Patent Grant
9388325
The surfaces of objects that are exposed to the environment come into contact with a variety of agents, including dust, moisture, water, and oils. In industrial applications, surfaces may be exposed to a variety of agents in addition to water, such as aqueous salt solutions, solutions of aqueous acid or base, and chemical components that may be dissolved or suspended in aqueous compositions or other liquids, including those used in manufacturing processes. Not only are the surfaces of objects exposed to a variety of chemical agents, but the temperatures to which the surfaces are exposed can also affect their interaction with those agents and the performance of the coated surfaces of objects. For example, freezing liquids, such as water, can result in frozen deposits tightly attached to the surfaces that prevent access to the surfaces and in some instances prevent proper operation of equipment bound by the frozen liquid. In addition, elevated temperatures can accelerate processes such as corrosion or leaching.
Embodiments of coatings and surface treatments are provided herein that can provide advantageous surface properties including, but not limited to, hydrophobicity or superhydrophobicity (collectively HP), oleophobicity or superoleophobicity (collectively OP), and resistance to ice formation, adherence and/or accumulation. Embodiments of the coatings described herein that are HP and OP, and which may also display anti-icing behavior, may be applied to a surface using two or more steps. Embodiments of methods of applying such coatings and surface treatments also are provided, together with embodiments of compositions for applying such coatings and surface treatments, and surfaces and/or objects so treated and coated are provided as well.
Embodiments of elastomeric coating methods, compositions, and treatments are provided that impart a variety of desirable characteristics to objects and their surfaces, including hydrophobicity (including superhydrophobicity), oleophobicity (including superoleophobicity), and/or anti-icing. As used herein, the term “hydrophobicity” and the abbreviation HP includes superhydrophobicity, and the term “oleophobicity” and the abbreviation OP includes superoleophobicity. The abbreviation “HP/OP” is used collectively herein to mean HP and/or OP and may also include anti-icing properties (including ice formation, adherence and/or accumulation). Treating surfaces with coatings having HP/OP characteristics can result in objects and surfaces with a variety of advantageous properties including, but not limited to, resistance to wetting, corrosion, swelling, rotting, cracking or warping, exfoliation, fouling, dust and/or dirt accumulation on surfaces (self cleaning), and resistance to surface ice formation, adherence and/or accumulation. Not only do embodiments of the coating compositions and treatments described herein provide properties including HP/OP, but the coatings also are durable in that they substantially retain those properties despite some amount of mechanical abrasion. In addition to providing durable HP/OP behavior, embodiments of the elastomeric coatings can also remain flexible and provide substantial resistance to cracking, peeling, and delamination from the coated surface over a wide range of temperatures. Further, embodiments of the coatings can readily be repaired where the surface has been abraded sufficiently to compromise the coating's properties including HP/OP behavior.
Embodiments of the HP/OP elastomeric coatings described herein may be applied in a process comprising two or more steps in which the first component applied comprises an elastomeric binding agent and optionally comprises first particles. Once applied, the coating formed by the first component is termed a “substrate coating,” a “base coating,” or a “base coat” particularly when dried. Following the application of the elastomer base coat, an amount of second component is applied to the base coat. The second component comprises second particles that are treated to cause the second particles, and the coatings into which they are suitably incorporated, to display advantageous properties including HP/OP and/or anti-icing behavior. The second component may be applied to an elastomeric base coat after the base coat is applied, but before it is dried and/or set. Alternatively, depending on the carrier/solvent used with the second component, the second component may be applied to the elastomer after the base coat is dried and/or set.
The use of second component coating compositions comprising solvents that can be applied to the elastomeric base coat after it has dried and set permits repair of coatings that have been abraded or otherwise damaged to the point where the desired HP/OP properties is/are no longer observed. Provided the base coat is intact, or the base coat has not been damaged to the point that material underlying the base coat is exposed, repair is accomplished by the reapplication of the second component which comprises second particles.
Where the HP/OP elastomeric coatings have been abraded so as to compromise the elastomer binder coating or its properties (e.g., abraded, worn too thin, or damaged to the point where the surface of the coated object or underlying material such as a primer is exposed), the coating may be reapplied to the abraded area (i.e., it may be repaired) by repeating the application of both the first and second components. Suitable repair/preparation of exposed/damaged surfaces and/or underlying primers may be required prior to the reapplication of the elastomeric coating. In contrast, other HP or OP coatings using non-elastomeric binder systems (e.g., polyurethane systems) may not be as readily repaired because the HP/OP behavior of the original coating that remains in place can prevent newly applied coating compositions from binding to the surface.
In one embodiment, a method of applying a HP/OP coating to a substrate comprises the steps of:
In some embodiments of the application method, the base coating is treated with the second component after drying and curing the base coating at room temperature (e.g., about 18 to about 23° C.) or at an elevated temperature (e.g., about 30° to about 100° C., about 30° to about 60° C., about 50° to about 100° C., or about 40° to about 90° C.). In other embodiments, the solvent used to apply the base coat is allowed to evaporate until the coating is no longer liquid and cannot be removed by contact (i.e., dry to the touch); however, the base coating is not fully dried and cured when treated with the second component containing second particles. In still other embodiments, the composition comprising second particles may be applied directly to the base coat before solvents used in the application of the base coating have fully, substantially, or partly evaporated.
Diverse elastomeric binders, first particles, and second particles may be employed in the methods and compositions described herein. In some embodiments, first particles may be filler particles. In some embodiments second particles may be considered nanoparticles. In some embodiments described herein, the coating formed by the application of the first and second components will be nearly transparent to visible light. In other embodiments, the coatings may be colored but nearly transparent to visible light that is not absorbed by the coating components and/or colorants. In still other embodiments, the coatings will have colorants (e.g., insoluble pigments or colored first and/or second particles) that will render them opaque or block the transmission of light. Embodiments of such coating components, materials, and compositions are described more fully below.
A skilled artisan will readily understand that the selection of first particles and second particles needs to include consideration of not only the desired properties of the coating and the ultimate conditions to which the coating will be subject in use, but also the process used to prepare the coating. Where, for example, particles must withstand elevated temperatures or specific solvents in the coating process, they should be selected so as to be suitable for use in the required temperature ranges or in the required solvents. For example, in those embodiments where coatings or the first and/or second particles are intended for use at elevated temperatures (e.g., above room temperature), the particles need to be compatible with the elevated temperatures that the coatings will be subjected to when in use and/or in processes employed to prepare the coatings. Similarly, the particles should be selected to be compatible with solvents used in the application process and with solvents the coatings will become exposed to in use.
In methods described herein, where second particles are applied to a base coat on a substrate, which may be coated with a primer, the methods can produce coatings having (i) a surface in contact with said substrate (or primer) and (ii) an exposed surface that is not in contact with the substrate (or primer) where these surfaces bear different amounts of first particles, second particles, or both first and second particles. In some embodiments the exposed surface can have a greater amount of first and/or second particles on, at, or adjacent to the exposed surface, compared to the amount of first and/or second particles at or adjacent to the surface of the coating that is in contact with the substrate (or primer). In one embodiment the coatings have a greater amount of second particles on, at, or adjacent to the exposed surface than the surface of the coating that is in contact with the substrate (or primer). In embodiments where a greater amount of first and/or second particles may be present at the exposed surface, the coatings may be considered composite coatings.
The amount of particles in any portion of a coating may be assessed by any means known in the art including, but not limited to, microscopy or electron microscopy. Using those techniques on cross or oblique sections of coatings, the amount (e.g., the number) of particles can be determined. In addition, where it is possible to remove coatings, or where the substrate permits (e.g., it is transparent), the surfaces can be examined directly using microscopy or electron microscopy to determine the amount of particles present at the exposed surface or adjacent to the substrate.
Embodiments of the coatings described herein are durable in that they can withstand some amount of abrasion without a substantial loss of HP/OP properties. To provide an endpoint for the loss of superhydrophobic (SH) behavior as a result of abrasion testing, substantially planar abraded surfaces are tested for their propensity to shed water droplets at an indicated angle of incline (5 degrees unless indicated otherwise). Typically, twenty droplets are placed on the surface to be assessed, which is inclined at the desired angle. The end of SH behavior is indicated when more than half (ten or more drops) stay in place. While such measurements provide a consistent endpoint, a skilled artisan will understand that, even when the endpoint is reached, the abraded surfaces may still be quite hydrophobic, e.g., having water contact angles greater than 130° or 140° in many instances.
Resistance to abrasion may be measured using any method known in the art including, but not limited to, mechanized or manual assessment with a Taber abrasion-testing instrument (e.g., a Taber “Abraser”) or a Crockmeter. Alternatively, a manual measure used to assess the durability of surfaces is a glove rub (GR) test. Each of those tests is described in more detail below.
For the purpose of this application, wherever Taber testing results are recited, the tests are conducted on a Taber Model 503 instrument using CS-0 or CS10 wheels with 250 g or 1,000 g loads as indicated. Unless indicated otherwise, a load of 1,000 g was employed, and tests were conducted at room temperature at a speed of 95 rpm.
Where resistance to the loss of HP is measured with a Crockmeter, a motorized American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC) CM-5 Crockmeter is employed. The finger of the Crockmeter is fitted with a 14/20 white rubber septum having an outside diameter of 13 mm and an inside diameter of 7 mm with a contact surface area of 94 mm2 (Ace Glass, Inc., Vineland, N.J., Catalog No. 9096-244). The septum is brought into contact with the coating with a force of 9N (Newtons). The end of superhydrophobic behavior is judged by the failure of more than half of the water droplets applied to the tested surface (typically 20 droplets) to run (roll) off when the surface is inclined at 5 degrees from horizontal. Abrasion resistance may also be measured using a manually operated AATCC Crockmeter.
Although an absolute correlation between Taber Abraser Testing, Crockmeter testing, and glove-rub testing is not provided, the manual glove-rub test is useful as an indication of the durability of the coated surface and its ability to be handled. Coatings applied to primed surfaces incorporating rigid particles (e.g., EXTENDO SPHERES) typically give a ratio of about 4.5 glove rubs/Taber Abraser cycles (250 g load) with CS-0 wheels and a ratio of about 7.5 glove rubs/Taber cycles with CS-10 wheels. Coatings incorporating flexible first particles (e.g., black rubber particles) typically give a ratio of about 7.6 glove rubs/Taber Abraser cycles (250 g load) with CS-0 wheels and a ratio of about 12.9 with CS-10 wheels. Results are given below for coatings of several thicknesses, where the thickness measurement includes the thickness of the primer layer. The number of strokes observed in Crockmeter testing is generally about one fourth of the number of “glove rubs” observed in the manual glove rub testing.
Nearly Transparent Coating with Clear Hollow Rigid Thermoplastic First Particles
Nontransparent Coating with Flexible Black Rubber First Particles
In addition to resisting the loss of HP/OP properties from abrasion, the compositions provided herein also provide durability in the form of resistance to other conditions. The coatings also resist loss of those properties when subject to:
The elastomer-based coatings described herein have a variety of properties in addition to resisting the loss of HP/OP from abrasion including, but not limited to, resisting ice formation and/or adherence on the coating and flexibility over a wide range of temperatures (e.g., −35° C. to 205° C.).
In one embodiment, the HP/OP elastomeric coatings comprising plastic, glass or rubber first particles (e.g., EXPANCEL spheres or micronized rubber) have a relative electrical permittivity at 100 MHz from about 0.2 to about 4 at about 22° C. (e.g., a permittivity from about 0.2 to about 1, from about 1 to about 2, from about 2 to about 3, or from about 3 to about 4) as measured by ASTM D150 using a single 0.11 mm thick film, or three layers of 0.11 mm film to achieve a 0.33 mm thickness.
In addition to their other properties, the HP/OP coatings described herein can be described by their characteristic roughness that may be measured by any means known in the art. In some embodiments, the surface roughness is measured using a Mahr Pocket Surf PS1 (Mahr Federal Inc., Providence, R.I.). The roughness of a surface can be expressed using a variety of mathematical expressions including, but not limited to, its Arithmetical Mean Roughness and its Ten-Point Mean Roughness.
The coatings resulting from the application of the compositions provided for herein have in some embodiments a surface with an arithmetical mean roughness in a range selected from: greater than about 3 microns to about 4 microns; from about 4 microns to about 6 microns; from about 4 microns to about 8 microns; from about 4 microns to about 12 microns; from about 4 microns to about 20 microns; from about 5 microns to about 10 microns; from about 5 microns to about 12 microns; from about 5 microns to about 20 microns; from about 6 microns to about 10 microns; or from about 6 microns to about 14 microns.
In other embodiments, the coatings, resulting from the application of the compositions provided for herein, have in some embodiments a surface with a ten point mean roughness selected from: from about 7 microns to about 60 microns; from about 7 microns to about 70 microns; from about 7 microns to about 80 microns; from about 7 microns to about 100 microns; from about 8 microns to about 60 microns; from about 8 microns to about 80 microns; from about 8 microns to about 100 microns; from about 12 microns to about 60 microns; from about 12 microns to about 100 microns; from about 15 microns to about 60 microns; or from about 15 microns to about 100 microns.
A more complete discussion of the coating compositions, their methods of preparation and application, and their properties follows. A skilled artisan will understand that the description and examples set forth herein are provided as guidance, and are not limiting to the scope of the methods and compositions described herein.
For the purposes of this disclosure, a HP material or surface is one that results in a water droplet forming a surface contact angle exceeding about 90° at room temperature (which is about 18° C. to about 23° C. for purposes of this disclosure). Similarly, for the purposes of this disclosure, a SH material or surface is one that results in a water droplet forming a surface contact angle exceeding 150° but less than the theoretical maximum contact angle of 180° at room temperature. As SH surface behavior encompasses water contact angles from about 150° to about 180°, SH behavior is considered to include what is sometimes referred to as “ultrahydrophobic” behavior. For the purpose of this disclosure the term hydrophobic (HP) shall include superhydrophobic (SH) behavior unless stated otherwise, and any and all embodiments, claims, and aspects of this disclosure reciting hydrophobic behavior may be limited to either hydrophobic behavior that is not superhydrophobic (contact angles from 90°-150°) or superhydrophobic behavior (contact angles of 150° or greater).
For the purposes of this disclosure an OP material or surface is one that results in a droplet of light mineral oil forming a surface contact angle exceeding about 90°. Similarly, for the purposes of this disclosure a SOP material or surface is one that results in a droplet of light mineral oil forming a surface contact angle exceeding 150° but less than the theoretical maximum contact angle of 180° at room temperature. For the purpose of this disclosure the term oleophobic (OP) shall include superoleophobic (SOP) behavior unless stated otherwise, and any and all embodiments, claims, and aspects of this disclosure reciting oleophobic behavior may be limited to either oleophobic behavior that is not superoleophobic (contact angles from) 90°-150° or superoleophobic behavior (contact angles of 150° or greater).
Anti-icing (AI) surfaces are surfaces that are resistant to ice formation and/or accretion in dynamic testing, or that prevent ice that forms from adhering to the surface (i.e., ice that forms can be removed with less force than from untreated metal surfaces).
For the purpose of this disclosure, HP/OP denotes hydrophobic behavior (including superhydrophobic behavior) or properties and/or oleophobic (including superoleophobic behavior) behavior or properties. HP/OP behavior may be understood to include anti-icing properties and any embodiment recited as having HP/OP behavior may be recited as having anti-icing properties, unless stated otherwise in this disclosure.
Durability, unless stated otherwise, refers to the resistance to loss of superhydrophobic or superoleophobic properties due to mechanical abrasion.
Alkyl as used herein denotes a linear or branched alkyl radical or group. Alkyl groups may be independently selected from C1 to C20 alkyl, C2 to C20 alkyl, C4 to C20 alkyl, C6 to C18 alkyl, C6 to C16 alkyl, or C6 to C20 alkyl. Unless otherwise indicated, alkyl does not include cycloalkyl.
Cycloalkyl as used herein denotes a cyclic alkyl radical or group. Cycloalkyl groups may be independently selected from: C4 to C20 alkyl comprising one, two, or more C4 to C8 cycloalkyl functionalities; C6 to C20 alkyl comprising one, two, or more C4 to C8 cycloalkyl functionalities; C6 to C20 alkyl comprising one, two, or more C4 to C8 cycloalkyl functionalities; C5 to C18 alkyl comprising one, two, or more C4 to C8 cycloalkyl functionalities; C6 to C18 alkyl comprising one, two, or more C4 to C8 cycloalkyl functionalities; or C6 to C16 alkyl comprising one, two or more C4 to C8 cycloalkyl functionalities. Where two or more cycloalkyl groups are present they may be present as fused rings or in a spiro configuration. One or more hydrogen atoms of the cycloalkyl groups may be replaced by fluorine atoms.
Haloalkyl as used herein denotes an alkyl group in which some or all of the hydrogen atoms present in an alkyl group have been replaced by halogen atoms. Halogen atoms may be limited to chlorine or fluorine atoms in haloalkyl groups.
Fluoroalkyl as used herein denotes an alkyl group in which some or all of the hydrogen atoms present in an alkyl group have been replaced by fluorine atoms.
Perfluoroalkyl as used herein denotes an alkyl group in which fluorine atoms have been substituted for each hydrogen atom present in the alkyl group.
Rubber phase as used herein denotes a portion of styrene block copolymers having synthetic rubber attributes. In SBCs rubber phases are typically flanked or joined by polystyrene units that may function as end blocks. Typical synthetic rubbers include an isoprenoid or a polyolefin such as polybutadiene, polyisoprene, or ethylene/butylene.
For the purpose of this disclosure, unless stated otherwise, when content is indicated as being present on a “weight basis,” the content is measured as the percentage of the weight of the components indicated to the total weight of the composition (including recited/required solvents). Optional solvents are not included in the weight of the composition.
“Colorant” as used herein is a material added to the coating composition to cause a change in color, i.e., become colored. Colorants can be dyes which bind at least a portion of the material to be colored, insoluble pigments that are dispersed in at least a portion of the material to be colored, colored chemicals that are dispersed or dissolved in at least a portion of the material to be colored, or inks, which may be any combination of dyes, pigments and colored chemicals. In some embodiments, first or second particles may comprise colorants or may be prepared from materials that are colored.
Elastomers are polymers that are elastic (i.e., have viscoelasticity), and which generally have a low Young's modulus and high yield strain compared with other materials. Elastomers may be thermoset materials, which require vulcanization (e.g., covalent crosslinking) during curing, or thermoplastic materials (thermoplastic elastomers), in which the crosslinks are weaker dipole or hydrogen bonds.
Elastomeric binder systems employed to make elastomeric coatings (elastomer based coatings) having HP/OP properties are typically comprised of copolymers of polystyrene and a rubber (a rubber phase) known as Styrenic Block Copolymers (SBCs). SBCs are a class of thermoplastic elastomers consisting of a two-phase structure of hard polystyrene end blocks and soft rubber midblocks. The polystyrene end blocks associate to form domains that lock the molecules into place without vulcanization. Since this is a reversible process, the material can be processed on conventional thermoplastic equipment or dissolved in a suitable solvent for application as a coating. Polystyrene end blocks impart strength and the rubber phase midblocks impart elasticity.
SBC compositions, when used as a base coating, produce highly durable HP/OP coatings as measured by a variety of different methods, including those described herein. Moreover, the coatings are compatible with and adhere tightly to a broad range of materials, permitting a large number and type of objects and substrates to be coated.
SBC elastomers offer a variety of advantages and properties for the preparation of base coats used to prepare HP/OP coatings. As they can be dissolved/suspended in a number of solvents, they may be formulated into compositions that are amenable to application using standard equipment including conventional spray guns and aerosol canisters (e.g., an aerosol spray container comprises a valve assembly, a dip tube, and an actuator). As a base coating composition for use in a multi-step (e.g., two-step, three-step, four-step . . . ) HP/OP coating process, SBC elastomer formulations offer flexibility during application and in the application of the second component of the HP/OP coating process. The elastomeric first component can be applied to form a base coating and the second component, which comprises second particles whose application renders the coating HP/OP, can be applied to the base coating when it is wet, tacky, dry to touch, or even completely dried and cured.
A variety of SBCs may be employed to prepare the HP/OP coatings described herein. In an embodiment the SBC-containing binder compositions comprise a rubber phase comprising ethylene/butylene (EB e.g., —[CH2CH2CH2CH2CH(CH2CH3)CH2]n—). In another embodiment, the SBC-containing binder compositions comprise a rubber phase comprising (poly)butadiene (e.g., styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) elastomeric polymers. In other embodiments, the rubber phases of suitable SBC polymer compositions comprise ethylene/propylene (EP e.g., —[CH2CH2CH(CH3)CH2]n—), polybutadiene, polyisoprene or polyolefin. In another embodiment, binder compositions used for the preparation of durable HP/OP coatings comprise a mixture of any two, three, or four SBC elastomers having rubber phases comprising: ethylene/butylene butadiene, ethylene/propylene polybutadiene, polyisoprene or polyolefin.
Elastomeric coatings with an elongation at break that is greater than about 500%, 600%, 700%, 750%, or about 800% are generally desirable as binders for preparing the durable HP/OP coatings (e.g., coatings prepared with “Kraton G” elastomers), although elastomeric coating compositions with lower elongation at break values can be employed. The rubber component in the SBC copolymers of such elastomer compositions typically varies from about 69% to about 87%, but the rubber component may be about 65% to about 90%, about 67% to about 75%, about 75% to about 87%, or about 70% to about 80% (based on the weight of the SBC copolymer(s)). Among the commercially available SBC elastomer compositions that can be employed as binders for the HP/OP coating compositions described herein are those developed by KRATON® Polymers U.S. LLC. (Houston, Tex.). Various elastomeric polymers, compositions, and their properties are described, for example, in the KRATON® Polymers' Fact Sheet K0151 Americas available on the world wide web at: docs.kraton.com/kraton/attachments/downloads/82021AM.pdf.
In one embodiment the elastomers employed as binders may be ethylene butylene (EB) elastomeric polymers which have styrene domains (endblocks) and ethylene/butylene rubber phase midblocks. Such EB elastomers may comprise about 65% to 75% rubber phase midblocks, (e.g., about 65%, about 70% or about 75% rubber phase midblocks) and have an elongation at break of 500 to 800% using ASTM D412 on films cast from toluene solution with the grip separation speed set at 10 inches per minute. Some properties of KRATON® EB elastomers are detailed in Table 1.
In one embodiment the elastomers employed as binders may be styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) elastomeric polymers. Such SBS elastomers comprise about 60% to 74% butadiene by weight, and have an elongation at break of from 800 to 900% using ASTM D412 on films cast from toluene solution with the grip separation speed set at 10 inches per minute. Some properties of KRATON® styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS) elastomeric polymers (KRATON® D SBS) are detailed in Table 2.
1ASTM method D412 tensile tester grip separation speed 10 in./min.
2Typical properties determined on film cast from toluene solution.
1ASTM method D412 grip separation speed 10 in./min.
2Typical properties determined on film cast from toluene solution
3Typical values on polymer compression molded at 177° C.
4Neat polymer concentration in toluene
5TBD—To Be Determined
In another embodiment the elastomers employed as binders may be maleated styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene (SEBS) elastomeric polymers. Such maleated SEBS elastomers comprise about 65% to about 90% (e.g., about 70% or about 87%) rubber midblocks by weight, and have an elongation at break of 500 to 750% using ASTM D412 on films cast from toluene solution with the grip separation speed set at 10 inches per minute. Maleated SEBS polymers typically have from about 0.8% to about 2.2% (e.g., 0.9% to 2.1% or 1% to 1.7%) of substitution. Some properties of KRATON® styrene-ethylene/butylene-styrene (SEBS) elastomeric polymers (KRATON® FG Polymers) are detailed in Table 3.
1ASTM method D412-tensile tester grip separation speed 10 in./min.
2Typical values on polymer compression molded at 177° C.
In one embodiment the elastomeric binder comprises triblock copolymers of styrene and ethylene/butylene with a polystyrene content of: about 8% to about 14%, about 12% to about 20%, about 18% to about 28%, about 22% to about 32%, about 26% to about 36%, about 8%, about 9%, about 10%, about 11%, about 12%, about 13%, about 14%, about 16%, about 18%, about 19%, about 20%, about 22%, about 24%, about 26%, about 28%, about 30%, about 32%, about 34%, about 36% or mixtures of any two or more, three or more, or four or more of such triblock copolymers. Any one or more of such triblock copolymers may optionally comprise 1% to 3%, 1.4% to 2.0%, 1% to 1.4%, 1.6% to 3%, or 2% to 3% of bound maleic anhydride (maleated copolymers) and may be linear triblock copolymers. In one such embodiment the binder comprises two different maleated triblock copolymers of styrene and ethylene/butylene with a polystyrene: a first triblock copolymer of styrene and ethylene/butylene with a polystyrene having 0.4% to 1.6% (e.g., 0.5% to 1.5%, 0.6% to 1.4,% or 0.7% to 1.3%) substitution by maleic anhydride by weight of the first triblock copolymer (and optionally less than 0.3% maleic anhydride free); and a second triblock copolymer of styrene and ethylene/butylene with a polystyrene having 1.1% to 2.5% (e.g., 1.3 to 2.3 or 1.4 to 2.4%) substitution by maleic anhydride by weight of the second triblock copolymer. In such an embodiment the first and/or second triblock copolymers may be linear or branched copolymers (e.g., arborols or dendrimers), and the second triblock copolymers may be present in a weight ratio from about 4:1 to about 6.5:1 (e.g., the first copolymer to second copolymer ratio is about 4:1 to about 5.5:1, about 5:1 to about 6:1, or about 5.5:1 to about 6.5:1).
Persons skilled in the art will also recognize other elastomeric binders that may be used in place of or in addition to the elastomeric binders described in this disclosure.
In addition to comprising elastomeric polymers (e.g., SBCs), first particles and solvents, elastomeric binder systems that serve as first components optionally comprise a tackifier. Tackifiers may be present in any suitable amount, including in a range selected from about or from about 0.5% to about 30%; 1% to about 5%, from about 2% to about 8%, from about 3% to about 7%, from about 5% to about 10%, from about 10% to about 15%, from about 15% to about 20%, from about 20% to about 25%, or from about 25% to about 30%. Some suitable tackifiers, including totally synthetic (e.g., members of the Regalrez® family from Eastman Chemical) or modified resins or rosins are set forth in the section describing primers that follows.
First components, and primers discussed below, may further comprise light stabilizers and UV absorbers (UV stabilizers), fire retardants, and/or antioxidants. For example, Tinuvin® light stabilizing products (e.g., Tinuvin 328 and/or Tinuvin 770DF) produced by BASF®, and/or IRGANOX® antioxidant products (e.g., phenolic or hindered phenolic antioxidants such as IRGANOX® 1520 or IRGANOX® 150L) produced by BASF® may be included in the first component binder composition used to set down the base coat or in a primer. Where light/UV stabilizers, UV absorbers, fire retardants, and/or antioxidants are added to either or both of the first component or the primer, they are generally added in an amount less than 2% by weight (e.g., about 1%, 0.75%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2% 0.1%, 0.075%, 0.06%, or 0.05%, or in a range selected from about 0.01% to about 2%, from about 0.05% to about 1.0%, or from about 0.75% to about 0.5% by weight), and take the place of a corresponding weight of any solvents that may be present.
In addition to the ease of application, elastomer based coatings that do not contain a colorant or significant amounts of opaque particles are nearly transparent to visible light. Typical light transmission (Total Luminous Transmittance or “TLT”) of an elastomeric binder coating prepared using SBCs having 15 micron thickness is approximately 90% (about 85% to about 92%) with a haze of about 61% (about 55% to about 65%). HP/OP coatings without added colorants that are about 25 microns thick prepared with clear first particles (e.g., EXPANCEL particles or other plastic or glass particles or hollow spheres) and fumed silica second particles treated with a silane (silanizing agent) can be nearly transparent. Such HP/OP coatings typically have a TLT of about 80% (about 75% to about 85%) with a haze of about 90% (about 85% to about 90%) as measure by ASTM D1003-11. For the measurements the instrument was calibrated against air and glass sample blanks and given a TLT of about 90% to about 91% and a haze of about 0.2%. Excluding or removing fine particulate materials such as talc used to increase the properties of commercially available elastomer compositions (e.g., flowability of bulk particulates) may increase TLT and haze values. Such fine particulates used in bulk elastomers may be removed by washing with a suitable solvent or by omitting the material from the elastomer compositions when they are prepared.
A variety of solvents may be employed to dissolve elastomeric binders for the preparation of coating compositions used to prepare the base coat of HP/OP coatings described herein. In some embodiments, the copolymers are dissolved in solvents selected from: methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), ethyl acetate, toluene, 1-chloro-4-(trifluoromethyl)-benzene, xylene or mixed xylenes (including technical grade xylenes), isopropyl acetate, 1,1,1,-trichloroethane, methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK), tertbutyl acetate (t-butyl acetate), cyclohexane, methyl-cyclohexane, or mixtures comprising any two, three, four or more thereof. In one embodiment the solvent(s) are selected from those found in the solubility chart shown in
In any of the foregoing embodiments, particularly where coatings are to be nearly transparent, the elastomeric binder components comprise at most insubstantial amounts (e.g., less than about 0.5% by weight of the polymers present in the binder) of colorants or particulates that are insoluble in solvents that dissolve the elastomeric polymers and/or that would block the transmission of visible light. One source of such particulates is materials added for the flowability of bulk polymers in the form of powders, pellets, or flakes (e.g., talc added to bulk SBCs).
3.1 First Particles
Embodiments of the coatings disclosed herein may comprise particles that are added to the binder compositions to improve the mechanical properties of the coating, e.g., the durability of the HP/OP coatings. A wide variety of such particles, which are also known as extenders or fillers, may be added to the binders. Those particles are denoted herein as “first particles” because the coatings described herein may have one or more additional types of particles. Such first particles that can be employed in the HP/OP coatings described herein include, but are not limited to, particles comprising: wood (e.g., wood dust), glass, metals (e.g., iron, titanium, nickel, zinc, tin), alloys of metals, metal oxides, metalloid oxides (e.g., silica), plastics (e.g., thermoplastics), carbides, nitrides, borides, spinels, diamonds, and fibers (e.g., glass fibers).
Numerous variables may be considered in the selection of first particles. These variables include, but are not limited to, the effect the first particles have on the resulting coatings, their size, their hardness, their compatibility with the binder, the resistance of the first particles to the environment in which the coatings will be employed, and the environment the first particles must endure in the coating and/or curing process, including resistance to temperature and solvent conditions. In addition, if light is used for curing the coatings or they are intended for extended exposure to sunlight, the particles must be resistant to the required light exposure conditions (e.g., resistant to UV light employed in curing or sunlight).
In embodiments described herein, first particles have an average size in a range selected from about 1 micron (μm) to about 300 μm or from about 30 μm to about 225 μm. Within the broader ranges, embodiments include ranges of first particles having an average size of from about 1 μm to about 5 μm, from about 5 μm to about 10 μm, from about 10 μm to about 15 μm, from about 15 μm to about 20 μm, from about 20 μm to about 25 μm, from about 1 μm to about 25 μm, from about 5 μm to about 25 μm, from about 25 μm to about 50 μm, from about 50 μm to about 75 μm, from about 75 μm to about 100 μm, from about 100 μm to about 125 μm, from about 125 μm to about 150 μm, from about 150 μm to about 175 μm, from about 175 μm to about 200 μm, from about 200 μm to about 225 μm, and from about 225 μm to about 250 μm. Also included within this broad range are embodiments employing particles in ranges from about 10 μm to about 100 μm, from about 10 μm to about 200 μm, from about 20 μm to about 200 μm, from about 30 μm to about 50 μm, from about 30 μm to about 100 μm, from about 30 μm to about 200 μm, from about 30 μm to about 225 μm, from about 50 μm to about 100 μm, from about 50 μm to about 200 μm, from about 75 μm to about 150 μm, from about 75 μm to about 200 μm, from about 100 μm to about 225 μm, from about 100 μm to about 250 μm, from about 125 μm to about 225 μm, from about 125 μm to about 250 μm, from about 150 μm to about 200 μm, from about 150 μm to about 250 μm, from about 175 μm to about 250 μm, from about 200 μm to about 250 μm, from about 225 μm to about 275 μm, or from about 250 μm to about 300 μm.
First particles may be incorporated into the elastomer binders at various ratios depending on the binder composition and the first particle's properties. In some embodiments, the first particles may have a content range selected from about 0.01% to about 60% or more by weight. Included within this broad range are embodiments in which the first particles are present, by weight, in ranges from about 0.02% to about 0.2%, from about 0.05% to about 0.5%, from about 0.075% to about 0.75%, from about 0.1% to about 1%, from about 0.5% to about 2.5%, from about 2% to about 5%, from about 5% to about 10%, from about 10% to about 15%, from about 15% to about 20%, from about 20% to about 25%, from about 25% to about 30%, from about 30% to about 35%, from about 35% to about 40%, from about 40% to about 45%, from about 45% to about 50%, from about 50% to about 55%, from about 55% to about 60%, and greater than 60%. Also included within this broad range are embodiments in which the first particles are present, by weight, in ranges from about 4% to about 30%, from about 5% to about 25%, from about 5% to about 35%, from about 10% to about 25%, from about 10% to about 30%, from about 10% to about 40%, from about 10% to about 45%, from about 15% to about 25%, from about 15% to about 35%, from about 15% to about 45%, from about 20% to about 30%, from about 20% to about 35%, from about 20% to about 40%, from about 20% to about 45%, from about 20% to about 55%, from about 25% to about 40%, from about 25% to about 45%, from about 25% to about 55%, from about 30% to about 40%, from about 30% to about 45%, from about 30% to about 55%, from about 30% to about 60%, from about 35% to about 45%, from about 35% to about 50%, from about 35% to about 60%, from about 40% to about 60%, from about 0.01% to about 5%, from about 0.03% to about 1%, from about 0.05% to about 0.15%, from about 0.1% to about 2.5%, from about 0.2% to about 5%, from about 0.05% to about 10%, from about 0.1% to about 10%, from about 0.05% to about 15%, or from about 0.05% to about 20%, on a weight basis.
In those embodiments where it is desirable to have coatings that are transparent, substantially transparent, or colored but transparent, it is generally desirable to employ particles that are transparent. In one set of embodiments, plastic (e.g., thermoplastic) microspheres are employed in the binder systems to develop surface texture. In another set of embodiments, glass microspheres are employed in the binder systems to develop surface texture.
In one embodiment, substantially spherical thermoplastic particles are added to the elastomeric binder composition to develop surface texture (e.g., EXPANCEL microspheres or EXPANCEL particles). Such microspheres consist of a polymer shell encapsulating a gas. The average diameter of these hollow spheres typically ranges from 6 to 45 μm and have a density of 1000 to 1300 kg/m3 (8.3-10.8 lbs/US Gallon). Upon heating, the microspheres expand and the volume of the microspheres can increase more than 40 times (with the diameter changing, for example, from 10 to 40 μm), resulting in a density below 30 kg/m3 (0.25 lbs/US Gallon). Typical expansion temperatures range from 80 to 190° C. (176-374° F.). When heating the microspheres the pressure of the gas inside the shell increases and the thermoplastic shell softens, resulting in a dramatic increase of the volume of the microspheres. Cooling the microspheres results in the shell stiffening again and produces lighter (lower density) expanded microspheres. Some thermoplastic microspheres produced under the EXPANCEL brand (AkzoNobel, distributed by Eka Chemicals, Inc., 2240 Northmont Parkway, Duluth, Ga. 30096, USA) are suitable for use in preparing HP/OP, particularly those that are substantially transparent. See Table 4.
Where HP/OP coatings capable of withstanding higher temperatures are desired, and particularly coatings that are substantially transparent, glass microspheres may be employed in place of thermoplastic microspheres. Such glass microspheres include those produced by 3M™ (St. Paul, Minn.) or Sphere One, Inc. (Chattanooga, Tenn.).
3.1.1 Exemplary Sources of First Particles
First particles may be prepared from the diverse materials described above. Alternatively, first particles may be purchased from a variety of suppliers. Some commercially available first particles that may be employed in the formation of the HP/OP coatings described herein include those in Table 5.
aGPS—general purpose series
bceramic microspheres
chollow spheres
dmodified polyethylene resins
emicroglass milled E-glass filaments
fChattanooga, TN
gPhiladelphia, PA
hBridgewater, MA
iDistributed by Eka Chem., Inc., Duluth, GA
jSt. Paul, MN
kWest Babylon, NY
lSt. Charles, IL
3.2 Second Particles
The coatings disclosed herein employ second particles (e.g., nanoparticles), which are particles that bear, or are associated with, hydrophobic and/or oleophobic compounds or moieties (i.e., moieties that are covalently or non-covalently bound). The hydrophobic moieties can be introduced by treating the particles to include moieties such as siloxanes, fluorinated hydrocarbons (e.g., partly or fully fluorinated hydrocarbons) or nonfluorinated hydrocarbons. In an embodiment, second particles suitable for the preparation of elastomer-based HP/OP coatings have a size from about 1 nanometer (nm) to about 25 μm and are capable of binding covalently to one or more chemical moieties (groups or components) that provide the second particles, and the coatings into which they are incorporated, hydrophobicity, and when selected to include fluoroalkyl groups, hydrophobicity and oleophobicity.
In one embodiment the second particles have a surface area over 100, 150, 200, 250, or 300 square meters per gram (m2/g) of particulate. In another embodiment, where the particles are fumed silica, the surface area can be about or greater than 150, 175, 200, 225 or 250 m2/g.
Second particles having a wide variety of compositions may be employed in the durable HP/OP coatings described and employed herein. In some embodiments the second particles will be particles comprising metal oxides (e.g., aluminum oxides such as alumina, zinc oxides, nickel oxides, zirconium oxides, iron oxides, or titanium dioxides), or oxides of metalloids (e.g., metalloid oxides such as oxides of B, Si, Sb, Te and Ge) such as glass, silica (e.g., fumed silica), silicates, aluminosilicates, or particles comprising combinations thereof.
In some embodiments, the second particles may have an average size in a range selected from about 1 nm up to about 25 μm or more. Included within this broad range are embodiments in which the second particles have an average size in a range selected from: about 1 nm to about 10 nm, from about 10 nm to about 25 nm, from about 25 nm to about 50 nm, from about 50 nm to about 100 nm, from about 100 nm to about 250 nm, from about 250 nm to about 500 nm, from about 500 nm to about 750 nm, from about 750 nm to about 1 μm, from about 1 μm to about 5 μm, from about 5 μm to about 10 μm, from about 10 μm to about 15 μm, from about 15 μm to about 20 μm, from about 20 μm to about 25 μm, from about 1 nm to about 100 nm, from about 2 nm to about 200 nm, from about 10 nm to about 200 nm, from about 20 nm to about 400 nm, from about 10 nm to about 500 nm; from about 40 nm to about 800 nm, from about 100 nm to about 1 μm, from about 200 nm to about 1.5 μm, from about 500 nm to about 2 μm, from about 500 nm to about 2.5 μm, from about 1 μm to about 10 μm, from about 2 μm to about 20 μm, from about 2.5 μm to about 25 μm, from about 500 nm to about 25 μm, from about 400 nm to about 20 μm, from about 100 nm to about 15 μm, from about 1 nm to about 50 nm, from about 1 nm to about 400 nm, from about 1 nm to about 500 nm, from about 2 nm to about 120 nm, from about 5 nm to about 100 nm, from about 5 nm to about 200 nm; from about 5 nm to about 400 nm; from about 10 nm to about 300 nm; or from about 20 nm to about 400 nm.
In the above-mentioned embodiments, the lower size of second particles may be limited to particles greater than about 20 nm, about 25 nm, about 30 nm, about 35 nm, about 40 nm, about 45 nm, about 50 nm, or about 60 nm; and the upper size of second particles may be limited to particles less than about 20 μm, about 10 μm, about 5 μm, about 1 μm, about 0.8 μm, about 0.6 μm, about 0.5 μm, about 0.4 μm, about 0.3 μm, about 0.2 μm, or about 100 nm.
Any combination of particle size, particle composition, surface area, and/or percent composition in the coatings recited herein may be employed in preparing elastomer-based HP/OP coatings. Limitations on the upper and lower size of second particles may be used alone or in combination with any of the above-recited size limits on particle composition, surface area, percent composition in the coatings, and the like.
In some embodiments, the coatings may contain first particles in any of the above-mentioned ranges subject to either the proviso that the coatings do not contain only particles (e.g., first or second particles) with a size of 25 μm or less, or the proviso that the coatings do not contain more than an insubstantial amount of second particles with a size of 25 μm or less (recognizing that separation processes for particles greater than 25 μm may ultimately provide an unintended, insubstantial amount of particles that are 25 μm or less). An insubstantial amount of particles is less than 3% by weight or number of those particles, but it can also be less than 0.5%, 1%, or 2% wherever recited.
In other embodiments, second particles have an average size greater than 30 μm and less than 250 μm, and coatings comprising those particles do not contain more than insubstantial amounts of particles (e.g., first and second particles) with a size of 30 μm or less. In yet other embodiments, the coatings do not contain only particles (e.g., first and second particles) with a size of 40 μm or less, or particles with a size of 40 μm or less in substantial amounts. In addition, in still other embodiments, the coatings do not contain only particles (e.g., first and second particles) with a size of 50 μm or less, or particles with a size of 50 μm or less in substantial amounts.
In other embodiments, such as where the second particles are prepared by fuming (e.g., fumed silica or fumed zinc oxide), the second particles may have an average size in a range selected from about 1 nm to about 50 nm, from about 1 nm to about 100 nm, from about 1 nm to about 400 nm, from about 1 nm to about 500 nm, from about 2 nm to about 120 nm, from about 5 nm to about 100 nm, from about 5 nm to about 200 nm, from about 25 nm to about 100 nm, from about 30 nm to about 200 nm, from about 5 nm to about 400 nm, from about 10 nm to about 300 nm, from about 20 nm to about 400 nm, or from about 50 nm to about 400 nm.
As indicated above, second particles are treated to introduce one or more moieties (e.g., groups or components) that impart HP/OP properties to the particles, either prior to incorporation into the compositions that will be used to apply coatings or after incorporation into the coatings. In some embodiments, the second particles are treated with a silanizing agent, a silane, a siloxane or a silazane, to introduce hydrophobic/superhydrophobic and/or oleophobic/superoleophobic properties to the particles (in addition to any such properties already possessed by the particles).
In one embodiment, second particles are silica, silicates, alumina (e.g., Al2O3), titanium oxide, or zinc oxide that are treated with one or more silanizing agents, e.g., compounds of formula (I) (below). In other embodiments, second particles are comprised of silica, silicates, alumina (e.g., Al2O3), titanium oxide, or zinc oxide that are treated with a siloxane. In another embodiment, the second particles are silica, silicates, glass, alumina (e.g., Al2O3), titanium oxide, or zinc oxide, treated with a silanizing agent, a siloxane or a silazane. In another embodiment, the second particles may be a fumed metal or metalloid (e.g., particles of fumed silica or fumed zinc oxide).
In embodiments where a silanizing agent is employed, the silanizing agent may be a compound of the formula (I):
R4-nSi—Xn (I)
where n is an integer from 1 to 3;
In some embodiments, R is an alkyl or fluoroalkyl group having from 6 to 20 carbon atoms.
In other embodiments, R is an alkyl or fluoroalkyl group having from 8 to 20 carbon atoms.
In other embodiments, R is an alkyl or fluoroalkyl group having from 10 to 20 carbon atoms.
In other embodiments, R is an alkyl or fluoroalkyl group having from 6 to 20 carbon atoms and n is 3.
In other embodiments, R is an alkyl or fluoroalkyl group having from 8 to 20 carbon atoms and n is 3.
In other embodiments, R is an alkyl or fluoroalkyl group having from 10 to 20 carbon atoms and n is 3.
In other embodiments, R has the form —Z—((CF2)q(CF3))r, wherein Z is a C1 to 12 divalent alkane radical or a C2 to 12 divalent alkene or alkyne radical, q is an integer from 1 to 12, and r is an integer from 1 to 4.
In any of the previously mentioned embodiments of compounds of formula (I), the value of n may be varied such that 1, 2 or 3 independently selected terminal functionalities are present. Thus, in some embodiments, n is 3. In other embodiments, n is 2. In still other embodiments, n is 1.
In any of the previously mentioned embodiments of compounds of formula (I), all halogen atoms present in any one or more R groups may be fluorine.
In any of the previously mentioned embodiments of compounds of formula (I), X may be independently selected from H, Cl, —OR2, —NHR3, —N(R3)2, or combinations thereof. In other embodiments, X may be selected from Cl, —OR2, —NHR3, —N(R3)2, or combinations thereof. In still other embodiments, X may be selected from —Cl, —NHR3, —N(R3)2 or combinations thereof.
Any coating described herein may be prepared with one, two, three, four or more compounds of formula (I) employed alone or in combination to modify the nano-particles, and/or other components of the coating including filler-particles. The use of silanizing agents of formula (I) to modify nano-particles, or any of the other components of the coatings, will introduce one or more R3-nXnSi—groups (e.g., R3Si—, R2X1Si-, or RX2Si—groups) where R and X are as defined for a compound of formula (I). The value of n is 0, 1, or 2, due to the displacement of at least one “X” substituent and formation of at least one bond between a nano-particle and the Si atom (the bond between the nano-particle and the silicon atom is indicated by a dash “-” (e.g., R3Si—, R2X1Si—, or RX2Si—groups).
In other embodiments, suitable silanizing agents for modifying the nano-particles used in the coating compositions generally comprise those with fluorinated or polyfluorinated alkyl groups (e.g., fluoroalkyl groups) or alkyl groups (hydrocarbon containing groups) including, but not limited to:
(tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl)silane (SIT8173.0);
(tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl)trichlorosilane (SIT8174.0);
(tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl)triethoxysilane (SIT8175.0);
(tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl)trimethoxysilane (SIT8176.0);
(heptadecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrodecyl)dimethyl(dimethylamino)silane (SIH5840.5);
(heptadecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrodecyl)tris(dimethylamino)silane (SIH5841.7);
n-octadecyltrimethoxysilane (SIO6645.0); n-octyltriethoxysilane (SIO6715.0); and
3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-nonafluorohexyldimethyl(dimethylamino)silane (SIN6597.4) where the designations given in parentheses are the product numbers from Gelest, Inc., Morrisville, Pa.
Another group of reagents that can be employed to prepare first or second particles with hydrophobic and/or oleophobic properties include
(tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl)trichlorosilane:
(tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl)triethoxysilane;
nonafluorohexyldimethylchlorosilane
(tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl)trimethoxysilane;
3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-nonafluorohexyldimethyl(dimethylamino)-silane:
nonafluorohexylmethyldichlorosilane;
nonafluorohexyltrichlorosilane;
nonafluorohexyltriethoxysilane; and
nonafluorohexyltrimethoxysilane.
In one embodiment, the coating compositions set forth herein comprise silica second particles treated with nonafluorohexyltrichlorosilane.
In addition to the silanizing agents recited above, a variety of other silanizing agents can be used to alter the properties of second particles and to provide hydrophobic and/or oleophobic properties. In some embodiments, second particles may be treated with an agent selected from dimethyldichlorosilane, hexamethyldisilazane, octyltrimethoxysilane, or tridecafluoro-1,1,2,2-tetrahydrooctyl trichlorosilane. In such embodiments, the second particles may be silica. Silica second particles treated with such agents may have an average size in a range selected from about 1 nm to about 50 nm, from about 1 nm to about 100 nm, from about 1 nm to about 400 nm, from about 1 nm to about 500 nm, from about 2 nm to about 120 nm, from about 5 nm to about 150 nm, from about 5 nm to about 400 nm, from about 10 nm to about 300 nm, from about 20 nm to about 400 nm, or from about 50 nm to about 250 nm.
Other agents can be used to modify second particles, including, but not limited to, one or more of: polydimethylsiloxane, gamma-aminopropyltriethoxysilane, Dynasylan® A (tetraethylorthosilicate), hexamethyldisilazane, and Dynasylan® F 8263 (fluoroalkylsilane), any one or more of which may be used alone or in combination with the silanizing agents recited herein.
Two attributes of silanizing agents that may be considered for the purposes of their reaction with second particles and the introduction of hydrophobic or oleophobic moieties are the leaving group (e.g., X groups of compounds of the formula (I)) and the terminal functionality (e.g., R groups of compounds of the formula (I)). A silanizing agent's leaving group(s) can determine the reactivity of the agent with the first or second particle(s), or other components of the coating, if applied after a coating has been applied. Where the first or second particles are a silicate or silica (e.g., fumed silica) the leaving group can be displaced to form Si—O—Si bonds. Leaving group effectiveness is ranked in the decreasing order as chloro>methoxy>hydro (H)>ethoxy (measured as trichloro>trimethoxy>trihydro>triethoxy). This ranking of the leaving groups is consistent with their bond dissociation energy. The terminal functionality determines the level of hydrophobicity that results from application of the silane to the surface.
3.2.1 Some Sources of Second Particles
Second particles such as those comprising fumed silica may be purchased from a variety of suppliers including, but not limited to, Cabot Corp., Billerica, Mass. (e.g., Nanogel TLD201, CAB-O-SIL® TS-720 (silica, pretreated with polydimethylsiloxane), and M5 (untreated silica)) and Evonik Industries, Essen, Germany (e.g., ACEMATT® silica such as untreated HK400, AEROXIDE® silica, AEROXIDE® TiO2 titanium dioxide, and AEROXIDE® Alu alumina).
Some commercially available second particles are set forth in Table 6 along with their surface treatment by a silanizing agent or polydimethyl siloxane.
As purchased, the particles may be untreated (e.g., M5 silica) and may not possess any HP/OP properties. Such untreated particles can be treated to covalently attach one or more groups or moieties to the particles that give them HP/OP properties, for example, by treatment with the silanizing agents discussed above.
3.2.2 Dispersants for Second Particles
Second particles can be applied to a base coating of elastomeric binder after it has been applied to the surface of an object (or a part thereof) in the form of a second component having a composition comprising one or more independently selected second particles as described above (e.g., second particles having a size of about 1 nanometer (nm) to about 25 microns (μm) wherein said particles comprise one or more independently selected alkyl, haloalkyl, or perfluoroalkyl moieties bound, either directly or indirectly, to said second particles; wherein said second component optionally comprises one or more solvents (liquid dispersants).
If the elastomeric coating has not dried, or has been subjected to a solvent that dissolves at least the outermost portion of the binder (e.g., renders it sufficiently tacky), second particles may be applied directly to the elastomeric binder by contacting the second particles with the binder. Second particles may be contacted with the surface by any suitable means, including spraying them on the surface using a stream of gas (e.g., air, nitrogen, or an inert gas), exposing the binder coating to particles suspended in a gas, or contacting the base coat of elastomeric binder with a fluidized bed of second particles.
Second particles can also be applied to a base coating of elastomeric binder in a second coating component that, in addition to the second particles, contains a solvent (dispersant) that dissolves, expands or swells the outermost portion of the binder sufficiently (e.g., renders it tacky) to permit the second particles to become bound in at least the outermost portion of the binder base coat. Where second components of the coating composition comprise a solvent, the second particles are dispersed in the solvent for application. Second particles, and particularly smaller second particles (e.g., 1-50 nm or 1-100 nm), may form aggregates in solvents used as dispersants.
Suitable solvents include those with a surface energy lower than water including, but not limited to: alcohols, ketones, acetone, methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), ethyl acetate, toluene, xylene, isopropyl acetate, 1,1,1,-trichloroethane, methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK), tertbutyl acetate (t-butyl acetate), cyclohexane, methyl-cyclohexane, or mixtures comprising any two, three, four or more thereof. In an embodiment, the solvents are non-aqueous (e.g., they contain less than 10%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, or 0.5% of water by weight or they contain only insubstantial amounts of water). Solvents that are miscible with water are employed in the second coating component in another embodiment. In another embodiment, the solvent comprises a non-aqueous water miscible solvent. In one embodiment, the solvent employed in the second coating component is acetone or is comprised of acetone. In another embodiment the solvent employed in the second coating component is NMP (N-methylpyrrolidone) or is comprised of NMP. In other embodiments, the solvent employed in the second coating composition comprises a mixture of acetone or NMP with water, particularly a minor proportion of water (e.g., less than about 5%, less than about 4%, less than about 2%, less than about 1%, or less than about 0.5% water).
In one embodiment, the second component of the coating composition (i.e., the top coat) comprises:
i) one or more independently selected second particles having a size of about 1 nanometer to about 25 microns, wherein said second particles comprise one or more independently selected alkyl, haloalkyl, or perfluoroalkyl moieties bound, either directly or indirectly, to said second particles; and
ii) optionally, one or more independently selected solvents, wherein when said one or more solvents are present, said second particles may be present in a weight percent range selected from (0.1-1, 1.0-2.0, 0.2-2.0, 0.5-1.5, 0.5-2.0, 0.75-2.5, 1.5-2.0, 1.5-2.5, 2.0-3.0, 2.0-3.5, or 2.5-3.5) based on the weight of the one or more solvents and second particles.
In another embodiment, the second component of the coating composition (i.e., the top coat) comprises:
(i) 0.1 to 3.5 parts by weight (e.g., 0.1-1, 1.0-2.0, 0.2-2.0, 0.5-1.5, 0.5-2.0, 0.75-2.5, 1.5-2.0, 1.5-2.5, 2.0-3.0, 2.0-3.5, or 2.5-3.5) of second particles that comprise one or more independently selected alkyl, haloalkyl, or perfluoroalkyl moieties bound, either directly or indirectly, to said second particles, or one or more siloxanes or silazanes associated with the second particles;
(ii) a fluorinated polyolefin, (e.g., a polymer of tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene and vinylidene fluoride, such as Dyneon™ THV); and/or a Fluoroethylene-Alkyl Vinyl Ether (FEVE) copolymer; and
(iii) a solvent for a the remainder of a total of 100 parts by weight.
In another embodiment, the fluorinated polyolefin (e.g., a polymer of tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene and vinylidene fluoride, such as Dyneon™ THV), if present, comprises from 0.1 to 1.0 parts by weight (e.g., 0.1-0.5, 0.5-1.0, or 0.3-0.7 parts) of the composition.
In another embodiment, the Fluoroethylene-Alkyl Vinyl Ether (e.g., the constituent polymer found in Lumiflon™), if present, comprises 0.06 to 0.6 parts by weight (e.g., 0.06-0.0.1, 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.4, or 0.4-0.6 parts) of the composition. In such an embodiment the FEVE may have an average molecular weight of about 1,000 to 3,000 (e.g., about 1,000-2,000, 2,000-3,000, 1,500-2,500, or about 1,000, about 1,500, about 2,000, about 2,500, or about 3,000 Dalton). Accordingly, one embodiment of the second component comprises per 100 parts by weight:
i) 0.1 to 3.5 parts by weight (e.g., 0.1-1, 1.0-2.0, 0.2-2.0, 0.5-1.5, 0.5-2.0, 0.75-2.5, 1.5-2.0, 1.5-2.5, 2.0-3.0, 2.0-3.5, or 2.5-3.5) of one or more independently selected second particles having a size of about 1 nanometer to about 25 microns, wherein said second particles comprise one or more independently selected alkyl, haloalkyl, or perfluoroalkyl moieties bound, either directly or indirectly, to said second particles, or one or more siloxanes or silazanes associated with said second particles;
ii) 0.1 to 1.0 parts by weight (e.g., 0.1-0.5, 0.5-1.0, or 0.3-0.7 parts) of a fluorinated polyolefin, (e.g., a polymer of tetrafluoroethylene, hexafluoropropylene and vinylidene fluoride, such as Dyneon™ THV); and/or
(iii) one or more solvent for a the remainder of a total of 100 parts by weight.
Where the solvent employed in second coating compositions dissolves or renders at least the outermost layer of the elastomeric binder “tacky,” second particles can be introduced into completely dried and cured base coats of elastomeric binder. That permits the repair of worn or abraded coatings that have lost HP/OP behavior over all or part of their surface.
To improve the adherence and performance of the coatings described herein the surface to be coated, in whole or in part, should be clean, free of contaminants and capable of supporting the coatings (e.g., not friable).
Performance of the coatings in terms of their durability can be significantly improved by the application of a primer. Any primer compatible with both the surface of the object and the elastomeric coating can be employed.
A variety of primer compositions may be employed. In one embodiment the primers comprise one or more polymers that are elastic (i.e., have viscoelasticity), such as those that comprise the binder used in the first component of the coating compositions described herein (e.g., SBCs). In one embodiment, the primer comprises one or more polymers that are elastic (i.e., have viscoelasticity, e.g., SBCs) and a tackifier. In one embodiment, the primer is a PLASTI DIP™ metal primer f938hp.
In one embodiment, when a tackifier is employed, it may be selected from resins (e.g. rosins and their derivates; terpenes and modified terpenes; aliphatic, cycloaliphatic and aromatic resins (C5 aliphatic resins, C9 aromatic resins, and C5/C9 aliphatic/aromatic resins); hydrogenated hydrocarbon resins (e.g., Regalrez™ 1094, Eastman Chemical Co., Kingsport Tenn.), and mixtures thereof and/or terpene-phenol resins). In one embodiment the tackifier is an ester of hydrogenated rosin (e.g., FORAL™ 105-E ester of hydrogenated rosin).
In other embodiments the primer is an elastomeric primer comprising triblock copolymers of styrene and ethylene/butylene and an ester of a hydrogenated thermoplastic rosin (e.g., FORAL™ 105-E, Eastman Chemical). The polystyrene content of the triblock copolymers will typically be from about 8% to about 14%, from about 12% to about 20%, from about 18% to about 28%, from about 22% to about 32%, from about 26% to about 36%, about 8%, about 9%, about 10%, about 11%, about 12%, about 13%, about 14%, about 16%, about 18%, about 19%, about 20%, about 22%, about 24%, about 26%, about 28%, about 30%, about 32%, about 34%, or about 36%. Mixtures of any two or more, three or more, or four or more of such triblock copolymers may also be employed in the primer composition, and any one or more of such triblock copolymers may optionally comprise 1% to 3%, 1.4% to 2.0%, 1% to 1.4%, 1.6% to 3%, or 2% to 3% bound maleic anhydride (maleated copolymers). Any of the foregoing triblock copolymers may be linear or branched (e.g., dendrimers or arborols).
In one embodiment wherein the elastomeric primer comprises triblock copolymers of styrene and ethylene/butylene and an ester of a hydrogenated thermoplastic rosin, the primer comprises two different maleated triblock copolymers of styrene and ethylene/butylene with a polystyrene: a first triblock copolymer of styrene and ethylene/butylene with a polystyrene having 0.4% to 1.6% (e.g., 0.5% to 1.5%, 0.6% to 1.4,% or 0.7% to 1.3%) substitution of maleic anhydride by weight of the first triblock copolymer (and optionally less than 0.3% free maleic anhydride); and a second triblock copolymer of styrene and ethylene/butylene with a polystyrene having 1.1% to 2.5% (e.g., 1.3 to 2.3 or 1.4 to 2.4%) substitution of maleic anhydride by weight of the second triblock copolymer. In such an embodiment the first and/or second triblock copolymers may be linear or branched copolymers (e.g., arborols or dendrimers), and the second triblock copolymers may be present in a weight ratio from about 4:1 to about 6.5:1 (e.g., the first copolymer to second copolymer ratio is about 4:1 to about 5.5:1, about 5:1 to about 6:1, or about 5.5:1 to about 6.5:1). The ratio of the total triblock copolymer (first and second) to the ester of a hydrogenated thermoplastic rosin is typically 1:5 to 2.5:5 (triblock copolymers: ester(s) of hydrogenated thermoplastic rosin). Ratios for all three components include 7:1:25, 7.2:1.3:25, 7.6:1.6:25, and 8:1.8:25 (first triblock copolymer: second triblock copolymer: ester of a hydrogenated thermoplastic rosin).
In any of the foregoing embodiments the primers may also comprise insubstantial amounts (e.g., less than about 2% by weight of the polymers present in the binder, such as less than 1.0%, 0.75%, 0.5%, 0.25%, or 0.1%) of colorants or particulates that are insoluble in the solvents that dissolve the elastomeric polymers and/or that would block the transmission of visible light in the dried cured coating (e.g., talc added for the flowability of particles of the polymers as produced).
In any of the foregoing embodiments the primers may also comprise first particles for texture development in the primer and/or the base coat (i.e., a base coat of elastomeric binder with or without first particles).
In another embodiment, when a tackifier is employed it may be a hydrocarbon resin. In one embodiment where hydrocarbon resins are employed, they may be selected from resins such as those prepared from petroleum based feedstocks (e.g., aliphatic (C5), aromatic (C9), DCPD (dicyclopentadiene) resins, or mixtures of these).
Elastomeric primers not only promote bonding to substrate surfaces such as metals, but also provide for improved adhesion to the base coat. In addition, such primers compensate for differences in the coefficient of thermal expansion between the HP/OP coating and the substrate.
In other embodiments, primers comprise polyurethane polymers. Such polyurethane containing primers (“polyurethane primers”) demonstrate excellent bonding to many substrates including metallic substrates. When employing a polyurethane primer, it is possible to incorporate first particles into the primer and/or the base coat (a base coat of elastomeric binder with or without first particles) for texture development. Thus, in addition to promoting adhesion, the primer can also serve to develop texture with increased surface area for improved adhesion of the base coat comprising an elastomeric binder, develop wear resistance, and develop hydrophobicity/oleophobicity. The HP/OP coatings applied over the elastomeric primers or two part polyurethane primers described herein display essentially equal resistance to the loss of hydrophobicity in Taber Abraser wear/abrasion resistance tests (as measured by Taber Abraser cycles) when abrasive (CS-10) and soft (CS-0) wheels are employed.
The coatings described herein (including any underlying primer) can be applied to surfaces using any means known in the art including, but not limited to, brushing, painting, printing, stamping, rolling, dipping, spin-coating, spraying, or electrostatic spraying. In one embodiment, one or more of a primer, base coat and/or top coat are applied by spraying. In another embodiment, each of a primer (if present), base coat and top coat are applied by spraying.
