Electric power modulated lead screw actuated butterfly blade damper and method of controlling air flow and pressure and pneumatic two position operator

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6447393
  • Patent Number
    6,447,393
  • Date Filed
    Saturday, April 29, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 10, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Examiners
    • Joyce; Harold
    • Boles; Derek S.
    Agents
    • Bensautti; Frank J.
Abstract
A damper assembly in which the position of the damper blades is controlled by a powered actuator which can be powered by a pneumatic drive, an electric motor drive, or other suitable power source. The powered actuator moves a drive shaft attached to the damper blades which causes the damper blades to open and close or be positioned somewhere in-between. The actuator can be controlled by sensors in a remote location. The actuator allows the damper to be modulated to set up pressure differentials and to be closed well in advance of oncoming smoke, fire, or other detected toxic fumes.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Technical Field




This invention relates to air/smoke/fire dampers. In particular, it relates to dampers which can be controlled to be set and reset (i.e., closed and opened) locally or remotely under power, and which seal the damper under pressure when the damper blades are in the closed position, and which can be operated partially closed to modulate pressure levels and to prevent smoke migration. This invention is also capable of setting normal operating building pressure differentials for cleaner air environments.




2. Background Art




Non-butterfly type dampers which can be closed automatically upon actuation by a heat-sensitive or other device are well-known in the art. Some such non-butterfly type dampers snap closed under either their own weight (i.e., gravity), or by mechanical force provided by springs. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,301,569 and 4,442,862.




As the art developed, external controls were devised to activate these dampers. Further, controls were also developed to cause the damper to be reset, that is, to be reopened to a ready position for heat responsive actuation in the event of fire or smoke conditions. A disadvantage of these prior art dampers is that they typically have virtually unsealable multiple vanes that are activated by a separate device exposed to the heat from a fire. As a result, the heat may disable the drive linkage, thus interfering with reactivation. Also, a substantial amount of smoke and even flames may pass through the damper before it is activated (if at all). It would be advantageous to have a simple two blade butterfly type damper system that could be activated more reliably in advance of the fire or smoke passing through the system, to more effectively prevent either from passing through the damper.




In addition to problems caused by complicated heat responsive closure, dampers which are closed by gravity or spring driven devices do not always form an effective seal. As a result, even though the damper may be in the closed position, smoke and flames may pass through the damper and spread to other parts of the building. It would be desirable to have dampers that form an effective seal rather than merely temporarily contain either the fire or the progress of smoke.




Typical multi-blade dampers can be actuated to control flow by a pneumatic actuator. However, it is desirable to have an override for the pneumatic control which will close the damper in case of a fire.




Also in the multi-blade damper, if the blades are pivoted in their longitudinal center, the air and heat does not help to keep the seal shut. Rather, pressure on one side of the pivot of the blade tends to force it open, while pressure on the other tends to force it closed. It is, therefore, desirable to have a simple end pivoted two blade damper which is forced even tighter closed and sealed under pressure.




It is further desirable to have a damper system in which the damper can be partially closed or opened, in order to modulate the pressure in the system. For example, it may be desirable to have more pressure in one room than another and to be able to adjust the opening in the damper, remotely, so as to affect the amount of air passing therethrough.




The prior art has failed to provide a damper which can be powered closed well before advancing smoke and fire arrives and have failsafe spring closure on power failure, which creates an effective seal, which can be sealed rapidly by a powered drive mechanism, and which can be partially opened and closed to modulate the pressure in the system in which the damper is used and have a simple two blade end pivoting with direct drive linkage for round and rectangular dampers.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




My invention comprises a butterfly configured damper assembly in which operation of the damper blades is controlled by a powered actuator. The powered actuator can be powered by a pneumatic drive, a electric user controlled drive, or other suitable power source. In one embodiment, an electric powered actuator is attached to the damper blades via a rotating shaft. The actuator causes cycling of the damper blades to move them between an open and a closed position, and/or causes them to be set in intermediate positions to set up controlled pressure environments by modulating the air flow through the damper. In another preferred embodiment, a pneumatic motor powered actuator drives the shaft to cycle the damper blades between the open and the closed position. In another embodiment, the actuator can be self-controlled by a heat responsive device. A remote control system can communicate with the damper controls via a hard wired connection, or alternatively, via radio transmission. The powered actuation provides sufficient force to operate against heated air flow and to seal the damper tightly; which, in turn, prevents both the smoke and fire from easily passing through the damper. This design lends itself more readily to round or oval duct configurations. This configuration provides for a better seal in the case of the fully closed position of the blades.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a side view partially broken away of a preferred embodiment of my invention that shows a damper assembly with a pneumatic actuator and with the blades in an open position.





FIG. 2

is a cutaway side view of the preferred embodiment of

FIG. 1

that shows the damper assembly with the blades in a closed position.





FIG. 3

is a top plan view of the preferred embodiment of

FIG. 1

showing the damper assembly with the blades in a closed position.





FIG. 4

is a cutaway side view of an alternative preferred embodiment that shows a damper assembly with the blades in an open position and with an electric motor powered actuator.





FIG. 5

is a cutaway side view of the preferred embodiment of

FIG. 4

that shows the damper assembly with the blades in a closed position.





FIG. 6

is a top plan view of the preferred embodiment of

FIG. 4

showing the damper assembly with the blades in a closed position.





FIG. 7A

illustrates an alternative preferred embodiment in which a remote sensor in an air duct controls a powered damper via hard wired lines.





FIG. 7B

illustrates another alternative preferred embodiment in which a remote sensor in an air duct controls a powered damper via radio communication.





FIG. 8

illustrates another alternative preferred embodiment in which an optional radiation blanket is installed on the surface of the damper blades.





FIG. 9

illustrates an alternative preferred embodiment in which travel limit switches are placed on the actuator to automatically control the actuator at preset damper travel limits.





FIG. 10

illustrates another preferred embodiment in which a thermal locking mechanism is used to prevent the damper blades from being open in high temperature conditions.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS





FIG. 1

is a cutaway side view that shows a butterfly-type damper designated generally


10


of a type well known in the art. This damper is operated by a powered actuator


30


. Such dampers


10


normally have two blades


16


which are shown in the open position. The blades


16


permit air to pass through damper


10


with minimal obstruction. Also shown in this view are blade stiffeners


12


which are attached to blades


16


and provide strengthening and rigidity to the structure of blades


16


. Those skilled in the art will recognize that any suitable means can be used to secure the blade stiffeners


12


to the blades


16


. For example, they can be welded, riveted, screwed, etc. In addition, any suitable material can be used to fabricate the blades


16


and the blade stiffeners


12


. The only requirement is that the material selected will perform satisfactorily in fire or smoke conditions.




In this embodiment, the powered actuator


30


is a pneumatic actuator. Pneumatic drives are well known per se. Powered actuator


30


is secured to the damper


10


structure by a side brace


34


which is fixedly attached at one end to the frame


18


of the damper


10


and fixedly attached at the other end to mounting blocks


36


on the powered actuator


30


. Between the powered actuator


30


and the damper


10


, there is an actuator support bracket


38


to help maintain the relative position between the powered actuator


30


and the damper


10


. Connected to the bracket


38


and the damper frame


18


is a mounting frame


39


. The support bracket


38


and mounting frame


39


retain a shaft


72


which is axially connected to the shaft


54


of the actuator


30


. Fixed mounted to both the actuator bracket


14


and the blade stiffeners


12


are members


20


which are connected at pivot points


22


,


24


. When the shaft


54


is moved axially, the bracket


14


is moved axially, and the damper blades


16


are pivoted about pivot points


26


. When the blades


16


pivot in this manner, they are moved from the open position shown in

FIG. 1

to the closed position shown in FIG.


2


.




The powered actuator


30


may be controlled by a heat responsive switch


32


, such as a conventional bi-metallic device, which is well known in the art, or any other suitable switch. It may


210


also be controlled by remote sensors, by manual activation, or by a computerized alarm system. Those skilled in the art will recognize that when remote activation is used, the damper


10


may be closed well in advance of the arrival of the fire or smoke. This provides significant advantages in terms of damage control by reducing the possibility that smoke or fire may pass through the damper


10


before it is closed. Activation based on heat responsive devices may be preset to be activated over a wide range of temperatures.





