Elastomeric composition

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7425591
  • Patent Number
    7,425,591
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, October 16, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 16, 2008
    16 years ago
Abstract
The present invention is a composition including an isobutylene-based copolymer and polybutene. The copolymers may be mixed with an exfoliating compound and clay, the entire composition forming a nanocomposite. The clay may or may not have an additional exfoliating treatment present prior to mixing with the interpolymer. The composition of the invention has improved air barrier properties and processing properties, and is suitable as an air barrier. One embodiment of the invention is an elastomeric composition including at least one random copolymer of at least a C4 to C7 isomonoolefin derived unit, at least one filler, and polybutene oil having a number average molecular weight greater than 400. The copolymer may be selected from a halogenated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene), a halogenated star-branched butyl rubber, or a halogenated butyl rubber, and mixtures thereof.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 09/691,764, filed Oct. 18, 2000 and the benefit of Provisional Application No. 60/294,808, filed May 31, 2001 herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed towards a low-permeability elastomeric composition which may include a nanoclay, and more particularly to a composition of an isobutylene-based copolymer with a filler such as carbon black and clay with polybutene processing oil to form an air barrier such as a tire innerliner.


BACKGROUND

Bromobutyl and chlorobutyl rubbers are the polymers of choice for air-retention in tubeless tires. Similarly, brominated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene) (BIMS), such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,162,445 and 5,698,640, is typically used when heat resistance or another important property is of importance. The selection of ingredients for the commercial formulations of elastomers depends upon the balance of properties desired and the application and end use. For example, in the tire industry, processing properties of the green (uncured) compound in the tire plant versus in-service performance of the cured rubber tire composite, and the nature of the tire, i.e. bias versus radial tire, and passenger versus truck versus aircraft tire are all important considerations that must be balanced.


One method to alter product properties and improve air barrier properties is to add clays to elastomers to form a “nanocomposite”. Nanocomposites are polymer systems containing inorganic particles with at least one dimension in the nanometer range. Some examples of these are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,060,549, 6,103,817, 6,034,164, 5,973,053, 5,936,023, 5,883,173, 5,807,629, 5,665,183, 5,576,373, and 5,576,372. A common type of inorganic particle used in nanocomposites are phyllosilicates, an inorganic substance from the general class of so called “nano-clays” or “clays”. Ideally, intercalation should take place in the nanocomposite, wherein the polymer inserts into the space or gallery between the clay surfaces. Ultimately, it is desirable to have near complete exfoliation, wherein the polymer is fully dispersed with the individual nanometer-size clay platelets. Due to the general enhancement in air barrier qualities of various polymer compositions when clays are present, there is a desire to have a nanocomposite with low air permeability.


Nanocomposites have been formed using brominated copolymers of isobutylene and p-methylstyrene. See, for example, Elspass et. al., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,807,629, 5,883,173, and 6,034,164. Further improvement in the uncured and cured properties of these elastomeric compositions can be achieved by the use of processing aids. Resins and oils (or “processing aids”) such as naphthenic, paraffinic, and aliphatic resins may be used to improve the processability of elastomeric compounds. However, increased processability in the presence of oils and resins comes at the price of a loss of air impermeability and an increase in undesirable color, among other undesirable effects of various other properties.


Polybutene and paraffinic-type processing oils have been disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,279,284 to Spadone, U.S. Pat. No. 5,964,969 to Sandstrom et al. and EP 0 314 416 to Mohammed. A paraffinic-type processing oil is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,631,316 to Costemalle et al. Also, WO 94/01295 to Gursky et al. discloses the use of petroleum waxes and naphthenic oils and resins in a rubber composition for tire sidewalls, and U.S. Ser. No. 09/691,764, filed Oct. 18, 2000 (assigned to the assignee of the present invention) to Waddell et al. discloses colorable rubber compositions. Other disclosures of processing oil or resin-containing elastomeric or adhesive compositions include U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,005,625, 5,013,793, 5,162,409, 5,178,702, 5,234,987, 5,234,987, 5,242,727, 5,397,832, 5,733,621, 5,755,899, EP 0 682 071 A1, EP 0376 558B1, WO 92/16587, and JP11005874, JP05179068A and J03028244. None of these disclosures solves the problem of improving processability of elastomeric compositions useful for tires, air barriers, etc, while maintaining or improving the air impermeability of those compositions.


Thus, there is still a problem of achieving a nanocomposite suitable for an air barrier, in particular, an air barrier incorporating the copolymer (or “terpolymer”) of a C4 to C7 isomonoolefin and a p-methylstyrene and a p-halomethylstyrene, and/or a halogenated branched-butyl rubber. While enhancing the barrier properties of elastomeric compositions, nanocomposite formation tends to be at the expense of processability.


Also, it remains problematic to incorporate natural rubber into blends with these copolymers, as some desirable properties are lost upon addition of the natural rubber. What is needed is an elastomeric composition and nanocomposite composition that maintains desirable air barrier qualities, but has improved processability that processing oils and resins may provide, even in the presence of natural rubber blends.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention include an elastomeric composition comprising at least one random copolymer comprising a C4 to C7 isomonoolefin derived unit, at least one filler, and polybutene oil having a number average molecular weight greater than 400, and a viscosity of greater than 35 cSt at 100° C. The copolymer is selected from poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene), halogenated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene), halogenated star-branched butyl rubber, halogenated butyl rubber, and mixtures thereof. The composition may also include a thermoplastic resin, a filler, and/or an exfoliating clay. Suitable thermoplastic resins include polyolefins, nylons, and other polymers. The filler is selected from calcium carbonate, clay, mica, silica and silicates, talc, titanium dioxide, starch and other organic fillers such as wood flower, and carbon black, and mixtures thereof. The exfoliated clay is selected from exfoliated natural or synthetic montmorillonite, nontronite, beidellite, volkonskoite, laponite, hectorite, saponite, sauconite, magadite, kenyaite, stevensite, vermiculite, halloysite, aluminate oxides, hydrotalcite, and mixtures thereof. These compositions are useful in air barrier applications such as, for example, innerliners for a tires.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The term “phr” is parts per hundred rubber, and is a measure common in the art wherein components of a composition are measured relative to a major elastomer component, based upon 100 parts by weight of the elastomer or elastomers.


As used herein, in reference to Periodic Table “Groups”, the new numbering scheme for the Periodic Table Groups are used as in HAWLEY'S CONDENSED CHEMICAL DICTIONARY 852 (13th ed. 1997).


The term “elastomer”, as used herein, refers to any polymer or composition of polymers consistent with the ASTM D1566 definition. The term “elastomer” may be used interchangeably with the term “rubber”, as used herein.


Elastomer


Compositions of the present invention include at least one elastomer. The elastomer in one embodiment of the invention is an isobutylene-based homopolymer or copolymer. These polymers can be described as random copolymer of a C4 to C7 isomonoolefin derived unit, such as isobutylene derived unit, and at least one other polymerizable unit. The isobutylene-based copolymer may or may not be halogenated.


In one embodiment of the invention, the isobutylene-based elastomer is a butyl-type rubber or branched butyl-type rubber, especially halogenated versions of these elastomers. Useful elastomers are unsaturated butyl rubbers such as homopolymers and copolymers of olefins or isoolefins and multiolefins, or homopolymers of multiolefins. These and other types of elastomers suitable for the invention are well known and are described in RUBBER TECHNOLOGY 209-581 (Maurice Morton ed., Chapman & Hall 1995), THE VANDERBILT RUBBER HANDBOOK 105-122 (Robert F. Ohm ed., R. T. Vanderbilt Co., Inc. 1990), and Edward Kresge and H. C. Wang in 8 KIRK -OTHMER ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY 934-955 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 4th ed. 1993). Non-limiting examples of unsaturated elastomers useful in the method and composition of the present invention are poly(isobutylene-co-isoprene), polyisoprene, polybutadiene, polyisobutylene, poly(styrene-co-butadiene), natural rubber, star-branched butyl rubber, and mixtures thereof. Useful elastomers in the present invention can be made by any suitable means known in the art, and the invention is not herein limited by the method of producing the elastomer.


Butyl rubbers are prepared by reacting a mixture of monomers, the mixture having at least (1) a C4 to C12 isoolefin monomer component such as isobutylene with (2) a multiolefin, monomer component. The isoolefin is in a range from 70 to 99.5 wt % by weight of the total monomer mixture in one embodiment, and 85 to 99.5 wt % in another embodiment. The multiolefin component is present in the monomer mixture from 30 to 0.5 wt % in one embodiment, and from 15 to 0.5 wt % in another embodiment. In yet another embodiment, from 8 to 0.5 wt % of the monomer mixture is multiolefin.


The isoolefin is a C4 to C12 compound, non-limiting examples of which are compounds such as isobutylene, isobutene, 2-methyl-1-butene, 3-methyl-1-butene, 2-methyl-2-butene, 1-butene, 2-butene, methyl vinyl ether, indene, vinyltrimethylsilane, hexene, and 4-methyl-1-pentene. The multiolefin is a C4 to C14 multiolefin such as isoprene, butadiene, 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene, myrcene, 6,6-dimethyl-fulvene, hexadiene, cyclopentadiene, and piperylene, and other monomers such as disclosed in EP 0 279 456 and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,506,316 and 5,162,425. Other polymerizable monomers such as styrene and dichlorostyrene are also suitable for homopolymerization or copolymerization in butyl rubbers. One embodiment of the butyl rubber polymer of the invention is obtained by reacting 95 to 99.5 wt % of isobutylene with 0.5 to 8 wt % isoprene, or from 0.5 wt % to 5.0 wt % isoprene in yet another embodiment. Butyl rubbers and methods of their production are described in detail in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,356,128, 3,968,076, 4,474,924, 4,068,051 and 5,532,312.


A commercial example of a desirable butyl rubber is EXXON™ BUTYL Grades of poly(isobutylene-co-isoprene), having a Mooney viscosity of from 32±2 to 51±5 (ML 1+8 at 125° C.). Another commercial example of a desirable butyl-type rubber is VISTANEX™ polyisobutylene rubber having a molecular weight viscosity average of from 0.9±0.15 to 2.11±0.23×106.


Another embodiment of the butyl rubber useful in the invention is a branched or “star-branched” butyl rubber. These rubbers are described in, for example, EP 0 678 529 B1, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,182,333 and 5,071,913. In one embodiment, the star-branched butyl rubber (“SBB”) is a composition of a butyl rubber, either halogenated or not, and a polydiene or block copolymer, either halogenated or not. The invention is not limited by the method of forming the SBB. The polydienes/block copolymer, or branching agents (hereinafter “polydienes”), are typically cationically reactive and are present during the polymerization of the butyl or halogenated butyl rubber, or can be blended with the butyl rubber to form the SBB. The branching agent or polydiene can be any suitable branching agent, and the invention is not limited to the type of polydiene used to make the SBB.


In one embodiment, the SBB is typically a composition of the butyl or halogenated butyl rubber as described above and a copolymer of a polydiene and a partially hydrogenated polydiene selected from the group including styrene, polybutadiene, polyisoprene, polypiperylene, natural rubber, styrene-butadiene rubber, ethylene-propylene diene rubber (EPDM), ethylene-propylene rubber (EPM), styrene-butadiene-styrene and styrene-isoprene-styrene block copolymers. These polydienes are present, based on the monomer wt %, greater than 0.3 wt % in one embodiment, and from 0.3 to 3 wt % in another embodiment, and from 0.4 to 2.7 wt % in yet another embodiment.


A commercial embodiment of the SBB of the present invention is SB Butyl 4266 (ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Houston Tex.), having a Mooney viscosity (ML 1+8 at 125° C., ASTM D 1646) of from 34 to 44. Further, cure characteristics of SB Butyl 4266 are as follows: MH is 69±6 dN·m, ML is 11.5±4.5 dN·m (ASTM D2084).


