1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to an electric power tool in which a hydraulic pressure generator generates a plurality of impacts in one revolution thereof and a motor control method of the electric power tool.
2. Background Art
An electric power impact fastening tool as an electric power tool generally has a mechanism for generating one impact force per one revolution of a hydraulic pressure generator. (Refer to Patent Document 1.) In the electric power tool, a brushless DC motor is directly connected to an oil pulse unit to prevent occurrence of large vibration and reaction. (Refer to Patent Document 2.)
On the other hand, as an impulse wrench which is a hydraulic pressure power tool, there is a tool in which two impact forces per one revolution of a hydraulic pressure generator driven by compressed air (which will be hereinafter also called “two impacts per one revolution”). (Refer to Patent Document 3.) The tool of “two impacts per one revolution” generates a small torque and multiple impacts, thus a screwdriver, etc, is prevented from being away from a screw, etc. (which will be hereinafter called “come out”), at its operation time and an operation efficiency becomes good.
That is, a tool of “two impacts per one revolution” can perform a smooth fastening operation and a usability is good.
Patent Document 1: US2009/0133894
Patent Document 2: JP-A-2006-102826
Patent Document 3: JP-A-4-111779
A tool adopting the “two impacts per one revolution” as in Patent Document 3 is used for operations in which a rotation speed is small assuming a light load as compared with a tool of “one impact per one revolution”. The reason is that: if the tool of “two impacts per one revolution” and the tool of “one impact per one revolution” have the same impact mechanism in capability, one impact force of the tool of “two impact per one revolution” becomes half as compared with one impact force of the tool of “one impact per one revolution”, and an impact frequency of the tool of “two impact per one revolution” becomes twice of an impact frequency of the tool of “one impact per one revolution”. That is, in the tool of “two impact per one revolution”, an impact failure may occur because the impact frequency becomes high in a high load operation and responsibility of a hydraulic pressure generation mechanism worsens, etc. Here, the impact frequency means a frequency in impulse by oil compression of the hydraulic pressure generator.
One or more embodiments of the invention provide an electric power tool for suppressing continuation of an impact failure in a type in which a hydraulic pressure generator makes one revolution to produce a plurality of impacts, and a motor control method of the electric power tool.
In accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention, an electric power tool is provided with: a motor; a hydraulic pressure generator driven by the motor and configured to generate a plurality of impacts in one revolution thereof; an impact angle detector configured to detect an impact angle in one impact of the hydraulic pressure generator; an electric current detector configured to detect an electric current applied to the motor; a determination unit configured to determine an impact failure based on the impact angle and the electric current detected by the impact angle detector and the electric current detector; and a rotation controller configured to decrease a rotation speed of the motor when the determination unit determines the impact failure.
Moreover, in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention, in an electric power tool in which a hydraulic pressure generator driven by a motor generates a plurality of impacts in one revolution thereof, the motor is controlled by: detecting an impact angle in one impact of the hydraulic pressure generator; detecting an electric current applied to the motor; determining an impact failure based on the detected impact angle and the detected electric current; and decreasing a rotation speed of the motor when the impact failure is determined.
In the above electric power tool and its motor control method, an impact failure is determined based on the impact angle in one impact of the hydraulic pressure generator and the applied electric current proportional to the torque of the motor and the rotation speed of the motor is decreased when an impact failure is detected, so that a continuation of impact failure is suppressed. That is, according to the power electric tool and its motor control method of the embodiments of the invention, the impact failure is prevented as described above and thus an operation efficiency becomes good and a smooth fastening operation can be performed and the usability of the power electric tool becomes good.
Other aspects and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description, the drawings and the claims.
An electric power tool and its motor control method of a first embodiment of the invention is described based on an example of an oil pulse driver of multiple impacts per revolution (in the example, two impacts per revolution) shown in
(Schematic Configuration of Oil Pulse Driver)
As shown in
(Configuration Concerning Hydraulic Pressure Pulse Generation Mechanism)
The configuration concerning the hydraulic pressure pulse generation mechanism will be discussed based on
As shown in
(1) to (5) of
(Configuration Concerning Control System of Oil Pulse Driver)
The oil pulse driver includes a battery 12, a motor driver 13, a motor 14, and a CPU 30, as shown in
As shown in
The reason why the motor 14 is a brushless motor is as follows: The brushless motor has small moment of inertia of a rotor as compared with a brush motor and thus if the hydraulic pressure pulse generation mechanism is applied to the type of two impacts per revolution, a change in the rotation speed of the motor is also small. That is, in the brushless motor, a change in the rotation speed caused by load variation is large output, but if the hydraulic pressure pulse generation mechanism is of the type of two impacts per revolution, load variation is small and thus a change in the rotation speed caused by load variation is also small.
