The subject invention relates to the art of alignment systems and, more particularly, to an elastically averaged alignment system, and even more particularly to an elastically averaged alignment system providing coarse to fine alignment of the components on which it is incorporated.
Currently, components, particularly vehicular components such as those found in automotive vehicles, which are to be mated together in a manufacturing process are mutually located with respect to each other by features that are oversized and/or undersized to provide spacing to freely move the components relative to one another to align them. One example includes 2-way and/or 4-way male alignment features, typically upstanding bosses, which are received into corresponding female alignment features, typically apertures in the form of holes or slots. There is a clearance between the male alignment features and their respective female alignment features which is predetermined to match anticipated size and positional variation tolerances of the male and female alignment features as a result of manufacturing (or fabrication) variances. As a result, significant positional variation can occur between the mated first and second components which may contribute to the presence of undesirably large variation in their alignment, particularly with regard to the gaps and spacing between them. In the case where these misaligned components are also part of another assembly, such misalignments can also affect the function and/or aesthetic appearance of the entire assembly. Regardless of whether such misalignment is limited to two components or an entire assembly, it can negatively affect function and result in a perception of poor quality.
In addition, it is desirable to ensure precise alignment of two components by providing a precise or fine positioning and alignment system or mechanism; however, it is often necessary, or at least desirable, to obtain a rough or coarse alignment of the components prior to proceeding with the precise alignment. Current two-way and four-way alignment features, such as those described above, do not provide coarse and fine alignment of the respective components on which they are incorporated. As a result, it is desirable to provide alignment systems that provide both coarse and fine alignment of the components on which they are incorporated.
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, an elastically averaged alignment system is disclosed. The alignment system includes a first alignment portion comprising an alignment member and a first plurality of elastically deformable alignment elements. The alignment system also includes a second alignment portion comprising an elastically deformable alignment member configured and disposed to be received by and deformably and matingly engaged with the alignment member and a second plurality of elastically deformable alignment elements configured and disposed to deformably and matingly engage the first plurality of deformable alignment elements, wherein the engagement of the alignment member and deformable member and first plurality of elastically deformable alignment elements and the second plurality of elastically deformable alignment elements elastically average a predetermined position of the second alignment portion relative to the first alignment portion.
In accordance with another exemplary embodiment, a method of fastening a first component to a second component includes aligning an alignment member provided on a first alignment portion attached to the first component with an elastically deformable alignment member provided on a second alignment portion attached to the second component. The method also includes engaging the alignment member with the elastically deformable alignment member to establish an elastically averaged first alignment of the first component relative to the second component, the engaging of the alignment member with the elastically deformable alignment member also providing engagement of one or more of a first plurality of elastically deformable alignment elements provided on the first alignment portion with one or more of a second plurality of elastically deformable alignment elements provided in the second alignment portion. The method further includes shifting the first alignment portion relative to the second alignment portion upon engagement and causing an elastic deformation of the elastically deformable alignment members. Still further, the method includes seating the first plurality of elastically deformable alignment elements against the second plurality of elastically deformable alignment elements to establish a second alignment of the first component relative to the second component and an elastically averaged predetermined position of the first component to the second component.
In accordance with yet another exemplary embodiment, a vehicle is disclosed. The vehicle includes a first component and a second component positioned and aligned in an elastically averaged predetermined position relative to the first component. The vehicle also includes an elastically averaged alignment system that establishes the predetermined position of the first component relative to the second component, the elastically averaged alignment system includes a first alignment portion comprising an alignment member and a first plurality of elastically deformable alignment elements disposed on the first body panel. The alignment system also includes a second alignment portion comprising an elastically deformable alignment member configured and disposed to be received by and deformably and matingly engaged with the alignment member and a second plurality of elastically deformable alignment elements configured and disposed to deformably and matingly engage with the first plurality of deformable alignment elements, wherein the engagement of the alignment member and deformable alignment member and the first plurality of elastically deformable alignment elements and the second plurality of elastically deformable alignment elements elastically average a position of the second alignment portion relative to the first alignment portion disposed on the second body panel.
The above features and advantages and other features and advantages of the invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Other features, advantages and details appear, by way of example only, in the following detailed description of embodiments, the detailed description referring to the drawings in which:
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure, its application or uses. For example, the embodiments shown comprise vehicle body panels but the alignment system may be used with any suitable components to provide elastic averaging for precision location and alignment of all manner of mating components and component applications, including many industrial, consumer product (e.g., consumer electronics, various appliances and the like), transportation, energy and aerospace applications, and particularly including many other types of vehicular components and applications, such as various other interior, exterior and under hood vehicular components and applications. It should be understood that throughout the drawings, corresponding reference numerals indicate like or corresponding parts and features.
