This disclosure is protected under United States and International Copyright Laws. © 2016 Jetoptera. All rights reserved. A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyrights whatsoever.
Aircrafts that can hover, take off and land vertically are commonly referred to as Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) aircrafts. This classification includes fixed-wing aircrafts as well as helicopters and aircraft with tilt-able powered rotors. Some VTOL aircrafts can operate in other modes as well, such as Short Take-Off and Landing (STOL). VTOL is a subset of V/STOL (Vertical and/or Short Take-off and Landing).
For illustrative purposes, an example of a current aircraft that has VTOL capability is the F-35 Lightning. Conventional methods of vectoring the vertical lift airflow includes the use of nozzles that can be swiveled in a single direction along with the use of two sets of flat flapper vanes arranged 90 degrees to each other and located at the external nozzle. The propulsion system of the F-35 Lightning, similarly, provides vertical lifting force using a combination of vectored thrust from the turbine engine and a vertically oriented lift fan. The lift fan is located behind the cockpit in a bay with upper and lower clamshell doors. The engine exhausts through a three-bearing swivel nozzle that can deflect the thrust from horizontal to just forward of vertical. Roll control ducts extend out in each wing and are supplied with their thrust with air from the engine fan. Pitch control is affected via lift fan/engine thrust split. Yaw control is through yaw motion of the engine swivel nozzle. Roll control is provided by differentially opening and closing the apertures at the ends of the two roll control ducts. The lift fan has a telescoping “D”-shaped nozzle to provide thrust deflection in the forward and aft directions. The D-nozzle has fixed vanes at the exit aperture.
The design of an aircraft or drone more generally consists of its propulsive elements and the airframe into which those elements are integrated. Conventionally, the propulsive device in aircrafts can be a turbojet, turbofan, turboprop or turboshaft, piston engine, or an electric motor equipped with a propeller. The propulsive system (propulsor) in small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is conventionally a piston engine or an electric motor which provides power via a shaft to one or several propellers. The propulsor for a larger aircraft, whether manned or unmanned, is traditionally a jet engine or a turboprop. The propulsor is generally attached to the fuselage or the body or the wings of the aircraft via pylons or struts capable of transmitting the force to the aircraft and sustaining the loads. The emerging mixed jet (jet efflux) of air and gases is what propels the aircraft in the opposite direction to the flow of the jet efflux.
Conventionally, the air stream efflux of a large propeller is not used for lift purposes in level flight and a significant amount of kinetic energy is hence not utilized to the benefit of the aircraft, unless it is swiveled as in some of the applications existing today (namely the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey). Rather, the lift on most existing aircrafts is created by the wings and tail. Moreover, even in those particular VTOL applications (e.g., take-off through the transition to level flight) found in the Osprey, the lift caused by the propeller itself is minimal during level flight, and most of the lift force is nonetheless from the wings.
The current state of art for creating lift on an aircraft is to generate a high-speed airflow over the wing and wing elements, which are generally airfoils. Airfoils are characterized by a chord line extended mainly in the axial direction, from a leading edge to a trailing edge of the airfoil. Based on the angle of attack formed between the incident airflow and the chord line, and according to the principles of airfoil lift generation, lower pressure air is flowing over the suction (upper) side and conversely, by Bernoulli law, moving at higher speeds than the lower side (pressure side). The lower the airspeed of the aircraft, the lower the lift force, and higher surface area of the wing or higher angles of incidence are required, including for take-off.
Large UAVs make no exception to this rule. Lift is generated by designing a wing airfoil with the appropriate angle of attack, chord, wingspan, and camber line. Flaps, slots and many other devices are other conventional tools used to maximize the lift via an increase of lift coefficient and surface area of the wing, but it will be generating the lift corresponding to at the air-speed of the aircraft. (Increasing the area (S) and lift coefficient (CO allow a similar amount of lift to be generated at a lower aircraft airspeed (VO) according to the formula L=½ρV2SCL, but at the cost of higher drag and weight.) These current techniques also perform poorly with a significant drop in efficiency under conditions with high cross winds.
