The present inventions relate generally to electric motors, and more particularly, to a motor with reduced torque ripple.
One type of electric motor is known as a synchronous reluctance motor. In a synchronous electric motor, the rotor rotates at a speed that is synchronized with the frequency of an AC power source (i.e., the field rotation of the stator). Induction motors, by contrast, are asynchronous since the rotor rotates at a slower speed than the stator field. A synchronous reluctance motor has pole regions of high magnetic permeance and insulated regions of low magnetic permeance. As the stator field rotates, the pole regions of the rotor are attracted by the stator field in order to rotate the rotor. A synchronous permanent magnet motor includes magnets in the rotor that are attracted to and/or repelled by the stator field to cause the rotor to rotate.
Torque ripple occurs in electrical motors when the design of the motor results in torque variations as the rotor makes a single revolution. Torque ripple may be caused by various factors related to the design of a motor. In general, torque ripple is produced by the changing alignment and misalignment of the stator and rotor as the rotor rotates through one revolution. A large variation in torque output as the motor rotates (i.e., torque ripple) is undesirable because it results in vibration and noise among other problems. Thus, electrical motors with low torque ripple are desirable.
An improved electrical motor is described. The electrical motor has a stator and a rotor. The stator and rotor each have a number of slots. The number of slots in the stator is unequal to the number of slots in the rotor. One advantage of the motor is that torque ripple may be reduced.
The invention may be more fully understood by reading the following description in conjunction with the drawings, in which:
Referring now to the figures, and particularly
In
The rotor 14 is formed of a series of magnetically permeable segments 20 and insulated regions 22 between the segments 20. The insulated regions 22 form slots 26 separating the segments 20. As shown in
A problem with the conventional design of
In
In
An advantage of the described motor 32 is that torque ripple may be significantly reduced. In particular, the torque ripple of the motor 32 in
By contrast, as shown in
In
While preferred embodiments of the inventions have been described, it should be understood that the inventions are not so limited, and modifications may be made without departing from the inventions herein. While each embodiment described herein may refer only to certain features and may not specifically refer to every feature described with respect to other embodiments, it should be recognized that the features described herein are interchangeable unless described otherwise, even where no reference is made to a specific feature. It should also be understood that the advantages described above are not necessarily the only advantages of the inventions, and it is not necessarily expected that all of the described advantages will be achieved with every embodiment of the inventions. The scope of the inventions is defined by the appended claims, and all devices and methods that come within the meaning of the claims, either literally or by equivalence, are intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3950664 | Andreica | Apr 1976 | A |
5818140 | Vagati | Oct 1998 | A |
20100026008 | Sawahata | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20120062053 | Moghaddam et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20140167547 | Hao | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1020100080653 | Jan 2009 | KR |
Entry |
---|
International Searching Authority (US), International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 21, 2018; Application No. PCT/US18/00336; 9 pgs. |
Marco Palmieri, Maurizio Perta, Francesco Cupertino, Effect of the Numbers of Slots and Barriers on the Optimal Design of Synchronous Reluctance Machines, May 22-24, 2014, 9 pgs., Piscataway, New Jersey. |
K. Wang, Q. Zhu, G. Ombach, M. Koch, S. Zhang, J. Xu, Optimal Slot/Pole and Flux-Banrier Layer Number Combinations for Synchronous Reluctance Machines, Mar. 27-30, 2013, 8 pgs.; Piscataway, New Jersey. |
Volodymyr Bilyi, Dieter Gerling, Dmytro Bilyi, Flux Barrier Design Method for Torque Ripple Reduction in Synchronous Reluctance Machines, Jun. 1-4, 2016, 6 pgs., Piscataway, New Jersey. |
T. Lange, B. Kerdsup, C. Weiss, R.W. De Donker, Torque Ripple Reduction in Reluctance Synchronous Machines Using an Asymmetric Rotor Structure, Apr. 8-10, 2014, 5 pgs., Piscataway, New Jersey. |
X.B. Bomela, M.J. Kamper, Effect of Stator Chording and Rotor Skewing on Performance of Reluctance Synchronous Machine, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 38, No. 1, Jan./Feb. 2002, 10 pgs., Piscataway, New Jersey. |
A. Vagati, M. Pastorelli, G. Franceschini, C. Petrache, Design of Low-Torque-Ripple Synchronous Reluctance Motors, Oct. 5-9, 1997, 8 pgs., Piscataway, New Jersey. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190068036 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |