Elastic, heat and moisture resistant bicomponent and biconstituent fibers

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7727627
  • Patent Number
    7,727,627
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 25, 2006
    18 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 1, 2010
    14 years ago
Abstract
Fibers having improved resistance to moisture at elevated temperatures comprise at least two elastic polymers, one polymer heat-settable and the other polymer heat-resistant, the heat-resistant polymer comprising at least a portion of the exterior surface of the fiber. The fibers typically have a bicomponent and/or a biconstituent core/sheath morphology. Typically, the core comprises an elastic thermoplastic urethane, and the sheath comprises a homogeneously branched polyolefin, preferably a homogeneously branched substantially linear ethylene polymer.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to elastic fibers. In one aspect, the invention relates to elastic, heat and moisture resistant fibers while in another aspect, the invention relates to elastic, heat and moisture resistant bicomponent or biconstituent fibers. In another aspect, the invention relates to such bicomponent and biconstituent fibers having a core/sheath construction. In yet another aspect, the invention relates to elastic, heat and moisture resistant bicomponent or biconstituent fibers in which the polymer that forms the sheath is at least partially cross-linked and the polymer that forms the core is heat-settable.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Materials with excellent stretchability and elasticity are needed to manufacture a variety of durable articles such as, for example, sport apparel and furniture upholstery. Stretchability and elasticity are performance attributes that function to effectuate a closely conforming fit to the body of the wearer or to the frame of the item. Maintenance of the conforming fit during repeated use, extensions and retractions at body temperatures is very desirable.


A material is typically characterized as elastic where it has a high percent elastic recovery (that is, a low percent permanent set) after application of a biasing force. Ideally, elastic materials are characterized by a combination of three important properties: a low percent permanent set, a low stress or load at strain, and a low percent stress or load relaxation. That is, elastic materials are characterized as having the following properties (1) a low stress or load requirement to stretch the material, (2) no or low relaxing of the stress or unloading once the material is stretched, and (3) complete or high recovery to original dimensions after the stretching, biasing or straining is discontinued.


Spandex is a segmented polyurethane elastic material known to exhibit nearly ideal elastic properties. However, not only is spandex cost prohibitive for many applications, it also exhibits poor resistance to moisture at elevated temperature. This, in turn, compromises the ability to dye fabrics made from it using conventional aqueous dying processes. For example, the thermosol dying process is an aqueous process that employs temperatures in excess of 200 C. Fabrics made from spandex cannot withstand the conditions of this process without a diminution in their elastic properties and as such, fabrics made from spandex must be processed at a lower temperature. This results in higher process costs and less uptake of dye into the fabric.


Elastic materials comprising polyolefins, e.g., polyethylene, polypropylene, polybutylene, etc., are known. These include, among others, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,425,393, 4,957,790, 5,272,236, 5,278,272, 5,324,576, 5,380,810, 5,472,775, 5,525,257, 5,858,885, 6,140,442 and 6,225,243 all of which are incorporated herein by reference. These disclosures notwithstanding, however, a present need exists for cost-effective elastic articles having good resistance to moisture at elevated temperatures.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One embodiment of this invention is a fiber having an exterior surface, the fiber comprising at least two elastic polymers, one polymer heat-settable and the other polymer heat-resistant, the heat-resistant polymer comprising at least a portion of the exterior surface.


Another embodiment of this invention is a bicomponent or biconstituent fiber having an exterior surface, the fiber comprising at least two elastic polymers, one polymer heat-settable and the other polymer heat-resistant, the heat-resistant polymer comprising at least a portion of the exterior surface. Preferably, the fiber has a core/sheath construction in which the core comprises the heat-settable polymer and the sheath comprises the heat-resistant polymer.


Another embodiment of this invention is a bicomponent or biconstituent fiber of a core/sheath construction in which the core comprises a thermoplastic urethane (also known as thermoplastic polyurethane) and the sheath comprises a homogeneously branched polyolefin. In a preferred embodiment, the homogeneously branched polyolefin is a homogeneously branched polyethylene, more preferably a homogeneously branched, substantially linear polyethylene.


Another embodiment of this invention is a bicomponent or biconstituent fiber of a core/sheath construction in which the polymer of the sheath has a gel content of greater than about 30 percent. The gel content of the polymer is a measure of the degree to which polymer is cross-linked, and a cross-linked polymer sheath contributes to maintaining the fiber structural integrity under temperatures in excess of the melting temperature of the sheath polymer.


Another embodiment of the invention is a fiber having an exterior surface, the fiber comprising (a) at least two elastic polymers, one polymer a heat-settable elastic polymer, e.g., thermoplastic urethane, and the other polymer a heat-resistant polyolefin, e.g., a polyethylene, the heat-resistant polymer comprising at least a portion of the exterior surface, and (b) a compatibilizer. Preferably, the compatibilizer is a functionalized ethylene polymer, more preferably an ethylene polymer containing at least one anhydride or acid group and even more preferably, an ethylene polymer in which at least some of the anhydride or acid group are reacted with an amine. The use of a compatibilizer promotes the adhesion between the core and sheath polymers of a bicomponent fiber, and the adhesion between the constituents of a biconstituent fiber.


Another embodiment of the invention is a fabricated article manufactured from the bicomponent and/or biconstituent fibers described above.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

The FIGURE shows a graph of Thermomechanical Analyzer (TMA) probe penetration data which demonstrates that one thermoplastic polyurethane has a higher softening temperature than another thermoplastic polyurethane.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Elastic Bicomponent and Biconstituent Fibers


As here used, “fiber” or “fibrous” means a particulate material in which the length to diameter ratio of such material is greater than about 10. Conversely, “nonfiber” or “nonfibrous” means a particulate material in which the length to diameter ratio is about 10 or less.


As here used, “elastic” or “elastomeric” describes a fiber or other structure, e.g., a film, that will recover at least about 50 percent of its stretched length after both the first pull and after the fourth pull to 100 percent strain (doubled the length). Elasticity can also be described by the “permanent set” of the fiber. Permanent set is measured by stretching a fiber to a certain point and subsequently releasing it to its original position, and then stretching it again. The percent elongation at which the fiber begins to pull a load is designated as the percent permanent set.


As here used, “heat-settable polymer” means a polymer that when formed into a fiber and (a) elongated 100% under tension, (b) exposed to a heat-setting temperature, and (c) cooled to room temperature, the fiber will exhibit dimensional stability, i.e., resistance to shrinkage, up to a temperature of 110 C.


As here used, “dimensional stability” means that the fiber will not substantially shrink upon exposure to an elevated temperature, e.g., that a fiber will shrink less that 30% of its length when exposed to a temperature of 110 C for 1 minute.


As here used, “heat-setting temperature” means a temperature at which an elastic fiber experiences a permanent increase in fiber length and a permanent decrease in fiber thickness after the fiber is elongated under tension. The permanent increase or decrease in denier means that the fiber does not return to its original length and thickness, although it may experience a partial recovery of one or both over time. The heat setting temperature is a temperature higher than any likely to be encountered in subsequent processing or use.


As here used, “bicomponent fiber” means a fiber comprising at least two components, i.e., of having at least two distinct polymeric regimes. For simplicity, the structure of a bicomponent fiber is typically referred to as a core/sheath structure. However, the structure of the fiber can have any one of a number of multi-component configurations, e.g., symmetrical core-sheath, asymmetrical core-sheath, side-by-side, pie sections, crescent moon and the like. The essential feature on each of these configurations is that at least part, preferably at least a major part, of the external surface of the fiber comprises the sheath portion of the fiber. FIGS. 1A-1F of U.S. Pat. No. 6,225,243 illustrate various core/sheath constructions.


As here used, “biconstituent fiber” means a fiber comprising an intimate blend of at least two polymer constituents. The construction of a biconstituent fiber is often referred to as “islands-in-the-sea”.


The bicomponent fibers used in the practice of this invention are elastic and, each component of the bicomponent fiber is elastic. Elastic bicomponent and biconstituent fibers are known, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,442.


In this invention, the core (component A) is a thermoplastic elastomeric polymer illustrative of which are diblock, triblock or multiblock elastomeric copolymers such as olefinic copolymers such as styrene-isoprene-styrene, styrene-butadiene-styrene, styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene or styrene-ethylene/propylene-styrene, such as those available from the Shell Chemical Company under the trade designation Kraton elastomeric resin; polyurethanes, such as those available from The Dow Chemical Company under the trade designation PELLATHANE polyurethanes or spandex available from E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Co. under the trade designation Lycra; polyamides, such as polyether block amides available from Elf AtoChem Company under the trade designation Pebax polyether block amide; and polyesters, such as those available from E. I. Du Pont de Nemours Co. under the trade designation Hytrel polyester. Thermoplastic urethanes (i.e., polyurethanes) are a preferred core polymer, particularly Pellethane polyurethanes.


The sheath (component B) is also elastomeric, and it comprises a homogeneously branched polyolefin, preferably a homogeneously branched ethylene polymer and more preferably a homogeneously branched, substantially linear ethylene polymer. These materials are well known. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,442 provides an excellent description of the preferred homogeneously branched, substantially linear ethylene polymers, and it includes many references to other patents and nonpatent literature that describe other homogeneously branched polyolefins.


The homogenously branched polyolefin has a density (as measured by ASTM D 792) of about 0.895 g/cm3 or less. More preferably, the density of the polyolefin is between about 0.85 and about 0.88 g/cm3. The melt index (MI as measured by ASTM D 1238 at 190 C) for the polyolefin is typically between about 1-50, preferably between about 2-30 and more preferably between about 3-10. For the homogeneously branched ethylene polymers used in the practice of this invention, the crystallinity is typically about 32% for a polymer with a density 0.895 g/cm3, about 21% for a polymer with a density of 0.880 g/cm3, and about 0% for a polymer with a density of 0.855 g/cm3.


The sheath component of the bicomponent or biconstituent fiber is cross-linked to provide it with heat-resistance. This component can be cross-linked using any conventional method, e.g., electromagnetic radiation such as UV (ultraviolet), visible light, IR (infrared), e-beam, silane-moisture curing and combinations of one or more of this cure techniques, and it is typically cross-linked to a gel content to more than 30, preferably more than 50 and more preferably more than 60, weight percent. The gel content is a measure of the degree of cross-linking of the polyolefin. While too much cross-linking, e.g., greater than about 80%, may result in a diminution of the mechanical properties of the fiber, the sheath polymer is cross-linked sufficiently to provide structural integrity to the fiber under moist and hot conditions (e.g., during heat setting and dying operations)


While the fibers of this invention are well suited for woven or knitted applications, e.g., fabrics made by interlacing and interlooping of linear assemblies of filaments and/or fibers, these fibers are also useful in the manufacture of nonwoven structures, e.g., fabrics made by bonding of web-like arrays of fibers and/or filaments. Typically, woven or knitted fabrics prepared with the elastic fibers of this invention comprise between about 1 and about 30, preferably between 3 and about 20, weight percent of the of the fabric. The remaining fibers of the fabric comprise one or more of any other fiber, e.g., a polyolefin (polypropylene, polybutylene, etc.), polyester, nylon, cotton, wool, silk and the like. Woven and knitted fabrics comprising the elastic fibers of this invention exhibit reduced shrinkage when exposed to the processing and maintenance conditions of typical manufacture and use, e.g., aqueous dying, washing and drying, ironing, etc.


Nonwoven fabrics can be formed by techniques known in the art including air-laiding, spun bonding, staple fiber carding, thermal bonding, and melt blown and spun lacing. Polymers useful for making such fibers include polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), nylon, polyolefins, silicas, polyurethanes, poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide), Lycra, carbon fibers, and natural polymers such as cellulose and polyamide (e.g., silk and wool). As here used, “fabric” means a manufactured assembly of fibers and/or yarns which has substantial area in relation to its thickness and sufficient mechanical strength to give the assembly inherent cohesion.


As here used, “staple fiber” means a natural fiber or a length cut from, for example, a manufactured filament. One principal use of these fibers is to form absorbent structures that act as a temporary reservoir for liquid and also as a conduit for liquid distribution. Staple fibers include natural and synthetic materials. Natural materials include cellulosic fibers and textile fibers such as cotton and rayon. Synthetic materials include nonabsorbent synthetic polymeric fibers, e.g. polyolefins, polyesters, polyacrylics, polyamides and polystyrenes. Nonabsorbent synthetic staple fibers are preferably crimped, i.e., fibers having a continuous wavy, curvy or jagged character along their length.


The formation of biconstituent fibers is enhanced with the use of a compatibilizer. As here used “compatibilizer” means a polymer that promotes the intimate blending and/or adhesion of the fiber constituent polymers. One preferred compatibilizer is a homogeneously branched ethylene polymer, preferably a homogeneously branched, substantially ethylene polymer grafted with a carbonyl-containing compound, e.g. maleic anhydride, that is reacted with an diamine. Maleic anhydride and other carbonyl-containing compounds grafted to a polyolefin are taught in U.S. Pat. No. 5,185,199. These compatibilizers greatly facilitate the extrusion of the core constituent into the sheath constituent. Compatibilizers useful in the practice of this invention are described in WO 01/36535.


