Elastomers having a reduced hysteresis via interaction of polymer with silica surfaces

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6252007
  • Patent Number
    6,252,007
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 11, 1997
    27 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 26, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
The reduction of hysteresis in a silica-filled, vulcanized elastomeric compound is produced by mixing diene monomer and optionally monovinyl aromatic monomer with an initiator and a coordinator; effecting polymerization conditions; terminating polymerization with a terminator containing an organo-tin group to form a tin-coupled diene elastomer; compounding the tin-coupled diene elastomer with an amorphous silica filler and a vulcanization agent; and, effecting vulcanization. A pneumatic tire tread stock incorporating the vulcanized elastomer compound exhibits decreased rolling resistance in the tire.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




The subject invention relates to the anionic polymerization of diene polymer and copolymer elastomers. More specifically, the present invention relates to anionic polymerization employing an organolithium initiator and a terminator modified with a coupling agent, providing improved interaction with silica filler surfaces and reducing compound viscosity for better processing.




Silica filled compounds which include diene polymers and copolymers prepared according to the present invention, have reduced hysteresis characteristics. Articles such as tires, power belts and the like which are prepared from these compounds exhibit increased rebound, decreased rolling resistance and less heat build-up during mechanical stress operations.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




In the art it is desirable to produce elastomeric compounds exhibiting reduced hysteresis when properly compounded with other ingredients such as reinforcing agents, followed by vulcanization. Such elastomers, when compounded, fabricated and vulcanized into components for constructing articles such as tires, power belts, and the like, will manifest properties of increased rebound, decreased rolling resistance and less heat-build up when subjected to mechanical stress during normal use.




The hysteresis of an elastomeric compound refers to the difference between the energy applied to deform an article made from the elastomeric compound and the energy released as the elastomeric compound returns to its initial, undeformed state. In pneumatic tires, lowered hysteresis properties are associated with reduced rolling resistance and heat build-up during operation of the tire. These properties, in turn, result in such desirable characteristics as lowered fuel consumption of vehicles using such tires.




In such contexts, the property of lowered hysteresis of compounded, vulcanizable elastomer compositions is particularly significant. Examples of such compounded elastomer systems are known to the art and are comprised of at least one elastomer (that is, a natural or synthetic polymer exhibiting elastomeric properties, such as a rubber), a reinforcing filler agent (such as finely divided carbon black, thermal black, or mineral fillers such as clay and the like) and a vulcanizing system such as sulfur-containing vulcanizing (that is, curing) system.




Previous attempts at preparing reduced hysteresis products have focused upon increased interaction between the elastomer and the compounding materials such as carbon black, including high temperature mixing of the filler-rubber mixtures in the presence of selectively-reactive promoters to promote compounding material reinforcement, surface oxidation of the compounding materials, chemical modifications to the terminal end of polymers using tetramethyldiaminobenzophenone (Michler's ketone), tin coupling agents and the like and, surface grafting.




It has also been recognized that carbon black, employed as a reinforcing filler in rubber compounds, should be well dispersed throughout the rubber in order to improve various physical properties. One example of the recognition is provided in published European Pat. Appln. EP 0 316 255 A2 which discloses a process for end capping polydienes by reacting a metal terminated polydiene with a capping agent such as a halogenated nitrile, a heterocyclic aromatic nitrogen-containing compound or an alkyl benzoate. Additionally, the application discloses that both ends of the polydiene chains can be capped with polar groups by utilizing functionalized initiators, such as lithium amides.




Various organolithium polymerization initiators are also known in the art. U.S. Pat. No. 3,439,049, owned by the Assignee of record, discloses an organolithium initiator prepared from a halophenol in a hydrocarbon medium.




Precipitated silica has been increasingly used as a reinforcing particulate filler in carbon black-filled rubber components of tires and mechanical goods. Silica-loaded rubber stocks, however, exhibit relatively poor resilience, and thus, increased hysteresis.




The present invention provides terminators for anionic polymerization which become incorporated into the polymer chain, providing functional groups which greatly improve the interactions of the polymer with the surface of the silica filler, resulting in the reduction of hysteresis in the vulcanized compound.




It is known that alkoxyalkylsilanes can react with the surface hydroxyl groups of silica particles to liberate alcohol and form an Si—O—Si linkage with the surface. The alkyl group attached to the silicon can contain a functional group which can act as a bonding site for polymer to silica (


Langmuir


1993, 3513-17).




It is also known that cleavage of (alkyl)


4


Sn compounds by surface hydroxyls can lead to bonding of tin and residual hydrocarbon (polymer) substituents to the surface and hydrocarbon formation (


J. Amer Chem. Soc.


1993, 113, 722-9). This reaction should result in the cleavage of a tin coupled polymer to lower molecular weight fragments. Carbon—silicon bonds are not cleaved by this process under similar reaction conditions.




Silanes have been used to bond polymers to silica in polymer composites, while tin compounds have not been reported to have been so used.




SUMMARY OF INVENTION




It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide anionic polymerization terminators which improve the interaction of diene polymer elastomers with silica filler surfaces.




It is another object of the present invention to provide a method for reducing the hysteresis of silica-filled elastomeric vulcanizable compounds.




It is another object of the present invention to provide a method for reducing the viscosity of silica-filled elastomeric vulcanizable compounds.




It is another object of the present invention to provide a method for enhancing the processability of silica-filled elastomeric vulcanizable compounds.




It is another object of the present invention to provide vulcanizable silica-filled elastomeric compounds which, upon vulcanization, exhibit reduced hysteresis.




It is still another object of the present invention to provide an improved pneumatic tire having decreased rolling resistance.




The foregoing objects, together with the advantages thereof over the existing art, which shall become apparent from the specification which follows, are accomplished by the invention as hereinafter described and claimed.




The present invention provides a process for the production of a diene-based elastomeric composition exhibiting reduced hysteresis properties when compounded with silica filler and vulcanized, the process comprising: mixing diene monomer and optionally monovinyl aromatic monomer or a triene with an initiator, and a coordinator; effecting polymerization conditions; terminating polymerization with an organo-tin terminator to form a tin-coupled diene elastomer; compounding the tin-coupled diene elastomer with an amorphous silica filler, and a vulcanization agent; and, effecting vulcanization of the silica-filled, tin-coupled diene elastomer composition.




The present invention further provides a vulcanizable silica-filled compound comprising a diene elastomer containing an organo-tin functionality derived from a terminator selected from the group consisting of tin tetrachloride, (R


1


)


2


SnCl


2


, R


1


SnCl


3


, (R


1


)


2


Sn(OR


1


)


2


, R


1


Sn(OR


1


)


3


, Sn(OR


1


)


4


, dialkyldioxastannylanes of the formula











wherein a is 2 or 3, and mixtures thereof, wherein each R


1


is independently C1 to about C8 aliphatic, about C6 to about C12 cyclo-aliphatic, or about C6 to about C18 aromatic, a silica filler, and a vulcanization agent. Optionally, the elastomer is a copolymer of at least one diene and at least one monovinyl aromatic monomer, and may contain a carbon black filler. The compound is more readily processable due to cleavage of tin—carbon bonds during mixing.




The present invention provides a pneumatic tire having tread stock vulcanized from the inventive vulcanizable silica-filled compound, having decreased rolling resistance.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a graph which plots compound Mooney Viscosity (ML


4


) at 100° C. versus gum Mooney Viscosity; and





FIG. 2

is a graph which plots minimum torque (ML) versus gum Mooney Viscosity (ML


4


).











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




In general, the present invention provides a means to enhance interaction of elastomeric polymers with silica filler to reduce hysteresis, namely the use of organotin modifiers for organolithium polymerization terminators. The present invention further provides a means to cleave tin coupled polymer chains in silica- and mixed carbon black/silica-filled formulations so that compound viscosity is reduced for better processing.




According to the present invention, an organolithium initiator, preferably an alkyllithium initiator is employed to prepare a narrow molecular weight distribution, anionically-polymerized elastomer, e.g., polybutadiene, polyisoprene and the like, and copolymers thereof with monovinyl aromatics such as styrene, alpha methyl styrene and the like, or trienes such as myrcene. Thus, the elastomers include diene homopolymers, A, and copolymers thereof with monovinyl aromatic polymers, B. Exemplary diene homopolymers are those prepared from diolefin monomers having from 4 to about 12 carbon atoms. Exemplary vinyl aromatic polymers are those prepared from monomers having from 8 to about 20 carbon atoms. Examples of conjugated diene monomers and the like useful in the present invention include 1,3-butadiene, isoprene, 1,3-pentadiene, 2,3-dimethyl-1,3-butadiene and 1,3-hexadiene, and aromatic vinyl monomers include styrene, β-methylstyrene, p-methylstyrene, vinyltoluenes and vinylnaphtalenes. The conjugated diene monomer and aromatic vinyl monomer are normally used at the weight ratios of about 90:10 to about 55:45, preferably about 80:20 to about 65:35.




Preferred elastomers include diene homopolymers such as polybutadiene and polyisoprene and copolymers such as styrene butadiene rubber (SBR). Copolymers can comprise from about 99 to 55 percent by weight of diene units and from about 1 to about 45 percent by weight of monovinyl aromatic or triene units, totalling 100 percent. The polymers and copolymers of the present invention may have the diene portion with a 1,2-microstructure contents ranging from about 10 to about 80 percent, with the preferred polymers or copolymers having 1,2-microstructure contents of from about 25 to about 65 percent. The molecular weight of the polymer that is produced according to the present invention, is preferably such that a proton-quenched sample will exhibit a gum Mooney viscosity (ML


4


/212° F.) of from about 2 to about 150. The copolymers are preferably random copolymers which result from simultaneous copolymerization of the monomers, as is known in the art.




The initiators used in the present invention include organolithium compounds such as n-butyllithium, tributyltin lithium, as well as lithium imide compounds wherein the lithium atom is directly bonded to the nitrogen of a secondary amine or (lithium-hydrocarbyl) substituted amine wherein the lithium atom is directly bonded to a carbon which is part of a hydrocarbyl group which, in turn, is bonded to a nitrogen. Representative of the former (i.e., lithium bonded to nitrogen) are aminolithium compounds of the structural formula R′


2


N—Li, and of the latter (i.e., lithium bonded to a carbon), compounds of the structural formula R′


2


N—R′—Li, wherein each R′ in either formula is a monovalent hydrocarbyl group, preferably having 1 to 12 carbons and more preferably having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, and R″ is a divalent hydrocarbyl group, preferably having 2 to 20 carbons. More particularly, the R′ in either of the formulas may be a C


1-12


hydrocarbyl group, such as, for instance, a C


1-12


alkyl group. In the latter formulas, it will be appreciated that the lithium atom is preferably not bonded to a carbon which is directly bonded to the amine nitrogen, but rather, is separated by at lest one, and more preferably, at least 3 carbon atoms. Further examples of these compounds include the dialkylaminolithium compounds such as dimethylaminolithium, diethylaminolithium, dipropylaminolithium, dibutylaminolithium and the like, dialkylaminoalkyllithium compounds such as diethylaminopropyllithium and the like, and trialkyl stanyl lithium, wherein the alkyl group contains 1 to about 12 carbon atoms, preferably 1 to about 4 carbon atoms.




Polymerization is usually conducted in a conventional solvent for anionic polymerizations such as the various cyclic and acyclic hexanes, heptanes, octanes, pentanes, their alkylated derivatives, and mixtures thereof, as well as aromatic solvents such as benzene, t-butylbenzene, toluene and the like. Other techniques for polymerization, such as semi-batch and continuous polymerization may be employed. In order to promote randomization in copolymerization and to increase vinyl content, a coordinator may optionally be added to the polymerization ingredients. Amounts range between 0 to 90 or more equivalents per equivalent of lithium. The amount depends upon the amount of vinyl desired, the level of styrene employed and the temperature of the polymerizations, as well as the nature of the specific polar coordinator employed.




