The embodiments discussed herein are related to Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Profile stream decoding.
Extensible Markup Language (XML) is a markup language that defines a set of rules for encoding documents in a plain-text format that is both human-readable and machine-readable. One version of XML is defined in the XML 1.0 Specification produced by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and dated Nov. 26, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The XML 1.0 Specification defines an XML document as a text that is well-formed and valid.
An XML schema is a description of a type of XML document, typically expressed in terms of constraints on the structure and content of documents of that type, above and beyond the basic syntactical constraints imposed by the XML 1.0 Specification itself. These constraints are generally expressed using some combination of grammatical rules governing the order of elements, boolean predicates associated with the content, data types governing the content of elements and attributes, and more specialized rules such as uniqueness and referential integrity constraints. The process of checking to see if an XML document conforms to an XML schema is called validation, which is separate from XML's core concept of syntactic well-formedness. All XML documents are defined as being well-formed, but an XML document is on check for validity where the XML processor is “validating,” in which case the XML document is checked for conformance with its associated schema.
Although the plain-text human-readable aspect of XML documents may be beneficial in many situations, this human-readable aspect may also lead to XML documents that are large in size and therefore incompatible with devices with limited memory or storage capacity. Efforts to reduce the size of XML documents have therefore often eliminated this plain-text human-readable aspect in favor of more compact binary representations.
EXI is a Binary XML format in which XML documents are encoded in a binary data format rather than plain text. In general, using a binary XML format reduces the size and verbosity of XML documents, and may reduce the cost in terms of time and effort involved in parsing XML documents. EXI is formally defined in the EXI Format 1.0 Specification produced by the W3C and dated Mar. 10, 2011, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. An XML document may be encoded in an EXI format as a separate EXI stream.
When no schema information is available or when available schema information describes only portions of an EXI stream, EXI employs built-in element grammars. Built-in element grammars are dynamic and continuously evolve to reflect knowledge learned while processing an EXI stream. New built-in element grammars are created to describe the content of newly encountered elements and new grammar productions are added to refine existing built-in grammars. Newly learned grammars and productions are used to more efficiently represent subsequent elements in the EXI stream.
While useful for reflecting knowledge learned while processing an EXI stream, the dynamic and continuously evolving aspect of built-in element grammars may cause EXI streams to grow in dynamic memory to a point where the space allocated in dynamic memory for built-in element grammars is relatively large in size. This relatively large size may be problematic where an EXI stream is processed by an EXI processor that is employed in a device with limited memory capacity.
The subject matter claimed herein is not limited to embodiments that solve any disadvantages or that operate only in environments such as those described above. Rather, this background is only provided to illustrate one example technology area where some embodiments described herein may be practiced.
According to an aspect of an embodiment, a method of reducing dynamic memory usage during the decoding of an Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Profile stream may include parsing an EXI Profile stream to identify each element within the EXI Profile stream that is not defined by an associated XML schema. The method may also include examining the first bit after a corresponding SE event for each of the identified elements. The method may also include assigning an initial built-in element grammar with no top-level production to each element where the first bit is set to 0 or an augmented built-in element grammar with one top level production of AT(xsi:type) to each element where the first bit is set to 1.
The object and advantages of the embodiments will be realized and achieved at least by the elements, features, and combinations particularly pointed out in the claims.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory and are not restrictive of the invention, as claimed.
Example embodiments will be described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which:
Some embodiments described herein may include methods of reducing dynamic memory usage during the decoding of an Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Profile stream. As used herein, the phrase “EXI Profile stream” refers to a stream that conforms to the EXI Profile Specification produced by the W3C and dated Apr. 10, 2012, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. By eliminating certain dynamic and continuously evolving aspects of built-in element grammars, dynamic memory usage during the decoding of an EXI Profile stream may be reduced.
As used herein, the term “stream” refers to any electronic stream, document, or file. Therefore, as used herein, the phrase “EXI Profile stream” is synonymous with “EXI Profile document” or “EXI Profile file.” Similarly, the phrase “XML document” is synonymous with “XML stream” or “XML file.”
Embodiments of the present invention will be explained with reference to the accompanying drawings.
As illustrated in the chart 500 of
The method 600 may begin at block 602, in which an EXI Profile stream is parsed. For example, the EXI decoder 104 may parse through the EXI Profile stream 108.
In block 604, an element is identified within the EXI Profile stream. For example, the EXI decoder 104 may identify an element with QName “A” in the EXI Profile stream 108.
In decision block 606, it is determined whether the element is defined by an associated XML schema. For example, the EXI decoder 104 may determine whether the identified element with QName “A” is defined by an associated XML schema. If so (“Yes” at decision block 606), the method 600 proceeds to decision block 616, discussed below. If not (“No” at decision block 606), then the method 600 proceeds to block 608.
In block 608, the first bit after a corresponding SE event for the identified element is examined. For example, the EXI decoder 104 may examine the first bit after a corresponding SE event for the identified element with QName “A” in the EXI Profile stream 108.
In block 610, it is determined whether the first bit after a corresponding SE event for the identified element is set to “0” or “1.” For example, the EXI decoder 104 may determine whether the first bit after a corresponding SE event for the identified element with QName “A” in the EXI Profile stream EXI Profile stream 108 is set to “0” or “1”. If the first bit is set to “0” (“0” at decision block 610), then the method proceeds to block 612 where an initial built-in element grammar with no top-level production is assigned to the content of the element.
For example, where the identified element with QName “A” is the first root element 302 with QName “A” as represented on row 502 of the chart 500, the EXI decoder 104 may assign the initial built-in element grammar 200 with no top-level production to the content of the first root element 302. Conversely, if the first bit is a “1” (“1” at decision block 610), then the method proceeds to block 614 where an augmented built-in element grammar with one top level production of AT(xsi:type) is assigned to the content of the element. For example, where the identified element with QName “A” is the second nested element 304 with QName “A” as represented on row 506 of the chart 500, the EXI decoder 104 may assign the augmented built-in element grammar 250 with one top level production of AT(xsi:type) to the content of the second nested element 304.
At decision block 616, it is determined whether there are any remaining elements in the EXI Profile stream. For example, the EXI decoder 104 may determine whether there are any remaining elements in the EXI Profile stream 108. If so (“Yes” at decision block 616), the method 600 returns to block 606. If not (“No” at decision block 616), the method 600 completes.
Therefore, the embodiments disclosed herein include methods of reducing dynamic memory usage during the decoding of an EXI Profile stream. By determining which built-in grammar to assign by simply examining the bits following a corresponding SE event for each element of an EXI Profile stream, and thereby eliminating certain dynamic and continuously evolving aspects of built-in element grammars, dynamic memory usage during the decoding of the EXI Profile stream may be reduced. In particular, a built-in element grammar may not grow in dynamic memory each time an undefined element is encountered in the EXI Profile stream. Also, the amount of dynamic memory used for evolving built-in element grammars associated with each element may be capped. Further, no space may be allocated in dynamic memory for built-in element grammars. Finally, built-in element grammars may be assigned without examining or allocating any boolean flag in dynamic memory.
The embodiments described herein may include the use of a special purpose or general-purpose computer including various computer hardware or software modules, as discussed in greater detail below.
Embodiments described herein may be implemented using computer-readable media for carrying or having computer-executable instructions or data structures stored thereon. Such computer-readable media may be any available media that may be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer. By way of example, and not limitation, such computer-readable media may include non-transitory computer-readable storage media including RAM, ROM, EEPROM, CD-ROM or other optical disk storage, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other storage medium which may be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of computer-executable instructions or data structures and which may be accessed by a general purpose or special purpose computer. Combinations of the above may also be included within the scope of computer-readable media.
Computer-executable instructions comprise, for example, instructions and data which cause a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or special purpose processing device to perform a certain function or group of functions. Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
As used herein, the term “module” or “component” may refer to software objects or routines that execute on the computing system. The different components, modules, engines, and services described herein may be implemented as objects or processes that execute on the computing system (e.g., as separate threads). While the system and methods described herein are preferably implemented in software, implementations in hardware or a combination of software and hardware are also possible and contemplated. In this description, a “computing entity” may be any computing system as previously defined herein, or any module or combination of modulates running on a computing system.
All examples and conditional language recited herein are intended for pedagogical objects to aid the reader in understanding the invention and the concepts contributed by the inventor to furthering the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. Although embodiments of the present inventions have been described in detail, it should be understood that the various changes, substitutions, and alterations could be made hereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7801926 | Hunter et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7987420 | Kloba et al. | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8015483 | Vishwanath et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8191040 | Hejlsberg et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20030046317 | Cseri et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20060212799 | Kamiya | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20090183067 | Fablet | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090210783 | Bellessort | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090271695 | Ruellan et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287625 | Fablet et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100010995 | Fablet et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100083101 | Denoual et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100153837 | Bellessort et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100192056 | Bellessort et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100241949 | Ruellan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100287460 | Denoual et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110010614 | Fablet et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110153531 | Ishizaki | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110270895 | Shelby | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120124017 | Heuer et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120150828 | Fablet et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120254231 | Doi | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120254724 | Doi | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120254725 | Doi | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120330984 | Fablet et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130103721 | Doi et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130104033 | Doi et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110914 | Heuer et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140115104 | Heuer et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140297692 | Doi | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140337522 | Kuntschke et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
World Wide Web Consortium. Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth Edition), ed. Tim Bray et al. W3C Recommendation Nov. 26, 2008. http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/. |
World Wide Web Consortium. Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Format 1.0, ed. John Schneider et al. W3C Recommendation Mar. 10, 2011. http://www.w3.org/TR/exi/. |
World Wide Web Consortium. W3C XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 1: Structures, ed. Henry S. Thompson et al. W3C Recommendation Apr. 5, 2012. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-1/. |
World Wide Web Consortium. W3C XML Schema Definition Language (XSD) 1.1 Part 2: Datatypes, ed. David Peterson et al. W3C Recommendation Apr. 5, 2012. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/. |
World Wide Web Consortium. Efficient XML Interchange (EXI) Profile, ed. Youenn Fablet et al. W3C Working Draft. Apr. 10, 2012. http://www.w3.org/TR/exi-profile/. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140026030 A1 | Jan 2014 | US |