FIG. 2

is a cutaway side view that illustrates the preferred embodiment of

FIG. 1

with the damper blades


16


in the closed position. In this embodiment, when the powered actuator


30


is triggered, a pneumatic bellows type valve


39


is opened and the damper


10


moves to the closed position under pressure provided by spring


56


. The force supplied by the air flow forcibly presses the damper blades


16


against the damper frame


18


and holds the blades


16


in-place against any pressure build-up or differential pressure caused by fire, smoke, etc. Thus, a butterfly damper provides for not just a mechanical seal, but also an aerodynamic seal after the damper blades are closely mechanically.




The advantage of using the mechanical pressure of the spring


56


to seal the damper


10


in the first instance is that the mechanical pressure provided by the spring is less exposed to failure. Note that it is enclosed and down stream of the hot air flow.




The damper illustrated can be round or rectangular.




When heated, the bi-metal control


32


shown can push the plunger of the bellows-type valve and allow air to bleed off of that valve control. This allows the spring in the actuator to close the damper, because there is no air on the bladder of the actuator.




In

FIG. 3

, a top plan view is shown that illustrates the preferred embodiment of

FIG. 1

with the blades


16


in the closed position. For ease of illustration, blades stiffeners


12


are shown aligned with actuator bracket


14


. However, though skilled in the art will recognize that actuator bracket


14


does not have to be aligned with blades stiffeners


12


. While only one blade stiffener


12


is shown attached to each damper blade


16


, the number of blade stiffeners


12


can vary.




The damper


10


can also be automatically reset to the open position shown in

FIG. 1

, once temperatures have declined to an acceptable level. In the case of a damper


10


which is actuated by pneumatic pressure, an air input line controlled by the reset circuitry would be used to restore the pneumatic pressure.




In

FIG. 4

, a side cutaway view of an alternative preferred embodiment is shown. In this embodiment, the powered actuator uses electric motor


40


in place of the pneumatic actuator


30


. Electric motor


40


is preferably a stepper motor which allows more precise position control of the damper blades


16


.




When stepper motor


40


is activated, it rotates threaded shaft


28


which in turn moves angled bracket


14


which then moves damper blades


16


from an open to a closed position, or vice versa. In addition, the stepper motor


40


may be used to partially open or close the damper blades


16


. This is an advantage over the pneumatic actuator in that when the damper


10


is partially opened or closed under precision control of the stepper motor


40


, the air flow through the damper can modulated. In large buildings, a central computer can use remote sensors to regulate air flow throughout the building by independently controlling each damper


10


.




Stepper motor


40


may be attached to the damper frame.


18


by any suitable means, such as in the same manner that the pneumatic actuator


30


of the previous embodiment was attached to damper frame


18


.




With respect to

FIG. 4

, it should be noted that there are different options with regard to the lead screw nut.




One option is to just fasten it to the brace


14


. Another option is to have it be in two pieces, i.e., split so that it can be released by spring pressure. In other words, the two pieces can come apart, allowing a spring to close the damper.




The third option is to retain the outside of the nut and again have a release mechanism which gets rid of the retention mechanism so that the nut can fly up or spin. The release can be either a bi-metal or a solenoid device.





FIG. 5

is a cutaway side view of the preferred embodiment of

FIG. 4

shown with the damper blades


16


in the closed position. The stepper motor


40


has rotated threaded shaft


28


which in turn has raised angled bracket


14


. When angle bracket


14


is raised, members


20


, which are connected to angle bracket


14


at pivot points


24


and interconnected to damper blades


16


at pivot points


22


, pull damper blades


16


upward into the closed position.




In this electrically controlled version of my invention, the shaft


28


rides with a lead screw nut in the bracket


14


. The shaft may engage limit switches for full open and full closed to turn the motor off. Here, the override is by a heat sensitive switch with a nine volt battery on each side. When the heat actuates, it opens the circuit, thereby reversing polarity and signaling the apparatus to close the damper. The electric lead screw actuator damper must be driven back in order to close it. The travel control switches stop travel and arm the reverse D.C. current.




Note in

FIG. 5

a bearing is positioned at the end of the lead screw because the lead screw is the same size and stays there constantly and just turns. The nut rides up and down on the lead screw. If the nut is welded to the brace, then the device is useful for modulating.




The lead spring, as shown in

FIG. 5

, is used to force the blades closed. However, for modulating, such a screw is unnecessary. It is only useful when you use one of the other options for mounting the nut, so that the damper can be either in an opened or closed position. Also note that the opened position might be open only to a certain degree.




The angle of the threads on the lead screw must be such that the nut will not ride on its own because of associated pressure. Rather, the angle must be such as to be precise in positioning the nut.




In the case of power failure, it is desirable to have the nut released from the lead screw. This can be accomplished, for example, by a solenoid attached to one-half of the nut. When the power comes on, the solenoid retracts that half so that the nut is in disengagement from the lead screw. Thus, there are three distinct conditions: (1) when the power is always on and the solenoid is always engaged and the damper is powered to a closed position, or opened for a modulated position; (2) when you want to have the damper close automatically, such as by the spring. In that condition, the solenoid removes the half nut whether the motor is actually running or not at that moment; (3) to simply have the solenoid impinge upon the outside of the nut to keep it from turning. In the preferred embodiment, the angle of the threads is steeper, so the nut can turn more freely and indeed it is even preferable to have the nut mounted on the bearing for that purpose.





FIG. 6

is a top plan view of the preferred embodiment of FIG.


4


. Only two damper blades


16


are shown, and each damper blade


16


has only a single blade stiffener


12


. The damper blades


16


may vary in size. As a practical matter, commercially available dampers typically have damper blade


16


sizes which vary from 16 to 24 inches.





FIGS. 7A and 7B

illustrate other preferred embodiments of the invention which remotely control operation of the powered damper


10


. In

FIG. 7A

, a remote sensor


42


is attached to damper


10


via hard wiring


44


. When remote sensor


42


detects heat or smoke, it signals the power actuator


30


or


40


in damper


10


via wires


44


. Damper


10


then closes to prevent smoke or fire from passing through damper


10


. By locating sensor


42


at a distance from damper


10


, damper


10


can close well in advance of the arrival of the smoke or the fire. The sensors can be in or out of the air duct.





FIGS. 7A and 7B

show fire in the duct, but it should be noted that the wire might be outside the duct.

FIG. 7A

also shows an electric heat-actuated switch to control the motor relative to a smoke control system.





FIG. 7B

illustrates another preferred embodiment of the invention. In this embodiment, the remote sensor


42


includes a radio transmitter


50


. When the sensor


42


detects smoke or fire, it signals a receiver


52


which is attached to the damper


10


. The receiver


52


notifies power actuator


30


or


40


(depending on the embodiment) which, in turn, closes the damper


10


. Those skilled in the art will recognize that while the term radio is used, any suitable wireless communications technology may be used to implement this function. This embodiment eliminates the signal wire


44


. This can be important because, depending on the location of a fire, the wiring may be damaged by fire before the remote sensor


42


detects the smoke or fire.




All the previous embodiments discussed control of the dampers


10


by powered actuators


30


or


40


for use in fire control situations. However, there are other reasons to control closure of dampers


10


. For example, in manufacturing environments workers may be exposed to toxic fumes from a wide variety of sources. Specialized sensors of any type may be used in the manner described previously to protect workers or occupants of buildings from dangerous fumes which may have nothing to do with fire. In the case of toxic fumes, early detection of the fumes, along with rapid and secure closure of the dampers


10


, can be extremely important in terms of safety.




In addition, all of the dampers


10


in a given location may be controlled by a central computerized system (not shown) that may use a variety of sensor types including fire, smoke, toxic fumes, vibration (e.g. for use in earthquake prone areas), etc. In addition to centrally controlling the dampers


10


in emergency situations, a central computer can also be used to control damper


10


operation for the purpose of regulating ventilation in a building during normal use. The embodiment which uses a stepper motor


40


is particularly useful for this activity since it allows for precision control of the position of the damper blades


16


.





