 B2
7593259 Kim Sep 2009 B2
7594093 Kancherla Sep 2009 B1
7596707 Vemula Sep 2009 B1
7609787 Jahan et al. Oct 2009 B2
7613043 Cornwell et al. Nov 2009 B2
7616498 Mokhlesi et al. Nov 2009 B2
7619918 Aritome Nov 2009 B2
7631245 Lasser Dec 2009 B2
7633798 Sarin et al. Dec 2009 B2
7633802 Mokhlesi Dec 2009 B2
7639532 Roohparvar et al. Dec 2009 B2
7644347 Alexander et al. Jan 2010 B2
7656734 Thorp et al. Feb 2010 B2
7660158 Aritome Feb 2010 B2
7660183 Ware et al. Feb 2010 B2
7661000 Ueda et al. Feb 2010 B2
7661054 Huffman et al. Feb 2010 B2
7665007 Yang et al. Feb 2010 B2
7680987 Clark et al. Mar 2010 B1
7733712 Walston et al. Jun 2010 B1
7742351 Inoue et al. Jun 2010 B2
7761624 Karamcheti et al. Jul 2010 B2
7797609 Neuman Sep 2010 B2
7810017 Radke Oct 2010 B2
7848149 Gonzalez et al. Dec 2010 B2
7869273 Lee et al. Jan 2011 B2
7885119 Li Feb 2011 B2
7904783 Brandman et al. Mar 2011 B2
7924613 Sommer Apr 2011 B1
7925936 Sommer Apr 2011 B1
7928497 Yaegashi Apr 2011 B2
7929549 Talbot Apr 2011 B1
7930515 Gupta et al. Apr 2011 B2
7945825 Cohen et al. May 2011 B2
7978516 Olbrich et al. Jul 2011 B2
8014094 Jin Sep 2011 B1
8037380 Cagno et al. Oct 2011 B2
8040744 Gorobets et al. Oct 2011 B2
8065583 Radke Nov 2011 B2
20010002172 Tanaka et al. May 2001 A1
20010006479 Ikehashi et al. Jul 2001 A1
20020038440 Barkan Mar 2002 A1
20020056064 Kidorf et al. May 2002 A1
20020118574 Gongwer et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020133684 Anderson Sep 2002 A1
20020166091 Kidorf et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020174295 Ulrich et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020196510 Hietala et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030002348 Chen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030103400 Van Tran Jun 2003 A1
20030161183 Tran Aug 2003 A1
20030189856 Cho et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040057265 Mirabel et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040057285 Cernea et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040083333 Chang et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040083334 Chang et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040105311 Cernea et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040114437 Li Jun 2004 A1
20040160842 Fukiage Aug 2004 A1
20040223371 Roohparvar Nov 2004 A1
20050007802 Gerpheide Jan 2005 A1
20050013165 Ban Jan 2005 A1
20050024941 Lasser et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050024978 Ronen Feb 2005 A1
20050030788 Parkinson et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050086574 Fackenthal Apr 2005 A1
20050121436 Kamitani et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144361 Gonzalez et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050157555 Ono et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050162913 Chen Jul 2005 A1
20050169051 Khalid et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050189649 Maruyama et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050213393 Lasser Sep 2005 A1
20050224853 Ohkawa Oct 2005 A1
20050240745 Iyer et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050243626 Ronen Nov 2005 A1
20060004952 Lasser Jan 2006 A1
20060028875 Avraham et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060028877 Meir Feb 2006 A1
20060101193 Murin May 2006 A1
20060106972 Gorobets et al. May 2006 A1
20060107136 Gongwer et al. May 2006 A1
20060129750 Lee et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060133141 Gorobets Jun 2006 A1
20060156189 Tomlin Jul 2006 A1
20060179334 Brittain et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190699 Lee Aug 2006 A1
20060203546 Lasser Sep 2006 A1
20060218359 Sanders et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060221692 Chen Oct 2006 A1
20060221705 Hemink et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060221714 Li et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060239077 Park et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060239081 Roohparvar Oct 2006 A1
20060256620 Nguyen et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060256626 Werner et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060256891 Yuan et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060271748 Jain et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060285392 Incarnati et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060285396 Ha Dec 2006 A1
20070006013 Moshayedi et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070019481 Park Jan 2007 A1
20070033581 Tomlin et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070047314 Goda et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070047326 Nguyen et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070050536 Kolokowsky Mar 2007 A1
20070058446 Hwang et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061502 Lasser et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067667 Ikeuchi et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070074093 Lasser Mar 2007 A1
20070086239 Litsyn et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070086260 Sinclair Apr 2007 A1
20070089034 Litsyn et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070091677 Lasser et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070091694 Lee et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070103978 Conley et al. May 2007 A1
20070103986 Chen May 2007 A1
20070104211 Opsasnick May 2007 A1
20070109845 Chen May 2007 A1
20070109849 Chen May 2007 A1
20070115726 Cohen et al. May 2007 A1
20070118713 Guterman et al. May 2007 A1
20070143378 Gorobetz Jun 2007 A1
20070143531 Atri Jun 2007 A1
20070159889 Kang et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070159892 Kang et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070159907 Kwak Jul 2007 A1
20070168837 Murin Jul 2007 A1
20070171714 Wu et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070183210 Choi et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070189073 Aritome Aug 2007 A1
20070195602 Fong et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070206426 Mokhlesi Sep 2007 A1
20070208904 Hsieh et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070226599 Motwani Sep 2007 A1
20070236990 Aritome Oct 2007 A1
20070253249 Kang et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070256620 Viggiano et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070263455 Cornwell et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070266232 Rodgers et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070271424 Lee et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070280000 Fujiu et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070291571 Balasundaram Dec 2007 A1
20070297234 Cernea et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080010395 Mylly et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080025121 Tanzawa Jan 2008 A1
20080043535 Roohparvar Feb 2008 A1
20080049504 Kasahara et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080049506 Guterman Feb 2008 A1
20080052446 Lasser et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080055993 Lee Mar 2008 A1
20080080243 Edahiro et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080082730 Kim et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080089123 Chae et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080104309 Cheon et al. May 2008 A1
20080104312 Lasser May 2008 A1
20080109590 Jung et al. May 2008 A1
20080115017 Jacobson May 2008 A1
20080123420 Brandman et al. May 2008 A1
20080123426 Lutze et al. May 2008 A1
20080126686 Sokolov et al. May 2008 A1
20080130341 Shalvi et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080148115 Sokolov et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080151618 Sharon et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080151667 Miu et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080158958 Sokolov et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080181001 Shalvi Jul 2008 A1
20080198650 Shalvi et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080198654 Toda Aug 2008 A1
20080209116 Caulkins Aug 2008 A1
20080209304 Winarski et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080215798 Sharon et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080219050 Shalvi et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080239093 Easwar et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080239812 Abiko et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080253188 Aritome Oct 2008 A1
20080263262 Sokolov et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263676 Mo et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080270730 Lasser et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080282106 Shalvi et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080288714 Salomon et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090013233 Radke Jan 2009 A1
20090024905 Shalvi et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090034337 Aritome Feb 2009 A1
20090043831 Antonopoulos et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090043951 Shalvi et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090049234 Oh et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090073762 Lee et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090086542 Lee et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090089484 Chu Apr 2009 A1
20090091979 Shalvi Apr 2009 A1
20090094930 Schwoerer Apr 2009 A1
20090106485 Anholt Apr 2009 A1
20090112949 Ergan et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090132755 Radke May 2009 A1
20090144600 Perlmutter et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090150894 Huang et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090157950 Selinger Jun 2009 A1
20090157964 Kasorla et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090158126 Perlmutter et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090168524 Golov et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090172257 Prins et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090172261 Prins et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090193184 Yu et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090199074 Sommer et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090204824 Lin et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090204872 Yu et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090213653 Perlmutter et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090213654 Perlmutter et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090225595 Kim Sep 2009 A1