Compounds useful as coordinators are organic and include those having an oxygen or nitrogen hetero-atom and a non-bonded pair of electrons. Examples include dialkyl ethers of mono and oligo alkylene glycols; “crown” ethers; tertiary amines such as tetramethylethylene diamine (TMEDA); THF; THF oligomers; linear and cyclic oligomeric oxolanyl alkanes, such as 2-2′-di(tetrahydrofuryl) propane, di-piperidyl ethane, hexamethylphosphoramide, N-N′-dimethylpiperazine, diazabicyclooctane, diethyl ether, tributylamine and the like. Details of linear and cyclic oligomeric oxolanyl coordinators can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,429,091, owned by the Assignee of record, the subject matter of which is incorporated herein by reference.




Polymerization is usually begun by charging a blend of the monomer(s) and solvent to a suitable reaction vessel, followed by the addition of the coordinator and the initiator. Alternatively, the monomer and coordinator can be added to the initiator. The procedure is carried out under anhydrous, anaerobic conditions. The reactants are heated to a temperature of from about 10° to about 150° C. and are agitated for about 0.1 to 24 hours. After polymerization is complete, the product is removed from the heat and terminated in one or more ways.




To terminate the polymerization, the terminating agents according to the present invention are employed, also known as coupling agents or linking agents, all of these agents being collectively referred to herein as “terminating agents”.




Terminating agents may provide the resulting polymer with a multifunctionality. That is, the polymers initiated according to the present invention, may carry at least one amine functional group and may also carry a second functional group selected and derived from the group consisting of terminating agents, coupling agents and linking agents.




Examples of terminating agents according to the present invention include tin tetrachloride, (R


1


)


2


SnCl


2


, R


1


SnCl


3


, (R


1


)


2


Sn(OR


1


)


2


, R


1


Sn(OR


1


)


3


, Sn(Or


1


)


4


, and dialkyldioxastannylanes of the formula











and the like, wherein a is 2 or 3, and wherein R


1


is C1 to about C18 aliphatic, about C6 to about C12 cyclo-aliphatic, or about C6 to about C18 aromatic, preferably C1 to about C10 aliphatic, about C6 to about C10 cycloaliphatic, or about C6 to about C12 aromatic.




The terminating agent is added to the reaction vessel, and the vessel is agitated for about 1 to about 1000 minutes. As a result, an elastomer is produced having an even greater affinity for silica compounding materials, and hence, even further reduced hysteresis.




Quenching is usually conducted by stirring the polymer and quenching agent for about 0.05 to about 2 hours at temperatures of from about 30° to 120° C. to ensure complete reaction. Polymers terminated with a functional group as discussed hereinabove, are subsequently quenched with alcohol or other quenching agent as described hereinabove.




Lastly, the solvent is removed from the polymer by conventional techniques such as drum drying, extruder drying, vacuum drying or the like, which may be combined with coagulation with water, alcohol or steam, thermal desolventization, or any other suitable method. If coagulation with water or steam is used, oven drying may be desirable.




The polymers of the present invention contain a functional group at both the head of the polymer chain and at the terminal end of the chain. These functional groups have an affinity for silica.




Sn—O—Si coupling of the elastomer to the silica filler according to the present invention is the result of cleavage of carbon-Sn bonds on mixing, with subsequent reduction of the compound viscosity allowing for better processing and mixing.




Such compounding further results in products exhibiting reduced hysteresis, which means a product having increased rebound, decreased rolling resistance and has lessened heat build-up when subjected to mechanical stress. Products including tires, power belts and the like are envisioned. Decreased rolling resistance is, of course, a useful property for pneumatic tires, both radial as well as bias ply types and thus, the vulcanizable elastomeric compositions of the present invention can be utilized to form treadstocks for such tires.




The polymers of the present invention can be utilized as 100 parts of the rubber in the treadstock compound or, they can be blended with any conventionally employed treadstock rubber which includes natural rubber, synthetic rubber and blends thereof. Such rubbers are well known to those skilled in the art and include synthetic polyisoprene rubber, styrene/butadiene rubber (SBR), polybutadiene, butyl rubber, Neoprene, ethylene/propylene rubber, ethylene/propylene/diene rubber (EPDM), acrylonitrile/butadiene rubber (NBR), silicone rubber, the fluoroelastomers, ethylene acrylic rubber, ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA), epichlorohydrin rubbers, chlorinated polyethylene rubbers, chlorosulfonated polyethylene rubbers, hydrogenated nitrile rubber, tetrafluoroethylene/propylene rubber and the like. When the polymers of the present invention are blended with conventional rubbers, the amounts can vary widely with a range comprising about 10 to about 99 percent by weight of the total rubber. It is to be appreciated that the minimum amount will depend primarily upon the degree of reduced hysteresis that is desired.




According to the present invention, amorphous silica (silicon dioxide) is utilized as a filler for the diene polymer or copolymer elastomer-containing vulcanizable compound. Silicas are generally classed as wet-process, hydrated silicas because they are produced by a chemical reaction in water, from which they are precipitated as ultrafine, spherical particles.




These primary particles strongly associate into aggregates, which in turn combine less strongly into agglomerates. The surface area, as measured by the BET method gives the best measure of the reinforcing character of different silicas. For silicas of interest for the present invention, the surface area should be about 32 to about 400 m


2


/g, with the range of about 100 to about 250 m


2


/g being preferred, and the range of about 150 to about 220 m


2


/g being most preferred. The pH of the silica filler is generally about 5.5 to about 7 or slightly over, preferably about 5.5 to about 6.8.




Silica can be employed in the amount of about 1 part to about 100 parts per 100 parts of polymer (phr), preferably in an amount from about 5 to about 80 phr. The useful upper range is limited by the high viscosity imparted by fillers of this type. Some of the commercially available silicas which may be used include: Hi-Sil® 190, Hi Sil®215, Hi-Sil® 233, produced by PPG Industries. Also, a number of useful commercial grades of different silicas are available from DeGussa Corporation, Rhone Poulenc, and J. M. Huber Corporation.




The polymers can also be compounded with all forms of carbon black in amounts ranging from about 0 to about 50 parts by weight, per 100 parts of rubber (phr), with less than about 10 phr being preferred. The carbon blacks may include any of the commonly available, commercially-produced carbon blacks but those having a surface area (EMSA) of at least 20 m


2


/gram and more preferably at least 35 m


2


/gram up to 200 m


2


/gram or higher are preferred. Surface area values used in this application are those determined by ASTM test D-1765 using the cetyltrimethyl-ammonium bromide (CTAB) technique. Among the useful carbon blacks are furnace black, channel blacks and lamp blacks. More specifically, examples of the carbon blacks include super abrasion furnace (SAF) blacks, high abrasion furnace (HAF) blacks, fast extrusion furnace (FEF) blacks, fine furnace (FF) blacks, intermediate super abrasion furnace (ISAF) blacks, semi- reinforcing furnace (SRF) blacks, medium processing channel blacks, hard processing channel blacks and conducting channel blacks. Other carbon blacks which may be utilized include acetylene blacks. Mixtures of two or more of the above blacks can be used in preparing the carbon black products of the invention. Typical values for surface areas of usable carbon blacks are summarized in TABLE I hereinbelow.












TABLE I











Carbon Blacks














ASTM Designation




Surface Area (m


2


/g)







(D-1765-82a)




(D-3765)


















N-110




126







N-220




111







N-339




95







N-330




83







N-351




74







N-550




42







N-660




35















The carbon blacks utilized in the preparation of the rubber compounds of the invention may be in pelletized form or an unpelletized flocculent mass. Preferably, for more uniform mixing, unpelletized carbon black is preferred.




The reinforced rubber compounds can be cured in a conventional manner with known vulcanizing agents at about 0.2 to about 5 phr. For example, sulfur or peroxide-based curing systems may be employed. For a general disclosure of suitable vulcanizing agents one can refer to Kirk-Othmer,


Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology,


3rd ed., Wiley Interscience, N.Y. 1982, Vol. 20, pp. 365-468, particularly “Vulcanization Agents and Auxiliary Materials” pp. 390-402. Vulcanizing agents can be used alone or in combination.




Vulcanizable elastomeric compositions of the invention can be prepared by compounding or mixing the functionalized polymers herein with carbon black, silica, and other conventional rubber additives including for example, fillers, plasticizers, antioxidants, curing agents and the like using standard rubber mixing equipment and procedures. Such elastomeric compositions when vulcanized using conventional rubber vulcanization conditions have reduced hysteresis properties and are particularly adapted for use as tread rubbers for tires having reduced rolling resistance.




GENERAL EXPERIMENTAL




EXAMPLE NOS. 1-10 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES A-G




In order to demonstrate the preparation and properties of elastomeric compositions prepared according to the present invention, styrene butadiene polymers were prepared with n−BuLi modified initiation and coupled with R(n)SnX(4−n) or R(n)SiX(4−n) where n is an integer 0, 1 or 2, or mixtures thereof. The molar ratio of coupling agent to active lithium and the properties of the polymers prepared are shown below in Table II. Coupling of narrow distribution polymers prepared by alkyllithium initiation aids in the isolation and drying of the polymer by conventional rubber drying equipment through increasing the molecular weight and molecular weight distribution and reducing polymer stickiness and cold flow. As noted above, various techniques known in the art for carrying out polymerizations may be used with these terminators without departing from the scope of the present invention.




In the Tables, “C” used in conjunction with the example number denotes “Control” or the measurements taken before termination, while “T” used in conjunction with the example number denotes the measurements taken after termination.























TABLE II










Molar Ratio








%




%




% Blk




% 1,2





T


g








Ex. No




Terminator/Li




Terminator




ML


4






M


n






M


w


/M


n






Coupling




Styrene




Styrene




(Bd = 100)




DSV




(−° C.)


































1C






10.4




107000




1.04




2.3




27.5




5.4




54.0




0.97




33.2






1T




1:1




Sn




66.8




251000




1.27




81.0




27.5




5.5




53.9




1.85




33.6








(—O-t-Butyl)


4








2C






9.9




110000




1.04




2.5




27.5




4.4




48.7




0.96




37.0






2T




0.25:1  




SnCl


4






77.8




262000




1.26




84.1




28.6




4.7




48.6




1.87




37.4






3C






8.3




 97000




1.04




2.2




27.3




4.4




53.5




0.94




34.4






3T




1:1




SnCl


4






38.8




139000




1.61




43.0




27.5




5.1




53.2




1.30




34.9






Comp AC






12.0




118000




1.03




1.7




27.5




5.4




54.2




1.01




32.5






Comp AT




0.25:1  




SiCl


4






76.6




273000




1.30




68.5




28.8




5.2




52.9




1.84




33.4






Comp BC






10.2




105000




1.05




2.3




26.2




4.3




53.7




0.98




35.0






Comp BT




1:1




SiCl


4






90.1




311000




1.15




95.4




26.3




4.1




51.8




2.04




36.4






4C






11.1




115000




1.03




1.2




27.7




5.8




54.5




1.02




34.3






4T




1:1




BuSn




81.2




226000




1.21




76.8




27.5




5.2




53.4




1.71




34.5








(—O-t-Amyl)


3








5C






7.8





1.05




2.9




27.1




4.5




53.0




0.93




35.0






5T




0.33:1  




BuSnCl


3






81.6




233000




1.11




95




28.5




5.4




52.7




1.73




34.1






6C






12.7




114000




1.04




2.8




26.8




4.9




53.2




1.05




35.5






6T




1:1




BuSnCl


3






75.0




232000




1.19




81.3




26.9




4.5




52.3




1.71




35.7






Comp CC






8.0




102000




1.04





26.0




4.7




52.7




0.95




36.1






Comp CT




0.33:1  




CH


3


SiCl


3






85.0




258000




1.08




91.2




27.3




5.1




52.1




1.74




35.2






Comp DC






19.1




131000




1.05





27.0




5.3




55.8




1.12




33.2






Comp DT




1:1




CH


3


SiCl


3






103.7




294000




1.12




91.3




27.2




5.3




55.5




2.07




33.1






7C






9.0




111000




1.04




2.1




27.0




5.4




53.5




0.99




32.7






7T




1:1




Bu


2


Sn




55.5




173000




1.13




69.2




27.2




5.2




53.6




1.46




34.4








(—O-t-Amyl)


2








8C






31.8




152000




1.04




2.4




28.7




6.7




58.7




1.24




28.2






8T




1:1




Dioxastannalane




104.4




265000




1.09




84.6




28.7




6.7




58.1




1.99




28.8






9C






9.4




105000




1.04




2.5




27.1




5.0




52.7




0.97




36.0






9T




0.5:1  




Bu


2


SnCl


2






77.4




206000




1.06




95




28.8




5.0




50.5




1.60




35.6






10C






9.1




107000




1.04




2.3




26.5




4.1




51.4




0.98




36.7






10T




1:1




Bu


2


SnCl


2






68.0




202000




1.04




95.9




26.9




4.6




50.5




1.57




36.4






Comp EC






11.0




112000




1.03





26.6




4.6




53.2




1.02




35.6






Comp ET




0.5:1  




(CH


3


)


2


SiCl


2






64.9




188000




1.11




72.0




27.4




4.8




52.0




1.54




34.3






Comp FC






11.9




116000




1.04





26.7




4.4




52.0




1.05




35.3






Comp FT




1:1




(CH


3


)


2


SiCl


2






82.6




210000




1.08




87.2




27.3




4.9




51.9




1.64




34.8






Comp GC





No Terminator




42.5




163000




1.07




2.7




26.1




3.8




48.2




1.44




39.5











Dioxastannalane = Bu


2


Sn(—O—CH(ET)CH(ME)CH


2


—O—)













EXAMPLE NOS. 11-20, AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES H-N




The polymers prepared above were compounded in the following high silica formulation with a control polymer coupled with methyltriphenoxysilane.












TABLE III











Silica Formulations














Ingredient




Amount (parts per 100 parts polymer)


















Polymer




100







Silica




40







Carbon Black




8







Si-69




1







DCHA




1







Stearic Acid




2







Sulfur




1.4







Accelerators




2.4







Zinc Oxide




3







Total




159.8













Si-69 and DCHA are processing aids.













The compound and cured properties for these high silica formulations of the tin and silicon-coupled polymer compositions are presented in Tables IV and V, respectively.















TABLE IV











Example




Control*




11C




11T









Polymer from Ex.




**




1C




1T






Gum ML


4






42.0




10.4




66.8






Mixing (70 rpm)




8:00




9:00




2:35






Time (min)






Cpd ML


4


100° C.




96.4




42.7




96.6






ML




7.6




2.7




8.09






MH




40.27




43.11




49.11






Shore A




64




73




74






Pendulum




71.2




55.8




61.0






Rebound 65° C.






Ring Tensile @ 24° C.






100% Mod (psi)




542




586




537






Max Stress (psi)




1946




1857




1890






Max Strain (%)




260




299.7




294.8






Ring Tensile @ 100° C.






100% Mod (psi)




467




418




403






Max Stress (psi)




1116




1065




1203






Max Strain (%)




187.4




230.1




252






Ring Tear 171° C.




82




130




189






(lb/in)






65° C. Tanδ (7%)




0.0690




0.1544




0.1332






65° C. G′




2.5103




6.8237




6.2568






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)






65° C. ΔG′




0.4173




3.9148




3.2356






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)






Wet Skid




44




46




45


















Example




12C




12T




13C




13T









Polymer from Ex.




2C




2T




3C




3T






Gum ML


4






9.9




77.8




8.3




38.8






Mixing (70 rpm)




9:00




3:20




10:00




8:30






Time (min)






Cpd ML


4


100° C.




45.7




103.9




37.1




66






ML




3.22




8.95




2.83




4.37






MH




38.01




44.2




43.0




41.71






Shore A




70




70




74




69






Pendulum




59.6




65.4




59.4




69.2






Rebound 65° C.






Ring Tensile @ 24° C.






100% Mod (psi)




467




444




490




567






Max Stress (psi)




1600




1989




1519




2435






Max Strain (%)




326.5




355.8




294.8




330.2






Ring Tensile @ 100° C.






100% Mod (psi)




351




356




424




423






Max Stress (psi)




1150




1258




1037




1266






Max Strain (%)




294.8




293.5




228.9




238






Ring Tear 171° C.




225




236




208




229






(lb/in)






65° C. Tanδ (7%)






65° C. G′




0.1827




0.1425




0.1804




0.1040.






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)




4.6614




4.7899




6.4380




2.9845






65° C. ΔG′






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)




2.4610




2.1762




3.7863




0.8863






Wet Skid




45




45




48




47









Example




14C




14T




15C




15T









Polymer from Ex.




4C




4T




5C




5T






Gum ML


4






11.1




81.2




7.8




81.6






Mixing (70 rpm)




9:00




3:45




9:00




3:25






Time (min)






Cpd ML


4


100° C.




51.1




100




37.2




110.3






ML




2.94




8.39




2.59




9.70






MH




42.62




47.67




42.33




47.18






Shore A




72




69




72




68






Pendulum




58.8




63.2




56.8




65.2






Rebound 65° C.






Ring Tensile @ 24° C.






100% Mod (psi)




565




564




573




497






Max Stress (psi)




1979




2012




1891




2321






Max Strain (%)




319.8




287.4




314.3




354






Ring Tensile @ 100° C.






100% Mod (psi)




409




433




447




434






Max Stress (psi)




970




1207




1080




1410






Max Strain (%)




214.2




230.7




231.9




265.5






Ring Tear 171° C.




126




136




205




200






(lb/in)






65° C. Tanδ (7%)




0.1482




0.1183




0.1757




0.1341






65° C. G′




5.6181




5.6024




7.6755




4.7822






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)






65° C. ΔG′




2.9627




2.6276




4.5172




2.2409






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)






Wet Skid




47




46




46




47









Example




16C




16T




17C




17T









Polymer from Ex.




6C




6T




7C




7T






Gum ML


4






12.7




75




9.0




55.5






Mixing (70 rpm)




8:00




4:00




9:00




3:20






Time (min)






Cpd ML


4


100° C.




55.3




107.2




46.3




96.9






ML




3.36




9.41




3.04




6.92






MH




44.49




46.55




43.46




48.80






Shore A




74




70




73




73






Pendulum




58.8




65




58




63.4






Rebound 65° C.






Ring Tensile @ 24° C.






100% Mod (psi)




571




553




559




581






Max Stress (psi)




1839




2291




1883




1982






Max Strain (%)




314.3




321.6




317.3




291.1






Ring Tensile @ 100° C.






100% Mod (psi)




469




428




413




442






Max Stress (psi)




988




1143




978




1062






Max Strain (%)




212.4




228.9




218.5




209.9






Ring Tear 171° C.




154




157




142




140






(lb/in)






65° C. Tanδ (7%)




0.1396




0.1036




0.1475




0.1219






65° C. G′




9.9941




4.8918




6.235




6.3746






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)






65° C. ΔG′




6.8434




1.9762




3.4199




3.2375






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)






Wet Skid




44




45




47




46









Example




18C




18T




19C




19T









Polymer from Ex.




8C




8T




9C




9T






Gum ML


4






32.9




104.7




9.4




77.4






Mixing (70 rpm)




4:50




3:55




9:00




4:15






Time (min)






Cpd ML


4


100° C.




89.5




140




42.6




114






ML




5.93




12.16




2.88




8.25






MH




48.41




50.27




43.19




47.27






Shore A




76




72




74




72






Pendulum




57.4




64




59.2




66






Rebound 65° C.






Ring Tensile @ 24° C.






100% Mod (psi)




678




537




601




541






Max Stress (psi)




2362




2227




2105




2241






Max Strain (%)




302.7




306.4




328.3




327.1






Ring Tensile @ 100° C.






100% Mod (psi)




486




409




491




466






Max Stress (psi)




1158




1096




1038




1299






Max Strain (%)




208.1




215.4




200.2




234.4






Ring Tear 171° C.




128




113




206




191






(lb/in)






65° C. Tanδ (7%)




0.1447




0.1099




0.158




0.124






65° C. G′




7.1809




5.9496




6.1124




5.4797






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)






65° C. ΔG′




4.0888




2.8411




3.2406




2.5985






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)






Wet Skid




47




46




47




46

















Example




20C




20T




H









Polymer from Ex.




10C




10T




GC






Gum ML


4






9.1




68.0




42.5






Mixing (70 rpm)




8:00




4:00




5:00






Time (min)






Cpd ML


4


100° C.




43.6




111.6




110.5






ML




2.40




7.49




8.30






MH




43.24




47.42




48.28






Shore A




74




73




72






Pendulum




58.4




65




67.8






Rebound 65° C.






Ring Tensile @ 24° C.






100% Mod (psi)




590




595




501






Max Stress (psi)




1667




2025




2146






Max Strain (%)




285.6




303.9




346






Ring Tensile @ 100° C.






100% Mod (psi)




493




486




464






Max Stress (psi)




825




967




1319






Max Strain (%)




175.2




192.2




250.2






Ring Tear 171° C.




153




134




176






(lb/in)






65° C. Tanδ (7%)




0.1427




0.1087




0.1177






65° C. G′




6.7624




5.7533




5.5921






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)






65° C. ΔG′




3.7138




2.5195




2.6384






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)






Wet Skid




44




44




46











*Additive = MeSi(OPh)


3












**Terminated with (—OPh)Si





























TABLE V











Example




Control




I-C




I-T




J-C




J-T




K-C




K-T




H









Gum ML


4






42.0




12.0




76.7




10.2




90.1




8.0




85.2




42.5






Mixing (70 rpm)




8:00




9:00




3:00




10:00




4:00




9:00




2:35




5:00






Time (min)






Cpd ML


4


100° C.




96.4




52.6




143.2




45.5




153.2




40.5




138.8




110.5






ML




7.6




3.12




18.14




3.31




22.6




2.93




21.07




8.30






MH




40.27




38.25




48:28




42.95




49.67




42.91




52.79




48.28






Shore A




64




71




74




70




73




73




74




72






Pend. Rebound




71.2




60.5




65.6




61.8




72




59.8




66.8




67.8






65° C.






Ring Tensile @ 24° C.






100% Mod (psi)




542




492




482




540




596




552




571




501






Max Stress (psi)




1946




1828




1981




1925




2513




1881




2406




2146






Max Strain (%)




260




336.3




318.0




321.6




289.9




318




329.6




346.0






Ring Tensile @ 100° C.






100% Mod (psi)




467




340




442




475




544




437




494




464






Max Stress (psi)




1116




1046




1371




1084




1773




874




1303




1319






Max Strain (%)




187




268




260




213




241




193




228




250






Ring Tear 171° C.




82




242




218




200




117




215




152




176






(lb/in)






65° C. Tanδ (7%)




0.0690




0.1622




0.1439




0.1582




0.1084




0.1748




0.1389




0.1177






65° C. G′




2.5103




4.972




6.4684




5.9731




5.5394




6.3189




7.0029




5.5921






(dynes/sq






cm × 10


−7


)






65° C. ΔG′




0.4173




2.5448




3.4362




3.3037




2.4024




3.6587




3.7746




2.6384






(dynes/sq






cm × 10


−7


)






Wet Skid




44




47




47




48




47




47




45




46





















Example




L-C




L-C




M-C




M-T




N-C




N-T




H









Polymer from




D-C




D-T




E-C




E-T




F-C




F-T




G






Ex.






Gum ML


4






19.1




103.7




11.0




64.9




11.9




82.6




42.5






Mixing (70 rpm)




7:00




2:35




9:00




4:00




9:00




4:00




5:00






Time (min)






Cpd ML


4


100° C.




70.8




155.9




54.2




134.8




56.3




138.5




110.5






ML




4.75




21.79




3.41




10.89




3.46




13.44




8.30






MH




44.92




52.07




42.76




48.95




42.04




50.10




48.28






Shore A




68




72




73




74




73




70




72






Pend.




64




68.2




59




63.6




59.6




65.2




67.8






Rebound






65° C.






Ring Tensile @ 24° C.






100% Mod (psi)




512




515




525




545




534




506




501






Max Stress (psi)




2064




2431




1947




2460




1962




2289




2146






Max Strain (%)




339.3




332.6




333.2




360.1




329.6




35




346.0






Ring Tensile @ 100° C.






100% Mod (psi)




449




466




472




507




489




481




464






Max Stress (psi)




1073




1370




1141




1641




1238




1286




1319






Max Strain (%)




210




237




228




274




236




228




250






Ring Tear




189




148




191




137




175




127




176






171° C. (lb/in)






65° C. Tanδ




0.1529




0.1270




0.1437




0.1212




0.1300




0.122




0.1177






(7%)






65° C. G′




5.303




7.2911




5.7372




6.3407




5.1064




6.9139




5.5921






(dynes/sq cm ×






10


−7


)






65° C. ΔG′




2.8111




3.8403




2.9548




3.2143




2.3348




3.6410




2.6384






(dynes/sq






cm ×






10


−7


)






Wet Skid




47




47




47




45




46




47




46











Additive = MeSi(OPh)


3















As demonstrated by the plot of compound Mooney viscosity (ML


4


) at 100° C. versus gum ML


4


, all of the tin coupled polymers, regardless of the stoichiometry or the nature of X, have lower compound ML


4


s than their silicon-coupled analogues or that would be predicted by the general trend, shown in FIG.


1


. Similarly, the minimum torque (ML), as measured by Monsanto Rheometer, is lower for the tin compound coupling compared to silicon coupling, FIG.


2


.




Both the ML


4


and ML values of the tin coupled polymers, which are lower than expected for the gum ML


4


s of the raw polymers, indicate polymers that are more easily processable in rubber mixing and extruding equipment than the silicon-coupled counterparts.




Despite the apparent cleavage of the tin coupled polymers on mixing in the above high silica formulation, the tensile and dynamic properties of these materials are not significantly affected when compared to the uncleaved silicon-coupled polymers, reported in Tables IV (tin-coupled) and V (silicon-coupled).




EXAMPLE NOS. 21-34 AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES O-R




The coupled elastomeric polymers prepared above were also compounded in a 50/50 carbon black/silica formulation as described below, with or without the processing aids (PA) dicyclohexylamine and Si-69.












TABLE VI











Screening Formulation with 50CB/50 Silica
















Amount (with




Amount (without







Ingredient




Processing Aids)




Processing Aids)



















Polymer




100




100







Silica




23.4




23.4







Carbon Black




23.4




23.4







Si-69




0.5




0







DCHA




0.5




0







Antioxidant




1




1







Stearic Acid




2




2







Sulfur




1.4




1.4







Accelerators




2.4




2.4







Zinc Oxide




3




3







Total




157.6




156.6















Si69 and DCHA=Process Aids




The filler was added in portions with either the carbon black or silica first. The first group of six tin-coupled polymers was mixed with the Carbon Black portion of the filler first, and the second group of tin-coupled polymers were mixed with the silica first. The third group of polymers, the silicon-coupled control polymers, were mixed only with the carbon black first. Two mixes were prepared with each polymer in each group. The first mix in each case contained the processing aids (PA) as described above. Test data from these samples are presented in Table VII.












TABLE VII











Carbon Black mixed first

















Example




21




22




23




24




25




26









Polymer from Ex.




2T




2T




5T




5T




9T




9T






Processing Aid




PA




No




PA




No




PA




No






ML




4.27




5.57




4.70




6.19




4.27




4.99






MH




40.12




41.18




40.31




42.14




40.31




41.47






Ring Tensile @ 24° C.






100% Mod (psi)




397




452




473




378




544




385






Max Stress (psi)




1699




1551




1527




1283




1848




1203






Max Strain (%)




305




302




246




288




270




271






Ring Tensile @ 100° C.






100% Mod (psi)




388




322




365




285




330




298






Max Stress (psi)




878




896




832




882




864




842






Max Strain (%)




195




255




190




261




209




245






65° C.




0.0896




0.1080




0.0918




0.1166




0.0937




0.1130






Tanδ (7%)






65° C. G′




2.8663




3.5918




2.9081




4.2332




2.973




3.7034






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)






65° C. ΔG′




0.6638




1.1552




0.7146




1.6425




0.8210




1.3596






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)














Silica Filler mixed first

















Example




27




28




29




30




31




32









Polymer from Ex.




2T




2T




5T




5T




9T




9T






Processing Aid




PA




No




PA




No




PA




No






ML




4.08




4.66




4.61




5.38




4.42




5.33






MH




38.97




40.17




38.68




39.98




39.45




40.89






Ring Tensile @ 24° C.






100% Mod (psi)




552




394




524




449




501




440






Max Stress (psi)




2198




1663




2141




1809




1724




1914






Max Strain (%)




307




334




303




320




267




321






Ring Tensile @ 100° C.






100% Mod (psi)




379




296




371




292




405




160






Max Stress (psi)




1012




890




929




852




993




553






Max Strain (psi)




212




261




201




246




202




272






65° C.




0.0914




0.1068




0.0861




0.1042




0.0802




0.0983






Tanδ 7%






65° C. G′




2.5034




2.8631




2.5706




3.1576




2.5445




3.1999






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)






65° C. ΔG′




0.5319




0.7882




0.4841




0.9227




0.4398




0.9355






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)














Carbon Black mixed first

















Example




O




P




33




34




Q




R









Polymer from Ex.