The isobutylene-based rubber may also be halogenated in a desirable embodiment of the isobutylene-based copolymer useful in the invention. Halogenated butyl rubber is produced by the halogenation of the butyl rubber product described above. Halogenation can be carried out by any means, and the invention is not herein limited by the halogenation process. Methods of halogenating polymers such as butyl polymers are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,631,984, 3,099,644, 4,554,326, 4,681,921, 4,650,831, 4,384,072, 4,513,116 and 5,681,901. In one embodiment, the butyl rubber is halogenated in hexane diluent at from 4 to 60° C. using bromine (Br2) or chlorine (Cl2) as the halogenation agent. The halogenated butyl rubber has a Mooney Viscosity of from 20 to 70 (ML 1+8 at 125° C.) in one embodiment, and from 25 to 55 in another embodiment. The halogen wt % is from 0.1 to 10 wt % based in on the weight of the halogenated butyl rubber in one embodiment, and from 0.5 to 5 wt % in another embodiment. In yet another embodiment, the halogen wt % of the halogenated butyl rubber is from 1 to 2.5 wt %.


A commercial embodiment of the halogenated butyl rubber of the present invention is Bromobutyl 2222 (ExxonMobil Chemical Company). Its Mooney Viscosity is from 27 to 37 (ML 1+8 at 125° C., ASTM 1646, modified), and the bromine content is from 1.8 to 2.2 wt % relative to the Bromobutyl 2222. Further, cure characteristics of Bromobutyl 2222 are as follows: MH is from 28 to 40 dN·m, ML is from 7 to 18 dN·m (ASTM D2084). Another commercial embodiment of the halogenated butyl rubber is Bromobutyl 2255 (ExxonMobil Chemical Company). Its Mooney Viscosity is from 41 to 51 (ML 1+8 at 125° C., ASTM D1646), and the bromine content is from 1.8 to 2.2 wt %. Further, cure characteristics of Bromobutyl 2255 are as follows: MH is from 34 to 48 dN·m, ML is from 11 to 21 dN·m (ASTM D2084).


In another embodiment of the brominated rubber component of the invention, a branched or “star-branched” halogenated butyl rubber is used. In one embodiment, the halogenated star-branched butyl rubber (“HSSB”) is a composition of a butyl rubber, either halogenated or not, and a polydiene or block copolymer, either halogenated or not. The halogenation process is described in detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,074,035, 5,071,913, 5,286,804, 5,182,333 and 6,228,978. The invention is not limited by the method of forming the HSSB. The polydienes/block copolymer, or branching agents (hereinafter “polydienes”), are typically cationically reactive and are present during the polymerization of the butyl or halogenated butyl rubber, or can be blended with the butyl or halogenated butyl rubber to form the HSSB. The branching agent or polydiene can be any suitable branching agent, and the invention is not limited to the type of polydiene used to make the HSSB.


In one embodiment, the HSSB is typically a composition of the butyl or halogenated butyl rubber as described above and a copolymer of a polydiene and a partially hydrogenated polydiene selected from the group including styrene, polybutadiene, polyisoprene, polypiperylene, natural rubber, styrene-butadiene rubber, ethylene-propylene diene rubber, styrene-butadiene-styrene and styrene-isoprene-styrene block copolymers. These polydienes are present, based on the monomer wt %, greater than 0.3 wt % in one embodiment, and from 0.3 to 3 wt % in another embodiment, and from 0.4 to 2.7 wt % in yet another embodiment.


A commercial embodiment of the HSSB of the present invention is Bromobutyl 6222 (ExxonMobil Chemical Company), having a Mooney Viscosity (ML 1+8 at 125° C., ASTM D1646) of from 27 to 37, and a bromine content of from 2.2 to 2.6 wt % relative to the HSSB. Further, cure characteristics of Bromobutyl 6222 are as follows: MH is from 24 to 38 dN·m, ML is from 6 to 16 dN·m (ASTM D2084).


Another embodiment of the isobutylene-based elastomer useful in the invention is an isoolefin copolymer comprising a halomethylstyrene derived unit. The elastomer in one embodiment of the invention is a random copolymer of comprising at least C4 to C7 isoolefin derived units, such as isobutylene derived units, and halomethylstyrene derived units. The halomethylstyrene unit may be an ortho-, meta-, or para-alkyl-substituted styrene unit. In one embodiment, the halomethylstyrene derived unit is a p-halomethylstyrene containing at least 80%, more preferably at least 90% by weight of the para-isomer. The “halo” group can be any halogen, desirably chlorine or bromine. The halogenated elastomer may also include functionalized interpolymers wherein at least some of the alkyl substituents groups present in the styrene monomer units contain benzylic halogen or some other functional group described further below. These interpolymers are herein referred to as “isoolefin copolymers comprising a halomethylstyrene derived unit” or simply “isoolefin copolymer”.


The isoolefin copolymer may also include other monomer derived units. The isoolefin of the copolymer may be a C4 to C12 compound, non-limiting examples of which are compounds such as isobutylene, isobutene, 2-methyl-1-butene, 3-methyl-1-butene, 2-methyl-2-butene, 1-butene, 2-butene, methyl vinyl ether, indene, vinyltrimethylsilane, hexene, and 4-methyl-1-pentene. The copolymer may also further comprise multiolefin derived units. The multiolefin is a C4 to C14 multiolefin such as isoprene, butadiene, 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene, myrcene, 6,6-dimethyl-fulvene, hexadiene, cyclopentadiene, and piperylene, and other monomers such as disclosed in EP 0 279 456 and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,506,316 and 5,162,425. Desirable styrenic monomer derived units that may comprise the copolymer include styrene, methylstyrene, chlorostyrene, methoxystyrene, indene and indene derivatives, and combinations thereof.


In another embodiment of the invention, the interpolymer is a random elastomeric copolymer of an ethylene derived unit or a C3 to C6 α-olefin derived unit and an halomethylstyrene derived unit, preferably p-halomethylstyrene containing at least 80%, more preferably at least 90% by weight of the para-isomer and also include functionalized interpolymers wherein at least some of the alkyl substituents groups present in the styrene monomer units contain benzylic halogen or some other functional group.


Preferred isoolefin copolymers may be characterized as interpolymers containing the following monomer units randomly spaced along the polymer chain:




embedded image



wherein R and R1 are independently hydrogen, lower alkyl, preferably C1 to C7 alkyl and primary or secondary alkyl halides and X is a functional group such as halogen. Desirable halogens are chlorine, bromine or combinations thereof. Preferably R and R1 are each hydrogen. The —CRR1H and —CRR1X groups can be substituted on the styrene ring in either the ortho, meta, or para positions, preferably para. Up to 60 mole % of the p-substituted styrene present in the interpolymer structure may be the functionalized structure (2) above in one embodiment, and in another embodiment from 0.1 to 5 mol %. In yet another embodiment, the amount of functionalized structure (2) is from 0.4 to 1 mol %.


The functional group X may be halogen or some other functional group which may be incorporated by nucleophilic substitution of benzylic halogen with other groups such as carboxylic acids; carboxy salts; carboxy esters, amides and imides; hydroxy; alkoxide; phenoxide; thiolate; thioether; xanthate; cyanide; cyanate; amino and mixtures thereof. These functionalized isomonoolefin copolymers, their method of preparation, methods of functionalization, and cure are more particularly disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,162,445.


Most useful of such functionalized materials are elastomeric random interpolymers of isobutylene and p-methylstyrene containing from 0.5 to 20 mole % p-methylstyrene wherein up to 60 mole % of the methyl substituent groups present on the benzyl ring contain a bromine or chlorine atom, preferably a bromine atom (p-bromomethylstyrene), as well as acid or ester functionalized versions thereof wherein the halogen atom has been displaced by maleic anhydride or by acrylic or methacrylic acid functionality. These interpolymers are termed “halogenated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene)” or “brominated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene)”, and are commercially available under the name EXXPRO™ Elastomers (ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Houston Tex.). It is understood that the use of the terms “halogenated” or “brominated” are not limited to the method of halogenation of the copolymer, but merely descriptive of the copolymer which comprises the isobutylene derived units, the p-methylstyrene derived units, and the p-halomethylstyrene derived units.


These functionalized polymers preferably have a substantially homogeneous compositional distribution such that at least 95% by weight of the polymer has a p-alkylstyrene content within 10% of the average p-alkylstyrene content of the polymer. More preferred polymers are also characterized by a narrow molecular weight distribution (Mw/Mn) of less than 5, more preferably less than 2.5, a preferred viscosity average molecular weight in the range of from 200,000 up to 2,000,000 and a preferred number average molecular weight in the range of from 25,000 to 750,000 as determined by gel permeation chromatography.


The copolymers may be prepared by a slurry polymerization of the monomer mixture using a Lewis acid catalyst, followed by halogenation, preferably bromination, in solution in the presence of halogen and a radical initiator such as heat and/or light and/or a chemical initiator and, optionally, followed by electrophilic substitution of bromine with a different functional derived unit.


Preferred halogenated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene) are brominated polymers which generally contain from 0.1 to 5 wt % of bromomethyl groups. In yet another embodiment, the amount of bromomethyl groups is from 0.2 to 2.5 wt %. Expressed another way, preferred copolymers contain from 0.05 up to 2.5 mole % of bromine, based on the weight of the polymer, more preferably from 0.1 to 1.25 mole % bromine, and are substantially free of ring halogen or halogen in the polymer backbone chain. In one embodiment of the invention, the interpolymer is a copolymer of C4 to C, isomonoolefin derived units, a p-methylstyrene derived units and a p-halomethylstyrene derived units, wherein the p-halomethylstyrene units are present in the interpolymer from 0.4 to 1 mol % based on the interpolymer. In another embodiment, the p-halomethylstyrene is p-bromomethylstyrene. The Mooney Viscosity (1+8, 125° C., ASTM D1646, modified) is from 30 to 60 MU.


The elastomeric component present in compositions of the invention may contain various amounts of one, two, or more different elastomers. For example, embodiments of compositions of the invention may contain from 5 to 100 phr of halogenated butyl rubber, from 5 to 95 phr of star-branched butyl rubber, from 5 to 95 phr of halogenated star-branched butyl rubber, or from 5 to 95 phr of halogenated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene). In another embodiment, the compositions contain from 40 to 100 phr of halogenated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene), and/or from 40 to 100 phr of halogenated star-branched butyl rubber (HSSB). The elastomeric compositions of the invention may contain other elastomers, or so called “secondary” elastomer components.


Secondary Elastomeric Component


A secondary elastomeric component may be present in compositions of the present invention. These rubbers include, but are not limited to, natural rubbers, polyisoprene rubber, styrene butadiene rubber (SBR), polybutadiene rubber, isoprene butadiene rubber (IBR), styrene-isoprene-butadiene rubber (SIBR), ethylene-propylene rubber, ethylene-propylene-diene rubber (EPDM), polysulfide, nitrile rubber, propylene oxide polymers, star-branched butyl rubber and halogenated star-branched butyl rubber, brominated butyl rubber, chlorinated butyl rubber, star-branched polyisobutylene rubber, star-branched brominated butyl (polyisobutylene/isoprene copolymer) rubber; isobutylene/methylstyrene copolymers such as isobutylene/meta-bromomethylstyrene, isobutylene/bromomethylstyrene, isobutylene/chloromethylstyrene, halogenated isobutylene cyclopentadiene, and isobutylene/chloromethylstyrene and mixtures thereof.


A secondary rubber component may also be present in the composition and air barrier of the invention. An embodiment of the secondary rubber component present is natural rubber. Natural rubbers are described in detail by Subramaniam in RUBBER TECHNOLOGY 179-208 (1995). Desirable embodiments of the natural rubbers of the present invention are selected from the group consisting of Malaysian rubber such as SMR CV, SMR 5, SMR 10, SMR 20, and SMR 50 and mixtures thereof, wherein the natural rubbers have a Mooney viscosity at 100° C. (ML 1+4) of from 30 to 120, more preferably from 40 to 65. The Mooney viscosity test referred to herein is in accordance with ASTM D-1646.


Some commercial examples of synthetic secondary rubbers useful in the present invention are NATSYN™ (Goodyear Chemical Company), and BUDENE™ 1207 or BR 1207 (Goodyear Chemical Company). A desirable rubber is high cis-polybutadiene (cis-BR). By “cis-polybutadiene” or “high cis-polybutadiene”, it is meant that 1,4-cis polybutadiene is used, wherein the amount of cis component is at least 95%. An example of high cis-polybutadiene commercial products used in the composition BUDENE™ 1207. A suitable ethylene-propylene rubber is commercially available as VISTALON™ (ExxonMobil Chemical Company).


In one embodiment of the invention, a so called semi-crystalline copolymer (SCC) is present as the secondary rubber. Semi-crystalline copolymers are described in U.S. Ser. No. 09/569,363, filed on May 11, 2000 (assigned to the assignee of the present invention). Generally, the SCC is a copolymer of ethylene or propylene derived units and a-olefin derived units, the a-olefin having from 4 to 16 carbon atoms in one embodiment, and in another embodiment the SCC is a copolymer of ethylene derived units and a-olefin derived units, the α-olefin having from 4 to 10 carbon atoms, wherein the SCC has some degree of crystallinity. In a further embodiment, the SCC is a copolymer of 1-butene derived units and another α-olefin derived unit, the other α-olefin having from 5 to 16 carbon atoms, wherein the SCC also has some degree of crystallinity. The SCC can also be a copolymer of ethylene and styrene.


The secondary rubber component of the elastomer composition may be present in a range from up to 50 phr in one embodiment, from up to 40 phr in another embodiment, and from up to 30 phr in yet another embodiment.


Thermoplastic Resin


The compositions of the invention may optionally include a thermoplastic resin. Thermoplastic resins suitable for practice of the present invention may be used singly or in combination and are resins containing nitrogen, oxygen, halogen, sulfur or other groups capable of interacting with an aromatic functional groups such as halogen or acidic groups. The resins are present in the nanocomposite from 30 to 90 wt % of the nanocomposite in one embodiment, and from 40 to 80 wt % in another embodiment, and from 50 to 70 wt % in yet another embodiment. In yet another embodiment, the resin is present at a level of greater than 40 wt % of the nanocomposite, and greater than 60 wt % in another embodiment.


Suitable thermoplastic resins include resins selected from the group consisting or polyamides, polyimides, polycarbonates, polyesters, polysulfones, polylactones, polyacetals, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene resins (ABS), polyphenyleneoxide (PPO), polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), polystyrene, styrene-acrylonitrile resins (SAN), styrene maleic anhydride resins (SMA), aromatic polyketones (PEEK, PED, and PEKK) and mixtures thereof.


Suitable thermoplastic polyamides (nylons) comprise crystalline or resinous, high molecular weight solid polymers including copolymers and terpolymers having recurring amide units within the polymer chain. Polyamides may be prepared by polymerization of one or more epsilon lactams such as caprolactam, pyrrolidione, lauryllactam and aminoundecanoic lactam, or amino acid, or by condensation of dibasic acids and diamines. Both fiber-forming and molding grade nylons are suitable. Examples of such polyamides are polycaprolactam (nylon-6), polylauryllactam (nylon-12), polyhexamethyleneadipamide (nylon-6,6) polyhexamethyleneazelamide (nylon-6,9), polyhexamethylenesebacamide (nylon-6,10), polyhexamethyleneisophthalamide (nylon-6, IP) and the condensation product of 11-amino-undecanoic acid (nylon-11). Additional examples of satisfactory polyamides (especially those having a softening point below 275° C.) are described in 16 ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY 1-105 (John Wiley & Sons 1968), CONCISE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF POLYMER SCIENCE AND 748-761 (John Wiley & Sons, 1990), and 10 ENCYCLOPEDIA OF POLYMER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 392-414 (John Wiley & Sons 1969). Commercially available thermoplastic polyamides may be advantageously used in the practice of this invention, with linear crystalline polyamides having a softening point or melting point between 160 and 260° C. being preferred.


Suitable thermoplastic polyesters which may be employed include the polymer reaction products of one or a mixture of aliphatic or aromatic polycarboxylic acids esters of anhydrides and one or a mixture of diols. Examples of satisfactory polyesters include poly (trans-1,4-cyclohexylene C2-6 alkane dicarboxylates such as poly(trans-1,4-cyclohexylene succinate) and poly (trans-1,4-cyclohexylene adipate); poly (cis or trans-1,4-cyclohexanedimethylene) alkanedicarboxylates such as poly(cis-1,4-cyclohexanedimethylene) oxlate and poly-(cis-1,4-cyclohexanedimethylene) succinate, poly (C2-4 alkylene terephthalates) such as polyethyleneterephthalate and polytetramethylene-terephthalate, poly (C2-4 alkylene isophthalates such as polyethyleneisophthalate and polytetramethylene-isophthalate and like materials. Preferred polyesters are derived from aromatic dicarboxylic acids such as naphthalenic or phthalic acids and C2 to C4 diols, such as polyethylene terephthalate and polybutylene terephthalate. Preferred polyesters will have a melting point in the range of 160° C. to 260° C.


Poly(phenylene ether) (PPE) thermoplastic resins which may be used in accordance with this invention are well known, commercially available materials produced by the oxidative coupling polymerization of alkyl substituted phenols. They are generally linear, amorphous polymers having a glass transition temperature in the range of 190° C. to 235° C. These polymers, their method of preparation and compositions with polystyrene are further described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,383,435.


Other thermoplastic resins which may be used include the polycarbonate analogs of the polyesters described above such as segmented poly (ether co-phthalates); polycaprolactone polymers; styrene resins such as copolymers of styrene with less than 50 mol % of acrylonitrile (SAN) and resinous copolymers of styrene, acrylonitrile and butadiene (ABS); sulfone polymers such as polyphenyl sulfone; copolymers and homopolymers of ethylene and C2 to C8 α-olefins, in one embodiment a homopolymer of propylene derived units, and in another embodiment a random copolymer or block copolymer of ethylene derived units and propylene derived units, and like thermoplastic resins as are known in the art.


Polybutene Processing Oil


Polybutene processing oil is present in the composition of the invention. In one embodiment of the invention, the polybutene processing oil is a low molecular weight (less than 15,000 Mn) homopolymer or copolymer of olefin derived units having from 3 to 8 carbon atoms in one embodiment, preferably from 4 to 6 carbon atoms in another embodiment. In yet another embodiment, the polybutene is a homopolymer or copolymer of a C4 raffinate. An embodiment of such low molecular weight polymers termed “polybutene” polymers is described in, for example, SYNTHETIC LUBRICANTS AND HIGH-PERFORMANCE FUNCTIONAL FLUIDS 357-392 (Leslie R. Rudnick & Ronald L. Shubkin, ed., Marcel Dekker 1999) (hereinafter “polybutene processing oil” or “polybutene”).


In one embodiment of the invention, the polybutene processing oil is a copolymer of at least isobutylene derived units, 1-butene derived units, and 2-butene derived units. In one embodiment, the polybutene is a homopolymer, copolymer, or terpolymer of the three units, wherein the isobutylene derived units are from 40 to 100 wt % of the copolymer, the 1-butene derived units are from 0 to 40 wt % of the copolymer, and the 2-butene derived units are from 0 to 40 wt % of the copolymer. In another embodiment, the polybutene is a copolymer or terpolymer of the three units, wherein the isobutylene derived units are from 40 to 99 wt % of the copolymer, the 1-butene derived units are from 2 to 40 wt % of the copolymer, and the 2-butene derived units are from 0 to 30 wt % of the copolymer. In yet another embodiment, the polybutene is a terpolymer of the three units, wherein the isobutylene derived units are from 40 to 96 wt % of the copolymer, the 1-butene derived units are from 2 to 40 wt % of the copolymer, and the 2-butene derived units are from 2 to 20 wt % of the copolymer. In yet another embodiment, the polybutene is a homopolymer or copolymer of isobutylene and 1-butene, wherein the isobutylene derived units are from 65 to 100 wt % of the homopolymer or copolymer, and the 1-butene derived units are from. 0 to 35 wt % of the copolymer.


Polybutene processing oils useful in the invention typically have a number average molecular weight (Mn) of less than 10,000 in one embodiment, less than 8000 in another embodiment, and less than 6000 in yet another embodiment. In one embodiment, the polybutene oil has a number average molecular weight of greater than 400, and greater than 700 in another embodiment, and greater than 900 in yet another embodiment. A preferred embodiment can be a combination of any lower limit with any upper limit herein. For example, in one embodiment of the polybutene of the invention, the polybutene has a number average molecular weight of from 400 to 10,000, and from 700 to 8000 in another embodiment. Useful viscosities of the polybutene processing oil ranges from 10 to 6000 cSt (centiStokes) at 100° C. in one embodiment, and from 35 to 5000 cSt at 100° C. in another embodiment, and is greater than 35 cSt at 100° C. in yet another embodiment, and greater than 100 cSt at 100° C. in yet another embodiment.


Commercial examples of such a processing oil are the PARAPOL™ Series of processing oils (ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Houston Tex.), such as PARAPOL™ 450, 700, 950, 1300, 2400 and 2500. The commercially available PARAPOL™ Series of polybutene processing oils are synthetic liquid polybutenes, each individual formulation having a certain molecular weight, all formulations of which can be used in the composition of the invention. The molecular weights of the PARAPOL™ oils are from 420 Mn (PARAPOL™ 450) to 2700 Mn (PARAPOL™ 2500) as determined by gel permeation chromatography. The MWD of the PARAPOL™ oils range from 1.8 to 3 in one embodiment, and from 2 to 2.8 in another embodiment.


Below, Table 1 shows some of the properties of the PARAPOL™ oils useful in embodiments of the present invention, wherein the viscosity was determined as per ASTM D445-97, and the molecular weight by gel permeation chromatography.









TABLE 1







Properties of individual PARAPOL ™ Grades











Viscosity @


Grade
Mn
100° C., cSt












450
420
10.6


700
700
78


950
950
230


1300
1300
630


2400
2350
3200


2500
2700
4400









Other properties of PARAPOL™ processing oils are as follows: the density (g/mL) of PARAPOL™ processing oils varies from about 0.85 (PARAPOL™ 450) to 0.91 (PARAPOL™ 2500). The bromine number (CG/G) for PARAPOL™ oils ranges from 40 for the 450 Mn processing oil, to 8 for the 2700 Mn processing oil.


The elastomeric composition of the invention may include one or more types of polybutene as a mixture, blended either prior to addition to the elastomer, or with the elastomer. The amount and identity (e.g., viscosity, Mn, etc.) of the polybutene processing oil mixture can be varied in this manner. Thus, PARAPOL™ 450 can be used when low viscosity is desired in the composition of the invention, while PARAPOL™ 2500 can be used when a higher viscosity is desired, or compositions thereof to achieve some other viscosity or molecular weight. In this manner, the physical properties of the composition can be controlled. More particularly, the phrases “polybutene processing oil”, or “polybutene processing oil” include a single oil or a composition of two or more oils used to obtain any viscosity or molecular weight (or other property) desired, as specified in the ranges disclosed herein.


The polybutene processing oil or oils are present in the elastomeric composition of the invention from 1 to 60 phr in one embodiment, and from 2 to 40 phr in another embodiment, from 4 to 35 phr in another embodiment, and from 5 to 30 phr in yet another embodiment. Preferably, the polybutene processing oil does not contain aromatic groups or unsaturation.


Filler and Clay


The elastomeric composition may have one or more filler components such as calcium carbonate, clay, mica, silica and silicates, talc, titanium dioxide, starch and other organic fillers such as wood flower, and carbon black. In one embodiment, the filler is carbon black or modified carbon black. The preferred filler is semi-reinforcing grade carbon black present at a level of from 10 to 150 phr of the composition, more preferably from 30 to 120 phr. Useful grades of carbon black as described in RUBBER TECHNOLOGY 59-85 (1995) range from N110 to N990. More desirably, embodiments of the carbon black useful in, for example, tire treads are N229, N351, N339, N220, N234 and N110 provided in ASTM (D3037, D1510, and D3765). Embodiments of the carbon black useful in, for example, sidewalls in tires, are N330, N351, N550, N650, N660, and N762. Embodiments of the carbon black useful in, for example, innerliners or innertubes are N550, N650, N660, N762, N990, and Regal 85 (Cabot Corporation Alpharetta, Ga.) and the like.


Exfoliated clays may also be present in the composition. These clays, also referred to as “nanoclays”, are well known, and their identity, methods of preparation and blending with polymers is disclosed in, for example, JP 2000109635, 2000109605, 11310643; DE 19726278; WO98/53000; U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,091,462, 4,431,755, 4,472,538, and 5,910,523. Swellable layered clay materials suitable for the purposes of this invention include natural or synthetic phyllosilicates, particularly smectic clays such as montmorillonite, nontronite, beidellite, volkonskoite, laponite, hectorite, saponite, sauconite, magadite, kenyaite, stevensite and the like, as well as vermiculite, halloysite, aluminate oxides, hydrotalcite and the like. These layered clays generally comprise particles containing a plurality of silicate platelets having a thickness of from 4-20 Å in one embodiment, 8-12 Å in another embodiment, bound together and contain exchangeable cations such as Na+, Ca+2, K+ or Mg+2 present at the interlayer surfaces.


The layered clay may be intercalated and exfoliated by treatment with organic molecules (swelling agents) capable of undergoing ion exchange reactions with the cations present at the interlayer surfaces of the layered silicate. Suitable swelling agents include cationic surfactants such as ammonium, alkylamines or alkylammonium (primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary), phosphonium or sulfonium derivatives of aliphatic, aromatic or arylaliphatic amines, phosphines and sulfides. Desirable amine compounds (or the corresponding ammonium ion) are those with the structure R1R2R3N, wherein R1, R2, and R3 are C1 to C20 alkyls or alkenes which may be the same or different. In one embodiment, the exfoliating agent is a so called long chain tertiary amine, wherein at least R1 is a C14 to C20 alkyl or alkene.


Another class of swelling agents include those which can be covalently bonded to the interlayer surfaces. These include polysilanes of the structure —Si(R′)2R2 where R′ is the same or different at each occurrence and is selected from alkyl, alkoxy or oxysilane and R2 is an organic radical compatible with the matrix polymer of the composite.


Other suitable swelling agents include protonated amino acids and salts thereof containing 2-30 carbon atoms such as 12-aminododecanoic acid, epsilon-caprolactam and like materials. Suitable swelling agents and processes for intercalating layered silicates are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,472,538, 4,810,734, 4,889,885 as well as WO92/02582.


In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the exfoliating additive is combined with a halogenated polymer. In one embodiment, the additive includes all primary, secondary and tertiary amines and phosphines; alkyl and aryl sulfides and thiols; and their polyfunctional versions. Desirable additives include: long-chain tertiary amines such as N,N-dimethyl-octadecylamine, N,N-dioctadecyl-methylamine, so called dihydrogenated tallowalkyl-methylamine and the like, and amine-terminated polytetrahydrofuran; long-chain thiol and thiosulfate compounds like hexamethylene sodium thiosulfate. In another embodiment of the invention, improved interpolymer impermeability is achieved by the presence of polyfunctional curatives such as hexamethylene bis(sodium thiosulfate) and hexamethylene bis(cinnamaldehyde).


The amount of clay or exfoliated clay incorporated in the nanocomposites in accordance with this invention is sufficient to develop an improvement in the mechanical properties or barrier properties of the nanocomposite, e.g tensile strength or air/oxygen permeability. Amounts generally will range from 0.5 to 15 wt % in one embodiment, and from 1 to 10 wt % in another embodiment, and from I to 5 in yet another embodiment, based on the polymer content of the nanocomposite. Expressed in parts per hundred rubber, the clay or exfoliated clay may be present from 1 to 30 phr in one embodiment, and from 3 to 20 phr in another embodiment. In one embodiment, the exfoliated clay is an alkylamine-exfoliated clay.


Curing Agents and Accelerators


The compositions produced in accordance with the present invention typically contain other components and additives customarily used in rubber mixes, such as pigments, accelerators, cross-linking and curing materials, antioxidants, antiozonants, and fillers. In one embodiment, processing aids (resins) such as naphthenic, aromatic or paraffinic extender oils may be present from 1 to 30 phr. In another embodiment, naphthenic, aliphatic, paraffinic and other aromatic resins and oils are substantially absent from the composition. By “substantially absent”, it is meant that naphthenic, aliphatic, paraffinic and other aromatic resins are present, if at all, to an extent no greater than 2 phr in the composition.


Generally, polymer compositions, e.g., those used to produce tires, are crosslinked. It is known that the physical properties, performance characteristics, and durability of vulcanized rubber compounds are directly related to the number (crosslink density) and type of crosslinks formed during the vulcanization reaction. (See, e.g., Helt et al., The Post Vulcanization Stabilization for NR, RUBBER WORLD 18-23 (1991). Cross-linking and curing agents include sulfur, zinc oxide, and fatty acids. Peroxide cure systems may also be used. Generally, polymer compositions may be crosslinked by adding curative molecules, for example sulfur, metal oxides (i.e., zinc oxide), organometallic compounds, radical initiators, etc. followed by heating. In particular, the following are common curatives that will function in the present invention: ZnO, CaO, MgO, Al2O3, CrO3, FeO, Fe2O3, and NiO. These metal oxides can be used in conjunction with the corresponding metal stearate complex (e.g., Zn(Stearate)2, Ca(Stearate)2, Mg(Stearate)2, and Al(Stearate)3), or with stearic acid, and either a sulfur compound or an alkylperoxide compound. (See also, Formulation Design and Curing Characteristics of NBR Mixes for Seals, RUBBER WORLD 25-30 (1993). This method may be accelerated and is often used for the vulcanization of elastomer compositions.


Accelerators include amines, guanidines, thioureas, thiazoles, thiurams, sulfenamides, sulfenimides, thiocarbamates, xanthates, and the like. Acceleration of the cure process may be accomplished by adding to the composition an amount of the accelerant. The mechanism for accelerated vulcanization of natural rubber involves complex interactions between the curative, accelerator, activators and polymers. Ideally, all of the available curative is consumed in the formation of effective crosslinks which join together two polymer chains and enhance the overall strength of the polymer matrix. Numerous accelerators are known in the art and include, but are not limited to, the following: stearic acid, diphenyl guanidine (DPG), tetramethylthiuram disulfide (TMTD), 4,4′-dithiodimorpholine (DTDM), tetrabutylthiuram disulfide (TBTD), 2,2′-benzothiazyl disulfide (MBTS), hexamethylene-1,6-bisthiosulfate disodium salt dihydrate, 2-(morpholinothio) benzothiazole (MBS or MOR), compositions of 90% MOR and 10% MBTS (MOR 90), N-tertiarybutyl-2-benzothiazole sulfenamide (TBBS), and N-oxydiethylene thiocarbamyl-N-oxydiethylene sulfonamide (OTOS), zinc 2-ethyl hexanoate (ZEH), N,N′-diethyl thiourea.


In one embodiment of the invention, at least one curing agent is present from 0.2 to 15 phr, and from 0.5 to 10 phr in another embodiment. Curing agents include those components described above that facilitate or influence the cure of elastomers, such as metals, accelerators, sulfur, peroxides, and other agents common in the art, and as described above.


Processing


Mixing of the components may be carried out by combining the polymer components and the clay in the form of an intercalate in any suitable mixing device such as a Banbury™ mixer, Brabender™ mixer or preferably a mixer/extruder. Mixing is performed at temperatures in the range from up to the melting point of the elastomer and/or secondary rubber used in the composition in one embodiment, from 80° C. up to 340° C. in another embodiment, and from 120° C. to 300° C. in yet another embodiment, under conditions of shear sufficient to allow the clay intercalate to exfoliate and become uniformly dispersed within the polymer to form the nanocomposite.


In the example compositions, the mixing was performed in a BR Banbury™ internal mixer by techniques known in the art. Typically, from 70% to 100% of the elastomer or elastomers is first mixed for 20 to 90 seconds, or until the temperature reaches from 40 to 60° C. Then, ¾ of the filler, and the remaining amount of elastomer, if any, is typically added to the mixer, and mixing continues until the temperature reaches from 90 to 150° C. Next, the remaining filler is added, as well as the processing oil, and mixing continues until the temperature reaches from 140 to 190° C. The finished mixture is then finished by sheeting on an open mill and allowed to cool to from 60° C. to 100° C. when the curatives are added.


Mixing with the clays is performed by techniques known to those skilled in the art, wherein the clay is added to the polymer at the same time as the carbon black in one embodiment. The polybutene processing oil is typically added later in the mixing cycle after the carbon black and clay have achieved adequate dispersion in the elastomeric matrix.


The cured compositions of the invention can include various elastomers and fillers with the polybutene processing oil. The compositions of the invention typically include isobutylene-based elastomers such as halogenated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene), butyl rubber, or halogenated star-branched butyl rubber (HSSB) either alone, or some combination with one another, with the polybutene processing oil being present from 5 to 30 phr in one embodiment.


In one embodiment, the composition is halogenated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene) from 50 to 100 phr that may include natural rubber from 5 to 50 phr, and polybutene processing oil present from 5 to 30 phr, a filler such as a carbon black from 20 to 80 phr, and an exfoliating clay from 0.5 to 20 phr in one embodiment, and from 2 to 15 phr in another embodiment. The cure agents such as phenolic resins, sulfur, stearic acid, and zinc oxide, may be present from 0.1 to 5 phr.


In another embodiment, the composition may be a HSSB present from 50 to 100 phr that may include a halogenated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene) from 5 to 95 phr in one embodiment, and from 20 to 70 phr in another embodiment, and polybutene processing oil present from 3 to 30 phr, a filler such as a carbon black from 20 to 80 phr, and an exfoliating clay from 0.5 to 20 phr in one embodiment, and from 2 to 15 phr in another embodiment. The cure agents such as phenolic resins, sulfur, stearic acid, and zinc oxide, may be present from 0.1 to 5 phr.


In yet another embodiment, the composition may be a halogenated butyl rubber present from 50 to 100 phr that may include a halogenated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene) from 5 to 95 phr in one embodiment, and from 20 to 70 phr in another embodiment, and polybutene processing oil present from 3 to 30 phr, a filler such as a carbon black from 20 to 80 phr, and an exfoliating clay from 0.5 to 20 phr in one embodiment, and from 2 to 15 phr in another embodiment. The cure agents such as phenolic resins, sulfur, stearic acid, and zinc oxide, may be present from 0.1 to 5 phr.


The isobutylene-based elastomer useful in the invention can be blended with various other rubbers or plastics as disclosed herein, in particular thermoplastic resins such as nylons or polyolefins such as polypropylene or copolymers of polypropylene. These compositions are useful in air barriers such as bladders and innerliners, air sleeves (such as in air shocks), diaphragms, as well as other applications where high air or oxygen retention is desirable. In one embodiment, the cured composition has an air (air, oxygen or nitrogen at 65° C.) permeability of from 1.2×10−8 to 4×10−8 cm3-cm/cm2-sec-atm, and from 1.5×10−8 to 3.5×10−8 cm3-cm/cm2-sec-atm in another embodiment.


In one embodiment, an air barrier can be made by the method of combining at least one random copolymer comprising a C4 to C7 isomonoolefin derived unit, at least one filler, and polybutene oil having a number average molecular weight greater than 400, and at least one cure agent; and curing the combined components as described above.


Test Methods


Cure properties were measured using an ODR 2000 at the indicated temperature and 1 or 3 degree arc. Test specimens were cured at the indicated temperature, typically from 150° C. to 160° C., for a time corresponding to Tc90+appropriate mold lag. When possible, standard ASTM tests were used to determine the cured compound physical properties (see Table 2). Stress/strain properties (tensile strength, elongation at break, modulus values, energy to break) were measured at room temperature using an Instron 4202. Shore A hardness was measured at room temperature by using a Zwick Duromatic. The error (2σ) in measuring 100% Modulus is ±0.11 MPa units; the error (2σ) in measuring elongation is ±13 % units.


The values “MH” and “ML” used here and throughout the description refer to “maximum torque” and “minimum torque”, respectively. The “MS” value is the Mooney scorch value, the “ML(1+4)” value is the Mooney viscosity value. The error (2σ) in the later measurement is ±0.65 Mooney viscosity units. The values of “Tc” are cure times in minutes, and “Ts” is scorch time″ in minutes.


Molecular weight of the PARAPOL™ polybutene processing oil was determined by gel permeation chromatography, and the values of number average molecular weight (Mn) obtained have an error of ±20%. The techniques for determining the molecular weight (Mn and Mw) and molecular weight distribution (MWD) are generally described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,540,753 to Cozewith et al. and references cited therein, and in Verstrate et al., 21 MACROMOLECULES 3360 (1988). In a typical measurement, a 3-column set is operated at 30° C. The elution solvent used may be stabilized tetrahydrofuran (THF), or 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (TCB). The columns are calibrated using polystyrene standards of precisely known molecular weights. A correlation of polystyrene retention volume obtained from the standards, to the retention volume of the polymer tested yields the polymer molecular weight. The viscosity of the PARAPOL™ polybutene processing oil (Table 1) was determined as per ASTM D445-97.


Tensile measurements were done at ambient temperature on Instron Series IX Automated Materials Testing System 6.03.08. Micro tensile specimens (dog-bone shaped) width of 0.08 inches (0.20 cm) and a length of 0.2 inches (0.5 cm) length (between two tabs) were used. The thickness of the specimens varied and was measured manually by Mitutoyo Digimatic Indicator connected to the system computer. The specimens were pulled at a crosshead speed of 20 inches/min. (51 cm/min.) and the stress/strain data was recorded. The average stress/strain value of at least three specimens is reported. The error (2σ) in tensile measurements is ±0.47 MPa units.


Adhesion was tested using a one-inch strip adhesion, wherein one inch×three inch adhesive bonds to Kraft paper are prepared. Samples are hung horizontally (in peel mode) in an air circulating oven and a 100 gram weight is suspended from the free end of the bond. The oven temperature is raised 10° F. (4.1° C.) every 15 minutes. The peel-fail temperature is the average of three readings.


The error in the fatigue-to-failure values is ±20%.


Oxygen permeability was measured using a MOCON OxTran Model 2/61 operating under the principle of dynamic measurement of oxygen transport through a thin film as published by R. A. Pasternak et al. in 8 JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE: PART A -2 467 (1970). The units of measure are cc-mil/m2-day-mmHg. Generally, the method is as follows: flat film or rubber samples are clamped into diffusion cells which are purged of residual oxygen using an oxygen free carrier gas. The carrier gas is routed to a sensor until a stable zero value is established. Pure oxygen or air is then introduced into the outside of the chamber of the diffusion cells. The oxygen diffusing through the film to the inside chamber is conveyed to a sensor which measures the oxygen diffusion rate.


Air permeability was tested by the following method. Thin, vulcanized test specimens from the sample compositions were mounted in diffusion cells and conditioned in an oil bath at 65° C. The time required for air to permeate through a given specimen is recorded to determine its air permeability. Test specimens were circular plates with 12.7-cm diameter and 0.38-mm thickness. The error (2σ) in measuring air permeability is ±0.245 (×108) units. Other test methods are described in Table 2.







EXAMPLES

Compositions 1-15 (Tables 3-5) exemplify the benefits of incorporating polybutene processing oil into blends of isobutylene copolymers comprising a halomethylstyrene moiety. Compositions 1, 6, and 11 represent copolymers of halogenated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene) comprising various amounts of halogenation and amounts of p-methylstyrene (P.S.) (see Table 3). The compositions incorporating PARAPOL™ have improved air permeability, while improving or maintaining the processing properties such as green strength and fatigue to failure ratio values (Tables 6-8).


Compositions 16-21 (Table 9) exemplify the benefits of incorporating polybutene processing oil into blends of an isobutylene-based polymer such as HSSB with another rubber such as natural rubber, and an exfoliating clay. Composition 16 is the HSSB alone (SBB-6222, 100 phr), and Composition 17 is with natural rubber and PARAPOL™ alone (90 phr SBB, 10 phr natural rubber). Typically, halogenated rubbers such as HSSB have desirably low air permeability compared to, for example, natural rubber alone. When natural rubber is added to these compositions, it is known that the air permeability goes up, such as disclosed in Inner Liners for High Performance Tires, C. W. van Hellens in PROCEEDINGS OF RUBBER DIVISION, AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY (Indianapolis, Indiana, May 1984), and in Bromobutyl and Chlorobutyl: A Comparison of Their Chemistry, Properties and Uses, W. Hopkins, R. H. Jones, J. Walker in INTERNATIONAL RUBBER CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS 205 (Kyoto, October 1985). However, as seen in composition 17, when the polybutene is present, the air permeability is maintained or improved, even when natural rubber is present in the composition.


The addition of exfoliating clays can further improve air permeability of these halogenated elastomeric compositions. Compositions 18-21 incorporate various amounts of an exfoliating clay. These data show that natural rubber improves the processing of the HSSB (Tables 10A and 10B). Further improvement in air permeability (lower values) are achieved upon addition of the clay and PARAPOL™. The inclusion of a naphthenic oil (CALSOL™) in composition 19 actually disadvantageously increases air permeability of the blend.


Compositions 22-23 (Table 11) exemplify the benefits of incorporating polybutene processing oil into an elastomeric blend of a natural rubber, isobutylene copolymers comprising a halomethylstyrene moiety, and an exfoliating clay. These data show that the processing properties are improved or maintained, while the air permeability is lowered upon addition of PARAPOL™.


Compositions 24-28 (Table 12) further exemplify the benefits of incorporating polybutene processing oil into an elastomeric blend of a natural rubber, isobutylene copolymers comprising a halomethylstyrene moiety, and an exfoliating clay. Again, PARAPOL™ processing oil, polybutene, improves the air barrier properties of the blends, while maintaining or improving the processing properties. For example, the fatigue to failure values of the composition improves upon addition of PARAPOL™, as does the green strength (Tables 13A and 13B). Compositions 27 and 28 represent preferred elastomeric blends having the lowest air permeability values, wherein EXXPRO™ 89-4 is present with SBB-622 and natural rubber and PARAPOL™.


Compositions 29-44 exemplify the benefits of incorporating polybutene processing oils in various blends of isobutylene-based copolymers. The compositions 29-32 are blends of brominated butyl rubber (Bromobutyl 2222) with PARAPOL™ with and without clays. These data show that the addition of PARAPOL™ to compositions with (composition 31) and without (composition 30) an exfoliating clay improve the processing properties such as the fatigue-to-failure values, while improving the air permeability values. The composition with both clay and polybutene are improved relative to the other brominated butyl rubber compositions.


Compositions 33-36 exemplify the use of EXXPRO™ elastomers having a PMS level of 5 wt % relative to the copolymer as a whole. These data show that the addition of polybutene processing oil alone (composition 34) improves the air barrier qualities of the blend, and adding an exfoliating clay alone (composition 35) improves the air barrier qualities. The addition of both the polybutene processing oil and clay (composition 36) improves the air barrier qualities. The processing properties are improved for the 5 wt % PMS EXXPRO™ blends when the polybutene and clay (alone or together) are present, as evidenced by, for example, the green strength values and the fatigue-to-failure values.


Compositions 37-40 exemplify the use of EXXPRO™ elastomers having a PMS level of 7.5 wt % relative to the copolymer as a whole. Overall, the air permeability improves upon addition of PARAPOL™ and/or an exfoliating clay. Finally, compositions 41-44 exemplify the use of EXXPRO™ elastomers having a PMS level of 12 wt % relative to the copolymer as a whole. Again, the air permeability improves upon addition of the polybutene PARAPOL™ and/or an exfoliating clay, as well as the processing properties. Also, the fatigue-to-failure values in the 12 wt % PMS copolymer are improved relative to the 7.5 wt % PMS copolymers.


The inclusion of polybutene to the bromobutyl rubber and brominated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene) and nanoclay compositions tend to improve the air permeability, as shown by compositions 29-44 in Table 15B. In one embodiment, the air permeability (at 65° C.) ranges from 1.20×10−8 to 1.90×10−8 cm3-cm/cm2 -sec-atm for these compositions, and from 1.30×10−8 to 1.8×10−8 cm3-cm/cm2-sec-atm in another embodiment.


Overall, the inclusion of polybutene process oils having a number average molecular weight from 400 to 6000 in one embodiment, and a viscosity of from 10 to 10,000 cSt at 100° C. in another embodiment, have improved green strength and improved or maintained processability, as well as improved (lowered) air permeability. For example, the inclusion of polybutene in compositions of elastomers improves (increases) the fatigue-to-failure values. In particular, the fatigue-to-failure ratios improve when polybutene is added to elastomer/nanoclay compositions.


In one embodiment of the elastomeric nanocomposite compositions, where the elastomer is bromobutyl rubber, the unaged fatigue-to-failure values are greater than 40,000 units, and greater than 50,000 in another embodiment, and greater than 60,000 in yet another embodiment. In another embodiment, where the elastomer is a brominated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene), the fatigue-to-failure values are greater than 70,000, and greater than 80,000 in another embodiment. The increase in the fatigue-to-failure values upon incorporation of polybutene into the compositions is particularly advantageous when clays are present, as these values tend to decrease upon addition of clays to an elastomer. In another embodiment of the elastomeric compositions, the green strength is greater than 45 units, and greater than 50 units in another embodiment. These values, of course, may be further improved by changing the amounts of the various components in the compositions, or the viscosity and/or molecular weight of the polybutene.


Embodiments of the final nanocomposite of the present invention are useful as air barriers, such as used in producing innerliners, or innertubes for motor vehicle tires, or hoses for motor vehicles. In particular, the nanocomposites are useful in innerliners in articles such as truck tires, bus tires, passenger automobile, motorcycle tires, off the road tires, and the like. The improved heat aging resistance of the present innerliner composition makes it particularly suited for use in truck tires to increase the retreading capability of the tire.


While the present invention has been described and illustrated by reference to particular embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the invention lends itself to many different variations not illustrated herein. For these reasons, then, reference should be made solely to the appended claims for purposes of determining the true scope of the present invention.


All priority documents are herein fully incorporated by reference for all jurisdictions in which such incorporation is permitted. Further, all documents cited herein, including testing procedures, are herein fully incorporated by reference for all jurisdictions in which such incorporation is permitted.









TABLE 2







Test Methods









Parameter
Units
Test





Mooney Viscosity
ML 1 + 8, 125° C., MU
ASTM D 1646


(BIMS polymer)

(modified)


Mooney Viscosity
ML 1 + 4, 100° C., MU
ASTM D 1646


(composition)


Air permeability
cm3-cm/cm2-sec-atm
See text


Brittleness
° C.
ASTM D 746


Green Strength
PSI
ASTM D 412


(100% Modulus)


Mooney Viscosity
ML1 + 4, 100° C., MU
ASTM D 1646


(compound)


Mooney Scorch Time
Ts5, 125° C., minutes
ASTM D 1646


Oscillating Disk


Rheometer (ODR)


@ 160° C., ± 3° arc


ML
deciNewton.meter


MH
dNewton.m


Ts2
minute


Tc90
minute


Cure rate
dN.m/minute
ASTM D 2084


Physical Properties


press cured Tc


90 + 2 min @ 160° C.


Hardness
Shore A
ASTM D 2240


Modulus 100%
MPa
ASTM D 412 die C


Tensile Strength
MPa


Elongation at Break
%


Hot Air Aging,

ASTM D 573


72 hrs. @ 125° C.


Hardness Change
%


Tensile Change
%


Elongation Change
%


Weight Change
%


Tear Strength
N/mm
ASTM D 624


Die B & Die C


Fatigue to Failure
cycles
ASTM 4482 using




Cam 24 (136%




extension)
















TABLE 3







Components and Commercial Sources









Component
Brief Description
Commercial Source





BENTON ™-34
Dimethylditallowammonium
Elementis Specialties



chloride modified
(Belleville, NJ)



montmorillonite clay


Bromobutyl 2222
Brominated Poly(isobutylene-
ExxonMobil Chemical



co-isoprene), Mooney
Company (Houston, TX)



Viscosity (1 + 8, 125° C.) of



from 27-37 MU


CALSOL ™ 810
Naphthenic Oil
R. E. Carroll, Inc



ASTM Type 103
(Trenton, NJ)


CAPTAX ™
2-mercaptobenzothiazole
R. T. Vanderbilt


CLAYTONE ™-40
Dimethylditallowammonium
Southern Clay Products



chloride modified
(Gonzalez, TX)



montmorillonite clay


CLOISITE ™-25
Dimethylditallowammonium
Southern Clay Products



chloride modified
(Gonzalez, TX)



montmorillonite clay


ESCOREZ ™
Aromatic modified aliphatic
ExxonMobil Chemical



resin, 95° C. softening point
Company (Houston, TX)


EXXPRO ™ 3035
5 wt % PMS, 0.5 mol %
ExxonMobil Chemical



BrPMS, Mooney Viscosity 40-50.
Company (Houston, TX)


EXXPRO ™ 89-4
5 wt % PMS, 0.75 mol %
ExxonMobil Chemical



BrPMS, Mooney viscosity of
Company (Houston, TX)



45 ± 5 MU (1 + 8, 125° C.)


EXXPRO ™ 01-4
7.5 wt % PMS, 0.85 mol %
ExxonMobil Chemical



BrPMS, Mooney viscosity of
Company (Houston, TX)



45 ± 5 MU (1 + 8, 125° C.)


EXXPRO ™ 96-4
12 wt % PMS, 0.85 mol %
ExxonMobil Chemical



BrPMS, Mooney viscosity of
Company (Houston, TX)



45 ± 5 MU (1 + 8, 125° C.)


KADOX ™ 930
High Purity French
Zinc Corp. of America



Process Zinc Oxide
(Monaca, Pa)


Maglite-K
vulcanizer
C. P. Hall (Chicago, IL)


PARAPOL ™
C4 raffinate
ExxonMobil Chemical




Company (Houston, TX)


Rosin Oil MR-1085 A
tackifier
Sovereign Chemical (Akron,




OH)


SP-1068
Brominated phenol-
Schenectady International



formaldehyde resin
(Schenectady, NY)


SBB
Star-branched butyl rubber
ExxonMobil Chemical



6222
Company (Houston, TX)


Stearic acid
Cure agent
e.g., C. K. Witco Corp. (Taft,




LA)


Sulfur
cure agent
e.g., R. E. Carroll (Trenton,




NJ)


TMTD
tetramethylthiuram disulfide
e.g., R. T. Vanderbilt




(Norwalk, CT)


Zinc Oxide 911, 720-C
activators
C. P. Hall (Chicago, IL)










Components of Comparative and Example Compositions 1-5












Component (phr)
1
2
3
4
5





EXXPRO ™ 89-4
100.00 
100.00 
100.00 
100.00 
100.00 


(5 wt % PMS, 0.75 mol % BrPMS)


Carbon Black N660
60.00 
60.00 
60.00 
60.00 
60.00 


CALSOL ™-810
8.00






STRUKTOL ™-40MS
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00


SP-1068
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00


ESCOREZ ™-2510
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00


Stearic Acid
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00


PARAPOL ™-700

8.00





PARAPOL ™-950


8.00




PARAPOL ™-1300



8.00



PARAPOL ™-2400




8.00


Zinc Oxide 911
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00


MBTS
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25


Sulfur
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
















TABLE 4







Components of Comparative and Example Compositions 6-10












Component (phr)
6
7
8
9
10















EXXPRO ™ 01-4
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00


(7.5 wt % PMS,


0.85 mol % BrPMS)


Carbon Black N660
60.00
60.00
60.00
60.00
60.00


CALSOL ™-810
8.00






STRUKTOL ™-40 MS
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00


SP-1068
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00


ESCOREZ ™-2510
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00


Stearic Acid
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00


PARAPOL ™-700

8.00





PARAPOL ™-950


8.00




PARAPOL ™-1300



8.00



PARAPOL ™-2400




8.00


Zinc Oxide 911
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00


MBTS
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25


Sulfur
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
















TABLE 5







Components of Comparative and Example Compositions 11-15












Component (phr)
11
12
13
14
15















EXXPRO ™ 96-4
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00
100.00


(12 wt % PMS,


0.85 mol % BrPMS)


Carbon Black N660
60.00
60.00
60.00
60.00
60.00


CALSOL ™-810
8.00






STRUKTOL ™-40 MS
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00


SP-1068
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00


ESCOREZ ™-2510
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00


Stearic Acid
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00


PARAPOL ™-700

8.00





PARAPOL ™-950


8.00




PARAPOL ™-1300



8.00



PARAPOL ™-2400




8.00


Zinc Oxide 911
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00


MBTS
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25


Sulfur
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
















TABLE 6







Properties of Compositions 1-5












Property
1
2
3
4
5















Mooney scorch @ 135° C., T5, min.
20.47
21.85
21.40
22.22
22.32


Mooney viscosity @ 100° C.
69.1
71.8
71.9
72.4
72.0


ODR, 3° Arc @ 160° C.


MH-ML
26.98
25.74
25.29
25.44
25.40


ML
13.17
14.48
14.51
14.54
15.15


MH
40.15
40.22
39.80
39.98
40.55


Ts2, min.
5.04
5.44
5.52
5.43
5.95


Tc50, min.
9.05
10.03
9.98
10.23
10.51


Tc90, min.
14.22
15.67
15.46
16.13
16.45


Hardness, Shore A
56
57
57
53
52


Aged Hardness (72 h @ 125° C.)
65
61
61
62
57


100% Modulus, MPa
1.81
1.69
1.85
2.03
1.87


300% Modulus, MPa
5.63
5.63
6.00
6.20
6.13


Tensile, MPa
9.89
10.33
10.10
10.85
10.89


Elongation, %
702%
730%
676%
729%
694%


Aged 100% Modulus, MPa
3.06
2.29
2.54
2.72
2.68


Aged 300% Modulus, MPa
8.29
7.16
7.38
7.55
7.75


Aged Tensile, MPa
10.43
10.26
10.32
11.02
11.03


Aged Elongation, %
500%
555%
555%
617%
546%


Adhesion @ RT (Self-Carcass), N/mm
31.70
32.18
31.81
31.22
31.97


Adhesion @ 100 C. (Self-Carcass), N/mm
22.16
21.55
24.96
29.63
24.11


Green Strength, Modulus @ 100% PSI
49.01
53.65
55.25
56.70
55.68


Time to Decay 75%
3.10
3.78
3.46
4.56
3.72


Tear Resistance-N/mm
40.04
41.93
40.51
42.31
40.92


Aged Die-C Tear Resistance-N/mm
39.13
37.82
35.05
37.48
38.35


Fatigue to Failure
1.50E+05
1.66E+05
1.90E+05
1.08E+05
9.79E+04


Fatigue to Failure (Aged)
2.11E+04
3.68E+04
5.56E+04
3.50E+04
7.11E+04


Air Permeability-(To Air)-65° C.,
2.56
2.11
2.02
1.92
1.84


cm3-cm/cm2-sec-atm (×108)
















TABLE 7







Properties of Compositions 6-10












Property
6
7
8
9
10















Mooney scorch @ 135° C., T5
16.97
18.33
17.93
18.33
18.75


Mooney viscosity @ 100° C.
67.0
68.5
70.4
69.0
70.1


ODR, 3° Arc @ 160° C., 60 min


MH-ML
28.41
26.83
27.77
27.54
27.31


ML
13.89
14.40
15.36
14.81
12.91


MH
42.30
41.23
43.13
42.35
40.22


Ts2
4.49
4.80
4.78
4.64
4.88


Tc50
7.68
8.76
8.71
8.95
8.53


Tc90
11.15
13.11
13.13
13.66
12.58


Hardness, Shore A
56
55
57
58
59


Aged Hardness (72 h @ 125° C.)
61
59
59
61
62


100% Modulus, MPa
1.97
1.98
1.78
1.91
1.81


300% Modulus, MPa
6.24
6.10
5.92
5.98
6.11


Tensile, MPa
10.36
10.68
10.41
9.60
10.91


Elongation, %
747%
756%
667%
621%
694%


Aged 100% Modulus, MPa
3.65
2.77
2.38
2.66
2.65


Aged 300% Modulus, MPa
9.48
7.91
7.45
7.78
8.01


Aged Tensile, MPa
11.22
10.55
10.24
10.98
11.20


Aged Elongation, %
480%
548%
476%
586%
527%


Adhesion @ RT (Self-Carcass), N/mm
32.11
32.21
31.34
30.54
32.85


Adhesion @ 100 C. (Self-Carcass), N/mm
25.75
19.45
25.00
20.08
24.02


Green Strength, Modulus @ 100% PSI
53.94
56.70
58.29
56.41
59.02


Time to Decay 75%
3.58
4.76
4.91
4.90
4.80


Tear Resistance-N/mm
40.87
39.02
39.06
38.62
40.97


Aged Die-C Tear Resistance-N/mm
35.51
37.26
34.79
35.78
36.83


Fatigue to Failure
1.51E+05
1.85E+05
1.09E+05
1.29E+05
1.53E+05


Fatigue to Failure (Aged)
5.29E+04
4.73E+04
4.13E+04
2.20E+04
3.03E+04


Air Permeability-(To Air)-65° C.,
2.37
2.07
1.84
1.58
1.73


cm3-cm/cm2-sec-atm (×108)
















TABLE 8







Properties of Compositions 11-15












Property
11
12
13
14
15















Mooney scorch @ 135° C., T5
19.17
20.48
20.80
20.87
20.05


Mooney viscosity @ 100° C.
66.7
67.8
69.3
70.2
69.8


ODR, 3° Arc @ 160° C., 60 min


MH-ML
27.42
26.67
27.05
24.81
27.13


ML
15.03
12.97
13.57
13.90
13.94


MH
42.45
39.64
40.62
38.71
41.07


Ts2
4.85
5.11
5.23
5.21
5.16


Tc50
9.15
9.76
9.91
9.52
9.86


Tc90
14.10
15.32
15.53
14.39
15.54


Hardness, Shore A
59
60
60
60
61


Aged Hardness (72 h @ 125° C.)
65
61
66
66
65


100% Modulus, MPa
1.91
2.08
2.34
2.53
2.17


300% Modulus, MPa
6.01
6.50
6.86
7.22
7.00


Tensile, MPa
10.28
10.59
10.71
10.51
11.32


Elongation, %
668%
678%
638%
597%
633%


Aged 100% Modulus, MPa
3.60
3.33
3.32
3.55
3.48


Aged 300% Modulus, MPa
9.71
8.59
8.50
8.82
9.40


Aged Tensile, MPa
11.36
11.21
10.85
10.66
12.10


Aged Elongation, %
438%
480%
474%
435%
506%


Adhesion @ RT (Self-Carcass), N/mm
31.54
31.05
29.82
28.28
30.79


Adhesion @ 100 C. (Self-Carcass), N/mm
24.30
19.34
18.65
25.14
21.23


Green Strength, Modulus @ 100% PSI
53.80
58.00
62.06
63.22
65.98


Time to Decay 75%
3.12
3.54
3.60
3.42
4.97


Tear Resistance-N/mm
37.66
41.98
37.40
37.98
38.48


Aged Die-C Tear Resistance-N/mm
32.93
35.08
34.17
33.39
34.43


Fatigue to Failure (Unaged)
1.12E+05
6.40E+04
9.00E+04
7.42E+04
5.62E+04


Fatigue to Failure (Aged)
1.23E+04
2.51E+04
2.03E+04
1.23E+04
2.55E+04


Air Permeability-(To Air)-65° C.,
2.48
2.03
1.98
2.07
1.82


cm3-cm/cm2-sec-atm (×108)
















TABLE 9







Components of Comparative and Example Compositions 16-21













Component (phr)
16
17
18
19
20
21
















SBB-6222
100.0
90.0
80.0
80.0
80.0
80.0


Natural Rubber

10.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0


Carbon black N660
60.0
60.0
55.0
55.0
55.0
55.0


CALSOL ™ 810
14.0


7.0




Rosin Oil MR-1085 A
4.0







Stearic acid
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0


SP-1068

4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0


STRUKTOL ™-40 MS

7.0
7.0

7.0
7.0


PARAPOL ™-2500

7.0
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00


CLOISITE-25


5.00
5.00




Bentone-34





5.00


Claytone-40




5.00



ZINC OXIDE 720-C
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00


MBTS
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25


sulfur
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
















TABLE 10A







Properties of Compositions 16-21













Property
16
17
18
19
20
21
















Mooney scorch @ 135° C., T5
9.02
12.73
11.72
10.77
9.43
10.1


Mooney scorch @ 135° C., T10
10.35
15.80
17.43
15.67
15.57
15.9


Mooney viscosity (1 + 4) @100° C.
41.20
57.00
47.30
34.90
43.30
48.80


ODR, 1° ARC, 150° C.