FIGS. 7A-B

illustrate the damper


10


installed in a horizontally oriented duct


46


. However, the damper


10


can just as easily be installed in a vertically oriented duct


46


, or one that is oriented in a variety of directions. This provides an advantage over gravity powered or spring powered dampers in that the orientation of the damper does not affect its performance.




In

FIG. 8

, an optional radiation blanket


55


is illustrated. The radiation blanket


55


is attached to the surface of the damper blades


16


. The radiation blanket


55


insulates the damper blades


16


from heat and helps to prevent deformity of the damper blades


16


. The radiation blanket


55


can be fabricated from any suitable material which is resistant to the high temperatures found in a fire condition. This works best when the metal blades are exposed to the heat, rather than the insulation


55


.





FIG. 9

is a side view that illustrates an alternative preferred embodiment in which the travel limit switches


66


are used to prevent the actuator


40


from attempting to move the damper blades


16


beyond preset damper blade travel limits. They may be hard wired as at


75


,


76


. Travel limit switches


66


prevent damage to the damper blades


16


which may have otherwise occurred if the w actuator


40


erroneously attempted to force the damper blades


16


beyond their intended travel limits. The travel limit switches


66


are electrically connected to the actuator


40


controls in the preferred embodiment. They may be enclosed, as shown, with the motor in a motor frame


67


. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that a variety of methods can be used to implement this switching system. The motor may be twelve volt D.C.





FIG. 10

illustrates another alternative embodiment in which a thermal locking mechanism is used to prevent the damper


10


from opening in high temperature conditions. Damper blades


16


are shown pressed against damper blade stops


68


. The damper blades


16


are locked in the closed position by a thermal lock


70


. In the preferred embodiment, thermal lock


70


is fabricated from a bi-metallic strip that is attached to damper frame


18


. In low temperatures, thermal lock


70


rests flat against the wall of damper frame


18


. In that situation, damper blades


16


are free to open and close without interference from thermal lock


70


. However, in high temperature conditions the damper blades


16


will be closed by actuator


40


and press against damper blade stops


68


. As the temperature increases, thermal lock


70


bends due to the different expansion rates in metals used to form the bi-metallic strip


70


. Once heated, the bi-metallic strip extends outward from the damper frame into the travel path of damper blades


16


and prevents them from moving back to the open position. An advantage using thermal lock


70


is that it provides an extra measure of protection by ensuring that the damper


10


cannot open in high temperature conditions.




From what has been described, it will be appreciated that I have provided a novel butterfly powered damper which can be round, oval or rectangular in configuration; has a two direction lead screw or actuating shaft that holds the damper in open, closed or intermediate positions; is responsive to close or open positions by a thermal switch; is easily adjustable to set power and stroke for various size dampers; and is computer driven compatible.




From what I have disclosed, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that, in accordance with my invention, there are at least four dampers described: electric and pneumatic butterfly, electric multi-blade and another electric butterfly which is a diffuser mounted type (for room temperature and air volume control). In particular, it would be simpler to install a linear motorized (multi-blade or butterfly) modulating exhaust damper for pressure control, while the diffuser mounted damper more readily controls temperature and volume. The use of the smoke/fire safety dampers is a novel heating, ventilating and air conditioning methodology which also would add pressurization and eliminate the current practice that is supposed to control room temperature (but does not in reality know what the room conditions are). In other words, the safety products would do all the heating, ventilating and air conditioning functions and replace the current means of doing them. The systems can be pressure, temperature, volume and smoke or any combination of these. The pressure systems can be normal building pressure differential for the control of the environment and fire and smoke emergency systems. There can also be the stairwell or escape route pressurization. Also, there are pressurization sub-systems such as in operating rooms where the contaminants are kept out, or unfriendly environments where the contaminants are kept in.




While the invention has been described with respect to a preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in detail may be made without departing from the spirit, scope, and teaching of the invention. For example, the material used to fabricate the damper may be anything suitable for the intended use in conditions of potential fire, smoke, or toxic fumes. The size and shape of the damper may also vary. The number of blades may vary in size, shape or orientation.



