Patent Application
20220280683
The present invention relates to a novel composition based on triblock copolymers of the ABA type, comprising two styrene thermoplastic terminal blocks A, glassy at use temperature, and an elastomeric central block B which is a saturated olefin, and at least one linear polymer of the polyisobutene type having a very low molecular weight. The present composition exhibits advantageous adhesion and holding properties on the skin which are similar to the properties obtained by means of matrices based on silicone elastomers.
The present invention also relates to a dressing comprising a matrix obtained from such an elastomeric composition.
Silicone elastomers are widely known compounds. They indeed have exceptional physical and mechanical properties and are used in many fields (automotive, medical devices, childcare, optics, cosmetics, etc.). In the field of adhesives, silicone elastomers are particularly advantageous, in particular in their application to the skin, wounds, skin appendages or mucous membranes. They are “soft” adhesives, which are not aggressive for the skin in the sense that they are well tolerated, while having good adhesion resistance over time. They are also repositionable, atraumatic during their removal and therefore well tolerated by the skin, in particular fragile skins such as peri-lesional skin. These adhesives can be applied, removed and reapplied without leaving residue or causing redness. However, the manufacturing processes for silicone elastomers are quite complex: whether they are obtained by hot or cold vulcanization, their manufacturing process must comply with very precise temperature and humidity conditions. By the nature of the components entering into their composition and their obtention process, silicone elastomers are therefore expensive.
Additionally, when intended for medical use, silicone elastomers must be sterilized. However, these compounds can only be sterilized by a very specific method with ethylene oxide, because their exposure to any light radiation (constituting a conventional sterilization technique) causes a modification in their structure, resulting in their adhesive properties being degraded.
Thus, the present invention proposes to develop a specific composition based on non-silicone elastomers exhibiting interesting adhesion and holding properties on the skin, being close to the properties obtained by means of compositions based on silicone elastomers. Such compositions, exhibiting the desired adhesion properties, can in particular be obtained without adding tackifying resin. In fact, in order to impart sufficient tack properties to the compositions based on non-silicone elastomers, it is generally required to introduce a tackifying resin. The presence of such a resin imparts, to the touch, a drier and therefore less soft and more aggressive tack resulting in poorer conformability and very high adhesion. Adding a resin can, moreover, cause the whole composition to be unstable.
More precisely, it has been discovered, and this constitutes the basis of the present invention, that compositions employing at least one specific triblock elastomeric copolymer, of the styrene—saturated olefin—styrene type, and at least one polymer of the polyisobutene type having a very low molecular weight, in a predetermined amount by weight, make it possible to produce elastomeric matrices exhibiting improved adhesive properties, similar to those obtained with silicone elastomers.
The invention thus also covers an elastomeric matrix obtained by means of a composition as described above.
The elastomeric matrices of the invention can be obtained from a conventional manufacturing process. They can be sterilized by radiation unlike matrices using silicone adhesives.
Once applied, the obtained elastomeric matrices, which can be implemented in various adhesive devices such as for example dressings, are easy to handle, are repositionable, allow painless removal when applied onto the skin, mucous membranes or skin appendages, and exhibit satisfactory holding over time.
Thus, according to a first aspect, the present invention relates to a composition comprising:
According to a second aspect, the present invention relates to a composition comprising:
In particular, according to a preferred embodiment of the first and second aspects of the invention, the composition further comprises 0.05 to 0.4% by weight of an antioxidant, the percentages being expressed by weight, relative to the total weight of the composition. The antioxidant agent makes it possible to have a stable composition over time.
According to a third aspect, the present invention relates to an elastomeric matrix obtained from such a composition and a dressing comprising said elastomeric matrix.
Styrene—Saturated Olefin—Styrene Triblock Copolymer
The composition according to the invention comprises at least one triblock block copolymer of the ABA type (styrene—saturated olefin—styrene).
The block copolymers used in the context of the invention are triblock copolymers of the ABA type comprising two styrene end blocks A (non-elastomeric blocks, glassy at use temperature, in particular thermoplastic) and a saturated olefin central block B (elastomeric block). They are in particular prepared by anionic or radical polymerization techniques. The triblock copolymers can assume various structures: linear, star-shaped (also called radial), branched or even comb-shaped.