In one embodiment the first and second coating compositions described herein are separately prepackaged in a delivery system/apparatus for spray applications, such as aerosol canisters (e.g., pre-pressurized aerosol cans). In such an embodiment, the first component and second component can be packaged in separate delivery systems/apparatus. A propellant is added to the system/apparatus that serves to drive the components out of their canisters for delivery. Propellants will typically be a gas at 25° C. and 1 atmosphere, but may be in a different phase (liquid) under pressure, such as in a pressurized aerosol delivery system. The propellant may be a gas (e.g., air or nitrogen) or a liquefiable gas having a vapor pressure sufficient to propel and aerosolize the first and/or second components as they exit their delivery system/apparatus). Some exemplary propellants include: liquefied petroleum gases, ethers (e.g., dimethyl ether (DME) and diethyl ether); C1-C4 saturated hydrocarbons (e.g., methane, ethane, propane, n-butane, and isobutene); hydrofluorocarbons (HFC) (e.g., 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a), 1,1,1,2,3,3,3,-heptafluoropropane (HFC-227HFC), difluoromethane (HFC-32), 1,1,1-trifluoroethane (HFC-143a), 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134), and 1,1-difluoroethane (HFC-152a)), and mixtures comprising any two, three or more of the foregoing. In another embodiment, the propellant is a blend of n-butane and propane.
Generally, the surfaces will be rigid or semi-rigid, but the surfaces can also be flexible, for example in the instance of wires, tapes, rubberized materials, gaskets, and ribbons.
The coatings described herein can be applied to virtually any substrate to provide HP/OP properties. The choice of coatings and coating processes that will be used may be affected by the compatibility of the substrate and its surface to the coating process and the component of the coating compositions. Among the considerations are the compatibility of the substrate and its surface with any solvents that may be employed in the application of the coatings and the ability of a desired coating to adhere to the substrate's surface.
Coatings may take any desired shape or form, limited only by the manner and patterns in which they can be applied. In some embodiments, the coating will completely cover a surface. In other embodiments the coating will cover only a portion of a surface, such as one or more of a top, side or bottom of an object. In one embodiment, a coating is applied as a line or strip on a substantially flat or planar surface. In such an embodiment the line or strip may form a spill-resistant border.
The shape, dimensions and placement of HP/OP coatings on surfaces can be controlled by a variety of means including the use of masks, which can control not only the portions of a surface that will receive a coating, but also the portions of a surface that may receive prior treatments such as the application of a primer layer or cleaning by abrasion or solvents. For example, where sandblasting or a chemical treatment is used to prepare a portion of a surface for coating, a mask resistant to those treatments would be selected (e.g., a mask such as a rigid or flexible plastic, resin, or rubber/rubberized material). Masking may be attached to the surface through the use of adhesives, which may be applied to the mask agent, the surface, or both.
In another embodiment HP/OP coatings are applied to a ribbon, tape or sheet that may then be applied to a substrate by any suitable means including adhesive applied to the substrate, the ribbon or tape, or both. Ribbons, tapes and sheets bearing a superhydrophobic coating may be employed in a variety of applications, including forming spill proof barriers on surfaces. Ribbons, tapes, and sheets are generally formed of a substantially flat (planar) flexible material where one side (the top) is made hydrophobic or superhydrophobic. This includes metal sheets, ribbons, and tapes such as aluminum tape or other tapes (e.g., metal adhesive tape, plastic adhesive tape, paper adhesive tape, fiberglass adhesive tape), wherein one side is coated with an HP/OP coating and adhesive is applied to the other side. Once such HP/OP ribbons, tapes, and sheets are prepared, they can be applied to any type of surface including metal, ceramic, glass, plastic, or wood surfaces, for a variety of purposes.
In one embodiment, HP/OP coatings are applied to the surface of an object by a method comprising:
(a) applying a first component to all or part of the surface of an object; followed by
(b) applying a second component to all or the part of the surface of said object to which said first component was applied.
In another embodiment, HP/OP coatings are applied by a coating method comprising:
(a) applying a first component of a two-component coating composition to all or part of the surface of an object; followed by
(b) applying a second component of the two-component coating composition to all or the part of the surface of said object to which said first component was applied.
In such an embodiment, the first component and second component may be applied using one or more methods selected independently from brushing, painting, printing, stamping, rolling, dipping, spin-coating, or spraying. Such a process is at least a two-step process, but may include additional steps, such as a second application of the second component making it a three or more step process.
In an embodiment, one or both of the first and second components are applied to a surface by spraying in a method comprising:
(a) spraying a first component of a two-component coating composition (e.g., an elastomeric binder and first particles) on all or part of the surface of an object; followed by
(b) spraying a second component of said two-component coating composition (e.g., second particles and optionally a solvent) on all or part of the surface of an object to which said first component was applied. In one embodiment, the spraying may be conducted using first, second, or both components packaged in aerosol spray canisters.
In an embodiment of the above-described coating process, a base coat of elastomeric polymer binder and first particles (e.g., EXPANCEL particles) is applied as the first component. Once the base coat loses sufficient solvent so that it: does not run when a second component is applied; is close to being dry to touch (e.g., is tacky); becomes dry to touch; or is dry, a second coating component (e.g., second particles and an optional dispersant such as acetone) is applied. The solvent in the dispersant helps attach the functional second particles to the binder of the base coat. Other than allowing any solvent used as a dispersant to evaporate no additional curing cycle is needed.
The coating obtained is durable and delivers HP/OP behavior and can be applied to a variety of substrates including metals, ceramics, polymerics and fabrics and in a number of specific applications as set forth below.
The elastomeric coating described herein may be employed in a variety of applications including, but not limited to, coatings for all or part of:
Use of the coating can be facilitated by providing the first and second components for preparing the coatings described herein in a form that permits facile application. In one embodiment the first and/or second components are prepackaged in solvent or propellant delivery systems such as aerosol canisters (e.g., aerosol cans).
Coatings prepared using the elastomeric binder first component and second coating composition described herein can be evaluated using one or more criteria including, but not limited to:
The oleophobicity of first or second particles (e.g., fumed silica treated with a silane, silazane, silanol, siloxane, fluorinated versions thereof, etc.) can be tested in the same manner. In such tests the first and/or second particles are applied to a clean 4×4 inch aluminum plate by spraying a suspension containing 2% particles 98% acetone by weight to form a coating of particles that cover the aluminum plate. After the plate has dried, the above-listed hydrocarbon liquids are tested on the particle coatings in the same manner as they would be on an elastomeric coating, and the particles scored in the same manner.
Embodiment 1, has is divided into two sub-embodiments, that are recited below as embodiments 1.1. and 1.2. In embodiment 1.1 the second component comprises second particles and one or more solvents, but does not require a fluoropolymer. In contrast, the second component of sub-embodiment 1.2 requires not only second particles, but also a fluorinated polyolefin and/or a Fluoroethylene-Alkyl Vinyl Ether (FEVE) copolymer, and one or more solvents. In subsequent embodiments, any reference to embodiment 1 refers to either embodiment 1.1 and/or 1.2.
Embodiment 1.1 A combination of components for forming a coating comprising:
One part by weight of elastomeric coating (24% by weight of solids) supplied as clear liquid from PLASTI DIP™ International, Inc. (Blaine, Minn.) is combined with two parts by weight of xylene and mixed. The mixture of elastomer and xylene is divided into six aliquots and the indicated amounts of EXPANCEL 461 DET d25 (0.01% to 0.5% by weight based on the total weight of the elastomer and xylene mixture) is added to separate aliquots. The aliquots are mixed to form first component compositions. The first component compositions are sprayed onto individual aluminum plates to form a base coat. The base coated aluminum plates are then top coated with a second component consisting of a 2% (w/w) dispersion in acetone of fumed silica particles modified to render them hydrophobic by reacting them with tridecafluoro tetrahydroctyl trichloro silane (fumed silica to silane ration is 2:1 by weight). Test data for plates is summarized in the table below and the data is plotted in
Data on HP/OP Elastomeric Coatings from Example 1
Data in the table above and
Six first component mixtures are prepared as in Example 1 using 0.1% of five different types of EXPANCEL particles (duplicate samples containing EXPANCEL 031 DU 400), and the first components are each applied to a different aluminum plate by spraying to form a base coat. The base coating on each plate is then top coated with a second component comprising a 2% (w/w) dispersion of fumed silica particles treated with tridecafluoro tetrahydroctyl trichlorosilane suspended in acetone. For samples containing EXPANCEL 031 DU 400) the aluminum plates were heated to 80° C. for 2-3 minutes either before or after the application of the second component to expand the EXPANCEL particles. Test data for the plates are summarized in the table of performance data, below, and plotted in
Performance Data by Using 0.1% by Weight of Different EXPANCEL Particles in Elastomeric Coating
Data in the table above and
A series of aluminum plates primed with PLASTI DIP™ primer for metals according to the manufacturer's instructions are base coated as in Example 1, with 0.1% EXPANCEL 461 DET d25 particles added to the first component, which is applied by spraying. After the base coat has dried at room temperature, one set of plates is treated with a second component as in Example 1. The second component comprises 20 g of 20-80 nm fumed silica particles having a surface area of about 200m2/g (Evonik Industries, Horsham PA), treated in an Osterizer kitchen blender for 10minutes at room temperature with 10 g of tridecafluoro tetrahydroctyl trichloro silane. A second set of plates is also treated with a second component as in Example 1, using silica from the same supplier prepared in a larger batch using 5,000 g of the silica reacted with tridecafluoro tetrahydroctyl trichloro silane 2,500 g in a 10 kg reactor system at room temperature for 2-3 hours. In this example, after top coats are applied the plates are dried for 15 minutes at 170° F. (77° C.). Two plates treated with fumed silica prepared in the blender and two plates treated with fumed silica prepared in the reactor are subjected to thickness and surface roughness measurements. The point at which the plates lose superhydrophobic behavior is also determined using Taber Abraser equipped with CS-0 wheels at a 1,000 g load and using glove rub testing. Loss of superhydrophobic behavior is deemed to be the point at which more than half of the water droplets applied to the tested portion of a substantially planar surface inclined at 5 degrees from the horizontal do not roll off the plate.
Data on plates coated with fumed silica particles prepared in the blender is summarized in Table 7, and data on plates treated with fumed silica prepared in the reactor is shown in Table 8.
The data in Tables 7 and 8 indicate that superhydrophobic coatings prepared with fumed silicas produced in reactors on different scales display similar properties.
Glass plates are coated with a near transparent coating based on elastomeric binder systems as in Example 1 with the exception that the plate marked P does not include first particles (EXPANCEL particles) in the base coat (first component). The plate marked SE-1 contains 0.1% of EXPANCEL particles in the first component. Samples are tested for Haze value and Total Luminous Transmittance (TLT) values using the method described in ASTM D1003. The instrument is calibrated without a sample present using air as a standard. Calibration values are TLT=100 and Haze=0. Clear, clean, uncoated glass plates have average readings of TLT=90.6 and a haze reading of 0.18. Plates lacking first particles (P-coat) have about the same transparency as clear clean glass. The presence of EXPANCEL particles in the base coat reduces the transparency by about 10%. The coating haze increases from about 0.18 for glass to about 61% for coatings without first particles and to about 90% for coatings including EXPANCEL particles in the base coating. See Table 9.
Six aluminum plates (10 cm×10 cm) are primed with PLASTI DIP™ primer for metal (product f938 hp). Pairs of the primed plates are spray coated with first component as in Example 1 (0.1% EXPANCELs) to achieve a base coat thicknesses of about 1, 1.5, or 2.6 ml respectively. One plate at each coating thickness is top coated with 2 ml of the second component as described in Example 1, and the second plate at each coating thickness is top coated with 4 ml of second component. Coating thicknesses, which include the primer thickness, and Taber Abraser data are summarized in Table 10A and data is plotted in
Based on the data above, 2 ml of top coat (0.02 ml/cm2) produces no benefits in performance improvement at any thickness. However, when the top coat is increased to 4 ml (0.04 ml/cm2), it provides an adequate performance that increases with coating thickness. While not wishing to be bound by any theory, it appears that at the higher application rate the top coat penetrates to some depth into the base coat. When only 2 ml (0.02 ml/cm2) is applied the coating may be sufficient to just cover the base coat, but not enough to permit the second particles to penetrate at any significant level that will increase the durability of SH performance. In addition, when the base coat is very thin, tearing becomes the failure mode.
Aluminum plates are primed with a two-part polyurethane coating (DESMOPHEN 670BA with DESMODUR N75 BA-XBMS, Bayer Material Science) prepared and applied per manufacturer's instructions. An elastomeric coating as described in Example 1 (0.1% of EXPANCEL 461 DET d25) is employed in the first component. Coated plates are measured for coating thickness (including primer thickness) and their ability to resist the loss of superhydrophobic behavior using a Taber Abraser fitted with CS-10 (abrasive) wheels and CS-0 (soft rubber) wheels at a 1,000 g load is recorded. All end points for loss for superhydrophobic behavior are measured for water droplet roll off with the plates inclined at 5 degrees from the horizontal (5 degree tilt angle). Test data is summarized in Table 10B.
Elastomeric coatings are prepared on aluminum test plates as described in Example 1, with the exception that the first component contains first particles as indicated in Table 11. The test plates are assessed for loss of superhydrophobic behavior using glove rubs as a rapid test for assessment of handleability and abrasion resistance/durability. Test data for all coated plates are summarized in Table 11.
Thermoplastic particles and hollow glass particles yield similar performance in increasing coating durability.
PLASTI DIP™ (24% solids by weight) elastomeric coating (5 parts by weight of the liquid as provided by the supplier) is combined with seven parts by weight of xylene and mixed. To the resulting mixture of elastomer and xylene, micronized rubber particles (Lehigh Technology, Tucker, Ga.) about 4% or about 7.7% by weight are added to separate aliquots (based on the weight of the elastomer and xylene combined). The particles are mixed into each aliquot to form first component compositions. The first component compositions are applied to separate aluminum plates to form base coats, and the base coats are top coated with a second component as described in Example 1.
Test data showing resistance to the loss of superhydrophobicity based on glove rub testing and Taber testing for the coatings incorporating rubber particles is provided in Table 12. That data shows the incorporation of elastomeric binder used in this example with micronized rubber particles produces highly durable surfaces that show increasing resistance to the loss of hydrophobicity with increasing amounts of rubber first particles incorporated into the binder up to at least 7.69%.
Elastomeric coatings are prepared as in Example 8 employing 7.69% of micronized rubber by weight in the first component. The coatings are applied to clean but unprimed aluminum plates or aluminum plates that have been treated with an elastomeric metal primer (PLASTI DIP™ metal primer) per the manufacturer's instructions. All plates are substantially planar. The top coating step is the same as in Example 8 and Example 1. The coated plates are assessed for resistance to the loss of SH behavior using a Taber Abraser fitted with CS-0 wheels or CS-10 wheels (as indicated) using 1,000 g loads at 95 rpm, resistance to the loss of SH behavior using glove rubs, and coating thickness, which is measured including primer where present. The appearance of coating failures is also recorded for each plate and the data set forth in Table 13.
The data indicates that samples with and without primer resist the loss of superhydrophobicity with a very large number of glove rubs. Taber Abraser testing results in a loss of that property due to ripping and/or tearing of the coating in the absence of primer. Loss of superhydrophobic behavior is assessed using the above-described droplet run off test with plates inclined at 5 degrees from the horizontal. Priming of the metal surfaces increases the number of Taber cycles the test samples can withstand without losing superhydrophobic behavior by about 4 to about 8 fold, regardless of whether non-abrasive rubber (CS-0) or abrasive (CS-10) wheels are employed.
Elastomeric coatings incorporating EXPANCELs as in Example 1, or micronized rubber as in Example 8, are scraped from their plates and used for thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). TGA data for the coatings is plotted in
1. The coating containing EXPANCEL is stable up to 241° C. (465° F.)
2. The coating containing micronized rubber is stable up to 261° C. (502° F.)
Based upon the data presented above the coatings may be used up to temperatures of 200° C. or 400° F.
Three styrenic block copolymers (SBCs), FG 1901, FG 1924 and RP 6670, each obtained from KRATON®, are dissolved in xylene at 20% by weight. Regalrez™ 1094 tackifier, obtained from Eastman Chemical Company, is dissolved in xylene at 20% by weight. Varying ratios of SBCs and tackifier solutions are mixed and UV stabilizers and antioxidants, 0.1% Irganox® 1520L, 0.056% Tinuvin® 328, and 0.056% Tinuvin® 770DF (% by weight), are added.
Each of the mixtures of SBCs and tackifier formed is used as a first component and HP/OP coatings are prepared as in Example 1, using 0.1% EXPANCEL particles as first particles. The HP/OP coatings were tested for durability using a Taber Abraser equipped with CS-10 wheels and a 1,000 g load. The results are shown in Table 14.
Coatings were prepared using first components comprising maleated SBCs (e.g., maleated SEBS block copolymers)
The HP/OP coatings were tested for durability using a Taber Abraser equipped with CS-10 wheels and a 1,000 g load. The results are shown in Table 14.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/663,985, filed Jun. 25, 2012; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/708,760, filed Oct. 2, 2012; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/768,290, filed Feb. 22, 2013, the entirety of each of which application is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 870439 | Kade | Nov 1907 | A |
| 2191701 | Wood | Feb 1940 | A |
| 2976386 | Salton Lewis | Mar 1961 | A |
| 3185426 | Bjerke | May 1965 | A |
| 3212106 | Noel | Oct 1965 | A |
| 3244541 | Fain et al. | Apr 1966 | A |
| 3354022 | Dettre et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
| 3579540 | Ohlhausen | May 1971 | A |
| 3716502 | Loew | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3931428 | Reick | Jan 1976 | A |
| 3950588 | McDougal | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3963349 | Albright et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3967030 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3975197 | Mikelsons | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3976572 | Reick | Aug 1976 | A |
| 3980153 | Andrews | Sep 1976 | A |
| 4142724 | Reick | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4151327 | Lawton | Apr 1979 | A |
| 4199142 | Reick | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4301197 | Franz et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4301213 | Davies | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4308353 | Saito et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4311755 | Rummel | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4377665 | Shiraki et al. | Mar 1983 | A |
| 4397988 | Sherman | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4415405 | Ruddle et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4451619 | Heilmann et al. | May 1984 | A |
| 4453533 | Scheidler et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4474852 | Craig | Oct 1984 | A |
| 4492217 | Scheidler | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4536454 | Haasl | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4581149 | Horodysky et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4591530 | Lui | May 1986 | A |
| 4614464 | Christensen | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4624900 | Fau | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4646948 | Jennings | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4680173 | Burger | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4687707 | Matsuo et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4716183 | Gamarra et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4733843 | Bessinger | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4738426 | Bessinger | Apr 1988 | A |
| D295950 | Johnston | May 1988 | S |
| 4745139 | Haasl | May 1988 | A |
| 4749110 | Maeno et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4753977 | Merrill | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4782112 | Kondo et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4835014 | Roth et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4837260 | Sato et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4855176 | Ohwaki et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4870907 | McKee | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4923260 | Poulsen | May 1990 | A |
| 4971912 | Buhl et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4983459 | Franz et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
| 5011727 | Kido et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5011963 | Ogawa et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5032641 | Nanishi et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5041304 | Kusano et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
| 5057050 | Hill | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5084191 | Nagase et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5104938 | Toyama et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5112911 | Mori et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5121134 | Albinson et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5156611 | Haynes et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
| 5192603 | Slater et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5202361 | Zimmerman et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5212215 | Nanri et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5225274 | Ogawa et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5228764 | Cherry et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5228905 | Grunewalder et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5238746 | Soga et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5240774 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5274159 | Pellerite et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5284707 | Ogawa et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5294252 | Gun | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5300239 | Ozaki et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5308705 | Franz et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5312573 | Rosenbaum et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5314940 | Stone | May 1994 | A |
| 5316799 | Brunken et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5317129 | Taplan et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5324566 | Ogawa et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5328768 | Goodwin | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5338345 | Scarborough et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5348547 | Payne et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5352733 | Hart | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5362145 | Bird et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5364299 | Hill et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5366810 | Merrifield et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5368892 | Berquier | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5372888 | Ogawa et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5380585 | Ogawa et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5385966 | Hermansen et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5395657 | Strepparola et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5424130 | Nakanishi et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5429433 | Bird et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5435839 | Ogawa | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5437894 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5437900 | Kuzowski | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5441338 | Kane et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5441809 | Akhter | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5458976 | Horino et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5466770 | Audenaert et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5489328 | Ono et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5500216 | Julian et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
| 5527536 | Merkle et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5534580 | Mitsui et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5539054 | LaFleur | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5540493 | Kane et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5556667 | Teranishi et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5558940 | Michels et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5564809 | Kane et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5576096 | Ono et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5578361 | Tsujioka et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5584957 | Schultheis et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5585896 | Yamazaki et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5599893 | Asai et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5612433 | Ono et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5618627 | Merrifield et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5618883 | Plamthottam et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5651921 | Kaijou | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5658969 | Gerace | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5674967 | Goodwin | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5679460 | Schakenraad et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5688864 | Goodwin | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5697991 | Frazer | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5707740 | Goodwin | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5719226 | Kegley | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5725789 | Huber et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5735589 | Herrmann et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5747561 | Smirnov et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5753734 | Maruyama | May 1998 | A |
| 5777043 | Shafer et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5798144 | Varanasi et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5800918 | Chartier et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5813741 | Fish et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814411 | Merrifield et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5824421 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5830529 | Ross | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5840201 | Elledge | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5843338 | Inoue et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5853690 | Hibino et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5853800 | Dombrowski et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5856378 | Ring et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5858551 | Salsman | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5876806 | Ogawa | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5890907 | Minasian | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5910557 | Audenaert et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5921411 | Merl | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5924359 | Watanabe | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5945482 | Fukuchi et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5947574 | Avendano | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5948685 | Angros | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5952053 | Colby | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5958601 | Salsman | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5980990 | Goodwin | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6013724 | Mizutani et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6017609 | Akamatsu et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6017831 | Beardsley et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6017997 | Snow et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6020419 | Bock et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6024948 | Samain et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6025025 | Bartrug et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6033738 | Teranishi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6040382 | Hanes | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6045650 | Mitchnick et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6068911 | Shouji et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6090447 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6093559 | Bookbinder et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6096380 | Takebe et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6105233 | Neal | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6114446 | Narisawa et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6117555 | Fujimori et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6119626 | Miyazawa et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120720 | Meier et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6136210 | Biegelsen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6153304 | Smith et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6162870 | Yamada et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6187143 | Juppo et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6191122 | Lux et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
| 6201058 | Mahr et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6207236 | Araki et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6214278 | Yamada et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6221434 | Visca et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6224974 | Wuu | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6228435 | Yoshikawa et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6228972 | Hikita et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235383 | Hong et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235833 | Akamatsu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6245387 | Hayden | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6248850 | Arai | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6264751 | Kamura et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6280834 | Veerasamy et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6288149 | Kroll | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6291054 | Thomas et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6333074 | Ogawa et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6333558 | Hasegawa | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6337133 | Akamatsu et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6340502 | Azzopardi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6342268 | Samain | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6352758 | Huang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6358569 | Badyal et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6361868 | Bier et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6376592 | Shimada et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6379751 | Schaefer et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6383642 | Le Bellac et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6403397 | Katz | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6410673 | Arai et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6419985 | Ishizuka | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6423372 | Genzer et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6423381 | Colton et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6432181 | Ludwig | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6451432 | Azzopardi et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6458420 | Akamatsu et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6458467 | Mizuno et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6461537 | Turcotte et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6461670 | Akamatsu et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6462115 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6471761 | Fan et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
| 6476095 | Simendinger, III | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6479612 | Del Pesco et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6482524 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6488347 | Bienick | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6559234 | Arai et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6564935 | Yamamoto et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6566453 | Arai et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6579620 | Mizunno et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6582825 | Amarasekera et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6584744 | Schultheis et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6589641 | Stirniman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6596060 | Michaud | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6610363 | Arora et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
| 6613860 | Dams et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6623863 | Kamitani et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
| 6641654 | Akamatsu et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6649222 | D'Agostino et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6652640 | Asai et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6660339 | Datta et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6660363 | Barthlott | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6660686 | Inagaki et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6683126 | Keller et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6685992 | Ogawa et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6689200 | Scarborough et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6692565 | Johansen, Jr. et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6706798 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6720371 | Furuta et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6729704 | Ames | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6733892 | Yoneda et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6743467 | Jones et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6767984 | Toui et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6770323 | Genzer et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6780497 | Walter | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6786562 | Obrock et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6793821 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6800354 | Baumann et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6806299 | Baumann et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6808835 | Green et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
| 6811716 | Stengaard et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
| 6811844 | Trouilhet | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6811884 | Goodwin | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6835778 | Swisher et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 6845788 | Extrand | Jan 2005 | B2 |
| 6852389 | Nun et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6852390 | Extrand | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6855375 | Nakagawa et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6855759 | Kudo et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6858284 | Nun et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6871923 | Dietz et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6872441 | Baumann et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6890360 | Cote et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6923216 | Extrand et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6926946 | Ogawa et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6931888 | Shekunov et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6938774 | Extrand | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6942746 | Niejelow et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6966990 | Chattopadhyay et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6976585 | Extrand | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6976998 | Rizzo et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6982242 | Liss et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 6994045 | Paszkowski | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 6998051 | Chattopadhyay et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7004184 | Handique et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7019069 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7022416 | Teranishi | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7026018 | Kranovich | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7037591 | Henze et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7048889 | Arney et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7052244 | Fouillet et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7056409 | Dubrow | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7057832 | Wu et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7057881 | Chow et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7074273 | Shimomura et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7074294 | Dubrow | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7083748 | Chattopadhyay et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7083828 | Muller et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7109256 | Amano et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7112369 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
| 7124450 | Davidson | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7141276 | Lehmann et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7144947 | Camus et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7148181 | Tanaka et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7150904 | D'Urso et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7153357 | Baumgart et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7157018 | Scheidler | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7166235 | Majeti et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7175723 | Jones et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7179758 | Chakrapani et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7179864 | Wang | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7188917 | Bienick | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7198855 | Liebmann-Vinson et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7204298 | Hodes et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
| 7211223 | Fouillet et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7211313 | Nun et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7211329 | Metz et al | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7211605 | Coronado et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7213309 | Wang et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| D547640 | Remmers | Jul 2007 | S |
| 7238751 | Wang et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7253130 | Chiang et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7258731 | D'Urso et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7264845 | Papadaki et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7265180 | Chang et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7265468 | Mancl et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
| 7268179 | Brown | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7273658 | Benayoun et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 7285331 | Reihs et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