As used herein, the term “elastically deformable” refers to components, or portions of components, including component features, comprising materials having a generally elastic deformation characteristic, wherein the material is configured to undergo a resiliently reversible change in its shape, size, or both, in response to application of a force. The force causing the resiliently reversible or elastic deformation of the material may include a tensile, compressive, shear, bending or torsional force, or various combinations of these forces. The elastically deformable materials may exhibit linear elastic deformation, for example that described according to Hooke's law, or non-linear elastic deformation.
Elastic averaging provides elastic deformation of the interface(s) between mated components, wherein the average deformation provides a precise alignment, the manufacturing positional variance being minimized to Xmin, defined by Xmin=X/√N, wherein X is the manufacturing positional variance of the locating features of the mated components and N is the number of features inserted. To obtain elastic averaging, an elastically deformable component is configured to have at least one feature and its contact surface(s) that is over-constrained and provides an interference fit with a mating feature of another component and its contact surface(s). The over-constrained condition and interference fit resiliently reversibly (elastically) deforms at least one of the at least one feature or the mating feature, or both features. The resiliently reversible nature of these features of the components allows repeatable insertion and withdrawal of the components that facilitates their assembly and disassembly. Positional variance of the components may result in varying forces being applied over regions of the contact surfaces that are over-constrained and engaged during insertion of the component in an interference condition. It is to be appreciated that a single inserted component may be elastically averaged with respect to a length of the perimeter of the component. The principles of elastic averaging are described in detail in certain commonly owned, co-pending U.S. Patent Applications, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference below in their entirety. The embodiments disclosed herein provide the ability to convert an existing component that is not compatible with the elastic averaging principles described herein to an assembly that does facilitate elastic averaging and the benefits associated therewith.
A vehicle is indicated generally at 2 in
Referring to
Referring to
Second alignment portion 36 includes a body 76 having a first surface 78 and an opposing second surface 79. Second alignment portion 36 also includes a plurality of spaced apart elastically deformable alignment members 82-84. In one embodiment, elastically deformable alignment member 82 is shown in the form of an elastically deformable tube member 85 configured and disposed to be received and elastically deformed by hollow interior 51 of receiver 47. That is, the diameter of the deformable tube member 85 is greater than the width of the hollow interior 51 of the receiver 47 such that upon insertion of the tube member 85 into and through the flared opening 55, the width of the hollow interior 51 of receiver 47 interferes with the tube member 85 and causes it to be elastically deformed. Tube member 85 extends from a first end section 88 that projects from second surface 79 to a second end section 89 through a hollow intermediate section 91 having a generally circular cross-section. Tube member 85 may be guided into receiver 47 by flared opening 55 and the associated tapered sidewall of the receiver 47 acting as a lead-in surface. Similarly, elastically deformable alignment members 83, 84 take the form of corresponding tube members 92 and 93 that are received by receivers 52 and 53 respectively in the same manner as tube member 85. The alignment members 44-46 may be configured for engagement with elastically deformable alignment members 82-84 in the manner set forth in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/187,675 filed on Jul. 21, 2011 and Ser. No. 13/571,030 filed on Aug. 9, 2012, which are assigned to the same assignee as this application, and which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Second alignment portion 36 is further shown to include a plurality of second elastically deformable alignment elements indicated generally at 94. Second elastically deformable alignment elements 94 are shown in the form of elastically deformable tooth elements 95 including a first angled surface 96 and a second angled surface 98. In one embodiment, the deformable tooth elements 95 have their tips or vertices 97 and roots 99 that extend substantially transverse to the longitudinal axis 54,
In accordance with an exemplary embodiment, second alignment portion 36 is disposed on a peripheral flange 24 of first body panel 4 and the first alignment portion 34 is disposed on an inner surface (not shown) of the fascia panel 10. It will be understood; however, that in other embodiments the first alignment portion 34 may be disposed on the first body panel and the second alignment portion 36 may be disposed on the fascia panel, for example. The alignment portions may be disposed on their respective panels in any suitable manner, including by being integrally formed with the panel, or by being formed or molded separately on the panel, or by being formed separately and attached to the panel, with integral formation with the panel being preferred. The alignment portions may be made out of any suitable elastically deformable material, and in many embodiments may be formed from the same material as the components on which they are disposed, including various metals, thermoset polymers, thermoplastic polymers, or composite materials, or a combination thereof.
