This invention relates to a conductive webs and fabrics, and more particularly to a laminate web wherein at least a central layer is conductive. In some embodiments the central layer comprises a plurality of spaced, parallel conductors.
Electrical cables are known in the art. Electrical cables can be used for power transmission or for signal transmission, and the technology for each is well developed. For example, design choices for performance parameters for power transmission cables, including conductor size and insulation requirements are well known. Likewise, design choices for performance parameters for signal transmission cables, such as signal speed, impedance, and shielding level, are equally well known.
For either power cables or signal transmission cables, two basic cable types are known: round and flat. Round cables are formed by the twisting, or “cabling” together of a plurality of individual insulated and/or shielded wires into an overall-jacketed cable having a generally round cross section. Flat cables are typically made by feeding a plurality of wires, each of which may be insulated and/or shielded (e.g., coaxial signal wires), into in a spaced apart, parallel arrangement, and held in such an arrangement by an overall jacket. Overall jackets for both round and flat cables are typically extruded on inline with the cable production.
In same cases, it is desirable to make a flat cable comprising flat conductors. In this type of cable the conductors themselves have a flat, generally rectangular cross section. Such cables find use in such applications as board-to-board interconnections for electronic equipment, for example. The relatively low profile and greater flex life (for dynamic applications) make flat conductor flat cables ideal for these and many other applications. Examples of flat conductors cables include those manufactured and marketed by Axon Cable and Interconnect as Axojump® flat flexible cables.
One drawback to known methods of forming flat cables is production speed, particularly with small gauge conductors (e.g., below 36 AWG equivalent). For high quality cables it is required that each of the conductors feeding into the cable be held at a uniform tension, and spacing must be carefully maintained. As conductor size decreases (i.e., AWG increases), this requirement becomes more critical, and high production speeds are more difficult to achieve.
In addition to the problems of forming flat cables described above, for known methods of making flat cables comprising flat conductors, cost is a major factor. For many reasons, including technical complexity and relatively low usage, flat conductors are more expensive than round conductors, for equivalent gauge size.
Accordingly, it would be desirable to have a method of economically manufacturing flat cables for electrical power or signal transmission.
Additionally, it would desirable to have a method of economically manufacturing flat cables comprising flat conductors.
An electrical cable of the present invention comprises a plurality of spaced, parallel flat conductors. Each of the plurality of flat conductors was previously integral with each immediately adjacent flat conductor. A dielectric material is holds the conductors in the spaced, parallel relationship. The dielectric material can be a polymer film, a nonwoven, or other polymer materials such as PTFE, or expanded PTFE.
The cable of the present invention is made by providing first and second webs of dielectric materials and a third sheet of conductive material. The first and second web materials are bonded to the third sheet of conductive material in a face-to-face layered relationship thereby forming a bonded laminate. The bonded laminate is then incrementally stretched to separate the sheet of conductive material in to spaced, parallel flat conductors.
While the specification concludes with claims pointing out and distinctly claiming the present invention, it is believed the same will be better understood by the following drawings taken in conjunction with the accompanying specification wherein like components are given the same reference number. Note that the Figures are not meant to represent relative scale and dimensions of any elements of the present invention.
As used herein, the term “film” or “polymer film” is used to describe liquid impervious thermoplastic polymer films as are known in the art. Such films are typically thin films supplied as webs. Typical materials for such films include, without limitation, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyester, and blends thereof. Such films can be rendered liquid pervious by known methods such as aperturing. Such films can also be microporous and/or “breathable” to permit gas and vapors to penetrate, while remaining essentially liquid pervious.
As used herein, the term “nonwoven web” is used in its plain meaning as understood in the art and refers to a web that has a structure of individual fibers or threads which are interlaid, but not in any regular, repeating manner. Nonwoven webs have been, in the past, formed by a variety of processes, such as, for example, meltblowing processes, spunbonding processes and bonded carded web processes.
