The subject matter disclosed herein relates to dynamic windows, such as smart windows. More particularly, the subject matter disclosed herein relates to a technique for making electrical contact to a dynamic window, such as a dynamic Insulated Glass Unit (IGU) window assembly.
For a conventional dynamic IGU, the transparent conducting layer of an electrochromic pane is semi-hermetically sealed within the IGU and electrical contact must be made between the transparent conducting layer and the exterior of the sealed IGU. Conventional techniques for making the electrical contact involve using a fired, silk screened or soldered bus bar.
The breaching of seal 102 by bus bar 101 reduces the reliability of seal 102.
The subject matter disclosed herein is illustrated by way of example and not by limitation in the accompanying figures in which like reference numerals indicate similar elements and in which:
As used herein, the word “exemplary” means “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment described herein as “exemplary” is not to be construed as necessarily preferred or advantageous over other embodiments.
The subject matter disclosed eliminates a bus bar from running underneath the seal which, in turn, eliminates one of the highest risk reliability failure modes in a finished IGU product by utilizing a conducting substrate as a contact path for control signals in place of a conventional bus bar. Another benefit of the subject matter disclosed herein is that bus bars can take up shapes on more of the perimeter of the coating inside the volume which enhances performance of the electrical operation of the electrochromic (EC) stack.
In
In
In
While the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein are formed with two electrically isolated zones, it should be understood that more than two electrically isolated zones could be formed for a multi-zone dynamic IGU. Additionally, while the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein are formed so that the two conductive material layers cover substantially the same area as the electrochromic stack, it should be understood that at least one conductive material layer could be formed to cover an area that is substantially different from the area of the electrochromic stack. Further, an alternative exemplary embodiment provides that the electrochromic stack is formed so that it does not overlap the isolation line. For this alternative exemplary embodiment, an additional masking step is required to keep the electrochromic stack from overlapping the isolation line, while the second (or top) transparent conductive layer overlaps the isolation line. Yet another exemplary embodiment provides that the electrochromic stack overlaps one or more selected portions of the isolation line.
Although the foregoing disclosed subject matter has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced that are within the scope of the appended claims. Accordingly, the present embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the subject matter disclosed herein is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope and equivalents of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5076673 | Lynam et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5140455 | Varaprasad et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142407 | Varaprasad et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5145609 | Varaprasad et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5151816 | Varaprasad et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5233461 | Doman et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5239405 | Varaprasad et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5340503 | Varaprasad et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5471338 | Yu et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5472643 | Varaprasad et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5500760 | Varaprasad et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5567360 | Varaprasad et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5668663 | Varaprasad et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5724187 | Varaprasad et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5805330 | Byker et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5953150 | Smarto et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5969847 | Coleman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5985184 | Lynam | Nov 1999 | A |
5995271 | Zieba et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002511 | Varaprasad et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6045643 | Byker et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055089 | Schulz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6118573 | Kubo et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6143209 | Lynam | Nov 2000 | A |
6154306 | Varaprasad et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6166849 | Coleman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6204953 | Zieba et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6207083 | Varaprasad et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6244716 | Steenwyk et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6261641 | Zieba et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6433913 | Bauer et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6515787 | Westfall et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6561460 | Rukavina et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6783099 | Rukavina et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6795226 | Agrawal et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6822778 | Westfall et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6853472 | Warner et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862125 | Warner et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6995891 | Agrawal et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004592 | Varaprasad et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7130101 | Rukavina et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7133181 | Greer | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7173750 | Rukavina | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7202987 | Varaprasad et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7248392 | Rukavina et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7277215 | Greer | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7300166 | Agrawal et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7317106 | Warner et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7324261 | Tonar et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7362491 | Busick et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20020021481 | Lin et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020041443 | Varaprasad et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020135881 | Rukavina et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040257633 | Agrawal et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070002422 | O'Shaughnessy | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20080074724 | Agrawal et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100067090 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |