This application relates generally to photonics and, in particular, to photonic-based optical filtering.
Light-enabled technologies enable creation of faster, smaller, lower-powered components for interference-free device connectivity. These technologies replace conventional microelectronics with photonic processors that provide microphotonics-based real time signal processing to enable low interference high-bandwidth communications. Conventional photonic architectures include optical filter assemblies to facilitate interference cancellation. In particular, when implementing optical filters in a photonics integrated circuit (PIC), light is split into multiple paths and manipulated. These multiple paths of light are then combined to obtain a filter output.
However, conventional methods of combining light paths, are large, bulky, or lossy and may be difficult to incorporate into small form factor electronic devices.
An optical element comprises an array of waveguides fabricated on an optical integrated circuit. The array comprises individual waveguides, each of which receive light inputs, e.g., individual taps of a multi-tap optical filter used in an interference cancellation circuit. Each individual waveguide comprises an inlet that receives light, and an outlet. Typically, the output(s) of the individual waveguides are located at an exit (edge) of a photonic integrated circuit (PIC) and, in particular, along a common facet. In one embodiment, at least one second waveguide in the array is fabricated on the PIC in a tapered or “converging” configuration such that, relative to a first waveguide, the light transiting these waveguides co-propagates and interacts across given portions of the respective waveguides before exiting the waveguide array along the common facet, thereby generating or inhibiting one of: intermodulation products, and harmonics. In particular, this structural configuration enables the generation of various useful modes of transmission (e.g., supermode, and multi-mode) at the PIC exit, enabling more efficient transfer of the energy, e.g., to an associated photodetector (PD) that provides conversion of the energy to the RF domain.
The number of waveguides (taps) in the filter structure may vary, as can their shape(s) and relative spacing. In another aspect, the waveguides may be further separated by isolation elements to limit intermodulation products. Further, individual waveguides may include associated phase shifter elements at their leading ends (i.e. their inlets) for further signal-shaping.
The PIC-based optical element may be used in association with any RF component. In one embodiment as mentioned above, the optical filter is used in an interference cancellation circuit. Other applications of the optical element herein include, without limitation, an RF phased array antenna receiver, in an RF mixer, and the like.
The foregoing has outlined some of the more pertinent features of the subject matter. These features should be construed to be merely illustrative. Many other beneficial results can be attained by applying the disclosed subject matter in a different manner or by modifying the subject matter as will be described.
For a more complete understanding of the subject matter and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Transceiver circuit 102 includes a bus interface 107 and a communications interface 113. Bus interface 107 couples the transceiver circuit to bus 108. Communications interface 113 couples the transceiver circuit 102 to one or more or all of: an antenna assembly 101, a waveguide 115 and a wire/cable 117. In some embodiments, the antenna assembly is included as part of the communications device 100. Antenna assembly 101 includes one or more antennas (103, . . . 106). In some embodiments, antenna assembly 101 includes a single antenna 103 which is used by both the transmitter and receiver of the transceiver circuit 102. In some embodiments, that antenna assembly 101 includes a transmit antenna 103 and a receive antenna 106. In some embodiments, the antenna assembly includes a plurality of transmit antennas and a plurality of receive antennas. In some such embodiments, the antenna assembly 101 and the transceiver circuit 102 support multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) operations.
The transceiver circuit 102″ comprises of a transmit chain and the receive chain. In the transmit chain, the transmit digital baseband circuit 206 receives, via bus interface 107, input data 207 to be transmitted in the form of bits, converts the bits into a digital baseband waveform 205, which is output to the TX digital baseband to analog baseband circuit 204. The TX digital baseband circuit 206 performs encoding and modulation of the received input data 207. The encoding and modulation performed by TX digital baseband circuit 106 uses, e.g. orthogonal frequency division multiplexing, CDMA, or another encoding and modulation scheme. The TX digital baseband to analog baseband circuit 204, e.g., a filter and digital to analog converter (DAC) assembly, converts the digital signal 205 into analog baseband signal 203, which is output to TX analog baseband to RF circuit 202. Analog baseband signal 203 is received by TX analog baseband to RF circuit 202 and subsequently up-converted to the operating RF frequency using a direct conversion or an intermediate frequency converter included in circuit 202. The up-converted RF signal 201 is the output of a power amplifier included in circuit 202. The up-converted RF signal 201 is coupled or divided using a device 226 where the pass-through signal 227 goes to the communication interface 113″ and the tapped signal 223 is fed to the RF up-converter and interference cancellation filter circuit 222. The RF signal 227 in the communication interface 113″ passes through to the antenna 229 in case of this realization.