As used herein, the term “microfibers” refers to small diameter fibers having an average diameter not greater than about 100 microns.
As used herein, the term “meltblown fibers”, refers to fibers formed by extruding a molten thermoplastic material through a plurality of fine, usually circular, die capillaries as molten threads or filaments into a high velocity gas (e.g., air) stream which attenuates the filaments of molten thermoplastic material to reduce their diameter, which may be to a microfiber diameter. Thereafter, the meltblown fibers are carried by the high velocity gas stream and are deposited on a collecting surface to form a web of randomly dispersed meltblown fibers.
As used herein, the term “spunbonded fibers” refers to small diameter fibers that are formed by extruding a molten thermoplastic material as filaments from a plurality of fine, usually circular, capillaries of a spinneret with the diameter of the extruded filaments then being rapidly reduced by drawing.
As used herein, the term “unitary web” refers to a laminate of two or more webs of material, including polymer films and nonwoven webs, that are sufficiently joined, such as by thermal bonding means, to be handled, processed, or otherwise utilized, as a single web.
As used herein, the term “polymer” generally includes, but is not limited to, homopolymers, copolymers, such as, for example, block, graft, random and alternating copolymers, terpolymers, etc., and blends and modifications thereof. Furthermore, unless otherwise specifically limited, the term “polymer” shall include all possible geometrical configurations of the material. These configurations include, but are not limited to, isotactic, syndiaotactic and random symmetries.
As used herein, the term “elastic” refers to any material which, upon application of a biasing force, is stretchable, that is, elongatable, at least about 60 percent (i.e., to a stretched, biased length, which is at least about 160 percent of its relaxed unbiased length), and which, will recover at least 55 percent of its elongation upon release of the stretching, elongation force. A hypothetical example would be a one (1) inch sample of a material which is elongatable to at least 1.60 inches, and which, upon being elongated to 1.60 inches and released, will recover to a length of not more than 1.27 inches.
Many elastic materials may be elongated by more than 60 percent (i.e., much more than 160 percent of their relaxed length), for example, elongated 100 percent or more, and many of these materials will recover to substantially their initial relaxed length, for example, to within 105 percent of their initial relaxed length, upon release of the stretch force. Such materials are denoted herein by the term “highly elastic” which refers to any material which upon application of a biasing force, is stretchable, that is, elongatable, at least about 200 percent (i.e., to a stretched, biased length, which is at least about 300 percent of its relaxed unbiased length), and which, will to within 105 percent of their initial relaxed length, upon release of the stretch force. Therefore, highly elastic materials are generally also elastic, but not all elastic materials are highly elastic.
As used herein, the term “nonelastic” refers to any material which does not fall within the definition of “elastic” above.
As used herein, the term “elongation to break” refers to the percent elongation a material exhibits under an applied tensile loading before complete break, i.e., complete failure in tension.
As used herein, the term “extensible” refers to any material which, upon application of a biasing force, is elongatable, at least about 25 percent without experiencing catastrophic failure. Catastrophic failure includes substantial tearing, fracturing, rupturing, or other failure in tension such that, if tested in a standard tensile tester, the failure would result in a sudden significant reduction in tensile force. As used herein, the term “highly extensible” refers to any material, which upon application of a biasing force is elongatable, at least about 100 percent without experiencing catastrophic failure.
As used herein, the term “machine direction” is used as is commonly known in the art, and refers to the longitudinal direction of a web material being processed. “cross-direction” is likewise used as is commonly known in the art, and refers to a direction orthogonal and in the same plane as the machine direction. In a finished article made from such webs, the terms machine direction and cross-direction refer to the respective directions of the precursor web, prior to forming into the finished article.
