The present application is a 35 U.S.C. § 371 National Phase conversion of PCT/EP2013/000112, filed Jun. 24, 2013, which claims benefit of Swiss patent application no. 1048/12, filed Jul. 5, 2012, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The PCT International Application was published in the English language.
The present invention relates to an elastic connecting rod for surgical treatment of the spine, the rod having different degrees of stiffness along its longitudinal axis according to the preamble of claim 1.
Elastic connecting rods are typically used in conjunction with pedicle screws for the dynamic stabilization of the spine. If such a rod can be provided with a section of higher stiffness, the possible indications can be substantially extended. Thus, a section of higher stiffness may be used for the fusion of vertebral bodies while a section of lower stiffness may be used for the elastic connection of a neighboring vertebral body.
Today, the “golden standard” in spinal surgery still consists in the fusion (stiffening) of pathologic vertebral bodies. However, fusions often lead to premature degeneration of the segments adjacent to the fusion. Therefore, attempts are being made to provide rods having different degrees of stiffness and to include neighboring segments in the surgical treatment.
The approaches of the prior art to solving this problem will be set forth below.
The invention according to patent application US 2008/0319486 discloses a connecting element having a variable stiffness along its longitudinal axis. The variable stiffness is limited to the sections between two anchoring elements and provides a different response to pressure only.
The invention according to EP 2 113 216 also provides different degrees of stiffness. The connection of the different materials is either achieved by interpenetration or by a butt joint. The material differences are limited to differences in hardness and in bending flexibility. Differences in longitudinal or transversal stiffness are not disclosed. The butt joints are designed for normal stresses exclusively.
The invention according to patent application US 2008/0177388 also connects different rod materials, but this is achieved according to the male/female principle, which is demanding with regard to the production technique.
The invention according to patent application US 2009/0248083 also provides sections of different stiffness, however with a varying core that is difficult to anchor particularly in the stiffer areas.
The invention according to patent application WO 97/32533 provides a varying stiffness due to a varying external diameter, thereby making the rod more difficult to anchor.
The invention according to patent application US 2008/0306536 aims to achieve a variable stiffness between vertebral bodies by connecting the connecting element to the bone screw with variable stiffness. This solution is space-consuming and may have unfavorable consequences for the patient.
The invention according to patent application WO 2007/038429 also allows achieving different degrees of stiffness due to a modular construction but, according to the claims, only in response to bending stresses and not to tensile and compression loads.
The invention according to patent application US 2005/0203513 also provides different degrees of stiffness in that for one part, the core inside a cylindrical wall varies or, for the other part, the stiffness of a connecting element is locally reduced by material removal. On one hand, this entails the difficulty of anchoring a core by means of a wall of a different kind, and on the other hand, the difficulty of sections of predetermined length, which in the case of multisegment treatments involves significant logistic complexity.
The invention according to patent application US 2007/0129729 also provides a stiff and an elastic rod portion whose connection is interpenetrating and is supported by a cable.
The invention according to patent application US 2006/0041259 provides a variable stiffness along its rod axis. The variation is achieved by a helical slot (or spiral slot) reflecting the mechanical principle of a spiral spring. The spring may also be filled with a core and such core may be secured to the spring by welding or bonding. The variation may further be achieved by assembling rods of different properties one behind the other. However, the patent application does not disclose any method of sequentially connecting one rod to the other. Nor does it disclose how the anchorage of the rod in a bone screw would interface with such a connection site.
The inventions according to the patent applications CH 702636 or US 2006/0095134 disclose only blunt connections (butt joint connections) or blunt transitions.
Thus it follows from the prior art that most connections are butt joints, at least peripherally, and thus extend in a plane parallel to the clamping plane in the screw head.
Accordingly, it is the object of the invention described hereinafter to provide a biocompatible plastic rod having at least two sections of different stiffness along its longitudinal axis.
This object is achieved in that rod segments having different degrees of stiffness are interconnected in a plane that is oblique to the longitudinal rod axis. The connection may be achieved by bonding or welding or by a combination of both. In the case of welding, especially heating techniques (e.g. plates or mirrors), motion techniques (e.g. vibration or ultrasonic welding), or a combination of both may be contemplated.
Such a rod of variable stiffness is defined in the claims. The claims define preferred embodiments. According to the claims, the plastic material may be a polycarbonate urethane.
In contrast to US 2006/0041259, the present invention discloses a connection of different rods along an inclined plane, in order to not only have normal loads across the connection site, i.e. perpendicular to the connection plane, but also shear loads. The present invention discloses rods with plain sections and connection areas extending over the entire cross section. The inclination angle of the inclined plane is determined in order to avoid an anchorage which clamps from two opposite sides across the connection plane.
Furthermore, it is avoided that a connecting plane coincides with a clamping plane and the connection, besides normal stresses, is also ensured by more suitable shear stresses.
The present invention is explained in more detail hereinafter by way of preferred examples with reference to drawings which merely illustrate exemplary embodiments and in particular do not show the maximum number of different consecutive degrees of stiffness.
The Figures schematically show:
In contrast,
Consequently, the disclosed invention offers multiple advantages, as explained below.
An oblique connection 13 with an angle of inclination α between 5° and 85°, preferably 45°, always represents a larger surface than a connection that is perpendicular to the rod axis 47. In this manner, tensions in the connection are reduced. Furthermore, shear stresses result, which are generally more suitable for connections than normal stresses i.e. stress perpendicular to the connecting plane.
If a clamping device comprises ridges 18 located in one and the same clamping plane and if these ridges apply in a connecting plane 8 that is orthogonal to the rod axis, they will penetrate into the connecting plane from both clamping sides. In the case of a bonded joint or a weld seam, a critical splitting force may result.
If a clamping device comprises ridges 18 located in one and the same clamping plane and if these ridges apply to an oblique connecting plane 13, only one ridge 18 may apply a load to the connection on one clamping side, and no force is exerted on other sections of the connection plane 13. Moreover, the clamping does not act in the oblique connecting plane and thus has no direct splitting or cleaving effect either.
This connection method allows connecting rod segments with large differences in longitudinal or transversal stiffness. To this end, the rod segments have to be dry. In order to allow the subsequent clinical application of rod segments of high stiffness, these have to be rehydrated after their connection and delivered in a preferably saturated condition.
The description of the examples enables the one skilled in the art to perceive modifications and alternations without leaving the scope of protection defined by the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1048/12 | Jul 2012 | CH | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CH2013/000112 | 6/24/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/005236 | 1/9/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5215246 | Thompson | Jun 1993 | A |
5217461 | Asher et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5593408 | Gayet et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
6099528 | Saurat | Aug 2000 | A |
6197015 | Wilson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
7815663 | Trieu | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8038818 | Murata | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8409396 | Bech | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8974497 | Cho et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20040002708 | Ritland | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050203513 | Jahng et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050261686 | Paul | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060009768 | Ritland | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060041259 | Paul et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060095134 | Trieu et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060142760 | McDonnell | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060242813 | Molz et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060247638 | Trieu et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070005063 | Bruneau et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070129729 | Petit et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070186990 | Serbousek | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070191841 | Justis et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070233073 | Wisnewski et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270819 | Justis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070270843 | Matthis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080086127 | Patterson | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080140133 | Allard et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080177388 | Patterson | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080221620 | Krause | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080262548 | Lange et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080306536 | Frigg et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080312694 | Peterman et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319486 | Hestad et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090240284 | Randol et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090248077 | Johns | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090248083 | Patterson et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270921 | Krause | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090270922 | Biedermann | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090287251 | Bae et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100042154 | Biedermann et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100114165 | Ely | May 2010 | A1 |
20100114167 | Wilcox | May 2010 | A1 |
20100126654 | Katayama | May 2010 | A1 |
20100217326 | Bowden et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100324600 | Biyani | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110029018 | Carlos | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110054535 | Gephart et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110106162 | Ballard et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110152936 | Gil et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110152937 | Trieu | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120065687 | Ballard et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120071928 | Jackson | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089188 | Jackson | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120112422 | Larsson | May 2012 | A1 |
20120290013 | Simonson | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130012997 | Hestad et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130079825 | Loke et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130103090 | Prevost | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110169 | Hynes et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130123855 | Clark | May 2013 | A1 |
20130158606 | Freudiger et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130211454 | Beger et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20140025116 | Wei | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140081333 | Jackson | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140257393 | Trieu et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150039034 | Frankel et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150080955 | Celmerowski et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150297265 | Arena | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150305779 | Montavon | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150313642 | Fessler | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20170105764 | Williams | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170135728 | Williams | May 2017 | A1 |
20190142469 | Williams | May 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
702 636 | Aug 2011 | CH |
702637 | Aug 2011 | CH |
702637 | Aug 2011 | CH |
703 000 | Oct 2011 | CH |
2 113 216 | Nov 2009 | EP |
WO 9732533 | Sep 1997 | WO |
WO 2007038429 | Apr 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Jan. 6, 2015 issued in corresponding International Patent Application No. PCT/CH2013/000112. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 6, 2013 issued in corresponding International patent application No. PCT/CH2013/000112. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150173799 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |