Refuse vehicles collect a wide variety of waste, trash, and other material from residences and businesses. Operators use the refuse vehicle to transport the material from various waste receptacles within a municipality to a storage or processing facility (e.g., a landfill, an incineration facility, a recycling facility, etc.). To reduce the requisite number of trips between the waste receptacles and the storage or processing facility, the refuse may be emptied into a collection chamber (e.g., a hopper) of the refuse vehicle and thereafter compacted. Such compaction reduces the volume of the refuse and increases the carrying capacity of the refuse vehicle. The refuse is compacted in the collection chamber by an ejector that is forced against the refuse by actuators (e.g., pneumatic cylinders, hydraulic cylinders). To keep the ejector aligned with the walls of the collection chamber, portions of the ejector are constrained by tracks or rails.
Traditionally, an ear on each side of the ejector slides within a “C” channel formed along the collection chamber. Compacting forces and forces due to the weight of the ejector are applied at the interface between the ear and the ejector. However, the ear is supported by the body of the refuse vehicle in a location laterally outward from the interface between the ear and the ejector. The application of forces laterally inward from the “C” channel produces a cantilever loading arrangement, which increases the stresses on the ear, the ejector, and the vehicle body. The structural elements of these components (e.g., the plates, gussets, etc.) must be sized to carry this increased load, thereby increasing the weight of the refuse vehicle. Despite such an increase in weight, a cantilevered loading configuration remains the traditional method for supporting the ejector of a refuse vehicle.
One embodiment of the invention relates to an ejector for a refuse vehicle including a structural frame, a first shoe, and a second shoe. The structural frame includes a first side plate offset from a second side plate, and the distance between the first side plate and the second side plate defines a side plate spacing. The first shoe is coupled to the first side plate and includes a first surface configured to interface with a first ejector track. The second shoe is coupled to the second side plate and includes a second surface configured to interface with the second ejector track. A lateral spacing between the first surface and the second surface is less than or equal to the side plate spacing such that loading imparted on the structural frame is transmitted directly into the first ejector track and the second ejector track.
Another embodiment of the invention relates to a body assembly for a refuse vehicle. The body assembly includes a plurality of panels, a first ejector track, and a second ejector track. The plurality of panels define a chamber configured to contain a volume of refuse therein. The first ejector track is coupled to a first of the plurality of panels and includes a first upper wall including an outer edge and an inner edge and a first lower wall including an outer edge and an inner edge. The second ejector track is coupled to a second of the plurality of panels and offset from the first ejector track. The second ejector track includes a second upper wall including an outer edge and an inner edge and a second lower wall including an outer edge and an inner edge. The distance between the inner edge of the first upper wall and the inner edge of the second upper wall defines an upper wall spacing, and the distance between the inner edge of the first lower wall and the inner edge of the second lower wall defines a lower wall spacing. The upper wall spacing is greater than the lower wall spacing, and the first lower wall and the second lower wall define surfaces configured to directly support side plates of an ejector.
Still another embodiment of the invention relates to a refuse vehicle that includes a chassis, a body assembly, a ram, and a track. The body assembly is coupled to the chassis and includes a plurality of panels defining a chamber configured to contain a volume of refuse therein. The ram is positioned within the collection chamber and includes a side plate coupled to at least one of the plurality of panels with a shoe. The track is fixed to at least one of the plurality of panels and configured to receive the shoe. The track includes a lower wall positioned laterally below the side plate of the ram such that the forces and moments on the ram are transmitted directly into the track.
Yet another embodiment of the invention relates to a body assembly for a refuse vehicle. The body assembly includes a plurality of panels that extend along a longitudinal direction and define a chamber configured to contain a volume of refuse therein. The body assembly further includes a head wall extending laterally across the longitudinal direction. The head wall is coupled to the plurality of panels to form a corner. The corner is configured to receive an end of an actuator that compresses the volume of refuse.
The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being carried out in various ways. Alternative exemplary embodiments relate to other features and combinations of features as may be recited in the claims.