One embodiment of a flat cable of the present invention is shown in
The conductors 30 can be copper, aluminum, gold, silver, or other conductive metal, and are preferably at least partially tin plated copper. The conductor-to-conductor spacing, hereinafter referred to as the “pitch” can be varied as desired, up to the limit of the extensibility of the dielectric material 20 as described below. In general, the pitch can range from 0.50 mm to 2.44 mm. For example, the pitch can be 0.50 mm, 0.80 mm, 1.00 mm, 1.25 mm, 1.27 mm, 2 mm or 2.45 mm. Additionally, the pitch can be varied throughout the cable.
The total number of conductors 30 in the cable 10 is limited only by the size of the supply material and the apparatus dimensions, as described below. However, in general, the number of conductors can range from 2 to 1000.
As shown in
As shown in
If plated conductors, such as tin plated copper, are used, the process for making a cable 10 of the present invention also results in conductors 30 that are not fully plated. For reasons that will be apparent after disclosure of the method of making, the conductors 30 of the present invention have portions along their respective lateral edges 32 that do not have plating. While this is a result of the manufacturing process, it is not considered detrimental to the operation of the cables for power or signal transmission properties.
The cable 10 of the present invention can be electrically shielded by known methods. For example, as shown in
With reference to
The dielectric material 20 can be chosen from known materials supplied as films or webs. The dielectric material could be a woven fabric. Dielectric material 20 can be polyester, polyethylene, polypropylene, PVC, or other films. Representative films and their respective dielectric constants suitable for use in the present invention are listed in Table 1 below. A particularly preferred material is one that, upon incrementally stretching at a sufficient rate and/or temperature, exhibits a reduced density, and consequently, a reduced dielectric constant. For example, microporous films can be made by incrementally stretching talc filled polypropylene. Thus, the resulting dielectric constant is expected to be less than 2.6. Likewise, PTFE, once expanded to reduce its density, can have a dielectric constant of 1.3 to 1.8.
Preferably the dielectric materials 20 are sufficiently bonded to the conductor material prior to processing by the method disclosed below. By “sufficiently” is meant that the bond is strong enough to hold the conductor material 30 in place relative to the dielectric material 20 during processing of the cable 10 as described below. Otherwise, no particular bond type, bond strength, adhesive type, or adhesive level is considered limiting to the present invention. One particularly good dielectric material 20 is film grade polyethylene which, due to its thinness and relatively good dielectric properties, makes an excellent dielectric material for thin, lightweight, flat cables.
In another embodiment, rather than bonding the conductor material 30 to the dielectric material, the conductor material can be directly coated onto the dielectric material, such as by sputtering, vacuum deposition or other known means.
The dielectric material 20 can be in the form of nonwoven, expanded, foamed, or other air-containing materials, as long as the material has a higher elongation to break in at least one direction than the conductor material, and maintains sufficient integrity after processing as disclosed below to maintain adequate conductor spacing during further processing or use of the cable. “Adequate” conductor spacing depends on the end use of the cable. For example, for power cables, maintenance of precise conductor spacing is not critical, but for impedance-controlled signal cables, precise conductor spacing can be critical.
Dielectric material 20 can comprise nonwoven materials, which is the material shown on cable 10 in
In general, for nonwoven, foamed and expanded materials, the less polymer (and, conversely, the more air) in between conductors, the higher the signal speed of the electrical signal (i.e., the velocity of propagation). This well-known physical principal can be applied in the selection of the dielectric material 20 of the present invention. For example, for high-speed transmission of electrical signals, a low-dielectric constant material, such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE, dielectric constant=2.1), and preferably expanded PTFE (e.g., GORE-TEXT®, dielectric constant=1.3–1.9, available from W. L. Gore and Associates, Newark, Del., USA) can be used as the dielectric material 20. The expanded PTFE can be “etched”, using known techniques to facilitate bonding. Alternately, a calcium carbonate filled polyethylene (film grade, dielectric constant=2.4) can be used as the dielectric material. When stretched by the method of the present invention, such a material expands to form a lower density, microporous network, which results in a lower dielectric constant.
Bonding of the dielectric material 20 to the conductor prior to processing into cable 10 can be accomplished by known methods. In general, it is advantageous to use the minimum amount of adhesive sufficient to ensure adequate bonding of the conductors to the dielectric material, such that the electrical characteristics, such as signal fidelity, are not adversely affected. Specialty adhesives can be used, such as adhesives available from Lepercq, SA, Chassiux Cedex, France. Hot melt adhesives can also be used, such as H-2031 available from Ato-Findley, Wauwatosa, Wis.
The dielectric material 20 has a percent elongation to break value greater than that of the conductive sheet 130 as shown below. The conductive sheet 130 is transformed from an integral sheet into the individual conductors 30. If more than one dielectric layer is used, then at least one should have a percent elongation to break value greater than that of the conductor 30. In general, the integral conductor material 130 is supplied as a thin sheet or foil of conductive metal, such as a copper foil, which can have an elongation to break less than about 10%. The dielectric material can be a polymer material that is extensible or highly extensible, thereby exhibiting an elongation to break greater than 25%.
Thus, in one aspect, the present invention can be described as an electrical cable comprising a plurality of spaced, parallel flat conductors, each of the plurality of flat conductors having been previously integral with each immediately adjacent flat conductor. Of course, “previously integral” in this context means previously with respect to the process of forming the electrical cable from an integral web or sheet of metal. Thus, prior to forming into individual conductors, each conductor so formed was integral with adjacent conductors as a unitary, integral sheet or web. The term “previously integral” does not mean previously integral in an abstract sense of having been integral at an unidentified time in the past, as copper ore, for example.
Method of Making
Referring to
A first web 120 of relatively extensible dielectric material 20, is unwound from a supply roll 104 and travels in a direction indicated by the arrows associated therewith as the supply roll 104 rotates in the direction indicated by the arrows associated therewith. Likewise a second web 140 of relatively extensible web of relatively extensible dielectric material 20 (which can be the same or different type of dielectric material 20 from that which comes from supply roll 104) is unwound from supply roll 105. A conductive sheet 130, which can be a relatively inextensible (with respect to first and second webs 120, 140) metal sheet or web, is likewise drawn from supply roll 107. The three components pass through a nip 106 of the bond roller arrangement 108 formed by rollers 110 and 112. Conductive sheet 130 can be non-metal, such as a conductive polymer sheet, for example.
In one embodiment, both first and second webs 120, 140 comprise nonwoven materials, and are identical. The nonwoven material may be formed by known nonwoven extrusion processes, such as, for example, known meltblowing processes or known spunbonding processes, and passed directly through the nip 106 without first being bonded and/or stored on a supply roll. However, in a preferred embodiment, the nonwoven webs are consolidated webs commercially available on supply rolls.
In another embodiment, both first and second webs 120, 140 comprise polymer film materials, and are identical. The film material can be any of thin films known in the art for their electrical insulating or dielectric properties. For example, polyethylene, polyester, PVC and polyamide films can be used. Likewise, non-thermoplastic films, including PTFE films and expanded PTFE films can be used. In one embodiment, a PTFE web having a basis weight of about 60 gsm is used, and the temperature, pressure, and line speed of the incremental stretching system described below simultaneously expands the PTFE and separates the conductor sheet 130 into the spaced, parallel conductors 30 of cable 10.
The first and second web 120, 140 materials can be nonelastic, extensible, or highly extensible, and, under certain conditions can be elastic or highly elastic. The only restriction is that the first and second web 120, 140 materials do not elastically recover fully after the incremental stretching step described below. That is, once the conductive sheet material 130 has been processed into a plurality of spaced, parallel conductors, the first and second web 120, 140 materials should not elastically recover to the extent that the spaced conductors are no longer sufficiently spaced. In particular, adjacent conductors should not be touching. The first and second web 120, 140 materials may themselves be a multilayer material comprising, for example, at least one layer of a nonwoven web joined to at least one layer of a thermoplastic polymer film.