20090228761 Perlmutter et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090240872 Perlmutter et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090265509 Klein Oct 2009 A1
20090300227 Nochimowski et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090323412 Mokhlesi et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090327608 Eschmann Dec 2009 A1
20100017650 Chin et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100034022 Dutta et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100057976 Lasser Mar 2010 A1
20100061151 Miwa et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100082883 Chen et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100083247 Kanevsky et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100110580 Takashima May 2010 A1
20100124088 Shalvi et al. May 2010 A1
20100131697 Alrod et al. May 2010 A1
20100131827 Sokolov et al. May 2010 A1
20100142268 Aritome Jun 2010 A1
20100142277 Yang et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100157675 Shalvi et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100165689 Rotbard et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100169547 Ou Jul 2010 A1
20100169743 Vogan et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100174847 Paley et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100195390 Shalvi Aug 2010 A1
20100199150 Shalvi et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100211803 Lablans Aug 2010 A1
20100220509 Sokolov et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100220510 Shalvi Sep 2010 A1
20100250836 Sokolov et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100287217 Borchers et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110010489 Yeh Jan 2011 A1
20110060969 Ramamoorthy et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066793 Burd Mar 2011 A1
20110075482 Shepard et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110107049 Kwon et al. May 2011 A1
20110149657 Haratsch et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110199823 Bar-Or et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110264843 Haines et al. Oct 2011 A1
20110302354 Miller Dec 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (43)
Number Date Country
0783754 Jul 1997 EP
1434236 Jun 2004 EP
1605509 Dec 2005 EP
9610256 Apr 1996 WO
9828745 Jul 1998 WO
02100112 Dec 2002 WO
03100791 Dec 2003 WO
2007046084 Apr 2007 WO
2007132452 Nov 2007 WO
2007132453 Nov 2007 WO
2007132456 Nov 2007 WO
2007132457 Nov 2007 WO
2007132458 Nov 2007 WO
2007146010 Dec 2007 WO
2008026203 Mar 2008 WO
2008053472 May 2008 WO
2008053473 May 2008 WO
2008068747 Jun 2008 WO
2008077284 Jul 2008 WO
2008083131 Jul 2008 WO
2008099958 Aug 2008 WO
2008111058 Sep 2008 WO
2008124760 Oct 2008 WO
2008139441 Nov 2008 WO
2009037691 Mar 2009 WO
2009037697 Mar 2009 WO
2009038961 Mar 2009 WO
2009050703 Apr 2009 WO
2009053961 Apr 2009 WO
2009053962 Apr 2009 WO
2009053963 Apr 2009 WO
2009063450 May 2009 WO
2009072100 Jun 2009 WO
2009072101 Jun 2009 WO
2009072102 Jun 2009 WO
2009072103 Jun 2009 WO
2009072104 Jun 2009 WO
2009072105 Jun 2009 WO
2009074978 Jun 2009 WO
2009074979 Jun 2009 WO
2009078006 Jun 2009 WO
2009095902 Aug 2009 WO
2011024015 Mar 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (75)
Entry
US 7,161,836, 01/2007, Wan et al. (withdrawn).
Agrell et al., “Closest Point Search in Lattices”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 48, No. 8, pp. 2201-2214, Aug. 2002.
Ankolekar et al., “Multibit Error-Correction Methods for Latency-Constrained Flash Memory Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 33-39, Mar. 2010.
Berman et al., “Mitigating Inter-Cell Coupling Effects in MLC NAND Flash via Constrained Coding”, Flash Memory Summit, Santa Clara, USA, Aug. 19, 2010.
Bez et al., “Introduction to Flash memory”, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 91, No. 4, pp. 489-502, Apr. 2003.
Blahut, R.E., “Theory and Practice of Error Control Codes,” Addison-Wesley, May 1984, section 3.2, pp. 47-48.
Chang, L., “Hybrid Solid State Disks: Combining Heterogeneous NAND Flash in Large SSDs”, ASPDAC, Jan. 2008.
Cho et al., “Multi-Level NAND Flash Memory with Non-Uniform Threshold Voltage Distribution,” IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference (ISSCC), San Francisco, CA, Feb. 5-7, 2001, pp. 28-29 and 424.
Compaq et al., “Universal Serial Bus Specification”, revision 2.0, Apr. 27, 2000.
Databahn™, “Flash memory controller IP”, Denali Software, Inc., 1994 https://www.denali.com/en/products/databahn—flash.jsp.
Datalight, Inc., “FlashFX Pro 3.1 High Performance Flash Manager for Rapid Development of Reliable Products”, Nov. 16, 2006.
Duann, N., Silicon Motion Presentation “SLC & MLC Hybrid”, Flash Memory Summit, Santa Clara, USA, Aug. 2008.
Eitan et al., “Can NROM, a 2-bit, Trapping Storage NVM Cell, Give a Real Challenge to Floating Gate Cells?”, Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials (SSDM), pp. 522-524, Tokyo, Japan 1999.
Eitan et al., “Multilevel Flash Cells and their Trade-Offs”, Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), pp. 169-172, New York, USA 1996.
Engh et al., “A self adaptive programming method with 5 mV accuracy for multi-level storage in FLASH”, pp. 115-118, Proceedings of the IEEE 2002 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, May 12-15, 2002.
