Patent Grant
8661915
A. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to transducers or sensors used to measure forces or pressures exerted on a surface. More particularly, the invention relates to fabric force sensor arrays which use elastically stretchable piezoresistive thread sensor elements and are sufficiently conformable to irregularly-shaped objects to be incorporated into clothing wearable by people, and methods of making such arrays.
B. Description of Background Art
Whenever a human body is supported by an object such as a chair or bed, normal and shear forces produced in reaction to the weight of the individual are transmitted from the supporting surface through the skin, adipose tissues, muscles, etc. to the skeleton. The forces exerted on body parts by support surfaces, which are equal and opposite to body weight forces, can in some cases cause damage to tissues. Forces on body parts can compress internal blood vessels and occlude nutrients from the tissue, the product of the magnitude and duration of these forces determining whether tissue damage or morbidity will occur. High pressure alone is generally not sufficient to deleteriously affect tissue. Deep-sea divers for example, are subjected to high, but evenly distributed normal forces and do not suffer from tissue damage. If, however, there is a sufficiently large external pressure gradient on a body part, resulting from, for example, a low-pressure area adjacent to a high-pressure area, internal body fluids can migrate to the area of lower pressure. Tangential or shear forces exerted externally on a body part can also collapse internal capillaries and blood vessels by distorting them along their longitudinal axes. It is therefore extremely important to know both the surface force gradient (pressure gradient) and the externally applied shear force exerted on tissue, because it is the combination of these factors that leads to tissue strain and subsequent tissue death. Thus, even relatively small external shear and normal forces, which may be independent of one another, can combine to produce damagingly large shear stresses on internal tissue. The areas of the human body which are most at risk of developing tissue damage such as a pressure sore are: heel, ischial tuberosities, greater trochanter, occiput and sacrum.
There are available a variety of pressure/force sensors, shear sensors and sensor arrays which are useable for measuring normal and shear forces exerted on human tissues. For example, the present inventor's U.S. Pat. No. 5,751,973, Nov. 5, 1996, Multi-Directional Piezoresistive Shear And Normal Force Sensors For Hospital Mattresses And Seat Cushions discloses thin, planar sensors for measuring reaction forces exerted by mattresses or chair pads on the body of a recumbent or seated patient. One embodiment of the invention disclosed in the specification of the '973 patent includes a sensor comprised of a two-dimensional array of isolated sensor element pads, each consisting of a thin, flat layer formed of a non-conductive elastomeric polymer matrix filled with electrically conductive particles. A matrix of upper and lower conductive elements in electrical contact with upper and lower sides of each sensor pad enables separate measurements to be made of the electrical resistance of each pad. Pressure exerted on each pad, e.g., in response to a normal force exerted on the sensor matrix by a person's body, reduces the thickness of the sensor pad, and therefore its electrical resistance by a bulk or volume piezoresistive effect.
The present inventor also disclosed a novel method and apparatus for measuring pressures exerted on human feet or horses' hooves in U.S. Pat. No. 6,216,545, Apr. 17, 2001, Piezoresistive Foot Pressure Measurement. The novel apparatus disclosed in the '545 patent includes a rectangular array of piezoresistive force sensor elements encapsulated in a thin, flexible polymer package. Each sensor element includes a polymer fabric mesh impregnated with conductive particles suspended in an elastomeric matrix such as silicone rubber. The piezoresistive mesh layer is sandwiched between an array of row and column conductor strip laminations, preferably made of a nylon mesh impregnated with printed metallic paths. Each region of piezoresistive material sandwiched between a row conductor and column conductor comprises an individually addressable normal force or pressure sensor in a rectangular array of sensors, the resistance of which varies inversely in a pre-determined way as a function of pressure exerted on the sensors, and thus enabling the force or pressure distribution exerted by an object contacting the array to be mapped.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,543,299, Apr. 8, 2003, Pressure Measurement Sensor With Piezoresistive Thread Lattice, the present inventor disclosed a transducer sensor array for measuring forces or pressures exerted on a surface, the array including a fabric-like, two-dimensional lattice of individual force or pressure sensor transducer elements comprising intersecting regions of pairs of elongated, flexible threads, each consisting of a central electrically conductive wire core covered by a layer of piezoresistive material which has an electrical resistivity that varies inversely with pressure exerted on the material.
In U.S. Pat. No. 7,201,063, Apr. 10, 2007, Normal Force Gradient/Shear Force Sensors And Method Of Measuring Internal Biological Tissue Stress, the present inventor disclosed a normal force gradient/shear force sensor device and measurement method for measuring internal stresses in tissues of a person supported by a chair or bed. The device includes a planar matrix array of peripheral normal force sensors radially spaced from central shear force sensors, each including an electrically conductive disk located within a circular opening bordered by circumferentially spaced apart electrodes. The disk and electrodes are located between upper and lower cover sheets made of a stretchable material such as polyurethane, one cover sheet being adhered to the disk and the other sheet being adhered to a support sheet for the electrodes. Motion between the cover sheets in response to shear forces exerted on the array causes the disk to press more or less tightly against the electrodes, thus varying electrical conductance between the disk and electrodes proportionally to the magnitude and direction of the shear force. Each normal force sensor includes an electrically conductive film pressed between row and column conductors. Measurements of conductance values of pairs of sensor, which vary proportionally to normal forces exerted on the sensor, are used to calculate a gradient vector of normal forces exerted by a body part on the sensor array, which is combined with the shear force vectors in an algorithm to calculate internal reaction shear forces, e.g., on flesh near a bony prominence.