The disclosure will become more fully understood from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements, in which:
Before turning to the figures, which illustrate the exemplary embodiments in detail, it should be understood that the present application is not limited to the details or methodology set forth in the description or illustrated in the figures. It should also be understood that the terminology is for the purpose of description only and should not be regarded as limiting.
The total weight of a refuse vehicle is regulated by local, state, or federal agencies defining a maximum gross vehicle weight (e.g., a maximum gross weight for a vehicle on certain roadways). Weight savings derived from the construction of the refuse vehicle thereby allows for a corresponding increase in the cargo capacity (e.g., as measured in terms of weight) of the vehicle. According to an exemplary embodiment, a refuse vehicle includes an ejector and a corresponding ejector track designed to reduce the magnitude of stresses carried by a body assembly of the vehicle. Reducing the magnitude of stresses carried by a body assembly of the vehicle reduces the requisite thickness of material, amount of bracing, and number of other structural supports, which reduces the weight of the ejector and body assembly and increases the cargo-capacity of the refuse vehicle.
Referring to
According to an exemplary embodiment, refuse truck 10 is configured to transport refuse from various waste receptacles within a municipality to a storage or processing facility (e.g., a landfill, an incineration facility, a recycling facility, etc.). As shown in
Referring again to the exemplary embodiment shown in
Referring to the exemplary embodiment shown in
Referring next to
As shown in
Referring next to
Refuse is compacted from the hopper portion of compartment 20 to the storage portion of compartment 20 with a compacting stroke. During the compacting stroke, the ram (e.g., ejector 42) slides within compartment 20 on rails 50 along a longitudinal direction 60. As shown in
According to an exemplary embodiment, body 14 is rotatably coupled to the chassis of the refuse vehicle. An actuator may tip body 14 to empty refuse from the compartment 20 into another receptacle or collection area. According to an exemplary embodiment, body 14 is tipped backwards (e.g., the front end wall is lifted) with a hydraulic actuator (e.g., lift cylinders, dump cylinders, raise cylinders, etc.) to facilitate such an emptying operation. The tailgate may also be rotated with an actuator to expose the rear portion of compartment 20. According to an alternative embodiment, body 14 remains stationary, and the tailgate is lifted such that a rearward motion of the ram pushes refuse out from the compartment 20.
Referring again to the exemplary embodiment shown in
Referring next to the exemplary embodiment shown in
As shown in
With ejector 42 in a retracted position (e.g., in a position toward the front of the body assembly), refuse emptied into the hopper portion of the collection chamber contacts angled face 64, upper front face 66, and top shelf 68. The refuse thereafter falls into the collection chamber of the body assembly. Extension of hydraulic cylinders 44 slides ejector 42 rearward such that packing face 62, angled face 64, and upper front face 66 compress the refuse within the collection chamber. As shown in
According to an exemplary embodiment, ejector 42 further includes shoes, shown as projections 80. As shown in
Referring next to
Refuse may be unevenly distributed within the collection chamber of the body assembly (e.g., due to loading from only one lateral side of the refuse truck). By way of example, a first lateral side of the collection chamber may have refuse therein whereas a second lateral side of the collection chamber may be relatively free of refuse. Uneven distribution of the refuse may also occur due to the composition of the refuse whereby a first lateral side of the collection chamber includes stiff materials (e.g., metal products, plastic products, etc.) and a second lateral side of the collection chamber includes pliable materials (e.g., paper products, etc.). Extension of the actuators applies compaction forces to the first and second lateral sides of ejector 42. The application of such compaction forces to unevenly distributed refuse causes a twisting moment about at least one of first vertical axis 82, second vertical axis 84, and third vertical axis 86 (e.g., relatively dense refuse on the side of ejector 42 at second vertical axis 84 may cause a twisting moment about second vertical axis 84).
Refuse may be similarly unevenly distributed vertically within the collection chamber of the body assembly. By way of example, such uneven distribution may occur as denser refuse settles to the bottom of the collection chamber (e.g., as the refuse vehicle moves). Extension of the actuators applies compaction forces to ejector 42 at a fixed vertical position (e.g., where the actuators are coupled to ejector 42). An uneven distribution of refuse produces a tipping moment about a horizontal axis (e.g., lateral axis 88).