Receive antenna 231 receives a wireless RF signal and outputs received signal 233 into in to interface 113″ toward the receive chain. On the receive side of the transceiver circuit 102″, the receive signal 233 from the communication interface 113″ feeds in to a coupler or combiner 209 which is 3 port device. Coupler or combiner 209 is responsible for combining input signal 224, which is an output of the RF-up converter and interference cancellation filter circuit 222, and input signal 233, which is the signal received via receive antenna 213, to generate output RF signal 235. The output RF signal 235 is fed into the RX RF to analog baseband circuit, 210, which is an RF down-converter, that down-converts the RF signal 235 into a baseband analog signal 211. This baseband analog signal 211 is received, filtered and sampled by RX analog baseband to digital baseband circuit 212, which generates and outputs sampled output signal 213. The sampled output signal 213 is fed into the RX digital baseband circuit 214 including a digital receive processor that is responsible for demodulation and decoding.
RF Signal 223, a copy of the transmit signal 201, is fed into the RF up-converter and interference cancellation filter circuit 222. RF up-converter and interference cancellation filter circuit 222 produces signal 224, which is a negative copy or near negative copy of the interference signal received as a component of receive signal 233, the interference signal being an effect of transmission of signal 227. The combining of the negative copy 224 with the received signal 233 using a combiner/coupler device 209 results in cancellation of interference that is caused by the transmitter of transceiver circuit 102″ at the receiver of transceiver circuit 102″.
Channel estimator, filter and filter control circuit 216 interfaces with the digital processing block of transmit digital baseband circuit 206 and with the digital processing block of receive digital baseband circuit 214. The channel estimator, filter, and filter control circuit 216 is responsible for reconstruction of a residual interference signal that is observed at the sampled signal 220 in the RX digital baseband circuit 214. In particular, the channel estimator, filter and filter control circuit 216 is responsible for the measurement and training of a digital filter included in circuit 216 and the RF cancellation filter included in circuit 222. To this end, channel estimator, filter, and filter control circuit 216 uses input signal 219, a copy of the digital transmit signal, and received sampled signal 220 to determine the effect of the transceiver circuit 102″ and antennas (229, 231), determine the channel that causes interference, and determine the appropriate coefficients to be programmed to the RF interference cancellation filter included in circuit 222. The determined appropriate coefficients are communicated in signal 217 from channel estimator, filter and filter control circuit 216 to RF up-converter and interference cancellation filter circuit 222. Channel estimator, filter and filter control circuit 216 also recreates a negative copy 221 of the interference signal, which it sends to RX digital baseband circuit 214 to be subtracted from the received signal 213. RX digital baseband circuit 214 receives the recreated negative copy 221 of the interference signal and subtracts the recreated negative copy 221 of the interference signal from received signal 213, as part of its processing. Circuit 214 further generates digital data out signal 215 and outputs digital data out signal via interface 107.
Optical filter assembly 306 typically includes an optical IIR filter assembly (not shown), an optical FIR filter assembly 313, a filter controller (not shown), a 1 to 2 optical coupler 310, two (2) 1 to N optical couplers (312, 314) and two (2) N to 1 optical couplers (340, 342) coupled together as shown in
Laser 302 generates and outputs optical signal 326, which is sent to RF to optical converter 304, which receives that optical signal. The RF-to-optical converter also 304 receives an input RF signal on radio frequency input 399 and generates output optical signal 328, which is output on optical output 397. The optical signal is provided as an input to the optical filter assembly 306. This optical signal is processed by the optical IIR filter assembly, which generates and outputs an optical signal. The optical IIR filter assembly subjects the input optical signal to delays in accordance with the fixed delays corresponding to the FRRs, and to gain adjustments in accordance with the controlled gain adjustments in accordance with the controlled gain settings of gain control elements, thereby generating an optical output signal. The optical signal output from the optical IIR filter assembly is input to the coupler 310, e.g., a 1 to 2 splitter, which generates first and second optical signals. The first optical signal is input to the 1×N coupler (splitter) 312, which outputs optical signals to the input(s) of controllable delay devices (D11, D21, . . . DN1), respectively. The second optical signal is input to the 1×N coupler (splitter) 314, which outputs optical signals to the input(s) of controllable delay devices (D12, D22, . . . , DN2), respectively. The optical delay devices introduce variable delays corresponding to the controlled delay settings supplied by the filter controller, generating optical signals that are then supplied as inputs(s) to controllable gain elements (AF11, AF21, . . . , AFN1, AF12, AF22, . . . , AFN2), respectively. The controllable gain elements adjust gains corresponding to the controlled gains settings based on the filter control signals supplied by the filter controller, thereby generating resulting optical signals. Some of these optical signals are input to N×1 optical coupler (combiner) 340, which combines the signals and outputs an optical signal. The remaining optical signals are input to N×1 optical coupler (combiner) 342, which combines the signals and outputs another optical signal. These optical signals output from the optical filter assembly 306 couple the optical filter assembly 306 to the optical-to-RF converter 304, in this embodiment the balanced photodetector. Optical-to-RF converter 306 receives the optical signals and generates and outputs an RF signal.
Thus, in the embodiment shown in
In practice, however, both the 1×N coupler and the N×1 coupler can be challenging to physically realize. To see why this is so, reference is now made to
One possible approach to address this problem is depicted in
Optical circuits having waveguide arrays can provide different modes of light transmission. These include single mode, multi-mode and super-mode. In single mode, an individual waveguide supports just one mode of propagation. In multi-mode, an individual waveguide supports more than one mode of propagation. Super-mode refers to a guided mode that exists between multiple discrete waveguides that are configured in single or multi-mode.
According to the approach herein, and in lieu of taking waveguide outputs off a PIC for conversion to RF and combining in the RF domain (
In this example embodiment, the waveguide array comprises two (2) sets of waveguides depicted as being formed on (etched into) the substrate 700 (which may be formed by leveraging conventional patterning techniques), with a first set 702 corresponding to the outputs of the N×1 combiner (e.g., coupler 340 in
Thus, according to this disclosure, at least a first waveguide in a set of waveguides is patterned on the optical circuit at least in part in a converging configuration such that, relative to at least one second waveguide in the set, the resulting outlets of the first and second waveguides are spaced in a manner to facilitate the generation or inhibition (from the array) of intermodulation products and/or harmonics. Preferably, the first and second waveguides are configured relative to one another such that light entering both waveguides (even at the same polarization) propagates through portions of the waveguides that are positioned sufficiently adjacent to one another (and that then typically terminate along a same PIC facet); this type of propagation (across nearby portions of the waveguides) is sometimes referred to herein as co-propagation and can excite a supermode between the waveguides. In a typical case, co-propagation occurs over a length or extent of the adjacent waveguide portions, and the amount of such co-propagation (e.g., corresponding to the common length portions) then determines a degree to which intermodulation products and/or ‘are created or limited. The adjacent waveguide portions are sometimes referred to herein as a co-propagation region.
As a concrete example,
As these examples evidence, the amount and nature of the intermodulation products can thus be selectively tuned by adjusting the structural arrangement of the converged waveguide(s) that, typically, terminate at the same PIC facet. Stated another way, and given first and second waveguides (with one converging toward the other at least in part), the light enters both waveguide inlets, and it transits the waveguides. Due to the converging structure, the light also co-propagates along the portions of the first and second waveguides that lead to the terminus, thereby creating/inhibiting intermodulation products and/or harmonics as a function of the co-propagation (typically, length); the light, having now passed through both waveguides, then terminates from the array at the common facet. The nature and extent of the intermodulation products or harmonics produced by the waveguides thus are tunable by controlling the co-propagation length. In an alternative, co-propagation may be impacted by other structural arrangements or relationships of the waveguide portions (e.g., orientation, size, shape, input phase of the optical signal input to the respective guides, etc.)
In addition, the properties of the co-propagation region and thus the intermodulation products or harmonics generated or inhibited may change due to environmental factors, such as temperature, pressure, stress, vibration and the presence of gasses or other substances. In one example scenario, one or more of the following factors thus may be engineered to generate a desired output from the FICO device: length of co-propagation, phase of one or more individual waveguides, intensity of one or more of the individual waveguides, temperature of the system or device (which in effect alters co-propagation length), properties of the waveguides and separation material (which may be altered during fabrication using temperature or temperature gradients). More generally, if the impact of such factors are known or ascertainable (and controllable), it is within the scope of this disclosure to tune the co-propagation region further to take advantage of one or more such factors.
The above-described structural arrangement (e.g., the co-propagation region) facilitates the focused integration of the waveguide outputs, hence the FICO name. As a skilled person will appreciate, the generation or inhibition of intermodulation products and/or harmonics, as the case may be, each represent different forms of distortion of the modulated signal produced by the FICO structure.
In the example embodiment in
Although
The above-described structural arrangement provides significant advantages. In particular, the approach allows all of the energy from the individual waveguides to be transferred to the PD, which energy is then converted to the RF domain for further processing (in this embodiment). In particular, and by sizing the aperture close to that of the PD, constructive and destructive fringes are captured and converted, thereby avoiding optical power (interference-related) losses.
Although the waveguide array is depicted in
Referring now to
Generalizing, the FICO apparatus of this disclosure comprises an array of waveguides patterned onto a PIC. The array comprises individual waveguides, each of which receive light inputs, e.g., individual taps of a multi-tap optical filter used in an interference cancellation circuit. Each individual waveguide comprises an inlet, and an outlet; typically, the output(s) of the individual waveguides are located at an exit (edge) of the PIC. Typically, the waveguide array as structured is configured along an axis passing through a first waveguide. According to this disclosure, at least one second waveguide in the array is patterned on the PIC in a tapered configuration such that, relative to the first waveguide, the outlet(s) of the first and second waveguides are positioned to be closer to one another as compared to the inlet(s) of these waveguides. This structural configuration enables the generation of the super-mode of transmission at the PIC exit, enabling more efficient transfer of the energy, e.g., to an associated PD that provides conversion of the energy to the RF domain.
Further, it is not required that the individual waveguides in the waveguide array set have the same physical structure (namely, width, length, etc.). Referring now to
Generalizing, the number of waveguides (taps) in the FICO structure may vary, as can their shape(s) and relative spacing. Where desirable, and as also described, waveguides may be further separated by isolation elements to limit intermodulation products. Further, individual waveguides may include associated phase shifter elements at their leading ends (i.e. their inlets) for further signal-shaping.
In accordance with another variant embodiment, a phase shifter is associated with one or more of the individual waveguides that are patterned on the PIC. The phase shifter(s) preferably are located at a front end of the waveguide array (the FICO structure), which in
While the FICO structure provides significant advantages when used as an optical filter in association with a photodetector as previously described, this is not a limitation. The following describes various use cases that benefit from this subject matter.
In one example, the output provided by the converged waveguides in the FICO structure are coupled as an input to another photonic chip in lieu of being converted to the RF domain for further processing. In this arrangement, the photodetector is not used.
In another example, the FICO structure facilitates creation of a phased array optical interface, allowing beam steering and efficient coupling to diverse targets.
In still another variant, depicted in
In a phased array antenna of this type, it is important to accurately adjust the phase/delay of multiple received signals from multiple antennas to reconstruct a given spatial beam. Using a PIC, high-fidelity switched, true time delay lines are implemented, and these variable delays are used to accurately reconstruct a given spatial beam. The FICO structure facilitates recombining the signals to recover the spatial beam, as well as to facilitate efficient coupling to the photodetector efficient optical-to-electrical conversion.
Enabling Technologies
The FICO apparatus of this disclosure is configured to be fabricated on a photonic integrated circuit. Generalizing, a PIC (or, more generally, an integrated optical circuit) is a device that integrates a plurality of photonic functions, typically functions for information signals imposed on optical wavelengths typically in the visible spectrum or near infrared 850 nm-1650 nm. Several of these functions have been described herein by way of example, but these examples are not intended to be limiting. Photonic integrated circuits are fabricated from a variety of material systems, including electro-optic crystals such as lithium niobate, silica on silicon, Silicon on insulator, as well as various polymers and semiconductor materials. According to this disclosure, a photonic integrated circuit is configured to include at least one FICO apparatus configured as has been described and depicted.
