1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to oil and gas drilling, and more particularly to apparatus and methods for reliably transmitting information between downhole drilling components.
2. Background of the Invention
In the downhole drilling industry, MWD and LWD tools are used to take measurements and gather information concerning downhole geological formations, status of downhole tools, and other conditions located downhole. Such data is useful to drill operators, geologists, engineers, and other personnel located at the surface. This data may be used to adjust drilling parameters, such as drilling direction, penetration speed, and the like, to effectively tap into an oil or gas bearing reservoir. Data may be gathered at various points along the drill string, such as from a bottom hole assembly or from sensors distributed along the drill string.
Nevertheless, data gathering and analysis represent only certain aspects of the overall process. Once gathered, apparatus and methods are needed to rapidly and reliably transmit the data to the earth's surface. Traditionally, technologies such as mud pulse telemetry have been used to transmit data to the surface. However, most traditional methods are limited to very slow data rates and are inadequate for transmitting large quantities of data at high speeds.
In order to overcome these limitations, various efforts have been made to transmit data along electrical and other types of cable integrated directly into drill string components, such as sections of drill pipe. In such systems, electrical contacts or other transmission elements are used to transmit data across tool joints or connection points in the drill string. Nevertheless, many of these efforts have been largely abandoned or frustrated due to unreliability and complexity.
For example, drill strings may include hundreds of sections of drill pipe and other downhole tools connected in series. In order to reach the surface, data must be transmitted reliably across each tool joint. A single faulty connection may break the link between downhole sensors and the surface. Also, because of the inherent linear structure of a drill string, it is very difficult to build redundancy into the system.
The unreliability of various known contact systems is due to several factors. First, since the tool joints are typically screwed together, each of the tools rotate with respect to one another. This causes the contacts to rotate with respect to one another, causing wear, damage, and possible misalignment. In addition, as the tool joints are threaded together, mating surfaces of the downhole tools, such as the primary and secondary shoulders, come into contact. Since downhole tools are not typically manufactured with precise tolerances that may be required by electrical contacts, this may cause inconsistent contact between the contacts.
Moreover, the treatment and handling of drill string components is often harsh. For example, as sections of drill pipe or other tools are connected together, ends of the drill pipe may strike or contact other objects. Thus, delicate contacts or transmission elements located at the tool ends can be easily damaged. In addition, substances such as drilling fluids, mud, sand, dirt, rocks, lubricants, or other substances may be present at or between the tool joints. This may degrade connectivity at the tools joints. Moreover, the transmission elements may be subjected to these conditions each time downhole tools are connected and disconnected.
Thus, what are needed are reliable contacts for transmitting data across tool joints that are capable of overcoming the previously mentioned challenges.
What are further needed are reliable contacts that are resistant to wear and tear encountered in a downhole environment.
What are further needed are reliable contacts that, even when damaged, still provide reliable connectivity.
What are further needed are apparatus and method to adjust the impedance of the contacts to minimize signal reflections at the tool joints.
In view of the foregoing, it is a primary object of the present invention to provide apparatus and methods for reliably transmitting information between downhole tools in a drill string. It is a further object of the invention to provide robust electrical connections that may withstand the rigors of a downhole environment. It is yet another object of the invention to provide apparatus and methods to reduce signal reflections that may occur at the tool joints.
Consistent with the foregoing objects, and in accordance with the invention as embodied and broadly described herein, an electrical contact system for transmitting information across tool joints, while minimizing signal reflections that occur at the tool joints, is disclosed in one embodiment of the invention as including a first electrical contact comprised of an annular resilient material. An annular conductor is embedded within the annular resilient material and has a surface exposed from the annular resilient material.
A second electrical contact is provided that is substantially equal to the first electrical contact. Likewise, the second electrical contact has an annular resilient material and an annular conductor. The two electrical contacts configured to contact one another such that the annular conductors of each come into physical contact. The annular resilient materials of each electrical contact each have dielectric characteristics and dimensions that are adjusted to provide desired impedance to the electrical contacts.
In selected embodiments, the first and second electrical contacts further include first and second annular housings, respectively, to accommodate the annular resilient materials, and the annular conductors, respectively. In certain embodiments, the electrical contact system includes one or several biasing member to urge each of the electrical contacts together. For example, the biasing member may be a spring, an elastomeric material, an elastomeric-like material, a sponge, a sponge-like material, or the like. In other embodiments, one or both of the annular housings are sprung with respect to corresponding mating surfaces of downhole tool in which they are mounted. This may provide a biasing effect to one or both of the electrical contacts.
In selected embodiments, the first and second electrical contacts are configured such that pressure encountered in a downhole environment presses them more firmly together. In other embodiments, one or both of the electrical contacts are configured to “orbit” with respect to a mating surface of a downhole tool. By “orbiting,” it is meant that the electrical contacts may pivot along multiple axes to provide improved contact.
In certain embodiments, the annular resilient materials are constructed of a material selected to flow into voids that may or may not be present within the electrical contacts. In selected embodiments, the annular resilient material may be constructed of a material such as silicone, Vamac, polysulfide, Neoprene, Hypalon, butyl, Teflon, millable or cast polyurethane, rubber, fluorosilicone, epichlorohydrin, nitrile, styrene butadiene, Kalrez, fluorocarbon, Chemraz, Aflas, other polymers, and the like. To provide strength, durability, or other characteristics, modifiers such as Kevlar, fibers, graphite, or like materials, may be added to the annular resilient material.
In selected embodiments, a cable is electrically connected to one or both of the electrical contracts, and the impedance of one or both of the electrical contacts is adjusted to match the impedance of the cable. In certain embodiments, the cable is a coaxial cable. In other embodiments, multiple annular conductors may be embedded in the annular resilient material to provide multiple connections.
In another aspect of the present invention, a method for transmitting information across tool joints in a drill string, while minimizing signal reflections occurring at the tool joints, may include providing a first electrical contact comprised of an annular resilient material, and an annular conductor embedded within the first annular resilient material. The annular conductor has a surface exposed from the annular resilient material. The method may further include providing a corresponding electrical contact substantially equal to the first electrical contact. The corresponding electrical contact also includes an annular resilient material and a second annular conductor. The method further includes adjusting the dielectric characteristics, the dimensions, or both of the annular resilient materials to provide desired impedance to the electrical contacts.
In selected embodiments, the method may further include providing annular housings to the electrical contacts, respectively, to accommodate the annular resilient materials, and the annular conductors. In certain embodiments, a method in accordance with the invention includes urging the electrical contacts together. Likewise, adjusting may include adjusting the impedance to match the impedance of a cable electrically connected to at least one of the first and second electrical contracts. In certain embodiments, the cable is a coaxial cable.
The foregoing and other features of the present invention will become more fully apparent from the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only typical embodiments in accordance with the invention and are, therefore, not to be considered limiting of its scope, the invention will be described with additional specificity and detail through use of the accompanying drawings.
It will be readily understood that the components of the present invention, as generally described and illustrated in the Figures herein, could be arranged and designed in a wide variety of different configurations. Thus, the following more detailed description of embodiments of apparatus and methods of the present invention, as represented in the Figures, is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, as claimed, but is merely representative of various selected embodiments of the invention.
The illustrated embodiments of the invention will be best understood by reference to the drawings, wherein like parts are designated by like numerals throughout. Those of ordinary skill in the art will, of course, appreciate that various modifications to the apparatus and methods described herein may easily be made without departing from the essential characteristics of the invention, as described in connection with the Figures. Thus, the following description of the Figures is intended only by way of example, and simply illustrates certain selected embodiments consistent with the invention as claimed herein.
Referring to
In selected embodiments, a contact assembly 10 may include an annular housing 12 and a resilient material 16 located within the housing 12. An annular contact 14 may be embedded into the resilient material and may have a surface exposed from the resilient material 16. The resilient material 16 may serve to insulate the annular conductor 14 from the housing 12 as well as perform other functions described in this specification. In selected embodiments, a cable 18 may include a conductor connected to the annular contact 14. In certain embodiments, the contact assembly 10 may include an alignment and retention member 20 that may fit within a corresponding recess milled or formed into the downhole tool. The retention member 20 may be used to retain a desired tension in the cable 18.
Referring to
Referring to
As illustrated, the housing 12 may include a shoulder 26 that may engage a corresponding shoulder milled or formed into the recess 23. This may enable the contact assembly 10 to be pressed into the recess 23. Once inserted, the shoulder 26 may prevent the contact assembly 10 from exiting the recess 23. Likewise, the housing 12 may optionally include one or several retaining shoulder 28a, 28b to help retain the resilient material 16 within the housing 12.
As was previously mentioned with respect to
Thus, in selected embodiments, the impedance of the contact assembly 10 may be adjusted to match a particular coaxial cable 18 being used. In certain embodiments, the contact assembly 10 may more or less resemble coaxial cable. For example, the conductor 14 may be analogous to the core conduct of coaxial cable, the housing 12 may be analogous to the coaxial shield, and the resilient material 16 may be analogous to the dielectric material within the coaxial cable 18. By adjusting the dimensions 30a, 30b, 32 of the resilient material 16, and the dielectric properties of the resilient material 16, the impedance of the contact assembly 10 may be adjusted to provide a desired impedance. Thus, signal reflections occurring at the contact assemblies 10 may be minimized as much as possible.
The resilient material 16 may be constructed of any suitable material capable of withstanding a downhole environment. For example, in certain embodiments, the resilient material 16 may be constructed of a material such as silicone, Vamac, polysulfide, Neoprene, Hypalon, butyl, Teflon, millable or cast polyurethane, rubber, fluorosilicone, epichlorohydrin, nitrile, styrene butadiene, Kalrez, fluorocarbon, Chemraz, Aflas, other polymers, and the like. To provide strength, durability, or other characteristics, modifiers such as Kevlar, fibers, graphite, or like materials, may be added to the annular resilient materials 16.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
In selected embodiments, three “energizing” elements may contribute to keep the contacts 14a, 14b firmly pressed together. First, as was previously mentioned with respect to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The present invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from its essence or essential characteristics. The described embodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrative, and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is, therefore, indicated by the appended claims, rather than by the foregoing description. All changes within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/430,734 “Loaded Transducer for Downhole Drilling Components” filed on May 6, 2003 and is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/612,255 “Transmission Element for Downhole Drilling Components” filed on Jul. 2, 2003, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/453,076 entitled “Improved Transducer for Downhole Drilling Components” filed on Jun. 3, 2003. All the above applications incorporated by reference herein for all they contain. This invention was made with government support under Contract No. DE-FC26-01NT41229 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
749633 | Seeley | Jan 1904 | A |
2178931 | Crites et al. | Nov 1939 | A |
2197392 | Hawthorn | Apr 1940 | A |
2249769 | Leonardon | Jul 1941 | A |
2301783 | Lee | Nov 1942 | A |
2354887 | Silverman et al. | Aug 1944 | A |
2379800 | Hare | Jul 1945 | A |
2414719 | Cloud | Jan 1947 | A |
2531120 | Feaster | Nov 1950 | A |
2633414 | Boivinet | Mar 1953 | A |
2659773 | Barney | Nov 1953 | A |
2662123 | Koenig, Jr. | Dec 1953 | A |
2748358 | Johnston | May 1956 | A |
2974303 | Dixon | Mar 1961 | A |
2982360 | Morton et al. | May 1961 | A |
3079549 | Martin | Feb 1963 | A |
3090031 | Lord | May 1963 | A |
3170137 | Brandt | Feb 1965 | A |
3186222 | Martin | Jun 1965 | A |
3194886 | Mason | Jul 1965 | A |
3209323 | Grossman, Jr. | Sep 1965 | A |
3227973 | Gray | Jan 1966 | A |
3253245 | Brandt | May 1966 | A |
3518608 | Papadopoulos | Jun 1970 | A |
3518609 | Fontenot, Jr. | Jun 1970 | A |
3657681 | Falkner | Apr 1972 | A |
3693133 | Harbonn et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3696332 | Dickson, Jr. et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3731258 | Spicer | May 1973 | A |
3793632 | Still | Feb 1974 | A |
3807502 | Heilhecker et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3879097 | Oertle | Apr 1975 | A |
3930220 | Shawhan | Dec 1975 | A |
3957118 | Barry et al. | May 1976 | A |
3989330 | Cullen et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4012092 | Godbey | Mar 1977 | A |
4087781 | Grossi et al. | May 1978 | A |
4095865 | Denison et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
4121193 | Denison | Oct 1978 | A |
4126848 | Denison | Nov 1978 | A |
4215426 | Klatt | Jul 1980 | A |