Referring to
One or both of the calendar roller 110 and the smooth anvil roller 112 can be heated and the temperature of either roller and the pressure between the two rollers may be adjusted by well known means to provide the desired temperature, if any, and pressure to effect bonding of the first and second webs 120, 140 to the conductive sheet 130 in a composite laminate. The laminate comprises the conductive sheet 130 “sandwiched” between first and second webs 120, 140.
The calendar roller 110 can be a patterned or smooth right circular cylinder of steel. Anvil roller 112, is likewise a smooth surfaced, right circular cylinder of steel.
Prior to passing through nip 106, adhesive can be applied to the first and second webs 120, 140, or to conductive sheet 130. As shown in
After passing through nip 106, the composite laminate passes through nip 130 formed by an incremental stretching system 132 employing opposed pressure applicators 134 and 136 having three-dimensional surfaces which at least to a degree are complementary to one another. It is the incremental stretching system 132 that separates the conductive sheet 130 into discrete, spaced, parallel conductors 30 of cable 10. This is because the first and second webs 120, 140 are relatively extensible, so that they extend during the incremental stretching, and remain extended to a sufficient degree to hold the conductors 30 in the discrete, spaced, parallel relationship. However, the conductive sheet 130 is relatively non-extensible, and separates into strips which make up the individual conductors 30 upon application of the incremental extension forces. The separation is smooth, uniform, and can be carried out at relatively high speeds suitable for commercial production.
Referring now to
The teeth of the respective rollers can be partially intermeshing. The degree to which the teeth on the opposing rolls intermesh is referred to herein as the “depth of engagement” or “DOE” of the teeth. As shown in
As the composite laminate passes through the incremental stretching system 132 it is subjected to tensioning in the CD or cross-machine direction causing the composite laminate to be extended in the CD direction. Thus, the mechanism of discrete conductor production is tensile separation, as opposed to shearing. Shearing of the conductors would not provide for conductor spacing, and would destroy the integrity of the dielectric layer. However, the stretching induced by the incremental stretching system 132 in effect “pulls apart” the conductive web or sheet 130 into the individual conductors 30. It can be seen that each individual flat conductor 30 was previously integral with each immediately adjacent flat conductor 30. As used herein the term “integral” is used to mean “one”, i.e., not made up of constituent parts joined together.
The pitch, conductor width, and spacing of conductors 30 is determined by the particular pitch, or distance between the apexes, of adjacent teeth 160 and 162 of rollers 134 and 136, respectively, the DOE, E, and the material properties of the webs 120, 130 and 140 of the composite laminate being incrementally stretched. Therefore, the examples listed below are considered exemplary, and not limiting.
The cable of the present invention, after processing as shown above, can be further processed to have additional shielding and/or jacketing components, as is known in the art. However, in one embodiment, the outer nonwoven dielectric materials are sufficient to be the outer jacketing materials as well. Such a cable is suitable for controlled environment applications, where fluid pervious, mechanically tough jacketing characteristics are not required.
The cable of the present invention finds use in industry, such as in automotive applications, including, for example for a steering wheel rotary connector, connections to control panels, such as in car radios, antennae connections, door cables, cables inside headliners, and other areas where low profile, flexible cables offer an advantage. The cable also finds use as a resistive heating element, useful, for example, for wrapping water pipes to prevent freezing. The cable can also find use in sensor materials or devices (e.g., pressure sensing fabrics), electrostatic discharge materials or devices, antennas, heat shielding, and conductive fabrics. Moreover, if a breathable dielectric material is used, cables of the present invention with nonwoven dielectric/insulation can be used in body-contacting electrical applications, where user comfort is desirable. For example, disposable diaper with sensors, or medical applications requiring skin contact with electrically conductive instrumentation can benefit by a clothlike, soft, breathable cable of the present invention.
The cable shown in
The laminate was then subjected to incremental stretching via the incremental stretching apparatus described above. The tooth pitch of each of the interengaging rollers was 0.060 inches, and the DOE was 0.085 inches. The laminate was processed through the incremental stretching apparatus by hand at approximately 10 feet per minute.
The resulting cable had 14 conductors 30, each approximately 1.5 mm wide, and spaced on a pitch of approximately 2 mm. Individual continuity tests were performed on each of the 14 conductors, confirming the integrity of each. Additionally, the regular spacing between adjacent conductors prevented unwanted contact between adjacent conductors.
While particular embodiments of the present invention have been illustrated and described, it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that various other combinations and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, rather than use two webs 120 and 140, it may be beneficial to simply use one of 120 or 140. The process would otherwise be identical, with the finished flat cable 10 only having a dielectric material on one side thereof. However, this may be sufficient for many applications, and it nevertheless can be further insulated, such as by extrusion of a polymer jacket. It is therefore intended to cover in the appended claims all such combinations and modifications that are within the scope of this invention.
This application is a divisional of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/886,894 (Case 8590), filed Jun. 21, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,730,622, which is a continuation-in-part and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/149,878 (Case 7897R2) filed Jun. 14, 2002 in the names of Curro et al., now U.S. Pat. No. 7,037,569 and was published as US Publication Number 2003/0028165A1 on Feb. 6, 2003; and which is a continuation-in-part and claims priority to prior application Ser. No. 09/584,676 (Case 7897R), filed May 31, 2000 in the names of Curro et al., now abandoned; and a continuation-in-part and claims priority to prior application Ser. No. 09/467,938 (Case 7897), filed Dec. 21, 1999 in the names of Curro et al., now U.S. Pat. No. 6,884,494.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2257428 | Ruegenberg | Sep 1941 | A |
2679887 | Doyle et al. | Jun 1954 | A |
2862251 | Kalwaites | Dec 1958 | A |
2896692 | Villoresi | Jul 1959 | A |
3081500 | Griswold et al. | Mar 1963 | A |
3081512 | Griswold | Mar 1963 | A |
3354022 | Dettre et al. | Nov 1967 | A |
3459609 | Hairabedian et al. | Aug 1969 | A |
3485706 | Evans | Dec 1969 | A |
3542634 | Such et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3574109 | Yoshikawa | Apr 1971 | A |
3597299 | Thomas et al. | Aug 1971 | A |
3681182 | Kalwaites | Aug 1972 | A |
3681183 | Kalwaites | Aug 1972 | A |
3695967 | Ross | Oct 1972 | A |
3695985 | Brock et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3728203 | Taylor | Apr 1973 | A |
3800364 | Kalwaites | Apr 1974 | A |
3802974 | Emmel | Apr 1974 | A |
3855046 | Hansen et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3860003 | Buell | Jan 1975 | A |
3881987 | Benz | May 1975 | A |
3927673 | Taylor | Dec 1975 | A |
3929135 | Thompson | Dec 1975 | A |
3949127 | Ostermeier et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3953638 | Kemp | Apr 1976 | A |
4000348 | Harlow | Dec 1976 | A |
4062993 | Seward | Dec 1977 | A |
4085502 | Ostman et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4101625 | Haley | Jul 1978 | A |
4116892 | Schwarz | Sep 1978 | A |
4135021 | Patchell et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4153664 | Sabee | May 1979 | A |
4207367 | Baker, Jr. | Jun 1980 | A |
4223059 | Schwarz | Sep 1980 | A |
4276336 | Sabee | Jun 1981 | A |
4285100 | Schwarz | Aug 1981 | A |
4333979 | Sciaraffa et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4342314 | Radel et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4349020 | Krikorian | Sep 1982 | A |
4355066 | Newman | Oct 1982 | A |
4404052 | Persson et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4414970 | Berry | Nov 1983 | A |
4418123 | Bunnelle et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4421812 | Plant | Dec 1983 | A |
4522863 | Keck et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4525407 | Ness | Jun 1985 | A |
4573991 | Pieniak et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4588630 | Shimalla | May 1986 | A |
4600620 | Lloyd et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4603069 | Haq et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4606964 | Wideman | Aug 1986 | A |
4609518 | Curro et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4629643 | Curro et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4657802 | Morman | Apr 1987 | A |
4695278 | Lawson | Sep 1987 | A |
4720415 | Vander Wielen et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4741944 | Jackson et al. | May 1988 | A |
4758297 | Calligarich | Jul 1988 | A |
4797310 | Barby et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4801482 | Goggans et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4808178 | Aziz et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4816025 | Foreman | Mar 1989 | A |