| 7288311 | Kawashima et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7288592 | Stark et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7291653 | Baumann et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7306895 | Kano et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7309278 | Shibata | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7312057 | Bookbinder et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 7323033 | Kroupenkine et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7338835 | Bao | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7342551 | King | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7344619 | Helmeke | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7344758 | Franchina et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7344783 | Shea | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7354328 | Lee | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7354624 | Millero et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| 7354650 | Nakajima et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
| D568344 | Baacke et al. | May 2008 | S |
| 7368510 | Lee et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7393515 | Hoshino et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
| 7396395 | Chen et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7419615 | Strauss | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 7449233 | Arora | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7468333 | Kimbrell, Jr. et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7524531 | Axtell, III et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7527832 | Sakoske et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7531598 | Müller et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
| 7544411 | Baumann et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| D596931 | Fernandez | Jul 2009 | S |
| D596932 | Kleinsasser | Jul 2009 | S |
| 7563505 | Reihs | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7568583 | Wing et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
| 7607744 | Casoli et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| D607020 | Baacke et al. | Dec 2009 | S |
| D612404 | Picken et al. | Mar 2010 | S |
| D612405 | Eicher | Mar 2010 | S |
| D613316 | Schmidt | Apr 2010 | S |
| 7726615 | Rutz | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7731316 | Wing | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7748806 | Egan | Jul 2010 | B2 |
| 7919180 | Furukawa | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| 7989619 | Guire et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 8258206 | Kanagasabapathy et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
| 8286561 | Driver et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
| 8580884 | Ding | Nov 2013 | B2 |
| 8596205 | Driver et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
| 8715906 | Blanchet et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
| 8779025 | Stone | Jul 2014 | B1 |
| 9067821 | Bleecher et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
| 9096786 | Sikka et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
| 9139744 | Sikka et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
| 20010018130 | Hayden | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010019773 | Akamatsu et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010024728 | Kamitani et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010030808 | Komatsu et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
| 20010055677 | Wuu | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020001676 | Hayden | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20020034627 | Jacquiod et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020045007 | Arora et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020049276 | Zwick | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020077412 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020111402 | Mizuno et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020115736 | Koshy | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020161130 | Arai et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20020177655 | Pratt et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20020192472 | Metz et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020197490 | Amidaiji et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030009049 | Smith et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030013795 | Nun et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030021902 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030026972 | Reihs | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030040243 | Ward | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030040568 | Furuta et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065093 | Custro et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030070677 | Handique et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030072723 | Gers-Barlag et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030073067 | Bookfinder et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030077533 | Murota et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030091809 | Scarborough et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110976 | Abidh et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030117051 | Kweon | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030119684 | Tsao | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030125656 | Davankov et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030143339 | Kobayashi | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149218 | Cote' et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030166840 | Urry et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030170401 | Shimomura et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030176572 | Maekawa et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030179494 | Kaneko | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030194565 | Schaefer | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20030203771 | Rosenberg et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040005469 | Metz et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040020104 | Feldhege et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040025747 | Kamitani et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040039128 | Sasagawa et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| 20040050297 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040053058 | Kamitani et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040056575 | Dietz et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040097616 | Hoppler et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040102124 | Suzuki | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040102588 | Arai et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040121168 | Goodwin et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040137814 | Kimbrell, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040138083 | Kimbrell, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040142557 | Levy et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
| 20040154106 | Oles et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040192844 | Ikematsu et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040201048 | Seki et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040202872 | Fang et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040209203 | Kano et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040213904 | Muller et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040216227 | Papadaki et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050000463 | Mochizuki | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050004264 | Tanabe | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050008859 | Forgacs | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050009953 | Shea | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050020763 | Milic | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050022313 | Scheidler | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050053793 | Benay-Oun et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075020 | Benayoun et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050075455 | Chang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050106762 | Chakrapani et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050121782 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050143547 | Stark et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050165194 | Benayoun et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050170098 | Baumann et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050197447 | Gu et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050221098 | Azzopardi et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050239211 | Uchihara et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050245395 | Tanaka et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060013983 | Sebastian et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060029808 | Zhai et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060040164 | Vyas et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060051561 | Badyal | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060052556 | Franchina et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060057390 | Kittle et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060058458 | Hasskerl et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060062695 | Haab et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060062929 | Kittle et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060081394 | Li et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060089466 | Shimomura et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060110541 | Russell et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060110542 | Dietz et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
| 20060113443 | Remmers | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060147634 | Strauss | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060147705 | Huang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060151739 | Sandner et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060154048 | Teranishi et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060162373 | McMillin et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060172641 | Hennige et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060185555 | Giessler et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060205874 | Uzee et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060207032 | Reiners et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060213791 | Holden | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060213792 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060213849 | Bienick | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20060222865 | Hoshino et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060240218 | Parce | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060263516 | Jones et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060266258 | Asakura et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060269758 | Helmeke | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060281889 | Kobayashi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060286305 | Thies et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20060292345 | Dave et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070003705 | Strauss | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070005024 | Weber et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070009657 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070014970 | Nun et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070026193 | Luzinov et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070036906 | Reeve | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070046160 | Egan | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070065668 | Idei | Mar 2007 | A1 |
| 20070075199 | Stewart et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070141114 | Muisener et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070141306 | Kasai et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070148407 | Chen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070166513 | Sheng et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172650 | O'Rear, III et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172658 | Deruelle et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070172661 | Fechner et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070176379 | Sonnendorfer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070196656 | Rowell | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070202342 | Whiteford et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070213230 | Pfeiffer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070215004 | Kuroda et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070218265 | Harris et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070224898 | Deangelis et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070231517 | Golownia | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070238807 | Safir et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070259156 | Kempers et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070274871 | Jiang | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070275245 | Persson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070298216 | Jing et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080008838 | Arpac et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080012459 | Picken et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080015306 | Wright et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080018709 | Takenaka et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080020127 | Whiteford et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080021212 | Whiteford et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080032403 | Saito et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080039558 | Lazzari et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080039576 | Griswold et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080044635 | O'Neill et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080050567 | Kawashima et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080063870 | O'Rear et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080066648 | Asakura et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080070146 | Fomitchev et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080081858 | Okazaki | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080088192 | Hsu | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080090004 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
| 20080101041 | Chang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080102347 | Blunk | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080107864 | Zhang et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080131653 | Lyons et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20080160257 | Takada et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080166549 | Shieh et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080171805 | Mingarelli | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080172937 | Palmer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080176991 | Osawa et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080193740 | Nesbitt | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080197760 | Leconte et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080199657 | Capron et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080199659 | Zhao | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080205950 | Moorlag et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080206550 | Borlner | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080207581 | Whiteford et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080213601 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080220170 | Van Der Flaas | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080220676 | Marin et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080221009 | Kanagasabapathy et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080221263 | Kanagasabapathy et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080226694 | Gelbert et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
| 20080237126 | Hoek et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080241512 | Boris et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080241523 | Huignard et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080245273 | Vyorkka et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080246804 | Kawase et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080248263 | Kobrin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080250978 | Baumgart et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080261024 | Xenopoulos et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080268233 | Lawin et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080269358 | Inoue et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20080280699 | Jarvholm | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080286556 | D'Urso et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
| 20080295347 | Braham | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080296252 | D'Urso et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080306202 | Lin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080310660 | Lin | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090010870 | Greiner et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090011222 | Xiu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090011227 | Furukawa | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090011960 | Wu | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090018249 | Kanagasabapathy et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090025508 | Liao et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090025609 | Egami et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090032088 | Rabinowitz | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090035519 | Gaeta et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090036978 | Kleiner et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090042469 | Simpson | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090058247 | Collins et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090064894 | Baumgart et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090076430 | Simpson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| 20090084574 | Balfour et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090084914 | Picken et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090085453 | Daley et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090087670 | Peng et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090095941 | Nakata et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090099301 | Naraghi et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090105409 | Munzmay et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090105679 | Joubert et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090111344 | Murphy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090115302 | Benz et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090123728 | Cheung et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090134758 | Vardon | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090136737 | Ring et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090142604 | Imai et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090155566 | Gentleman et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090162592 | Baikerikar et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090163637 | Li et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
| 20090182085 | Escobar Barrios et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090186070 | Guire et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090188877 | Stewart | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20090193743 | Wiercinski | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090195136 | Wing et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090208739 | Husemann et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090212505 | McMillin et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
| 20090240004 | Maier et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20090263604 | Arai et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
| 20090286023 | Dobreski et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090298369 | Koene et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090324910 | Gemici et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20100001625 | Eckartsberg et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100003493 | Cheng et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100004373 | Zhu et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100006223 | Krawinkel et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100026156 | Leconte et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
| 20100052491 | Vardon | Mar 2010 | A1 |
| 20100102693 | Driver et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100109498 | Ramm et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100117502 | Kang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100133970 | Shin et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100176703 | Kim | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100181884 | De La Garza et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
| 20100196702 | Furukawa | Aug 2010 | A9 |
| 20100213334 | Davenport | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100272913 | Russell et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
| 20100314575 | Gao et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100330347 | Badyal et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110020637 | Ikishima et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110027531 | Uchida et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110033662 | Ikishima et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| 20110111656 | Gao et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110184082 | Wright et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| 20110217544 | Young et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
| 20110243985 | Pagani et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110251318 | Ishizaki et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110303156 | Sikka et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20110313082 | Popp | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120009396 | Sikka et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
| 20120040577 | Kissel et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120045954 | Bleecher et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20130139309 | Bleecher et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
| 20130216820 | Riddle et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
| 20140087134 | Gesford et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
| 20140296409 | Sikka et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
| 20140349061 | Sikka et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
| 20150005424 | Jones et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150030779 | Bleecher et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
| 20150097475 | Sikka et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1002256 | Dec 1976 | CA |
| 2175848 | Dec 1996 | CA |
| 2796305 | Dec 2011 | CA |
| 10306891 | Aug 2004 | DE |
| 10 2010 022 265 | May 2010 | DE |
| 0 166 363 | Jan 1986 | EP |
| 0 207 282 | Jul 1987 | EP |
| 0 307 915 | Mar 1989 | EP |
| 0 317 057 | May 1989 | EP |
| 0 332 141 | Sep 1989 | EP |
| 0 386 991 | Sep 1990 | EP |
| 0 399 568 | Nov 1990 | EP |
| 0 446 391 | Sep 1991 | EP |
| 0 452 723 | Oct 1991 | EP |
| 0 472 215 | Feb 1992 | EP |
| 0 476 510 | Mar 1992 | EP |
| 0 493 270 | Jul 1992 | EP |
| 0 545 201 | Jun 1993 | EP |
| 0 623 656 | Nov 1994 | EP |
| 0 649 887 | Apr 1995 | EP |
| 0 657 393 | Jun 1995 | EP |
| 0 714 870 | Jun 1996 | EP |
| 0 714 921 | Jun 1996 | EP |
| 0 719 743 | Jul 1996 | EP |
| 0 719 821 | Jul 1996 | EP |
| 0 739 714 | Oct 1996 | EP |
| 0 745 567 | Dec 1996 | EP |
| 0 745 568 | Dec 1996 | EP |
| 0 752 459 | Jan 1997 | EP |
| 0 770 706 | May 1997 | EP |
| 0 904 343 | May 1997 | EP |
| 0 799 791 | Oct 1997 | EP |
| 0 811 430 | Dec 1997 | EP |
| 0 863 191 | Sep 1998 | EP |
| 0 969 718 | Sep 1998 | EP |
| 0 903 389 | Mar 1999 | EP |
| 0 914 873 | May 1999 | EP |
| 0 915 103 | May 1999 | EP |
| 0 930 351 | Jul 1999 | EP |
| 1 047 735 | Nov 2000 | EP |
| 1 048 696 | Nov 2000 | EP |
| 1 097 979 | May 2001 | EP |
| 1 108 735 | Jun 2001 | EP |
| 1 113 064 | Jul 2001 | EP |
| 1 136 539 | Sep 2001 | EP |
| 1 180 533 | Feb 2002 | EP |
| 1 187 872 | Mar 2002 | EP |
| 1 193 289 | Apr 2002 | EP |
| 1 215 252 | Jun 2002 | EP |
| 1 401 903 | Sep 2002 | EP |
| 1 261 559 | Dec 2002 | EP |
| 1 392 619 | Dec 2002 | EP |
| 1 392 772 | Dec 2002 | EP |
| 1 429 919 | Feb 2003 | EP |
| 1 492 837 | Oct 2003 | EP |