MH-ML
5.37
6.79
6.15
6.48
6.35
6.41


ML
3.69
5.95
5.21
3.98
4.86
5.31


MH
9.06
12.74
11.36
10.46
11.21
11.72


Ts2
4.08
7.22
10.07
8.89
9.32
8.22


Tc50
4.52
9.17
14.96
12.17
13.42
12.04


Tc90
8.52
16.14
25.24
21.82
24.62
22.29


Hardness, SHORE A
49
52
53
49
54
54


Aged Hardness, 120 Hrs @ 100° C.
67
62
63
62
60
60


100% Modulus, MPa
1.24
1.06
1.25
0.94
1.20
1.39


300% Modulus, MPa
4.11
2.77
3.53
2.65
3.05
4.02


Tensile, MPa
7.90
8.14
8.34
7.13
8.6
7.87


Elongation, %
606
876
704
672
913
605


aged 100% Modulus, MPa
2.79
2.00
1.81
1.83
1.78
1.77


aged 300% Modulus, MPa
8.81
5.86
4.97
6.20
5.11
4.88


aged Tensile, MPa
10.62
8.56
7.73
8.03
8.04
7.33


aged Elongation, %
432
563
543
406
552
521


Fatigue to Failure (unaged)
1,500,000
547,849
464,640
122,194
422,545
135,413


Unaged Adhesion @ R.T.-(Self-Self)
20.85
24.08
16.79
11.74
15.77
22.72


Adhesion @ 100° C. (Self-Self)
11.91
14.56
7.97
3.89
6.14
10.17


Adhesion @ RT (Self-Carcass)
4.59
17.61
14.41
8.92
11.25
14.89


Adhesion @ 100° C. (Self-Carcass)
4.44
2.99
4.03
4.51
5.16
7.10
















TABLE 10B







Properties of Compositions 16-21













Property
16
17
18
19
20
21
















Green Strength,
44.23
59.16
55.68
43.21
66.41
67.43


Modulus @ 100% PSI


Time to Decay 75%
2.81
9.10
9.38
6.79
14.85
24.57


from strain end point min


Die B Tear Resistance-N/mm
47.74
48.27
49.93
39.86
50.04
47.61


Die C Tear Resistance-N/mm
25.01
30.38
28.38
20.87
27.20
27.39


Air Permeability, @ 65° C.,
3.31
2.49
2.86
3.57
2.66
2.78


cm3-cm/cm2-sec-atm (×108)


N2 Permeability, @ 65° C.,
2.98
2.31
2.57
2.99
2.36
2.71


cm3-cm/cm2-sec-atm (×108)


Brittleness, ° C.
−45
−37
−37
−44
−37
−41
















TABLE 11







Components and Properties of Example Compositions 22-23












22
23















Component (phr)





EXXPRO ™ 3035
80.00
80.00



Natural rubber
20.00
20.00



Carbon black N-660
35.00
35.00



CLAYTONE 40
5.00
5.00



CALSOL ™ 810
7.00




PARAPOL ™ 2400

7.00



Rosin oil
4.00
4.00



Stearic acid
1.00
1.00



KADOX ™ 911
1.00
1.00



MBTS
1.25
1.25



sulfur
0.50
0.50



Property



Mooney scorch @ 135 C., T5, min.
10.30
10.65



Mooney scorch @ 135 C., T10, min.
11.30
11.67



Mooney scorch @ 100° C.
44.70
49.70



ODR @ 150° C., 1 degree arc



MH-ML
6.60
6.18



ML
6.15
6.74



MH
12.75
12.92



Ts2, min.
5.96
6.67



Tc50, min.
7.87
8.51



Tc90, min.
17.46
18.34



Hardness, Shore A
38.50
39.10



100% Modulus, MPa
1.12
1.12



200% Modulus, MPa
1.55
1.58



300% Modulus, MPa
2.01
2.16



Tensile, MPa
3.90
4.66



Elongation, %
778.00
824.00



Green Strength, 100% Modulus-PSI
48.87
53.07



Time to Decay 75%
5.53
7.88



Air Permeability, @ 65° C., cm3-cm/
4.54
3.67



cm2-sec-atm (×108)

















TABLE 12







Components of Example Compositions 24-28












Components (phr)
24
25
26
27
28















SBB-6222
100.0
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0


EXXPRO ™-89-4


20.00
40.00
60.00


Natural Rubber

20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0


Carbon black-N-660
60.0
50.0
55.0
55.0
55.0


CLOISITE-25

10.00
5.00
5.00
5.00


CALSOL ™-810
14.0






Rosin Oil MR-1085 A
4.0






Stearic acid
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0


SP-1068

4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0


STRUKTOL ™-40 MS

7.0
7.0
7.0
7.0


PARAPOL ™-2500

7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00


ZINC OXIDE 720-C
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
3.00


MBTS
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25


sulfur
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
















TABLE 13A







Properties of Example Compositions 24-28












Property
24
25
26
27
28















Mooney scorch @ 135° C., T5, min.
9.02
11.42
5.55
3.68
1.82


Mooney scorch @ 135° C., T10, min.
10.35
16.73
8.55
4.72
2.53


Mooney scorch @ 100° C.
41.20
43.8
53.7
65.5
90.4


ODR, ARC 1°, 150° C.


MH-ML
5.37
6.20
7.81
8.81
8.05


ML
3.69
5.23
6.38
7.85
9.69


MH
9.06
11.43
14.19
16.66
17.74


Ts-2
4.08
11.02
9.47
8.08
8.18


Tc-50
4.52
15.12
14.58
14.58
14.67


Tc-90
8.52
26.25
25.13
25.23
25.71


Hardness, Shore A
49
57
58
59
60


Aged Hardness, 120 hr @ 100° C.
67
63
63
60
63


100% Modulus, MPa
1.24
1.28
1.49
2.17
2.47


300% Modulus, MPa
4.11
3.12
4.56
6.28
6.77


Tensile, MPa
7.90
6.99
9.33
10.29
9.15


Elongation, %
606
660
658
598
521


Aged 100% Modulus, MPa
2.79
1.87
2.12
2.74
2.89


Aged 300% Modulus, MPa
8.81
4.87
5.72
7.3
8.35


Aged Tensile, MPa
10.62
6.58
8.04
9.22
9.7


Aged Elongation, %
432
486
549
479
402


Fatigue-to-failure (unaged)
1,500,000
197,910
92,870
48,943
2,221


Adhesion @ RT (Self-Self), N/mm
20.85
13.34
20.45
23.91
23.8


Adhesion @ 100° C. (Self-Self), N/mm
11.91
4.13
7
8.42
7.45


Adhesion @ RT (Self-Carcass), N/mm
4.59
10.02
11.9
11.25
9.74


Adhesion @ 100° C. (Self-Carcass), N/mm
4.44
3.12
4.74
1.15
0.78
















TABLE 13B







Properties of Example Compositions 24-28












Property
24
25
26
27
28















Green Strength, Modulus @ 100%
44.23
62.93
70.18
94.83
119.19


PSI


Time to Decay 75% from
2.81
11.91
46.92




strain end point min.


Die B Tear
47.74
41.46
58.02
60.12
63.12


Resistance-N/mm


Die C Tear
25.01
22.79
30.41
37.58
33.94


Resistance-N/mm


Air Permeability, @ 65° C.,
3.29
2.63
2.70
2.79
2.75


cm3-cm/cm2-sec-atm (×108)


N2 Permeability, @ 65° C.,
2.97
2.96
2.74
1.86
2.19


cm3-cm/cm2-sec-atm (×108)


Brittleness, ° C.
−45
−42
−42
−42
−41
















TABLE 14





Components of Example Compositions 29-44























Component
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36





Bromobutyl-2222
100.00 
100.00 
100.00 
100.00 






EXXPRO ™ 89-4




100.00 
100.00 
100.00 
100.00 


EXXPRO ™ 01-4










EXXPRO ™ 96-4










Carbon black-N-
60.00 
60.00 
60.00 
60.00 
60.00 
60.00 
60.00 
60.00 


660


CALSOL ™-810
8.00

8.00

8.00

8.00



STRUCKTOL ™-
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00


40 MS


SP-1068
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00


Stearic Acid
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00


PARAPOL ™-

8.00

8.00

8.00

8.00


1300


Maglite-K
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15


0.15
0.15


CLOISITE-25A


4.00
4.00


4.00
4.00


ZINC OXIDE-911
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00


MBTS
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25


sulfur
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50





Component
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44





Bromobutyl-2222










EXXPRO ™ 89-4










EXXPRO ™ 01-4
100.00 
100.00 
100.00 
100.00 






EXXPRO ™ 96-4




100.00 
100.00 
100.00 
100.00 


Carbon black-N-
60.00 
60.00 
60.00 
60.00 
60.00 
60.00 
60.00 
60.00 


660


CALSOL ™-810
8.00

8.00


8.00

8.00


STRUCKTOL ™-
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00
7.00


40 MS


SP-1068
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.00


Stearic Acid
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00


PARAPOL ™-

8.00

8.00
8.00

8.00



1300


Maglite-K


0.15
0.15

0.15
0.15



CLOISITE-25A


4.00
4.00

4.00
4.00



ZINC OXIDE-911
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00


MBTS
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25
1.25


sulfur
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
















TABLE 15A





Properties of Compositions 29-44
























Property
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37





Mooney scorch @
17.30
18.45
15.42
15.73
15.23
16.73
2.72
1.27
16.33


135° C., T5


Mooney scorch @
20.10
21.52
19.13
19.18
18.23
19.77
3.22
1.83
19.42


135° C., T10


Mooney viscosity (1 +
59.3
63.0
58.3
61.4
68.8
72.1
81.4
109.9
68.3


4) @ 100° C.


ODR, 3° ARC,


160° C.


MH-ML
24.63
23.99
27.97
25.54
27.91
25.85
32.58
29.46
30.12


ML
9.76
10.52
9.88
10.89
12.87
14.76
17.84
21.29
11.40


MH
34.39
34.51
37.85
36.43
40.78
40.61
50.42
50.75
41.52


Ts2
2.00
2.00
4.32
4.41
4.27
4.68
4.75
4.46
3.63


Tc50
9.56
10.06
11.96
11.99
8.38
8.48
14.72
14.84
7.63


Tc90
20.72
19.35
21.60
20.82
13.03
12.76
29.32
30.62
11.70


Hardness, Shore A
46
49
52
52
51
53
56
56
57


Aged Hardness, 72
61
59
65
61
64
62
64
59
68


Hrs @ 125° C.


100% Modulus, MPa
1.17
1.28
1.53
1.57
1.85
1.89
3.07
3.39
2.00


300% Modulus, MPa
4.32
4.27
5.22
5.38
6.07
6.06
9.15
10.15
6.03


Tensile, MPa
10.45
10.49
10.22
10.85
10.14
10.73
11.77
12.04
9.97


Elongation, %
712
757
644
662
651
738
469
398
675


Aged 100% Modulus,
2.27
1.97
2.82
2.16
3.25
2.71
4.31
3.94
3.73


MPa


Aged 300% Modulus,
6.72
5.87
7.18
6.21
9.61
7.79
11.68
11.42
9.63


MPa


Aged Tensile, MPa
8.66
8.45
8.53
8.03
11.19
11.23
12.58
13.77
10.97


Aged Elongation, %
480
572
443
523
462
566
374
418
455


Fatigue to Failure
31,437
56,984
24,986
53,965
106,159
85,362
17,298
12,471
80,001


(Unaged)


Fatigue to Failure (Aged)
6,934
20,197
13,702
26,046
14,698
16,317
6,538
8,011
12,878


Unaged Adhesion @
32.79
31.98
19.72
23.62
30.57
29.11
23.54
25.00
29.86


RT (Self-Carcass), N/mm


Unaged Adhesion @
19.10
18.33
8.66
10.55
17.98
17.77
10.30
10.72
19.25


100° C.


(Self-Carcass),


N/mm

















Property
38
39
40
41
42
43
44





Mooney scorch @ 135° C., T5
16.72
5.12
3.78
16.17
17.48
4.05
16.55


Mooney scorch @ 135° C., T10
19.55
6.27
4.53
19.38
20.78
4.88
19.35


Mooney viscosity (1 + 4) @ 100° C.
71.0
70.6
77.7
67.9
70.6
71.6
67.2


ODR, 3° ARC, 160° C.


