We, Karsten Buhr, a citizen of Germany, residing at Willroth, Germany, Stefan Abresch, a citizen of Germany, residing at Dierdorf, Germany, Thomas Lehnert, a citizen of Germany, residing at Oberraden, Germany, Guenter Haehn, a citizen of Germany, residing at Koenigswinter, Germany, and Cyrus Barimani, a citizen of Germany, residing at Koenigswinter, Germany have invented a new and useful “Ejector Unit For A Road Milling Machine Or The Like”. This application claims priority from German Patent Applications No. 10 2009 014 730.6-25 and No. 10 2009 014 729.2-25, both filed Mar. 25, 2009.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to an ejector unit, in particular for a road milling machine, having an ejector that comprises a conveying surface.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Road milling machines usually comprise a milling tube on whose surface are mounted a plurality of bit holders. The bit holders are usually part of a bit holder changing system that also encompasses a base part. The base part is welded onto the surface of the milling tube, and replaceably receives the bit holders. The bit holder serves for mounting of a cutting bit, usually a round-shaft cutting bit, as known e.g. from published German patent application DE 37 01 905 C1. The bit holders are arranged on the surface of the milling tube so as to yield spiral-shaped helices. The helices proceed from the edge region of the milling tube and rotate toward the center of the milling tube.
The respective helices that proceed from the oppositely located edge regions therefore meet at the center of the milling tube. One or more ejectors are also then arranged in this region. The helices convey to the ejectors the material removed by the cutting bits. The ejectors then transport it out of the working region of the milling tube.
The ejectors are subject to severe abrasive attack, and must therefore be regularly checked and replaced. For this, the ejector welded onto the milling tube must be detached and a new one welded on. Attention must be paid to the exact positioning and alignment of the ejector in order to achieve ideal discharge performance. This replacement work in the confined working area of the milling tube is laborious.
It is an object of the invention to make available an improved ejector unit and ejector that enable simple machine maintenance.
1. The Ejector Unit
The ejector unit includes an ejector replaceably mountable on a carrying part. This results in a tool system in which the ejector can be easily and quickly replaced in the event of damage or wear. Work is thereby considerably simplified, and machine downtimes can be considerably reduced.
According to a preferred variant embodiment of the invention, provision can be made that the ejector is mountable on the carrier in at least two different operating positions.
The ejectors can be used in one operating position until the wear limit is reached. The ejector is then brought into the next operating position and can then be used further. This results in a service life for the ejector that is considerably extended as compared with usual ejectors.
Provision can be made in this context that in order to change the operating positions, the ejector is installed having been rotated 180 degrees. What is exploited here is the recognition that the ejector wears substantially on its region facing away from the milling tube. Once the wear state has been reached there, the ejector is detached and is reinstalled having been rotated 180 degrees. The ejector service life can thereby be considerably extended, ideally in fact doubled. In order to lose as little time as possible when changing the operating positions of the ejector, and to make installation unequivocal, provision can be made that the ejector and the holder form a mechanical interface that enables reversible installation of the ejector.
Secure mounting of the ejector on the carrier part results from the fact that the ejector comprises a mounting receptacle and/or a mounting extension, and that the ejector is connected indirectly or directly to the carrier by means of one or more mounting elements.
One conceivable inventive alternative is such that the ejector is braced in planar fashion on a support surface of the carrier by means of a mounting side, that the ejector comprises a securing extension and/or a securing receptacle, and that the securing extension engages into a securing receptacle of the carrier and/or a securing extension of the carrier engages into the securing receptacle of the ejector. The mutually interengaging connection of the securing extension and securing receptacle creates a positively engaged connection through which processing forces can be dissipated in load-optimized fashion. This becomes possible in particular when provision is made that the positively engaged connection impedes or blocks any offset of the ejector with respect to the carrier transversely to the feed direction.
In the context of the ejector unit according to the present invention, provision can be made that the carrier comprises a mounting foot onto which is shaped a support part, and that the mounting foot comprises a mounting surface extending substantially in the feed direction. By means of the mounting surface, the carrier can be positioned correctly on the milling tube and mounted thereon, in particular welded on.
The carrier can be produced in simple fashion as an economical component.
If provision is made that the mounting foot is widened with respect to the support part in or oppositely to the feed direction, a load-optimized geometry then results. The transition region between the support part and the mounting foot is exposed to large bending stresses in the tool insert. Widening decreases the material stresses at that point.
According to a preferred variant embodiment of the invention, provision can be made that the ejector comprises a conveying surface that is arranged substantially transversely to the feed direction of the ejector unit, and is embodied in hollowed fashion, in particular recessed in scoop-like fashion, at least locally in a direction opposite to the tool feed direction. This hollowed conformation enables a geometry that improves the discharge rate.
If provision is made that one or more depressions are introduced into the conveying surface, material removed during tool use can become deposited in the depressions. A “natural” wear protection layer forms there.