Engineering Windows 7, “Support and Q&A for Solid-State Drives”, e7blog, May 5, 2009.
Goodman et al., “On-Chip ECC for Multi-Level Random Access Memories,” Proceedings of the IEEE/CAM Information Theory Workshop, Ithaca, USA, Jun. 25-29, 1989.
Gotou, H., “An Experimental Confirmation of Automatic Threshold Voltage Convergence in a Flash Memory Using Alternating Word-Line Voltage Pulses”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 18, No. 10, pp. 503-505, Oct. 1997.
Han et al., “An Intelligent Garbage Collection Algorithm for Flash Memory Storages”, Computational Science and Its Applications—ICCSA 2006, vol. 3980/2006, pp. 1019-1027, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Germany, May 11, 2006.
Han et al., “CATA: A Garbage Collection Scheme for Flash Memory File Systems”, Ubiquitous Intelligence and Computing, vol. 4159/2006, pp. 103-112, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg, Aug. 25, 2006.
Hong et al., “NAND Flash-based Disk Cache Using SLC/MLC Combined Flash Memory”, 2010 International Workshop on Storage Network Architecture and Parallel I/Os, pp. 21-30, USA, May 3, 2010.
Horstein, “On the Design of Signals for Sequential and Nonsequential Detection Systems with Feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory IT-12:4 (Oct. 1966), pp. 448-455.
How to Resolve Bad Super Block: Magic Number Wrong “in BSD”, Free Online Articles Director Article Base, posted Sep. 5, 2009.
Huffman, A., “Non-Volatile Memory Host Controller Interface (NVMHCI)”, Specification 1.0, Apr. 14, 2008.
JEDEC Standard JESD84-C44, “Embedded MultiMediaCard (eMMC) Mechanical Standard, with Optional Reset Signal”, Jedec Solid State Technology Association, USA, Jul. 2009.
JEDEC, “UFS Specification”, version 0.1, Nov. 11, 2009.
Jung et al., in “A 117 mm.sup.2 3.3V Only 128 Mb Multilevel NAND Flash Memory for Mass Storage Applications,” IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, (11:31), Nov. 1996, pp. 1575-1583.
Kang et al., “A Superblock-based Flash Translation Layer for NAND Flash Memory”, Proceedings of the 6th ACM & IEEE International Conference on Embedded Software, pp. 161-170, Seoul, Korea, Oct. 22-26, 2006.
Kawaguchi et al. 1995. A flash-memory based file system. In Proceedings of the USENIX 1995 Technical Conference , New Orleans, Louisiana. 155-164.
Kim et al., “Future Memory Technology including Emerging New Memories”, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Microelectronics (MIEL), vol. 1, pp. 377-384, Nis, Serbia and Montenegro, May 16-19, 2004.
Lee et al., “Effects of Floating Gate Interference on NAND Flash Memory Cell Operation”, IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 264-266, May 2002.
Maayan et al., “A 512 Mb NROM Flash Data Storage Memory with 8 MB/s Data Rate”, Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Solid-State circuits Conference (ISSCC 2002), pp. 100-101, San Francisco, USA, Feb. 3-7, 2002.
Mielke et al., “Recovery Effects in the Distributed Cycling of Flash Memories”, IEEE 44th Annual International Reliability Physics Symposium, pp. 29-35, San Jose, USA, Mar. 2006.
Micron Technology Inc., “Memory Management in NAND Flash Arrays”, Technical Note, year 2005.
Numonyx, “M25PE16: 16-Mbit, page-erasable serial flash memory with byte-alterability, 75 MHz SPI bus, standard pinout”, Apr. 2008.
Onfi, “Open NAND Flash Interface Specification,” revision 1.0, Dec. 28, 2006.
Panchbhai et al., “Improving Reliability of NAND Based Flash Memory Using Hybrid SLC/MLC Device”, Project Proposal for CSci 8980—Advanced Storage Systems, University of Minnesota, USA, Spring 2009.
Park et al., “Sub-Grouped Superblock Management for High-Performance Flash Storages”, IEICE Electronics Express, vol. 6, No. 6, pp. 297-303, Mar. 25, 2009.
Phison Electronics Corporation, “PS8000 Controller Specification (for SD Card)”, revision 1.2 Document No. S-07018, Mar. 28, 2007.
Shalvi, et al., “Signal Codes,” Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Information Theory Workshop (ITW'2003), Paris, France, Mar. 31-Apr. 4, 2003.
SD Group and SD Card Association, “SD Specifications Part 1 Physical Layer Specification”, version 3.01, draft 1.00, Nov. 9, 2009.
Serial ATA International Organization, “Serial ATA Revision 3.0 Specification”, Jun. 2, 2009.
Shiozaki, A., “Adaptive Type-II Hybrid Broadcast ARQ System”, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 44, Issue 4, pp. 420-422, Apr. 1996.
Suh et al., “A 3.3V 32Mb NAND Flash Memory with Incremental Step Pulse Programming Scheme”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 30, No. 11, pp. 1149-1156, Nov. 1995.
ST Microelectronics, “Bad Block Management in NAND Flash Memories”, Application note AN-1819, Geneva, Switzerland, May 2004.
ST Microelectronics, “Wear Leveling in Single Level Cell NAND Flash Memories,” Application note AN-1822 Geneva, Switzerland, Feb. 2007.
Super User Forums, “SD Card Failure, can't read superblock”, posted Aug. 8, 2010.
Takeuchi et al., “A Double Level VTH Select Gate Array Architecture for Multi-Level NAND Flash Memories”, Digest of Technical Papers, 1995 Symposium on VLSI Circuits, pp. 69-70, Jun. 8-10, 1995.
Takeuchi et al., “A Multipage Cell Architecture for High-Speed Programming Multilevel NAND Flash Memories”, IEEE Journal of Solid State Circuits, vol. 33, No. 8, Aug. 1998.
UBUNTU Forums, “Memory Stick Failed IO Superblock”, posted Nov. 11, 2009.
Wu et al., “eNVy: A non-Volatile, Main Memory Storage System”, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Architectural support for programming languages and operating systems, pp. 86-87, San Jose, USA, 1994.
International Application PCT/IL2007/000575 Search Report dated May 30, 2008.
International Application PCT/IL2007/000576 Search Report dated Jul. 7, 2008.
International Application PCT/IL2007/000579 Search report dated Jul. 3, 2008.
International Application PCT/IL2007/000580 Search Report dated Sep. 11, 2008.
International Application PCT/IL2007/000581 Search Report dated Aug. 25, 2008.
International Application PCT/IL2007/001059 Search report dated Aug. 7, 2008.
International Application PCT/IL2007/001315 search report dated Aug. 7, 2008.
International Application PCT/IL2007/001316 Search report dated Jul. 22, 2008.
International Application PCT/IL2007/001488 Search report dated Jun. 20, 2008.
International Application PCT/IL2008/000329 Search report dated Nov. 25, 2008.
International Application PCT/IL2008/000519 Search report dated Nov. 20, 2008.
International Application PCT/IL2008/001188 Search Report dated Jan. 28, 2009.
International Application PCT/IL2008/001356 Search Report dated Feb. 3, 2009.
International Application PCT/IL2008/001446 Search report dated Feb. 20, 2009.
Wei, L., “Trellis-Coded Modulation With Multidimensional Constellations”, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. IT-33, No. 4, pp. 483-501, Jul. 1987.
Conway et al., “Sphere Packings, Lattices and Groups”, 3rd edition, chapter 4, pp. 94-135, Springer, New York, USA 1998.
Chinese Patent Application # 200780040493.X Official Action dated Jun. 15, 2011.
Chinese Patent Application # 200780026181.3 Official Action dated Mar. 7, 2012.
Chinese Patent Application # 200780026094.8 Official Action dated Feb. 2, 2012.
Budilovsky et al., “Prototyping a High-Performance Low-Cost Solid-State Disk”, SYSTOR—The 4th Annual International Systems and Storage Conference, Haifa, Israel, May 30-Jun. 1, 2011.
NVM Express Protocol, “NVM Express”, Revision 1.0b, Jul. 12, 2011.
SCSI Protocol, “Information Technology—SCSI Architecture Model—5 (SAM-5)”, INCITS document T10/2104-D, revision 01, Jan. 28, 2009.
SAS Protocol, “Information Technology—Serial Attached SCSI—2 (SAS-2)”, INCITS document T10/1760-D, revision 15a, Feb. 22, 2009.
Kim et al., “Multi-bit Error Tolerant Caches Using Two-Dimensional Error Coding”, Proceedings of the 40th Annual ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO-40), Chicago, USA, Dec. 1-5, 2007.
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61369719 Aug 2010 US