In co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/075,937, filed Mar. 15, 2008, the present inventor disclosed an Adaptive Cushion Method And Apparatus For Minimizing Force Concentrations On A Human Body. That apparatus included an adaptive cushion for placement on a mattress or chair, the cushion having a matrix of air bladder cells which are individually pressurizable to variable pressures by means of an air compressor and valves. The apparatus disclosed in that application also included a flexible, stretchable planar array of force sensor transducers of novel construction, which is preferably positioned on the upper surface of the cushion, the array having at least one sensor in vertical alignment with each air bladder cell of the cushion.
The sensor array disclosed in the above-cited patent application included stretchable fabric row and column conductors which have sandwiched between inner facing conductive surfaces thereof a stretchable fabric sheet coated with a piezoresistive material. Thus constructed, the planar sensor array is elastically deformable in response to forces exerted on the array by the weight of a human body supported on the upper surface of the sensor array overlying the air bladder cells. Preferably, the sensor array is placed on the upper surfaces of the air bladder cells and maintained in that position by a form-fitting, waterproof, contour sheet. The fabric matrices for both row and column conductors, as well as the central piezoresistive layer, are all made of a material which is elastically deformable in any direction within the plane of the material. In a preferred embodiment, the fabric matrices or the row conductor sheet and column conductor sheet are plated with a copper base coat and nickle cover coat. The central piezoresistive sheet consists of a synthetic fabric matrix coated with piezoresistive coating. The sensor array also has an upper cover sheet which is made of a fabric such as Lycra which has a two-way stretch characteristic, i.e., is elastically stretchable in orthogonal directions.
To avoid cross-talk between measurements of the resistance of individual sensors in the array, by which measurements forces exerted on the sensors are determined, the sensors were constructed in a novel way which gave them non-bilateral, asymmetric current-versus-voltage impedance characteristics. The sensors were modified to have a diode-like characteristic by altering either the upper or lower surface of the central piezoresistive sheet to form thereon a P-N, semiconductor-type junction, by a novel method described in detail in the disclosure of that application.
The flexible force sensor arrays described above have proven highly effective in performing their intended functions. However, there are situations in which it would be desirable to have available force sensor arrays with somewhat different characteristics not offered by prior sensor arrays.
For example, if typical existing flexible sensor arrays are used to measure pressures exerted on a human body by a very form-fitting, conformal wheelchair seat cushion or extremely low pressure bed mattress or cushion, such sensor arrays often interfere with the function of the cushion or bed support surface, and give erroneous force measurements which are used to map the way the bed or chair supports a person. Such errors result from a “hammocking” effect, in which a flexible but not drapable sensor array deployed between fixed support positions cannot conform precisely to the shape of a patient. This effect can occur for example, using sensor arrays that use wire core sensing elements which make the arrays essentially non-stretchable. The lack of conformability of a sensor array alters the way a cushion or bed supports a patient, and also frequently results in forces or pressures exerted on individual sensors in the array being larger than a patient would actually encounter in the absence of the sensor array.
Another situation in which present force sensor arrays for measuring and mapping forces exerted on human body parts are less than satisfactory occurs when attempting to make such measurements in a non-obtrusive, non-interfering manner on body parts which have complex shapes such as the feet.
For example, people who have diabetes often lose feeling sensation in their feet. Since they cannot feel when an ill-fitting shoe is exerting excessive pressure on parts of the foot, the pressure spots can lead to ulcers, which may in turn necessitate amputation of the foot. Accordingly, to prevent such undesirable results, it would be desirable to have a sensor array which could be used to identify such problems, so that corrective actions such as changing the size or shape of a shoe may be taken in a timely manner.
To address the problem of measuring and mapping forces exerted on complex shapes having compound curves, such as a human foot, it would be desirable to have available a sensor array which was similar to clothing fabric in its ability to readily conform to complex, compoundly curved objects such as a human foot. Such sensor arrays could be incorporated into articles of clothing, such as socks. The present invention was conceived of at least partially in response to the unavailability of present sensor arrays to fulfill the requirements described above.
An object of the present invention is to provide elastically stretchable arrays of force or pressure sensing transducers which are conformable to objects having complex, compoundly curved shapes such as human body parts, to facilitate measuring and mapping forces or pressures exerted on such objects.
Another object of the invention is to provide elastically stretchable fabric-like pressure or force sensor arrays which are sufficiently light in weight and conformally drapable to be incorporated into an article of clothing wearable by a human being.
Another object of the invention is to provide pressure or force sensor arrays which include a matrix of thin, flexible individual force sensors which are incorporated into an elastically stretchable fabric matrix.
Another object of the invention is to provide thin, elastically stretchable drapable planar arrays of piezoresistive force or pressure sensors which are incorporated into a sock or other article of clothing.
Another object of the invention is to provide a thin, elastically stretchable drapable array of piezoresistive force or pressure sensors and an electronic control module electrically coupled to the array which is effective in measuring electrical resistance of individual sensors and thus facilitate mapping of forces or pressures exerted on various parts of the array.
Another object of the invention is to provide a force or pressure measurement system including an elastically stretchable fabric-like array of individual piezoresistive pressure or force sensor elements arranged in a matrix of rows and columns and connected by row and column electrodes to a resistance measurement electronic module, conductive paths to each sensor element including a diode-like circuit element to thus minimize cross talk in the matrix addressing of individual sensors.
Another object of the invention is to provide methods for making elastically stretchable flexible, fabric-like force or pressure sensor arrays using groups of electrically conductive threads arranged into rows and columns.
Another object of the invention is to provide methods for fabricating flexible, elastically stretchable fabric-like force or pressure sensors arranged into X-Y matrices, the sensors including a piezoresistive substance contacted by intersecting conductive threads.
Another object of the invention is to provide methods for fabricating fabric-like force or pressure sensor arrays which include elastically stretchable flexible electrically conductive threads that are coated with a piezoresistive material.
Another object of the invention is to provide methods for fabricating fabric-like force or pressure sensor arrays in which elastically stretchable electrically conductive threads are sewn to a fabric matrix using non-conductive threads.
Another object of the invention is to provide methods for fabricating elastically stretchable electrically conductive threads which have a piezoresistive characteristic.
Another object of the invention is to provide methods for fabricating elastically stretchable piezoresistive conductive threads which have a diode-like, non-bilateral electrical impedance characteristic.
Another object of the invention is to provide elastically stretchable flexible force or pressure sensor arrays which use electrically conductive threads that are elastically stretchable to thereby enhance stretchability of the arrays.
Another object of the invention is to provide elastically stretchable flexible force or pressure sensor arrays which use electrically conductive threads that are sinuously disposed and attached to an elastically stretchable substrate to thereby enhance elastic stretchability of the array.
Various other objects and advantages of the present invention, and its most novel features, will become apparent to those skilled in the art by perusing the accompanying specification, drawings and claims.
It is to be understood that although the invention disclosed herein is fully capable of achieving the objects and providing the advantages described, the characteristics of the invention described herein are merely illustrative of the preferred embodiments. Accordingly, I do not intend that the scope of my exclusive rights and privileges in the invention be limited to details of the embodiments described. I do intend that equivalents, adaptations and modifications of the invention reasonably inferable from the description contained herein be included within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Briefly stated, the present invention comprehends novel pressure or force sensing transducers which include individual force sensing elements that are arranged in planar arrays on or within a substrate consisting of a thin, flexible polymer sheet or a thin sheet of woven or non-woven fabric. Pressure or force sensor arrays according to the present invention utilize elastically stretchable electrically conductive threads which are attached to a thin, elastically flexible substrate sheet consisting of an insulating polymer sheet or fabric sheet using a novel fabrication technique. The arrays are sufficiently flexible, drapable and elastically stretchable to be incorporated into articles of clothing such as socks. This novel construction enables elastically stretchable, conformally drapable pressure or force sensor arrays according to the present invention to be used to measure and map force or pressure distributions on compoundly curved, complexly shaped objects such as a human foot.
Pressure sensor arrays according to the present invention may, for example, be advantageously used to measure and map pressure or force concentrations exerted by an ill-fitting shoe on the foot of a patient who has lost feeling sensations in the foot because of diabetes or other medical ailment. Using information provided by pressure maps producible using the conformable sensor arrays according to the present invention enables re-sizing, modifying or replacing an ill-fitting shoe to reduce pressure concentrations on a patient's foot to values sufficiently low as to preclude the formation of health-threatening ulcers on the foot.
Basic embodiments of elastically stretchable force or pressure sensor arrays according to the present invention utilize flexible, electrically conductive threads having a relatively small diameter, e.g., in a range of about 2 mm to 4 mm. In a basic polymer film substrate version of the invention, each sensor element in an array is formed by the intersection of a first, e.g., upper, row conductive thread attached to the lower surface of an upper thin, insulating polymer substrate sheet, and a second, lower column conductive thread attached to the upper surface of a lower thin, insulating polymer substrate sheet. Preferably, both upper and lower polymer substrate sheets are made of a material which is flexible and elastically stretchable, such as 0.05-0.076 mm thick, elastomeric polyvinyl chloride (PVC).
According to the invention, the intersection of each pair of conductive threads in a sensor array, such as the intersection of a row thread and a column thread, includes sandwiched between the threads a layer, coating, or small dot made of a piezoresistive material, the electrical resistance of which varies inversely with force or pressure exerted on it. Preferably, the piezoresistive material has an elastic or elastomeric characteristic so that cyclical pressure variations on the sensor do not cause excessive hysterisis effects in the electrical resistance versus pressure transfer function of the sensor. A suitable piezoresistive material which meets the foregoing requirements consists of a solid solution of silicone rubber filled with conductive particles such as carbon black or carbon fibers.
When the piezoresistive material between a pair of intersecting conductive threads is compressed as a result of a normal force causing the threads to be urged more closely together, the electrical resistance measured between the pair of conductive threads decreases in proportion to the magnitude of force or pressure. The decrease in resistance is believed to be due to a combination of surface and volume piezoresistive effects.
In the surface piezoresistive effect, the size of the interacting contact area between a pair of conductive threads and a piezoresistive spot increases when the threads are pressed together, thus increasing electrical conductance between the threads. Compression of the elastomeric piezoresistive material apparently increases electrical conductance by a volume piezoresistive effect, a result of conductive particles in the elastomeric matrix of the piezoresistive spot being urged more closely together, and the thickness of the spot being decreased.
According to one aspect of the invention, a basic embodiment of the invention using polymer sheet substrates employs a thin sheet of piezoresistive material sandwiched between upper and lower polymer sheets to which are attached row and column conductive threads, respectively. This embodiment of the invention has three discrete layers.
