The present disclosure relates to refrigeration. More particularly, it relates to ejector refrigeration systems.
Earlier proposals for ejector refrigeration systems are found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,836,318 and 3,277,660.
In the normal mode of operation, gaseous refrigerant is drawn by the compressor 22 through the suction line 56 and inlet 24 and compressed and discharged from the discharge port 26 into the discharge line 28. In the heat rejection heat exchanger, the refrigerant loses/rejects heat to a heat transfer fluid (e.g., fan-forced air or water or other fluid). Cooled refrigerant exits the heat rejection heat exchanger via the outlet 34 and enters the ejector primary inlet 40 via the line 36.
The exemplary ejector 38 (
Use of an ejector serves to recover pressure/work. Work recovered from the expansion process is used to compress the gaseous refrigerant prior to entering the compressor. Accordingly, the pressure ratio of the compressor (and thus the power consumption) may be reduced for a given desired evaporator pressure. The quality of refrigerant entering the evaporator may also be reduced. Thus, the refrigeration effect per unit mass flow may be increased (relative to the non-ejector system). The distribution of fluid entering the evaporator is improved (thereby improving evaporator performance). Because the evaporator does not directly feed the compressor, the evaporator is not required to produce superheated refrigerant outflow. The use of an ejector cycle may thus allow reduction or elimination of the superheated zone of the evaporator. This may allow the evaporator to operate in a two-phase state which provides a higher heat transfer performance (e.g., facilitating reduction in the evaporator size for a given capability).
The exemplary ejector may be a fixed geometry ejector or may be a controllable ejector.
One aspect of the disclosure involves an ejector having a primary inlet, a secondary inlet, and an outlet. A primary flowpath extends from the primary inlet to the outlet. A secondary flowpath extends from the secondary inlet to the outlet. A mixer convergent section is downstream of the secondary inlet. A motive nozzle surrounds the primary flowpath upstream of a junction with the secondary flowpath. The motive nozzle has an exit. The nozzle includes means for introducing swirl to the motive flow.
In various implementations, there may be only a single motive nozzle. The motive nozzle may be coaxial with a central longitudinal axis of the ejector. The means may introduce swirl upstream of the junction. The means may be inside the motive nozzle. The means may comprise vanes. A needle may be mounted for reciprocal movement along the primary flowpath between a first position and a second position. A needle actuator may be coupled to the needle to drive the movement of the needle relative to the motive nozzle.
Other aspects of the disclosure involve a refrigeration system having a compressor, a heat rejection heat exchanger coupled to the compressor to receive refrigerant compressed by the compressor, a heat absorption heat exchanger, a separator, and such an ejector. An inlet of the separator may be coupled to the outlet of the ejector to receive refrigerant from the ejector.
The details of one or more embodiments are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
Like reference numbers and designations in the various drawings indicate like elements.
The ejector 200 comprises means for imparting swirl to the motive flow. Exemplary means is, therefore, located along the primary flowpath upstream of the motive nozzle exit. More particularly, in the
The motive (liquid) flow swirl enhances penetration and mixing of the suction (gas) phase flow. If a liquid core is rotating sufficiently fast within a gas core (which may be rotating or non-rotating), the liquid has a tendency to be moved outward by centrifugal force because the initial situation is hydrodynamically unstable. By such mixing, ejector efficiency, which measures the pressure rise relative to the entrainment ratio, can be increased.
For a given inlet swirl angle (the tangent of which is the ratio of circumferential to axial velocity components), the swirl angle increases from the inlet to the throat and then decreases to the nozzle exit. If the inlet-to-throat diameter ratio is larger than the exit-to-throat diameter ratio, there is more swirl at the nozzle exit. It may be impractical to place a swirler in the supersonic-flow portion of the nozzle (e.g., the portion of the motive nozzle downstream of the throat, or minimum area location) because the swirler will generate shocks and possibly choke the flow, in either case increasing the exit pressure. It is generally desirable to have the nozzle flow over-expanded; the nozzle exit pressure is then less than the local static pressure of the suction flow.
The ejectors and associated vapor compression systems may be fabricated from conventional materials and components using conventional techniques appropriate for the particular intended uses. Control may also be via conventional methods. Although the exemplary ejectors are shown omitting a control needle, such a needle and actuator may, however, be added.
In the exemplary ejector, the motive and suction flows are arranged in the typical fashion, with the motive flow nozzle surrounded by the suction flow. The motive flow density is generally higher than that of the suction flow. When swirl is imparted to the motive fluid in a manner, such as described above, and the motive and suction flows are then allowed to interact (mix), centrifugal force tends to displace outward the rotating, higher-density motive flow into the lower-density suction flow, thereby enhancing mixing and increasing ejector performance (pressure rise). The situation is termed fluid dynamically, or hydrodynamically, unstable because the rotating, higher-density fluid is moved by the swirl-induced centrifugal force from the center of the mixing section toward the outer region, displacing inward the lower density suction flow, thereby creating a hydrodynamically stable configuration. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,378,681 (the '681 patent), swirl is imparted to the suction flow. In the '681 patent, the performance enhancing mechanism is evidently the longer contact time between the two flows increasing shear-driven mixing. The fluid particles at the interface of the two flows will follow a spiral path that is longer than the axial distance from the point where the two flows first interact to the point when they are sufficiently mixed.
Although an embodiment is described above in detail, such description is not intended for limiting the scope of the present disclosure. It will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. For example, when implemented in the remanufacturing an existing system or the reengineering of an existing system configuration, details of the existing configuration may influence or dictate details of any particular implementation. Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
Benefit is claimed of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 61/495,577, filed Jun. 10, 2011, and entitled “Ejector with Motive Flow Swirl”, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety as if set forth at length.
The invention was made with US Government support under contract W909MY-10-C-0005 awarded by the US Army. The US Government has certain rights in the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/032910 | 4/10/2012 | WO | 00 | 9/6/2013 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2013/002872 | 1/3/2013 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1369688 | Mayer | Feb 1921 | A |
1836318 | Gay | Dec 1931 | A |
3277660 | Kemper et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
4378681 | Modisette | Apr 1983 | A |
5133194 | Army, Jr. et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5230656 | Paterson et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5363699 | McCall | Nov 1994 | A |
5832744 | Dorste et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6210123 | Wittrisch | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6343750 | Engel | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6578777 | Bui | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6638055 | Carroni | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6854260 | Anderson | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6931887 | Ogata et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6935578 | Shibata | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7832653 | Yukimoto | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20010025499 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20050188719 | Sugiura et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20080000263 | Oomura et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080209914 | De Wergifosse et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20100147021 | Betting et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100175381 | Wilbraham | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100175422 | Yamada et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100276517 | Alansary | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110030390 | Charamko et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20120228405 | Buelow | Sep 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1460824 | Dec 2003 | CN |
1527007 | Sep 2004 | CN |
101532760 | Sep 2009 | CN |
575024 | Jan 1946 | GB |
10246500 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11257299 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2008202812 | Sep 2008 | JP |
2008232458 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2010210111 | Sep 2010 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Yamada et al., Fuel Injection Valve, Dec. 11, 1996., PAJ, JP 08-296531, all. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2012/032910, dated Dec. 21, 2012. |
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280028365.4, dated Feb. 3, 2015. |
Chinese Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 201280028365.4, dated Sep. 21, 2015. |
European Office Action dated Jun. 14, 2017 for European Patent Application No. 12783379.6. |
European Office Action dated May 8, 2019 for European Patent Application No. 12783379.6. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140083121 A1 | Mar 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61495577 | Jun 2011 | US |