The description above concerning a waveguide “inlet” or “outlet” is not intended to be limiting. Depending on the use case, a particular inlet of a waveguide may function as an outlet, or vice versa.
This application is a continuation of, and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/511,715, filed Jul. 15, 2019, and titled “Efficiently Combining Multiple Taps of an Optical Filter,” the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4608569 | Dickey, Jr. et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
5377289 | Johnson | Dec 1994 | A |
5444864 | Smith | Aug 1995 | A |
5699176 | Cohen | Dec 1997 | A |
5701371 | Ishida | Dec 1997 | A |
RE35736 | Powell | Feb 1998 | E |
5757312 | Szmurlo | May 1998 | A |
5867293 | Kotten | Feb 1999 | A |
5904546 | Wood et al. | May 1999 | A |
6359714 | Imajo | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6373909 | Lindquist | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6507728 | Watanabe | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6539204 | Marsh | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6567648 | Ahn | May 2003 | B1 |
6567649 | Souissi | May 2003 | B2 |
6745018 | Zehavi | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6751447 | Jin | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760454 | Shreve | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6771931 | Waltho | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6907093 | Blount | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7058368 | Nicholls | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7064697 | Taylor et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7085497 | Tiemann | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7116484 | Nemoto | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123676 | Gebara | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130289 | Kuan et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7355993 | Adkins | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366244 | Gebara | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7509054 | Calabro et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7566634 | Beyne et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7650080 | Yap | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7660531 | Lee | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672643 | Loh | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7711329 | Aparin | May 2010 | B2 |
7720029 | Orava | May 2010 | B2 |
7729431 | Gebara | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7756480 | Loh | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7809047 | Kummetz | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7826808 | Faulkner | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7853195 | Higgins | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7869527 | Vetter | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7876867 | Filipovic | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7907895 | Shinagawa | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917177 | Bauman | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8036606 | Kenington | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8055235 | Gupta et al. | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8078130 | Fudge | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8081946 | Fudge | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8155605 | Hwang | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8170487 | Sahota et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8233872 | Nagai | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8249540 | Gupta | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8270843 | Nakamoto | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8320504 | Peng | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8331509 | Wang | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8351874 | Dent | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8477871 | Neumann | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8521090 | Kim | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8526903 | Gudem | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8565681 | Kim | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8600200 | Rakich et al. | Dec 2013 | B1 |
8682170 | Prucnal | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8730786 | Wang | May 2014 | B2 |
8781030 | Peng | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8785332 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8805298 | McCallister | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8845854 | Lei et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8872583 | Lee | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8971712 | Fan et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8977223 | Gupta | Mar 2015 | B1 |
9100099 | Loh | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9106453 | Wang | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9178635 | Ben-Shlomo | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9184902 | Khojastepour | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9195052 | Long | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9214718 | Mow | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9224650 | Lei et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9252857 | Negus | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9253003 | Harel | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9257811 | Gao | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9258052 | George | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9268092 | Jarecki, Jr | Feb 2016 | B1 |
9344125 | Kpodzo | May 2016 | B2 |
9344139 | Sjoland | May 2016 | B2 |
9385268 | Minamiru et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9391667 | Sundstrom | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9438288 | Feld | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9450623 | Weissman | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9490963 | Choi | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9520985 | Choi | Dec 2016 | B2 |
9571205 | Suarez | Feb 2017 | B1 |
9589812 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9602149 | Tanzi | Mar 2017 | B1 |
9608718 | Monsen | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9651652 | Kpodzo et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9667404 | Sjoland | May 2017 | B2 |
