The present disclosure relates to refrigeration. More particularly, it relates to ejector refrigeration systems.
Earlier proposals for ejector refrigeration systems are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,836,318 and 3,277,660.
In the normal mode of operation, gaseous refrigerant is drawn by the compressor 22 through the suction line 56 and inlet 24 and compressed and discharged from the discharge port 26 into the discharge line 28. In the heat rejection heat exchanger, the refrigerant loses/rejects heat to a heat transfer fluid (e.g., fan-forced air or water or other liquid). Cooled refrigerant exits the heat rejection heat exchanger via the outlet 34 and enters the ejector primary inlet 40 via the line 36.
The exemplary ejector 38 (
Use of an ejector serves to recover pressure/work. Work recovered from the expansion process is used to compress the gaseous refrigerant prior to entering the compressor. Accordingly, the pressure ratio of the compressor (and thus the power consumption) may be reduced for a given desired evaporator pressure. The quality of refrigerant entering the evaporator may also be reduced. Thus, the refrigeration effect per unit mass flow may be increased (relative to the non-ejector system). The distribution of fluid entering the evaporator is improved (thereby improving evaporator performance). Because the evaporator does not directly feed the compressor, the evaporator is not required to produce superheated refrigerant outflow. The use of an ejector cycle may thus allow reduction or elimination of the superheated zone of the evaporator. This may allow the evaporator to operate in a two-phase state which provides a higher heat transfer performance (e.g., facilitating reduction in the evaporator size for a given capability).
The exemplary ejector may be a fixed geometry ejector or may be a controllable ejector.
Various modifications of such ejector systems have been proposed. One example in US20070028630 involves placing a second evaporator along the line 46. US20040123624 discloses a system having two ejector/evaporator pairs. Another two-evaporator, single-ejector system is shown in US20080196446.
One aspect of the disclosure involves a system having a compressor. A heat rejection heat exchanger is coupled to the compressor to receive refrigerant compressed by the compressor. An ejector has a primary inlet coupled with heat rejection heat exchanger to receive refrigerant, a secondary inlet, and an outlet. The system has a heat absorption heat exchanger. The system includes means for providing at least of a 1-10% quality refrigerant to the heat absorption heat exchanger and an 85-99% quality refrigerant to at least one of the compressor and, if present, a suction line heat exchanger.
In various implementations, an expansion device may be immediately upstream of the heat absorption heat exchanger. The refrigerant may comprise at least 50% carbon dioxide, by weight.
Other aspects of the disclosure involve methods for operating the system.
The details of one or more embodiments are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements.
Whereas the separator 48 of
For example, by feeding a two-phase mixture into the compressor, the discharge temperature of the compressor can be reduced if desired (thus extending the compressor system operating range). Feeding a suction line heat exchanger (SLHX—discussed below) and/or compressor with small amount liquid are also expected to improve both SLHX and compressor efficiency. Exemplary refrigerant is delivered as 85-99% quality (vapor mass flow percentage), more narrowly, 90-98% or 94-98%. The power required for compression of a vapor increases which increased suction enthalpy. For hermetic compressors the refrigerant vapor is used to cool the motor. For example, in many compressors, the suction flow is first passed over the motor before entering the compression chamber (raising the temperature of refrigerant reaching the compression chamber). By supplying a small amount of liquid in the vapor of the suction flow, the motor can be cooled while reducing the temperature increase of the refrigerant as it passes over the motor. Furthermore, some compressors are tolerant of small amounts of liquid entering the suction chamber. If the compression process is begun with some liquid, the refrigerant will remain cooler than it otherwise would, and less power is required for the compression process. This is especially beneficial with refrigerants that exhibit a large degree of heating during compression, such as CO2. The negative side of providing liquid refrigerant to the compressor is that the liquid is no longer available for producing cooling in the evaporator 64. The optimum choice of quality provided to line 56 is determined by the specific characteristics of the system to balance these considerations.