4840829 | Suzuki et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4847134 | Fahrenkrug et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4891258 | Fahrenkrug | Jan 1990 | A |
5116662 | Morman | May 1992 | A |
5143679 | Weber et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5151092 | Buell et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5156793 | Buell et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5167897 | Weber et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5204158 | Phillips et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5235132 | Ainsworth et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5250127 | Hara | Oct 1993 | A |
5260345 | DesMarais et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5268224 | DesMarais et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5320891 | Levy et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5338766 | Phan et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5376198 | Fahrenkrug et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5431991 | Quantrille et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5451219 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5518801 | Chappell et al. | May 1996 | A |
5536555 | Zelazoski et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5567501 | Srinivasan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5587225 | Griesbach et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5595567 | King et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5620779 | Levy et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623888 | Zafiroglu | Apr 1997 | A |
5626571 | Young et al. | May 1997 | A |
5628097 | Benson et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635290 | Stopper et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5658639 | Curro et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5662634 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5681302 | Melbye et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683374 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5683794 | Wadsworth et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5691035 | Chappell et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5714107 | Levy et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5733822 | Gessner et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5804021 | Abuto et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830555 | Srinivasan et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5846232 | Serbiak et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5851935 | Srinivasan et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5853881 | Estey et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5891544 | Chappell et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5906879 | Huntoon et al. | May 1999 | A |
5916661 | Benson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919411 | Rezai et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5965082 | Tietto | Oct 1999 | A |
6015605 | Tsujiyama et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6022607 | James et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025050 | Srinivasan et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026563 | Schilson | Feb 2000 | A |
6027593 | Lunt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6054202 | Takeuchi et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057024 | Mleziva et al. | May 2000 | A |
6086984 | DiMaggio, Jr. et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106925 | Palumbo | Aug 2000 | A |
6203654 | McFall et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6316104 | Kumakura | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6967178 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
20030148691 | Pelham et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 112 654 | Jul 1984 | EP |
0 127 483 | Oct 1989 | EP |
0 164 740 | Apr 1990 | EP |
0 432 755 | May 1995 | EP |
0 432 763 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 685 586 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0 687 757 | Dec 1995 | EP |
0 452 727 | Mar 1996 | EP |
0 758 543 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0 713 546 | Mar 1997 | EP |
0 677 284 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0 919 212 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0 945 251 | Sep 1999 | EP |
0 945 536 | Sep 1999 | EP |
0 955 159 | Nov 1999 | EP |
0 823 878 | Aug 2000 | EP |
08299385 | Nov 1996 | JP |
WO 9419179 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO 9610979 | Apr 1996 | WO |
WO 9711662 | Apr 1997 | WO |
WO 9747264 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9937476 | Jul 1999 | WO |
WO 9955273 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 9955532 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO 0076430 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0145616 | Jun 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040185736 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09886894 | Jun 2001 | US |
Child | 10149878 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10149878 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 10768364 | US | |
Parent | 09584676 | May 2000 | US |
Child | 09886894 | US | |
Parent | 09467938 | Dec 1999 | US |
Child | 09584676 | US |