(Operation of Embodiment)
Processing concerning an impact control mode will be discussed based on a flowchart shown in
On the other hand, an impact failure can occur when the impact frequency is a given value or more, for example, 50 (times/s) or more. At this time, the angle advanced by one impact becomes small as compared with normal impact. That is, as shown in
Therefore, an impact failure occurs when the advance angle per impact (which will be hereinafter also called impact angle) is small and the consumption electric current is small (namely, the load on the motor 14 is light). In the embodiment, an impact failure is determined by the impact angle and by whether or not the consumption electric current is equal to or less than a threshold value. When an impact failure occurs, the rotation speed of the motor 14 increases and the consumption electric current also becomes small and thus the impact failure continues.
(Impact Control Mode)
At step 100 shown in
At step 104, the CPU 30 determines whether or not the impact angle detected at step 102 is equal to or less than a threshold value based on the threshold value read from the memory 32, for example, 60 degrees. If the determination at step 104 is NO, namely, the impact angle is more than the threshold value, the CPU 30 determines that, for example, a screw, etc., is struck against a material of a light load, and returns to step 100. If the determination at step 104 is YES, namely, the impact angle is equal to or less than the threshold value, the CPU 30 goes to step 106 and the electric current detection section 34 of the CPU 30 detects consumption electric current Iad of the motor 14.
At step 108, whether or not the consumption electric current detected at step 106 is less than a threshold value, for example, 16A is determined. If the determination at step 108 is N, namely, the consumption electric current is equal to or more than the threshold value, the load on the motor 14 is a predetermined load or more and thus the CPU 30 determines normal impact and returns to step 100. If the determination at step 108 is Y, namely, the consumption electric current is less than the threshold value, the load on the motor 14 is less than the predetermined load and thus the CPU 30 determines an impact failure and the rotation speed of the motor 14 is decreased in the voltage control section 36.
The processing of the routine is repeated while the motor 14 rotates. The processing flow of the program described above (see
According to the embodiment, an impact failure is determined based on the impact angle of one impact by the hydraulic pressure generator 24 and the load electric current proportional to the load torque of the motor 14 and if an impact failure is detected, the rotation speed of the motor 14 is decreased and thus continuation of impact failure is suppressed. That is, according to the embodiment, impact failure is prevented as described above and thus operation efficiency becomes good and smooth fastening operation can be performed and the usability of the oil pulse driver 10 becomes good. According to the embodiment, two impacts per revolution is small torque multiple impacts and thus come out is prevented.
For impact at the fastening time of a 90-mm screw, as shown in
Further, the voltage control section 36 may cause the motor driver 13 to output the drive electric current corresponding to the optimum rotation speed of the motor 14 based on the electric current input to the electric current detection section 34 and the voltage input to the voltage control section 36. In this case, rotation of the motor is not affected by the voltage of the battery 12 shown in
An electric power tool and its motor control method of a second embodiment of the invention will be discussed below with a block diagram of an oil pulse driver shown in
A CPU 40 of a rotation controller includes nonvolatile memory 42, an electric current detection section 44, and a rotating speed controller 46 and controls the whole operation of the oil pulse driver 10 shown in
As shown in
The rotating speed controller 46 may compute the target rotation speed based on the load electric current of the motor 14 input to the electric current detection section 44 and the voltage of a battery 12 and may compute motor output voltage according to the difference between the computed target rotation speed and the electric current rotation speed and may output the motor output voltage to the motor driver 13. In this case, the rotating speed controller 46 controls so that the rotation speed of the motor 14 becomes the target rotation speed by PI control (proportional-plus-integral control), for example. That is, the motor drive voltage is not directly computed based on load electric current and the target rotation speed may be once computed based on the load electric current of the motor 14 and the voltage of the battery and finally the motor output voltage may be computed based on the difference between the numbers of revolutions described above.
The rotation speed of the motor 14 is detected based on inverse striking voltage of the rotating motor 14 and rotation sensor (hall sensor, encoder), for example. Other components and functions and effects are the same as those of the first embodiment.
In each embodiment described above, the electric power tool is the oil pulse driver of two impacts per revolution by way of example, but the invention can also be applied to thread fastening power electric tools of an oil pulse driver of three or more impacts per revolution, other impact drivers, etc., for example. The invention can also be applied to a power electric tool using a commercial power supply as a power supply.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
P. 2009-092692 | Apr 2009 | JP | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4249117 | Leukhardt et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
5014793 | Germanton et al. | May 1991 | A |
5154242 | Soshin et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5563482 | Shaw et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5914882 | Yeghiazarians | Jun 1999 | A |
6479958 | Thompson et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6836614 | Gilmore | Dec 2004 | B2 |
20020050364 | Suzuki et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030196824 | Gass et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050205274 | Bogue | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060081386 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20090133894 | Mizuhara | May 2009 | A1 |
20100147545 | Hirt et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4-111779 | Apr 1992 | JP |
2006-102826 | Apr 2006 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100252287 A1 | Oct 2010 | US |