4220381 | Van der Graaf | Sep 1980 | A |
4348672 | Givler | Sep 1982 | A |
4445734 | Cunningham | May 1984 | A |
4496203 | Meadows | Jan 1985 | A |
4537457 | Davis, Jr. et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4578675 | Macleod | Mar 1986 | A |
4605268 | Meador | Aug 1986 | A |
4660910 | Sharp et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4676563 | Curlett et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4683944 | Curlett | Aug 1987 | A |
4690212 | Termohlen | Sep 1987 | A |
4698631 | Kelly, Jr. et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4722402 | Weldon | Feb 1988 | A |
4785247 | Meador et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4788544 | Howard | Nov 1988 | A |
4799544 | Curlett | Jan 1989 | A |
4806928 | Veneruso | Feb 1989 | A |
4884071 | Howard | Nov 1989 | A |
4901069 | Veneruso | Feb 1990 | A |
4913657 | Naito et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4914433 | Galle | Apr 1990 | A |
4924949 | Curlett | May 1990 | A |
5008664 | More et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5052941 | Hernandez-Marti et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5148408 | Matthews | Sep 1992 | A |
5248857 | Ollivier | Sep 1993 | A |
5278550 | Rhein-Knudsen et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5302138 | Shields | Apr 1994 | A |
5311661 | Zifferer | May 1994 | A |
5332049 | Tew | Jul 1994 | A |
5334801 | Mohn | Aug 1994 | A |
5371496 | Tanamachi | Dec 1994 | A |
5454605 | Mott | Oct 1995 | A |
5455573 | Delatorre | Oct 1995 | A |
5505502 | Smith et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5517843 | Winship | May 1996 | A |
5521592 | Veneruso | May 1996 | A |
5568448 | Tanigushi et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5650983 | Kondo et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5691712 | Meek et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5743301 | Winship | Apr 1998 | A |
RE35790 | Pustanyk et al. | May 1998 | E |
5810401 | Mosing et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5833490 | Bouldin | Nov 1998 | A |
5853199 | Wilson | Dec 1998 | A |
5856710 | Baughman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5898408 | Du | Apr 1999 | A |
5908212 | Smith et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924499 | Birchak et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5942990 | Smith et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5955966 | Jeffryes et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5959547 | Tubel et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5971072 | Huber et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6030004 | Schnock et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041872 | Holcomb | Mar 2000 | A |
6045165 | Sugino et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6046685 | Tubel | Apr 2000 | A |
6057784 | Schaaf et al. | May 2000 | A |
6104707 | Abraham | Aug 2000 | A |
6108268 | Moss | Aug 2000 | A |
6123561 | Turner et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141763 | Smith et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6173334 | Matsuzaki et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177882 | Ringgenberg et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188223 | van Steenwyk et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196335 | Rodney | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209632 | Holbert et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223826 | Chau et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6367564 | Mills et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367565 | Hall | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6392317 | Hall et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6405795 | Holbert et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6641434 | Boyle et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6655464 | Chau et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670880 | Hall et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6688396 | Floerke et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
20020135179 | Boyle et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020193004 | Boyle et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030070842 | Bailey et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030213598 | Hughes | Nov 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0399987 | Nov 1990 | EP |
2361113 | Oct 2001 | GB |
W8801096 | Feb 1988 | WO |
WO9014497 | Nov 1990 | WO |
WO 0121932 | Mar 2001 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050074988 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10612255 | Jul 2003 | US |
Child | 10605493 | US | |
Parent | 10453076 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 10612255 | US | |
Parent | 10430734 | May 2003 | US |
Child | 10453076 | US |