The invention is generally related to a high-speed electrical connector, and more specifically, to a low-crosstalk high-speed electrical connector having conductive terminal assembly with electrical compensation.
The field of high-speed data transmission imposes higher and higher requirements for electrical performance of an electrical connector. The electrical connector must reliably transmit data signal and ensure signal integrity, and as the size of the electrical connector increasingly becomes more compact, a plurality of terminals positioned in the electrical connectors are increasingly arranged at a higher densities. Since the space between signal terminals gets smaller, signal interference (“crosstalk”) will occur between signal terminal pairs, particularly between adjacent differential signal terminal pairs. Such signal interference negatively affects the signal integrity of the whole signal transmission system.
In
During the process of transmitting the signal, many signal transmission converting steps are performed, all of which cumulatively have a negative effect on signal integrity, such as insertion loss, loop loss, near-end crosstalk and the like. Additionally, since the conventional electrical connector integrates two PCBs through which the signal is compensated, the conventional electrical connector is complicated in structure, large is size, and has high manufacturing costs.
There is a need to a high speed electrical connector that reliably transmits data signal with high signal integrity, but has a small form factor, and of which can be economically produced.
A conductive terminal assembly of an electrical connector has a terminal aligning plate and four pairs of differential signal terminals. The terminal aligning plate made of a dielectric material. The four pairs of differential signal terminals are arranged in two columns in an array on the terminal aligning plate. Each terminal has a terminating end, a contacting end, and a terminal body. The terminal body extends between the terminating end and the contacting end. The terminal bodies of two first terminals in the same column, which are longitudinally adjacent to each other and have opposite polarities, are offset transversely.
The invention will now be described by way of example, with reference to the accompanying Figures, of which:
According to requirements, specific embodiments of the present invention will be revealed herein. However, those of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that the embodiments revealed herein are only exemplary examples and the present invention may take various forms. Hence, specific details revealed herein are not regarded as limiting the present invention, but only regarded as a basis of claims and a basis for teaching those skilled in the art to apply the present invention differently in any appropriate mode, including employment of various features disclosed and combination of features that might not be explicitly disclosed.
The term “alignment area” used in this invention means an area where the terminal bodies or the terminating ends of two terminals face each other in longitudinal direction.
In an embodiment of
In the embodiments of
In an embodiment, to reduce undesired single-end coupling, terminal bodies 13 of terminals 2 and 3 in the same column, which are longitudinally adjacent to each other and have opposite polarities, are offset transversely to eliminate the alignment area and thereby to reduce the single-end coupling so that electrical “balance” of the differential signal terminal pairs A and B can be improved. Similarly, terminal bodies 13 of terminals 6 and 7 in the same column, which are longitudinally adjacent to each other and have opposite polarities, are offset transversely to eliminate the alignment area and thereby to reduce the single-end coupling so that electrical “balance” of the differential signal terminal pairs C and D can be improved.
Examples of near-end crosstalk between the differential signal terminal pair A and differential signal terminal pair B in the same column, near-end crosstalk between the differential signal terminal pair A and differential signal terminal pair C in the same line, and near-end crosstalk between the differential signal terminal pair A and the differential signal terminal pair D in diagonal direction will now be discussed.
First, the near-end crosstalk (NEXT for short) between the differential signal terminal pair A and the differential signal terminal pair B is discussed as an example, NEXT_AB=1→3+2→4−2→3−1→4. The desired single-end coupling is enhanced and undesired single-end coupling is weakened by widening the horizontal terminal bodies of the terminals 1, 3 and by simultaneously widening the horizontal terminal bodies and vertical terminating ends of the terminals 2, 4 and by offsetting the terminals 2 and 3 transversely. By transversely offsetting the terminals 2, 3, the alignment area thereof is eliminated and the single-end crosstalk of 2→3 is decreased. By widening terminals 1, 3 in the horizontal direction and widening terminals 2, 4 both in the horizontal and vertical directions, the sum of the single-end crosstalk of 1→3 and the single-end crosstalk of 2→4 is increased. As a result, crosstalk between the differential signal terminal pairs A and B is reduced.
By widening terminals 2, 4 both in the horizontal and vertical directions, the limited space available is efficiently used, and the terminals 2 and 4 located inside of the column are prevented from occupying excessive in the horizontal direction.
Next, the near-end crosstalk between the differential signal terminal pair A and the differential signal terminal pair C is discussed as an example, NEXT_AC =1→5+2→6−2→5−1→6. Since edge-to-edge coupling is performed between terminals 1→5 and terminals 2→6, the single-end crosstalk is relatively small. Since terminals 1 and 6 are positioned at a relatively large distance from each other, the single-end cross talk between terminals 1→6 is very small and not sufficient to offset a sum of the single-end crosstalk between terminals 1→5 and the single-end crosstalk between terminals 2→6. Furthermore, the coupling between terminals 1→6 cannot be effectively increased because the two terminals are spaced the large distance apart, and the alignment area cannot be increased. Therefore, in order to reduce NEXT_AC, the single-end coupling between terminals 2→5 needs to be increased appropriately to offset the sum of the single-end crosstalk between terminals 1→5 and the single-end crosstalk between terminals 2→6. By increasing the alignment area of the terminals 2 and 5, the single-end crosstalk of terminals 2 and 5 is enhanced.
When the differential signal terminal pairs in the column direction are improved in the manner described above, where the crosstalk between the differential signal terminal pairs in the column direction is critical, the terminal 2 has been widened so that the coupling between the terminals 2 and 5 is too large for the terminal pairs A and C. Therefore, in between terminal pairs A and C, the alignment area between terminals 2 and 5 need to be reduced to achieve a reduction in the single-end coupling between terminals 2→5, so that the edge-to-edge coupling between terminals 1→5 and between terminals 2→6 suffices to offset the single-end coupling between terminals 2→5. However, the alignment area between terminals 2 and 5 cannot be reduced infinitely, otherwise the crosstalk between terminals 2→5 would become too small to balance the near-end crosstalk between the differential signal terminal pair A and differential signal terminal pair C.
Conventionally the terminal 2 from the differential signal terminal pair A and the terminal 5 from the differential signal terminal pair C would not have an alignment area. However, in an embodiment, in order to balance the edge-to-edge coupling between terminals 1, 5 and between terminals 2, 6, the terminals 2 and 5 generally have the alignment area and produce the single-end coupling so as to counteract the above edge-to-edge coupling. In situations where the crosstalk between the differential signal terminal pairs in the column direction is critical, as discussed above, the terminals 2 and 4, 5 and 7 have horizontal terminal bodies 13 and vertical terminating ends 11 that are widened. Therefore, generally to achieve electrical balance between differential signal terminal pairs A and C in the transverse line, the alignment area of terminals 2 and 5 is maintained at a reasonable level: if the widening in the horizontal and vertical directions is too large, the horizontal widening of terminals 2 and 5 needs to be reduced appropriately; if the widening in the horizontal and vertical directions makes the alignment area of terminals 2 and 5 insufficient, the widening needs to be increased appropriately.
Likewise, the above applies to the situation between terminal pairs B and D (NEXT_BD=3→7+4→8−3→8−4→7). The alignment area of the terminals 4-7 needs to be increased in order to increase the single-end crosstalk of terminals 4 and 7.
The near-end crosstalk between the differential signal terminal pair A and the differential signal terminal pair D in the diagonal direction is discussed as an example: NEXT_AD=1→7+2→8−2→7−1→8. Since terminals 1 and 7 and terminals 2 and 8 are positioned apart at a relatively far distance from each other, the single-end crosstalk of 1→7 and 2→8 is relatively small. Further, the terminals 1 and 8 are spaced too far apart from each other, so the single-end crosstalk of 1→8 is also very small. To achieve balance between near-end crosstalk of terminal pairs B and C, there is a need to enhance the single-end crosstalk between the terminals 2 and 7, and therefore there is a need to allow for a certain alignment area between the terminals 2 and 7 to adequately offset the sum of the single-end crosstalk between the terminals 1, 7 and the single-end crosstalk between the terminals 2, 8.
Since the near-end crosstalk between the differential signal terminal pairs B, C is very small, no discussion has been provided.
To maintain the electrical balance on the above-mentioned columns, namely, terminal pairs A and B, and terminal pairs C and D, the terminals 2 and 7 are widened in both the horizontal direction and the vertical direction. Specifically, terminal 2 is widened to increase the coupling with the terminal 4, and terminal 7 is widened to increase the coupling with the terminal 5. As such crosstalk is reduced between terminal pairs A and B and crosstalk between terminal pairs C and D. If widening of the terminals 2 and 7 on the diagonal line in both directions, for the sake of electrical balance of terminal pairs in the columns, causes the alignment area thereof to become too large, the crosstalk between the differential terminal pairs A and D on the diagonal line becomes unbalanced, and correspondingly the alignment area between the terminals 2 and 7 needs to be reduced. Thereby crosstalk between 2→7 would need to be reduced. However, the alignment area between the terminals 2 and 7 cannot be reduced infinitely; otherwise crosstalk between 2→7 becomes too small and insufficient to counteract the single-end crosstalk between terminals 1→7 and 2→8.
As described above, reduction of differential crosstalk can be achieved by appropriately balancing the single-end crosstalk according to the above calculation formula of differential crosstalk in combination with a definition and geometrical structure of the terminal. While the undesired single-end crosstalk is reduced by offsetting some terminals (reducing the alignment area), and on the other hand, the desired single-end crosstalk is increased by widening the terminal bodies and terminating ends of the terminals to increase the alignment area). The purpose of widening some terminals, for example, terminals 2 and 4 and terminals 5 and 7, in both the horizontal direction and the vertical direction, namely, widening both the terminal bodies as well as the terminating ends, is to address the need for the assembly 10 to occupy a compact space. In an embodiment, if the desired space is limited, widening may be performed solely in the horizontal direction.
In the above described embodiments, integration of the PCB is has been eliminated and a conductive terminal assembly 10 is disclosed having the client-desired electrical performance in a smaller volume. Furthermore, the above described embodiments are low in manufacturing costs, having a relatively simple structure, and may substantially improve production efficiency and reduce an unqualified product rate. Additionally, the conductive terminal assembly 10 is smaller and more space-saving than conventional designs.
In the embodiments of
Consequently, from
Although electrical balance, as described in the above embodiments of
By improving the structure and/or arrangement of conductive terminal assemblies 10 in an electrical connector, the present invention enhances desired single-end coupling between terminals and/or reduce undesired single-end coupling between terminals to make the differential signal terminal pairs electrically more “balanced”. Differential crosstalk introduced at a mating plug connector and in a mating area of the plug connector and the receptacle connector is counteracted without changing the structure of the mating plug connector and the mating area of terminals of the electrical connector. Additionally, the small form factor of the electrical connector is maintained.
One of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate that variations and improvements to the above shapes and arrangements may be made, including combinations of technical features revealed or protected individually here, and including other combinations of these features. These variations and/or combinations all fall within the technical field to which the present invention relates and fall within the protection scope of claims of the present invention. Any reference sign in claims shall not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2012 1 0279536 | Aug 2012 | CN | national |
This application is a continuation of PCT International Application No. PCT/IB2013/056437 filed Aug. 6, 2013, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to Chinese Patent application No. 201210279536.2, filed Aug. 7, 2012.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6120330 | Gwiazdowski | Sep 2000 | A |
7431616 | Minich | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7481678 | Aekins | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7485010 | Aekins | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7572148 | Pepe | Aug 2009 | B1 |
7601034 | Aekins | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7628656 | Shields | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7658648 | Aekins | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7682203 | Pharney | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7708603 | Little | May 2010 | B1 |
7824197 | Westman | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7967614 | Cina | Jun 2011 | B1 |
7976349 | Heckmann | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7985101 | Fitzpatrick | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8002571 | Hogue | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8002590 | Ciezak | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8007311 | Hogue | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8038461 | Hsu | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8047875 | Yamakami | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8070529 | Xiong | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8075347 | Hogue | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8133069 | Hogue | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8157600 | Ciezak | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8202118 | Cohen | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8202129 | Lin | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8226441 | Regnier | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8272888 | Hogue | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8313338 | Hogue | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8353723 | Heckmann | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8425255 | Erickson | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8465302 | Regnier | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8568176 | Huang | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8650750 | Engels | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8747158 | Szczesny | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8764483 | Ellison | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8784116 | Buck | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8801473 | Fransen | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8870600 | Wu | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8926377 | Kirk | Jan 2015 | B2 |
9083096 | Tobey | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9112309 | Chen | Aug 2015 | B1 |
9118134 | Babu | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9136649 | Shih | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9160123 | Pao | Oct 2015 | B1 |
9203195 | Mueller | Dec 2015 | B2 |
20030186591 | Jensen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050272315 | Hatterscheid | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060019517 | Raistrick | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060121793 | Pharney | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20080003877 | Siev | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080248693 | Winings | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080254685 | Murr | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100130069 | Fyne | May 2010 | A1 |
20100210132 | Hogue | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20120225585 | Lee | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20140273633 | Gatnau Navarro | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140273634 | Bopp | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140273638 | Valenti | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140310957 | Buck | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150222056 | Zhu | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150223321 | Ling | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150280375 | Xu | Oct 2015 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in co-pending application PCT/IB2013/056437, dated Dec. 13, 2013, 13 pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/IB2013/056437, dated Feb. 10, 2015, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150222056 A1 | Aug 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/IB2013/056437 | Aug 2013 | US |
Child | 14617411 | US |