For the sake of simplicity, in the present description, the polymeric blocks constituting the abovementioned copolymers are designated by the nature of their recurring units. Thus, the expression “block” or “styrene A block” denotes a poly(styrene) block and the expression “block” or “saturated olefin block” denotes a poly(saturated olefin) block.
The blocks A are therefore non-elastomeric styrenic (or polystyrenic) blocks.
The blocks B of saturated olefins can for example be:
According to a preferred embodiment, the blocks B are ethylene-butylene, ethylene-propylene or ethylene-ethylene-propylene blocks. The preferred block copolymers are thus selected from polystyrene-poly(ethylene-butylene)-polystyrene (SEBS), polystyrene-poly(ethylene-propylene)-polystyrene (SEPS) and polystyrene-poly(ethylene-ethylene-propylene)-polystyrene (SEEPS).
In the framework of the present invention, the triblock copolymers SEBS, SEPS or SEEPS having a styrene content of between 10 and 45% by weight, preferably between 10 and 35% by weight, relative to the weight of said SEBS, SEPS or SEEPS copolymer, will be preferred.
The saturated central block triblock copolymers are well known to the person skilled in the art and are, for example, marketed:
According to a preferred embodiment, the styrene—saturated olefin—styrene triblock copolymer according to the invention has a viscosity measured in a 5% (mass/mass) solution in toluene at 30° C., between 0.01 and 1 Pa·s.
Among the copolymers which have a viscosity of between 0.01 and 1 Pa·s measured in a 5% solution, mention may be made of the copolymers marketed by the company KRATON under the grades KRATON® G1651 and KRATON® G1654 and the copolymers marketed by the KURARAY company under SEPTON® grades 4055, 4077, 4044 or 4099.
Mention may also be made of the copolymers marketed by the company Dynasol under the grades Calprène® H 6140 and Calprène® H6144 or by the company TSRC under the grades Taipol® 6151 and Taipol® 6154 and the copolymers marketed by the company KURARAY.
According to another preferred embodiment, the styrene—saturated olefin—styrene triblock copolymer according to the invention has a viscosity measured in a 15% (mass/mass) solution in toluene at 30° C., between 0.01 and 0.5 Pa·s.
Among the copolymers which have a viscosity measured in a 15% solution of between 0.01 and 0.5 Pa·s, mention may be made of the copolymers sold by the company KRATON® under the grades KRATON® G1650, KRATON® G1657 and KRATON® G1652, KRATON® G1726, and the copolymers marketed by the company KURARAY under the grades SEPTON® 8076 or 4033. Mention may also be made of the copolymers marketed by the company TSRC under the Taipol® 6150 or 6152 grades.
These viscosities are measured using a Brookfield LVI model viscometer in a solution in toluene at 5% or 15% mass/mass depending on the molecular weight of the copolymer.
Preferably, the styrene—saturated olefin—styrene triblock copolymer used in the framework of the present invention is a polystyrene-poly(ethylene-ethylene-propylene)-polystyrene (SEEPS) such as preferably Septon® 4055 or a polystyrene-poly(ethylene-butylene)-polystyrene (SEBS), such as preferably KRATON® G1654 or Calprène® H6144 and H6140.
In general, the amount of styrene—saturated olefin—styrene triblock copolymer in the composition is between 2.5 and 20% by weight, preferably between 4 and 12% by weight, preferably between 6 and 10% by weight, relative to the total weight of the composition.
Beside the styrene—saturated olefin—styrene triblock copolymer, the composition according to the invention can also comprise a diblock copolymer. Preferably, the diblock copolymer has the general formula AB in which A and B are as previously defined.
In the context of the invention, it is preferred to use a mixture of a triblock copolymer and of a diblock copolymer having the same blocks A and/or B, in particular because such mixtures are directly available commercially and guarantee a better miscibility of the mixture.
According to a preferred variant, the content in diblock copolymer in the mixture of styrenic triblock/diblock copolymers is of between 30 and 95% by weight, relative to the total weight of the mixture of styrenic triblock/diblock copolymers.
In particular, the mixture of diblock/triblock copolymer exhibits a controlled final level of triblocks/diblocks. Such a combination has the advantage of achieving a composition exhibiting better dissipation capacity and therefore better adhesiveness. Dissipation is the property of irreversible deformation of the adhesive layer. As it is deformed, this type of adhesive consumes energy which is dissipated in the deformation. It is this property which makes it possible in particular to have good adhesion, in the sense that a significant amount of energy is required to obtain this deformation which is not stored by the adhesive layer.
Among the mixtures of diblock/triblock copolymer known to the person skilled in the art, mention may be made, by way of example, of Kraton® G1726, the styrene content of which is 30%, or Kraton® G1657 sold by the company KRATON, the styrene content of which is 13%.
In particular, the amount of styrene—saturated olefin diblock copolymer in the composition is between 1 and 10% by weight, preferably between 2 and 6% by weight, preferably between 2.5 and 5% by weight, relative to the total weight of the composition.
According to a particular embodiment, the styrenic triblock/diblock copolymers are present in the composition in a triblock/diblock ratio of between 1 and 3, preferably between 1.5 and 2.
Polyisobutene
Polyisobutene (PIB) is a saturated homopolymer, having a low reactivity (low oxidability), derived from the isobutylene monomer. This polyolefin has the repeat unit -[CH2-C(CH3)2]n—.
PIBs result from the cationic copolymerization of isobutylene (H2C═C(CH3)2, monounsaturated comonomer) with isoprene (H2C═C(CH3)—CH═CH2, conjugated diene). The reaction is carried out in solution in chloromethane at −95° C. in the presence of aluminum chloride (AlCl3). Polymer chains contain about 1 to 2% isoprene units (cis and trans). The linkage in 1,4 of the diene leaves a double bond (unsaturation).
For the purposes of the present invention, the term “very low molecular weight PIB” is understood as meaning PIB of which the number molecular weight is between 700 g.mol−1 and 3000 g.mol−1, preferably between 750 g.mol−1. 1 and 1500 g.mol−1, more preferably between 800 g.mol−1 and 1400 g.mol−1, even more preferably between 850 g.mol−1 and 1300 g.mol−1, more preferably between 900 g.mol−1 and 1200 g.mol−1.
The number molecular weight of the PIB is measured by size exclusion chromatography according to the following method:
The PIBs which may be used in the context of the present invention are well known to the person skilled in the art and available commercially, for example under the following trade names:
In the context of the present invention, the PIB is preferably contained in an amount of 45 to 97.5% of PIB by weight, relative to the total weight of the composition.
Ideally, the PIB content in the composition is of between 50 and 60% by weight relative to the total weight of the composition. When the amount of PIB is increased, the tack is increased, but the cohesion is decreased.
Plasticizer
According to a particular embodiment, and in particular when the method for manufacturing the elastomeric matrix is carried out via the molten route, the styrene—saturated olefin—styrene triblock copolymer, and the PIB present in the composition according to the invention are associated with at least one plasticizer.
The plasticizers which may be used are well known and intended to improve the stretching, flexibility, extrudability or implementation properties of the styrene-saturated olefin-styrene triblock copolymer. For this purpose, one or several plasticizers can be used if necessary.
In general, as plasticizers, liquid compounds compatible with the central saturated olefin block of the abovementioned block copolymers will be preferred.
Among the plasticizer compounds which may be used in the compositions according to the invention, mention will in particular be made of oils, preferably mineral oils.
Alternatively, it is also possible to use synthetic products based on liquid mixtures of saturated hydrocarbons, for example the products marketed by the company TOTAL under the name GEMSEAL® and in particular the product GEMSEAL® 60 which is an isoparaffinic mixture obtained from a fully hydrogenated petroleum fraction.
In the context of the present invention, use will preferably be made of plasticizing oils and in particular mineral oils formed from paraffinic or naphthenic compounds, or from mixtures thereof, in variable proportions.