In a preferred, two-layer embodiment of a polymer film sensor array according to the present invention, piezoresistive material is coated directly onto the outer surfaces of the row conductive threads, the column conductive threads, or, preferably, both row and column conductive threads, thus eliminating the requirement for a third, intermediate substrate sheet containing piezoresistive material.
In an array of Q individual sensor elements such as those of either of the two basic embodiments of the invention described above, the unambiguous measurement of the resistance of each individual sensor required to unambiguously determine the magnitude of pressure or force exerted on each sensor requires for the Q sensor elements, R=Q+1 lead-out conductors. Thus, each of Q sensor elements may have one terminal of a sensor element connected to a common conductive lead-out conductor, and a separate lead-out conductor connected to an opposite terminal of each sensor element.
For a square matrix of m×n=Q sensors, the number of lead-out conductors required to address each of the Q sensors located at the Q intersection points of m row and n column sensor conductive threads is only R=2√Q. Thus, for example, in an array of 64 sensor elements, individually measuring the resistance of each of the sensor elements would require 65 electrically isolated lead-out conductors. On the other hand, using a matrix addressing arrangement, there would only be required a total of 16 lead-out conductors, i.e., 8 row conductors and 8 row column conductors. Therefore, it would be desirable to utilize matrix addressing to measure the resistance of each sensor element.
There is, however, a problem associated with measuring the resistance of sensor elements in an array using matrix addressing of the sensor elements. The problem results from the fact that the electrical resistances of all the non-addressed sensor elements in an array shunts the resistance of each addressed sensor element, resulting in cross-talk inaccuracies in measurements of individual sensor element resistances, and therefore of pressures inferred from those measurements.
To overcome the cross-talk problem, sensors according to the present invention are preferably fabricated to have an asymmetric, diode-like current-versus-voltage transfer function. The diode-like transfer function is achieved by treating the piezoresistive coatings on the surface of the conductive threads to form thereon a P-N junction. Alternatively, either or both upper and lower surfaces of a piezoresistive film between row and column conductive threads is treated to give it a P-N junction characteristic. As explained in detail below, the P-N junction characteristic is provided by depositing an electroless coating containing an oxide of copper or other metal to a surface of a piezoresistive, carbon-containing layer.
Preferred embodiments of pressure sensor arrays according to the present invention are preferably fabricated using sheets of a woven elastic fabric, rather than sheets of polymer film. The woven fabric results in sensor arrays which are more stretchable and drapable, and hence more readily conformable to irregularly curved surfaces.
In a basic embodiment of a force sensor array using a woven fabric substrate according to the present invention, laterally spaced apart, longitudinally disposed conductive threads are fastened to the lower surface of a first, upper fabric sheet. Preferably, the conductor threads are fastened to the upper fabric substrate sheet by sewed, zig-zag stitching using non-conductive threads of smaller diameter than the conductive threads.
A second, lower fabric substrate sheet is prepared in the same way as the upper sheet, with the conductive threads located on the upper side of the lower sheet.
Upper and lower sheets may optionally be fabricated from a single substrate fabric sheet that has conductive threads sewn onto one surface thereof, the sheet cut in two and one of the halves reversed and rotated 90 degrees so that confronting surfaces of the two half sheets form a matrix of intersections, consisting of rows of conductive threads and columns of conductive threads. A piezoresistive film layer is then positioned between upper and lower fabric substrate sheets, and the three sheets fastened together along their peripheral edges to thus form a two-dimensional planar array containing a matrix of individual sensor elements.
In preferred embodiments of force sensor arrays using fabric substrates according to the present invention, the piezoresistive film layer positioned between row and column conductive threads of the sensor consists of coatings of a piezoresistive substance which are applied to outer surfaces of the conductive threads. The piezoresistive coating may be applied to the outer surface of row or column conductors by a novel process according to the invention, but is preferably applied to both row and column threads.
Sensor arrays having the novel construction according to the present invention which use highly flexible, elastically stretchable row and column conductor threads stitched to the inner facing surface of a pair of confronting substrate panels made of a light-weight drapable fabric are readily conformable to irregular surfaces, thus facilitating measurement of forces exerted on surfaces of irregularly shaped objects.
Preferred embodiments of fabric substrate piezoresistive force sensor arrays according to the present invention are given an enhanced stretchability, drapability and conformability by utilizing a stretchable fabric which contains Spandex or Lycra as the substrate material. Preferably, the stretchable fabric substrates have an isotropic, or at least two-way stretch characteristic, so that the sensor array may be elastically stretched to conform to an irregularly shaped object with equal compliance in all directions, or at least two perpendicular directions, respectively. With this construction, the conductive threads themselves may limit stretchability of the sensor array. The stretchability and conformability of sensor arrays according to the present invention is preferably increased by either of the following two methods.
According to a first method of enhancing stretchability of sensor arrays according to the present invention, stretchability of an array is increased by using a stretchy conductive yarn rather than a monofilament thread for the row and column conductive threads. The conductive yarn may be used as a core for either row or column piezoresistive threads, but is preferably used for both row and column conductor threads, to provide enhanced two-way stretchability.
In a second method of enhancing stretchability of sensor arrays according to the present invention, either or both row and column piezoresistive threads are arranged in a serpentine or sinuously disposed lines with respect to a straight base line between opposite ends of a row or column thread, rather than remaining on the base lines. With this sinuous arrangement, the slack formed by transversely disposed portions of a conductive thread enables the longitudinal spacing between peaks and valleys of the sinuously curved thread to increase when the fabric is stretched in the direction of the thread base line, and decrease when the fabric relaxes to an unstretched state. Put another way, the spatial wavelength of the sinuously curved conductive thread increases when the sensor array is elastically stretched, and decreases when stretching forces on the array are relaxed to thus allow the array to elastically recover its unstretched shape.
Optionally, sensor arrays according to the present invention may utilize both stretchy elastic conductive threads, and sinuously curved arrangements of the threads, to maximize elastic stretchability of the arrays.
According to another aspect of the invention, a single layer fabric substrate sensor array is provided which is light in weight and highly conformable. This embodiment of sensor arrays according to the present invention uses a single fabric substrate panel which has been impregnated with a piezoresistive substances. Row and column conductive threads are sewn to opposite outer surfaces of the fabric substrate. Enhanced stretchability and conformability for this embodiment may optionally be provided by using either or both stretchy yarn and sinuously curving of the conductive threads, as described above.
The entire disclosure of U.S. Pat. No. 6,543,299 is hereby incorporated by reference into the present disclosure.
Referring first to
As shown in
According to the invention, the electrically conductive row threads 31 and column threads 32 consist of an elastically stretchable monofilament or woven polymer core 31C, 32C, which has been treated to make the threads electrically conductive, as by silver plating the core to form coatings 31P, 32P on cores 31C, 32C, respectively.
One type of example embodiment of a sensor array 30 according to the present invention used row and column conductive threads 31, 32 made from silver plated nylon thread, 117/17 2 ply, catalog #A264, obtained from LESS EMF, 809 Madison Avenue, Albany, N.Y. 12208, USA. That conductive thread had a lineal resistivity of about 75 ohms per foot, and an elastic stretchability of about 1 percent, i.e., at least 10 times greater than that of a stainless steel wire of a similar diameter.
A second type of example embodiment of a sensor array according to the present invention uses row and column conductive threads made from silver plated stretchy nylon yarn, that plated yarn having the designation Shieldex, Lycra® dtex 20, obtained from W. Zimmerman, GmbH & Co. K6, Riederstrasse 7, D-88171, Weiter-Simmerberg, Germany. That conductive thread had a lineal resistivity of about 500 ohms per foot. The elastic stretchability of that conductive yarn is greater than 30 percent, i.e., at least 300 times greater than that of a stainless steel wire of a similar diameter.
As shown in
As may be seen best by referring to
In example embodiments of sensor array 32, piezoresistive sheet 37 was fabricated by coating a stretchy, i.e., elastically stretchable thin Lycra-like fabric sheet with a piezoresistive material. A suitable fabric sheet, which forms a matrix for supporting the piezoresistive material, was a fabric known by the trade name Platinum, Milliken, Style #247579, obtained from the manufacturer, Milliken & Company, Spartenburg, S.C., USA. That fabric had a fiber content of 69 percent nylon and 31 percent Spandex, a thread count of about 88 threads per inch, and aa thickness of 0.010 inch.
The piezoresistive material used to coat the fabric matrix is made as follows:
A solution of graphite, carbon powder, nickel powder and acrylic binder are mixed in proportions as required to obtain the desired resistance and piezoresistive properties. Silver coated nickel flake is used to achieve force response in the low force range of 0 to 1 psi, graphite is used for the mid range of 1 to 5 psi and Charcoal Lamp Black is used for high force range of 5 to 1000 psi. Following is a description of the substances which are constituents of the piezoresistive material:
Silver Coated Nickel Flake:
Graphite Powder:
Charcoal Lamp Black Powder:
Acrylic Binder:
Following are examples of mixtures used to make piezoresistive materials having different sensitivities:
Example I for forces in the range of 0 to 30 psi:
Example II for forces in the range of 0-100 psi
Example III for forces in the range of 0-1000 psi
The fabric matrix for piezoresistive sheet 37 is submerged in the piezoresistive coating mixture. Excess material is rolled off and the sheet is hung and allowed to air dry.
According to the invention, upper and lower substrate sheets 33, 34 are made of a thin, flexible insulating material, such as 0.002 inch thick polyurethane or polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Preferably, the substrate sheets 33, 34 are made of an elastomeric material which has a relatively high degree of elastic stretchability, so that sensor array 30 is readily stretchable and conformable to the surface of an irregularly-shaped object. It can be appreciated, however, that conductive threads 31, 32 should also be elastically stretchable to facilitate stretchability of sensor array 30. This is because conductive threads 31, 32 are affixed to substrate sheet 33, 34, respectively, by, for example, blobs of adhesive 42, as shown in
As shown in
With no external force applied to sensor array 30, the electrical resistance between a row conductive thread 31 and column conductive thread 32, which consists of the series resistance of upper contact region 43, lower contact region 44, and the effective resistance of piezoresistive material 45 of piezoresistive layer 37 between the upper and lower contact regions is relatively high. The relatively high resistance results from the fact that in this case, tangential contact regions 43 and 44 are relatively small, and the thickness of uncompressed piezoresistive volume 45 is at its maximum value. However, as shown in
Referring still to
For moderate values of normal force N, as shown in
Sensor array 50 is facially similar to sensor array 20 disclosed and shown in FIGS. 1 and 2 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,543,299, but differs from that sensor array in important ways. Thus, row and column piezoresistive threads 51, 52 of sensor array 50 are made of elastically stretchable polymer cores 51C, 52C which have been treated by silver plating the cores to form on the threads electrically conductive coatings 51P, 52P, respectively. The coatings on either or both cores 51C, 52C are clad with a layer 51R, 52R, respectively, of a material which has a piezoresistive characteristic. According to the invention, the piezoresistive material used to form cladding layers 51R, 52R on plated surfaces 51P, 52P of cores 51C, 52C, of piezoresistive conductive threads 51, 52 may have a composition similar to that described above for making piezoresistive sheet layer 37.
A method for making piezoresistive sensor threads by cladding conductive threads with a layer of a piezoresistive material according to the present invention includes preparing a slurry of piezoresistive material having a composition described in examples 1, 2 and 3 above. A highly conductive polymer thread, such as silver plated nylon thread 117/17 2 ply, Cat#124 available from LESS EMF Inc., 804 Madison Avenue, Albany, N.Y. 12208, is then immersed in a container holding the slurry, for a period of about 10 seconds. The end of a thread which has been immersed is withdrawn from the container, and while it is still wet, drawn through a circular aperture through a scraper plate.
In an example embodiment, a conductive thread having a core diameter of 0.25 mm and wet-coated diameter in the range of about 0.4 mm to 0.5 mm was drawn through a #360 scraper having a diameter of 0.45 mm, thus resulting in a wet scraped diameter of about 0.45 mm. The scraped thread was then fed through a stream of air heated to a temperature of 70 degrees C. at a linear travel speed of 100 mm/minute for a period of 5 minutes, to thus form a solidified coating having a diameter of about 0.4 mm.
As shown in
FIGS. 3 and 8A-8C illustrate how the arrangement of row and column piezoresistive threads 51, 52 of sensor array 50 form individual force sensing elements 69. In response to progressively larger compressive normal forces, piezoresistive cladding layers 51R, 52R on row and column conductive core threads 51C, 52C are progressively compressed into oval cross-sectional shapes of smaller diameter. Thus, as shown in
The insulating threads 71 are secured in place by any suitable means, such as adhesively bonding the threads to substrate sheets 63, 65 (see
As may be seen best by referring to
In an example embodiment of a sensor array 80 according to the present invention, upper and lower substrate sheets 83, 85 were made from a light-weight, elastically stretchable fabric, both of the two following fabrics were tested and found suitable for substrate sheets 83, 85. (1) Milliken “Mil/glass” brand, Style #247579, composed of 69% nylon, 31% spandex, and having a weight of 1.8 oz./sq. yd. (2) Milliken “Interlude” brand, product #247211, composed of 82% nylon, 18% Lycra, and having a weight of 3.2-3.4 oz. Per sq. yd. Both of the foregoing fabrics are available from Milliken & Company, 23 Fiddler's Way, Lafayette, N.J. 07848.
As shown in
As shown in
As may be seen best by referring to
As shown in
A plurality of parallel, laterally spaced apart column piezoresistive threads 122 are fastened to the upper surface 130 of the substrate sheet. The column piezoresistive threads are made from silver-plated nylon thread, Catalog #A-264 obtained from LESS EMF, or preferably from silver-plated stretchy nylon yarn, both of which are described in detail above in conjunction with the description of sensor array 30.
In a preferred embodiment of single fabric substrate sheet sensor array 120, each column piezoresistive thread 122 is fastened to substrate sheet 127 by a smaller diameter, non-conductive thread 91 arranged in an elongated zig-zag stitching pattern. In an example embodiment, threads 91 consisted of 0.005-0.010 diameter, 100% polyester.
As shown in
As shown in
Optionally, upper row piezoresistive threads 141 may also be sinuously arranged in the same manner as lower column piezoresistive threads shown in
As shown in
If upper and lower electrical connections to each sensor element 48 were electrically isolated from connections to each other sensor element, a separate pair of lead-out conductors for each of the sensors, would be required, i.e., a total of 2Qlead-out conductors for Q sensor elements or, if a single common electrode lead-out were employed as shown in
Preferably, as shown in
Sensor elements 48 are modified to have a diode-like characteristic by modifying the preparation of piezoresistive layer sheet 37, as follows: First, a piezoresistive layer sheet 37 is prepared by the process described above. Then, either the upper surface 40 or the lower surface 41 of the piezoresistive coating 37A of piezoresistive sheet 37 is modified to form thereon a P-N, semiconductor-type junction.
Modification of piezoresistive coating 37A to form a P-N junction is performed by first preparing a slurry which has the composition of one of the three example mixtures described above, but modified by the addition of 5 ml each of copper oxide (CuO) in the form of a fine powder of 50-micron size particles, and 5 ml of cuprous oxide (Cu20) in the form of a fine powder of 50-micron size particles and thoroughly stir-mixing the foregoing ingredients. The resultant solution is then reduced using about 30 mg of solution of sodium borohydride, also known as sodium tetrahydroborate (NaBH4) or ammonium phosphate, to form a solution having a pH of about 5.5. The solution is then coated onto the upper surface 40 or lower surface 41 of piezoresistive coating 37B on piezoresistive sheet 37. This coating process is performed using a roller coating process which results in about 0.5 ml of solution per square centimeters being applied. The surface coating is then allowed to air-dry at room temperature and a relative humidity of less than 20%, for 4 hours. After the coated surface has dried, it functions as a P-type semiconductor, while the uncoated side of coating 37B functions as an N-type semiconductor of P-N junction diode.
As stated above, the advantage of modifying sensor elements 48 of sensor array 30 by adding a semi-conductive layer that acts like a diode is that it reduces cross talk between sensors. As is shown in
Rx1y1=R11//(R12+[R22]+R21), Rx1Y1=R11(R12+[R22]+R21)/(R11+R12+[R22]+R21), where brackets around a resistance value indicate current flow in a counterclockwise direction through that resistor, rather than clockwise, i.e., diagonally downwards towards the left. Thus, for example, if each of the four resistances listed above had a value of 10 ohms, the measured value of R11 would be:
R11=10(10+10+10)/(10+10+10+10)=300/40=7.5 ohms, i.e., 25% below the actual value, 10 ohms, of R11. If the resistance values of R12, R22 and R21 of the three non-addressed piezoresistive sensor element 48 were each lower, e.g., 1 ohm, because of greater forces concentrated on those sensor elements 48, the measured value of R11 would be:
R11=10(1+1+1)/(10+1+1+1)=30/13=2.31 ohms, i.e., a value of about 77 percent below the actual value of R11.
On the other hand, by placing a diode in series with each piezoresistive sensor element 48, as shown in
RX1Y1=10(1+∞+1)/(10+1+∞+1)=10 ohms, the correct value. Thus, modifying each sensor element 48 to include a p-n junction thereby give the sensor element a diode-like characteristic electrically isolates, i.e., prevents backward current flow, through each sensor element 48. This enables the correct value of electrical resistance of each sensor element 48 and hence forces exerted thereon to be measured accurately RX1y1 using row and column matrix addressing rather than requiring a separate pair of conductors for each sensor element.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
In response to control signals cyclically issued by computer 161, X multiplexer 164 and Y multiplexer 165 are used to cyclically measure the resistance of each force sensor element 88, at a relatively rapid rate of, for example, 3,000 samples per second, enabling computer 161 to calculate the force exerted on each force sensor element 88 at that sampling rate.
Measurement system 160 includes an operator interface block 167 which enables values of force or pressures measured by sensor elements 88 to be displayed as numerical values and/or a graph or pressure/force map on the display screen of a computer monitor 168, or outputted to a peripheral device such as a printer, or a network such as the internet, through an 1/0 block 169.
As shown in
Row conductor threads protruding 121 from the aligned edges of the array are then electrically conductively fastened to a first, row conductor ribbon cable 181. Column conductive threads protruding from one edge of the rolled-up array are electrically conductively fastened to a second, column conductor ribbon cable 182. Outer ends 183, 184 who protrude from an edge of array 120 are electrically connected to a resistance measuring circuit as shown in
Sensor array 200, shown in
This application is a continuation of, and claims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/380,845 filed Mar. 5, 2009, and entitled ELASTICALLY STRETCHABLE FABRIC FORCE SENSOR ARRAYS AND METHOD OF MAKING, by applicant Geoffrey Taylor, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3818756 | Barron et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
| 3996922 | Basham | Dec 1976 | A |
| 4033332 | Hardway, Jr. et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4267728 | Manley et al. | May 1981 | A |
| 4308872 | Watson et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4390028 | Okano et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4438771 | Friesen et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4509527 | Fraden | Apr 1985 | A |
| RE32180 | Lewiner et al. | Jun 1986 | E |
| 4633237 | Tucknott et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4657026 | Tagg | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4738266 | Thatcher | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4827763 | Bourland et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4986277 | Sackner | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5002060 | Nedivi | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5010772 | Bourland et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5025795 | Kunig | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5060174 | Gross | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5062169 | Kennedy et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5079949 | Tamori | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5128880 | White | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5178151 | Sackner | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5184112 | Gusakov | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5209126 | Grahn | May 1993 | A |
| 5253656 | Rincoe et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5276432 | Travis | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5448996 | Bellin et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5471198 | Newham | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5479932 | Higgins et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5515738 | Tamori | May 1996 | A |
| 5571142 | Brown et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5571973 | Taylot | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5590650 | Genova | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5600108 | Newham | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5623760 | Newham | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5633627 | Newham | May 1997 | A |
| 5640145 | Newham | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5654694 | Newham | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5684460 | Scanlon | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5722287 | Forstein | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5800360 | Kisner et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5800480 | Augustine et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5865755 | Golub | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5964720 | Pelz | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5967979 | Taylor | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5993400 | Rincoe et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6011477 | Teodorescu et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6025782 | Newham | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6033432 | Augustine et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6047203 | Sackner et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6147592 | Ulrich et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6155120 | Taylor | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6180893 | Salgo | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6210427 | Augustine et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6216545 | Taylor | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6279183 | Kummer et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6280392 | Yoshimi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6297738 | Newham | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6307168 | Newham | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| D451604 | Kasabach et al. | Dec 2001 | S |
| 6341504 | Istook | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6377177 | Broussard et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6396004 | Salgo | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6413225 | Sackner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6447457 | Forstner et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6450957 | Yoshimi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6468234 | Van der Loos et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6478744 | Mohler | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6485441 | Woodward | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6491647 | Bridger et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6493568 | Bell et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6497720 | Augustine et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6498652 | Varshneya et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6524239 | Reed et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6543299 | Taylor | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6546813 | Hubbard, Jr. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6547743 | Brydon | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6551251 | Zuckerwar et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6551252 | Sackner et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
| 6577897 | Shurubura et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
| 6585328 | Oexman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6647289 | Prutchi | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6684418 | Choi | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6685635 | Shani et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6721980 | Price et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6829501 | Nielsen et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6840117 | Hubbard, Jr. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6840907 | Brydon | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6921365 | Lee | Jul 2005 | B2 |
| 6932774 | Nakatani et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7001334 | Reed et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7030764 | Smith et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7054679 | Hirsh | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7065396 | Hampton | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7076371 | Fu | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7125383 | Hoctor et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7155273 | Taylor | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7155281 | Fayram | Dec 2006 | B1 |
| 7173437 | Hervieux et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7201063 | Taylor | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7204808 | Friedman et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
| 7211053 | Marmaropou | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7245956 | Matthews et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7282654 | Salgo et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7319386 | Collins, Jr. et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7330127 | Price et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7365031 | Swallow et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7437787 | Bhai | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7459645 | Skinner et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7480953 | Romano et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7500280 | Dixon et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7515059 | Price et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7557718 | Petrosenko et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7568246 | Weismiller et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7631557 | DeBeliso et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7646294 | Kow et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7656299 | Gentry et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7657956 | Stacy et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7699784 | Wan Fong et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 20010042412 | Serban et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020194934 | Taylor | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030004423 | Lavie et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20040087865 | Kelly | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040167418 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040186380 | Kristiansen | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210155 | Takemura et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20050075542 | Goldreich | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050101875 | Semler et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050124864 | Mack et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050171443 | Gorenberg et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050190068 | Gentry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050241409 | Taylor | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245839 | Stivoric et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050268962 | Gaudiana et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050282009 | Nusko et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060028350 | Bhai | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060065060 | Ito et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060066449 | Johnson | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060100530 | Kliot et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060100534 | Colombo et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060129047 | Ruotoistenmaki | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060173363 | Felder et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060195035 | Sun | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224072 | Shennib | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060224076 | Lange et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060241510 | Halperin et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060258914 | Derchak et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060260417 | Son et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060264767 | Shennib | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070083096 | Paradiso | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070118054 | Pinhas et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070125181 | Ofek et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070149883 | Yesha | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070156031 | Sullivan et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20080200085 | Van Bruggen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20090056027 | Ball et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090093990 | McGuire et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090099480 | Salgo et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090183312 | Price et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20100045454 | Knight et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2332063 | Jun 1999 | GB |
| 2000000214 | Jan 2000 | JP |
| 2000175904 | Jun 2000 | JP |
| 20000316915 | Nov 2000 | JP |
| 2001000401 | Jan 2001 | JP |
| 2001037821 | Feb 2001 | JP |
| 2002298110 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2003317905 | Nov 2003 | JP |
| 2004132765 | Apr 2004 | JP |
| 2004180804 | Jul 2004 | JP |
| 2005013259 | Jan 2005 | JP |
| 2005204930 | Aug 2005 | JP |
| 2005218604 | Aug 2005 | JP |
| 2007333412 | Dec 2007 | JP |
| 2008049023 | Mar 2008 | JP |
| 2008002927 | Oct 2008 | JP |
| 2005000108 | Jan 2005 | WO |
| 2007059971 | May 2007 | WO |
| 2009013981 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Makoto Shimojo, et al., “A Tactile Sensor Sheet Using Pressure Conductive Rubber With Electrical-Wires Stitched Method”, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 4, No. 5, Oct. 2004. |
| Wesley E. Snyder, et al., “Conductive Elastomers as Sensor for Industrial Parts Handling Equipment”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. IM-27, No. 1, Mar. 1978. |
| Sep. 13, 2012, Office Action from Chinese Patent Office for application 201080018961.5, the Chinese counterpart to U.S. Appl. No. 12/380,845. |
| English translation of claims of Chinese patent application 201080018961.5 as of Sep. 13, 2012. |
| Jun. 27, 2011, Office Action for commonly assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,937. |
| Sep. 27, 2011, Response to Jun. 27, 2011, Office Action for commonly assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,937. |
| Mar. 8, 2012, Office Action for commonly assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,937. |
| May 29, 2012, Response to Mar. 8, 2012, Office Action for commonly assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,937. |
| Sep. 10, 2012, Office Action for commonly assigned U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,937. |
| J.C. Barbenal et al., “Monitoring the mobility of patients in bed”, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, pp. 466-468, Sep. 1985. |
| Charles F. Babbs, et al., “A Pressure-Sensitive Mat for Measuring Contact Pressure Distributions . . .”, Biomedical Instrumentation and Technology, pp. 363-370, Sep./Oct. 1990. |
| Pending U.S. Appl. No. 12/075,937, filed Mar. 13, 2009, which is commonly assigned to the assignee of the present application. |
| PCT Search Report of the International Searching Authority regarding PCT/US2009/001620, the international counterpart to the parent of the present application. |
| Laird Technologies. Nick/Copper Polyester Taffeta. Product Specification for 3035-213. <Accessed Online> Sep. 6, 2011. <http://www.stockwell.com/data—sheets/esd—emi/3035213—nickel—polyester—taffeta.pdf>. |
| Bergen Cable Technology. Cabe! 101. <Accessed Online> Sep. 7, 2011. <http://www.bergencable.com/technology/technology—cable101.html>. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability (including Written Opinion) for PCT/US2010/000645, which claims priority to U.S. Appl. No. 12/380,845, the parent of U.S. Appl. No. 13/453,461. |
| English claims of JP2011-552938 (which claims priority to U.S. Appl. No. 12/380,845, the parent of U.S. Appl. No. 13/453,461) as of Apr. 2, 2013. |
| English translation of Apr. 2, 2013 Office Action for JP2011-552938. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120234105 A1 | Sep 2012 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12380845 | Mar 2009 | US |
| Child | 13453461 | US |
