The disclosure relates generally to an electric machine and, more particularly, to optimal configurations for an interior permanent magnet machine.
An electric machine such as an interior permanent magnet machine generally includes a rotor having a plurality of magnets of alternating polarity positioned near the outer periphery of the rotor. The rotor is rotatable within a stator assembly which generally includes a plurality of stator windings. The configuration of the stator assembly affects the torque output of the electric machine as well as the amount of undesirable torque ripple (resulting in vibration and noise) produced by the electric machine.
An electric machine includes a stator core defining a number of stator slots (Z). A rotor assembly is positioned at least partially within the stator core. The rotor assembly includes at least one permanent magnet and defines a number of poles (M). A plurality of stator windings are positioned in the number of stator slots (Z) and define a number of phases (M). Optimal configurations for the electric machine are specified that maximize torque while minimizing torque ripple, noise and manufacturing complexity.
The machine defines a non-integer slots per pole per phase value (X), which is expressed as a mixed fraction in the form of A(B/C), where A, B and C are integers. The number of poles (P) may be greater than or equal to 12. The optimal configuration requires that the value of C may not be equal to the number of phases (M). The greatest common divisor (GCD) of the number of stator slots (Z) and the number of poles (P) is at least 6, where the GCD is defined as the largest positive integer that divides the number of stator slots (Z) and the number of poles (P) without a remainder.
In one embodiment, the slots per pole per phase value (X) is exactly 2½.In one example, the number of phases (M) is 3, the number of poles (P) is 12 and the number of stator slots (Z) is 90. In another example, the number of phases (M) is 3, the number of poles (P) is 14 and the number of stator slots (Z) is 105. In another example, the number of phases (M) is 3, the number of poles (P) is 16 and the number of stator slots (Z) is 120. In another example, the number of phases (M) is 3, the number of poles (P) is 18 and the number of stator slots (Z) is 135.
In another embodiment, the slots per pole per phase value (X) is exactly 3½. In one example, the number of phases (M) is 3, the number of poles (P) is 12 and the number of stator slots (Z) is 126. In another example, the number of phases (M) is 3, the number of poles (P) is 14 and the number of stator slots (Z) is 147. In another example, the number of phases (M) is 3, the number of poles (P) is 16 and the number of stator slots (Z) is 168.
In another embodiment, the slots per pole per phase value (X) is exactly 3½. In one example, the number of phases (M) is 3, the number of poles (P) is 14 and the number of stator slots (Z) is 63. In another example, the number of phases (M) is 3, the number of poles (P) is 16 and the number of stator slots (Z) is 72. In another example, the number of phases (M) is 3, the number of poles (P) is 18 and the number of stator slots (Z) is 81.
The plurality of stator windings may include at least five parallel paths per phase. The lowest common multiplier (LCM) of the number of stator slots (Z) and the number of poles (P) may be at least 72. The LCM is defined as a smallest positive integer that is divisible by both the number of stator slots (Z) and the number of poles (P).
The above features and advantages and other features and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best modes for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
Referring to the Figures, wherein like reference numbers refer to the same or similar components throughout the several views,
Referring to
The rotor assembly 14 includes a plurality of poles.
Referring to
Referring to
Each bar conductor 42 includes a crown portion 44, i.e., a “U” shaped end turn, and two leg portions, i.e., a first leg portion 46 and a second leg portion 48. The first and second leg portions 46, 48 extend from the crown portion 44 to a first bar end 50 and a second bar end 51, respectively. The first leg portion 46 and the second leg portion 48 of each bar conductor 42 are disposed within different stator slots 36 of the stator core 30. The U-shaped bar conductors are also referred to as “hairpin” conductors. It is understood that the bar conductor 42 shown in
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
An electric machine 10 may vary the system voltage and torque it produces by varying the number of turns in series per phase (N) in its design. For rectangular hairpin windings, N may be expressed as:
N=[P*X*W/n],
where P is the number of poles; X is the number of stator slots per pole per phase; W is the number of winding sets; and n is the number of parallel paths per phase. Typically the slots per pole per phase value (X) is an integer.
Referring to
Referring to
In the first optimal configuration 70, the lowest common multiplier (LCM) of the number of stator slots (Z) and the number of poles (P) is at least 72. The LCM is defined as the smallest positive integer that is divisible by both the number of stator slots (Z) and the number of poles (P). Requiring a minimum LCM of 72 reduces the amount of undesired clogging torque in the machine 10. As is known to those skilled in the art, clogging torque is a component of torque ripple.
In the first optimal configuration 70, since the slots per pole per phase value (X) is exactly 2½, the number of stator slots 36 found in the two poles 26 (or stator slots per pole pair) may be determined by the number of phases (M) in each winding set. For example, if the number of phases (M) is 3 in each winding set, the number of stator slots 36 found in the two poles 26 (i.e. the number of stator slots 36 per pole pair) is fifteen [number of stator slots per pole pair=2½ (slots per pole per phase)*3 phases*2 poles per pole pair]. As commonly understood, the asterisk * refers to multiplication. Thus the embodiment illustrated in
In one example, the number of phases (M) is 3 and the number of poles (P) is 12. In this case the total number of stator slots (Z) will be 90 (2½*3*12). This configuration results in the greatest common divisor (GCD) of the number of stator slots (Z=90) and the number of poles (P=12) being 6. This configuration results in the lowest common multiplier (LCM) of the number of stator slots (Z=90) and the number of poles (P=12) being 180.
In another example, the number of phases (M) is 3 and the number of poles (P) is 14. In this case the number of stator slots (Z) will be 105 (2½*3*14). This configuration results in the greatest common divisor (GCD) of the number of stator slots (Z=105) and the number of poles (P=14) being 7. This configuration results in the lowest common multiplier (LCM) of the number of stator slots (Z=105) and the number of poles (P=14) being 210.
In another example, the number of phases (M) is 3 and the number of poles (P) is 16. In this case the number of stator slots (Z) will be 120 (2½*3*16). This configuration results in the greatest common divisor (GCD) of the number of stator slots (Z=120) and the number of poles (P=16) being 8. This configuration results in the lowest common multiplier (LCM) of the number of stator slots (Z=120) and the number of poles (P=16) being 240.
In another example, the number of phases (M) is 3 and the number of poles (P) is 18. In this case the number of stator slots (Z) will be 135 (2½*3*18). This configuration results in the greatest common divisor (GCD) of the number of stator slots (Z=135) and the number of poles (P=18) being 9. This configuration results in the lowest common multiplier (LCM) of the number of stator slots (Z=135) and the number of poles (P=18) being 270.
Alternatively, the slots per pole per phase (X) may be set to be exactly 2½, with the number of phases (M) being set as 5. The number of poles (P) may be set to be 12. In this case the number of stator slots (Z) will be 150 (2½*5*12). This configuration results in the greatest common divisor (GCD) of the number of stator slots (Z=150) and the number of poles (P=12) being 6. This configuration results in the lowest common multiplier (LCM) of the number of stator slots (Z=150) and the number of poles (P=12) being 300.
Referring now to
Similar to the first optimal configuration 70, the value of C may not be equal to the number of phases (M) in the second optimal configuration 72 and the number of poles (P) may be greater than or equal to 12. Also similar to the first optimal configuration 70, the greatest common divisor (GCD) in the second optimal configuration 72, of the number of stator slots (Z) and the number of poles (P), is at least 6. The GCD is defined as the largest positive integer that divides the number of stator slots (Z) and the number of poles (p) without a remainder. In the second optimal configuration 72, the lowest common multiplier (LCM) of the number of stator slots (Z) and the number of poles (P) is at least 72.
In one example, the number of phases (M) is 3 and the number of poles (P) is 12. In this case the total number of stator slots (Z) will be 126 (3½*3*12). This configuration results in the greatest common divisor (GCD) of the number of stator slots (Z=126) and the number of poles (P=12) being 6. This configuration results in the lowest common multiplier (LCM) of the number of stator slots (Z=126) and the number of poles (P=12) being 252.
In another example, the number of phases (M) is 3 and the number of poles (P) is 14. In this case the number of stator slots (Z) will be 147 (3½*3*14). This configuration results in the greatest common divisor (GCD) of the number of stator slots (Z=147) and the number of poles (P=14) being 7. This configuration results in the lowest common multiplier (LCM) of the number of stator slots (Z=147) and the number of poles (P=14) being 294.
In another example, the number of phases (M) is 3 and the number of poles (P) is 16. In this case the number of stator slots (Z) will be 168 (3½*3*16). This configuration results in the greatest common divisor (GCD) of the number of stator slots (Z=168) and the number of poles (P=16) being 8. This configuration results in the lowest common multiplier (LCM) of the number of stator slots (Z=168) and the number of poles (P=16) being 336.
Alternatively, the slots per pole per phase (X) may be set to be exactly 3½, with the number of phases (M) being set as 5. The number of poles (P) may be set to be 12. In this case the number of stator slots (Z) will be 210 (3½*5*12). This configuration results in greatest common divisor (GCD) of the number of stator slots (Z=210) and the number of poles (P=12) being 6. This configuration results in the lowest common multiplier (LCM) of the number of stator slots (Z=210) and the number of poles (P=12) being 420.
Referring now to
The third optimal configuration 74 is similar to the first and second optimal configurations 70, 72 unless otherwise described. In the third optimal configuration 74, the GCD and LCM of the number of stator slots (Z) and the number of poles (P) is at least 6 and at least 72, respectively. In one example, the number of phases (M) is 3, the number of poles (P) is 14 and the total number of stator slots (Z) is 63(½*3*14). This configuration results in the GCD and LCM (of the number of stator slots and the number of poles) being 7 and 126, respectively.
In another example, the number of phases (M) is 3, the number of poles (P) is 16 and the total number of stator slots (Z) is 72 (1½*3*16). This configuration results in the GCD and LCM (of the number of stator slots and the number of poles) being 8 and 144, respectively. In another example, the number of phases (M) is 3, the number of poles (P) is 18 and the total number of stator slots (Z) is 81 (1½*3*18). This configuration results in the GCD and LCM (of the number of stator slots and the number of poles) being 9 and 162, respectively.
A fractional stator slots per pole per phase (X) configuration having a defined parameter set as outlined above (optimal configurations 70, 72, 74) allows for greater flexibility in designing an electric machine 10 with a particular torque or system voltage requirement. Arbitrarily specifying a configuration for an electric machine 10 will not produce the required torque output or meet minimum noise requirements. Only specific configurations with a particular number of slots (Z), number of phases (M), number of poles (P), number of winding sets (W) etc. will produce the desired functionality. These specific configurations cannot readily be determined by inspection. If an arrangement is not selected correctly, the design will either perform poorly or will not meet the functional requirements. Because of the large number of possible combinations, the optimal configuration is neither easily determined nor obvious.
For example, if the stator slots per pole per phase (X) is chosen to be 2¼ or 1¾ or 1⅕, cross jumpers are required in order to complete the connections between the bar conductors 42. As previously shown in
The detailed description and the drawings or figures are supportive and descriptive of the invention, but the scope of the invention is defined solely by the claims. While some of the best modes and other embodiments for carrying out the claimed invention have been described in detail, various alternative designs and embodiments exist for practicing the invention defined in the appended claims.