Particularly preferred plasticizing mineral oils are formed from mixtures of paraffinic and naphthenic compounds, and in particular such mixtures in which the proportion of compounds of paraffinic nature is predominant.
Among the plasticizing oils which are particularly suitable, mention may be made of the oil marketed by the company PETRO CANADA under the reference PURETOL® 9D or the BLANDOL® and RUDOL® oils marketed by Sonneborn or also the Pionier® 2076P oil or the Pionier® 7860 oil marketed by Hansen & Rosenthal.
Besides oils, the plasticizer can include petroleum jelly. The petroleum jelly used in the compositions of the invention is a petroleum jelly in compliance with the French Pharmacopoeia (in French: Pharmacopée Française) available commercially. By way of example, mention may be made of the Codex A® Vaseline marketed by Aiglon.
In the context of the present invention, the plasticizer is contained in an amount of 30 to 70%, preferably 30 to 50%, more preferably 33 to 40% by weight, relative to the total weight of the composition.
Hydrocolloids
According to an embodiment of the invention, the compositions according to the invention may comprise hydrocolloid particles.
These particles, when used in an elastomeric matrix intended to come into contact with the skin or the wound, allow painless removal and the maintaining a moist environment at the level of the wound in order to promote cicatrization.
To this end, a small number of hydrophilic particles of a hydrocolloid is thus either deposited on the surface of the elastomeric matrix once the latter has been formed or, preferably, dispersed homogeneously within the composition according to the invention.
By “hydrocolloid” or “hydrocolloid particles” is meant herein any compound usually used by the person skilled in the art for its ability to absorb aqueous liquids such as water, physiological serum or wound exudates.
As suitable hydrocolloids, mention may be made, for example, of pectin, alginates, natural plant gums such as in particular Karaya gum, cellulose derivatives such as carboxymethylcelluloses (such as, for example, BLANOSE® 7H4XFPH marketed by Ashland) and their alkali metal salts such as with sodium or calcium, as well as synthetic polymers based on acrylic acid salts, known under the name “superabsorbents”, such as for example the products marketed by the company CIBA Specialty Chemicals under the name SALCARE® SC91 as well as mixtures of these compounds.
Certain of these superabsorbents qualified as “microcolloids” because they have a particle size of less than 10 micrometers can of course also be used.
The preferred hydrocolloids in the context of the present invention are the alkali metal salts of carboxymethylcellulose, and in particular sodium carboxymethylcellulose (CMC).
The size of the hydrocolloid particles, for example measured by laser grain size, is generally between 50 and 100 μm, advantageously in the order of 80 μm.
Generally, the amount of hydrocolloid particles incorporated into the composition according to the invention will advantageously be less than or equal to 25% by weight, advantageously from 2 to 20% by weight, preferably from 5 to 18% by weight, more preferably from 10 to 15% by weight, relative to the total weight of said composition.
If the hydrocolloid particles are placed on the surface of the elastomeric matrix once the latter has been formed, their amount will preferably be in the order of 1 to 10% by weight, and more particularly of 2 to 5% by weight, relative to the total weight of said elastomeric matrix.
Antioxidants
The composition according to the invention can also comprise antioxidant agents.
The term “antioxidant agents” is herein meant to designate the compounds commonly used by the person skilled in the art to ensure the stability of the compounds entering into the formulation of the compositions, in particular with respect to oxygen, heat, ozone or ultraviolet radiation.
As examples of appropriate antioxidants, mention may in particular be made of phenolic antioxidants, such as in particular the products sold by the company BASF under the names IRGANOX® 1010, IRGANOX® 565, IRGANOX® 1076.
In general, these antioxidants can be used alone or in combination in an amount in the order of 0.05 to 1% by weight, preferably from 0.05 to 0.4% by weight, relative to the total weight of the composition.
In the context of the present invention, the use of the IRGANOX® 1010 product will be preferred in an amount of between 0.05 and 0.4% by weight, relative to the total weight of the composition.