The following examples are illustrative of certain of the embodiments of the invention described above. All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise noted.


SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS
Example 1

Bicomponent fibers of a core/sheath construction are prepared from (i) a sheath of Affinity EG8200 (a homogeneously branched, substantially linear ethylene/1-octene copolymer manufactured by The Dow Chemical Company with a density of 0.87 g/cc and an MI of 5), and (ii) a core of either Pellethane 2103-70A or Pellethane 2103-80A (thermoplastic urethanes based on MDI, PTMEG and butanediol, both manufactured by The Dow Chemical Company). The FIGURE shows by Thermomechanical Analyzer (TMA) probe penetration data that TPU-2103-80A has a higher softening temperature than TPU-2103-70A (the probe diameter was 1 mm and force of 1 Newton was applied; the sample was heated at 5 C/min from room temperature). The fibers are prepared using a conventional co-extrusion process such that the fiber sheath is 30 weight percent of the fiber, and the fiber core is 70 weight percent of the fiber. The fibers are crosslinked using e-beam at 19.2 megarad under nitrogen.


After crosslinking, the fibers are heat-set. The fibers are first drafted (i.e. elongated) under ambient conditions and taped to a Teflon substrate while under load. The fibers are then place in an oven at a pre-set temperature for a pre-determined time (while still under load), removed and allowed to cool to room temperature, released from the load and then measured. The amount of shrinkage from the elongated state is a measure of the heat set efficiency. Fibers that do not shrink after the release of the load are 100% heat set efficient. Fibers that return to their pre-load elongated length after the release of the load are 0% heat set efficient.


After the fiber is heat set, it is then placed within an oil bath held at a pre-set temperature for thirty seconds, removed, and measured again. The length of the fiber after treatment in the oil bath over the length of the fiber before treatment in the oil bath is a measure of the shrinkage of the heat set fiber.









TABLE 1







Effect of Heat Setting Temperature


EG8200/TPU-80A (30/70)














Shrink





Heat set
(Oil Bath)




Efficiency
temperature
Shrinkage



Draft
(%)
(° C.)
(%)

















T = 200° C.
1.5
100
90
3.8



t = 2 min
1.5
100
110
10.5




1.5
100
130
33.5




1.5
100
150
45.2



T = 230° C.
1.5
100
90
5.8



t = 2 min
1.5
100
110
13.0




1.5
100
130
40.2




1.5
100
150
45.1










As demonstrated by the data of Table 1, the heat set efficiency and the shrinkage at a given temperature is not materially impacted by the heat set temperature. The shrink temperature, however, has a material impact on the percent shrinkage with the greater shrinkage associated with the higher shrink temperature.









TABLE 2







Effect of Heat Setting Time EG8200/TPU-80A (30/70)














Shrink





Heat set
(Oil Bath)




Efficiency
Temperature
Shrinkage



Draft
(%)
(° C.)
(%)

















T = 200° C.
1.5
100
90
3.8



t = 2 min
1.5
100
110
10.5




1.5
100
130
33.5




1.5
100
150
45.2



T = 200° C.
1.5
100
90
3.8



t = 4 min
1.5
100
110
14.0




1.5
100
130
40.5




1.5
100
150
44.4



T = 200° C.
1.5
100
90
2.6



t = 10 min
1.5
100
110
10.3




1.5
100
130
37.9




1.5
100
150
41.0










The data of Table 2 demonstrates that the heat set efficiency and the shrinkage at a given temperature is not materially impacted by the heat set time.









TABLE 3







Effect of Composition














Shrink





Heat set
(Oil Bath)




efficiency
Temperature
Shrinkage



Draft
(%)
(° C.)
(%)

















EG8200/
1.5
97.3
110
28.7



TPU-70A
1.5
95.3
130
37.5



(30/70)
1.5
98.3
150
44.9




2.0
93.8
90
25.4




2.0
94.8
110
34.7




2.0
94.4
130
48.6




2.0
90.7
150
54.2



EG8200*
2.0
93.8
90
57.4




2.0
94.6
150
71.0







*Affinity fiber of 40 denier and crosslinked using e-beam at 22.4 megarad under nitrogen.






The data of Table 3 demonstrates that a fiber with an Affinity sheath and TPU core shrinks less than an Affinity fiber.









TABLE 4







Effect of Composition


(0.75 mm die)














Shrink





Heat set
(Oil Bath)




efficiency
Temperature
Shrinkage



Draft
(%)
° C.
(%)

















EG8200/
1.5
100
110
15.4



TPU-80A
1.5
100
130
24.2



(30/70)
1.5
100
150
38.4




2.0
100
90
6.6




2.0
100
110
18.7




2.0
100
130
38.7




2.0
100
150
49.7



EG8200*
2.0
93.8
90
57.4




2.0
94.6
150
71.0







*Affinity fiber of 40 denier and crosslinked using e-beam at 22.4 megarad under nitrogen.






The data of Table 4 demonstrates that a fiber with an Affinity sheath and with a different TPU core also shrinks less than an Affinity fiber.









TABLE 5







Effect of TPU
















Shrink






Heat set
(Oil Bath)





efficiency
Temperature
Shrinkage



Composition
Draft
(%)
° C.
(%)

















EG8200/
1.5
100.0
90
15.5



TPU-70A
1.5
97.3
110
28.7



(30/70)
1.5
95.3
130
37.5




1.5
98.3
150
44.9




2.0
93.8
90
25.4




2.0
94.8
110
34.7




2.0
94.4
130
48.6




2.0
90.7
150
54.2



EG8200/
1.5
100
90
2.3



TPU-80A
1.5
100
110
15.4



(30/70)
1.5
100
130
24.2




1.5
100
150
38.4




2.0
100
90
6.6




2.0
100
110
18.7




2.0
100
130
38.7




2.0
100
150
49.7










The data of Table 5 demonstrates that TPU-80A has lower shrinkage than TPU-70A, and TPU-70A has a lower softening point than TPU-80A. Typically, cores that have a higher softening point are desirable because they experience less shrinkage and this property is imparted to the fabrics from which they are made.









TABLE 6







Effect of Composition














Shrink





Heat set
(Oil Bath)
Shrinkage


Composition
Draft
Efficiency (%)
temperature (° C.)
(%)














TPU-80A
1.5
97
90
29.4


(30%) + Affinity
1.5
99
110
40.9


(70%)
1.5
98
130
53.5



1.5
100
150
57.7



2.0
95
90
37.8



2.0
95
110
57.5



2.0
95
130
66.5



2.0
91
150
67.6


TPU-80A
1.5
100
90
15.9


(50%) + Affinity
1.5
100
110
27.1


(50%)
1.5
97
130
47.2



1.5
100
150
49.0



2.0
96
90
18.8



2.0
98
110
34.1



2.0
94
130
58.1



2.0
97
150
56.6


TPU-80A
1.5
100
90
7.9


(70%) + Affinity
1.5
100
110
17.8


(30%)
1.5
100
130
41.7



1.5
100
150
44.8



2.0
100
90
15.0



2.0
100
110
19.4



2.0
100
130
51.0



2.0
99
150
59.8









The data of Table 6 demonstrates that the higher the weight percent of the TPU in the core, the lower the shrinkage.


Example 2

Biconstituent fibers are prepared from the blend of (i) a sheath of Affinity EG8200 (a homogeneously branched, substantially linear ethylene/1-octene copolymer manufactured by The Dow Chemical Company), (ii) a core of either Pellethane 2103-70A or Pellethane 2103-80A, and (iii) MAH-g-Affinity ethylene copolymer reacted with a diamine. The blends are first prepared using a twin-screw extruder, and then the fibers are prepared using a conventional spinning process. The fibers are crosslinked using e-beam at 19.2 megarad under nitrogen.









TABLE 7





Status of Fiber Spinning from Blends



















Blends without
Not extrudable
N/A



compatibilizer



Blends with
Spun
T-210-230 C.



compatibilizer

(Spinning Temperature)

















TABLE 8







Effect of TPU on Heat Shrinkage (30% TPU + 70%


Affinity + 10% Fusabond)














Shrink





Heat set
(Oil Bath)
Shrinkage


TPU
Draft
Efficiency (%)
temparature (° C.)
(%)














TPU-70A
1.5
97
90
36.3



1.5
94
110
42.2



1.5
97
130
47.3



1.5
96
150
48.3



2.0
90
90
47.5



2.0
94
110
51.8



2.0
89
130
58.6



2.0
92
150
59.6


TPU-80A
1.5
97
90
27.4



1.5
95
110
38.0



1.5
98
130
41.7



1.5
97
150
50.1



2.0
92
90
36.0



2.0
94
110
43.8



2.0
92
130
57.0



2.0
93
150
58.6


EG8200*
2.0
93.8
90
57.4



2.0
94.6
150
71.0





*Affiniity fiber of 40 denier and crosslinked using e-beam at 22.4 megarad under nitrogen.






The data of Table 8 demonstrates that the higher the softening temperature of the TPU core, the smaller the shrinkage of the fiber.









TABLE 9







Comparison of Elastic Recovery of Bicomponent with


Biconstituent fiber










Applied
Instantaneous Set (%)












Strain(%)
Biconstituent
Bicomponent
EG8200*
















50
6
6
6



75
8
11
9



100
13
14
13



150
27
35
29



200
50
69
56







*Affinity fiber of 40 denier and crosslinked using e-beam at 22.4 megarad under nitrogen.






The data of Table 9 demonstrates that the biconstituent and bicomponent fibers exhibited a similar elasticity recovery as did the Affinity fiber.


Although the invention has been described in detail by the preceding examples, the detail is for the purpose of illustration and is not to be construed as a limitation upon the invention. Many variations can be made upon the preceding examples without departing from the spirit and scope of the following claims.

Claims
  • 1. A fiber having an exterior surface, the fiber comprising at least two elastic polymers, one polymer heat-settable such that when formed into a fiber and (a) elongated 100 percent under tension, (b) exposed to a heat-setting temperature, and (c) cooled to room temperature, will resist shrinkage up to a temperature of 110° C., and the other polymer is crosslinked polyethylene crosslinked to have a gel-content of more than 30 wt % to provide heat-resistance, the crosslinked polyethylene comprising at least a portion of the exterior surface and wherein the fiber will recover at least 50 percent of the stretched length after both the first pull and the fourth pull to 100 percent strain.
  • 2. The fiber of claim 1 further comprising a compatibilizer.
  • 3. The fiber of claim 2 in which the compatibilizer is a functionalized ethylene polymer.
  • 4. The fiber of claim 3 in which the compatibilizer is an ethylene polymer containing at least one anhydride or acid group.
  • 5. The fiber of claim 4 in which the compatibilizer has been reacted with an amine.
  • 6. The fiber of claim 1 in which the polyethylene is a homogenously branched, substantially linear ethylene polymer.
  • 7. A woven or knitted fabric comprising the fiber of claim 1.
  • 8. A nonwoven fabric comprising the fiber of claim 1.
  • 9. A woven or knitted fabric comprising between 1 and 30 weight percent based on the weight of the fabric of the fiber of claim 1.
  • 10. A woven or knitted fabric comprising between 1 and 30 weight percent based on the weight of the fabric of the fiber of claim 1 in which the fabric exhibits reduced shrinkage, as compared to a fabric alike in all respects except for comprising said fiber, when exposed to moisture at an elevated temperature.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/195,232 filed Jul. 15, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,135,228, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/306,018, filed Jul. 17, 2001.

US Referenced Citations (23)
Number Name Date Kind
4425393 Benedyk et al. Jan 1984 A
4663221 Makimura et al. May 1987 A
4950541 Tabor et al. Aug 1990 A
4957790 Warren Sep 1990 A
5082899 Sawyer et al. Jan 1992 A
5108827 Gessner Apr 1992 A
5133917 Jezic et al. Jul 1992 A
5185199 Sawyer Feb 1993 A
5272236 Lai et al. Dec 1993 A
5278272 Lai et al. Jan 1994 A
5324576 Reed et al. Jun 1994 A
5380810 Lai et al. Jan 1995 A
5472775 Obijeski et al. Dec 1995 A
5525257 Kleinstuck et al. Jun 1996 A
5534335 Everhart et al. Jul 1996 A
5858885 Hamilton et al. Jan 1999 A
5922417 Singleton et al. Jul 1999 A
6140442 Knight et al. Oct 2000 A
6225243 Austin May 2001 B1
6436534 Knight et al. Aug 2002 B1
6500540 Langohr et al. Dec 2002 B1
6773810 Sen et al. Aug 2004 B2
7135228 Sen et al. Nov 2006 B2
Foreign Referenced Citations (10)
Number Date Country
0859073 Aug 1998 EP
60-45611 Mar 1985 JP
60045611 Mar 1985 JP
61-194221 Aug 1986 JP
61194221 Aug 1986 JP
4316609 Nov 1992 JP
9960060 Nov 1999 WO
WO-0029658 May 2000 WO
0136535 May 2001 WO
WO 0136535 May 2001 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20070020453 A1 Jan 2007 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60306018 Jul 2001 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10195232 Jul 2002 US
Child 11526498 US