Fascia panel 10 is aligned with first body panel 4 such that tube members 85, 92, and 93 align with corresponding ones of alignment members 44, 45 and 46 as shown in
More specifically, first alignment portion 34 may be shifted along longitudinal axis 54 and the axis substantially perpendicular to longitudinal axis 54. When shifted, elastically deformable alignment members 82, 83 and 84 also shift and/or elastically deform within corresponding ones of alignment members 44, 45 and 46 as the first plurality of elastically deformable alignment elements 60 engage and interact with the second plurality of elastically deformable alignment elements 94. The elastically deformable alignment members 82, 83 and 84, particularly as hollow tube members 85, 92 and 93, are not only elastically deformed (i.e., compressed) around their periphery as they are inserted into the receivers 47, 52 and 53, but they may also be axially elastically deformed (i.e. deflected) in bending along their length, acting as cantilevered beams, to provide elastic averaging and a coarse alignment of the first alignment portions 34 and the second alignment portions 36. Bending may occur due to the longitudinal axes 100 of the alignment members 42-44 (i.e., receivers 47, 52 and 53) not being coincident with the longitudinal axes 102 of the elastically deformable alignment members 82, 83 and 84 as shown in
At this point it should be understood that the exemplary embodiment or embodiments describe an elastically averaged alignment system including first and second alignment portions 34, 36 that are aligned, engaged and subsequently adjusted and seated to establish an elastically averaged predetermined or final position. The elastically averaged final position leads to a desired fit and finish between adjacent components, such as a fit and finish defined by a predetermined flushness and gap or spacing between the components. It should also be understood that while shown and illustrated in conjunction with the body panels on a vehicle, the alignment system can be employed in a wide range of environments as described herein. It should also be understood that the first and second alignment portions may be constructed from a wide range of materials that allow for the elastically deformation of the elastically deformable alignment members as well as the shifting, inter-engagement and holding of the elastically deformable alignment elements.
Any suitable elastically deformable material may be used for the elastically averaged alignment system 30 including first and second alignment portions 34, 36, particularly those materials that are elastically deformable when formed into the features described herein. This includes various metals, polymers, ceramics, inorganic materials or glasses, or composites of any of the aforementioned materials, or any other combinations thereof. Many composite materials are envisioned, including various filled polymers, including glass, ceramic, metal and inorganic material filled polymers, particularly glass, metal, ceramic, inorganic or carbon fiber filled polymers. Any suitable filler morphology may be employed, including all shapes and sizes of particulates or fibers. More particularly any suitable type of fiber may be used, including continuous and discontinuous fibers, woven and unwoven cloths, felts or tows, or a combination thereof. Any suitable metal may be used, including various grades and alloys of steel, cast iron, aluminum, magnesium or titanium, or composites thereof, or any other combinations thereof. Polymers may include both thermoplastic polymers or thermoset polymers, or composites thereof, or any other combinations thereof, including a wide variety of co-polymers and polymer blends. In one embodiment, a preferred plastic material is one having elastic properties so as to deform elastically without fracture, as for example, a material comprising an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) polymer, and more particularly a polycarbonate ABS polymer blend (PC/ABS). The material may be in any form and formed or manufactured by any suitable process, including stamped or formed metal, composite or other sheets, forgings, extruded parts, pressed parts, castings, or molded parts and the like, to include the deformable features described herein. The elastically averaged alignment system 30 including first and second alignment portions 34, 36, may be formed in any suitable manner. They may be integrally formed or manufactured with the first component, or they may formed together separately and attached to the first component, or they may both be formed entirely separately and attached to the first component. When formed separately, they may be formed from different materials than those of the first component to provide a predetermined elastic response characteristic, for example. The material, or materials, may be selected to provide a predetermined elastic response characteristic of any or all of the first component or the second component. The predetermined elastic response characteristic may include, for example, a predetermined elastic modulus.
While the invention has been described with reference to exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiments disclosed, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the application.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1301302 | Nolan | Apr 1919 | A |
1819126 | Scheibe | Aug 1931 | A |
1982076 | Spahn | Nov 1934 | A |
2006525 | Thal | Jul 1935 | A |
2482488 | Franc | Sep 1949 | A |
2688894 | Modrey | Sep 1954 | A |
2778399 | Mroz | Jan 1957 | A |
2780128 | Rapata | Feb 1957 | A |
2862040 | Curran | Nov 1958 | A |
2902902 | Slone | Sep 1959 | A |
3005282 | Christiansen | Oct 1961 | A |
3014563 | Bratton | Dec 1961 | A |
3087352 | Daniel | Apr 1963 | A |
3130512 | Van Buren, Jr. | Apr 1964 | A |
3168961 | Yates | Feb 1965 | A |
3169004 | Rapata | Feb 1965 | A |
3194292 | Borowsky | Jul 1965 | A |
3213189 | Mitchell et al. | Oct 1965 | A |
3233358 | Dehm | Feb 1966 | A |
3233503 | Birger | Feb 1966 | A |
3244057 | Mathison | Apr 1966 | A |
3531850 | Durand | Oct 1970 | A |
3643968 | Horvath | Feb 1972 | A |
3680272 | Meyer | Aug 1972 | A |
3842565 | Brown et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3895408 | Leingang | Jul 1975 | A |
3905570 | Nieuwveld | Sep 1975 | A |
4158511 | Herbenar | Jun 1979 | A |
4213675 | Pilhall | Jul 1980 | A |
4394853 | Lopez-Crevillen et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4406033 | Chisholm et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4481160 | Bree | Nov 1984 | A |
4575060 | Kitagawa | Mar 1986 | A |
4605575 | Auld et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4767647 | Bree | Aug 1988 | A |
4805272 | Yamaguchi | Feb 1989 | A |
4817999 | Drew | Apr 1989 | A |
4819983 | Alexander et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4973212 | Jacobs | Nov 1990 | A |
5139285 | Lasinski | Aug 1992 | A |
5154479 | Sautter, Jr. | Oct 1992 | A |
5208507 | Jung | May 1993 | A |
5234122 | Cherng | Aug 1993 | A |
5297322 | Kraus | Mar 1994 | A |
5342139 | Hoffman | Aug 1994 | A |
5397206 | Sihon | Mar 1995 | A |
5507610 | Benedetti et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5513603 | Ang et al. | May 1996 | A |
5524786 | Skudlarek | Jun 1996 | A |
5538079 | Pawlick | Jul 1996 | A |
5556808 | Williams et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5577301 | Demaagd | Nov 1996 | A |
5577779 | Dangel | Nov 1996 | A |
5580204 | Hultman | Dec 1996 | A |
5601453 | Horchler | Feb 1997 | A |
5634757 | Schanz | Jun 1997 | A |
5667271 | Booth | Sep 1997 | A |
5698276 | Mirabitur | Dec 1997 | A |
5736221 | Hardigg et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5795118 | Osada et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5806915 | Takabatake | Sep 1998 | A |
5810535 | Fleckenstein et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5941673 | Hayakawa et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6073315 | Rasmussen | Jun 2000 | A |
6193430 | Culpepper et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209175 | Gershenson | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6209178 | Wiese et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6264869 | Notarpietro et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6299478 | Jones et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6321495 | Oami | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6349904 | Polad | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354815 | Svihla et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6378931 | Kolluri et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6398449 | Loh | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6484370 | Kanie et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485241 | Oxford | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6533391 | Pan | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6543979 | Iwatsuki | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6568701 | Burdack et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6579397 | Spain et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591801 | Fonville | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6609717 | Hinson | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6664470 | Nagamoto | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6677065 | Blauer | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6712329 | Ishigami et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6840969 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6857676 | Kawaguchi et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6908117 | Pickett, Jr. et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6932416 | Clauson | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6948753 | Yoshida et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6959954 | Brandt et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6971831 | Fattori et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6997487 | Kitzis | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008003 | Hirose et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7014094 | Alcoe | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7017239 | Kurily et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7036779 | Kawaguchi et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7089998 | Crook | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7178855 | Catron et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7198315 | Cass et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7306418 | Kornblum | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7322500 | Maierholzner | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7344056 | Shelmon et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7435031 | Granata | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454105 | Yi | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7487884 | Kim | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7557051 | Ryu et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
D602349 | Andersson | Oct 2009 | S |
7764853 | Yi | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7793998 | Matsui et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7802831 | Isayama et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7828372 | Ellison | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7862272 | Nakajima | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7883137 | Bar | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8061861 | Paxton et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8101264 | Pace et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8136819 | Yoshitsune et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8162375 | Gurtatowski et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8203496 | Miller et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8261581 | Cerruti et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8297137 | Dole | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8297661 | Proulx et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8444199 | Takeuchi et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8695201 | Morris | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8833832 | Whipps | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8834058 | Woicke | Sep 2014 | B2 |
20020045086 | Tsuji et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020060275 | Polad | May 2002 | A1 |
20020092598 | Jones et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020136617 | Imahigashi | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030080131 | Fukuo | May 2003 | A1 |
20030082986 | Wiens et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030087047 | Blauer | May 2003 | A1 |
20030108401 | Agha et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030180122 | Dobson | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040131896 | Blauer | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139678 | Pervan | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040208728 | Fattori et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050031946 | Kruger et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050244250 | Okada et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060102214 | Clemons | May 2006 | A1 |
20060110109 | Yu | May 2006 | A1 |
20060141318 | MacKinnon et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060197356 | Catron et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060249520 | DeMonte | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070126211 | Moerke et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070144659 | De La Fuente | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070292205 | Duval | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080073888 | Enriquez | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080094447 | Drury et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080217796 | Van Bruggen et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080260488 | Scroggie et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090072591 | Baumgartner | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090091156 | Neubrand | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090134652 | Araki | May 2009 | A1 |
20090174207 | Lota | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090265896 | Beak | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100001539 | Kikuchi et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100021267 | Nitsche | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100102538 | Paxton et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100270745 | Hurlbert et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110076588 | Yamaura | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110175376 | Whitens et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110207024 | Bogumil et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110239418 | Huang | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110296764 | Sawatani et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110311332 | Ishman | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120115010 | Smith et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120251226 | Liu et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120261951 | Mildner et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130019454 | Colombo et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130019455 | Morris | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130071181 | Herzinger et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130157015 | Morris | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130287992 | Morris | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140033493 | Morris et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140041176 | Morris | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140041185 | Morris et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140041199 | Morris | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140042704 | Polewarczyk | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047691 | Colombo et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140047697 | Morris | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140080036 | Smith et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140132023 | Watanabe | May 2014 | A1 |
20140157578 | Morris et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140159412 | Morris et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140208561 | Colombo et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140208572 | Colombo et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140292013 | Colombo et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140298638 | Colombo et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140298640 | Morris et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140298962 | Morris et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140300130 | Morris et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140301103 | Colombo et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140301777 | Morris et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140301778 | Morris et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1129162 | Aug 1996 | CN |
1328521 | Dec 2001 | CN |
1670986 | Sep 2005 | CN |
100573975 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1771399 | May 2006 | CN |
2888807 | Apr 2007 | CN |
2915389 | Jun 2007 | CN |
101250964 | Apr 2008 | CN |
201268336 | Jul 2009 | CN |
201703439 | Jan 2011 | CN |
201737062 | Feb 2011 | CN |
201792722 | Apr 2011 | CN |
202079532 | Dec 2011 | CN |
3704190 | Dec 1987 | DE |
3711696 | Oct 1988 | DE |
3805693 | Feb 1989 | DE |
69600357 | Dec 1998 | DE |
10234253 | Apr 2004 | DE |
102008005618 | Jul 2009 | DE |
102010028323 | Nov 2011 | DE |
102011050003 | Oct 2012 | DE |
0118796 | Sep 1984 | EP |
1132263 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1273766 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1293384 | Mar 2003 | EP |
2450259 | May 2012 | EP |
2458454 | May 2012 | EP |
2001171554 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2005268004 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006205918 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2009084844 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2008140659 | Nov 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Balasubramaniam, M., Golaski, E., Son, S., Sriram, K., Slocum, A. “An Ant-Backlash 2 Part Shaft Coupling with Interlocking Elastically Averaged Teeth”, Precis. Eng., vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 314-330, 2002. |
Cross-sectional view of a prior art infrared welded assembly of BMW, Munich, Germany. Believed on the market since about Jan. 1, 2010. |
“Elastic Averaging in Flexture Mechanisms: A Multi-Beam Paralleaogram Flexture Case-Study” by Shorya Awtar and Edip Sevincer, Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2006, Paper DETC2006-99752, American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Sep. 2006. |
“An Anti Backlash Two-Part Shaft Coupling With Interlocking Elastically Averaged Teeth” by Mahadevan Balasubramaniam, Edmund Golaski, Seung-Kil Son, Krishnan Sriram, and Alexander Slocum, Precision Engineering, V. 26, No. 3, Elsevier Publishing, Jul. 2002. |
“The Design of High Precision Parallel Mechnisms Using Binary Actuation and Elastic Averaging: With Application to MRI Cancer Treatment” by L.M. Devita, J.S. Plante, and S. Dubowsky, 12th IFToMM World Congress (France), Jun. 2007. |
“Passive Alignment of Micro-Fluidic Chips Using the Principle of Elastic Averaging” by Sitanshu Gurung, Thesis, Louisiana State University, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Dec. 2007. |
“Precision Connector Assembly Using Elastic Averaging” by Patrick J. Willoughby and Alexander H. Slocum, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, American Society for Precision Engineering, 2004. |
“Coupling Types—Elastic Averaging.” MIT. Aug. 3, 2012, [online], [retrieved on Nov. 12, 2014]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://web.archive.org/web/20120308055935/http://pergatory.mit.edu/kinematiccouplings/html/about/elastic—averaging.html>. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140292013 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |