The disclosure relates generally to the field of electric motors, and in particular to fault detection in an electric motor controller.
Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors (PMSM) or Brushless DC (BLDC) motors are increasingly popular electric motor designs, which replaces wear-prone brushed DC motors with an electronic controller that improves the reliability of the unit and reduces the footprint and size, making PMSMs or BLDC motors suitable for applications with restricted space. Sensorless motor control techniques may be used to detect a motor component position status for such motors. This may be done by detecting the potential or electromotive force (EMF) generated in the windings which gives rise to secondary magnetic field that opposes the original change in magnetic flux driving the motor's rotation. In resisting the motor's natural movement, the EMF is referred to as a back EMF, BEMF. However, sensorless motor control techniques have a drawback that a rotor mechanical block or stall condition may not be recognized by the sensorless algorithm. The inability to detect a locked or stopped rotor presents potential application safety concerns which are increasingly required for household motor control application standards, such as IEC 60730 (“Automatic electrical controls for household and similar use”) or IEC 60335-1 (“House and Similar Electrical appliances”). As a result, some existing solutions for detecting locked rotor conditions are extremely difficult at a practical level.
EP16190311A1 discloses a method for detecting a rotor lock condition in a sensorless PMSM by calculating an estimated rotor speed and estimated BEMF values using a BEMF observer and generating a BEMF error threshold value as a function of the estimated rotor speed subject to a minimum threshold value. A rotor lock condition can be detected if the BEMF falls outside a BEMF threshold. A problem with this approach is that the rotor lock condition can only be detected after the fault has occurred, i.e. once the rotor has physically locked. In some cases this may not provide adequate safety protection, for example when damage could occur as a result of a fault condition.
According to a first aspect there is provided an electric motor controller comprising:
The detector circuit may be configured to cause the driver circuit to disable the motor if a fault is detected.
The detector circuit may be configured to output a fault indication if a fault is detected.
The rotor speed error threshold may be defined from the rotor speed demand signal.
The rotor speed error threshold may be a range within around +/−5% or +/−10% of the rotor speed demand signal.
According to a second aspect there is provided an electric motor system comprising:
The electric motor may be a permanent magnet synchronous motor.
According to a third aspect there is provided a method of detecting a fault in an electric motor controller, the electric motor controller comprising:
The detector circuit may cause the driver circuit to disable the motor if a fault is detected.
The detector circuit may output a fault indication if a fault is detected.
The rotor speed error threshold may be defined from the rotor speed demand signal.
The rotor speed error threshold may be a range within around +/−5% or +/−10% of the rotor speed demand signal.
These and other aspects of the invention will be apparent from, and elucidated with reference to, the embodiments described hereinafter.
Embodiments will be described, by way of example only, with reference to the drawings, in which:
It should be noted that the Figures are diagrammatic and not drawn to scale. Relative dimensions and proportions of parts of these Figures have been shown exaggerated or reduced in size, for the sake of clarity and convenience in the drawings. The same reference signs are generally used to refer to corresponding or similar feature in modified and different embodiments.
Measurement circuits 106 include a current measurement circuit 107 and a DC bus voltage measurement circuit 108. The motor 102 includes a rotor 109, stator 110 and shaft 111, the shaft 111 being mechanically coupled to the rotor 109. Windings are disposed in the motor 102, which are connected to the motor control circuit 101 by conductors 112, 113, 114. The conductors 112, 113, 114 are connected to outputs of the driver circuit 105 and to inputs of the measurement circuits 106. The measurement circuits 106 are connected to the processor 103 by one or more connection lines 116. The processor 103 is connected to the driver circuit 105 by one or more connection lines 115 to allow the processor 103 to control the driver circuit 105. The power source 119 is connected to the driver circuit 105 via live (L) and neutral (N) conductors 117, 118 to provide power for the driver circuit 105. The power source 119 may be provided with more than two outputs, for example in a three phase system.
The current measurement circuit 107 obtains one or more current measurements ia, ib, ic of the motor 102 windings. The DC bus voltage measurement circuit 108 obtains corresponding voltage measurements of the motor 102 windings. Such measurements can be complex measurements, including a direct (d) component and a quadrature (q) component.
The electric motor system 200 comprises control system elements 101 for providing fault detection based on BEMF observation with rotor speed estimation together with measured and requested speed values. The motor control circuit 101 includes ramp block 231, speed control block 232, quadrature-current (Q-current) control torque block 233, field control block 234, direct-current (D-current) control flux block 235, inverse Park transformation block 236, direct-current (DC) bus ripple elimination block 237, space vector modulation block 238, alternating-current-to-direct-current (AC-to-DC) power conversion block 239, inverter block 240, Clarke transformation block 241, Park transformation block 242, and BEMF tracking observer block 271 for estimating position and speed.
In operation, the ramp block 231 receives a requested angular velocity signal ωreq at input 247 and provides an output 248 to adjustment block 270. Adjustment block 270 receives an estimated angular velocity signal {circumflex over (ω)} at output 249 of BEMF observer block 271. Adjustment block 270 subtracts {circumflex over (ω)} from ωreq to provide an angular velocity control signal to speed control block 232 at output 250. Speed control block 232 may be implemented, for example, using a proportional integral (PI) controller. Speed control block 232 provides an output signal to adjustment block 245 at output 251. Adjustment block 245 receives a signal from Park transformation block 242 at output 252. Adjustment block 245 subtracts the signal at output 252 from the signal at output 251 to provide a signal at output 253 to Q-current control torque block 233. Q-current control torque block 233 may be implemented, for example, using a PI controller. Q-current control torque block 233 provides a signal Uq at output 254 to inverse Park transformation block 236. In this case, the signal Uq represents the q coordinate component for the rotor related orthogonal coordinate reference frame system (d,q).
Field control block 234 provides a field control signal to adjustment block 246 at output 255. Adjustment block 246 receives a motor current vector signal id from Park transformation block 242 at output 256, where id is the d coordinate component that is collinear to the rotor flux d coordinate. Adjustment block 246 subtracts the id signal at output 256 from the field control signal at output 255 and provides a signal at output 257 to D-current control flux block 235. D-current control flux block 235 may be implemented, for example, using PI controller. D-current control flux block 235 provides a signal Ud at output 258 to inverse Park transformation block 236. In this case, the signal Ud represents the d coordinate component for the rotor related orthogonal coordinate reference frame system (d,q).
Inverse Park transformation block 236 provides a signal Uα at output 259 to DC bus ripple elimination block 237 and to the BEMF observer block 271, and also provides a signal Uβ at output 260 to DC bus ripple elimination block 237 and to the BEMF observer block 271. In this case, the signals Uα, Uβ represent orthogonal coordinate components for the stator related orthogonal coordinate reference frame system (α, β). DC bus ripple elimination block 237 receives a signal Udcbus from output 265 of AC-to-DC power conversion block 239. DC bus ripple elimination block 237 provides compensation for ripple on the signal Udcbus and provides signals at outputs 261 and 262 to space vector modulation block 238. Space vector modulation block 238 provides pulse width modulation (PWM) motor drive signals PWMa,b,c to inverter block 240 at outputs 263. A line conductor 117 provides a line voltage to AC-to-DC power conversion block 239. A neutral conductor 118 provides a neutral voltage to AC-to-DC power conversion block 239. AC-to-DC power conversion block 239 provides DC voltages to inverter block 240 at one or more outputs 265 which are filtered using DC bus capacitor 264 across the 20 outputs. Inverter block 240 provides motor drive signals at conductors 112, 113, and 114 to electric motor 102 according to PWM motor drive signals PWMa,b,c.
Conductors 112, 113, and 114 from electric motor 102 provide signals (e.g., ia, ib and ic) to inputs of Clarke transformation block 241. Clarke transformation block 241 provides signals iα and iβ to Park transformation block 242 and to BEMF observer block 271 at outputs 266 and 267. Park transformation block 242 receives sin, cos ({circumflex over (θ)})—the sine and cosine of the estimated the rotor flux angle {circumflex over (θ)} relative to stator phase—at output 269 from BEMF observer block 271. Park transformation block 242 provides a d component motor current vector signal (e.g., id) at output 256 to adjustment block 246 and a q component motor current vector signal (e.g., iq) at output 252 to adjustment block 245, where the d coordinate component of the motor current vector id is collinear to the rotor flux d coordinate, and where the q coordinate component of the motor current vector iq is orthogonal to the rotor flux d coordinate. BEMF observer block 271 provides estimated angular velocity signal {circumflex over (ω)} to adjustment block 270 and to position and speed observer block 271 at output 249. BEMF observer block 271 also provides sin, cos ({circumflex over (θ)}) at output 269 to inverse Park transformation block 236 and to Park transformation block 242. In addition, the BEMF observer block 271 provides estimated BEMF signal value êδ at output 272, though this value may also be used by the BEMF observer block 271 to generate the angle error θerror.
The motor 102 is provided with a position or rotation sensor 201, the output from which provides a measured rotor speed signal ωmeas. The detector 280 also generates an estimated angular velocity signal {circumflex over (ω)} (which specifies the rotor angular speed) and one or more of the BEMF voltage values êδ and êγ. Using one or more of these estimated quantities, detector 280 may execute one or more algorithms to derive a BEMF error threshold value (BEMFErrorThreshold) and a filtered BEMF difference value (BEMFErrorFilt) for processing with the estimated rotor angular speed value and measures rotor speed signal to detect one or more types of faults.
Further details of the operation of the BEMF observer 271 are described in EP16190311A1, which describes the use of the BEMF error threshold value to determine a blocked rotation fault without the use of a position or rotation sensor on the motor. In applications where these and other types of faults need to be detected in time to prevent damage occurring to the motor or driving circuit, a motor speed sensor 201 can be used in combination with the outputs from the BEMF observer 271.
As in EP16190311A1, a fault may be detected if the estimated BEMF signal 407 lies outside the threshold region defined by upper and lower bounds 408, 409 or if the estimated rotor angular speed value 406 falls below a minimum stall speed. Another type of fault may be detected if the measured rotor angular speed value 406 differs from the required rotor speed ωreq or estimated rotor speed {circumflex over (ω)} by no more than a predefined amount, for example within +/−5% or +/−10%. A measure of the actual rotor speed is required for determination of such faults, which may relate to faults within the motor control circuit 101 rather than in the motor 102. Such faults may for example result from a gain or offset error in the current measurement circuit 107, which may be gradual or abrupt, or from an input to the current measurement circuit 107 being disconnected. Such faults can be detected when the estimated BEMF signal lies outside the BEMF threshold defined by the upper and lower bounds 408, 409 while the measured rotor speed value 406 is within a rotor speed error threshold. In a general aspect therefore, a fault in the motor control circuit may be detected by the detector 280 when the estimated BEMF signal êδ lies outside of a calculated BEMF error threshold and the measured rotor angular speed is within a rotor speed error threshold.
The fault may for example be indicated, as shown in
An advantage of determining a fault in the motor control circuit using a combination of the estimated BEMF signal and a measured rotor speed is that the fault can be detected prior to the motor exhibiting any changes that may result from the error. Any damage that might result from the fault could therefore be prevented by detecting the fault early and, for example, disabling the motor.
Other fault detection processes may also operate along with the above described process, for example to monitor the measured rotor speed compared to the required motor speed to detect a locked rotor fault.
From reading the present disclosure, other variations and modifications will be apparent to the skilled person. Such variations and modifications may involve equivalent and other features which are already known in the art of memory systems, and which may be used instead of, or in addition to, features already described herein.
Although the appended claims are directed to particular combinations of features, it should be understood that the scope of the disclosure of the present invention also includes any novel feature or any novel combination of features disclosed herein either explicitly or implicitly or any generalisation thereof, whether or not it relates to the same invention as presently claimed in any claim and whether or not it mitigates any or all of the same technical problems as does the present invention.
Features which are described in the context of separate embodiments may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features which are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any suitable sub-combination. The applicant hereby gives notice that new claims may be formulated to such features and/or combinations of such features during the prosecution of the present application or of any further application derived therefrom.
For the sake of completeness it is also stated that the term “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, the term “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality, a single processor or other unit may fulfil the functions of several means recited in the claims and reference signs in the claims shall not be construed as limiting the scope of the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
21211406 | Nov 2021 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5729113 | Jansen | Mar 1998 | A |
8461789 | Paintz | Jun 2013 | B2 |
9809247 | Kleinau et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10075107 | Lepka | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10541632 | Schneider | Jan 2020 | B2 |
11716037 | Yang | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11764710 | Kulkarni | Sep 2023 | B2 |
20050029976 | Terry | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20140097777 | Leong | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20170077835 | Hirakata | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170126153 | Lepka et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20180115263 | Buckley et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20200169204 | Lakshmi Narasimha et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103248307 | Aug 2013 | CN |
3185411 | Jun 2017 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Slimen et al., “Abrupt Current Sensor Faults Signatures in a Salient PMSM Drive Using The Multiresolution Analysis Technique,” 2016 International Conference on Electrical Sciences and Technologies in Maghreb (CISTEM), 6 pages. |
Slimen et al., “Easy and effective multiple faults detection and localization method for PMSM drives,” 2019 International Conference on Advanced Systems and Emergent Technologies (IC_ASET), 6 pages. |
Bisheimer, et al., “Sensorless PMSM Drive with Tolerance to Current Sensor Faults,” 2008 34th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics, 6 pages. |
Khojet El Khil et al., “Diagnosis of Open-Switch and Current Sensor Faults in PMSM Drives Through Stator Current Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 55, No. 6, Nov./Dec. 2019, 13 pages. |
Huang et al., “Robust Reconstruction of Current Sensor Faults for PMSM Drives in the Presence of Disturbances,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 24, No. 6, Dec. 2019, 12 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230170835 A1 | Jun 2023 | US |