This application is a Submission under 35 U.S.C. § 371 for U.S. National Stage Patent Application of International Application Number PCT/NL2017/050359, filed Jun. 1, 2017, entitled ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM FOR CONVERTING WIND ENERGY INTO ELECTRIC ENERGY AND BUILDING WITH SYSTEM, which claims priority to Netherlands Application No. 2016888, filed Jun. 2, 2016, the entirety of both of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to an electric power system for converting wind energy into electric energy, and to a building, provided with such system. Systems for converting wind energy into electric energy are known as such, and generally comprise a wind-driven turbine, arranged on a mast, and comprising one or more blades, rotatable around a horizontal axis of rotation.
A disadvantage is that relatively a lot of space is required, which is not always available in for instance an urban environment. Moreover, a turbine with blades rotating about a horizontal axis is optimized for one wind direction only. Finally, they are in many cases not welcomed for esthetic reasons.
As an alternative, vertically oriented turbines exist, and are in general easier to integrate in an urban environment. Additionally, in general, the vertically oriented turbines are less sensitive to wind directions, and may be considered less offensive in an esthetical point of view. However, they are less efficient than the horizontal ones.
The US patent application 2013/334825 describes a number of configurations wherein vertical wind turbines are arranged in a tunnel, which tunnel subsequently catches the wind, concentrates it and drains it. The US patent application 2015/167636 and the Canadian application CA 2633876 show similar configurations with longer tunnels, having an expanding end section.
These are all examples of configurations according to the preamble of claim 1, and of prior art
However, there are still improvements to be made, in particular in the efficiency of the conversion of the wind energy to electric energy. It is therefore a goal of the present invention to propose an electric power system for converting wind energy into electric power, lacking the disadvantages of the prior art, or at least to provide a useful and/or attractive alternative to the prior art.
The invention thereto proposes an electric power system for converting wind energy into electric energy, comprising a duct for air, the duct comprising a floor, a first and a second wall, a roof, and the duct further defining an air inflow direction towards a turbine, the turbine having a diameter, and being located adjacent to or at least partially in the duct; and defining together with the duct an air outflow direction, as proposed by the prior art, but characterised in that an area free of pressure or turbulence increasing obstructing elements, extending in the resultant air outflow direction of the turbine over a length of at least one, and preferably more than two times the turbine diameter, measured from the centre of rotation of the turbine.
Although the configurations in the prior art patents mentioned above may work fine according to the descriptions in these patents, it is noticed by the present applicant that these are based on a theoretical expectation of a zero-backflow and no rotating turbine, which is purely a lab venture experiment.
According to the present invention it was found that for instance an expanding tunnel behind the turbine creates an increased pressure area with turbulent flow behind the turbine due to the work of the turbine itself and backflow of wind coming from outside the system into the back end of the funnel filling up the lower pressure area, and making the backend suction stop. This dramatically decreases the efficiency of the total flow. Prior art
According to the present invention, it was found that a higher yield and efficiency are obtained when there is either an empty space behind the turbine with no (expanding) funnel, because such funnel introduces backflow and local pressure increase, and that further improvements may be obtained when at least one element which spreads out the outflow is present.
It is therefore suggested by the present invention to have an area behind the turbine with at least one and preferable more than two times the turbine diameter free of these elements. In particular that is, an area free of an expanding duct or tunnel or funnel. This is in particular in the direction of the outflow.
The floor and the roof may in a practical embodiment for instance be oriented essentially perpendicular to the walls, so that a tube with an essentially square cross section is obtained, but multiple shapes and configurations are thinkable. The turbine may be any type of turbine, both with blades extending parallel to its axis of rotation, which may be vertical or horizontal. In such cases, the axis of rotation is also the center of rotation. The turbine may also have blades extending from its axis of rotation, which in that case will be horizontal. In this (propeller type) case the origin at the axis of rotation from where the blades extend will be the center of rotation.
The duct may have a throughput area that decreases downstream, for converging and thus focussing the air flow, causing a higher speed inside the duct, which is beneficial for the power transfer to the turbine. However, after the turbine, for an optimal air flow, that is an air outflow that as a whole encounters the least resistance, it is important that, no more pressure increase takes place. For that reason, at least one inventive aspect of the present invention is to provide an area free of pressure increasing obstructing elements, extending in the air outflow direction of the turbine over a length of at least one, and preferably more than two times the turbine diameter, and mostly preferred over a length of about three times the turbine diameter measured from the centre of rotation of the turbine. It has been determined by the applicant, that an area free of pressure increasing obstructing elements extending more than three times the turbine diameter does not improve the performance anymore.
Pressure increasing obstructing elements are to be understood as elements that cause at least a locally increased pressure, for instance because they impede a free air flow, or because they form a course of turbulence. A first example of pressure increasing elements is given in
A second example is given in US patent application 2013 334825, wherein an expanding funnel is present at the outlet side of the duct.
A third example is given in US patent application US 2015/167636, wherein a relatively long funnel is present. This funnel has a constant diameter, but due to the fact that the direction of the air flow behind the turbine is not parallel to the axis of the duct, such funnel acts as a pressure increasing element.
In many state of the art solutions, in particular those with turbines with vertical axis of rotation, walls are present around the turbine. Although they are generally considered as beneficial for creating a duct for every direction of incoming wind, when optimising for just one direction, according to the present invention they are found to have disadvantages.
In a further embodiment, the system according to the invention comprises a pressure decreasing element, such as a diffuser, arranged in the area free of pressure increasing obstructing elements. Such diffuser generally consists of sharp edged rounded blades (for instance having an almond or canoe shaped cross section), diverging an air flow without obstructing it. The beneficial effect of such diffuser is that it causes a (local) pressure decrease, which contributes to the desired optimal air flow.
In practice, the floor and the roof are oriented essentially horizontal in use, and the walls are oriented essentially vertical in use. A housing may be formed, being adapted for placement on the roof of a building. Said housing, and in particular the floor and the roof may be essentially rectangular, and in a particular embodiment square. In a preferred embodiment, the floor has a rectangular shape, with measurements of about 6×3 meters, wherein the axis of rotation of the turbine is oriented in the middle of one of the long sides.
The walls may be straight panels, put it is also thinkable that at least one of the walls is curved or folded, in order to reduce turbulence.
The combination of the floor, roof and walls forming the duct and the placement of the turbine with respect to the duct lead to a concentration of wind toward the turbine and as a result to an increased wind velocity through a venturi effect and increased power generation.
In a further embodiment, the walls extend under a respective first angle and second angle with respect to a line connecting their starting points, wherein the first angle lies between 45 and 90 degrees, and wherein the second angle lies between 25 and 65 degrees. This way the system according to the invention can be optimized for different dominant wind directions before it is actually mounted at site.
A duct can be thus formed that leads the wind towards one side of the turbine, while the other is—at least for wind coming from the same direction—covered by one of the walls. In a turbine with a vertical axis, it is important to concentrate the wind to one site in which the blades of the turbine are oriented such that they catch the maximum amount of wind, while in the other orientation, when they should move against the wind, they are covered as much as possible.
It has appeared, that optimal results are obtained when the first angle and the second angle are together 90 degrees.
In a further embodiment, the side of the floor facing the roof is inclined, going upward from its edge inwardly, over a distance smaller than the distance from the edge to the turbine.
An advantage of this feature is that it reduces turbulence at the roof edge so that the air flow is more steady at the turbine, because a smoother entrance to the system is created, decreasing turbulence and leading to a more stable operation of the system, in particular when the system according to the invention is applied on the roof of a (high) building, whereby part of the wind or air is deflected by the building facade and thus obtains a directional component upwardly.
The turbulence reducing effect can be further increased when also the side of the roof facing the floor is inclined, going downward from its edge inwardly, over a distance smaller than the distance from the edge to the turbine. In particular, the angle under which the roof is inclined toward the floor may be between 15 and 20 degrees.
The system according to the invention may further comprise at least one louver, extending between the first and the second wall, and inclined upwardly in a direction toward the turbine. The louver may for example be under an angle between 5 and 30 degrees with the horizontal.
Such louver also contributes to a more homogeneous direction of the incoming air directing on turbine. In a practical embodiment, the system according to the invention comprises two louvers, wherein a first louver, arranged above the floor, is inclined at an angle between 20 and 30 degrees, and a second louver, arranged between the fist louver and the roof, is inclined at an angle between 5 and 15 degrees.
In a further aspect of the present invention, the roof extends over the floor in a direction away from the turbine.
This has the advantage of capturing air with an upward component, but also enlarges the roof surface, which may be beneficial for further purposes, for instance for placing solar panels on top of the roof of the system. The duct may in that case be configured for guiding air along the bottom side of the solar panels, for cooling the latter.
The direction from the edge of the floor to the edge of the roof may extend at an angle between 5 and 20, and in particular between 8 and 12 degrees from a direction perpendicular to the plane in which the roof or the floor lays. It has appeared that with these angles, optimum points of catching mass flow from façade are obtained.
Another aspect of the present invention is that the cross section of the duct decreases in a direction toward the turbine. Herewith, locally a higher air speed is obtained, which leads to a higher rotational speed of the turbine for a given wind force, and thus to a higher power generation. Preferably the cross section decreases between 1 and 3 times.
A further aspect of the invention comprises a deflector, arranged between the first wall and the second wall. The deflector may be movable. Herewith, instead of placing the walls in different angles, similar effect can be reached by placing a deflector before the turbine. The blade is, coming towards the edge of the building protected from the wind.
The invention also relates to a building, provided with a system according to any of the preceding claims, in particular wherein the system is placed at the edge of the building roof.
The invention will now be elucidated into more detail with respect to the following figures, wherein:
Finally, it is visible in
In both
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2016888 | Jun 2016 | NL | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/NL2017/050359 | 6/1/2017 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/012964 | 1/18/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3302552 | Walsh | Feb 1967 | A |
3994621 | Bogie | Nov 1976 | A |
4017205 | Bolie | Apr 1977 | A |
4057270 | Lebost | Nov 1977 | A |
4191505 | Kaufman | Mar 1980 | A |
4237384 | Kennon | Dec 1980 | A |
4269563 | Sharak et al. | May 1981 | A |
4396843 | Martinez Parra | Aug 1983 | A |
4415814 | Martinez | Nov 1983 | A |
4433544 | Wells et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4945693 | Cooley | Aug 1990 | A |
5381048 | Baird | Jan 1995 | A |
5394016 | Hickey | Feb 1995 | A |
5447412 | Lamont | Sep 1995 | A |
5852331 | Giorgini | Dec 1998 | A |
6147415 | Fukada | Nov 2000 | A |
6210792 | Seethamraju | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6582291 | Clark | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6674181 | Harbison | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6765309 | Tallal, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6841894 | Gomez Gomar | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6870280 | Pechler | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6877948 | Cutcher | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6911744 | Roskey | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6984899 | Rice | Jan 2006 | B1 |
D516581 | Gomez Gomar | Mar 2006 | S |
7315093 | Graham, Sr. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
8210792 | Suma | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20020006334 | Szpur | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030133782 | Holter | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040130161 | Gomez Gomar | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20060275105 | Roberts et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070217918 | Baker et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222225 | Mahoney | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070274830 | Flores Lumbreras | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20090095339 | Nightingale | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20130119661 | Pringle | May 2013 | A1 |
20130334825 | Roter | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140183865 | Poutchkov | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150167636 | Al-Garni | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2633876 | Dec 2009 | CA |
19828324 | Dec 1999 | DE |
19956064 | May 2001 | DE |
0867615 | Sep 1998 | EP |
1985847 | Oct 2008 | EP |
2825769 | Sep 2013 | EP |
2269859 | Feb 1994 | GB |
2500199 | Sep 2013 | GB |
2003035252 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2007303459 | Nov 2007 | JP |
9904163 | Jan 1999 | WO |
2013136060 | Sep 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Nov. 3, 2017, for corresponding International Application No. PCT/NL2017/050359; International Filing Date: Jun. 1, 2017 consisting of 8-pages. |
Labarre, Suzanne, “Harvesting the Wind,” Metropolis Magazine, May 2009. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jan. 20, 2011, for corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2010/038164; International Filing Date: Jun. 10, 2010 consisting of 7-pages. |
EP Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC dated Feb. 16, 2022, for corresponding European Application No. 17734505.5; consisting of 6-pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200325872 A1 | Oct 2020 | US |