The present invention relates to dynamoelectric machines, and more particularly, to fields for dynamoelectric machines and methods of making them.
Dynamoelectric machines are machines that generate electric power or use electric power. Common types of dynamoelectric machines are alternators, generators, and electric motors.
Electric motors are used in a wide variety of applications involving power tools such as drills, saws, sanding and grinding devices, and yard tools such as edgers and trimmers, just to name a few such tools. These devices all make use of electric motors having an armature and a field, such as a stator.
There are a number of problem areas in the process just described. First of all, it is a capital intensive process. To tool a line to make a stator for a fractional horsepower motor that has a six second cycle time typically requires an investment in the three to five million dollar range. The insulating slot liners must be positioned correctly to meet U.L. (Underwriters Laboratories) requirements and kept positioned properly. In the existing process, the paper slot liners can move when the stator moves to the next station in the process.
The end ring limits slot fill. Slot fill is the amount of magnet wires that can be placed in the slots. The greater the slot fill, the higher the magnetic field generated by the stator. However, increasing the amount of magnet wires placed in the slots can cause the end ring to deform. The end ring can be thickened to reinforce it, but this reduces the slot volume available for the magnet wires.
In the manufacturing process for the stator described above, once the magnet wires have been wound in the slots and the ends of the magnet wires terminated, the magnet wires are bonded if bondable wire is being used and a “trickle” resin is applied over the magnet wires if trickle resin is being used. The process of applying the trickle resin is a somewhat difficult process to manage to obtain consistent results. It also has a number of drawbacks, not the least of which is the cost and difficulty of performing it with reliable, consistent results.
Initially, the trickle process requires the use of a relatively large and expensive oven to carefully preheat the partially assembled stators to relatively precise temperatures before the trickle resin can be applied. The temperature of the trickle resin also needs to be carefully controlled to achieve satisfactory flow of the resin through the slots in the lamination stack. It has proven to be extremely difficult to achieve consistent, complete flow of the trickle resin through the slots in the lamination stack. As such, it is difficult to achieve good flow between the magnet wires with the trickle resin. A cooling period must then be allowed during which air is typically forced over the stators to cool them before the next manufacturing step is taken. Further complicating the manufacturing process is that the trickle resin typically has a short shelf life, and therefore must be used within a relatively short period of time. This requires that batches of the trickle resin be mixed frequently with any that isn't used within its shelf life wasted.
The end result is that stators must often be designed for the process as opposed to optimum performance and cost.
An electric motor has a field assembly, such as a stator, for a dynamoelectric machine has field coils that are wound to a net shape. Lead wires are brought out from the ends of each field coil. The field coils are insulated with insulating sleeves or insulating slot liners. The field coils are assembled with stator core pieces, such as pole pieces and return path pieces, into the stator. The stator core pieces are formed prior to being assembled with the field coils. In an aspect of the invention, the pole pieces and return path pieces are separately formed and then assembled together with the field coils, which have also been separately formed. In an aspect of the invention, a hand-held power tool has such a motor.
In an aspect of the invention, the field coils are insulated by wrapping a slot liner made of a layer of insulation material around the portions that are disposed between the pole pieces and return path pieces, the layer of insulation material having a B-stage thermoset adhesive or a thermoplastic adhesive on one or both surfaces.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description and the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The following description of the preferred embodiment(s) is merely exemplary in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses.
Referring to
Field coils 304 have coil ends 305 with lead wires 302 extending therefrom which are brought out at step 214 from the formed coil 614. Lead wires 302 can be brought out using different alternatives. Coil ends 305 may illustratively be terminated at terminals 307 and lead wires 302 attached to the terminals 307. Lead wires 302 can be attached directly to coil ends 305. Lengths of coil ends 305 can be insulated by various methods, such as shrink tubing, various wall thickness TFE or PTFE tubing, and the insulated lengths provide the lead wires 302. The use of tubing, such as TFE or PTFE tubing, in addition to insulating the coil ends 305, further provides the advantages of strain relief and added rigidity to lead wires 302. Sliding tubing such as TFE or PTFE tubing over the coil ends 305 shields them and the tubing can be retained by any type of end termination.
At step 216, the formed coil 614 is insulated to form field coil 304. The formed coil 614 can be insulated by encapsulating it with an encapsulation material 309 that forms an encapsulation 313. The encapsulation material 309 is illustratively an elastomeric thermoplastic or thermoset plastic, such as thermoset liquid silicon rubber. Encapsulation material 309 is illustratively injection molded around field coils 304. It should be understood that other processes and materials can be used to encapsulate the formed and bonded coils with encapsulation material 309, such as transfer molding or spraying the encapsulation material 309. The encapsulation material could also be a more rigid thermoset. The encapsulation material may illustratively be thermally conductive and could also be a more rigid type of thermally conductive plastic, such as a Konduit® thermoplastic commercially available from LNP Engineering Plastics of Exton, Pa. The encapsulation material may illustratively be applied using the known vacuum impregnation process. The formed field coil 614 would be placed in a vacuum chamber and the encapsulation material wicks onto the field coil 614.
Encapsulating the field coils 304 with the appropriate encapsulating material enhances abrasion protection and improves tracking resistance. Some types of power tools, such as grinders that are used to grind metal and remove mortar between bricks (called tuck pointing), generate a lot of abrasive particles that are drawn into the motor during operation and thus pass over the stator and rotor coil windings. These particles abrade the insulation of the wire, and also tends to abrade the extra trickle varnishes or slurries that may be used to coat the coil windings. Eventually, the wires electrically short and the motor burns up, resulting in an inoperable power tool. Tracking is a condition where an alternate conductive path is created outside the motor, thus carrying electrical current where it normally doesn't go, such as outside of the motor windings. This path is normally created by metal debris drawing into the motor during operation of the power tool that collects in the tool housing and contacts exposed elements of the electrical system of the power tool, such as brush boxes, exposed motor field windings, and lead wires.
Silicon rubber, such as liquid silicon rubber, is one such encapsulating material that can be used to enhance abrasion protection and improve tracking resistance. Silicon rubber is an elastomeric material and cushions the particles drawn into the motor when the particles impact it. Using a grade of silicon rubber with an appropriate durometer gives a desirable balance of functionality in terms of mechanical strength, abrasion resistance, tear resistance, and manufacturability. Illustratively, the liquid silicon rubber has a durometer in the range of 40 to 70 Shore A, and illustratively greater than about 50, and a high tear strength, that is, a tear strength of 200 pounds per inch or greater. It should be understood that other elastomers having comparable properties can also be used as the encapsulating material. The silicon rubber, or similar elastomers, can be applied by various means in addition to injection molding, such as spray-on, brush-on and compression molding and can be cured by any appropriate method, such as heat cure, room temperature cure, moisture cure and UV light cure.
Alternatively or in addition to encapsulating the field coils, insulating slot liners, such as slot liner 322 (
Insulated field coils 304 are assembled with stator core pieces 306 to form stator 300. Stator core pieces 306 include pole pieces 308 and back iron or return path pieces 310.
Stator core pieces 306 are formed at step 220 out of steel laminations, as discussed above. In this regard, the laminations can be stacked and bonded together, such as by welding, or the laminations 706 (
It should be understood that forming the stator core pieces 306 is illustratively carried out independently of forming field coils 304 and vice versa. Consequently, stator core pieces 306 and field coils 304 can be made on separate lines and stockpiled until needed. It also allows the geometry of field coils 304 and stator core pieces 306 to be optimized. Moreover, pole pieces 308 are illustratively made separately from return path pieces 310. This allows the geometry of the pole pieces 308 and the return path pieces 310 to be separately optimized. Preferably, the pole pieces 308 are identical as are the return path pieces 310 and the field coils 304.
Each pole piece 308 illustratively has a neck 311 with a rectangular outer base 312 with an inwardly opening arcuate cylindrical pole tip section 314 thereon having pole tips 318. Each return path piece 310 is illustratively semi-cylindrical with opposed ends 316 shaped to attach to one or both of the opposed ends 316 of the other return path piece 310 and the rectangular outer bases 312 of pole pieces 308. In assembling encapsulated field coils 304 and stator core pieces 306, encapsulated field coils 304 are placed over the necks 311 of respective pole pieces 308. Return path pieces 310 are then secured to pole pieces 308, such as by snapping together, welding, riveting, with screws, forming operations, or the like.
An armature, such as armature 352 (
The process just described provides a number of advantages. A relatively simple, inexpensive machine can be used to wind the field coils 304. Moreover, multiple magnet wires can be wound at the same time to form the field coils 304. It also provides for a higher slot fill factor (total area of wire in the winding slot, including wire insulation, divided by available or total area of the winding slot), particularly when the wires of the coils are compressed during bonding. Looked at a different way, it provides for denser field coil that has a higher packing factor (total area of the wire, including wire insulation, divided by the area of the envelope of the field coil defined by the inner and outer perimeters of the field coil).
Compressing the wires during bonding improves bonding by assuring that adjacent wires of the coil are firmly together resulting in increased bond strength. Also, by pressing the wires of the coil together, many of the voids from the winding process are eliminated. This reduces or eliminates air pockets in the coil resulting in improved heat transfer because the inner wires of the coil are in direct contact with the outer wires, which are exposed to airflow when the motor is in operation. The resistive heat generated during operation of the motor can thus be dissipated through the coil quicker by being conducted through adjacent wires rather than convection through an air pocket. Finally, by compressing the wires of the coil together, a higher slot fill factor and packing factor can be achieved compared to conventional winding techniques. This allows for more turns of wire or equal turns of larger gauge (thicker) wire than provided by conventional winding techniques. Field coils having packing factors of greater than sixty, seventy, eighty and up to about eighty five percent can be achieved with this process.
In an aspect of the invention, multi-stranded wire is used to wind the field coils 304 which also provides for more slot fill. A commercially available wire of this type is commonly known as litz wire.
In an aspect of the invention, multiple magnet wires having different functions and, illustratively, different sizes, can be wound to form the field coils 304. For example, eighteen gauge magnet wire can be wound in each field coil 304 to form one or more coils that are energized to provide the magnetic field that interacts with the armature of the electric motor to rotate the armature. Twenty-one gauge wire can be wound in each of field coils 304 to form coils that are energized to brake the armature. In this regard, the magnet wires of different sizes are wound sequentially, that is, first one size of magnet wire is wound and then the second size of magnet wire is wound, or they are wound at the same time. The twenty-one gauge wire is illustratively wound with more turns than the eighteen gauge wire to produce the needed amount of flux to brake the armature quickly.
Forming the field coils 304 into predetermined shape(s), such as by winding them to pre-determined shape(s), and then bonding the magnet wires 303 allows the field coils 304 to be wound so that they extend beyond edges 320 of pole tips 318 of pole pieces 308 when field coils 304 are assembled in stator 300. That is, the field coils 304 can extend beyond the edges 320 of pole tips 318 of pole pieces 308. In this regard, the return path pieces 310 may be formed so that they are axially longer than the pole pieces 308. This also allows the magnet wire to be wound so that the field coils 304 extend around or beyond ends of the pole pieces 308 and not extend beyond the edges of the return path pieces 310 once they are assembled in stator 300. Also, the coil forming step allows the field coils 304 to be formed more compactly, as discussed, and thinner. By being able to form the field coils 304 so that they extend beyond edges 320 of pole tips 318 of pole pieces 308 and be more compact, applicants have determined that at least ten percent more output power can be achieved as well as providing better thermal characteristics for a given size field. For example, applicants found that an electric motor having a 59 mm diameter stator made in accordance with the invention has about thirty-six more percent output power than an electric motor having a 59 mm diameter conventionally made stator. This also permits a smaller diameter stator to be used for a given amount of output power. For example, applicants found that an electric motor having a 55 mm diameter stator formed according to the invention has about the same output power as an electric motor having a 59 mm diameter conventionally formed stator.
Forming the field coils 304, illustratively into net shapes, and then assembling the field coils to the pole pieces also allows the overall diameter of stator 300 for a given diameter motor to be kept the same but allows a larger diameter armature to be used. As is known, the maximum motor performance measured by cold or hot max watts out increases as the size of the armature increases. More specifically, as the diameter of a motor armature increases, the power of a motor goes up by the square of the armature diameter. But with conventional motors, every incremental increase in the diameter of the armature results in a corresponding increase in the diameter of the stator and thus of the motor. A motor using a stator made in accordance with the invention discussed above and as further discussed below allows the windings of the field coils, such as field coils 304, to be packed more tightly. It also allows them to be packed more thinly which in turn allows the thickness of the stator core pieces to be reduced. Packing the windings of the field coils 304 thinner allows, as discussed above, the diameter of the motor to be reduced or a larger diameter armature used for a given diameter motor. The above motor having a 55 mm diameter stator constructed in accordance with this invention (which is also the diameter of the motor) for use in a small angle grinder provides a power output of about 1000 W. To achieve a power output of 1000 W using a conventional stator requires a 59 mm stator.
Using the above referenced motor with the conventional 59 mm diameter stator as an example, which has field coils wound about the pole tips of the poles by a needle-winder as is conventional, this motor has a total slot area for the field coils (slot area being the area in which the field coils can be disposed which in the case of the conventional needle wound field is limited by the width or arc of the pole tips of the poles) of about 90 mm2 and radial dimensions as follows:
The armature winding in both cases is eight turns of 0.52 mm wire and winding of each field coil in both cases is sixty-two turns of 0.75 mm wire.
Alternatively, a 59 mm diameter stator constructed according to this invention could be used allowing for the diameter of the armature to be increased 4 mm, with a commensurate increase in power.
Table 1 below shows the armature OD, Field OD, Armature OD/Field OD ratio, and power output at 38,000 RPM for conventional AC motors having a Field OD of 57 mm and 59 mm and Table 2 below shows the same information for AC motors with fields made in accordance with the foregoing aspect of the invention having a field O.D. of 55 mm and 59 mm.
Referring to the AC motor having a 59 mm field O.D. as an example, as can be seen from Tables 1 and 2, the motor made in accordance with the foregoing aspect of the invention allows use of a 37 mm O.D. armature with a commensurate increase in power to 1600 Watts at 38,000 RPM compared to a conventional AC motor which utilizes a 35.19 mm O.D. armature and has a power output of 1000 Watts at 38,000 RPM. Also as can be seen from Tables 1 and 2, a motor having a 55 mm O.D. field made in accordance with this aspect of the invention allows use of a 35.19 mm O.D. armature resulting in a power output of 1050 Watts at 38,000 RPM, which is more than 1.25 times the power of an existing AC motor having a 56.96 mm O.D. field which also uses a 35.19 mm O.D. armature. In accordance with the foregoing aspect of the invention, for a given motor volume (motor outside diameter×motor length) an AC electric motor 350 (
Forming the stator core pieces 306 separately from each other and particularly from the field coils 304 decouples an important aspect of the design and configuration of the field coils from the design and configuration of the stator core pieces 306, the pole pieces 308 in particular. In conventional stators with needle-wound field coils, the field coils can't extend beyond the edges of the pole tips since the pole tips are used to hold the wires of the field coils during winding and before bonding or application of the trickle resin. The usable field winding area is thus defined by the width or arc (included angle) of the pole tips. While the arc of the pole tips can be increased to increase the area in which the field coils can be wound, this causes performance problems, particularly, commutation performance. Extending the arc of the pole tips too much degrades commutation. Thus, commutation performance limits the degree to which the area in which the coils are wound can be increased by increasing the arc of the pole tips. In contrast, in a stator made in accordance with the invention as described above and below, such as stator 300, the arc of the pole tips does not limit the area in which the field coils can be disposed, and thus does not limit the size of the field coils 304. As discussed, the field coils 304 can be formed so that they extend beyond the edges 320 of the pole tips 318. That is, the arc or included angle of the field coil is greater than the arc or included angle of the pole tips. Thus, in a two pole stator such as stator 300, the two field coils 304 can be formed so that their respective edges are almost adjacent each other, that is, each field coil 304 has an arc (included angle) of almost one-hundred and eighty degrees, as shown representatively by field coils 614 in
Forming the field coils 304 before assembling them in stator 300 also provides the advantage of simplifying “leading” them. “Leading” the field coils 304 is the process of bringing out or attaching lead wires, such as lead wires 302. In conventional stators where the field coils are needle-wound around the poles, a length of the magnet wire must be brought out from the wound coil and either attached to a terminal placed in the end ring or if used as the lead wire, terminals attached. If the magnet wire is used as the lead wire, it must be strain relieved. This process typically results in a length of wire (magnet wire, lead wire, or both) that is longer than needed for the actual lead wire which must then be routed through the stator to secure it and keep it from touching the armature when the motor in which the stator is assembled in use. In contrast, by forming field coils 304 separately from the stator core pieces 306 and before they are assembled in stator 300, the “leading” process is simplified as it is much easier to get access to the coil since it is not in the stator. The lead wire can be attached directly adjacent the coil with little magnet wire needed to be brought out from the coil. If the magnet wire is used as the lead wire, only the length needed for the lead wire need be brought out. A further advantage is that if an unrepairable mistake is made in “leading” the field coil 304, only that field coil 304 need be scrapped and it can be scrapped without any disassembly. In contrast, if a mistake is made in leading a field coil in a conventional stator, either the entire stator has to be scrapped or the field coils disassembled from the stator and new field coils wound, which is usually impractical if not impossible.
Pressing the stator core pieces 306 out of iron powder provides additional advantages to those described above. The stator core pieces 306, the pole pieces 308 in particular, can be formed in one operation as a three-dimensional part. In contrast, in the conventional process described above, the pole pieces of the stator are made by stacking an appropriate number of laminations, in effect, stacking the appropriate number of two-dimensional pieces to arrive at the resulting three-dimensional pole piece. By pressing the stator core pieces 306 from iron powder, tighter tolerances can be maintained than with the conventional process.
Using insulated iron powder as the iron powder provides additional advantages in that insulated iron powder has low eddy current losses.
To assemble stator 400, field coils 406 are placed over necks 414 of pole pieces 404. Necks 414 have opposed receiving pockets 504 (
Field coils 406, when encapsulated with an elastomeric encapsulation material such as liquid silicon rubber, snap over lips 528 and into undercuts 527 which retains them in place during further assembly of stator 400. Bumps or other interference features may illustratively be formed of the encapsulation material where the field coils abut the pole tip portions 522 to further retain the field coils 406 to the pole pieces. In a variation, lips 528 may also be staked over field coils 406 in one or more places, shown illustratively at 529, to provide further retention of field coils 406 as shown in
Ends 418 of field coils 406 may extend beyond pole tips 420 of pole pieces 404. Return path pieces 402 are then brought in radially (laterally) and mated to the pole pieces 404. Opposed edges 423 of radial outer ends 422 of pole pieces 404 have mating features 424 that mate with corresponding mating features 426 in edges 428 of return path pieces 402, as described in more detail below.
In an aspect of the invention, field coils 406 may have mating features 410 formed in encapsulation 408. Pole pieces 404 have corresponding mating features 412 formed therein, and in this regard, pole pieces 404 may be encapsulated with an encapsulation material with the mating features 412 formed in this encapsulation, or the mating features 412 formed directly in the soft magnetic material of which pole pieces 404 are made. Mating features 410 may illustratively be a projection or detent and mating feature 412 would then be a corresponding hole or recess. The converse could also be used—that is, mating feature 412 is the projection or detent and mating feature 410 is the corresponding hole or recess. Mating features 410 of field coils 406 and mating features 412 of pole pieces 404 mate together when field coils 406 are placed over the necks 414 of pole pieces 404, holding each field coil 406 to a respective pole piece 404, making coil/pole subassemblies 416. Pole pieces 404 may illustratively be made of laminations or of iron powder, such as insulated iron powder, such as described above with reference to
Turning to
Each receiving pocket 504 is illustratively larger than the projection 500 of the respective return path piece 402 so that projection 500 is easily received in the receiving pocket 504. This is accomplished by forming finger 506 so that it is at an angle 514 with respect to projection 500, as shown in
Once the projections 500 of return path pieces 402 are inserted into receiving pockets 504 of respective pole pieces 404, the fingers 506 of pole pieces 404 are deformed radially inwardly so that projections 510 extending radially inwardly from outer ends 512 of fingers 506 are received in recesses 502 of respective return path pieces 402. The mating of projections 510 in recesses 502 forms mating detents 518 (
Illustratively, when return path pieces 402 are mated with pole pieces 404, they are brought together radially shown by arrow 440 in
Making the return path pieces 402 separately from the pole pieces 404 also provides the advantage that not only can different materials, such as different magnetic grades of steel, be used to make them, but different construction techniques can be used. For example, the pole pieces 404 could be made of stacks of laminations as described above and the return path pieces made of solid steel. The pole pieces 404 would then include deformable portions that would be deformed against corresponding portions of return path pieces 402 to fasten the return path pieces 402 and pole pieces 404 together.
While stators 300 and 400 (
In an aspect of the invention, the core pieces of the stator include at least three pieces—two pole pieces and one return path piece. In an aspect of the invention, the pole pieces, return path piece or pieces and the field coils are all separately formed and then assembled together. By separately formed, it is meant that the pole pieces are formed separately from the return path piece or pieces which are in turn formed separately from the field coils.
Raised pads 608 maintain coil 614 in centered spaced relation to a surface 620 of core plate 602 facilitating the flow of the encapsulating material 309 around the radial inner side 622 of coil 614. Holes 610 result in compression tabs or projections 624 being formed in encapsulation 313 on the radial inner side 622 of field coil 304 and, if provided in the cavity plate of mold 600, on the radial outer side 628 of field coil 304. (For continuity, reference number 622 is used to identify the radial inner side of coil 614 and of field coil 304). Raised pads 608 form recesses 626 in the encapsulation 313 on radial inner side 622 of field coil 304 and, if provided in the cavity plate of mold 600, on the radial outer side 628 of field coil 304. In addition to providing spacing between coil 614 and core plate 602, and the cavity plate of the mold 600 if provided on the cavity plate, raised pads 608 can also be used to thin out the walls of the encapsulation 313 that encapsulates coil 614 of field coil 304. Compression tabs 624 provided added areas of compression between field coil 304 and the pole pieces 308 (compression tabs 624 on the radial inner side 622 of field coil 304) and between the field coil 304 and the return path pieces 310 (compression tabs 624 on the radial outer side 628 of field coil 304) when field coil 304 is assembled into stator 300 (
With reference to
Coil 614 of field coil 304 can be insulated by processes other than encapsulation, such as applying a resin coating to them by using the trickle resin process, applying an epoxy coat to them by dipping the formed coil 614 in a tank of epoxy, a powder coat process where heated coil windings cure powdered epoxy on the coil wires, applying an electrically insulating foam to them, or winding insulating tape, such as electrical insulating tape or epoxy tape, around them. In one type of powder coat process, heated coils are placed in a fluidized bed of epoxy. When the coils are insulated by coating, the coating can be applied to the coils before they are assembled in the stator or after. It should also be understood that the coils may be encapsulated or coated to improve abrasion protection and tracking resistance and the coils further insulated to provide insulation between the coils and the stator core pieces, such as with insulated slot liners or winding insulating tape around the encapsulated or coated coils.
Such electrical insulating material, other than electrical insulating foam, is not compliant, so clearances must be left between the insulating material 702 and the field laminations, such as return and pole pieces 402, 404. These clearances result in a degree of looseness of field coils 700 in stator 400. To enhance product life and durability, these clearances need to be eliminated, or at least minimized. To do so, a compliant material 708 (
If foam is used as electrically insulating material 702 or compliant material 708, it may illustratively be thermally conductive to enhance heat transfer. In this regard, it may contain fillers such as ceramics to increase thermal conductively. Other types of fillers can be used, such as carbon which is cheaper than ceramic, if suitable for the electrical design of the product.
Referring now to
The use of insulating sleeve 900 is now described. In assembling the stator 400, two insulating sleeves 900 are placed on field coil 1104 with opposite sides 1102 (
A field coil/sleeve assembly 1100 is then placed over the neck 414 of each of the pole pieces 404 and the pole pieces 404 mated with the return path pieces 402. The pole tips 420 of each pole piece 404 are received in the pockets 1000 (
Turning to
With reference to
As mentioned, insulating sleeve 900 may illustratively be made of compliant material, such as liquid silicon rubber, and may illustratively be used in lieu of encapsulating the field coils. This provides the benefit of not having to insert mold the field coils with an encapsulant. Insulating sleeves 900 can be molded separately at a rate that applicants expect will be much faster than the rate at which the field coils can be wound and the mold(s) used to mold the insulating sleeves will likely be able to have more cavities than the mold(s) used to insert mold the field coils.
Insulating slot liner 1300 may illustratively be “C” or “U” shaped and may illustratively be preformed so that it fits the contours of the field coils, such as field coils 614, and radially outer surfaces 1500 (
The use of insulating slot liners 1300 is now described. In assembling the stator 400, cover strips 1400 are removed from the inner adhesive strips 1304 of two insulating slot liners 1300 which are then placed on field coil 614 with the opposites sides of the field coil 614 received in respective ones of the insulating slot liners 1300. If an adhesive strip is provided on inner surface 1406 of inner section 1303, its cover strip is removed before placing the insulating slot liner 1300 over the side of field coil 614. Inner adhesive strip 1304 secures the insulating slot liner 1300 to the side of the field coil 614 over which the insulating slot liner 1300 was placed. The cover strips 1400 are then removed from outer adhesive strips 1308 of the insulating slot liners 1300 and field coil/insulating slot liner assembly 1514 (
Inner adhesive strip 1304 may illustratively be a pliable adhesive strip, such as a foam or gel strip ranging from 0.001″ to 0.250″ in thickness, to take up clearances and fill into component contours of field coil 614 to provide a robust retention force. Outer adhesive strip 1308 may also be a pliable adhesive strip.
Outer adhesive strip 1308 may illustratively be sized so that there is a gap between its edges and the edges of substrate 1302, shown representatively at 1316. That is, outer adhesive strip 1308 is smaller than the outer surface 1310 on which it is disposed. By having a gap between the edges of substrate 1302 and outer adhesive strip 1308, that is, sizing outer adhesive strip 1308 so that it is smaller than the outer surface 1310 on which it is disposed, the adhesive on outer adhesive strip is completely covered by inner surface 1502 of return path piece 402 when insulating slot liner 1300 is assembled in stator 400. This minimizes or eliminates any dust or chips contacting the adhesive on outer adhesive strip 1308 and being retained thereon. Similarly, inner adhesive strip 1304 may illustratively be sized so that it is smaller than the inner surface 1306 of substrate 1302 on which it is disposed. It should be understood that the insulating slot liner 1300 could have multiple inner and outer adhesive strips 1304, 1308.
The inner and outer adhesive strips 1304, 1308 of the insulating slot liners 1300 serve three purposes. They retain the field coils 614 to the return path pieces 402 and pole pieces 404 and prevent slippage between field coils 614 and the return path pieces 402 and pole pieces 404. They act as a secondary support to hold together the windings of field coil 614. They also act as a secondary support to hold together the return path piece 402 and the pole piece 404.
The thickness of the substrate 1302 of insulating slot liner 1300 may illustratively be optimized to take up clearances thus keeping the assembly of the field coils 614 and the return path and pole pieces 402, 404 tight and keeping pressure on inner and outer adhesive strips 1304, 1308 as they contact field coils 614 and the inner surfaces 1502 of return path pieces 402, respectively. In a 59 mm O.D. stator 400, the optimum thickness of substrate 1302 is in the range of 0.002″ to 0.030″. The distal edge 1505 of outer section 1301 may also be folded over as shown at 1402 in
Certain materials, such as some types of insulated paper, that can be used for substrate 1302, have a smooth surface on one side and a rough surface on the other side. For these materials, insulating slot liner 1300 may illustratively be formed so that the smooth surface is the outer surface of substrate 1302 that contacts the surfaces 1500 of pole tips 420 and inner surfaces 1502 of return path pieces 402 to facilitate assembly.
As shown in
Alternatively or in addition to encapsulating the field coils and or using insulating slot liners, the stator core pieces 306 or appropriate portions of the stator core pieces can be encapsulated or covered with an encapsulating or coating material, such as thermoplastics and thermosets, which may illustratively be thermally conductive or not. By way of example and not of limitation, the stator core pieces 306 (or appropriate portions of them) can be covered with an epoxy coating that is either sprayed on or applied using an electrostatic coating process. With reference to
Referring to
In assembly, insulating slot liner 2000 is wrapped around the appropriate portion of the field coil, such as field coil 2100 (
The thickness of the material, such as insulating paper, used for insulating slot liner 2000 is chosen so that there is a slight pressure between field coil 2100, the insulating slot liner 2000, and the return path pieces 402 and the pole pieces 404 after final assembly. This will hold the field coil 2100 in the proper position until the B-stage adhesive is activated and cured. If there is not sufficient pressure, a temporary adhesive can be used until the B-stage adhesive is cured. The B-stage adhesive on both sides of the material used for insulating slot liner 2000 adheres to both the field coil 2100 and the return path pieces 402 and the pole pieces 404, and secures them to each other. This facilitates the motor in which the stator 400 is used withstanding heavy vibrations that are seen in some motor/power tool applications. The B-stage adhesive also acts to bond the individual laminations of the return path pieces 402 and pole pieces 404 together.
The description of the invention is merely exemplary in nature and, thus, variations that do not depart from the gist of the invention are intended to be within the scope of the invention. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application is a divisional of U.S. Ser. No. 10/934,333 filed Sep. 3, 2004. U.S. Ser. No. 10/934,333 claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/500,384, filed on Sep. 5, 2003, and 60/546,243 filed on Feb. 20, 2004. The disclosures of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
463693 | Storey | Nov 1891 | A |
771260 | Meston et al. | Oct 1904 | A |
1314132 | Dorsey | Aug 1919 | A |
1496037 | Varley | Jun 1924 | A |
1506746 | Griffith | Sep 1924 | A |
1654840 | Shivers | Jan 1928 | A |
2064090 | Sullivan et al. | Dec 1936 | A |
2251673 | Gillen | Aug 1941 | A |
2291013 | Wheeler | Jul 1942 | A |
2431867 | Galla | Dec 1947 | A |
2451921 | Cook | Oct 1948 | A |
2487258 | Morris | Nov 1949 | A |
2502185 | Thomas | Mar 1950 | A |
2550501 | Sims | Apr 1951 | A |
2615068 | Radice | Oct 1952 | A |
2631251 | Spielman | Mar 1953 | A |
2712084 | Bridenbaugh | Jun 1955 | A |
2778964 | Balke | Jan 1957 | A |
2919357 | Lung | Dec 1959 | A |
2982873 | Simmons et al. | May 1961 | A |
2989657 | Sampson | Jun 1961 | A |
2999176 | Lindstrom et al. | Sep 1961 | A |
3021443 | Tamm | Feb 1962 | A |
3045133 | Aske | Jul 1962 | A |
3122667 | Baciu | Feb 1964 | A |
3151262 | Howard et al. | Sep 1964 | A |
3161796 | Annis et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
3187211 | Ve Nard | Jun 1965 | A |
3339097 | Dunn | Aug 1967 | A |
3359520 | Foerster | Dec 1967 | A |
3382573 | Mantelet | May 1968 | A |
3440460 | Postema | Apr 1969 | A |
3443136 | Freeman et al. | May 1969 | A |
3443137 | McElroy | May 1969 | A |
3502922 | Welker | Mar 1970 | A |
3515923 | Clizbe et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3519862 | Walker | Jul 1970 | A |
3549926 | Pentland | Dec 1970 | A |
3577851 | Detheridge et al. | May 1971 | A |
3590208 | Martini et al. | Jun 1971 | A |
3600801 | Larsen et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3610784 | Rundell | Oct 1971 | A |
3643118 | Ichiki et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3644767 | Kasargod et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3646374 | Jordan et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3652879 | Plunkett et al. | Mar 1972 | A |
3679926 | Simmonds et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
3694903 | Diming | Oct 1972 | A |
3710437 | Kipple et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3735169 | Balke et al. | May 1973 | A |
3748511 | Crabb | Jul 1973 | A |
3748512 | Crabb et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3748714 | Kieffer | Jul 1973 | A |
3797106 | Costello | Mar 1974 | A |
3802066 | Barrett | Apr 1974 | A |
3809938 | Sjoberg et al. | May 1974 | A |
3826941 | Folmar | Jul 1974 | A |
3848331 | Pavlik et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3852137 | Balke et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3861026 | Swaim | Jan 1975 | A |
3866014 | Waller | Feb 1975 | A |
3922575 | Sauer | Nov 1975 | A |
3932928 | King | Jan 1976 | A |
3983435 | Sims | Sep 1976 | A |
4003128 | Dochterman | Jan 1977 | A |
4037312 | Deis | Jul 1977 | A |
4048527 | Hallerback et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4071788 | Martin et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4087712 | Mosimann et al. | May 1978 | A |
4095627 | Lonseth et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4107559 | Patel | Aug 1978 | A |
4131988 | Finegold | Jan 1979 | A |
4160926 | Cope et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4182026 | Searle | Jan 1980 | A |
4263524 | Diederichs | Apr 1981 | A |
4312387 | Finegold | Jan 1982 | A |
4370578 | Tilse | Jan 1983 | A |
4392070 | Zdaniewski | Jul 1983 | A |
4425519 | Balke et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4427740 | Stackhouse et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4427907 | Flick et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4433472 | Andoh et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4446393 | Finegold | May 1984 | A |
4469967 | Grierson et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4520965 | Kimura et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4533320 | Piekarsky | Aug 1985 | A |
4562164 | Miyazaki et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4612702 | Wheeler | Sep 1986 | A |
4624884 | Harada et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4649308 | Kranzler | Mar 1987 | A |
4665335 | Shimozono | May 1987 | A |
4698539 | Workman | Oct 1987 | A |
4703211 | Yazaki et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4712035 | Forbes et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4781986 | Alvino | Nov 1988 | A |
4816710 | Silvaggio et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4833356 | Bansal et al. | May 1989 | A |
4882832 | Lewis | Nov 1989 | A |
4893041 | Snider et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4922165 | Crawford et al. | May 1990 | A |
4947065 | Ward et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4950438 | Nakamura et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4963776 | Kitamura | Oct 1990 | A |
4968911 | Denk | Nov 1990 | A |
4975611 | Rochester | Dec 1990 | A |
4993290 | Obradovic | Feb 1991 | A |
4994697 | Santandrea | Feb 1991 | A |
5015904 | Kleemann | May 1991 | A |
5045742 | Armstrong et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5061088 | Sigurdsson | Oct 1991 | A |
5068563 | Cummings | Nov 1991 | A |
5099159 | Liptak et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5099568 | Santandrea | Mar 1992 | A |
5115556 | Gavrilidis et al. | May 1992 | A |
5182848 | Wheeler | Feb 1993 | A |
5239221 | Juan | Aug 1993 | A |
5239743 | Santandrea | Aug 1993 | A |
5256926 | Hagenlocher et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5304884 | Kitajima et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5341561 | Schorm et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5402028 | Koeber et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5403371 | Engdahl et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5460503 | Kitajima et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5480469 | Storstrom et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5493162 | Wuerth et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5528822 | Ponzio et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5536985 | Ward et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5628951 | Kitajima et al. | May 1997 | A |
5631431 | Andersson | May 1997 | A |
5634258 | Onodera et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5664317 | Ponzio et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5691591 | McCann | Nov 1997 | A |
5698922 | Halter | Dec 1997 | A |
5698923 | Scherzinger et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5703426 | Ueno et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5727307 | Gstohl et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5763978 | Uchida et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5786651 | Suzuki | Jul 1998 | A |
5806169 | Trago et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5814412 | Terada et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5821661 | Wissmach et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5859486 | Nakahara et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5939102 | George, Jr. | Aug 1999 | A |
5955814 | Fujiwara | Sep 1999 | A |
5977679 | Miller et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986377 | Yamada et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990247 | Terada et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995814 | Yeh | Nov 1999 | A |
6034461 | Sun | Mar 2000 | A |
6057625 | Stockman et al. | May 2000 | A |
6058593 | Siess | May 2000 | A |
6069421 | Smith et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075304 | Nakatsuka | Jun 2000 | A |
6107718 | Schustek et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6121711 | Nakahara et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6127761 | Shen et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147430 | Kusase et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157102 | Suzuki et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167610 | Nakahara et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6201321 | Mosciatti et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202286 | Schustek et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219900 | Suzuki | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226856 | Kazama et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6227822 | Chen | May 2001 | B1 |
6232681 | Johnston et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6232693 | Gierer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236173 | Meyer | May 2001 | B1 |
6242836 | Ishida et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261514 | Lindberg et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6300702 | Jack et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323571 | Nakahara et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6348080 | Arvidsson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353297 | Meyer | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362544 | Johnston et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6362553 | Nakahara et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6369483 | Hill | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389678 | Ackermann et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6414413 | Arai et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425176 | Ozawa et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436166 | Arvidsson et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6439862 | Chen | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6448685 | Mayer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452303 | Marioni | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6472792 | Jack et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476533 | Akutsu et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485579 | Nillius et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485677 | Johansson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6489697 | Ozawa et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6503444 | Andersson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6504284 | Kazama et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6507991 | Ozawa et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6509665 | Nishiyama et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6525437 | Ozawa et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6597080 | Soderberg | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6643910 | Kanai et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6645416 | Bock et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6653758 | Tsuneyoshi et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6661137 | Gauthier | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6683396 | Ishida et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6683397 | Gauthier et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6703748 | Arai et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6707225 | Bradfield | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6713929 | Meyer et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6794786 | Enomoto et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6812610 | Kim et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6822364 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7078843 | Du et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
20010045687 | Baumann et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020047425 | Coupart et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020047446 | Meyer | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020079779 | Muszynski | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020079780 | Muszynski | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020130580 | Arai et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020135259 | Eggers et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020146341 | Mars et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149281 | Saint-Michel et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149282 | Heidrich | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020171305 | Coupart et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020175587 | Vollmer | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020187000 | Heier et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030038555 | Ozawa et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030071535 | Wang et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030094876 | Hsu | May 2003 | A1 |
20030127933 | Enomoto et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030160532 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030160533 | Suzuki et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040021391 | Jones et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040056537 | Du et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040056538 | Du et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
233 811 | Apr 1911 | DE |
1 119 999 | Dec 1961 | DE |
1 880 000 | Oct 1963 | DE |
1 168 553 | Apr 1964 | DE |
1 945 459 | Mar 1970 | DE |
2 021 916 | Nov 1971 | DE |
28 43 006 | Apr 1980 | DE |
31 24 098 | Feb 1982 | DE |
83 28 208 | Jun 1984 | DE |
214 502 | Oct 1984 | DE |
33 36 340 | Apr 1985 | DE |
38 04 728 | Aug 1988 | DE |
38 42 560 | Jun 1990 | DE |
40 23 903 | Nov 1991 | DE |
40 21 591 | Jan 1992 | DE |
42 13 337 | Oct 1993 | DE |
42 33 558 | Mar 1994 | DE |
195 20 332 | Dec 1996 | DE |
298 00 928 | Mar 1998 | DE |
299 17 138 | Jan 2000 | DE |
199 12 864 | Sep 2000 | DE |
199 43 783 | Mar 2001 | DE |
100 55 750 | Dec 2001 | DE |
202 04 507 | Jun 2002 | DE |
102 29 333 | Jan 2004 | DE |
0 358 805 | Mar 1990 | EP |
0 154 469 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0 730 334 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0 612 139 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0 748 025 | Dec 1996 | EP |
0 875 979 | Nov 1998 | EP |
0 889 575 | Jan 1999 | EP |
1 073 180 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 087 497 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1 154 544 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1 235 325 | Aug 2002 | EP |
1 322 021 | Jun 2003 | EP |
1 339 158 | Aug 2003 | EP |
1 351 367 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1 453 179 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1 422 541 | Jan 1976 | GB |
1 596 181 | Aug 1981 | GB |
2 224 399 | May 1990 | GB |
49-149902 | Dec 1974 | JP |
56-035646 | Apr 1981 | JP |
56-61137 | May 1981 | JP |
57-162410 | Oct 1982 | JP |
57-183035 | Nov 1982 | JP |
58-25542 | Feb 1983 | JP |
58-49550 | Apr 1983 | JP |
59-151859 | Aug 1984 | JP |
59-175349 | Oct 1984 | JP |
59-230441 | Dec 1984 | JP |
60-237836 | Nov 1985 | JP |
61-030939 | Feb 1986 | JP |
61-39836 | Feb 1986 | JP |
61-132059 | Jun 1986 | JP |
61-210850 | Sep 1986 | JP |
61-218336 | Sep 1986 | JP |
62-081944 | Apr 1987 | JP |
63-299738 | Dec 1988 | JP |
63-299745 | Dec 1988 | JP |
63-299747 | Dec 1988 | JP |
63-299750 | Dec 1988 | JP |
01-122343 | May 1989 | JP |
02-146946 | Jun 1990 | JP |
02-129154 | Oct 1990 | JP |
03-253247 | Nov 1991 | JP |
04-056304 | Feb 1992 | JP |
04-105536 | Apr 1992 | JP |
04-138044 | May 1992 | JP |
04-259685 | Sep 1992 | JP |
04-347551 | Dec 1992 | JP |
05-038103 | Feb 1993 | JP |
05-184091 | Jul 1993 | JP |
05-68178 | Sep 1993 | JP |
05-70150 | Sep 1993 | JP |
06-006943 | Jan 1994 | JP |
06-014481 | Jan 1994 | JP |
06-113491 | Apr 1994 | JP |
06-253479 | Sep 1994 | JP |
06-276705 | Sep 1994 | JP |
08-107645 | Apr 1996 | JP |
08-163804 | Jun 1996 | JP |
08-196060 | Jul 1996 | JP |
08-322177 | Dec 1996 | JP |
09-023601 | Jan 1997 | JP |
09-023620 | Jan 1997 | JP |
09-037493 | Feb 1997 | JP |
09-056099 | Feb 1997 | JP |
09-98545 | Apr 1997 | JP |
09-131003 | May 1997 | JP |
09-149575 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09-149576 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09-149605 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09-149607 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09-168250 | Jun 1997 | JP |
09-215230 | Aug 1997 | JP |
09-219941 | Aug 1997 | JP |
09-219949 | Aug 1997 | JP |
09-233778 | Sep 1997 | JP |
09-234523 | Sep 1997 | JP |
09-247876 | Sep 1997 | JP |
09-252556 | Sep 1997 | JP |
09-308144 | Nov 1997 | JP |
10-164802 | Jun 1998 | JP |
10-271715 | Oct 1998 | JP |
10-271771 | Oct 1998 | JP |
11-220844 | Aug 1999 | JP |
11-266557 | Sep 1999 | JP |
11-332138 | Nov 1999 | JP |
2000-037050 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-060083 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2001-112204 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-112205 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001-128394 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-128404 | May 2001 | JP |
2002-209345 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-218714 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-369418 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-009434 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2003-070200 | Mar 2003 | JP |
2003-134712 | May 2003 | JP |
2003-164090 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004-040057 | Feb 2004 | JP |
WO 8707452 | Dec 1987 | WO |
WO 9004874 | May 1990 | WO |
WO 9512912 | May 1995 | WO |
WO 9819382 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 0112365 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 02084842 | Oct 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070024151 A1 | Feb 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60500384 | Sep 2003 | US | |
60546243 | Feb 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10934333 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 11542826 | US |