The present invention relates to internal combustion engines, and particularly to exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) systems in engines. More particularly, the invention relates to more effective recirculation of exhaust gases.
Spark ignition engines often use catalytic converters and oxygen sensors to help control engine emissions. A gas pedal is typically connected to a throttle that meters air into engine. That is, stepping on the pedal directly opens the throttle to allow more air into the engine. Oxygen sensors are often used to measure the oxygen level of the engine exhaust, and provide feed back to a fuel injector control to maintain the desired air/fuel ratio (AFR), typically close to a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio to achieve stoichiometric combustion. Stoichiometric combustion can allow three-way catalysts to simultaneously remove hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) in attempt to meet emission requirements for the spark ignition engines.
Compression ignition engines (e.g., diesel engines) have been steadily growing in popularity. Once reserved for the commercial vehicle markets, diesel engines are now making real headway into the car and light truck markets. Partly because of this, federal regulations were passed requiring decreased emissions in diesel engines.
Many diesel engines now employ turbochargers for increased efficiency. In such systems, and unlike most spark ignition engines, the pedal is not directly connected to a throttle that meters air into engine. Instead, a pedal position is used to control the fuel rate provided to the engine by adjusting a fuel “rack”, which allows more or less fuel per fuel pump shot. The air to the engine is typically controlled by the turbocharger, often a variable nozzle turbocharger (VNT) or waste-gate turbocharger.
Traditional diesel engines can suffer from a mismatch between the air and fuel that is provided to the engine, particularly since there is often a time delay between when the operator moves the pedal, i.e., injecting more fuel, and when the turbocharger spins-up to provide the additional air required to produced the desired air-fuel ratio. To shorten this “turbo-lag”, a throttle position sensor is often added and fed back to the turbocharger controller to increase the natural turbo acceleration, and consequently the air flow to the engine.
The pedal position is often used as an input to a static map, which is used in the fuel injector control loop. Stepping on the pedal increases the fuel flow in a manner dictated by the static map. In some cases, the diesel engine contains an air-fuel ratio (AFR) estimator, which is based on input parameters such as fuel injector flow and intake manifold air flow, to estimate when the AFR is low enough to expect smoke to appear in the exhaust, at which point the fuel flow is reduced. The airflow is often managed by the turbocharger, which provides an intake manifold pressure and an intake manifold flow rate for each driving condition.
In diesel engines, there are typically no sensors in the exhaust stream analogous to that found in spark ignition engines. Thus, control over the combustion is often performed in an “open-loop” manner, which often relies on engine maps to generate set points for the intake manifold parameters that are favorable for acceptable exhaust emissions. As such, engine air-side control is often an important part of overall engine performance and in meeting exhaust emission requirements. In many cases, control of the turbocharger and EGR systems are the primary components in controlling the emission levels of a diesel engine.
Most diesel engines do not have emissions component sensors. One reason for the lack of emissions component sensors in diesel engines is that combustion is about twice as lean as spark ignition engines. As such, the oxygen level in the exhaust is often at a level where standard emission sensors do not provide useful information. At the same time, diesel engines may burn too lean for conventional three-way catalysts.
After-treatment is often required to help clean up diesel engine exhaust. After-treatment often includes a “flow through oxidation” catalyst. Typically, such systems do not have any controls. Hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and most significantly those hydrocarbons that are adsorbed on particulates can sometimes be cleaned up when the conditions are right. Other after-treatment systems include particulate filters. However, these filters must often be periodically cleaned, often by injecting a slug of catalytic material with the fuel. The control of this type of after-treatment may be based on a pressure sensor or on distance traveled, often in an open loop manner.
Practical NOx reduction approaches presently pose a technology challenge. Catalytic converters and particulate traps often require regeneration. Further, air flows, species of concentrations, temperatures, and exhaust gas recirculation should be managed in a manner to control engine emission levels.
The invention pertains to EGR control so as to lower pollutants in engine exhaust emissions such as NOx and still maintain good power output and efficiency. On some engines, such as diesel engines with turbochargers, an issue arises with the recirculation of exhaust gases from the exhaust system back into the intake system. It is that the pressure of the intake may be greater than the pressure in the exhaust and exhaust gases cannot be recirculated. However, there may be fluctuations of the pressure difference between the intake and the exhaust at some moments where the exhaust pressure is greater that the intake pressure. The present invention may incorporate an EGR valve that captures favorable pressure differences to achieve effective gas recirculation.
In the present description, please note that much of the material may be of a hypothetical or prophetic nature even though stated in apparent matter-of-fact language.
The power of the engine 11 may be increased by compressing the mixture 36, along with the fuel, before it enters the cylinder 17, with a mechanism such as the turbocharger 13. The exhaust gases 14 exiting the engine 11 into manifold 23 may go to a turbine 27 via an exhaust pipe 28. The exhaust gases 14 may turn or spin turbine 27 at a relatively high number of revolutions per minute (rpm). After the exhaust gases 14 pass turbine 27, they may exit the turbo charger via an exhaust pipe 32. Turbine 27 in turn may turn a compressor turbine 29 via a shaft 31. Turbine 29 may draw in fresh air 16 via an intake tube 33 and output into a tube 34 that is connected to the manifold 15. Since the movement of air 16 into tube 34 is much faster than the normal intake of a naturally aspirated engine 11, the air 16 may become compressed as it enters the engine via the manifold 15. If the pressure of compressed air 16 is higher than the pressure of the exhaust gas 14 in pipe 28, then exhaust gas might not go through an open valve 12 and mix with air 16 in tube 34 or manifold 15 to result in an EGR. It is this differential pressure which is of concern here.
EGR may be accomplished by means of a pipe 35, or other device for conveyance, which may connect the exhaust manifold 23 or exhaust pipe 28 to the intake manifold or air intake tube 34. In the EGR flow pipe 35, an on/off valve, a proportional flow valve or a reed valve may be situated in the pipe as the valve 12. When the on/off valve or the proportional flow valve is used, either one may be controlled at a conventional, slow time scale to modulate EGR as a function of load and speed of the crankshaft 24 of engine 11. In both these cases, the exhaust pressure should be greater than the intake pressure to provide an EGR flow in the right direction. The intake pressure and the exhaust pressure may be measured by pressure sensors 37 and 38, respectively. Sensors 37 and 38 may be connected to a controller 40. Signals from the sensors 37 and 38 may be utilized to determine the differential pressure across the flow control mechanism 12. This pressure may also be detected by a differential or delta pressure sensor appropriately situated. The speed or revolution rate or count of the crankshaft may be detected by a speed sensor 39 that is proximate to a flywheel 51 which is attached to crankshaft 24. Sensor 39 may be connected to controller 40. The valve or mechanism 12 may be connected to controller 40 via connection 53. Controller 40 may utilize mathematical models and appropriate control logic, look-up tables, or other schemes, in computing control signals from engine-related parameters for the flow control mechanism 12.
When the reed valve is used, the EGR flow may be dependent on the characteristics of such valve which are not actively controlled. In a well designed highly turbocharged engine 11, such as a diesel engine, the turbocharger 13 may create an intake boost which is higher than the engine exhaust manifold pressure. Thus, in order to induce a flow of exhaust gas 14 from the exhaust manifold 23 or pipe 28 to the intake tube 34 or manifold 15, the time averaged exhaust manifold 23 pressure must be raised above the intake manifold 15 pressure. This may be a problem, because in essence, the intake pressure being higher than the exhaust pressure may negate the positive pumping contribution of the turbocharger 13 and result in a loss of efficiency and fuel economy by the engine. Furthermore, since the exhaust pressure may be pulsing, due to individual cylinder events, pulses from the exhaust may be transmitted to the intake manifold 15. Some of the exhaust gas 14 flow accomplished during pressure pulses may be reversed when the exhaust manifold 23 pressure falls and the intake manifold 15 pressure is momentarily higher then the exhaust. To obtain a net result that is to accomplish the desired EGR rate, the engine may be “back-pressured” by, for example, obstructing the exhaust gas 14 flow in pipe 28, which may result in a fuel economy loss of the engine. Furthermore, as higher levels of EGR are required, the fuel economy penalty increases, and in some cases the engine will not be able to achieve the required EGR levels due to limitations in the turbocharger 13 and engine 11 thermodynamics.
The present device or valve 12 may solve the problem of inducing flow of EGR without increasing back pressure. This may be accomplished by first recognizing that the exhaust gas 14 pressure has pulses, and that the magnitude of these pressure pulses are such that they exceed the intake mixture 36 pressure for certain periods of time. These pressure pulses may be detected by sensor 38. By closing the EGR path in tube or pipe 35 during unfavorable or negative pressure gradients, the present flow control mechanism or valve 12 may prevent reverse EGR flow; however, it then may re-open the path during positive or forward pressure with minimum flow restriction. The benefit is that the engine back-pressure requirement to induce the desired EGR flow may be lowered or eliminated. Thus, EGR may be able to flow “up-hill”, i.e., in the appropriate direction from the exhaust manifold 23 or pipe 28 to the intake manifold 15 or tube 34 via tube 35, even where the time averaged intake manifold pressure is higher than the time averaged exhaust manifold pressure. The flow or flow rate of the fluid (e.g., gas 14) may be detected and measured with a flow sensor which may be connected to controller 40 via line 53. The flow sensor may be situated in tube 35 proximate to the flow control mechanism 12 or within the mechanism 12.
To accomplish this phenomenon, the present device or valve 12 may have a controllable open “window” area such that the flow area, time of opening and time of closing can be controlled to coincide with the favorable pressure pulses, thus opening only when forward flow will occur and only for a duration compatible with desired EGR flow rate. The valve may very rapidly control a flow of a fluid (i.e., a gas or liquid) with the opening and closing of the window with a moveable mechanical obstruction.
Additional configurations of present device 12 may include one window, which operates at N times engine speed, where N is the number cylinders 17 of the engine 11. The window may have a time period when it is open relative to a time it is closed during each cycle of operation. The cycle of operation may a fraction of the engine speed or greater. It may be a pulsating window which may have a period when it is variably partially open. Other configurations of device 12 may provide a variable open flow area “window” that does not have operational cycles or is not pulsing.
Another configuration of device 12 may include a “piston valve” which is configured like the intake ports on a two-stroke engine which has a piston moving such that it opens the port area and provides the flow area “window” for EGR 14 in pipe 35. Such valve may have various modes or styles of operation.
The present system 10 may also include a mechanism for closing or restricting the flow of gas 14 to the main turbine 27, which may be either a VNT (variable nozzle turbine) in the turbocharger 13. There may be a main flow restriction mechanism or valve as in one of the exhaust pipes 28 and 32 or the exhaust manifold 23. Controller 40 may coordinate the restriction of the main turbine flow as required to enhance EGR flow.
The device or valve 12 may have a fast acting mechanism which controls the time of window opening and time of window closing. It may be sufficiently rapid so that each exhaust pulse can have a different open and closing time with valve 12. In
Another EGR control scheme may be to sense the exhaust pressure pulse and adjust the open area profile of window 45 according to the strength of the exhaust pulse. This may provide a control of EGR 14 flow that is as fast as each cylinder's exhaust pulse. This may permit equalization of EGR 14 going to each cylinder 17, or adjustment of the EGR 14 level for each cylinder, as desired, to provide stipulated amounts of exhaust gas to specific cylinders.
The total EGR flow area may be large enough that significant flow can occur in a very short time and then in many cases, the open window period may be less than the total pulse width. Valve 12 may be sufficiently fast to effect a very quick EGR action. Controller 40 may provide or maintain a certain open window area to best utilize the pressure difference pulse. The open window area for the flow control mechanism 12 may be of another valve-type mechanism besides the rotating disks 43 and 44.
An increase in engine back-pressure may be accomplished by closing-off (or reducing), momentarily, the exhaust flow to the turbine with a use of a multiple flow-path EGR valve configuration which coordinates the opening and closing of the flow-path (possibly with another controllable valve-type mechanism) to the turbine 27 and/or the EGR valve 12. These events may be phased or timed with the EGR valve 12 openings such that higher-pressure pulses and thus an EGR flow are obtained as needed.
The valve 12 areas of opening and timing may be controlled on a cylinder by cylinder basis to accomplish a customized EGR flow for each exhaust pulse and to nominally equalize the EGR flow with respect to each pulse. Each cylinder may have an individual pressure sensor (not shown) connected to controller 40 via a connection line 52. This may be particularly useful if there is considerable cycle to cycle variation in the strength of the exhaust pulse which results in cycle to cycle and cylinder to cylinder variation in the exhaust gas recirculation rate. That could mean that if the cylinders are providing different amounts of power, recirculated gas may be provided in adjusted and different amounts in a timely fashion to each of the cylinders so as to result in the same amounts of power from each of the cylinders. This evenness of power from the cylinders may result in a very smooth running and efficient engine.
Since emissions from a given cylinder event may be particularly sensitive to an EGR rate, control of EGR rate as a function of exhaust pressure pulse strength may be particularly beneficial in terms of emissions, economy and power. This control strategy may be strengthened by the use of various other kinds of sensors which may be used to measure shock, vibration, pulses, temperatures, mixtures, and other parameters of the engine system. The signals from these sensors may be input to the processor or controller to provide appropriate signals to the flow control mechanism 12 for effective EGR. EGR flow control may be based on the use of pressure sensors and/or other related sensors together with mathematical models and appropriate control logic. Controller 40 may incorporate the mathematical models and the control logic for EGR flow control based on parameter signals from pressure sensors and/or the other related sensors as noted above.
Although the invention has been described with respect to at least one illustrative embodiment, many variations and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the present specification. It is therefore the intention that the appended claims be interpreted as broadly as possible in view of the prior art to include all such variations and modifications.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3744461 | Davis | Jul 1973 | A |
4005578 | McInerney | Feb 1977 | A |
4055158 | Marsee | Oct 1977 | A |
4252098 | Tomczak et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4383441 | Willis et al. | May 1983 | A |
4426982 | Lehner et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4438497 | Willis et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4456883 | Bullis et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4485794 | Kimberley et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
4554943 | Claney et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4601270 | Kimberley et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4653449 | Kamei et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
5044337 | Williams | Sep 1991 | A |
5076237 | Hartman et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5089236 | Clerc | Feb 1992 | A |
5108716 | Nishizawa | Apr 1992 | A |
5123397 | Richeson | Jun 1992 | A |
5233829 | Komatsu | Aug 1993 | A |
5282449 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5349816 | Sanbayashi et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5365734 | Takeshima | Nov 1994 | A |
5398502 | Watanabe | Mar 1995 | A |
5452576 | Hamburg et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5477840 | Neumann | Dec 1995 | A |
5560208 | Halimi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570574 | Yamashita et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5609139 | Ueda et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5611198 | Lane et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5690086 | Kawano et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692478 | Nogi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5746183 | Parke et al. | May 1998 | A |
5765533 | Nakajima | Jun 1998 | A |
5771867 | Amstutz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5785030 | Paas | Jul 1998 | A |
5788004 | Friedmann et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5846157 | Reinke et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5893092 | Driscoll | Apr 1999 | A |
5942195 | Lecea et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964199 | Atago et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974788 | Hepburn et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6029626 | Bruestle | Feb 2000 | A |
6035640 | Kolmanovsky et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048620 | Zhong | Apr 2000 | A |
6055810 | Borland et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058700 | Yamashita et al. | May 2000 | A |
6067800 | Kolmanovsky et al. | May 2000 | A |
6076353 | Freudenberg et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6095127 | Kolmanovsky et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6105365 | Deeba et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6153159 | Engeler et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6161528 | Akao et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170259 | Boegner et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6171556 | Burk et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178743 | Hirota et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178749 | Kolmanovsky et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6216083 | Ulyanov et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6237330 | Takahashi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6242873 | Drozdz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263672 | Roby et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6273060 | Cullen | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279551 | Iwano et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6312538 | Latypov et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321538 | Hasler | Nov 2001 | B2 |
6338245 | Shimoda et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347619 | Whiting et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6360159 | Miller et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360541 | Waszkiewicz et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6360732 | Bailey et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6379281 | Collins et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6425371 | Majima | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6427436 | Allansson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6431160 | Sugiyama et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6463733 | Asik et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463734 | Tamura et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470682 | Gray, Jr. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6470866 | Cook | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6502391 | Hirota et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6512974 | Houston et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6546329 | Bellinger | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6560528 | Gitlin et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6571191 | York et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6579206 | Liu et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6598851 | Schiavone et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6612293 | Schweinzer et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6625978 | Eriksson et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6629408 | Murakami et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6647710 | Nishiyama et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6647971 | Vaughan et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6671603 | Cari et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6672060 | Buckland et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6679050 | Takahashi et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6687597 | Sulatisky et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6705084 | Allen et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6726174 | Bareis et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6742330 | Genderen | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758037 | Terada et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6789533 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6823667 | Braun et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6823675 | Brunell et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6826903 | Yahata et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6827061 | Nytomt et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
20010002591 | Majima | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020029564 | Roth et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020056434 | Flamig-Vetter et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020098975 | Kimura et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020170550 | Mitsutani | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020173919 | Moteki et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184879 | Lewis | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194835 | Bromberg et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030022752 | Liu et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030041590 | Kitajima et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030089101 | Tanaka et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101713 | Dalla Betta et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120410 | Cari et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030143957 | Lyon | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145837 | Esteghlal et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030150422 | Huh | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172907 | Nytomt et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030200016 | Spillane et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030221679 | Surnilla | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030225507 | Tamura | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040006973 | Makki et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040007211 | Kobayashi | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040007217 | Poola et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040025837 | Hunt et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040034460 | Folkerts et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040040283 | Yasui et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040040287 | Beutel et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040050037 | Betta et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040055278 | Miyoshi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040060284 | Roberts, Jr. et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040074226 | Tanaka | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040089279 | McLaughlin et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040118117 | Hartman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128058 | Andres et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040129259 | Mitsutani | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040134464 | Mogi | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040135584 | Nagy et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139735 | Zhu | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139951 | Fisher et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040249558 | Meaney | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 02101208 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2004027230 | Apr 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060117750 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |