Golf clubs and particularly the driver have been modified in recent years to have a so-called “spring effect.” The spring effect is such that the hitting surface (called “face”) is made to be less stiff and rigid than earlier designs. Upon head-ball impact near the face center, the face deflects within its elastic limit and it has been found that if this spring effect is optimized, the ball will travel some 5 to 15 yards farther than for previous designs. Hits that are somewhat off center do not fully realize this spring effect. As a result, in common terminology, this means the size of the “sweet spot” is undesirably small. A co-pending patent application Ser. No. 10/210,329, filed Aug. 1, 2002, shows that the rear part of the club head, called the “shell”, may be made to have much less stiffness than usual designs. The shell can thus combine with flexibility of the face so that this spring effect is also at least partly experienced by hits that are off center, meaning near the perimeter of the club face. The present invention describes an unusual mechanical design for the shell walls such that a metal shell can be made to have reduced stiffness to the desired degree. This is an important advantage because ordinary designs of metal shells having the desired stiffness would require corrugations or other features and would have more weight than can be tolerated. If made very long in the front-back dimension of the club head, a metal shell of conventional nature would be far too long for all known metals for the desired front-to-back stiffness.
The co-pending patent, Ser. No. 10/210,329, filed Aug. 1, 2002, describes a club head shell structure having acceptable weight and acceptable stiffness for hits away from the face center and particularly for hits near the perimeter of the face. One way this is achieved is by use of plastic material for the shell such as polycarbonate. It has low enough stiffness in compression for the purpose without excessive weight. It describes other ways of providing the desired stiffness, not like the present invention.
Bridge trusses and similar trusses used as floor beams are similar to the present invention in that they can store potential energy mainly in uniform compression or tension in the elements. They differ in that whereas the present invention uses a multiplicity of related structures in the direction of the applied load, trusses have no reason to have 2 or more truss structures acting on each other in the direction of the applied load. Such trusses also are more concerned with achieving high rigidity with minimal deformation under load, whereas the present invention is strongly concerned with relatively large deformation. Such trusses are not made from one piece of material, whereas this is a preferred method of construction of the present invention.
A fundamental comparison with prior art springs in general is the storage of energy per unit weight of the structure. As applied to a material having uniform stress at the elastic limit, the elastic energy stored in a cubic inch of material is sometimes called the “modulus of resilience” or as the “unit resilience”. It varies in the structure as the local stress varies and may be measured as elastic energy stored per unit weight or per unit volume. Various references such as the 8th edition of Mark's “Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers” show resilience for beams in bending, coil springs, and numerous other structural configurations that have non-uniform stresses. For a given value of maximum stress, they store from as little as 1/12th to ½ as much energy per unit weight as the case of uniform tension or compression stresses (stresses that do not vary over the cross section considered). The preferred form of the present invention stores nearly as much energy as for uniform tension or compression. The result is substantial weight reduction for the novel spring over prior art.
The present invention is for a spring-like club head shell. It is primarily intended for “woods” and particularly for drivers. The preferred version causes the spring material to be primarily in either uniform compression or uniform tension. All ordinary springs have part of their structure that has little or no stress such as material near the center of the wire in coil springs. These parts add weight (more properly called “mass”) and contribute little to the strength and stiffness. The preferred version of the present invention has nearly all of its material contributing to the spring effect with relatively little of the material having low stress. Another way to state this advantage is that the novel design can store more potential energy (or elastic energy) per unit of weight than conventional springs, and particularly those for designs suitable for the shell of a driver. We refer to it as a “shell spring”
An unusual shape of a driver head is shown in
The shell spring deforms upon impact with a golf ball, particularly if impact is off center such as near the perimeter of the face. The spring effect at impact for off-center hits is much reduced in conventional designs of faces having the spring effect together with a relatively stiff shell, but the spring effect is reduced much less for such hits by the present invention. In addition, such impacts locally alter the slope of the face and cause errors in the direction of the shot for conventional spring effect club heads. The present invention improves the spring effect for such hits and also can reduce the change of slope of the face surface. These results are realized by allowing the edge of the face near such impacts to deform much more than is possible by conventional designs.
A usual preference is to make the face and shell of titanium alloy but various other materials can be used, such as plastics filled with strong fibers, and materials not yet developed. In
A detail of a preferred form of the shell spring 14 is shown fragmentarily in
For such compression loads the heavy lines in
A triangular unit 45 of the shell spring is called a “cell.” The cells are bounded by lines joining points p, q and r in
The intersections of axes of bars (or members) 43, 43A and 44 are shown as intersecting at points such as p, q, and r and this is preferred. The following discussion is primarily for this case. A less preferred arrangement is for such bars not intersecting at points that are common to all three axes of bars.
When compression loads 41 are applied, there is slight shortening of the compression members 43 and slight lengthening of the tensile members 44. There is little bending of the members. This allows good resilience per unit weight, nearly as good as the ideal case of uniform stresses (i.e. uniform throughout). The structural behavior is readily analyzed for tension and compression, though by rather cumbersome geometrical relations.
As an example of analysis, reasonable results had K=49 degrees, H=0.745 inch, L=1.3 inch, d=0.07 inch, x=0.067 inch, and y=0.077 inch. With loads approaching the yield strength of a strong titanium alloy (Ti-15-3-3-3) at 140,000 psi, the dimension “H” of each cell shown in
It was found that angle K could be as low as 10 degrees or less as indicated in
When angle K is near 80 degrees as shown in
An assembly of such cells as described in
The geometry of individual cells may be somewhat different.
Manufacture of webs or bars defining the cells described can be by casting. A relatively complicated mold is required. An alternate is to use a flat sheet of metal and cut the openings required for each cell by punching out the triangular cell openings or by cutting them out by means of such methods as water jet cutting or laser cutting. Such a sheet is then bent to the desired shape and joined by welding to the other parts.
There remains the consideration of how such spring cells may be attached to the face plate and to the rear structure. In the case of a club head, the apex of each cell where two webs or members join such as point q in
In the case where a more conventionally curved shell is desired, cell size may be varied so as to adapt to a shell shape that is not bent from a flat shape but has radii of curvature that may vary with direction from any point on the surface, such radii varying over various locations on the face plate perimeter.
It should be noted that during most of an impact of driver to ball, some elements are primarily in compression stress and are usually referred to as compression bars and some are primarily in tension stress and are usually referred to as tension bars. These compression and tension members have little bending stresses. There is normally a rebound at the end of the impact that reverses these compression and tensile stresses, even though they are defined for the impact as compression and tension members. Such tension and compression members are often referred to as “bars”. The forward direction refers to the direction from the rear plate toward the face plate.
Another alternate is to provide a portion of the shell that has no perforations such as indicated at part a in
This is avoided as shown in
Additional options are shown in dotted lines at numerals 111 and 112. The members 111 are similar in size and shape to the members 113 and alter the function of the shell spring only to a small extent. The members 112 are similar to members 100 and reduce dimension 107 required for members 100 and reduce the size of the openings 114 between columns, should that be desired.
In
The shell spring 156 includes a plurality of spring members or webs forming cells, in the preferred embodiment indicated at 158. These cells are formed by compression carrying members 160, joined by tension carrying members 162 that are labeled throughout. At the face end of the spring section 156, a plurality of columns 163 are formed as previously explained and are supported on tension carrying members 160A. The columns 163 are joined by an end member or rib 164 that provides for a line weld 166 to the edge of the face plate 154.
At the rear of the golf club head, the compression carrying members are supported on an integral rear strap 167 that is integral with and joins to support the compression carrying members at their junctions or cell apexes 168.
In
The shell structure comprising the shell spring 150 can be covered with a suitable elastic covering if desired, for appearance purposes, but provides a small or negligible structural stiffness between the face plate 154 and the rear plate 152 of a golf club head. In
Such head design provides the desired resilient characteristics that are useful for increasing the length of drives and the like in the game of golf.
As stated previously, the spring material can be preferably a titanium alloy, described previously. It is also possible that a plastic material could be used such as polycarbonate and still other materials may be used, such as may be developed in the future.
In the form of the invention shown in
The impact of the ball causes slight elongation of the tension members 162, and shortening of the compression members 160 and the individual deformations combine to provide the deformation of the shell at impact of the ball that in turn has a spring effect. Each of the members has a spring effect when loaded in tension or compression, and their spring effects combine to provide the stiffness of the shell that is desired. The tension members 160A, likewise are not required, but are in the preferred embodiment for joining the junctions of the compression members where the columns 163 carry the compression loading from the face plate to the spring effect sections.
Other shapes may be used to facilitate manufacture and joining of the cells to the face and to the rear structure, as discussed below for
It should be noted that the description of tension members and compression members above is for a ball impact loading on the face plate. If the shell has a tensile load rather than a compression load as described above, as will happen during a rebound after impact, the loading on the members or webs forming the shell would be reversed, and the compression members described would carry tension and the tension members described would be loaded in compression.
If all of the tension members described above were eliminated so the shell was diamond shaped rather than triangles, the shell would still be a spring because all of the compression members would be able to bend. The members forming the cells would have to be larger cross section for the same stiffness and the same strength as when the tension members are used, and the spring shell without the tension members forming the triangle cells would weigh at least twice as much.
An advantage of omitting the tension members (e.g. numerals 162 in
In a further extreme, half of the members 160 of
In
The loading from an impact on a face plate 154 is across corners of the spring cells 179. The corners of the spring cells adjacent the face plate 154 are connected to carry loads perpendicular to the plane of the face plate 154. The member 177 is parallel to the face plate, and is joined to a periphery of the face plate when it is formed with an open center to form the spring shell. The member 177 is connected to spring cell junctions or corners 178C with columns 182. A rear plate 152 is joined to the strap 180, which in turn is connected to junction corners 178C to transfer loads that are acting diagonally on the spring cells (which are diamond shaped as shown) to the rear plate 152.
Another extreme is illustrated in
Again, spring members 184 are primarily loaded in bending. The construction of
In the cases of
For best performance with least weight, the preferred embodiment is the full compliment of triangular elements as shown in
The structural members that bound open spacing elements are beams or bars. They are often call “bars” in the following.
At impact, the tension and compression bars that form the individual cells can be considered to be continuous diagonal bars extending from the face plate to the rear plate, with the first bars 43, for example, extending diagonally in a first direction and being spaced apart, and second bars 43A extending in an opposite diagonal direction with the bars joined at their intersection points. When bars 43 and 43A are in compression, they cause tension in bars 44. Together, they form the triangular spring cells.
Likewise, the spring bars shown in the other forms of the invention, such as a first set of the bars 160, are arranged in two different diagonal directions to each other and can be considered to extend from the junction with the face plate to the rear plate. The first set of diagonal bars 160 is joined to the second set of bars 160 at the intersections to form their spring cells. When bars 160 are in compression they cause tension in bars 162. This is also shown more clearly in
It was mentioned above that the central body b could be covered, and a somewhat flexible material would be used. A thin layer of polyurethane having a hardness rating of about 75D Shore hardness is suitable. Such a cover layer or coat adds little to the strength and stiffness of the structure, or weight. The cover could be made of other materials.
The spring shells that are shown can be made in flat layout, and then formed around an open space so that the bars that join the face plate will be attached adjacent to the periphery of the face plate, and the strap or bars that joins the rear plate will also be around the periphery of the rear plate. The spring shell can be in some other configuration. The spring shell could taper to a smaller size opening adjacent the rear plate, for example. The flat structure can be formed into the open center or tubular spring shell shape as shown in
A possible, closely related, optional configuration is the addition of tension and/or compression bars internal to the described shell and connecting to at least some of the bars that constitute the shell, thus modifying said “shell” to become a “rear structure”.
It should be noted that the bars 201 and 202 are at an angle with respect to a plane defined by the face plate and member 169. The locations 206 are at an intersection 170 adjacent the member 164 and thus the face plate, and the locations 204 are offset toward the rear strap 167.
An advantage for such configuration is that it can support the shell portion against buckling of the assembly of spring elements in the shell, and if desired, from buckling of individual bar elements in the shell structure. A disadvantage is more difficult manufacturing. In addition, it adds mass near to the center of gravity and thus reduces the moments of inertia when total head weight is not increased. This optional rear structure configuration is illustrated only in one form but can have many obvious variations.
Cross sectional shapes of the exterior of the rear structure as viewed in planes generally perpendicular to the front-rear direction may be round, elliptical or other shape such as the corresponding shapes of the rear portions of conventional club head designs. In addition, such cross sectional shapes may vary in both shape and size from front to rear.
All bar configurations described as having bending stresses or as tension and compression stresses are statements of close approximation. In fact, bars bounding triangular openings and are described as having tension and compression stresses deform and slight bending stresses are a result, which are generally relatively quite small but they do exist. Similarly, bars bounding openings that are of diamond shape are primarily stressed in bending, but do have small compressive stresses during impact. This is also true of bars bounding openings that are of trapezoidal shapes.
A further variation of possible value is to combine above-described structures. An example would be to have a portion of the structure having triangular openings with the structure having diamond-shaped openings and/or the structure having trapezoidal openings. The transition zones between two sets of such openings may vary. At least one process would be to provide a ring of significant strength and stiffness terminating one configuration on one side of such ring and beginning a different configuration on its other side. It is highly desirable for the final club head design to meet the standards of the United States Golf Association or other standards and a combination may be of value in adjusting the desired head weight, mass distribution, and compressive stiffness as may be required at present or in future standards.
Alternate configurations have similar elements, also called bars, that are primarily loaded in bending stress with relatively little compression stress. Combinations of bars having each kind of stress are also possible.
The features include:
1. Use of openings in the shell to permit greater deformation when loaded in compression during impact, with a minimum weight.
2. In the preferred embodiment, such openings consisting of triangular openings in the shell bounded by bars such as to cause such bars (also called “members”) to be primarily loaded in reasonably uniform compression and tensile stresses.
3. Such openings of feature 1 being a combination of triangular and quadrilateral shape (
4. Such openings in feature 1 being of quadrilateral shape (
5. Such openings of feature 1 being of nearly parallelogram shapes, the structural elements being loaded in bending with little pure compression or tension (
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application refers to and claims priority on U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/614,921, filed Sep. 30, 2004, the contents of which is incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60614921 | Sep 2004 | US |