A-T




A-T




10T




10T




E-T




E-T






Processing Aid




PA




NO




PA




No




PA




No






ML




13.29




15.31




15.93




18.05




8.69




10.27






MH




43.67




44.78




44.63




45.11




44.23




44.35






Ring Tensile @ 24° C.






100% Mod (psi)




517




428




496




378




529




382






Max Stress (psi)




1615




1440




1543




1396




1699




1343






Max Strain (%)




246




281




251




298




270




303






Ring Tensile @ 100° C.






100% Mod (psi)




412




320




364




330




408




307






Max Stress (psi)




790




898




722




715




964




714






Max Strain (%)




167




239




177




203




212




217






65° C.




0.1062




0.1227




0.1082




0.1167




0.0900




0.1225






Tanδ (7%)






65° C. G′




4.0933




4.8684




4.1319




4.6017




3.4593




4.9708






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)






65° C. ΔG′




1.5395




2.2642




1.5178




2.0057




1.0515




2.4469






(dynes/sq cm × 10


−7


)














As demonstrated by the data in Table VII, tin-coupled polymers with gum ML


4


s and other properties essentially equivalent to the silicon coupled polymers give compounds with much lower ML's than the silicon-coupled polymers. At the same time, Tan δ's for the tin-coupled polymers are equivalent to or less than the silicon-coupled polymers, indicating equivalent or better hysteresis properties for the tin-coupled polymers. Tensile properties of the tin-coupled polymers are not adversely affected by the cleavage on mixing.




It is therefore demonstrated that the present invention provides a means to cause interaction of elastomeric polymers with silica filler to reduce hysteresis, and further provides a means to cleave tin coupled polymer chains in silica- and mixed carbon black/silica-filled formulations so that compound viscosity is reduced for better processing.




It should be appreciated that the present invention is not limited to the specific embodiments described above, but includes variations, modifications and equivalent embodiments defined by the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A vulcanizable silica-filled compound comprising a diene elastomer containing an organo-tin functionality derived from a terminator selected form the group consisting of tin tetrachloride, (R1)2SnCl2, R1SnCl3, (R1)2Sn(OR1)1, R1Sn(OR1)3, Sn(OR1)4, dialkyldioxastannylanes of the formula wherein a is 2 or 3 and mixtures thereof, wherein each R1 is independently C1 to about C8 aliphatic, about C6 about C12 cyclo-aliphatic, or about C6 to about C18 aromatic, a silica filler, and a vulcanization agent, wherein said silica-filled compound has a reduced viscosity compared to the viscosity of a control silica-filled compound comprising an equivalent diene elastomer containing an organo-silicon functionality derived form a silicon-based terminator.
  • 2. The vulcanizable silica-filled compound of claim 1 wherein the elastomer is selected from the group consisting of conjugated diene polymers and copolymers thereof prepared from monomers selected from the group consisting of monovinyl aromatic monomers and trienes.
  • 3. The vulcanizable silica-filled compound of claim 1 wherein each R1 is independently C1 to about C10 aliphatic, about C6 to about C10 cyclo-aliphatic, or about C6 to about C12 aromatic.
  • 4. The vulcanizable silica-filled compound of claim 1 wherein the silica filler has a surface area of about 32 to about 400 m2/g.
  • 5. The vulcanizable silica-filled compound of claim 1 wherein the silica filler has a pH of about 5.5 to about 7.
  • 6. The vulcanizable silica-filled compound of claim 1 further containing a carbon black filler.
  • 7. The vulcanizable silica-filled compound of claim 1 wherein silica is present in an amount of about 1 phr to about 100 phr.
  • 8. The vulcanizable silica-filled compound of claim 1 wherein silica is present in an amount of about 5 phr to about 80 phr.
  • 9. The vulcanizable silica-filled compound of claim 1 further containing a natural rubber.
  • 10. The vulcanizable silica-filled compound of claim 1, wherein the viscosity is expressed as the compound Mooney viscosity (ML4) at 100° C.
  • 11. The vulcanizable silica-filled compound of claim 1, wherein the viscosity is expressed as a rheometric measurement of the minimum torque (ML) of the compound.
  • 12. The vulcanizable silica-filled compound of claim 1, wherein the diene elastomer containing the organo-tin functionality has a gum viscosity and the equivalent diene elastomer containing the organo-silicon functionality has an equivalent gum viscosity, and the compound viscosity of the silica-filled compound comprising the elastomer containing the organo-tin functionality is less than the compound viscosity of the silica-filled compound comprising the elastomer containing the organo-silicon functionality.
US Referenced Citations (16)
Number Name Date Kind
3439049 Trepka Apr 1969
5268439 Hergenrother Dec 1993
5354822 Antkowiak Oct 1994
5393721 Kitamura Feb 1995
5502131 Antkowiak et al. Mar 1996
5508333 Shimizu Apr 1996
5514756 Hsu et al. May 1996
5521309 Antkowiak et al. May 1996
5552473 Lawson et al. Sep 1996
5574109 Lawson et al. Nov 1996
5610227 Antkowiak Mar 1997
5610237 Lawson et al. Mar 1997
5866650 Lawson et al. Feb 1999
5872171 Detrano Feb 1999
5872176 Hergenrother et al. Feb 1999
5916961 Hergenrother et al. Jun 1999
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2184932 Mar 1997 CA
0316 255 May 1988 EP
94106340 Apr 1994 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
“Reactions of Organstannanes with Silica, ≅-Alumina, and Silica-Alumina” Ballivet Tkatchenko et al. Langmuir vol. 9, No. 12, pp.3513-3517 Sep. 29, 1997.
“Surface Organoletallic Chemistry of Tin: Reactivity of Tetraalkyltin Complexes and Tributyltin Hydride Toward Silica” Nédez et al. American Chemical Society, vol. 115, No. 2, pp. 722-729, 1993.