Additional Active Ingredients
The composition according to the invention may also comprise one (or several) other active substance(s) making it possible to induce or accelerate cicatrization or which may have a favorable role in the treatment of skin or of a wound.
Among these active substances, mention may be made, in particular, by way of examples:
These active agents may be used in an amount in the order of 0.01 to 20% by weight, preferably from 1 to 15% by weight, and more preferably from 2 to 10% by weight, relative to the total weight of the composition.
The presence of hydrocolloids within the composition promotes the release of those active agents.
Of course, the composition according to the invention can also comprise one or several other compounds known for their action in the debridement phase, such as for example:
Adjuvants
As adjuvants which can be used in the compositions according to the invention, mention may be made of compounds known to promote releasing of active agents, such as for example the Montanox® 80 or Sepinov® EMT 10 products which are commonly used in URGOTUL® products which incorporate active agents.
These adjuvants may be used in an amount in the order of 1 to 15% by weight, relative to the total weight of the composition.
According to a preferred embodiment, the composition according to the invention consists of:
According to another preferred embodiment, the composition according to the invention consists of:
In particular, the compositions according to the invention are free from tackifying resins. By free from tackifying resin is meant, within the meaning of the present application, that the composition comprises less than 0.5% by weight of tackifying resin, in particular less than 0.05% by weight, and more preferably less than 0.005% by weight.
Among the tackifying resins, mention may be made of modified terpene or polyterpene resins, rosin resins, hydrocarbon resins, mixtures of cyclic, aromatic and aliphatic resins.
For example, these may be commercial products such as:
According to a preferred embodiment, the compositions according to the invention are free from silicone elastomers. By free from silicone elastomers is meant, within the meaning of the present application, that the composition comprises less than 0.1% by weight of silicone elastomers, in particular less than 0.01% by weight, and more preferably less than 0.001% by weight.
Method for Preparing the Compositions
The compositions according to the invention can be prepared by any technique known to the person skilled in the art.
According to a preferred embodiment, the compositions according to the invention can be prepared by the “solvent” route or by the “molten” route.
By solvent route is meant, within the meaning of the present application, any method consisting in dissolving the styrene—saturated olefin—styrene triblock copolymer in a suitable solvent, said solvent being removed by evaporation at the end of the process for preparing the composition.
By “molten route” is meant any process consisting in melting the styrene—saturated olefin—styrene triblock copolymer in order to produce the mixture of the composition constituents. Preferably, the mixture is produced in a mixer or a kneader.
In the context of the present invention:
According to a preferred embodiment, when the process for preparing the composition is carried out via the “solvent” route, the composition according to the invention consists of:
According to another preferred embodiment, when the process for preparing the composition is carried out via the “molten” route, the composition according to the invention consists of:
Elastomeric Matrix:
An object of the present invention is also an elastomeric matrix obtained from a composition as described above.
In particular, the elastomeric matrix is obtained by forming a thin layer, that is to say having a thickness of 50 μm to 1 mm, preferably of 150 μm to 400 μm by calendering, or by hot casting of said composition, according to processes well known the person skilled in the art. The elastomeric matrix can be coated on a support so as to form an openwork deposit (in French: dépôt ajouré) or not. Thus, when the elastomeric matrix is intended to be applied onto the skin or onto a wound, the matrix can advantageously be coated so as to form an openwork deposit in order to achieve the desired permeability.
The elastomeric matrices obtained in the context of the present invention exhibiting improved adhesive properties, similar to those obtained with silicone elastomers.
In particular, the elastomeric matrices according to the invention exhibit a loop tack of at least 15 cN.cm−1.
Loop tack measurement is used to assess the force required to tear off a self-adhesive product from card stock at a temperature of 23° C.±2° C. and a relative humidity of 50%±15%.