According a variant of the invention, provision can be made that at least one screw receptacle is used as a mounting receptacle, and that the screw receptacle opens, toward the front side of the ejector, into a screw head receptacle in which a screw head of a mounting screw is at least locally nonrotatably receivable. Rapid and problem-free ejector replacement is possible with the screw connections. Countersunk or partly countersunk reception of the screw head prevents abrasive attack on the countersunk head region. In addition, loosening of the screw at this point is prevented.
If the conformation of the ejector is such that one or more shaped-on stiffening ribs are arranged on the rear side facing away from the conveying surface, a sufficiently rigid ejector can then be designed with little material outlay.
A preferred variant of the invention is such that the mounting side comprises a convex mounting portion for contact against a concave receiving portion of a carrier. This results in a surface connection between the carrier and the ejector through which processing forces can be reliably dissipated even in the event of asymmetrical force application to the conveying surface.
If provision is made that the carrier holds the ejector in such a way that the conveying surface extends with a slight inclination with respect to the feed direction, the discharge performance can then be optimized. It has been shown that particularly good performance is achieved with an inclination setting in an angle range of +/−20 degrees. Surprisingly, an optimum is obtained at a negative inclination angle, specifically at an inclination of 5 to 15 degrees opposite to the feed direction.
An additional improvement in ejector service life is achieved by the fact that at least one wear protection element, made of a material more wear-resistant than the conveying surface, is arranged in the region of the conveying surface; provision can be made in particular that the wear protection element is constituted by a hard-material element or by a hardfacing.
2. The Ejector
The ejector comprises a mounting side, facing away from its conveying surface, having a support surface. With this mounting side, the ejector can be placed onto a component mounted on the milling tube, for example onto a carrying part welded thereon. By way of the support surface of the carrying part, the loads occurring during tool use are reliably dissipated at least in part. The ejector is equipped with a mounting receptacle or mounting extension, so that it is replaceably mountable. In this fashion it can easily be changed in the event of damage or wear.
According to a preferred variant embodiment of the invention, provision can be made that the conveying surface of the ejector is arranged transversely to the feed direction of the ejector unit, and is at least locally embodied in concave fashion or is assembled, in the hollowed region, from line segments and/or curve segments. The concave or hollowed conformation enables a scoop-like geometry that improves the discharge rate.
To allow the ejector to be reliably braced on a carrying part, provision can be made that at least one protruding securing extension, or a recessed securing receptacle, is arranged on the side facing away from the conveying surface. Transverse forces that occur can then be transferred, in particular, in positively engaged fashion from the ejector into the carrying part. This is possible in particular when provision is made that by means of the at least one securing extension or the at least one securing receptacle, any displacement of the ejector in a plane transverse to the feed direction can be limited in positively engaged fashion.
Provision can be made according to the present invention that the screw receptacle is guided through the securing extension or securing receptacle. The carrying part is then utilized for a sufficient clamping length of the mounting screw.
A preferred configuration of the invention is such that the mounting side is embodied in such a way that the ejector is installable in different operating positions. The ejector can, in particular, be embodied in mirror-symmetrical fashion, or can be embodied in the region of a mounting side in such a way that it enables installation reversibly in two different operating positions. Also conceivable is an ejector that enables three or four different operating positions.
This is based on the recognition that the ejector becomes worn substantially on its region facing away from the milling tube. Once the worn state is achieved there, the ejector is removed and put back on having been rotated, for example, 180 degrees.
A preferred configuration of the invention is such that the mounting side comprises a convex or crowned or spherical mounting portion for contact against a concave or hollowed receiving portion of a carrier. This connection creates a large connecting surface that ensures good energy transfer even when the conveying surface is asymmetrically loaded. A further improvement in service life is achieved by the fact that at least one wear protection element, made of a material more wear-resistant than the conveying surface, is arranged in the region of the conveying surface. In this context, provision can be made in particular that the wear protection element is constituted by a hard-material element, for example carbide or ceramic, or by an applied coating, for example a hardfacing.
The invention will be further explained below with reference to an exemplifying embodiment depicted in the drawings, in which:
The transport helices meet in pairs in the region of the milling tube center. As is evident from
Firstly the design of carrying part 30 will be explained with reference to
Ejector 20 will be explained below with reference to
Said surface is equipped with recesses 21.1, 22. Located between recesses 21.1 are ribs that are at an angle to the vertical and are thus inclined toward the center of the ejector. The recesses receive removed material during operational use, thus forming a “natural” wear protector. A particularly good conveying rate is furthermore achieved by the fact that conveying surface 21 is embodied in concave, and thus scoop-shaped, fashion. Recess 22 comprises two oblique surfaces 22.1 that are at an angle to conveying surface 21 and assist the conveying action.
Located between the two recesses 22 is a thickened extension 23 that receives two screw receptacles 29 embodied as through holes. Screw receptacles 29 transition on the front side into hexagonal screw head receptacles 29.1.
As is further evident from
In order to mount ejector 20, it is placed with its rear side onto support surface 37 of carrier 30. Securing extensions 26.1, 26.2 then engage into the corresponding receptacles 37.1, 37.2. This results in a crosswise splining that prevents any displacement of ejector 20 with respect to carrier 30 in the axial and radial direction of milling tube 10. By way of this splined connection, large portions of the forces occurring during tool use can be dissipated.
Screw receptacles 29, 36.1 of ejector 20 and of carrier 30 are in alignment, so that mounting screws 24 (see
It is chiefly the radially projecting region of ejector 20 that wears during tool use. As is evident from
Mounting screws 24 can be passed through the screw receptacles, and nuts 28 can be threaded onto their threaded studs. Ejector 20 is thereby fixedly braced against a support surface 37 of carrier 30. As is evident from the drawings, ejector 20 is equipped in the region of mounting side 25 with cutouts 20.2. Upper cutout 20.2 receives the heads of mounting screws 24 and thus protects them, behind conveying surface 21, from the abrasive attack of the removed material. Lower cutout 20.2 extends in skirt fashion over carrier 30 and protects it there. Ejector 20 is symmetrical with respect to the central transverse axis, and can therefore be mounted reversibly in two operating positions, rotated 180 degrees, on carrier 30.
The ejector 20 seen in perspective in
As best seen in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 014 729 | Mar 2009 | DE | national |
10 2009 014 730 | Mar 2009 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
893749 | Nichols | Jul 1908 | A |
1403013 | Cornwall | Jan 1922 | A |
1894410 | Mattice | Jan 1933 | A |
2015581 | Armour | Sep 1935 | A |
3412491 | Raabe et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3576082 | Lowrey | Apr 1971 | A |
4477989 | Vachon | Oct 1984 | A |
4612715 | Cartner | Sep 1986 | A |
4697850 | Tuneblom | Oct 1987 | A |
4818027 | Simon | Apr 1989 | A |
4886009 | Gondar et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4969279 | Mantingh | Nov 1990 | A |
5101583 | Scordilis | Apr 1992 | A |
5120112 | Kincaid | Jun 1992 | A |
5315770 | Campbell | May 1994 | A |
5333938 | Gale | Aug 1994 | A |
6481654 | Balvanz et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6619756 | Holl et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
7004413 | Langlois | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7144192 | Holl et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7293729 | Ragnarsson | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7401862 | Holl et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7784875 | Holl et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
D624940 | Buhr et al. | Oct 2010 | S |
D624941 | Buhr et al. | Oct 2010 | S |
D624942 | Buhr et al. | Oct 2010 | S |
D628602 | Buhr et al. | Dec 2010 | S |
D632703 | Buhr et al. | Feb 2011 | S |
8246270 | Berning et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8469456 | Buhr | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8807867 | Berning et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
9284698 | Buhr | Mar 2016 | B2 |
20030116665 | Ragnarsson | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20050098331 | Edwards | May 2005 | A1 |
20080283257 | Edwards | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20110296687 | Hebuterne et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20150137577 | Berning et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
400452 | Jan 1996 | AT |
1659341 | Aug 2005 | CN |
101091037 | Dec 2007 | CN |
201901837 | Jul 2011 | CN |
2316406 | Oct 1974 | DE |
3708520 | Jul 1988 | DE |
3701905 | Sep 1988 | DE |
3911947 | Feb 1990 | DE |
0096585 | Dec 1983 | EP |
1473412 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1936034 | Jun 2008 | EP |
51-48819 | Jul 1949 | JP |
55-5758 | Aug 1981 | JP |
3-47708 | Feb 1991 | JP |
4134517 | Dec 1992 | JP |
3019721 | Oct 1995 | JP |
8003919 | Jan 1996 | JP |
3024168 | Feb 1996 | JP |
8165610 | Jun 1996 | JP |
2553730 | Jul 1997 | JP |
20013329 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2004278268 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2007326018 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2055184 | Feb 1996 | RU |
2332538 | Aug 2008 | RU |
Entry |
---|
Form PCT/ISA/210: International Search Report in corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2010/052562, dated Jun. 21, 2010, 2 pp. (not prior art). |
Form PCT/ISA/237: Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2010/052562, dated Jun. 21, 2010, 5 pp. (not prior art). |
Form PCT/IB/373: International Preliminary Report on Patentability in corresponding International Application No. PCT/EP2010/052562, dated Sep. 27, 2011, 6 pp. (not prior art). |
Machine-generated English translation of European Patent Office Opposition Procedure in relation to EP Patent No. EP2411582 dated Mar. 22, 2017, 19 pp. (not prior art). |
Bundle of refrences D1-D8 as attached to EPO Opposition dated Mar. 22, 2017, 86 pp. (The individual refrences have also been seperately listed on this or previous Information Disclosure Statement forms.). |
India Examination Report in Indian Application No. 6517/DELNP/2011 dated Mar. 27, 2017, 7 pp. (not prior art). |
Machine-generated English translation of Japanese Patent Publication No. JP 08-003919 A, to Tamu Tec:KK, date of publication Jan. 9, 1996, 7 pp. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160289903 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13921422 | Jun 2013 | US |
Child | 15064947 | US | |
Parent | 12728635 | Mar 2010 | US |
Child | 13921422 | US |