Such forces and moments are transferred through projections 80 into rails 50 and the body assembly of the refuse vehicle. According to an exemplary embodiment, the combination of projections 80 and rails 50 is intended to maintain linear movement of ejector 42 (e.g., prevent ejector 42 from tipping over). The actuators coupled to ejector 42 may impart large forces to compact the refuse positioned within the collection chamber. Such large forces produce large twisting and tipping moments, which are carried by projections 80 and rails 50.
Referring next to the detail view to
Rail 50 is manufactured (e.g., bent from a sheet of material) such that sidewall 94 is coupled to lower wall 90 with a first arcuate portion 93 and coupled to upper wall 92 with a second arcuate portion 95, according to an exemplary embodiment. As shown in
Referring again to the detail view shown in
According to an exemplary embodiment, a centerline of lower wear pad 96 and lower wear pad 106 defines a central axis 112. While central axis 112 is shown in
As shown in
According to an exemplary embodiment, the interface members are replaceable and provide bearing surfaces to allow ejector 42 to slide along rails 50 without direct contact between the metal structures of ejector 42 and rails 50. In other embodiments, ejector 42 may slide directly upon rails 50. In still other embodiments, a different mechanism facilitates movement between ejector 42 and rails 50 (e.g., rollers, low-friction surfaces, etc.). According to an exemplary embodiment, the interface members are manufactured from a material with a high wear resistance and a low coefficient of friction. According to an exemplary embodiment, the interface members are manufactured from a polymeric material (e.g., nylon). In one embodiment, the interface members are manufactured from self-lubricating nylon polymers (e.g., Nylatron®, etc.). The interface members are removably coupled to projections 80 and to rails 50 such that they may be replaced as they wear (e.g., coupled with bolts, rivets, etc.).
In some embodiments, a plurality of discrete interface members are provided along the length of rails 50 and projections 80. The interface members may be dimensioned and spaced to maintain contact between the interface members on projection 80 and those on rails 50 as ejector 42 moves along the length of the rails 50. According to other exemplary embodiments, the interface members on projections 80 and rails 50 are continuous strips. As shown in
Extension of the actuators forces ejector 42 into the refuse within the collection chamber. Uneven loading of the refuse within the collection chamber may produce twisting moments and tipping moments on ejector 42. Such twisting and tipping moments are resisted by contact between lower wear pad 96, upper wear pad 98, and angled wear pad 110 with lower wear pad 106, upper wear pad 108, and the second angled wear pad 110, respectively. Such twisting and tipping moments may cause asymmetrical loading on the interface members. By way of example, a forward tipping moment (e.g., where an upper end of ejector 42 is tipped toward the cab of the refuse vehicle) drives the rearward end of projection 80 upward into rail 50 and drives the forward end of projection 80 downward into rail 50. Such forces may be conveyed between projection 80 and rails 50 through the interface members, according to an exemplary embodiment.
Referring again to
Uneven loading between the two lateral sides of ejector 42 (e.g., due to an uneven distribution of refuse in the collection chamber, due to an uneven composition of refuse in the compartment 20, due to an uneven pressure applied by the hydraulic cylinders 44, etc.) produces a twisting moment on ejector 42. Twisting moments are resisted by the contact between the angled wear pads 110 and the upper wear pad 98 with the upper wear pad 108. Angling sidewalls 94 and sidewalls 104 centers ejector 42 within the collection chamber (e.g., laterally centers, etc.) thereby reducing the risk of unevenly wearing angled wear pads 110, upper wear pads 98, and upper wear pads 108.
The construction of the body assembly and compactor is intended to reduce the overall weight of the refuse vehicle, thereby allowing for an increase in the maximum refuse carrying capacity without exceeding gross vehicle weight regulations imposed on some roadways. A reduced number of components simplifies fixture designs and increases the ease of manufacturing. Support below the side plates of the ejector instead of in a cantilevered position allows for the direct transfer of vertical loads into the frame of the vehicle thereby reducing stresses on the ejector and the body.
