The present invention relates to an electrical connector assembly, and more particularly to an electrical connector assembly having a retractable terminal blade stabilizer.
Electrical connector assemblies are know to have a male connector which mates to a female connector thereby electrically engaging respective male terminal blades to female terminals. The blade of each male terminal may extend axially into a blind bore defined by an axially projecting shroud of the male connector body. Prior to mating of the electrical connector assembly, a conventional self-aligning blade stabilizer is known to be snap fitted into a blade alignment position within the blind bore of the male connector via a dual locking feature which prevents withdrawal of the stabilizer from the male connector and restricts further insertion of the stabilizer into the blind bore from the blade alignment position and toward a fully seated position. When the stabilizer is in the blade alignment position, the tips of the blades are disposed within respective apertures of the stabilizer and are thus pre-aligned to respective mating female terminals. Moreover, when the stabilizer is in the alignment position the terminal blades are protected from being inadvertently knocked and bent which could cause blade misalignment preventing connector assembly mating or hindering electrical continuity of the mated assembly. Furthermore, the stabilizer prevents entry of debris into the blind bore of the male connector which could obstruct the mating of the electrical connector assembly. During mating of the electrical connector assembly, the stabilizer is pushed out of the blade alignment position and into the seated position as the blades travel through the apertures and into the female terminals of the female connector.
Unfortunately, when the mated electrical connector assembly is un-mated, the stabilizer remains in the seated position and does not automatically return or retract to its original alignment position. Thus, the stabilizer is not reuseable and does not protect the terminal blades of an un-mated electrical connector assembly which was once mated.
An electrical connector assembly has a male connector which mates to a female connector thereby electrically engaging male terminal blades, locked to a male connector body, to female terminals locked to a female connector body. The blade of each male terminal project into a blind bore defined by a shroud of the male connector body. Prior to mating of the electrical connector assembly, a retractable terminal blade stabilizer is snap fitted into a blade alignment position with the male connector via a dual fastening feature constructed and arranged between the male connector body and the stabilizer, which prevents withdrawal of the stabilizer from the male connector and restricts further insertion of the stabilizer into the blind bore. When the stabilizer is in the blade alignment position, the tips of the blades are disposed within respective apertures of the stabilizer and aligned to their respective female terminals and the remaining portion of the blades are shielded and thus protected from possible damage. During mating of the electrical connector assembly, the female connector body is press fitted to an axial projecting member of the stabilizer, prior to the stabilizer moving out of the alignment position. Once the stabilizer is fitted to the female connector, continued mating causes the stabilizer to move out of the alignment position and into a seated position as the blades travel through the apertures and into the female terminals of the female connector. When the electrical connector assembly is being unmated, the female connector being tightly fitted to the stabilizer pulls the stabilizer out from the seated position and back into the blade alignment position. Because the engagement of the stabilizer to male connector in the blade alignment position is stronger than the tight fit of the stabilizer to the female connector, continued un-mating of the female connector disengages the stabilizer from the female connector leaving the stabilizer in the blade alignment position as the female connector is completely separated from the male connector. The stabilizer is thus retracted and placed back into a position for protecting and maintaining alignment of the terminal blades of the male connector.
Preferably, the rigid member projects axially from a base plate of the stabilizer and toward the female connector. Preferably, two rounded tabs project laterally outward from the member to resiliently engage the female connector body within a cavity carried by the body. The tight fit between the tabs of the member and the female connector is strong enough to pull the stabilizer from the fully seated position to the pre-stage position when the electrical connector assembly is being unmated. However, this tight fit is not strong enough to force the stabilizer out of the pre-staged position in such a fashion that the stabilizer becomes completely removed from the blind bore of the male connector.
An advantage of the present invention is a robust and low cost stabilizer which is automatically retractable and thus is repeatably reusable during the mating and un-mating process of the electrical connector assembly. Another advantage of the present invention is the prevention of accidental mis-alignment or bending of the protruding blades of the male terminals of an electrical connector assembly being re-mated. Yet another advantage of the present invention is the elimination of foreign article or debris collection within the blind bore of the male connector which could prevent fill re-mating of the electrical connector.
The presently preferred embodiments of the invention are disclosed in the following description and in the accompanied drawings, wherein:
Referring now to the drawings,
Unlike conventional blade stabilizers, the plastic blade stabilizer 22 of the present invention is reuseable and thus automatically retracts, or pulls partially away from the male connector 26 when the connector assembly 20 is un-mated. When the connector assembly 20 is being mated, the blade stabilizer 22 moves from a blade alignment position 34 which pre-aligns and protects the blades 24, as best shown in
In both positions 34, 36, the stabilizer 22 is disposed within a blind bore or alcove 38 defined by a forward projecting circumferential housing or shroud 40 of the male connector body 26. During the mating process and with the stabilizer 22 in the alignment position 34, the female connector 28 moves along a mating axis 42 into the blind bore 38 from a fully un-mated position 44 wherein the female connector 28 is completely detached from the stabilizer 22 and the male connector 26 (as best shown in FIG. 1). Continued insertion of the female connector 28 causes the body 32 of the female connector to releasably engage the stabilizer 22 as the stabilizer remains in the alignment position 34 (as best shown in FIG. 2). With additional insertion force and with the stabilizer 22 engaged to the female connector body 32, the stabilizer 22 releases from the alignment position 34 and moves toward the fully seated position 36 as the female connector 28 pushes against the stabilizer 22 to achieve a mated position 46, as best shown in FIG. 3. When the connector assembly 20 is fully mated, the stabilizer 22 is in the fully seated position 36 and remains engaged resiliently to the female connector body 32.