It is carried out according to the following protocol, implemented in examples of the present application:
Elastomeric matrices are produced from the compositions to be tested using a hydraulic press according to the following protocol:
The 2 plates of the hydraulic press were preheated to 90° C. On the lower plate of the press, a polyurethane (PU) film and a polypropylene non-woven were deposited, complexed with a paper liner (the polypropylene nonwoven face being arranged opposed to the lower plate, the paper being on the plate side). About 3,5 g of one of the described compositions were deposited on this face and the latter composition was covered with a siliconized polyester film (the siliconized side being placed in contact with the composition). Two 0.25 mm wedges were placed between the polyester and the non-woven at the ends of the lower plate of the press and the assembly was subjected to a pressure of 200 bars and to a temperature in the order of 90 to 100° C.
The matrices produced thereby were allowed to cool and their thicknesses were checked with a micrometer so as to obtain a model whose thickness is in the order of 210 to 260 μm without the silicone polyester.
A 20-cm long and 2-cm wide strip is cut. A loop is made with the adhesive on the outside.
The ends of the loop are fixed into the upper jaw of the dynamometer so that the loop measures 18 cm from the jaw. The end of the jaw is placed 140 mm from the card stock and the dynamometer is lowered from 80 mm to 300 mm.min−1 so that the adhesive of the loop is in contact with the card stock (on full width), fixed horizontally in the lower jaw.
After waiting for 5 seconds, the dynamometer is brought up to 300 mm.min−1, while recording the force necessary for complete peel off of the buckle.
According to another particular embodiment, the elastomeric matrices according to the invention exhibit a shear strength of at least 7 N, preferably of at least 13 N.
The purpose of measuring shear strength is to characterize the cohesion of the matrix, by measuring its strength when it is subjected to a linear shear phenomenon. It is carried out on elastomeric matrices obtained using a hydraulic press according to the following protocol, the operating conditions of which are detailed as an example:
The 2 plates of the hydraulic press were preheated. A silicone polyester film was deposited on the lower plate of the press (the siliconized side being disposed opposed to the lower plate). About 20 g of one of the described compositions were deposited on this face and the latter composition was covered with a non-stick plastic film, for example a siliconized—fluorinated polyester film (the siliconized—fluorinated face being placed in contact with the composition). Two 1.2 mm wedges were placed between the 2 polyester films at the ends of the lower plate of the press and the assembly was subjected to a pressure of 200 bars and to a temperature in the order of 90 to 100° C.
For the shear strength measurement, the plates thereby produced were allowed to cool down, and their thicknesses were checked with a micrometer so as to obtain a model whose composition thickness is approximately one mm, between 0.98 mm and 1.08 mm.
The elastomeric matrices according to the invention exhibit a loop tack of at least 15 cN.cm−1 and a shear strength of at least 7 N, preferably at least 13 N.
Of course, the particular embodiments which have just been described can be implemented separately or according to any one of their combinations.
The compositions according to the invention make it possible in particular to produce elastomeric matrices exhibiting acceptable adhesiveness and painless removal when they are applied to the skin, the wound, the mucous membrane or the skin appendages.
The present invention is illustrated in the non-limiting examples presented below.
Preparation of the Compositions
The compositions of Examples 1 to 13 were prepared using the following constituents in the proportions, expressed as a percentage by weight, mentioned in Table 1 below.
Elastomer:
Poly(styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene) block copolymer (abbreviated SEBS):
Mixture of poly(styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene) triblock block copolymer (abbreviated SEBS) and poly(styrene-ethylene-butylene) diblock block copolymer (abbreviated SEB):
Poly(styrene-ethylene-ethylene/propylene-styrene) block copolymer (abbreviated SEEPS):
Plasticizer:
Antioxidant: IRGANOX® 1010 marketed by BASF.
Very Low Molecular Weight PIB:
Manufacture of the Composition Via the Molten Route:
In a vertical mixer, the plasticizer and the PIB were successively introduced at a set temperature of 80° C. and stirred until a homogeneous mixture was obtained. The copolymer(s) and the antioxidant were then introduced while stirring, then the set temperature was brought to 150° C. and stirring was performed until a homogeneous mixture was obtained.
It was then allowed to cool, then the mixer was emptied.
Subsequently, elastomeric matrices were produced from the compositions to be tested (compositions 1 to 13), by applying high pressure using a hydraulic press according to the following protocol:
The 2 plates of the hydraulic press were preheated to 90° C. On the lower plate of the press a polyurethane (PU) film and a polypropylene non-woven were deposited (the polypropylene non-woven face being disposed opposed to the lower plate). About 3,5 g of one of the described compositions were deposited on this face and the latter composition was covered with a siliconized polyester film (the siliconized side being placed in contact with the composition). Two 0.25 mm wedges were placed between the 2 polyester films at the ends of the lower plate of the press and the assembly was subjected to a pressure of 200 bars and to a temperature in the order of 90 to 100° C.
The matrices produced thereby were allowed to cool, the paper liner located on the PU film on the face opposed to the nonwoven was removed, and their thicknesses were checked with a micrometer so as to obtain a model whose thickness is in the order of 210 to 260 μm without the silicone polyester.
Manufacture of Compositions 14 and 15 Via the Solvent Route:
In a beaker, an amount of toluene equivalent to 5 times the amount of dry matter was introduced for complete dissolution of the polymers and copolymers and obtaining a clear diluted final solution. The polymer is introduced first and after dissolution thereof, the copolymer is introduced. Both are cut up into small pieces before introduction into toluene. The amounts of copolymer and of PIB appearing in [Table 1] below, and the geometry of the mold make it possible to define in particular the thickness of the film necessary for the subsequent analyzes. In order to ensure the total dissolution of the solid phases, the mixture is stirred with a magnetic stirrer and a bar magnet throughout the operation at a medium speed ensuring active mixing without splashing. The dissolution phase is carried out at room temperature for a maximum of 12 hours and under a hood.
After this dissolution phase, the stirring is stopped and the beaker content is poured into a mold provided with a non-stick Teflon-like coating. A perforated aluminum film is then placed onto the Teflon mold. This mold is placed in a laminar flow hood, at room temperature, for the solvent to evaporate. After 24 hours under these conditions, the mold is placed for 1 hour at 90° C. in a ventilated enclosure. The mold is then placed at room temperature for 2 hours. The polymer film is then recovered. It allows the making of samples for different characterizations.
Measurement of Adhesive Strength at 180°:
The purpose of this method is to measure the force required to peel off a support by peeling at 180°, a material coated with a pressure sensitive adhesive at a given speed v after a given contact time t at a temperature of 23° C.±2° C. and at a relative humidity of 50%±15%.
The matrices obtained by means of the compositions according to Examples 1 to 12 are applied onto a support as described above and then cut up using a punch in order to obtain test pieces having a width I=20 mm.
A strip of Exacompta 13356E stock card having a length and width greater than the test piece is cut.
The test piece is applied, with a slight finger pressure onto the card stock parallel to the longest dimension thereof, without stretching the strip and avoiding the inclusion of air bubbles. Two back and forth movements are then carried out using an applicator roller (with a diameter of 85 mm covered with a 6-mm thick rubber coating and with a mass of 500 g) at a speed v1=10 mm.s−1 and a weight P=2 kg.cm−1, without additional pressure, so as to obtain close contact between the adhesive matrix and the paper surface.
Immediately afterwards, the adhesiveness measurement is carried out by positioning the card stock strip against a plate, the whole being held in the lower jaw of an electronic dynamometer and the peeling measurement is taken at 180° at the speed v2=300 mm.min−1.
The Adhesive Strength PA=F/I with:
I=test piece width in cm
F=force measured in N.
In the context of the invention, a PA>10 cN.cm−1 is preferred.
Loop Tack Measurement
This method is used to assess the force required to tear off a self-adhesive product from card stock at a temperature of 23° C.±2° C. and a relative humidity of 50%±15%.
A 20 cm by 2 cm strip is cut. A loop is made with the adhesive on the outside. The ends of the loop are fixed into the upper jaw of the dynamometer so that the loop measures 18 cm from the jaw. The end of the jaw is placed 140 mm from the card stock and the dynamometer is lowered from 80 mm to 300 mm.min−1 so that the adhesive of the loop is in contact with the card stock (on full width), fixed horizontally in the lower jaw.
After waiting for 5 seconds, the dynamometer is brought up to 300 mm.min−1, while recording the force necessary for complete peel off of the buckle.
The elastomeric matrices according to the invention exhibit a loop tack of at least 15 cN.cm−1.
Shear Strength Measurement
Subsequently, polymeric matrices were produced from the compositions to be tested, by applying high pressure using a hydraulic press according to the following protocol:
The 2 plates of the hydraulic press were preheated. A silicone polyester film was deposited on the lower plate of the press (the siliconized side being disposed opposed to the lower plate). About 20 g of one of the described compositions were deposited on this face and the latter composition was covered with a non-stick plastic film, for example a siliconized—fluorinated polyester film (the siliconized—fluorinated face being placed in contact with the composition). Two 1.2 mm wedges were placed between the 2 polyester films at the ends of the lower plate of the press and the assembly was subjected to a pressure of 200 bars and to a temperature in the order of 90 to 100° C.
The plates thereby produced were allowed to cool down, and their thicknesses were checked with a micrometer so as to obtain a model whose composition thickness is approximately one mm, between 0.98 mm and 1.08 mm.
The purpose of this method is to characterize the strength of certain materials when they are subjected to a linear shear phenomenon.
Sampling and/or Conditioning
Number of samples≥3
Sample conditioning for at least 24 hours at 23° C.±2° C. and 50%±15% Relative Humidity.
Procedure
Preparation of Test Pieces:
Glue the retaining material onto one end of the first metal plate so that it covers the metal plate over a length L=20 mm.
Then press to properly adhere the retaining material and cut up the excess material flush with the metal plate.
Repeat the operation onto the second metal plate (length of the retaining material identical to the first plate).
Cut up a strip of the sample to be tested (1 mm thick) of width I=25 mm (width identical to that of the metal plates).
Glue the sample to be tested onto the retaining material of a metal plate, then cut up the excess of the sample strip flush with the metal plate so that the sample to be tested is indeed of length L=20 mm, and glue onto the sample the area with the retaining material of the second metal plate.
Measurement:
Mark the metal plates at the metal/sample limit
Apply a weight onto the area to be tested (20×25 mm area):
Test the Test Piece:
Expression of Results:
The result is expressed in the form of the strength required for the test piece to fail in N (within 10−1).
The elastomeric matrices according to the invention exhibit a shear strength of at least 7 N, preferably of at least 13 N.
The elastomeric matrices according to the invention exhibit a loop tack of at least 15 cN.cm−1, their shear strength is of at least 7 N, preferably at least 13 N.
The matrices obtained by means of the compositions of Examples 1 to 4 (comparative examples) do not include very low molecular weight PIB. These matrices are deceptive because they are not sticky on the skin.
The matrices obtained by means of the compositions of Examples 5 to 12 are matrices according to the invention. The skin-holding of these matrices has been tested.
The matrix obtained, resulting from Example 13, formulated with a PIB having a low molecular weight (18000 g.mol−1) and not a very low molecular weight (lower than 3000 g.mol−1) as used in the present invention is a cold liquid matrix. Thus, it is demonstrated that the matrices known from the prior art using low molecular weight PIBs differ from the matrices of the present invention.
Ideally, the PIB content in the composition is 55% by weight relative to the total weight of the composition. When the amount of PIB is increased, the tack is increased, but the cohesion is decreased.
Examples 5 to 12 were tested on the skin. The matrices were coated as for the adhesive strength measurement.
4 cm * 1 cm test pieces were then cut up. These test pieces were applied onto the forearm by applying the hand at a pressure of approximately 5 to 15 mmHg.
The arm is then returned to the horizontal (the test piece thus being directed towards the ground) in order to check how the test piece holds.
None of the test pieces coated with the matrices of Examples 5 to 12 fell off.
The test piece is then repositioned twice (the test piece is removed and then applied by applying the hand at a pressure of about 5 to 15 mmHg both times).
The arm is returned to the horizontal. None of the test pieces coated with the matrices of Examples 5 to 12 fell off.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| FR1908878 | Aug 2019 | FR | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/FR2020/051403 | 7/30/2020 | WO |