The construction and arrangements of the refuse vehicle, as shown in the various exemplary embodiments, are illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc.) without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter described herein. Some elements shown as integrally formed may be constructed of multiple parts or elements, the position of elements may be reversed or otherwise varied, and the nature or number of discrete elements or positions may be altered or varied. The order or sequence of any process, logical algorithm, or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments. Other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may also be made in the design, operating conditions and arrangement of the various exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2179726 | Lewis | Nov 1939 | A |
2800234 | Herpich | Jul 1957 | A |
2911119 | Kuhnau | Nov 1959 | A |
3486646 | McCarthy | Dec 1969 | A |
3720863 | Ringland et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3729106 | Barbieri | Apr 1973 | A |
3899090 | Telesio | Aug 1975 | A |
4041470 | Slane et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4162714 | Correll | Jul 1979 | A |
4162735 | Lewis | Jul 1979 | A |
4180803 | Wesemeyer et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4355385 | Hampshire et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4453880 | Leisse | Jun 1984 | A |
4516121 | Moriyama et al. | May 1985 | A |
4542802 | Garvey et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
RE32140 | Tokuda et al. | May 1986 | E |
4639609 | Floyd et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4646232 | Chang et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4744218 | Edwards et al. | May 1988 | A |
4760275 | Sato et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4809177 | Windle et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4809803 | Ahern et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4842326 | DiVito | Jun 1989 | A |
4843557 | Ina et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4864151 | Wyczalek et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4864154 | Copeland et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4864568 | Sato et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4894781 | Sato et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4941546 | Nist et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4949808 | Garnett | Aug 1990 | A |
5025253 | DiLullo et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5062759 | Pieperhoff | Nov 1991 | A |
5071307 | Carson | Dec 1991 | A |
5091856 | Hasegawa et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5189617 | Shiraishi | Feb 1993 | A |
5202830 | Tsurumiya et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5215423 | Schulte-Hinsken et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5222853 | Carson | Jun 1993 | A |
5299129 | Uchida et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5301997 | Cudden | Apr 1994 | A |
5314290 | Lutz et al. | May 1994 | A |
5343675 | Norton | Sep 1994 | A |
5365436 | Schaller et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5416702 | Kitagawa et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418437 | Couture et al. | May 1995 | A |
5463992 | Swenson et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5470187 | Smith et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5484245 | Zopf | Jan 1996 | A |
5508689 | Rado et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5540037 | Lamb et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5553673 | Hackman | Sep 1996 | A |
5555171 | Sonehara et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5557257 | Gieffers | Sep 1996 | A |
5568023 | Grayer et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5595398 | Brown | Jan 1997 | A |
5601392 | Smith et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5623169 | Sugimoto et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5637933 | Rawlings et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5638272 | Minowa et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5651654 | Christenson | Jul 1997 | A |
5657224 | Lonn et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5670845 | Grant et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673017 | Dery et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5700026 | Zalewski et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5736925 | Knauff et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5739592 | Rigsby et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754021 | Kojima | May 1998 | A |
5769592 | Christenson | Jun 1998 | A |
5793648 | Nagle et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794165 | Minowa et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5816766 | Clark | Oct 1998 | A |
5819188 | Vos | Oct 1998 | A |
5826485 | Bayne et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5827957 | Wehinger | Oct 1998 | A |
5845221 | Hosokawa et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848365 | Coverdill | Dec 1998 | A |
5851100 | Brandt | Dec 1998 | A |
5856976 | Hirano | Jan 1999 | A |
5864781 | White | Jan 1999 | A |
5884206 | Kim | Mar 1999 | A |
5890080 | Coverdill et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890865 | Smith et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5896418 | Hamano et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5919237 | Balliet | Jul 1999 | A |
5931628 | Christenson | Aug 1999 | A |
5948025 | Sonoda | Sep 1999 | A |
5949330 | Hoffman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954470 | Duell et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957985 | Wong et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5987365 | Okamoto | Nov 1999 | A |
5997338 | Pohjola | Dec 1999 | A |
5999104 | Symanow et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012004 | Sugano et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6033041 | Koga et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038500 | Weiss | Mar 2000 | A |
6059058 | Dower | May 2000 | A |
6059511 | Anderson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6062803 | Christenson | May 2000 | A |
6065565 | Puszkiewicz et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070538 | Flamme et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075460 | Minissale et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091162 | Williams et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096978 | Pohjola | Aug 2000 | A |
6123497 | Duell et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6135806 | Pohjola | Oct 2000 | A |
6141610 | Rothert et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6152673 | Anderson et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154122 | Menze | Nov 2000 | A |
6158945 | Anderson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167795 | Bayne et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182807 | Saito et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6210094 | McNeilus et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223104 | Kamen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230496 | Hofmann et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6263269 | Dannenberg | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269295 | Gaugush et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6323565 | Williams et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6331365 | King | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332745 | Duell et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6338010 | Sparks et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356826 | Pohjola | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6404607 | Burgess et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405114 | Priestley et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421593 | Kempen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430164 | Jones et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6430488 | Goldman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6433442 | Maeckel et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434512 | Discenzo | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6482124 | Hormann et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6496775 | McDonald, Jr. et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6501368 | Wiebe et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6522955 | Colborn | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6553290 | Pillar | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565305 | Schrafel | May 2003 | B2 |
6580953 | Wiebe et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6611755 | Coffee et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6648367 | Breed et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6732035 | Miller et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6733036 | Breed et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6757597 | Yakes et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6761370 | Colet | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6865460 | Bray et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6882917 | Pillar et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885920 | Yakes et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6909944 | Pillar et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6917288 | Kimmel et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6922615 | Pillar et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928358 | Brooks et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6993421 | Pillar et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7006902 | Archer et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7024296 | Squires et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7072745 | Pillar et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7086818 | Pruteanu et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107129 | Rowe et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7127331 | Pillar et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7162332 | Pillar et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7164977 | Yakes et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7184862 | Pillar et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184866 | Squires et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7254468 | Pillar et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7277782 | Yakes et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7302320 | Nasr et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7559735 | Pruteanu et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7563066 | Jones et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7725225 | Pillar et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8182194 | Pruteanu et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
20020112688 | Fariz et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030031543 | Elbrink | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030085562 | Sparling | May 2003 | A1 |