During the un-mating process of the electrical connector assembly 20, the positive engagement of the stabilizer 22 to the female connector 28 causes the stabilizer 22 to retract and move with the female connector 28 out of the seated position 36 and back into the alignment position 34. Because the engagement force holding the stabilizer 22 to the female connector body 32 is weaker than the force necessary to completely separate the stabilizer 22 from the male connector body 30, the stabilizer 22 remains in the alignment position 34 as the female connector 28 completely withdraws from both the stabilizer 22 and the 20 male connector 26. Although the engagement force holding the stabilizer 22 to the female connector body 32 is weaker than the force necessary to separate the stabilizer 22 from the male connector body 30, it is stronger than frictional forces between the stabilizer 22 and the male connector 26 which would resist movement of the stabilizer 22 from the seated position 36 and back into the alignment position 34.
Referring to
Referring to
During assembly, when the stabilizer 22 is being placed in the blade alignment position 34, the protuberance 60 resiliently engages a forward facing ramped face 70 carried by the lock nub 66 and slides thereon until the protuberance 60 snap fits axially over and settles just rearward of the lock nub 66 and directly adjacent to a stop face 71 of the lock nub 66 disposed substantially perpendicular to the shroud 40 of the male body 30. Therefore, the wall 62 must flex substantially radially inward and then snap radially outward to place the protuberance 60 between the lock and stage nubs 66, 68 thus placing the stabilizer 22 in the blade alignment position 34. Preventing the stabilizer 22 from moving further into the blind bore 38 is a stop face 73 carried by the stage nub 68. The stop faces 71, 73 axially define the recess 65 of the dual fastening feature 58 which is carried by the shroud 40.
With the stabilizer 22 engaged to the male connector 26 in the blade alignment position 34, as best shown in
After the stabilizer 22 is placed in the blade alignment position 34, and during the mating process of the connectors 26, 28, a rigid member 72 which projects rearward from a trailing surface 74 of the base plate 52 inserts into a receiving cavity 76 carried by the female body 32. The member 72 has two rounded tabs 75 which project laterally outward in opposite directions and resiliently bear upon the inner walls of the cavity creating a controlled and slight press fit of the member 72 to the female body 32. Preferably, there are two symmetrically spaced members 72. Each member continues to insert further into respective cavities 76 until a leading surface 78 of the female connector body 32, through which the female terminals are exposed, contacts the trailing surface 74 of the base plate 52 of the stabilizer 22.
With continued mating, the female connector 28 pushes directly upon the stabilizer 22 and snaps the protuberances 60 past the stage nub 68 as the stabilizer moves from the alignment position 34 and toward the seated position 36. As the stabilizer enters further into the blind bore 38, the blades 24 extend further through the apertures 50 to electrically contact the female terminals of the female connector 28. When the stabilizer 22 is in the fully seated position 36, the blades 24 are fully extended through the apertures 50, the void 54 is eliminated, and the leading surface 56 is in contact with the leading face 48 of the male connector body 30. The axial mating force necessary to press fit the member 72 into the cavity 76 is less than the force necessary to snap fit the stabilizer 22 pass the stage nub 68 of the male connector body 30. This assures the tips of the blades 24 are properly aligned to the female terminals prior to the stabilizer 22 moving out of the blade alignment position 34.
The two-stage fastening feature 58 does not directly act upon the stabilizer 22 when in the seat position 36. Instead, the stabilizer 22 is held in the seated position 36 via the adjacent proximity of the male and female bodies 30, 32 alone. Because there is no resilient lock feature holding the stabilizer directly to the male body 30 when the stabilizer is in the seated position 36, the stabilizer 22 remains secured to the female body 32 during un-mating via the engagement of the stabilizer members 72 within the respective cavities 76 of the female body 32. This resilient engagement is strong enough to overcome the interference of the stage nubs 68, thus the female body 32 pulls the stabilizer axially outward and over the stage nubs 68 until the stabilizer snap locks back into the blade alignment position 34. However, the resilient engagement between the female body 32 and the stabilizer 22 is not strong enough to overcome the obstruction or interference of the stop face 71 of the lock nubs 66, hence, continued withdrawal of the female connector 28 from the male connector 26 will cause the members 72 of the stabilizer 22 to release from the female body 32. When the electrical connector assembly 20 is un-mated, the stabilizer is thus retracted and returned to the alignment position 34.
Referring to
Referring to
Like the first two embodiments, the stabilizer 22″ of the third embodiment also has a rigid number 72″ projecting axially outward from a trailing surface 74″ of the base plate 52″ and is slightly press fitted into a receiving cavity 76″ of the female body 32′ for purposes of stabilizer retraction during un-mating of the assembly 20″.
Referring to
While the forms of the invention herein described constitute presently preferred embodiments, many others are possible. It is not limited herein to mention all the possible equivalent forms or ramifications of the invention. It is understood that the terms used herein are merely descriptive rather than limiting and that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5035633 | Kobayashi et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5222907 | Katabuchi et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5437558 | Sakuraoka et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5879174 | Kountz et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
6086385 | Wang et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6095840 | Yamaguchi et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6142813 | Cummings et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162085 | Chugh et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6171146 | Fink et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179658 | Gunay et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6203364 | Chupak et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208233 | Stein, Sr. et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6247951 | Di Liello et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6247965 | Cummings et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6305957 | Fink et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6338651 | Svette, Jr. et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345706 | Oliver et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6390834 | Hofmeister et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6406307 | Bungo et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6422881 | Puhl et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6443137 | Kraft et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6454060 | Lisenker et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6494751 | Morello et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508666 | Francis | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6533588 | Woith et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6533611 | Morello et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535396 | Degenkolb et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556118 | Skinner | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565372 | Bakker et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6578444 | Wendelin | Jun 2003 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040147158 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |