The present invention concerns an ejection device for a furniture portion mounted movably in or on a furniture body, comprising an ejector, a drive unit, and a slipping clutch. The slipping clutch is so designed that it uncouples the drive unit and the ejector from each other when a predetermined torque is exceeded.
An ejection device of that kind is to be found, for example, in FIGS. 10 and 11 of AT 413 472 B. The slipping clutch shown therein comprises a spring ring which is enlarged upon an excess loading and which slides over entrainment projections non-rotatably connected to the ejector to be driven, whereby uncoupling of the drive unit and the ejector from each other takes place.
The ejector of the ejection device is pivoted over a limited angular range by the drive unit. To eject the movable furniture portion, the ejector is pivoted in the direction of the movable furniture portion to apply the ejection force thereto. Thereafter, the ejector has to be put back into its starting position again, which is effected by a pivotal movement of the ejector in a direction of rotation which is opposite in relation to the ejection process.
The slipping clutch serves to prevent damage to the drive unit which can be caused by the application of an excessive force to the ejector which is coupled to the drive unit.
By way of example, the movable furniture portion can be pushed into its closed position by a user by a relatively high force before the ejector has moved back into its starting condition. When the movable furniture portion impacts against the ejector, the resulting force impact which is transmitted to the drive unit by way of the ejector can give rise to damage to or indeed destruction of the drive unit.
On the other hand, blocking of the movable furniture portion can occur during the ejection process. In that case there is also the fear of damage to the drive unit if the arrangement does not have an electronic regulating system which switches off the drive unit when a predetermined current strength is exceeded.
The object of the invention is to provide an alternative configuration for an ejection device which is safeguarded by a slipping clutch.
That object is attained by an ejection device having the features of the present invention.
The construction of the slipping clutch in accordance with the invention can provide that the torque at which uncoupling of the drive unit from the ejector takes place (override torque) can be selected to be different for each of the above-outlined situations. By way of example, the override torque can be selected to be relatively low after termination of the ejection process during the return of the ejector to its starting position as, in ordinary regular operation, there should in any case not be any external force applied to the ejector.
On the other hand the override torque should be set relatively high during the ejection process in order to prevent the slipping clutch from slipping during a per se ordinary and regular ejection process.
A structurally particularly simple configuration of the invention is one in which a spring co-operates with two portions in such a way that, upon a rotary movement of the two portions in a first one of two directions of rotation, there is a reduction in the diameter of the spring. The reduction in the diameter of the spring causes an increase in the coupling force of the two portions of the slipping clutch. That is equivalent to an increase in the override torque (that is to say, the torque at which uncoupling occurs is increased in relation to the value which was present prior to the reduction in the diameter of the spring). It can further be provided that the spring co-operates with the two portions in such a way that, upon a rotary movement of the two portions in a second one of the two directions of rotation, there is an enlargement of the spring. That involves a reduction in the override torque in relation to the override torque applicable prior to the expansion of the spring, in particular also in relation to the override torque which is present upon a reduction in the diameter of the spring.
In principle, it is preferable for the spring to be in the form of a coil spring because the fact that the coil spring extends three-dimensionally in the direction of the spring axis means that the spring can be well wound around a component. It would, however, also be conceivable to use a spring in the form of a spiral spring.
The mode of operation of the slipping clutch according to the invention is further enhanced if it is provided that the first portion has entrainment pins and the second portion has a toothed disc, wherein in the coupled condition of the slipping clutch the spring presses the entrainment pins against the toothed disc. If the override torque exceeds a predetermined value, the entrainment pins slip in relation to the toothed disc. That effect is also enhanced by the above-described advantageous measures in regard to the spring as, upon a reduction in the diameter of the spring, that means that the slipping action is made more difficult (and that therefore gives an increased override torque) while when the spring is enlarged that makes the slipping action easier (and therefore results in a reduction in the override torque).
In itself, the ejector can be coupled either to the first or the second portion of the slipping clutch. A particularly preferred embodiment is one in which the first portion of the slipping clutch is coupled to the ejector and the second portion of the slipping clutch is coupled to the drive unit.