20030151526 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030156020 | Masuda | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158635 | Pillar et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030165255 | Yanagawa et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030195680 | Pillar | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030200015 | Pillar | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030205422 | Morrow et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040055802 | Pillar et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040124697 | MacGregor et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133319 | Pillar et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040199302 | Pillar et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050004733 | Pillar et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050038934 | Gotze et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050872 | Kempf | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050113996 | Pillar et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119806 | Nasr et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131600 | Quiqley et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050135910 | Pruteanu | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050234622 | Pillar et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060201121 | Straka et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060226675 | Dunn | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070172341 | Gregory | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070251737 | Straka et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080027599 | Logan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080100704 | Venetianer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080137589 | Barrett | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090109049 | Frederick et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20120282077 | Alberts et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130251485 | Howell et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2518690 | Sep 2006 | CA |
2669342 | Nov 2010 | CA |
40 41 483 | Jun 1992 | DE |
101 03 922 | Aug 2002 | DE |
0 496 302 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0 504 913 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0 266 704 | Jun 1993 | EP |
0 630 831 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0 791 506 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0 894 739 | Feb 1999 | EP |
0 564 943 | Jun 2001 | EP |
1 229 636 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1 594 770 | Nov 2005 | EP |
1 667 924 | Jun 2006 | EP |
507046 | Mar 1998 | SE |
WO-9310591 | May 1993 | WO |
WO-9310951 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO-9515594 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO-9632346 | Oct 1996 | WO |
WO-9640573 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO-9702965 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO-9830961 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO-0069662 | Nov 2000 | WO |
WO-2004052756 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO-2005030614 | Apr 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Dana Spicer Central Tire Inflation System Specifications,” Dana Corporation, Kalamazoo, Michigan, May 2000 (2 pgs.). |
“HEMTT—Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck M977 Series Truck,” Product of Oshkosh Truck Corporation, Mar. 2000 (12 pgs. as photocopied). |
“LHS Decontamination Mission Module,” Product of Oshkosh Truck Corporation, see IDS for date (2 pgs. as photocopied). |
“LVS Logistic Vehicle System (MK48 Series),” Product of Oshkosh Truck Corporation, see IDS for date information (6 pgs.). |
“M1070F Heavy Equipment Transporter & Trailer”; Product of Oshkosh Truck Corporation, Sep. 2001 (8 pgs. as photocopied). |
“M1977 CBT (Common Bridge Transporter),” Product of Oshkosh Truck Corporation, see IDS for date information (2 pgs. as photocopied). |
“Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement,” Product of Oshkosh Truck Corporation, Aug. 2000 (6 pgs. as photocopied). |
“MTVR Dump Body Variant (Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement),” Product of Oshkosh Truck Corporation, Sep. 2001 (2 pgs. as photocopied). |
“MTVR Wrecker Variant (MK36 Wrecker Recovery Vehicle),” Product of Oshkosh Truck Corporation, Sep. 2001 (2 pgs. as photocopied). |
“Oshkosh Demonstrates ProPulse, the First Electric Hybrid-Drive Heavy Defense Truck,” Oshkosh Truck Corp., Feb. 27, 2000 (2 pgs.). |
“Oshkosh Receives Federal Government Funding to Develop ProPulse Alternative Drive System for Military Trucks,” Oshkosh Truck Corp., Aug. 31, 2001 (2 pgs.). |
“Oshkosh Showcases ProPulse Hybrid Electric System at Major Defense Exhibition,” Oshkosh Truck Corp., Oct. 21, 2002 (1 pg.). |
“Oshkosh Truck and Ohio State University Design Robotic Vehicle to Compete in Desert Race,” Oshkosh Truck Corp., Feb. 11, 2004 (2 pgs.). |
“Oshkosh Truck Awarded Contract for U.S. Army Future Tactical Truck Concepts and Technology Evaluations,” Oshkosh Truck Corp., Dec. 2, 2003 (2 pgs.). |
“Oshkosh Truck Rolls Out Next Generation of Command Zone Advanced Electronics System to Military Market,” Oshkosh Truck Corp., Oct. 21, 2002 (2 pgs.). |
“Oshkosh Trucks—75 Years of Specialty Truck Production,” Wright et al., Motorbooks International Publishers & Wholesalers, 1992, pp. 119-126 (10 pgs.). |
“Oshkosh Truck's Robotic Truck Qualifies for Pentagon's $1 Million Desert Race,” Oshkosh Truck Corp., Mar. 12, 2004 (2 pgs.). |
“Palletized Load System (PLS)—Concrete Mobile Mixer Module,” Product of Oshkosh Truck Corporation, see IDS for date information (2 pgs.). |
“Palletized Load System (PLS) Potable Water Distributor Module,” Product of Oshkosh Truck Corporation, see IDS for date information (2 pgs.). |
“The One to Count on Through Hell and High Water,” Product of Oshkosh Truck Corporation, Sep. 2000 (4 pgs.). |
Aircraft Internal Time Division Multiplex Data Bus, MIL-STD-1553 (USAF), Aug. 30, 1973 (29 pgs.). |
Instruction and Parts Manual, Machine type: GCB 1000 SPLIT, May 23, 2002, 80 pages, Geesink Norba Group. |
Instruction and Parts Manual, Machine type: GPM IIe, Jul. 10, 2002, 74 pages, Geesink Norba Group. |
Instruction Manual for the Training AS-i bus, Aug. 2002, 31 pages, Version 3.0, Geesink Norba Group. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150033962 A1 | Feb 2015 | US |