Claims
  • 1. A powered damper assembly mounted within a duct, comprising:a butterfly damper, further comprising: a damper frame; and damper blades pivotally attached to the damper frame such that the damper has an open position to allow air flow therethrough and a closed position to prevent air flow through the damper frame; a powered actuator cycling means attached to the damper, comprising a pneumatic actuator having a shaft means axially movable within the duct toward and away from the blades in response to pneumatic pressure changes; a source of pneumatic pressure connected to the pneumatic actuator; means to change the level of pneumatic pressure; and opposing pressure means set in opposition to the pneumatic pressure source and providing opposing pressure such that a change in the level of pneumatic pressure in relation to the opposing pressure means will result in axial movement of the movable shaft means; and said shaft means, attached at one end to the pneumatic actuator and attached at its other end to the damper blades, such that the powered actuator cycling means can move the shaft means axially and cause the damper blade to move and cycle between an open position and a closed position by varying the pneumatic pressure.
  • 2. A powered damper assembly, as in claim 1, further comprising: a first blade travel switch attached to the movable shaft such that it notifies the powered actuator when the movable shaft has moved the damper blades to the open position; anda second blade travel switch attached to the movable shaft such that it notifies the powered actuator when the movable shaft has moved the damper blades to the closed position.
  • 3. A powered damper assembly, as in claim 1, further comprising a thermal lock, the thermal lock attached to the damper assembly such that it does not restrict movement of the damper blades in normal operating conditions, and further attached to the damper assembly such that in high temperature conditions caused by fire, the thermal lock prevents the damper blades from moving from the closed to the open position.
  • 4. A method of controlling air flow through a damper mounted in a duct by opening and closing a butterfly damper having blades and a frame, by means of a powered damper actuator, comprising the steps of:pivotally attaching the damper blades to the damper frame such that the damper has an open position to allow air flow therethrough and a closed position to prevent air flow therethrough; attaching, within the duct, a powered actuator means having a pneumatic assembly to the damper frame and blades for moving the blades; attaching, within the duct, a movable shaft means at one end to the pneumatic assembly and at its other end to the damper blades such that upon activation by the pneumatic assembly, the movable shaft means is moved axially within the duct and moves the damper blades from an open position to a closed position; whereby the damper is closed by the powered actuator.
  • 5. A method, as in claim 4, including the additional step of connecting a sensor to the powered actuator, the sensor having means to control activation of the powered actuator to control opening or closing of the damper when a sensed condition indicates that the damper should be opened or closed;whereby the sensor controls air flow through the damper.
  • 6. A method, as in claim 5, including the additional step of connecting a sensor to the powered actuator, the sensor having means to control activation of the powered actuator to control the position of the blades of the damper between opening or closing of the damper when a sensed condition indicates that the damper should be partially opened or closed;whereby the sensor controls air flow through the damper.
  • 7. A method, as in claim 6, including the additional step of locating the sensor remotely from the damper;whereby the sensor can activate the damper before the sensed condition triggering activation of the powered actuator reaches the damper.
  • 8. The damper assembly of claim 1 wherein, the pneumatic assembly comprises,a bellows-type valve having a bladder, and a means to bleed-off the air in the bladder; and a spring in the actuator engaging a means to close the damper when the air is bled from the bladder.
  • 9. The damper assembly of claim 8 wherein the means to bleed off the air is a heat responsive means.
  • 10. The method of claim 4 wherein the additional steps of providing a bellows-type valve having a bladder and a means to bleed off the air in the bladder, as part of the pneumatic assembly; andproviding a spring in the actuator engaging a means to close the damper such that when air is bled from the bladder, the damper closes under the action of the spring.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation-in-part of my prior application, Ser. No. 09/379,032, filed Aug. 23, 1999 entitled POWER MODULATING LEAD SCREW ACTUATED BUTTERFLY BLADE ACTION DAMPER now U.S. Pat. No. 6,224,481 issued May 1, 2001; which application is incorporated herein as if fully set forth.

US Referenced Citations (6)
Number Name Date Kind
3697142 Fortier Oct 1972 A
4273283 Edwards Jun 1981 A
5456633 Choi Oct 1995 A
5462485 Kinkead Oct 1995 A
5590830 Kettler et al. Jan 1997 A
5971067 Rayburn et al. Oct 1999 A
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09/379032 Aug 1999 US
Child 09/733380 US