It may be desirable for the slipping clutch to be designed in such a way that no uncoupling whatsoever occurs in one of the two possible directions of rotation of the two portions of the slipping clutch relative to each other. That may be desirable for example if, during the ejection process, there is in any case an electronic protective regulating system which prevents an excessive amount of force being applied by the drive unit. In that case, during the ejection process, a particularly high torque can be transmitted to the ejector and thus the movable furniture portion without that involving triggering of the slipping clutch. At the same time, however, this ensures that no harmful forces can be transmitted to the drive unit by way of the ejector during the return movement of the ejector to its starting position.
A further variant of the invention concerns an ejection device for a furniture portion mounted movably in or on a furniture body, comprising an ejector, a drive unit and a slipping clutch. The slipping clutch is so designed that it uncouples the drive unit and the ejector from each other when a predetermined torque is exceeded, in particular a slipping clutch according to one of the above-described embodiments, wherein the ejector is in the form of a lever and the slipping clutch is integrated in the lever.
Integration of the slipping clutch in the lever affords a particularly simple structure for the ejection device as it is possible to use both a commercially usual drive unit and also a commercially usual transmission arrangement which is usually connected between the drive unit and the lever.
It is particularly preferably provided that the axis about which the two portions of the slipping clutch are rotatable relative to each other forms the axis of rotation for the lever.
Further advantages and details of the invention will be apparent from the following Figures and the related specific description. In the Figures:
a and 4b show a partial view of the ejection device shown in
a and 5b show a detail view of
a, 6b and 6c show a further detail as a plan view, a first sectional view and a second sectional view.
In
a and 4b now show the structure of an embodiment of a slipping clutch 6 according to the invention in detail. In particular
In the coupled condition of the slipping clutch 6, the three entrainment pins 10 engage into the recesses which can be seen on the toothed discs 11 so that overall an uninterrupted line of force is formed between the drive unit 5 and the ejector 4 (by way of the transmission arrangement 13, the second portion 8, the toothed discs 11, the entrainment pins 10 and the first portion 7). When the two portions 7, 8 rotate in a first one of the two possible directions of rotation, that leads to a reduction in the diameter of the spring 9 whereby the entrainment pins 10 are pressed more firmly against the toothed discs 11. That leads to an increase in the override torque. If, in contrast, the two portions 7, 8 are rotated relative to each other in the second of the two directions of rotation (opposite the first direction), that leads to an expansion of the spring 9 whereby the entrainment pins 10 can escape (move) radially outwardly away from the toothed discs 11. That interrupts the transmission of force (torque) between the drive unit 5 and the ejector 4 and represents the uncoupled condition of the slipping clutch 6.
a and 5b show a perspective view and a plan view, respectively, of the slipping clutch 6 in isolated form.
b and 6c show sectional views corresponding to the lines shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
A 188/2006 | Feb 2006 | AT | national |
This application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/AT2006/000527, filed Dec. 20, 2006.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2868001 | Russell | Jan 1959 | A |
3450365 | Kaplan | Jun 1969 | A |
3877259 | Bishop | Apr 1975 | A |
5234089 | Itomi et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5337971 | Niedospial, Jr. | Aug 1994 | A |
5924536 | Frenken | Jul 1999 | A |
6309303 | Vodicka | Oct 2001 | B1 |
7270429 | Peterson | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7712592 | Jansen et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7740045 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7793560 | Bodine et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7868578 | Scheffknecht et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20030050121 | Takada et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040077410 | Gibbons et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050091928 | Okulov et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060016283 | Owa et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070180654 | Gasser | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090038904 | Bosk | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100037715 | Gasser | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100178990 | Jansen et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100276244 | Bodine et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110092295 | Wernz et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
41 34 72 | Mar 2006 | AT |
196 15 415 | Oct 1997 | DE |
203 08 256 | Jun 2004 | DE |
10 2004 017 415 | Oct 2005 | DE |
0 503 161 | Sep 1992 | EP |
1 201 951 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1 201 951 | May 2002 | EP |
2006017864 | Feb 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080290774 A1 | Nov 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/AT2006/000527 | Dec 2006 | US |
Child | 12222044 | US |