| 1 360 253 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1 362 904 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1 503 813 | Nov 2003 | EP |
| 1 387 011 | Feb 2004 | EP |
| 1 387 169 | Feb 2004 | EP |
| 1 407 792 | Apr 2004 | EP |
| 1 433 821 | Jun 2004 | EP |
| 1 583 615 | Jul 2004 | EP |
| 1 473 355 | Nov 2004 | EP |
| 1 475 234 | Nov 2004 | EP |
| 1 479 738 | Nov 2004 | EP |
| 1 524 290 | Apr 2005 | EP |
| 1 875 279 | Nov 2006 | EP |
| 1 883 669 | Nov 2006 | EP |
| 1 902 091 | Jan 2007 | EP |
| 1 752 284 | Feb 2007 | EP |
| 1 857 497 | Nov 2007 | EP |
| 1 873 218 | Jan 2008 | EP |
| 1 908 804 | Apr 2008 | EP |
| 1 988 129 | Nov 2008 | EP |
| 1 997 619 | Dec 2008 | EP |
| 2 346 678 | Jul 2011 | EP |
| 2 678 400 | Aug 2012 | EP |
| 2 547 832 AO | Jan 2013 | EP |
| 1 902 091 | May 2013 | EP |
| 2 791 255 | Jun 2013 | EP |
| 2 864 430 AO | Apr 2015 | EP |
| 1 341 605 | Dec 1973 | GB |
| 1 465 495 | Feb 1977 | GB |
| 2 484 751 | Apr 2012 | GB |
| 62-246960 | Oct 1987 | JP |
| H05-186738 | Jul 1993 | JP |
| H07-090691 | Apr 1995 | JP |
| H10-309768 | Nov 1998 | JP |
| 2002-020575 | Oct 2002 | JP |
| 2004162133 | Jun 2004 | JP |
| 2004-143352 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2004308984 | Nov 2004 | JP |
| 2005082616 | Mar 2005 | JP |
| 2006131938 | May 2006 | JP |
| 2006-176559 | Sep 2006 | JP |
| 2007144917 | Jun 2007 | JP |
| 2007182491 | Jul 2007 | JP |
| 2008228958 | Oct 2008 | JP |
| 2009071672 | Apr 2009 | JP |
| 2009-120792 | Sep 2009 | JP |
| 10-2003-052853 | Jun 2003 | KR |
| 10-2009-90240 | Oct 2010 | KR |
| 175646 | Aug 1994 | MX |
| 183533 | Dec 1996 | MX |
| 192053 | May 1999 | MX |
| 195031 | Jan 2000 | MX |
| 199899 | Nov 2000 | MX |
| 201072 | Mar 2001 | MX |
| 203880 | Aug 2001 | MX |
| 205074 | Nov 2001 | MX |
| PA01011653 | Dec 2002 | MX |
| 215752 | Aug 2003 | MX |
| PA02006399 | Sep 2003 | MX |
| PA04010165 | Feb 2005 | MX |
| PA05006898 | Aug 2005 | MX |
| PA02012841 | Jan 2006 | MX |
| 234477 | Feb 2006 | MX |
| PA06003323 | Mar 2006 | MX |
| WO 8605389 | Sep 1986 | WO |
| WO 91-04305 | Apr 1991 | WO |
| WO 93-16131 | Aug 1993 | WO |
| WO 94-13734 | Jun 1994 | WO |
| WO 96-04123 | Feb 1996 | WO |
| WO 96-07621 | Mar 1996 | WO |
| WO 97-07993 | Mar 1997 | WO |
| WO 98-20960 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO 99-23137 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO 99-23437 | May 1999 | WO |
| WO 99-40431 | Aug 1999 | WO |
| WO 99-47578 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 99-48339 | Sep 1999 | WO |
| WO 99-57185 | Nov 1999 | WO |
| WO 99-64363 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO 00-05321 | Feb 2000 | WO |
| WO 00-14297 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 00-25938 | May 2000 | WO |
| WO 00-34361 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO 00-39240 | Jul 2000 | WO |
| WO 00-46464 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| WO 00-66241 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 01-19745 | Mar 2001 | WO |
| WO 01-62682 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 01-74739 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO 01-79142 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO 01-79371 | Oct 2001 | WO |
| WO 01-98399 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| WO 02-14417 | Feb 2002 | WO |
| WO 02-28951 | Apr 2002 | WO |
| WO 02-062910 | Aug 2002 | WO |
| WO 02-074869 | Sep 2002 | WO |
| WO 02-098983 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO 03-010255 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 03-012004 | Feb 2003 | WO |
| WO 03-030879 | Apr 2003 | WO |
| WO 03-037702 | May 2003 | WO |
| WO 03-045693 | Jun 2003 | WO |
| WO 03-063646 | Aug 2003 | WO |
| WO 03-080258 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO 03-082998 | Oct 2003 | WO |
| WO 03-093568 | Nov 2003 | WO |
| WO 2004-012625 | Feb 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004-043319 | May 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004-058418 | Jul 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004-104116 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO 2004-110132 | Dec 2004 | WO |
| WO 2005-021843 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005-023935 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005-028562 | Mar 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005-068399 | Jul 2005 | WO |
| WO 2005-077429 | Aug 2005 | WO |
| WO 2006044641 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006-044642 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006-081891 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006-083600 | Aug 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006-101934 | Sep 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006-135755 | Dec 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007-011731 | Jan 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007-027276 | Mar 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007-052260 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007-053266 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007-056427 | May 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007-070801 | Jun 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007-075407 | Jul 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007-092746 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007-102960 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007-104494 | Sep 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007-126432 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007-126743 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007-130294 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007-149617 | Dec 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008-004827 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-004828 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-006078 | Jan 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-021791 | Feb 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-035347 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-035917 | Mar 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-050895 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-051221 | May 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-066828 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-078346 | Jul 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-106494 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-112158 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-123650 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-123955 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-123961 | Oct 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-134243 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-137973 | Nov 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-151991 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2008-153687 | Dec 2008 | WO |
| WO 2009-003847 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009-005465 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009-012116 | Jan 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009-018327 | Feb 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009-032988 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009-037717 | Mar 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009-041752 | Apr 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009-061199 | May 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009-148611 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2009-158567 | Dec 2009 | WO |
| WO 2010033288 | Mar 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010042191 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO2010042191 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2010-042668 | Apr 2010 | WO |
| WO 2011-116005 | Sep 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011116005 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| WO 2011-151151 | Dec 2011 | WO |
| WO 2012-115986 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| WO 2013-090939 | Jun 2013 | WO |
| WO 2014-003852 | Jan 2014 | WO |
| WO 2015-048539 | Apr 2015 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| EXPANCEL DE product list, Oct. 2010. |
| Yield strength, elastic limit, and ultimate strength NPL document, retrieved Mar. 20, 2015. |
| Machine translation of JP 2004-143352, retrieved Aug. 6, 2015. |
| Machine translation of DE 10306891, retrieved Aug. 6, 2015. |
| Machine translation of JP 2006-176559, retrieved Aug. 6, 2015. |
| Machine translation of JP 2009-120792, retrieved Aug. 6, 2015. |
| Machine translation of JP 2002-020575, retrieved Aug. 6, 2015. |
| Prosecution History U.S. Appl. No. 14/323,660 Aug. 2015. |
| Prosecution History EP Patent Application No. 13 809 987.4 Aug. 2015. |
| KratonI M FG1901 Data Document Jun. 17, 2014. |
| KratonI M Polymers for Modification of Thermoplastics—available on the world wide web at http://docs.kraton.com/kraton/attachments/downloads/81311AM.pdf, last accessed Aug. 3, 2015. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/699,200, filed Jul. 14, 2005, Guire et al. (Innovative Surface Technologies, Inc.). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/807,143, filed Jul. 12, 2006, Guire et al. (Innovative Surface Technologies, Inc.). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/891,876, filed Feb. 27, 2007, Lawin et al. (Innovative Surface Technology, Inc.). |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/058,902, filed Jun. 4, 2008, Driver et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/090,002, filed Aug. 19, 2008, Driver et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/133,273, filed Jun. 27, 2008, Driver et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/198,414, filed Jun. 16, 2009, Gao. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/216,540, filed May 18, 2009, Driver et al. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 61/252,229, filed Oct. 16, 2009, Gao. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 12/037,520 file history, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,943,234, filed Feb. 26, 2008, Lawin et al. |
| “Composition,” in Collins English Dictionary, found at http://www.credoreference.com/entry/hcengdict/composition, 2000 (viewed Aug. 26, 2013). |
| “NeverWet—product characteristics,” found at http://www.neverwet.com/product-characteristics.php, NeverWet LLC (viewed Mar. 7, 2013). |
| “Yield strength, elastic limit, and ultimate strength,” found at http://inventor.grantadesign.com/en/notes/science/material/S04%20strength.htm, Granta Design Ltd. (viewed Feb. 10, 2015). |
| 2009 R&D 100 Award Entry Form (p. 5 excerpt from another document) showing Fig. 1 Schematic of NICE (“no ice nanocoating”) (2009). |
| Bae et al., “Superhydrophobicity of cotton fabrics treated with silica nanoparticles and water-repellent agent,” J Colloid Interface Sci, abstract only (May 3, 2009; epublication ahead of print). |
| Bayer Materials Science product information on Bayhydrol® 110 polyurethane dispersion (two first pages of this brochure) (Aug. 2002). |
| Bayer Materials Science product information on Bayhydrol® 122 polyurethane dispersion (Jan. 2004). |
| Bayer Materials Science product information on Bayhydrol® 124 polyurethane dispersion (Jan. 2004). |
| Bayer Materials Science product information on Bayhydrol® 140AQ, polyurethane dispersion (Aug. 2002). |
| Bayer Materials Science product information on Bayhydrol® A145, aqueous hydroxyl-functional polyurethane dispersion (Jan. 2010). |
| Beyler et al, “Thermal Decomposition of Polymers,” Chapter 7 of The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering (3rd ed.), pp. 1-110-1-131 (2002). |
| Bliznakov et al., “Double-scale roughness and superhydrophobicity on metalized Toray carbon fiber paper,” Langmuir, 25(8):4760-4766, abstract only (Apr. 21, 2009). |
| Boinovich et al., “Principles of design of superhydrophobic coatings by deposition from dispersions,” Langmuir, 25(5):2907-2912, abstract only (Mar. 3, 2009). |
| Boinovich et al., “Principles of Design of Superhydrophobic Coatings by Deposition from Dispersions,” Langmuir, abstract only (Feb. 10, 2009; epublication ahead of print). |
| Bravo et al., “Transparent superhydrophobic films based on silica nanoparticles,” Langmuir, 23(13):7293-7298, abstract only (Jun. 19, 2007; epublished May 25, 2007). |
| Choi et al., “Large slip of aqueous liquid flow over a nanoengineered superhydrophobic surface,” Phys Rev Lett, 96(6):066001, abstract only (Feb. 17, 2006; epublished Feb. 16, 2006). |
| Clark, M.D.T. et al. “Paints and Pigments” available at nzic.org.nz/ChemProcesses/polymers/10D.pdf (copyright 2005-2008 at http://nzic.org.nz/ChemProcesses/polymers/). |
| de Givenchy et al., “Fabrication of Superhydrophobic PDMS Surfaces by Combining Acidic Treatment and Perfluorinated Monolayers,” Langmuir, 25(11):6448-6453, abstract only (Jun. 2, 2009). |
| Du, “Surfactants, Dispersants, and Defoamers for the Coatings, Inks, and Adhesives Industries,” in Coatings Technology Handbook, Third Edition, Tracton (ed.), CRC Press (2005). |
| EPO Communication dated Dec. 5, 2011, regarding third-party observations filed in European Application No. 09771098.2. |
| Extended European search report for European Application No. 920119918, dated Jul. 22, 1997. |
| Extended European search report for European Application No. 09771098.2, dated Dec. 27, 2011. |
| Extended European search report for European Application No. 09819518, dated Jul. 22, 2014. |
| Fürstner et al., “Wetting and self-cleaning properties of artificial superhydrophobic surfaces,” Langmuir, 21(3):956-961, abstract only (Feb. 1, 2005). |
| García et al., “Use of p-toluenesulfonic acid for the controlled grafting of alkoxysilanes onto silanol containing surfaces; preparation of tunable hydrophilic, hydrophobic, and super-hydrophobic silica,” J Am Chem Soc, 129(16):5052-5060, abstract only (Apr. 25, 2007; epublished Mar. 31, 2007). |
| Gonçalves et al., “Superhydrophobic cellulose nanocomposites,” J. Colloid Interface Sci, 324(1-2):42-46, abstract only (Aug. 2008; epublished May 7, 2008). |
| Guo et al., “A novel approach to stable superhydrophobic surfaces,” Chemphyschem, 7(8):1674-1677, abstract only (Aug. 11, 2006; epublished Jul. 17, 2006). |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2009/048775, dated Jan. 13, 2011. |
| International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/US2010/059909, dated Apr. 21, 2011. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/005512, dated Dec. 8, 2009. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/048775, dated Nov. 19, 2009. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2009/059909, dated Dec. 4, 2009. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/048711, dated Mar. 17, 2011. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/054936, dated Feb. 16, 2011. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/070200, dated Feb. 27, 2013. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2012/025982, dated Jun. 13, 2012. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2013/031751, dated Dec. 23, 2013. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/057848, dated Dec. 29, 2014. |
| Jauregui-Beloqui et al., “Thermoplastic polyurethane-fumed silica composites: influence of the specific surface area of fumed silica on the viscoelastic and adhesion properties,” Journal of Adhesive Science and Technology, 13(6):695-711, abstract only (1999). |
| Kietzig et al., “Patterned superhydrophobic metallic surfaces,” Langmuir, 25(8):4821-4827, abstract only (Apr. 21, 2009). |
| Kim et al., “A simple fabrication route to a highly transparent super-hydrophobic surface with a poly(dimethylsiloxane) coated flexible mold,” Chem Commun (Camb), 22:2237-2239, abstract only (Jun. 14, 2007; epublished Mar. 6, 2007). |
| Kraton® FG1924 G Polymer, Data Document, Identifier K123DDe09U, the KRATON Polymers Group of Companies (Aug. 10, 2009). |
| Le Marechal et al., “Textile Finishing Industry as an Important Source of Organic Pollutants,” in Organic Pollutants Ten Years After the Stockholm Convention—Environmental and Analytical Update, Puzyn (ed.), Chapter 2, pp. 29-54, InTech (2012). |
| Lee et al., “Impact of a superhydrophobic sphere onto water,” Langmuir, 24(1):142-145, abstract only (Jan. 1, 2008; epublished Nov. 14, 2007). |
| Li et al., “Conversion of a metastable superhydrophobic surface to an ultraphobic surface,” Langmuir, 24(15):8008-8012, abstract only (Aug. 5, 2008; epublished Jul. 8, 2008). |
| Ling et al., “Stable and transparent superhydrophobic nanoparticle films,” Langmuir, 25(5):3260-3263, abstract only (Mar. 3, 2009). |
| Litvinov et al., “Structure of a PDMS Layer Grafted onto a Silica Surface Studied by Means of DSC and Solid-State NMR,” Macromolecules, 35(11):4356-4364 (2002). |
| Manca et al., “Durable superhydrophobic and antireflective surfaces by trimethylsilanized silica nanoparticles-based sol-gel processing,” Langmuir, 25(11):6357-6362, abstract only (Jun. 2, 2009). |
| Marmur, “Super-hydrophobicity fundamentals: implications to biofouling prevention,” Biofouling, 22(1-2):107-115, abstract only (2006). |
| Ming et al., “Toward Superlyophobic Surfaces,” Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion (ed. Mittal), vol. 6, pp. 191-205, Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden (2009). |
| Nosonovsky et al., “Patterned nonadhesive surfaces: superhydrophobicity and wetting regime transitions,” Langmuir, 24(4):1525-1533, abstract only (Feb. 19, 2008; epublished Dec. 12, 2007). |
| Park et al., “Wetting transition and optimal design for microstructured surfaces with hydrophobic and hydrophilic materials,” J. Colloid Interface Sci, 336(1):298-303, abstract only (Aug. 1, 2009; epublished Apr. 15, 2009). |
| Perez, Jr., et al., “Performance and Processing Enhancements of Aromatic Polyurea Elastomer Systems Prepared from High 2,4'-MDI Isocyanates,” in Polyurethanes Conference 2000: Defining the Future Through Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 219-232 (Oct. 8-11, 2000). |
| Piret et al., “Biomolecule and nanoparticle transfer on patterned and heterogeneously wetted superhydrophobic silicon nanowire surfaces,” Langmuir, 24(5):1670-1672, abstract only (Mar. 4, 2008; epublished Feb. 6, 2008). |
| Puukilainen et al., “Superhydrophobic polyolefin surfaces: controlled micro- and nanostructures,” Langmuir, 23(13):7263-7268, abstract only (Jun. 19, 2007; epublished May 23, 2007). |
| Sakai et al., “Direct observation of internal fluidity in a water droplet during sliding on hydrophobic surfaces,” Langmuir, 22(11):4906-4909, abstract only (May 23, 2006). |
| Sherwin Williams Chemical Coatings product information for CC-D14, POLANE® 2.8T, plus polyurethane enamel (Oct. 19, 2006). |
| Sherwin Williams Chemical Coatings product information for CC-D5, POLANE® T, polyurethane enamel (Sep. 2001). |
| Sherwin Williams Chemical Coatings product information for CC-E14, POLANE® 700T, water reducible enamel (May 2010). |
| Shirtcliffe et al., “Wetting and wetting transitions on copper-based super-hydrophobic surfaces,” Langmuir, 21(3):937-943, abstract only (Feb. 1, 2005). |
| Smith et al., “Modeling of PDMS—Silica Nanocomposites,” NSTI-Nanotech, 3:115-118 (2004). |
| SSW Holding Company, Inc. v. Schott Gemtron Corporation, Civil Docket, Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-00661-CRS (as of Dec. 6, 2013). |
| SSW Holding Company, Inc. v. Schott Gemtron Corporation, Complaint for Patent Infringement, Demand for Jury Trial, Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-00661-CRS (Oct. 16, 2012). |
| Su et al., “From Suerhydrophophilic to Superhydrophobic: Controlling Wettability of Hydroxide Zinc Carbonate Film on Zinc Plates,” Langmuir, abstract only (Feb. 10, 2009; epublication ahead of print). |
| Synytska et al., “Wetting on Fractal Superhydrophobic Surfaces from ‘Core-Shell’ Particles: a Comparison of Theory and Experiment,” Langmuir, abstract only (Feb. 10, 2009; epublication ahead of print). |
| Torró-Palau et al., “Characterization of polyurethanes containing different silicas,” International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 21(1):1-9, abstract only (2001). |
| Two webpages re pigment particle size: http://www.specialchem4coatings.com/tc/color-handbook/index.aspx?id=size and http://www.specialchem4coatings.com/tc/tio2/index.aspx?id=whiteness, SpecialChem, S.A. (printed Jul. 19, 2013). |
| Venkateswara et al., “Preparation of MTMS based transparent superhydrophobic silica films by sol-gel method,” J Colloid Interface Sci, 332(2):484-490, abstract only (Apr. 15, 2009; epublished Jan. 14, 2009). |
| Wang et al., “One-step coating of fluoro-containing silica nanoparticles for universal generation of surface superhydrophobicity,” Chem Commun (Camb),7:877-879, abstract only (Feb. 21, 2008; epublished Dec. 18, 2007). |
| Yang et al., “Influence of surface roughness on superhydrophobicity,” Phys Rev Lett, 97(11):116103, abstract only (Sep. 15, 2006; epublished Septenber 14, 2006). |
| Zhang et al., “Application of superhydrophobic edge effects in solving the liquid outflow phenomena,” Langmuir, 23(6):3230-3235, abstract only (Mar. 13, 2007; epublished Jan. 25, 2007). |
| Zhou et al., “Study on the morphology and tribological properties of acrylic based polyurethane/fumed silica composite coatings,” Journal of Materials Science, 39:1593-1594, abstract only (2004). |
| Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 13/082,327, “Highly Durable Superhydrophobic, Oleophobic and Anti-Icing Coatings and Methods and Compositions for Their Preparation,” filed Apr. 7, 2011. |
| Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/320,358, “Highly Durable Superhydrophobic, Oleophobic and Anti-Icing Coatings and Methods and Compositions for Their Preparation,” filed Jun. 30, 2014. |
| Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/323,660, “Elastomeric Coatings Having Hydrophobic and/or Oleophobic Properties,” filed Jul. 3, 2014. |
| “Surfactant,” found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surrfactant, Wikipedia (viewed Dec. 28, 2015). |
| “Taber® Test Method Reference,” found at http://www.taberindustries.com/documents/Taber Test Reference by Method.pdf (Jun. 2014, viewed Oct. 6, 2015) (2 pages). |
| Courbin et al., “Your wetting day,” Physics Today, 60(2):84 (Feb. 2007). |
| Extended European search report for European Application No. 12749985.3, dated Apr. 7, 2015. |
| Extended European search report for European Application No. 12857248.4, dated Apr. 7, 2015. |
| Kim et al., “A simple fabrication route to a highly transparent super-hydrophobic surface with a poly(dimethylsiloxane) coated flexible mold,” Chem Commun(Camb), 22:2237-2239, abstract only (Jun. 14, 2007; epublished Mar. 6, 2007). |
| Kobayashi et al., Surface Tension of Poly[(3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6,6-nonafluorohexyl)-methylsiloxane], Macromolecules, 23:4929-4933 (1990). |
| Kovalchuk et al., “Fluoro- vs hydrocarbon surfactants: Why do they differ in wetting performance?,” Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 210:65-71 (available online Apr. 13, 2014). |
| Kraton® FG1901 G Polymer, Data Document, Identifier K127DDh14U, the Kraton Polymers Group of Companies (Jun. 17, 2014). |
| Mohammadi et al., “Effect of Surfactants on Wetting of Super-Hydrophobic Surfaces,” Langmuir, 20:9657-9662 (available online Oct. 2, 2004). |
| Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 13/082,319, filed Apr. 7, 2011, as downloaded on Jan. 5, 2016. |
| Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 13/618,779, filed Sep. 14, 2012, as downloaded on Jan. 5, 2016. |
| Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 13/972,034, filed Aug. 21, 2013, as downloaded on Jan. 5, 2016. |
| Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/305,425, filed Jun. 16, 2014, as downloaded on Jan. 5, 2016. |
| Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/320,315, filed Jun. 30, 2014, as downloaded on Jan. 5, 2016. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/028541 (published as WO Publication No. 2011/116005), dated May 17, 2011. |
| Prosecution History of U.S. Appl. No. 14/837,253, filed Aug. 27, 2015. |
| Extended European search report for European Application No. 13809987.4, dated Feb. 22, 2016. |
| Shang, et al. Facile fabrication of superhydrophobic surface via SiO2/fluro-containing polymer composite particles, CAPlus Accession No. 2013:1045604, 2 pages (Jul. 5, 2013). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140205804 A1 | Jul 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61663985 | Jun 2012 | US | |
| 61708760 | Oct 2012 | US | |
| 61768290 | Feb 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/US2013/031751 | Mar 2013 | US |
| Child | 14229047 | US |