A small amount of liquid refrigerant can also be used to improve the performance of a SLHX. SLHXs are typically of counter-flow design. The total heat transfer is limited by the fluid side that has the minimum product of flow rate and specific heat. For a refrigeration system SLHX with pure vapor on the cold side and pure liquid on the hot side, the cold-side vapor is limiting. However, a small amount of liquid provided to the cold-side effectively increases its specific heat. Thus more heat may be transferred from the same SLHX, or conversely, for the same heat transfer a smaller heat exchanger may be used if a small amount of liquid is added to the vapor.
Also by feeding a two-phase mixture to the expansion valve upstream of the evaporator one can precisely control the system capacity, which can prevent unnecessary system shutdowns (comfort and improved reliability) and improve temperature control. This may help improve refrigerant distribution in the evaporator manifold and further improve evaporator performance Exemplary refrigerant is delivered as 1-10% quality (vapor mass flow percentage), more narrowly 2-6%. Direct expansion evaporators typically have poor heat transfer in the very low and very high quality ranges. For these evaporator designs providing higher quality may improve the heat transfer coefficient at the entrance region of the evaporator (where quality is the lowest).
The system 170 replaces the separator with means for providing at least one of the 1-10% quality refrigerant to the heat absorption heat exchanger and the 90-99% quality refrigerant to at least one of the compressor and, at present, a suction line heat exchanger.
Exemplary means 180 (
The exemplary first outlet 186 is at the downstream end of a U-tube (or J-tube) 190. The U-tube extends to a second end (gas inlet end) 192 open to the headspace 194 of the tank for drawing a flow 196 of gas from the headspace. A lower portion (trough or base) 198 of the U-tube is immersed in the liquid refrigerant accumulation 200 in a lower portion of the tank, below the headspace. To entrain the desired amount of liquid 202 into the gas flow to form the high quality flow 187, or more holes 204 may be formed along the U-tube, including in the lower portion 198. The hole sizing and locations are configured to provide the desired quality of two phase mixture entering the SLHX and/or compressor. An exemplary hole size for a drilled hole 204 is 0.01 inch-0.5 inch (0.25 mm-12.7 mm), more narrowly 0.2-0.3 inch (5.1-7.6 mm). Multiple holes may be used and may be placed to achieve desired results.
To provide the small amount of gas in the low quality flow 189, one or more vapor line tubes 220 may extend from a portion 222 having one or more gas inlets (holes) 224 in the headspace. An exemplary portion 222 is a closed and an upper portion. A second portion 226 (a lower portion) has one or more holes 228 within the liquid accumulation 200. The sizes of the holes 228 and 224 are selected so that a flow 230 of gaseous refrigerant is drawn through the holes 224 and becomes entrained in a flow of liquid refrigerant 232 drawn through the holes 228 to provide the desired composition of the low quality flow 189. Exemplary size for the holes 224 is up to two inches (50 mm) in diameter for drilled holes or equivalent area for others, more narrowly, 0.1-0.5 inches (2.5-13 mm) or 0.1-0.3 inches (2.5-7.6 mm). Exemplary size for the holes 228 is 0.1-2 inches in diameter for drilled holes or equivalent area for others, more narrowly f 0.2-1.0 inches (5-25 mm) or 0.25-0.75 inches (6.35-19.1 mm). The ratio of hole sizes (#224 vapor to 228 liquid) is 0 to 0.9; more narrowly 0.1 to 0.5; more narrowly 0.1 to 0.3.
In one exemplary implementation, the inlet tube has an inner diameter (ID) of 15.9 mm which corresponds to a particular standard tube size. Other sizes may be used depending upon system requirements. In the example, the holes 246 are grouped in two rows of five holes with each hole of one group diametrically opposite an associated hole of the other group. The exemplary holes are 0.25 inch (6.35 mm) in diameter. Other patterns of holes may be provided. For example, the patterns may be provided to create specific flow patterns, to accommodate other internal components, or the like. Similarly, hole orientation may be varied off radial or off horizontal. For example, angling of the holes upward at angles of up to 45° off horizontal/radial may allow the flows along the sidewall to use more of the sidewall. More broadly, an exemplary tube size for the inlet conduit or an insert therein is one eighth of an inch to two inches (3.2 mm-50.8 mm). Similarly, an exemplary range of hole sizes (especially for drilled holes) is 0.8 mm-20 mm in diameter depending upon the desired flow rate, conduit size, etc. Non-circular holes may have similar exemplary cross-sectional areas. An exemplary ratio of total hole area to local tube internal cross-sectional area is 0.5-20, more narrowly 1-5 or 1-2.
The selection of hole geometry, size, and positioning may be iteratively optimized to provide desired approximate separator outlet flow conditions for a given target operating condition. Under an actual range of operating conditions, there may otherwise be departures from the desired qualities of the separator outlet flows. There may be active control by the controller 140 (e.g., by processor running a program stored in memory to provide the control) so as to achieve a desired flow composition (or at least closer to desired). In one set of examples, a sensor system used is a dual sensor system (e.g., dual thermistor) wherein the first sensor (e.g., thermistor) is allowed to self heat (e.g., by providing excess current beyond the recommended input for operating the sensor) and the other sensor acts as a regular sensor and measures the temperature (e.g., a thermocouple, resistance temperature detector, or thermistor). The self-heat sensor heats up relatively more when it senses vapor than when it senses liquid. The quality can then be calculated by the controller via the reading difference between the self-heat sensor and the regular sensor (based upon the known performance difference of the two sensors).
A first exemplary pair of these sensors 600 (self heat sensor) and 602 (regular sensor) is shown in the suction line 56 between the outlet 186 and the suction port 24 of
The controller may control the quality in line 74 downstream of the evaporator toward a desired value by controlling the valve 70. This, in turn has a smaller feedback effect on the quality discharged by the separator to the valve 70. Opening valve 70 decreases the quality (increasing liquid content) discharged from the evaporator; whereas closing valve 70 increases the quality (decreasing liquid content). If valve 70 is closed sufficiently, the refrigerant state in line 74 becomes superheated.
The controller may more directly control the quality of the refrigerant flow from the first outlet 86 than from the second outlet 88. However, this may be performed indirectly by varying the compressor speed to control quality in line 56 upstream of the compressor. Because the compressor speed is normally varied in order to control system capacity, this level of control would likely only be done if the quality exceeds an undesirable threshold. For example, if the quality must be kept above 90% to ensure proper compressor operation, when the controller detects that the quality drops below this threshold it may increase the compressor speed to increase the quality.
The system may be fabricated from conventional components using conventional techniques appropriate for the particular intended uses.
Although an embodiment is described above in detail, such description is not intended for limiting the scope of the present disclosure. It will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. For example, when implemented in the remanufacturing of an existing system or the reengineering of an existing system configuration, details of the existing configuration may influence or dictate details of any particular implementation. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
Benefit is claimed of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 61/367,097, filed Jul. 23, 2010, and entitled “Ejector Cycle Refrigerant Separator”, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if set forth at length.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/044626 | 7/20/2011 | WO | 00 | 7/13/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2012/012496 | 1/26/2012 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1836318 | Gay | Dec 1931 | A |
3277660 | Kemper et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
5531080 | Hirahara et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5996360 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6574987 | Takeuchi et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6901763 | Memory et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7086248 | Sakai et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7367202 | Yamada et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7690219 | Suzuki et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20040065112 | Sakai et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040123624 | Ohta et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040261449 | Memory et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070028630 | Yamada et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080196446 | Nakamura et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1316636 | Oct 2001 | CN |
10200811255 | Sep 2009 | DE |
1134517 | Sep 2001 | EP |
2002349978 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2007147198 | Jun 2007 | JP |
2010036480 | Apr 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2011/044626, dated Jan. 13, 2012. |
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201180036106.1, dated Sep. 2, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120291462 A1 | Nov 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61367097 | Jul 2010 | US |