While smaller UAVs arguably use the thrust generated by propellers to lift the vehicle, the current technology strictly relies on control of the electric motor speeds, and the smaller UAV may or may not have the capability to swivel the motors to generate thrust and lift, or transition to a level flight by tilting the propellers. Furthermore, the smaller UAVs using these propulsion elements suffer from inefficiencies related to batteries, power density, and large propellers, which may be efficient in hovering but inefficient in level flight and create difficulties and danger when operating due to the fast moving tip of the blades. Most current quadcopters and other electrically powered aerial vehicles are only capable of very short periods of flight and cannot efficiently lift or carry large payloads, as the weight of the electric motor system and battery may already be well exceeding 70% of the weight of the vehicle at all times of the flight. A similar vehicle using jet fuel or any other hydrocarbon fuel typically used in transportation will carry more usable fuel by at least one order of magnitude. This can be explained by the much higher energy density of the hydrocarbon fuel compared to battery systems (by at least one order of magnitude), as well as the lower weight to total vehicle weight ratio of a hydrocarbon fuel based system.
Accordingly, there is a need for enhanced efficiency, improved capabilities, and other technological advancements in aircrafts, particularly to UAVs and certain manned aerial vehicles.
This application is intended to describe one or more embodiments of the present invention. It is to be understood that the use of absolute terms, such as “must,” “will,” and the like, as well as specific quantities, is to be construed as being applicable to one or more of such embodiments, but not necessarily to all such embodiments. As such, embodiments of the invention may omit, or include a modification of, one or more features or functionalities described in the context of such absolute terms. In addition, the headings in this application are for reference purposes only and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of the present invention.
One embodiment of the present invention includes a propulsor that utilizes fluidics for the entrainment and acceleration of ambient air and delivers a high speed jet efflux of a mixture of the high pressure gas (supplied to the propulsor from a gas generator) and entrained ambient air. In essence, this objective is achieved by discharging the gas adjacent to a convex surface. The convex surface is a so-called Coanda surface benefitting from the Coanda effect described in U.S. Pat. No. 2,052,869 issued to Henri Coanda on Sep. 1, 1936. In principle, the Coanda effect is the tendency of a jet-emitted gas or liquid to travel close to a wall contour even if the direction of curvature of the wall is away from the axis of the jet. The convex Coanda surfaces discussed herein with respect to one or more embodiments does not have to consist of any particular material.
The mix of the stream 600 and the air 1 may be moving purely axially at a throat section 225 of the ejector 200. Through diffusion in a diffusing structure, such as diffuser 210, the mixing and smoothing out process continues so the profiles of temperature (800) and velocity (700) in the axial direction of ejector 200 no longer have the high and low values present at the throat section 225, but become more uniform at the terminal end 101 of diffuser 210. As the mixture of the stream 600 and the air 1 approaches the exit plane of terminal end 101, the temperature and velocity profiles are almost uniform. In particular, the temperature of the mixture is low enough to be directed towards an airfoil such as a wing or control surface.
In an embodiment, intake structure 206 and/or terminal end 101 may be circular in configuration. However, in varying embodiments, and as best shown in
The local flow over airfoil 100 is at higher speed than the speed of the aircraft, due to higher velocity of ejector 200 exit jet efflux, denoted by arrows 300, in comparison with aircraft airspeed denoted by arrow 500. The ejector 200 mixes vigorously the hotter motive stream 600 (
In this embodiment of the present invention, the secondary airfoil 506 will see a moderately higher temperature due to mixing of the motive fluid produced by the gas generator 501 (also referred to as the primary fluid) and the secondary fluid, which is ambient air, entrained by the motive fluid at a rate between 5-25 parts of secondary fluid per each primary fluid part. As such, the temperature that the secondary airfoil 506 sees is a little higher than the ambient temperature, but significantly lower than the motive fluid, allowing for the materials of the secondary wing to support and sustain the lift loads, according to the formula: Tmix=(Tmotive+ER*Tamb)/(1+ER) where Tmix is the final fluid mixture temperature of the jet efflux emerging from the ejector 502, ER is the entrainment rate of parts of ambient air entrained per part of motive air, Tmotive is the hotter temperature of the motive or primary fluid, and Tamb is the approaching ambient air temperature.
Referring to
Each of the first and second augmenting airfoils 702, 902 has a leading edge 716, 916 disposed toward the primary airfoil, with the first augmenting airfoil opposing the second augmenting airfoil. In operation, the first and second augmenting airfoils 702, 902 define a diffusing region 802, therebetween and along their lengths, similar in function to diffuser 210 discussed above herein. The leading edges 716, 916 define an intake region 804 configured to receive and introduce to the diffusing region 802 the gas streams from plena 704, 904 and the fluid flowing over the primary airfoil 701. The diffusing region 802 includes a primary terminal end 806 configured to provide egress from the diffusing region for the introduced gas streams and fluid flowing over the primary airfoil 701.
Although the foregoing text sets forth a detailed description of numerous different embodiments, it should be understood that the scope of protection is defined by the words of the claims to follow. The detailed description is to be construed as exemplary only and does not describe every possible embodiment because describing every possible embodiment would be impractical, if not impossible. Numerous alternative embodiments could be implemented, using either current technology or technology developed after the filing date of this patent, which would still fall within the scope of the claims.
Thus, many modifications and variations may be made in the techniques and structures described and illustrated herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present claims. Accordingly, it should be understood that the methods and apparatus described herein are illustrative only and are not limiting upon the scope of the claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/213,465, filed Sep. 2, 2015, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1495185 | Kirgan | May 1924 | A |
1891166 | Leupold | Dec 1932 | A |
2585676 | Poisson-Quinton | Feb 1952 | A |
2593420 | Diehl | Apr 1952 | A |
2684817 | Roy | Jul 1954 | A |
2796731 | Morley | Jun 1957 | A |
2870600 | Brown | Jan 1959 | A |
2885162 | Griswold | May 1959 | A |
2922277 | Bertin | Jan 1960 | A |
2928238 | Hawkins, Jr. | Mar 1960 | A |
2988303 | Coanda | Jun 1961 | A |
2989845 | Howald | Jun 1961 | A |
3028121 | Klapproth | Apr 1962 | A |
3045947 | Bertin et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
3047208 | Coanda | Jul 1962 | A |
3051413 | Pouit | Aug 1962 | A |
3055614 | Thompson | Sep 1962 | A |
3085770 | Sutton | Apr 1963 | A |
3098352 | Taub et al. | Jul 1963 | A |
3116041 | Hoerrner | Dec 1963 | A |
3161377 | Balluff | Dec 1964 | A |
3174707 | Ricard | Mar 1965 | A |
3216653 | Nabour | Nov 1965 | A |
3318097 | Wood et al. | May 1967 | A |
3326500 | Lanier | Jun 1967 | A |
3330500 | Winborn | Jul 1967 | A |
3337121 | Coanda | Aug 1967 | A |
3347495 | Eberhardt et al. | Oct 1967 | A |
3396538 | Wetherbee, Jr. | Aug 1968 | A |
3441218 | Bucher | Apr 1969 | A |
3525474 | Von Ohain et al. | Aug 1970 | A |
3545701 | Bertin et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3605939 | Duthion | Sep 1971 | A |
3664611 | Harris | May 1972 | A |
3667680 | Weed | Jun 1972 | A |
3685614 | Coanda et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3694107 | Stein | Sep 1972 | A |
3722454 | Silvester | Mar 1973 | A |
3747855 | Vdoviak et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3756542 | Bertin | Sep 1973 | A |
3770227 | Von Ohain et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3795367 | Mocarski | Mar 1974 | A |
3829044 | Leslie et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3831887 | Fosness | Aug 1974 | A |
3834834 | Quinn | Sep 1974 | A |
3860200 | Petrushka | Jan 1975 | A |
3879939 | Markowski | Apr 1975 | A |
3885891 | Throndson | May 1975 | A |
3887146 | Bright | Jun 1975 | A |
3893638 | Kelley | Jul 1975 | A |
3926373 | Viets | Dec 1975 | A |
3941335 | Viets | Mar 1976 | A |
4019696 | Hirt et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4030289 | Kampe | Jun 1977 | A |
4030687 | Hapke | Jun 1977 | A |
4099691 | Swanson et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4257224 | Wygnanski et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4311291 | Gilbertson et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4332529 | Alperin | Jun 1982 | A |
4392621 | Viets | Jul 1983 | A |
4398683 | Schmetzer | Aug 1983 | A |
4398687 | Nichols, Jr. et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4445338 | Markowski et al. | May 1984 | A |
4448354 | Reznick et al. | May 1984 | A |
4477039 | Boulton et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4478378 | Capuani | Oct 1984 | A |
4482108 | Sutton | Nov 1984 | A |
4592202 | Stewart et al. | Jun 1986 | A |
4645140 | Bevilaqua et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4648571 | Gerhardt | Mar 1987 | A |
4666104 | Kelber | May 1987 | A |
4721126 | Horii | Jan 1988 | A |
4767083 | Koenig | Aug 1988 | A |
4815942 | Alperin et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4819876 | Thayer | Apr 1989 | A |
4840329 | Szuminski et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4848701 | Belloso | Jul 1989 | A |
4941628 | Sakamoto et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4969614 | Capuani | Nov 1990 | A |
5016837 | Willis | May 1991 | A |
5062588 | Garland | Nov 1991 | A |
5071088 | Betts | Dec 1991 | A |
5074759 | Cossairt | Dec 1991 | A |
5098034 | Lendriet | Mar 1992 | A |
5167383 | Nozaki | Dec 1992 | A |
5205119 | Bulman | Apr 1993 | A |
5214914 | Billig et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5328098 | Barcza et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5372337 | Kress et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5398499 | Urruela | Mar 1995 | A |
5769317 | Sokhey et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5799874 | Eigenbrode et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5924632 | Seiner et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5992140 | Hammond et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5992792 | Arnason | Nov 1999 | A |
6003301 | Bratkovich et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6082635 | Seiner et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6105901 | Ulanoski et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6295805 | Lackey et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318668 | Ulanoski et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336319 | Koshoffer | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6382559 | Sutterfield et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6751944 | Lair | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6808140 | Moller | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6866503 | Ladharam | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6877960 | Presz, Jr. et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6880784 | Wilkinson et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6926229 | Cummings et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6983587 | Shumate | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7032835 | Murphy et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7128082 | Cerretelli et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7290738 | Rogers et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7753309 | Garreau | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7788899 | Smith | Sep 2010 | B2 |
D626056 | Garreau | Oct 2010 | S |
7823838 | De ning | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7878458 | Shmilovich et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7878798 | Poe | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8087618 | Shmilovich et al. | Jan 2012 | B1 |
D665333 | Oliver | Aug 2012 | S |
8240125 | Kawai | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8251306 | Dacre | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8302903 | Morgan et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8529247 | Poe et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8657053 | Novikov-Kopp | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8769959 | Baker et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8844264 | Khalid | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8910482 | Parham | Dec 2014 | B2 |
D724001 | Garreau | Mar 2015 | S |
9499266 | Garreau | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9714082 | Shmilovich et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
20040036185 | Garcia | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20060000943 | Ouellette et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060027679 | Gratteau | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060151633 | Presz, Jr. et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080315042 | Evulet et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090108141 | Shmilovich et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090158705 | Grossi | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090212166 | Garreau | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090214338 | Werle et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100019079 | Evulet et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100162679 | Khalid | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100181433 | Catino | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20110215204 | Evulet | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20130087632 | Germain | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130336781 | Rolt et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20130343866 | Christians | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140352276 | Chen et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140373546 | Ammon et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20160375986 | Shmilovich | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170060140 | Harrison | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202508281 | Oct 2012 | CN |
102991669 | Mar 2013 | CN |
103419933 | Dec 2013 | CN |
1024364 | Feb 1958 | DE |
0078245 | May 1983 | EP |
0244336 | Nov 1987 | EP |
0739291 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1332026 | Oct 1973 | GB |
2451347 | Jan 2009 | GB |
2508023 | May 2014 | GB |
9620867 | Jul 1996 | WO |
2005099380 | Oct 2005 | WO |
2013037610 | Mar 2013 | WO |
2014199351 | Dec 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2016/44326, dated Jun. 5, 2017, 19 pages. |
European Extended Search Report for Application No. 18165126.6, dated Jun. 6, 2018, 8 pages. |
European Extended Search Report for Application No. 18165121.7, dated Jun. 6, 2018, 8 pages. |
European Extended Search Report for Application No. 16855888.0, dated Apr. 16, 2019, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170057648 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62213465 | Sep 2015 | US |