9696492 | Cox | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9703056 | Neelakantan et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9712233 | Deng | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9722713 | Tanzi | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9723612 | Stapleton | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9726821 | Murray et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9735056 | Takahashi et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9748906 | Stewart | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9768852 | Ling | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9774364 | Shih | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9775123 | Harel | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9793943 | Sjoland | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9793992 | Hino | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9807700 | Harel | Oct 2017 | B2 |
9847258 | Rohleder et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
9871552 | Din | Jan 2018 | B2 |
9885806 | Steinhardt | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9900044 | Sjoland | Feb 2018 | B2 |
9923593 | Andersson | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9923708 | Khandani | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9960805 | Wyville | May 2018 | B2 |
9960850 | Daniel | May 2018 | B2 |
9997363 | Ono et al. | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10009120 | Ranson | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10027465 | Sjoland | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10031246 | Zhou | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10038471 | Chang | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10084506 | Sjoland | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10110306 | Jain et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10177836 | Hong | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10191217 | Boutami | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10257746 | Jain et al. | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10321357 | Jain et al. | Jun 2019 | B1 |
10325861 | Miccoli | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10356782 | Negus | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10367584 | Rakich | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10418775 | Gao | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10491313 | Jain | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10663663 | Painchaud | May 2020 | B2 |
10673519 | Hong | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10727945 | Nguyen et al. | Jul 2020 | B1 |
10754091 | Nagarajan | Aug 2020 | B1 |
10873877 | Jain et al. | Dec 2020 | B2 |
11032005 | Vishwanath et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11032737 | Jain et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
20020105997 | Zhang | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030048524 | Chavez-Pirson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030161637 | Yamamoto | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030202794 | Izadpanah | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040151238 | Masenten | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040247221 | Tsarev | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264610 | Marro | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050285541 | LeChevalier | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20080013881 | Welch | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080112053 | Levner et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20110065408 | Kenington et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110065409 | Kenington | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110115040 | Su | May 2011 | A1 |
20110280582 | Piehler et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120212360 | Kanter et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120251041 | Ishikawa et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130295980 | Reuven | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140169236 | Choi | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150358086 | Foster et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160103341 | Long | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20170141853 | Welch et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170176780 | Levy | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170250758 | Kikuchi et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170299806 | Kopp et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180006795 | Raaf | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180219633 | Kanter | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180248627 | Daniel | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190086620 | Chen | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20200209476 | Mattis et al. | Jul 2020 | A1 |
20210088724 | Liu et al. | Mar 2021 | A1 |
20210126669 | Roberts et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210153073 | Hain et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20210297156 | Jain et al. | Sep 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101379718 | Mar 2009 | CN |
104484852 | Apr 2015 | CN |
3561561 | Oct 2019 | EP |
2139374 | Nov 1984 | GB |
2002214461 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2006301415 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2474056 | Jan 2013 | RU |
WO 06072086 | Jul 2006 | WO |
WO 07092767 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 08036356 | Mar 2008 | WO |
WO 12112357 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO 16118079 | Jul 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 7, 2020, PCT/US2020/041263, 17 pages. |
Chang et al., “Full-duplex spectrum sensing in cognitive radios using optical self-interference cancellation,” 2015 9th International Conference on Sensing Technology (ICST), IEEE, pp. 341-344, Dec. 8, 2015. |
Velha et al., “Simultaneous data transmissions on engineered closely packed silicon-on-insulator waveguide arrays,” 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), IEEE, pp. 1-4, Jul. 2, 2017. |
Tang et al., “System limitations due to channel cross-coupling in a highly parallel polymer-based single-mode channel waveguide array,” Advances in Resistive Technology and Processing XVI, vol. 2042, 12 pages, Aug. 16, 1993. |
Mothe et al., “Multichannel Microwave Photonics Signals Summation Device,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 140-142, Feb. 1, 2011. |
Tartaret-Josni'ere et al., “Microwave Photonics Summation Device With up to 19 Input Signals in K and Ku Bands,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 34, No. 20, pp. 4715-4721, Oct. 15, 2016. |
Author Unknown, “Silicon Nanophotonic Packaging,” IBM, https://researcher.watson.IBM.com/researcher/view_ group_subpage.php?id+5522, Jul. 2016. |
Li et al., “Multimode silicon photonics,” Nanophotonics, vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 227-247, May 16, 2019. |
Yoo et al., “Heterogeneous 2D/3D photonic integrated microsystems,” Microsystems & Nanoengineering, (2016) 2, 16030, Aug. 2016. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210036779 A1 | Feb 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16511715 | Jul 2019 | US |
Child | 16931312 | US |