MH-ML
27.90
31.88
30.20
29.05
27.63
24.91
27.98


ML
13.36
13.54
16.72
12.12
13.85
14.05
12.72


MH
41.26
45.42
46.92
41.17
41.48
38.96
40.70


Ts2
4.10
4.24
4.79
4.15
4.36
4.20
4.21


Tc50
7.89
14.22
15.17
8.03
8.95
18.01
7.97


Tc90
11.92
29.10
31.18
12.48
14.39
45.37
12.86


Hardness, Shore A
56
57
60
56
56
59
52


Aged Hardness, 72 Hrs @ 125° C.
63
68
63
67
64
65
65


100% Modulus, MPa
1.80
2.39
2.65
2.00
2.04
2.34
1.62


300% Modulus, MPa
5.94
7.09
8.06
5.95
6.27
7.18
5.70


Tensile, MPa
10.88
10.99
12.05
10.00
10.67
12.52
10.00


Elongation, %
707
619
598
676
675
659
701


Aged 100% Modulus, MPa
2.58
4.21
3.56
3.8
2.89
3.92
2.95


Aged 300% Modulus, MPa
7.91
10.32
9.72
9.92
8.2
10.13
8.84


Aged Tensile, MPa
10.82
11.49
12.13
11.02
10.83
12.37
10.89


Aged Elongation, %
520
428
479
408
514
462
467


Fatigue to Failure (Unaged)
123,851
107,148
74,309
104,171
59,696
102,587
181,028


Fatigue to Failure (Aged)
44,506
21,898
22,871
9,982
12,792
41,154
12,295


Unaged Adhesion @ RT (Self-Carcass),
27.68
24.32
24.46
25.86
23.89
17.14
29.14


N/mm


Unaged Adhesion @ 100° C. (Self-
17.17
9.56
12.25
14.77
14.46
7.59
16.30


Carcass), N/mm
















TABLE 15B







Properties of Compositions 29-44























Property
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44


























Green Strength,
37.70
41.91
44.52
52.20
49.30
56.26
104.69
87.29
48.00
57.13
64.09
86.42
52.93
59.60
82.65
61.34


Modulus @ 100% PSI


Time to Decay 75% from
1.39
1.58
2.06
2.95
3.21
3.55
70.15
>5 min.
2.46
2.93
4.42
11.93
3.08
3.61
8.63
4.09


strain end


point min.


Die B Tear Resistance-
60.70
62.50
60.82
71.00
70.64
70.28
76.05
84.18
66.50
70.18
74.16
86.90
68.16
71.34
75.40
70.03


N/mm


Aged Die B Tear
57.93
57.02
56.84
53.23
72.86
71.52
79.24
77.52
68.91
69.33
76.10
82.22
66.98
71.54
82.59
71.30


Resistance-N/mm


Die C Tear Resistance-N/mm
35.00
37.02
33.25
35.49
39.67
38.66
41.30
35.52
37.36
39.78
38.53
40.84
36.93
41.95
37.64
39.90


Aged Die C Tear
30.48
29.92
29.01
29.72
36.14
36.97
36.73
36.90
32.82
34.48
40.58
38.55
33.76
35.20
39.77
34.54


Resistance-N/mm


Air Permeability 65° C. −1,
2.04
1.59
1.68
1.42
1.75
1.43
1.55
1.45
1.67
1.53
1.65
1.21
1.74
1.35
1.32
1.53


cm3-cm/cm2-sec-


atm (×108)


Air Permeability 65° C. −2,
1.91
1.54
1.64
1.43
1.84
1.46
1.59
1.48
1.52
1.69
1.62
1.18
1.54
1.30
1.23
1.78


cm3-cm/cm2-sec-


atm (×108)


Average
1.98
1.57
1.66
1.43
1.80
1.45
1.57
1.47
1.60
1.61
1.64
1.20
1.64
1.33
1.28
1.66








Claims
  • 1. An elastomer nanocomposite composition comprising: a matrix of at least one elastomer component comprising a random copolymer comprising a C4 to C7 isomonoolefin derived unit as a continuous phase;carbon black as a dispersed phase;at least one exfoliated clay as a dispersed phase; andpolybutene oil having a number average molecular weight greater than 400.
  • 2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the composition is a nanocomposite including an exfoliated clay selected from the group consisting of exfoliated natural or synthetic montmorillonite, nontronite, beidellite, volkonskoite, laponite, hectorite, saponite, sauconite, magadite, kenyaite, stevensite, vermiculite, halloysite, aluminate oxides, hydrotalcite, and mixtures thereof, and wherein the composition also comprises a thermoplastic resin containing nitrogen, oxygen, halogen, sulfur or another group capable of interacting with aromatic functional groups in the poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene).
  • 3. The composition of claim 1, wherein the copolymer is selected from the group consisting of a halogenated poly(isobutylene-co-p-methylstyrene), halogenated star-branched butyl rubber, halogenated butyl rubber, and mixtures thereof.
  • 4. The composition of claim 1, further comprising a thermoplastic resin selected from the group consisting of polyamides, polyimides, polycarbonates, polyesters, polysulfones, polylactones, polyacetals, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene resins (ABS), polyphenyleneoxides (PPO), polyphenylene sulfides (PPS), polystyrenes, styrene-acrylonitrile resins (SAN), styrene maleic anhydride resins (SMA), aromatic polyketones (PEEK, PED, and PEKK), and combinations thereof.
  • 5. The composition of claim 1, wherein the polybutene oil has a molecular weight of less than 10,000.
  • 6. The composition of claim 1, wherein the polybutene oil is present from 2 to 40 phr.
  • 7. The composition of claim 1, further comprising a filler selected from the group consisting of calcium carbonate, clay, mica, silica and silicates, talc, titanium dioxide, starch, wood flour, and mixtures thereof.
  • 8. The composition of claim 1, wherein the exfoliated clay is selected from the group consisting of exfoliated natural or synthetic montmorillonite, nontronite, beidellite, volkonskoite, laponite, hectorite, saponite, sauconite, magadite, kenyaite, stevensite, vermiculite, halloysite, aluminate oxides, hydrotalcite, and mixtures thereof.
  • 9. The composition of claim 1, wherein the polybutene oil has a viscosity of from 10 to 6000 cSt at 100° C.
  • 10. The composition of claim 1, wherein the polybutene oil has a viscosity of from 35 to 5000 cSt at 100° C.
  • 11. The composition of claim 1, wherein naphthenic oil is substantially absent.
  • 12. The composition of claim 1, wherein the unaged fatigue-to-failure value of the composition is greater than 70,000 units.
  • 13. An elastomer composition comprising: a continuous phase of at least one vulcanized elastomer component comprised of a random copolymer comprising a C4 to C7 isomonoolefin derived unit,at least one filler dispersed therein,at least one exfoliated clay as a dispersed phase; andpolybutene processing oil having a number average molecular weight of from 400 to 10,000.
  • 14. The composition of claim 13, wherein the polybutene has a viscosity of from 10 to 6000 cSt at 100° C.
  • 15. The composition of claim 13, wherein the polybutene is present from 2 to 30 phr.
  • 16. The composition of claim 13, wherein naphthenic oil is substantially absent.
  • 17. The composition of claim 13, wherein the elastomer is a copolymer of a C4 to C7 isoolefin and a p-methylstyrene derived units.
  • 18. The composition of claim 13, wherein the elastomer is halogenated.
  • 19. The composition of claim 13, wherein the filler is carbon black.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/US01/42767 10/16/2001 WO 00 4/3/2003
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO02/48257 6/20/2002 WO A
US Referenced Citations (83)
Number Name Date Kind
2631984 Crawford et al. Mar 1953 A
3099644 Parker et al. Jul 1963 A
3813351 Thomson et al. May 1974 A
3898253 Buckler et al. Aug 1975 A
3981342 Farber et al. Sep 1976 A
4057090 Hoshikawa et al. Nov 1977 A
4090546 Honda et al. May 1978 A
4210187 Egan Jul 1980 A
4238383 Anderson Dec 1980 A
4279284 Spadone Jul 1981 A
4395506 Negano et al. Jul 1983 A
4465829 Graves Aug 1984 A
4502520 Sandstrom Mar 1985 A
4616048 De Trano et al. Oct 1986 A
4616686 Berta Oct 1986 A
4632963 Gardner et al. Dec 1986 A
4681921 Gardner et al. Jul 1987 A
4703091 Gardner et al. Oct 1987 A
4754793 Mohammed Jul 1988 A
4840988 Nakayama et al. Jun 1989 A
4919183 Dobson Apr 1990 A
4978714 Bayan et al. Dec 1990 A
5005625 Klemmensen et al. Apr 1991 A
5013793 Wang et al. May 1991 A
5040583 Lin et al. Aug 1991 A
5071913 Powers et al. Dec 1991 A
5120379 Noda et al. Jun 1992 A
5156921 Lin et al. Oct 1992 A
5162409 Mroczkowski Nov 1992 A
5162445 Powers et al. Nov 1992 A
5178702 Frerking, Jr. et al. Jan 1993 A
5182333 Powers et al. Jan 1993 A
5234987 Hubbard et al. Aug 1993 A
5242727 Briddell et al. Sep 1993 A
5286804 Powers et al. Feb 1994 A
5290886 Ellul Mar 1994 A
5292590 Lin et al. Mar 1994 A
5397832 Ellul Mar 1995 A
5491196 Beers et al. Feb 1996 A
5508334 Chen Apr 1996 A
5576372 Kresge et al. Nov 1996 A
5576373 Kresge et al. Nov 1996 A
5580513 Patitsas et al. Dec 1996 A
5594073 Crepeau et al. Jan 1997 A
5621045 Patel et al. Apr 1997 A
5631316 Costemalle et al. May 1997 A
5656694 Frechet et al. Aug 1997 A
5665183 Kresge et al. Sep 1997 A
5670577 Dawson, Jr. Sep 1997 A
5698640 Duvdevani et al. Dec 1997 A
5733621 Cotsakis et al. Mar 1998 A
5755899 Hecker et al. May 1998 A
5807629 Elspass et al. Sep 1998 A
5814693 Priest et al. Sep 1998 A
5817719 Zanzig et al. Oct 1998 A
5859114 Davis et al. Jan 1999 A
5883173 Elspass et al. Mar 1999 A
5922153 Beers et al. Jul 1999 A
5925702 Hecker et al. Jul 1999 A
5936023 Kato et al. Aug 1999 A
5959049 Powers et al. Sep 1999 A
5964969 Sandstrom Oct 1999 A
5973053 Usuki et al. Oct 1999 A
6014998 Mowdood et al. Jan 2000 A
6034164 Elspass et al. Mar 2000 A
6060549 Li et al. May 2000 A
6103817 Usuki et al. Aug 2000 A
6106941 Fisher et al. Aug 2000 A
6207764 Ignatz-Hoover Mar 2001 B1
6228978 Agarwal et al. May 2001 B1
6255389 Ouhadi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6323433 Mahaney et al. Nov 2001 B1
6326426 Ellul Dec 2001 B1
6326433 Wang et al. Dec 2001 B1
6624220 Waddell et al. Sep 2003 B1
6710116 Waddell et al. Mar 2004 B1
6939921 Waddell et al. Sep 2005 B2
20040030036 Waddell et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040087704 Jones et al. May 2004 A1
20040132894 Dias et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050027062 Waddell et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050137339 Waddell et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050222335 Jones et al. Oct 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (39)
Number Date Country
1094070 Nov 2002 CN
1242116 Jun 1967 DE
0 102 844 Mar 1984 EP
0 127 998 Dec 1984 EP
0 162 201 Nov 1985 EP
0 296 332 Dec 1988 EP
0 314 416 May 1989 EP
0 320 263 Jun 1989 EP
0376558 Apr 1990 EP
0 376 558 Jul 1990 EP
0 682 071 Jul 1997 EP
0 823 454 Feb 1998 EP
0 930 335 Jul 1999 EP
0 931 815 Jul 1999 EP
0 992 538 Apr 2000 EP
2299337 Oct 1996 GB
48-73448 Oct 1973 JP
51-40384 Apr 1976 JP
61-218650 Sep 1986 JP
3028244 Feb 1991 JP
5179068 Jul 1993 JP
11005874 Jan 1999 JP
2000-256493 Sep 2000 JP
05-179068 Jul 2005 JP
WO 8705310 Sep 1987 WO
01-146941 Jun 1989 WO
WO 9006859 Jun 1990 WO
04-283253 Oct 1992 WO
WO 9216587 Oct 1992 WO
WO 9401295 Jan 1994 WO
WO 9422680 Oct 1994 WO
WO 9640801 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9714748 Apr 1997 WO
WO 9853000 Nov 1998 WO
WO 9902601 Jan 1999 WO
WO 9931178 Jun 1999 WO
WO 0069966 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0132232 May 2001 WO
WO 0232992 Apr 2002 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20040132894 A1 Jul 2004 US