This patent application relates to electric vehicle charging.
A single turn, wire loop antenna in an electric vehicle receives energy wirelessly from a charging station source external to the vehicle, such as from a Radio Frequency (RF) emitter. The RF emitter may transmit energy also using a single turn, wire loop antenna that is somewhat smaller in diameter than the loop antenna in the vehicle. The use of RF loop antennas to both transmit and receive power greatly reduces the need to precisely align the vehicle with a charging station. The arrangement thus has distinct advantages over conventional inductive charging systems that use inductive coils.
The description below refers to the accompanying drawings, of which:
As shown in
In one implementation, vehicle loop antenna 100 may be a 0.25 inch metal pipe approximately 3 feet in diameter. The vehicle loop antenna 110 may be parasitically fed power from the charging antenna 210.
The charging loop antenna 210 may have a somewhat smaller diameter than the vehicle loop antenna 110, such as between 0.5 and 1 foot. In preferred embodiments, the charging loop antenna is at least three times smaller than the vehicle antenna 210. Having the parasitically fed vehicle antenna 210 somewhat larger in diameter than the charging antenna 110 reduced the need for critical alignment between the charging station 200 and the vehicle 100.
The charging antenna 210 may be actively fed from the amplifier 212 such as via a microstrip connection.
In one embodiment, energy is transferred from the charging loop antenna 210 to the vehicle loop antenna 110 at a radio frequency near 50 MHz; this may preferably be within one of the unlicensed radio bands in the 49 MHz range. However, operation at other radio frequencies is possible.
For RF transmission in or near 50 MHz, one expects a transmit antenna 210 with such small dimensions (between 0.5 and 1 foot) to be a relatively inefficient radiator; therefore its signal strength in the far field (more than a couple of feet away) would be significantly reduced. However, one potential advantage of this arrangement is that a floor or other components of the vehicle 100 above the vehicle loop antenna 110, if formed of primarily metal or other conductive surfaces, will naturally act as a radio frequency shield. The vehicle 100 itself can thus also serve to attenuate the radio frequency energy emitting from charging antenna 210 from leaking into the surrounding area.
The metallic floor of the vehicle, closely spaced to the receiving loop 110 also acts a ground plane and thus as an RF mirror to reflect energy in the 49-50 MHz frequency range. This mirror image acts to further increase efficiency.
In many implementations, it is desirable to reduce the amount of power reflected back into the transmitter amplifier 212, in other words, to minimize the Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR). However the VSWR will be different for different positions of the charging loop 210 and vehicle loop 110 with respect to one another. Thus a VSWR meter 226 may be placed on the transmit side to detect RF energy reflected back from the charging loop 210. The VSWR meter 226 output feeds a controller 230 that then controls some attribute of the amplifier 212, such as its output impedance. Any known analog or digital control techniques may be utilized for this feedback control of the transmit VSWR.
Automatic tuner 112 on the vehicle side may use any known analog or digital techniques for controlling an adjustable impedance disposed in or adjacent to vehicle loop antenna 110. The automatic antenna tuner 112 further permits the position of the charging station loop antenna 210 to be somewhat independent of the exact position of the vehicle 100. The automatic receive tuner 112 thus eliminates what might otherwise be a cumbersome, difficult to achieve, highly accurate positioning required of charging systems that use multiple turn inductive coils. Such inductive coils used in prior systems must be congruently aligned with one another to operate properly.
Charging station loop 210 is thus completely enclosed by vehicle loop 110 and thus aligned even when the two loops 110, 120 are offset by 18 inches or even more. However, it is expected that energy may even be transferred when the vehicle loop 110 merely overlaps and does not completely encompass charging station loop 210.
The charging station 200 components may be packaged in a number of different ways. They may, for example, be installed in the floor of residential garage or a space in which electric vehicles 100 are often parked. Components of charging station 200 may also be placed within a portable container such as a flexible rubber mat. The portable mat can then be roll out on the ground in a location where a connection 216 to an AC power source is available. The charging station 200 components may also be installed within pavement near a stop light, stop sign, or along other road sections to permit the vehicle to be charged while it is in use.
In some implementations it is envisioned that the same vehicle loop antenna 110 may also serve to receive broadcast signals and connect those to other components such as FM radio (not shown in the drawings.)
There may be some concern with transmission of RF power at sufficient levels to charge the batteries 116 in a reasonable time. One particular popular model of electronic vehicle is the Tesla Model X. The standard lithium-ion battery packs in that vehicle have a 60 kWh capacity to produce a range of 232 miles. If the amount of power transmitted between the single turn wire loops 210 and 110 is at least a kilowatt for 10 hours this would provide approximately 1/6 the storage capacity of a Tesla X's battery, resulting in a range of 30.7 miles. If the arrangement can be designed to transfer 6 kW in the same 10 hour period, the batteries 116 would then be fully charged.
In certain environments a domestic pet, small wild animal, child, or other object may possibly walk or otherwise end up between wire loops 110 and 210. Additional circuitry can detect these condition(s) and safely shut down the charging station 200, as shown in
It is possible to use other techniques for detecting the presence of an object necessitating shut down of the transmitter. For example, an infrared camera operating at, say, a 4 micron wavelength, may be used to detect biological objects. An acoustic sensor may also detect the presence of objects.
In some cases it may be desirable for a human vehicle operator to safely remain in the vehicle during a wireless charging operation.
A parasitic power scavenging mode may also be implemented. Here, the same single turn loop 110 used for receiving wireless power from the charging station may be coupled to one or more RF filters 130 and thus resonated by ambient RF energy to charge batteries 116 while the vehicle 100 does not otherwise have access to a charging station 210. This may enable the vehicle itself to act as an antenna in a parasitic power scavaging mode. An effective area of 10 m2 at Ultra High Frequencies (UHF) can be estimated. In that scenario, at a distance of approximate half mile from a high-power UHF television station, the incident field might be about 4 w/m2 thus enabling a power scavaging charge rate of 40 W. In this mode, it may be preferable for the filter(s) 130 to tune to a relatively narrow frequency band (such as the bandwidth of the broadcast signal) and/or include acquisition circuitry (not shown) that can scan a range of frequencies and tune the filter(s) 130 to a frequency with a strong ambient received signal strength.
This application claims priority to a co-pending U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/454308 filed Feb. 3, 2017 entitled “ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING VIA RF LOOPS TO AVOID NEED FOR PRECISE ALIGNMENT WITH A WIRELESS CHARGING EQUIPMENT”, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62454308 | Feb 2017 | US |